The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About31281 / 81-27April 16, 1981 # 27 RFSOLtTt'ION •r �. s � �n r • � � a�• • '� i� • +a. • •.ra�. ��P 4ei. 7u L�� wa�Ul�'� ••�� • • r.� 4F-��M!F 1 Y7u _�MMY a�,W�U IIY:y14MC�;�I BE TT RESOLVED by the Co�nn Council of the City of Oshkosh that the proper City officials are hereby authorized and directed to submit applicati.ons to the Department of Natural Fesources and the Envimnmental Pmtection Agency to obtain a grant of $733,500.00 to ftmd the Sewer System Evaluation Su=vey. —27— ,,,,.,,, ,,.,- SLC::_.,,,, �1�../ ,�-> °p?„C'; ? ti� . , �; � !G C GG� S� /7/�C7'� HOWARO NEEOLES TAMMEN � BERGENDOFF April 6, 1981 Mr. William D. Frueh City Manager Mr. Jack Schneider Director of Public Works City of Oshkosh P. 0. Box 1130 Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54g02 Re: Final Recommendations, Oshkosh SSES Program Gentlemen: � � � The purpose of this letter is to finalize our firm's recom— mendations for the City of Oshkosh's Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES). These recommendations are based on our evaluation of flow data from the Infiltration and Inflow Report; from responses regarding basement flooding from the three questionnaires mailed out in 1980 to residents in the study area; and from discussions with yourselves and other members of your staff. In our previous correspondence regarding preliminary quanti— ties and cost estimates for the scope of the SSES, we have utilized only the information contained in the I/I Report, combined with the USEPA guidelines, to essentially give you the "worst case" estimates for your annual budgeting pur— poses. At that time, due to time constraints, no attempt was made to focus the SSES Program on the specifie problems which Oshkosh is trying to overcome, i.e., basement flooding in certain areas, and bypassing of sewage into the river and lake. By focusing on these problems, and by integrating into the analysis the patterns found in the basement flood— ing questionnaire responses, we feel that we can now recom— mend a program which is reduced in its initial scope, re— sponsive to your concern about cost and effectiveness, and which will accomplish the major objectives of the program. In previous purposes of cussed first recommending AmMbcb Enylnwn Vlannw� correspondence Ne have discussed the general an SSES. In the attached summary we have dis— the objectives of the program which we are , followed by some detail on that program. aeis w«� c.vaa nn... wu..�k... wi.00�,i� vaie. �u �esaoia RMmr� M G LamOMOrt Jr GE. James i Fnn PE Paui L Memema� �E Gerarp c Fm PE wm�am rn Wacmer PE. Geoe9e N Ergaman vE B�o.ning Gw i� C�a��es T Hennqan vE. Eegar 8 Ja��son PE. Da��ei J wa�w�r�s vE. Raio� E Myers FaiA. Da��e� J SO�9a PE Jo�� l Cono� PE Fra�us x Hau vE. Roam 5 Cama �E �Cnib A Du0R5 �E. WiIWm LOV<A�F. WtllOm C Mareaim PE Awod�M Oanrtl J �ppei PE. Ropan W R¢WrCS PE. Ooe R On PE. Frede��ck „ Sieromi PE. RaOen 9 Ko�ima� PE KenCali T �in<oin �PA �acx G S�eCC �e aoeens W Smnnem vE. Jacx C inomoson vE. A�cna�0 � Bxkman vE. Jann a Egqen. Jr a�A. UWa n Ba�a� Harry D Benossa PE. Aaio� E Aooao�� PE Cecn P Caums GE. 5lepnen G GMCarE PE. Narvey K Nammono Jr PE. S�aniey i Masi GE. Rooen D M��ie� PE. Rooert W anna GE. Man�n G Gazre^ oE Gary C Goaaman nu. Wava S�a«o PE. Gaao� H Sia�ey. Jr PE. James l Tunie Jr PE. norman � Boge PE. Jam¢s 0 Aussen vE pnlew ��e.anana w. �uama. Baion Rouge. Bosion Gpe Co�ai fL. CasO� N'Y C�sresmn SC C�arievo� �W C�mago Cie.eianC. Dauas Denvm �a+1.e�C "-. MOUSton IrWanaod�s JickSanville F� 1(ansas C�ty LOS An3P�es M��am�. M�Iwau�2P M�nnla0a�s Newar4 Of NEw VO�t OrIa�M OvHId�C GarY NS P��ad¢iC' E $¢dllle TamO�� Sa Nanila Rio de JanG�o J � � Mr. William D. Frueh Mr. Jack Schneider April 6, 1981 Page Two � �� In order to implement this study, our firm is proposing a contract amendment to the existing facillties planning agreement, which incorporates the following features. First, a general task order agreement covering the entire SSES project has been prepared. Contained Within this general agreement will be specific language which provides that our firm can only proceed a part at a time, as docu— mentation is developed to justify proceeding. The general task order agreement incorporates the cost estimate devel— oped earlier from the I/I report for grant purposes only. Actual authorizations for sub—task orders for each actual part are based on the scope developed from the preceding part. Accompanying this general task order agreeme�t are sub—task orders for the first part of both north and south side elenents. Ey dividing the project into these various parts, the City will retain complete control over the prog— ress of the project, and Nill be in a position to accurately access the scope required for each part prior to authorizing work on it. We are looking forward to discussing this further with you and the Council at the April 9th workshop meeting. Very truly yours, HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN � BERGENDOFF r .J� R � '�^�^-i�' . David R. Wright, P.E. Principal Engineer—Environmental ew ti N � � �� O J� + i U] N � (d v� U +-I F. r� N Cz 3 cz a� m �n +� s. ,-� o � �w � m � > o ..�." O S-� � 6 � 1> U' � O �5,� E O O O +-I 4-i �,-I � a� �a � � �z � o or�� ,� m ca +� a� o> o fZ y W � ti N 6 �d v .� � i� � U r-I � rn � � x s� � � � � U ri ry-I � A � N R� ,-I Q U