Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAd_Hoc_Minutes_8-7-2023Meeting Minutes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. City of Oshkosh Water Filtration Plant Clearwells Replacement Project 4 August 7, 2023 Project name: City of Oshkosh Water Filtration Plant Clearwells Replacement Prepared by: Jacobs Engineering Group (Jacobs) Location: City Hall, Room 404, 4:00 – 6:00 PM Participants: Ad Hoc Committee Members: Brad Spanbauer, Aaron Sherer, Chris Anderson, Kirsten Buckstaff, Bill and Facilitators: Jason Ellis, Mark Lyons, Aaron Dressler, Brian Schuldes, Copied: Lauren Bartelt Purpose The purpose of this meeting was to continue to gather input from the City of Oshkosh (City) Water Filtration Plant (WFP) Clearwells Replacement Project (Project) Aesthetics Ad Hoc Committee (Committee) and Committee Liaisons. The meeting presentation and informational handouts are attached to, and supplement, these minutes. Additional Project Information After James called the meeting to order, Linda provided answers to questions identified during and since the last Committee meeting. Highlights are listed below: • In response to Committee suggestions, building façade Options 3, 4, and 5 and Lake Shore Drive (North) Alternative 1 and Lake Shore Drive (South) Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 were prepared. Refer to handouts. • The City will hire a landscape architect to prepare a landscaping plan for the WFP site perimeter, for the right-of-ways of Lake Shore Drive, Washington Avenue, and Merritt Avenue for the Park Area east of Lake Shore Drive. • An inventory and condition assessment trees located east of the Clearwells was presented. • Aaron Sherer sent an email to the Committee recommending the number of trees around the plant be maximized and suggested some preferred tree species. This recommendation is included in the meeting handouts. Mark commented that some tree species are on the City’s ‘prohibited’ or ‘use sparingly’ lists. These lists will be considered in the development of the landscape design. • Kirsten submitted suggestions for review by the Committee on the following topics that are included in the meeting handouts: o Natural and anthropological history content for water-theme historical / educational signs. o Native plant, shrub, and tree species for landscaping. o Potential landscape architects including tribal design resources. o Potential grant funding sources to support shoreland restoration and related improvements. Committee Ideas and Discussion Comments on building façade options: Minutes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. • Linda said that the renderings are design concepts and that need design details, like expansion joints in the reservoir are not shown. When structural design calculations are complete, locations of expansion joints will be coordinated with exterior architectural features. Comments on Lake Shore Drive alternatives: • Steve explained the cul-du-sac shown on Lake Shore Drive (North) alternatives is the minimum City standard and smaller than the ones shown at the last meeting. • Lake Shore Drive (North) will be two-way traffic and Lake Shore Drive (South) will be one-way. • In the Lake Shore Drive (South) alternatives, parking was shown off the roadway because parking spots south of the South Reservoir on Washington were not preferred by the Committee. The minimum allowable roadway width behind parking stalls is 24 feet. • During the last meeting, it was determined that a 20-foot-wide road would be sufficient to service emergency response vehicles. It was further discussed then that some reduction in the number of parking stalls on Lake Shore Drive was acceptable to the Committee. o The Committee discussed a fourth Lake Shore Drive (South) alternative: eliminate all 16 parking stalls and construct a 20-foot-wide roadway. This alternative would be similar to Lake Shore Drive (South) Alternative 1 and was included in voting exercise at the end of the meeting. The Committee preferred the Lake Shore Drive (South) one-way direction to be north to south. o Eliminating these parking spots, particularly during a poor quality ice year, will mean that anglers will park further in the neighborhood. • Lake Shore Drive (South) alternative concepts impact existing trees as follows: Alternative #1 – 12 trees; Alternative #2 – 9 trees; Alternative #3 – 4 trees. In final design, it may be possible to wind pedestrian path around established trees to preserve them. The City’s standard practice is to either (1) avoid impacting Memorial Trees or (2) relocate them if they are small enough. • As previously discussed, the Menominee Park Master Plan (Rettler Corporation, 2012) included a conceptual plan for a new enhanced bath shelter, the addition of sand volleyball courts, and 30 parking stalls to serve park facilities. • Steve reminded the Committee that roadway changes will include 6-foot-wide terraces to provide area for accumulated snow and roadway signage. • Brad wondered if the Committee was trying to hide the new structures with landscaping and Kirsten commented that the landscaping should complement the structures and that landscaping will not completely screen views of the facilities. • Kirsten asked about street lighting and Steve responded that new roadway lighting will conform with City’s fixture standards presented during the second Committee meeting. • Brad asked about a cul-de-sac at the east of Merritt Avenue. Steve responded that a cul-de-sac at that location needs a 70-foot radius and doesn’t fit well in the available area. • It is possible to change the direction of traffic on one-way Lake Shore Drive (South) with signage for special events. • Bill inquired about curb and gutter on Lake Shore Drive. Steve replied that they haven’t yet consider the stormwater collection system changes required to support the alternative roadway concepts. Prioritizing Aesthetic Concepts During the meeting, Committee members and liaisons used a voting process to prioritize design concepts for project buildings’ façade, changes to Lake Shore Drive roadway, landscaping, pedestrian way Minutes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. information signs (water-themed historic / education feature) and WFP perimeter fencing. Committee members were allotted twice as many votes as the Committee liaisons representing City Community Development Department, Fire Department, Parks Department, Police Department, and the Water Utility. The voting results are summarized below. Refer to the current and past meeting presentations and handouts for depictions and descriptions of concepts. Action item: In addition to meeting minutes, Linda will prepare a Committee work executive summary for review and submission to Parks Advisory Board, Plan Commission, Common Council and ultimate the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. Upcoming meetings: Advisory Parks Board September 11, 2023; Plan Commission (for buildings’ architectural review only) September 19, 2023; and Common Council September 26, 2023 Water Filtration Plant Clearwells Replacement Project Aesthetics Ad Hoc Committee Meeting No. 4 August 7, 2023 2 1.Call to order 2.Review and approve minutes from Meeting #3 3.Discuss suggestions made during / since last meeting 4.Review new building façade options 5.Review updated Lake Shore Drive and Park Area Concepts 6.Prioritize Committee recommendations 7.Adjournment AGENDA Recommendations made During and Since Meeting #3 3 Can we modify building Option 2 to include an odd number of smaller bricked in windows with a keystone in the arch? –Yes, see Option 3 in handouts. Can we modify building Option 1 to include art panels, perhaps of sturgeon, instead of herringbone pattern brick square windows? –Yes, see Option 6/7 in handouts. Will the City hire a landscape architect to design WFP perimeter, Lake Shore Drive right-of-way, and Park Area landscaping?–Yes, the City is committed to hiring a landscape architect to design improvements to these areas with input from Advisory Parks Board, other City Departments, and the community. Can we review a site plan that depicts the WFP property line, the adjacent roadway right-of-ways, and the proposed fence location? –Yes, see Fencing Site Plan in handouts. Can the new pedestrian path be routed near the lake along the northern portion of Lake Shore Drive? –Yes, see Lake Shore Drive Alternative #1 in handouts. Can we review a condition assessment of the existing trees along Lake Shore Drive and information about any memorial trees in this area? –Yes, see presentation. Building Façade Options Update –See Handouts 4 Sturgeon & Wild Rice Panels 5 ©Jacobs Lake Shore Dive Concepts Update –See Handouts 6 ©Jacobs Lake Shore Drive Trees Assessment 7 Map Number Species DBH (in) Height (FT) Spread (FT)Condition Memorial Tree Comments 1 Autumn Blaze Maple 5 20 12 Good Y Healthy tree 2 Prairiefire Crabapple 4 8 4 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 3 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 12 12 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 4 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 12 12 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 5 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 12 12 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 6 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 12 12 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 7 Prairiefire Crabapple 3 8 10 Remove Bad structure- wounds 8 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 12 12 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 9 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 15 15 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 10 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 15 15 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 11 Prairiefire Crabapple Stump 12 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 15 15 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 13 Prairiefire Crabapple 4 12 12 Remove Some Dieback-wounds 14 Prairiefire Crabapple 5 15 15 Good Some wounds-Vigorous 15 Autumn Fantasy Maple 2 15 4 Good Y Planted Spring 2023 16 Autumn Blaze Maple 10 30 20 Good Y Would not Remove 17 Sugar Maple 2 12 4 Good Y Planted 2022 18 Autumn Blaze Maple 14 40 20 Good Y Would not Remove 19 Red Maple 16 40 30 Good Would not Remove 20 Red Maple 10 30 20 Good Would not Remove 21 Green Ash 26 50 40 Good Remove/Treat 22 Hackberry 22 40 30 Good Would not Remove 23 Hackberry 32 45 35 Good Would not Remove 24 Hackberry 26 45 35 Good Would not Remove 25 Austrian Pine 19 30 20 Good Would not Remove ©Jacobs Clearwells Replacement Project Aesthetics Ad Hoc Committee Purpose 8 Review options and provide a recommendations for the following: −Architectural finishes on the reservoirs and pump station. −Landscaping on WFP site and the right –of –ways of Lake Shore Drive, Washington Avenue, and Merritt Avenue. −Landscaping for the Park Area east of Lake Shore Drive. −Water-themed educational and/or historical feature for inclusion in the project. ©Jacobs Prioritize Concepts by Committee Member and Liaisons Poll 9 Vote for preferred building façade option(s), Lake Shore Drive alternatives, Lake Shore Drive and Park Area landscaping concepts, water-themed educational / historical feature, fence type. Committee members get 4 votes per topic; Committee liaisons, 2 votes per topic. Votes will be tallied, graphed, and include in Committee work summary. Marion Road Water Tower Stakeholder Committee Examples ©Jacobs Look Ahead 10 Committee Recommendations 1.Complete Committee work summary including voting results 2.Present Committee recommendations: −Advisory Parks Board September 11, 2023 −Plan Commission (for buildings’ architectural review only) September 19, 2023 −Common Council September 26, 2023 3.Start re-design with Common Council- approved aesthetic features Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations Thank you From:Aaron Sherer To:Rabe, James E. Cc:Bill Wyman; Brad Spanbauer; Chris Anderson; Kirsten Buckstaff; Lauren Bartelt; Droessler, Aaron; Ellis, Jason J.; Gohde, Steven M.; Mohr, Linda; Lyons, Mark; Maurer, Raymond; Schuldes, Brian Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Clearwell Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Date:Thursday, August 3, 2023 9:53:42 AM James, I am going to try to attend the meeting on 8/7, but it is doubtful. (My family will be driving back from a visit to my hometown in Iowa that day - an 8-10 hour drive.) I would like the following recommendation to be presented to the committee for inclusion in the final list of recommendations made by the committee: Recommendation: The maximum number of trees possible should be planted around the WFP site -- not less than 5 new trees along the south side of Merritt Ave, not less than 10 new trees along the north side of Washington Ave, and not less than 20 new trees along the west and east sides of Lake Shore Drive. The tree specimens selected should have the largest mature growth size possible given the physical obstructions of the particular location, such as proximity to buried pipes, fences, powerlines, streets, parking, pathways, etc. Trees with a vertical growth shape and ascending limb structure (such as Autumn Blaze Maple and Chanticleer Pear) should be used near fences. Native tree specimens should be selected for areas where conditions and parameters are most suitable for their growth. Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification in advance. Thank you, Aaron On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:54 AM Rabe, James E. <jrabe@ci.oshkosh.wi.us> wrote: All, After reviewing the responses to the Doodle Poll, the best fit time for the next meeting is August 7th from 4:00 – 6:00 p.m. Meeting materials will be sent out later this week. Thank you. CLEARWELLS SITE CONCEPT: ECOLOGICALLY BENEFICIAL, CULTURALLY RELEVANT Ad hoc Committee to Solicit Input on Clearwell Replacement Project Aesthetics Features Submitted by Kirsten Buckstaff 8/23, Oshkosh, WI CULTURAL LANDSCAPE, NATURAL HISTORY STUDY The City of Oshkosh has the opportunity to restore, and highlight our city’s finest natural feature: the culturally significant shoreline, and contiguous public access lands, adjoining federal waters of Lake Winnebago on South Lake Shore Dr. a. Wisconsin’s largest inland lake, and host to the largest naturally self sustaining lake sturgeon population in the world, estimated at 40,000, is deeply rooted in the lineages, history, creation, and oral traditions of pre settlement populations, ie., Woodland, and Oneota cultures and their descendants: Menominee, and Ho Chunk (Winnebago). b. Glacial Lake Oshkosh pre historic designation of the shallow, lowland freshwater lake, replenishing our water supply. c. Biology and Shoreland Habitat d. Archaeological and Anthropological heritage MESSAGING APPROACH, SIGNAGE a. Indigenous heritage; pre settlement history b. Aquatic ecosystems c. Lake health d. History of Water treatment facility, potable water e. Importance of native plantings NATIVE PLANTINGS INDIGENOUS TO EASTERN SHORE Wet meadows, shoreland, wet mesic, native grasses and sedges typifying the natural features of the site are crucial to the urban environment A site identified for Mnoomin, (wild rice) demonstration production, native rushes, sedges, and aquatic plants enhances waterfowl habitat, aquaculture, and natural filtration . NATIVE PLANTINGS, LANDSCAPE SCHEME BOUNDING WEST, NORTH AND SOUTH ASPECTS of FACILITY and CITY STREETS Contiguous, appropriate native plantings, grasses, sedges, ferns, trees and shrubs sited with respect to subterranean infrastructure, future usage, and security. Examples of low growing native species with four season interest include (common names): Serviceberry Black chokecherry Viburnum family Redtwig Dogwood Silky Dogwood Staghorn sumac St. Johns Wort River Birch Witch Hazel American Elderberry Companion plantings: grasses and pollinator attracting flowering plants Hardscaping is dual purpose: Winnebago shore stone and boulders as decorative educational features; security defense, site specific LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS; TRIBAL COLLABORATION Inviting Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs), Indigenous landscape designers, and botanists is integral to this site’s holistic vision. Cultural engagement enhances the utility, quality and ethics of the project. Exemplary of this standard: TEN x TEN Studio, Minneapolis, MN www.tenxtenstudio.com please refer to INDIAN MOUNDS CULTURAL LANDSCAPE STUDY + MESSAGING PLAN under Projects menu www.quinnevans.com design collective fostering cultural appreciation, improving environmental sustainability. Refer to Indian Mounds in project gallery SUGGESTED SITE VISIT Indian Mounds Regional Park, managed by City of St. Paul, MN 10 MOUNDS BLVD. ST. PAUL MN GRANT OPPORTUNITIES Federal, State, Municipal and private-public partnership grants opportunities exist to support projects, cost share, and fund restoration and revitalization of shoreland, and adjacent public properties. Local Units of Government (LUGs) are eligible applicants for stewardship grant programs and federal programs administered by WI DNR. Programs are subject to funds ▪ Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Local Assistance Grants - Aids for the acquisition and development of local parks - Urban Green Space (UGS) grants - Urban Rivers (UR) grants - Acquisition of Development Rights (ADR) • Federal Recreation - Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) - Recreational Trails Program (RTP) •Wisconsin Habitat Partnership Fund •Shoreland Protection Funding Refer to Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources website for contacts, program description and application Healthy Lakes and Rivers Grant www.healthylakeswi.com SECURITY P.M. detail, contract, or OPD SHARE THE AIR Tobacco, Cannabis, Vape free zone encourages respect for the site, health of visitors, litter abatement. Supports pollinators, hosts. INDIGENEITY The City of Oshkosh can REINVENT the perception of the South Lake Shore Dr. site and treatment facility, cultivating a 21st century discourse of cultural literacy, historical context, and collaboration REWRITE the narrative of shared public space REWILD shoreline and shoreland properties REVIVE a source of community, pride, and value Option 1 Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 2 Option 2 Option 3 Option 3 Option 3 Option 4 Option 4 Option 4 Option 5 CO R D S CO R D T USH 4 5 CO RD Y I - 4 1 SNELL FERNAU PACKER JA C K S O N MA I N CO R D A MURDOCK AL G O M A FO X R I V E R HIG H ALG O M A WIS C O N S I N HA R R I S O N MA I N MA I N I - 4 1 BO W E N SA W Y E R 20TH 9TH WA S H B U R N KO E L L E R I - 4 1 PO B E R E Z N Y OA K W O O D OA K W O O D OA K W O O D 9TH 20TH AVE STH 4 4 STH 91 WAUKAU STH 21 WITZEL US H 4 5 WITZEL I - 4 1 LAKE WINNEBAGO LAKE BUTTE DES MORTS PROPOSED LAKE SHORE DRIVE SITE JA C K S O N OTTER CEAPE 24TH LAKE SHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWINGS OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN TITLE SHEET TRAIL EAST OF LAKE SHORE DRIVE TRAIL WEST OF LAKE SHORE DRIVE ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ NO PARKING ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE ROAD INSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION GENERAL NORTH LAKE SHORE DRIVE ALTERNATIVES SOUTH LAKE SHORE DRIVE ALTERNATIVES 1 2 3 4 4A 5 6 FERNAU * OSH K O S H 42' 18' 24' 9' PROPOSED CLEARWELL R35' 24' 23 PROPOSED PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP PARKING STALL) EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY LINES 24' 40 ' PROPOSED 40' WIDE ENTRANCE GATE TREE REMOVAL REQ'D (TYP.) 10' 30 ' 4' R50 ' 25' ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD EXIT 02 TRAIL EAST OF LAKESHORE DRIVE ALTERNATIVE #1LAKE SHORE DRIVE (NORTH) JWF JULY 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY LINES PROPOSED CLEARWELL 24 PROPOSED PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP PARKING STALL) 8' 12' 42' 35 ' 51' 18' 24' 9' 22 ' 24' ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD EXIT 10' TREE REMOVAL REQUIRED 03 TRAIL WEST OF LAKE SHORE DRIVE ALTERNATIVE #2LAKE SHORE DRIVE (NORTH) JWF JULY 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR PROPOSED CLEARWELL PROPOSED PUMP HOUSE BUILDING PROPOSED CLEARWELL EXISTING LAKE ACCESS TO REMAIN 16 PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP STALL) ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD TREE REMOVAL REQUIRED (TYP.) 24' 24 ' 9' 18.5' EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE 04 ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE ALTERNATIVE #1LAKE SHORE DRIVE (SOUTH) JWF JULY 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR PROPOSED CLEARWELL PROPOSED PUMP HOUSE BUILDING PROPOSED CLEARWELL EXISTING LAKE ACCESS TO REMAIN ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD TREE REMOVAL REQUIRED (TYP.) 20' 20 ' EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE 04A ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ NO PARKING ALTERNATIVE #1ALAKE SHORE DRIVE (SOUTH) JWF AUGUST 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR PROPOSED CLEARWELL PROPOSED PUMP HOUSE BUILDING PROPOSED CLEARWELL ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD EXISTING LAKE ACCESS TO REMAIN TREE REMOVAL REQUIRED (TYP.) 16 PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP STALL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE 24' 24 ' 10' 9' 18.5' 05 ROAD OUTSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE ALTERNATIVE #2LAKE SHORE DRIVE (SOUTH) JWF JULY 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR 10' EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE 2' 24 ' 16 PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP STALL) 18.5' 9' R2 5 ' 24' 32' 38' 24 ' EXISTING LAKE ACCESS TO REMAIN TREE REMOVAL REQUIRED (TYP.) PROPOSED CLEARWELL PROPOSED PUMP HOUSE BUILDING PROPOSED CLEARWELL ONE-WAY ACCESS ROAD 06 ROAD INSIDE OF R.O.W. W/ PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE ALTERNATIVE #3LAKE SHORE DRIVE (SOUTH) JWF JULY 2023 BENCH MARKS - USGS NAVD 88 DATUM SHEET OF 06LAKESHORE DRIVE CONCEPT DRAWING NO.STATION DESCRIPTION ELEV.DESIGN DATE DESIGN ENGINEER PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION PLAN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN JAMES RABE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SCALE IN FEET:0 20 40 SURVEYOR EX. 24" EX. 15" EX. 24" EX. 24" EX. 12" EX. 24" EX. 24" EX. 24" EX. 12" EX. 24" 747 747 747 748 748 748 749 749 749 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 11342 750.593 MH 536870913 750.878 NL 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 5118 751.496 TO /CONC 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 752 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 753 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 754 CO 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 5502 755.570 WHE 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 756 757 757 757 757 757 757 758 758 12" SS 202.31' of 8" ??? @ 0.40% STRUCTURE - (68) STA:??? INV IN:745.82 8" W INV OUT:745.82 8" E STRUCTURE - (50) STA:??? INV IN:743.48 12" NW INV OUT:743.56 12" E INV OUT:743.55 12" S STRUCTURE - (53) STA:??? INV IN:744.34 12" N INV OUT:744.34 12" S STRUCTURE - (87) STA:??? INV IN:748.44 6" SE INV OUT:748.44 6" N STRUCTURE - (21) STA:??? INV IN:743.70 24" SW INV OUT:743.70 24" NE STRUCTURE - (38) STA:??? INV IN:745.79 27" W INV IN:745.94 12" SW INV IN:746.04 12" NW INV OUT:745.69 30" E STRUCTURE - (69) STA:??? INV OUT:746.63 8" E STRUCTURE - (6) STA:??? INV OUT:746.07 27" S INV OUT:746.07 27" E INV OUT:746.07 27" N INV OUT:746.07 18" WSTRUCTURE - (41) STA:??? INV IN:746.41 18" E INV IN:746.41 18" W INV IN:746.68 12" N INV OUT:746.55 12" N INV OUT:746.26 12" S STRUCTURE - (76) STA:??? INV OUT:748.12 12" N STRUCTURE - (20) STA:??? INV IN:744.19 27" W INV IN:746.02 8" SE INV OUT:744.19 24" NE INV OUT:746.24 8" N INV OUT:747.30 8" SE INV OUT:746.91 8" SW MH 11-817 STA:??? INV IN:746.72 18" W INV IN:747.28 6" S INV OUT:746.72 18" E STRUCTURE - (75) STA:??? INV IN:748.27 12" S STRUCTURE - (19) STA:??? INV IN:745.69 24" N INV IN:745.88 12" SE INV IN:745.34 21" W INV OUT:745.34 27" E STRUCTURE - (3) STA:??? INV IN:746.74 6" N INV IN:746.36 8" W INV OUT:746.36 8" SE STRUCTURE - (4) STA:??? INV IN:746.47 8" NW INV OUT:746.35 8" S STRUCTURE - (48) STA:??? INV OUT:747.39 18" E STRUCTURE - (18) STA:??? INV IN:745.82 24" N INV OUT:745.72 24" S INV OUT:748.54 12" NW STRUCTURE - (70) STA:??? INV IN:746.63 21" W INV IN:747.73 12" S INV OUT:746.63 21" E INV OUT:747.98 12" N STRUCTURE - (37) STA:??? INV IN:748.54 12" SE STRUCTURE - (35) STA:??? INV OUT:749.34 12" S STRUCTURE - (24) STA:??? INV IN:750.03 12" W INV OUT:748.81 12" E STRUCTURE - (12) STA:??? INV IN:748.63 24" NW INV IN:748.98 12" N INV OUT:748.60 24" E STRUCTURE - (11) STA:??? INV IN:736.20 24" E INV OUT:747.93 24" W STRUCTURE - (8) STA:??? INV IN:748.48 24" N INV OUT:748.48 24" SW STRUCTURE - (9) STA:??? INV IN:748.72 24" NE INV OUT:748.64 24" S STRUCTURE - (10) STA:??? INV IN:748.88 24" N INV OUT:748.88 24" W INV OUT:748.87 24" SE STRUCTURE - (7) STA:??? INV IN:748.38 27" N INV IN:746.08 12" W INV OUT:748.38 24" S INV OUT:749.88 12" E STRUCTURE - (33) STA:??? INV IN:750.05 12" N STRUCTURE - (14) STA:??? INV IN:748.51 24" W INV OUT:748.48 24" S STRUCTURE - (13) STA:??? INV IN:748.56 24" W INV IN:749.71 15" S INV OUT:748.56 24" E STRUCTURE - (2) STA:??? INV OUT:747.40 6" S INV OUT:747.43 6" NW STRUCTURE - (15) STA:??? INV IN:747.98 24" N INV OUT:748.82 12" W INV OUT:747.98 24" S D DD D S S S S 749.57 749.84 750.24 750.33 750.34 750.35 750.39 E 750.42 750.43 750.47 750.52 750.54 750.58 750.59 750.72 750.77 E 750.84 751.20 751.20 751.24 751.28 751.39 751.41 751.43 751.46 751.47 751.55 H H 752.25 752.38 752.44 752.46 H 753.36 753.37 753.39 753.48 753.52 753.53 753.60 753.61 753.63 753.64 753.65 753.71 753.74 H 753.84 CHIS E H 754.13 754.26 754.28 H H V 755.38 H H H H CHIS 757.23 H 757.30 757.31 757.34 757.38 H 757.46 757.50 H H V V V V V V V V V . . . . . . . CB FILENAM E: PLO T DATE: 2023\08\17 PLO T TIM E: 1:41:29 PM NORTH RESERVOIR SOUTH RESERVOIR Figure_051_691019.dgn WATER FILTRATION PLANT REPLACEMENT PROJECT WATER FILTRATION PLANT CLEARWELLS PLAN 1"=40' N 0 Scale In Feet 40'80'120' 30% DESIGN PLANT WATER FILTRATION BASIN CT/BWS WATER TANK BACKWASH WASTE FACILITY STORAGE PUMP STATION LOW LIFT VAULT METER FLOW BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. 1"0 PUMP STATION HIGH LIFT LOW LIFT & MERRITT AVENUE WASHINGTON AVENUE LINDE STREET LAKE SHO RE DRIVE FENCING SITE PLAN 10'-0" PUMP STATION LEGEND RIGHT OF WAY NEW STRUCTURES PROPERTY LINE NEW FENCE EXISTING FENCE 36'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 39'-3" 12'-6" 45'-0" FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE FENCE O N PROPERTY LINE FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE 36'-0" 36'-0" 15'-4" 14'-0" 18'-3" 18'-7" 8'-3" 7'-6" 17'-3" 7'-6" 23'-9" 23'-8" 25'-2" 58'-6"3'-4" 17'-3" 15'-11" 15'-8"15'-0" 14'-11" 17'-5" 26'-0" 10'-0" 129'-9" 146'-9" X'-X" X'-X" X'-X" ON PROPERTY LINE DIMENSION TO NEW FENCE 2'-0" MIN FROM PROPERTY LINE ALONG NEW ROUTE, DIMENSION TO NEW FENCE EXISTING FENCE ROUTE FENCE FOLLOWING DIMENSION TO NEW GENERAL SHEET NOTES BE LOCATED 2'-0" FROM PROPERTY LINE. EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN, PERIMETER FENCING TO 2. ARE FROM PROPERTY LINE. EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED, DIMENSIONS SHOWN 1.