HomeMy WebLinkAboutRoad_Salt_Alternative_Proposal_with_AppendicesRoad Salt Alternative Report 1
Proposal for Road Salt
Additives
Bryce Boughton
Blake Cottrell
Jordan Lemcke
Samantha Sprenger
Road Salt Alternative Report 2
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary 3
II. Background/Context/Problem Identification 4
III. Recommended Action 5
IV. Stakeholder Identification 6
A. Kelly Reyer (Outreach Coordinator at Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance)
B. Korin Doering (Winnebago Waterways Coordinator at FWWA)
C. James Rabe (Public Work Director for the City of Oshkosh)
D. Lisa Mick (Supervisor of Grounds and Automotives, Facilities Management)
E. Brad Spanbauer (Officer of Sustainability at UW-Oshkosh)
F. Shannon Davis-Foust (Professor of Biology at UW-Oshkosh)
G. Michelle Bogden Muetzel (Vice-Chair of Sustainability Advisory Board)
H. Allison Madison (Wisconsin Salt Wise Sustainability and Development
Coordinator)
I. Tom Otte (Solutions Consultant at Green Earth Co.)
V. Benchmarking 10
A. UW-Oshkosh - Salt Saver
B. Eau Claire, WI - Beet Juice
C. Lake George, NY - Beet Juice
D. Waukesha County, WI - Beet Juice
E. Polk County - Cheese Brine
VI. Costs 13
A. Salt Saver by Green Earth
B. Beet Juice
C. Cheese Brine
D. Sand / Granular Material
VII. Barriers 14
A. Salt Saver by Green Earth
B. Beet Juice
C. Cheese Brine
D. Sand / Granular Material
E. Public Outreach and Education
VIII. Significance for Sustainability 16
IX. Summary / Conclusion 18
X. Works Cited 18
A. Contacts
B. References
XI. Appendix A: Salt Saver Safety Data Sheet 20
XII. Appendix B: Additional Information from Green Earth Co.20
XIII. Appendix C: Geomelt Product Data Sheet 21
XIV. Appendix D: Geomelt Safety Data Sheet 21
XV. Appendix E: Polk County Report and Conclusions 21
XVI. Appendix F: Salt Wise: Community Campaign & Chloride Monitoring presentation 22
Road Salt Alternative Report 3
I. Executive Summary
This project addresses the impacts that road salt has on people, the environment, and the
costs it presents in the form of damaged infrastructure, loss of biodiversity, and decline in human
health. Conventional road salt can be a cheap de-icing agent, but it can also cause more harm
than good compared to other de-icing alternatives. The City of Oshkosh, like many northern
communities, has been seeing rising chloride levels in drinking water from salt runoff in the
winter months, which proves that there is enough salt being released into the environment to
cause concern and look into less damaging options.
The damage to infrastructure such as pitting in concrete, corrosion of bridges, rebar, and
drainage systems, and more plentiful potholes is estimated to be about $10 worth of damage for
every $1 spent on salt to de-ice the roads. This estimate on damages comes from a report that
Fortin Consulting prepared for the MN PCA in conjunction with the development of their Smart
Salting training program. Salt also causes a variety of environmental impacts including leaf
necrosis, which happens when salt spray on plants inhibits their ability to perform
photosynthesis. The high salinity concentrations near roads cause some native species to die,
making room for more salt-tolerant invasive species to move in and begin taking over. It is also
toxic, even fatal, to birds who try to eat the salt grits to aid in their digestion, but end up getting
hit by cars or have salt poisoning. The deer attracted to the salt on roads also causes a lot of
traffic hazards. The salt runoff from the roads gets into waterways, increasing chloride levels up
to 425ppm recorded in Sawyer Creek this past March which is considered “chronic aquatic life
toxicity” by the DNR. This is concerning since the EPA’s recommended chloride level for
drinking water is just 4 ppm (parts per million), or mg/L, but after a summer of not salting the
levels were still at 71 ppm last October which is concerning.
The Salt Saver liquid brine from Green Earth Co. comes in 275 gallon totes which are
$2582.25 each, averaging out to about $9.39 per gallon. Although this may seem costly upfront,
this product melts ice so effectively that salt usage will be cut in half, saving the city $100,000 to
$150,000 per year on salt. The Green Earth Co. is located in Fond Du Lac so shipping will only
cost about $75 per tote. Overall, we estimated that the city will still save about $35,000 every
year. The next option, Geomelt beet juice, costs about $1,086.25 for a 275 gallon tote which cuts
the amount of salt needed by 30%. Overall, after expensive shipping costs from the closest
location in Illinois, we estimate the city would save about $10,000 per year with this option. We
discovered that the option of cheese brine would likely be free or fairly cheap from a local dairy
operation, but the barrier to this is finding a cheese operation that has not switched to reusing the
brine instead of disposing of it. It is also important to keep in mind that the beet juice and cheese
brines can decrease oxygen in the water, but this would only be temporary.
This research hopes to gain enough support to take action by significantly reducing the
amount of salt used as a de-icing agent by adding an organic or acetate additive to the salt
already used. Both the organic additives (beet juice and cheese brine) and acetate additives (Salt
Saver brine) make the salt stick to the roads better, melt the ice faster, and will work at lower
temperatures than salt alone.
Road Salt Alternative Report 4
II. Background/Context/Problem Identification
The chloride levels in Oshkosh’s waterways have been rising, even above the EPA and
DNR’s recommended limits in some areas. Although Oshkosh has been doing well so far
monitoring the salt usage in winter and using brines, using another alternative to salt can help
immensely with mitigating salt’s impacts on the city’s water quality, plants, animals, citizens,
and infrastructure. Once the salinity of the water has a chance to diminish, aquatic species such
as fish, tadpoles, fly larvae, and others can get their population levels, behaviors, and physical
growth back to normal. However, there remains a concern for the native plants growing back
when more salt-tolerant invasive species have already taken over their territory. This may require
some restoration. Animal deaths on the roads should decline as well with less salt.
However, if this issue remains unaddressed, some terrestrial and aquatic species may be
at more risk with continuing population and health declines. The runoff and spray will continue
to kill plants on the roadsides and nearby ecosystems. The maintenance costs for potholes,
bridges, and storm drains will remain high because of the corrosion salt causes. The water
quality will also remain poor and cause possible health complications for citizens of Oshkosh.
Public outreach on these issues should be a priority as well to ensure the citizens understand the
importance of mitigating their own salt usage and using techniques such as sweeping up excess
salt to reuse as Kelly Reyer (see Stakeholders) has been teaching the public about.
Another problem we look to address is the damage done from road salt to concrete
roads/walkways and bridges, specifically spalling to the concrete, which is when the concrete
will peel, pop out, or break off, and can be made worse when applied to new concrete (Anderson
and Auster). This is caused when water gets trapped in the concrete, then goes through multiple
freeze-thaw cycles, the thaw often caused by using salt on the surface. This can be made worse
by having the damage deep enough to where the rebar in the concrete starts to corrode,
weakening the concrete and shortening its lifespan, and needing to be replaced sooner than
intended. Road salt can also be damaging to bridges, steel rebar, and the concrete on them. In a
writing done by Dindorf and Fortin in Minnesota, they estimated that per ton of salt used, it costs
about $300 in bridge maintenance from salt in either spalling, or the scaling of concrete surfaces,
or corrosion on the steel rebar.
Over the past 20 years, the cost of road salt per ton has been steadily increasing (see
graph below which James Rabe provided). Oshkosh does not have one specific provider of salt
for the city because they have multiple companies bid on the price until they get a winner. In the
past winter of 2020/2021, the price per ton hit a new high for the city at $77.10, and the price has
risen significantly in 18 of the last 31 years. With the harsh winter Oshkosh had in 2018/2019,
the city hit an overall total high of $355,705, the price being well over $100,000 in the last 15
years, and being over $200,000 in 9 of the last 11 years. Even though Oshkosh still
predominantly used dry salt on the road to get rid of ice, the city has started to use a salt and
water mixture on their roads. In the year 2016, they moved away from driving to another city for
their salt brine and invested in their own salt brine machine for $63,768.
Road Salt Alternative Report 5
III. Recommended Action
We are recommending that the City of Oshkosh adds one of the following additives to
salt in order to reduce the amount of salt used:
●A beet juice-based solution called Geomelt
●An environmentally friendly salt brine called Salt Saver
●A cheese brine
Reducing road salt use is the first step in addressing and repairing the environmental and
infrastructural damage that it has caused. Using more sand as a supplement to road salt in its
current deicing policy may also help. Additionally, we recommend that the city implement an
educational campaign on the negative effects of road salt geared toward the general public. By
providing educational materials, hosting an educational event (see Appendix E), increasing
outreach via social media (particularly surrounding winter weather events), and involving the
press in the positive efforts the city is pursuing, the citizens of Oshkosh could be motivated to do
their part to reduce their own salt use, thereby reducing the use of salt throughout the city as
well.
Road Salt Alternative Report 6
IV. Stakeholder Identification
A. Kelly Reyer (Outreach Coordinator at the Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance)
Kelly Reyer, an Outreach Coordinator with the Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance and alumni
from the Environmental Studies program at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, has been
working with the Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance for seven years to educate the public on water
pollution/runoff issues in Wisconsin. Kelly is a primary stakeholder as a resident of Oshkosh
where she is exposed to the road salt put on the city’s roads in the winter. She also has valuable
knowledge of the impacts of road salt in data collected from water sources.
Kelly believes that “monitoring needs to continue year-round and other efforts should be
made such, as macroinvertebrate sampling to see if there are impacts to these freshwater species.
Continued well monitoring is also important.” Volunteers have been monitoring Sawyer Creek
and Campbell Creek which flow into larger bodies of water. She has hosted Smart Salting
workshops which the City of Oshkosh Public Works staff have attended. Kelly seemed very
understanding of the fact that the Public Works departments have to try to find a balance between
stakeholders who are concerned about the impacts of salt runoff on waterways, wildlife, and
infrastructure, and other stakeholders who expect clear streets after snowstorms and lots of salt to
be applied.
Overall, Kelly had really great input and perspectives on road salt. She seemed to think
that Oshkosh was on the right track in trying to reduce their salt use, but believes that more
public outreach is necessary to change the public’s perception of salt use in Oshkosh. The public
needs to know the full impacts of how much salt they are using and where it ends up after it runs
off in order to understand why they should not expect streets to be cleared and salted right away
all of the time. Kelly hopes to continue educating the public on how to properly apply the right
amount of salt to their own properties as well as the importance of sweeping up excess salt after
snow and ice have melted. With more workshops, campaigns, and less salt use, these issues can
be mitigated more effectively (see Appendix E and Public Outreach and Education in the
Barriers section).
B. Korin Doering (Winnebago Waterways Coordinator at the Fox-Wolf Watershed
Alliance)
Korin Doering is the Winnebago Waterways Coordinator at the Fox-Wolf Watershed
Alliance. Korin joined the Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance about six years ago with a background
in aquatic and wetlands with a master’s degree in water resource management from
UW-Madison.
After speaking to Brad Spanbauer about what the City of Oshkosh could do to develop
more testing for chloride and dissolved solid levels, the idea was to find out what is already
being done in the Fox Valley area. Surprised to learn that testing is taking place already in seven
different locations from the mouth of the Fox River at Lake Winnebago and up to Green Bay
where the Fox River flows into the bay of Lake Michigan. After discussing more, tests are done
Road Salt Alternative Report 7
in March and April when the water is still cold so there is no algae bloom and less growth in the
water.
One barrier that Korin talks about is the education of the public and that many people do
not understand the importance of having low chloride and dissolved solid levels. If people do
understand that having these high levels is a problem, they tend to not understand the why and
how aspects of it. Making people aware and conscious of the unsustainable practices of road salt
and the issues because of it will make people want change.
C. James Rabe (Director of Public Works in Oshkosh)
James Rabe has been the Director of Public Works in Oshkosh for five years, and is in
charge of the buying, storing, and spreading of road salt on Oshkosh roads. While James does
see the damage road salt can have on the environment, wildlife, and roads and walkways, he has
described it as a “Necessary Evil” because of the beneficial effects it has on clearing ice from
roads. James also previously served as the Stormwater Utility Engineering Supervisor for nine
years, which gives him a different perspective when seeing road salt’s negative effects.
When speaking with James, one thing that he has noticed has been corrosion to
stormwater drain pipes, especially where there is some exposed pipe to the air. The exposure to
air, mixed with water and road salt, can and has caused corrosion much quicker and has
shortened the potential life that these pipes can have. James also noted that all the road drains
empty into the waterways around the city, meaning all the excess salt gets washed into the drains
and thus into the waterways.
Like our other stakeholders, James is also big on educating the public about how and
when to properly use salt. In Oshkosh, the property owners adjacent to the sidewalks are
responsible for clearing all ice and snow from the area. James also pointed out that oversalting
and using salt on newly poured concrete are big reasons there is damage to the concrete
sidewalks and grass in the area.
D. Lisa Mick (Supervisor of the Grounds and Automotives, Facilities Management)
Lisa Mick is currently in her 7th year as the Supervisor of the Grounds and Automotives,
Facilities Management at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. Like James Rabe, she is in
charge of buying, storing, and when/where to spread the salt on the campus of UWO, which can
cost between $30,000 to $35,000 per winter for our small campus roads and sidewalks.
Lisa does understand the damage that salt can have on the environment and walkways but
also recognizes how it can be helpful in a state with tough winters. Damage has been seen
particularly on concrete walkways, like leading up to the Student Recreation Center and in front
of the dorms where there is a large amount of foot traffic. And damage in the way of corrosion to
drainage systems, like the rusted drain in front of Polk Library. She stated how the university has
looked into alternatives, but it has been difficult to get the gears moving with a budget that has
been struggling in recent years and not getting much help from the University. But there has been
a slight modification the campus has tried, which has been by switching from regular grass to a
Road Salt Alternative Report 8
grass-like substitute that thrives off high sodium levels. Doing this has helped decrease the
amount of salt runoff, but not in a drastic way.
Education was also a key thing she pointed to when trying to minimize the use of salt on
campus. Being in her position, throughout the winter she will get complaints from students and
staff calling for more salt in certain areas. And although sometimes these complaints are
well-founded, oftentimes salt won't help the issues being complained about, such as snowy areas
where salt would have no effect or areas that would become more slippery by adding salt.
E. Brad Spanbauer (Sustainability Officer at UW-Oshkosh)
Professor Brad Spanabuer has spent the last seven years teaching Biology 105 and being
a sustainability officer here on UW-Oshkosh's campus. He graduated from the University of
Wisconsin-Oshkosh with a master’s degree in biology and has been practicing sustainability in
Oshkosh ever since graduating. Due to his knowledge of sustainability, talking to Brad a little
more about what the City of Oshkosh could do to become more sustainable with road salt use
and how it is affecting our water quality.
When speaking with Brad he seemed very motivated by the fact that the City of Oshkosh
does not do a good job of showing the results of chloride and dissolved solids tests done in Lake
Winnebago and the Fox River. He explains that when tests are done and the results are in that the
results are too complicated for the everyday person and he admits that he often struggles to
understand what he is reading.
What Brad would like to see the City of Oshkosh do to become more sustainable with
road salt use and to keep our water quality clean is to create two testing times. One test is done in
the fall right before the snowfall, and another test is done in spring when all the ice is gone.
Having two tests will allow more data to be collected to understand how much of an impact the
road salt is having on rising chloride and dissolved solid levels. Once the results are in, sending
out the results to residents of Oshkosh in an easy understanding format via email will make
people a lot more aware of the issue with road salt.
F. Dr. Shannon Davis-Foust (Senior Lecturer, Environmental Studies & Biology,
UW-Oshkosh)
Dr. Shannon Davis-Foust, a professor of Biology at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
has her Ph.D. in Aquatic Biology and 20 years of experience with invasive species. Since road
salt can impact native species, making room for more salt-tolerant invasive species to move in,
her expertise can be valuable to this research. Dr. Davis-Foust is a primary stakeholder because
of her expertise and experience driving on Oshkosh’s salted roads every year.
Dr. Davis-Foust sees the impacts of road salt as a threat to the biodiversity of Oshkosh as
more invasive species cause the native species’ populations to decline. She explained that
biodiversity is vital to the health of ecosystems and society since ecotourism relies on
biodiversity as well. One action suggested was to have more roadside buffers to trap and retain
runoff instead of allowing ditches to bring runoff right to the waterways. Stormwater retention
Road Salt Alternative Report 9
ponds were brought up as a possibility to control runoff as well. Planting native plants as a
roadside buffer will leave less room for invasive species to move in as well as naturally filtering
the salty runoff.
It was clear that Dr. Davis-Foust understood that road salt is a big issue impacting the
environment and society around it. She brought some great suggestions to the table which could
further help to mitigate salt impacts other than replacing it with another alternative. Since any
alternative to road salt could also have impacts on the environment, society, and economy when
spread excessively on roads, it would benefit the environment to have another barrier on the
roadside to prevent runoff from reaching the waterways as she suggested.
G. Michelle Bogden Muetzel (Program Manager, Office of Sponsored Programs,
UW-Oshkosh & Vice Chair, Oshkosh Sustainability Advisory Board)
Michelle Bogden Muetzel is the Vice-Chair on the city of Oshkosh’s Sustainability
Advisory Board, and she has a Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Policy (which she received
from UW Oshkosh). Michelle plays a key role in advising and influencing the city on sustainable
changes it can make, and she was the person to first bring road salt usage to the attention of the
board.
While Michelle is not an expert in road salt usage, her position on the Sustainability
Advisory Board and in the community make her a primary stakeholder on the matter. Her
knowledge of Oshkosh’s current salt use policy was limited, but she was eager to learn more
about possible alternatives that the city could use. She was also a strong proponent of ensuring
that any proposals to amend the current road deicing policy were thoroughly discussed with the
public works department, city managers, and any other parties involved in the process.
Many of the suggestions Michelle had regarding the reduction of road salt, in general,
came from informational emails she received from Wisconsin Salt Wise, specifically during the
Salt Awareness Week in January of 2021. Additionally, she attended some of the webinars that
Wisconsin Salt Wise offers and suggested that other members of the Sustainability Advisory
Board attend these as well. In general, as do most of our stakeholders, Michelle views road salt
as environmentally and infrastructurally harmful and would like to see the city reduce its road
salt use.
H. Allison Madison (Wisconsin Salt Wise Sustainability and Development Coordinator)
Allison Madison, the Sustainability and Development Coordinator of Wisconsin Salt
Wise, has a Master of Science in Environmental Science received from UW Madison, as well as
a graduate certificate in Environmental Education received from the University of Minnesota -
Duluth. She also has over ten years of experience teaching about environmental science and
sustainability. Although she has no stake in Oshkosh specifically, Allison’s education, teaching
experience, and professional experience regarding road salt reduction make her an excellent
informational resource and an expert stakeholder for this project.
Road Salt Alternative Report 10
From a young age, Allison has held freshwater and recreational water activities close to
her heart; it is this love for freshwater and a desire to conserve it that motivates Allison to reduce
salt use and opt for less harmful alternatives. Allison’s organization Wisconsin Salt Wise, a
partnership of various cities, counties, municipalities, and organizations, has worked diligently to
reduce salt use throughout the state of Wisconsin. According to Allison, the first steps toward
reducing salt use begin with education (for city officials, public works, and the general public),
training on best practices for road crews, calibrating equipment regularly (this alone can reduce
salt use by 40-50% within the first year), and finally implementing a salt brine solution
(salt/water solution containing 23.3% salt).
Overall, Allison seemed optimistic about her work and the potential for Wisconsin to
continue to reduce its salt use. In terms of Oshkosh specifically, she indicated that she believes
the city is off to a good start in its salt reduction efforts, and suggested further education and salt
brine additives, such as beet juice, would be a great addition to the current policy.
I. Tom Otte (Solutions Consultant at Green Earth Co.)
Tom will be the main contact for following through with ordering these products. He was
the one to give us all of the great information on Green Earth’s Salt Saver salt brine. Tom was
very helpful in providing information about available products and even provided assurance that
if the products don’t work, all unopened items can be returned to the company and fully
refunded. In addition to Green Earth being an incredibly customer-friendly company, they are
locally sourced, making for easy communication and transportation of products. Tom was able to
provide statistics regarding the usage of each of his recommended products and was able to
address concerns we had about other products we had previously considered. Additionally, Tom
examples of other universities and businesses that use Green Earth’s products, including
Marquette University and O’Hare International parking ramps. Tom is a useful stakeholder
within this proposal, as he is incredibly knowledgeable about his company’s products, and is
very attentive to the specific needs of each customer.
V. Benchmarking
A. UW-Oshkosh - Salt Saver
UW-Oshkosh received a Green Fund proposal to try Salt Saver on the campus this winter.
Green Fund is a student-led organization that funds sustainable improvements submitted by other
students. By using this product, salt usage will be cut in half. The normal 40 tons, or about
$30,000, of salt that campus uses per year will go down to 20 tons, or about $15,000 (Lisa Mick
- see Stakeholders). By using about $5,000 worth of Salt Saver and pre-treated bagged salt, the
campus is estimated to save about $10,000 per year on de-icing the roads and sidewalks. The salt
trucks will save on fuel since they will be able to go twice as far with the same amount of salt
that’s treated with the Salt Saver brine. This will also result in less corrosion and damage to
concrete since the Salt Saver contains corrosion inhibitors and is coated with potassium acetate
Road Salt Alternative Report 11
to reduce damage to grass and other plants. The Salt Saver will also be able to work in colder
temperatures down to negative 25 degrees Fahrenheit, whereas salt alone stops being effective at
just 17 degrees Fahrenheit. (Info gathered from Tom Otte - see Stakeholders). For more
information see Appendices A and B.
B. Eau Claire, WI - Beet Juice
For benchmarking research, focusing on cities that are surrounded by water and that are
very dependent on water resources in the area would be beneficial because of their similarities to
Oshkosh. The first place that seemed interesting was Eau Claire because the population size is
similar to Oshkosh and because of the importance of the Chippewa River that runs right through
the city, similar to the Fox River. In 2018, the City of Eau Claire used about 1,000 gallons of beet
juice to help melt and remove ice off of roads to make them safer to drive on. The city also used
about 53,000 gallons of salt brine and 1,300 tons of salt to go along with the beet juice. In past
years the City of Eau Claire has used a calcium chloride application before and after it snows to
not allow the ice to be able to stick to the roads, making it easier to plow. With that being said,
over time they have found that chloride levels have been on the rise with water testing being
done at the Chippewa River. With the calcium chloride that is used in road salt being the prime
suspect for chloride levels rising, the City of Eau Claire wanted to make a change. This change
was substituting the calcium chloride out for beet juice because of the many similar
characteristics of the two substances and less harm the juice will have on the environment. With
this change being fairly new, the pricing for the beet juice has been very similar but over time
will save money and the environment. When discussing the cost a little more, the beet juice can
be mixed in with the salt allowing for less salt to be used. With salt being the most expensive
option, using less salt saved Eau Claire a lot of money.
C. Lake George, NY - Beet Juice
Another benchmarking example that used beet juice as an alternative to road salt is Lake
George in New York. This place is unique and similar to Oshkosh because it is located on a
highly touristed lake named Lake Geroge, very similar to Lake Winnebago and Oshkosh. Lake
George was one of the first areas in the United States to try using a beet juice brine on its roads.
The plow crews started using the “Ice Bite” product from the company Road Solutions Inc. in
2014 and continue these practices today. The “Ice Bite” solution is also called Geomelt, which is
a natural liquid surface treatment that is an agricultural-based product derived from a sugar beet
process blended with sodium chloride brine to make a liquid for anti-icing and de-icing that is
less corrosive than brine alone. The Road Solutions Inc. is located in Indianapolis, Indiana
making a prime location for beet farmers to sell products in order to make more Geomelt.
(Technical data sheets regarding Geomelt product and safety information can be found in
Appendices A and B, respectively.) When purchasing the Geomelt, a quote can be put in for the
price that will depend on how much is needed and how it will be transported.
Road Salt Alternative Report 12
D. Waukesha County, WI - Beet Juice
Another significant benchmarking example, which also uses beet juice as an additive to
salt brine, is Waukesha County, WI. In terms of similarity, the city of Waukesha has a similar
population and area (in square miles) to Oshkosh, and both cities also have a river running
through them. Waukesha has been using beet juice, specifically the product Geomelt, as an
additive to its salt brine since 2013 (along with another additive - 32% concentration calcium
chloride). The salt brine ratio consists of 85% salt brine, 10% beet juice, and 5% calcium
chloride; the brine may be used on its own as an anti-icing method (meaning it is laid on the road
before a weather event to prevent the bond between ice and pavement) or in conjunction with
conventional road salt as a de-icing method (meaning it is applied during or after a weather event
to loosen the bond between ice and pavement and to make ice and snow more “plowable”).
According to its Winter Highway Management Plan, Waukesha pre-wets almost all of its road
salt to reduce the amount of salt that bounces off the road upon application (the only time this is
not the case is preceding a freezing rain event). Its fleet vehicles, which are calibrated every year
(or more often if needed), can spray any combination between 100% road salt and 100% salt
brine; typically, 70% road salt and 30% salt brine proves to be the most effective, though these
percentages are adjusted depending on the specific weather conditions. In terms of volume, the
vehicles can hold anywhere from 65-500 gallons of brine, and the smaller vehicles spray 8
gallons of brine per ton of salt, while the larger vehicles spray 20-40 gallons of brine per ton of
salt. Since implementing these winter road maintenance strategies, Waukesha has been able to
reduce its road salt use by 20-35% annually. (Chladil and Bussler 2015)
E. Polk County - Cheese Brine
Polk County was using cheese brine as a de-icing agent on their roads since 2008. About
30,000 to 65,000 gallons of cheese brine were used in pre-wetting techniques with salt every
year. Pre-wetting is when the liquid brine is mixed with the salt beforehand to make it stick to the
roads easier, meaning about 40% less salt is required. The local dairy operation normally would
have had to pay to dispose of the wasted cheese brine, however, the city and the operation made
a deal. The operation was able to dispose of the cheese brine for free while the city obtained it
free of charge. By doing this, the city saved up to $90,000 per year. The community has had no
complaints so far about the brine leaving behind any residue or smell. However, the brine is also
very salty and can lead to oxygen deficiencies in water sources it may runoff into. Not many
studies have been done on the effects cheese brine may cause, but it is clear that it is much better
than road salt at melting the ice faster at lower temperatures.
Polk County unfortunately no longer uses cheese brine because the dairy operation they
were sourcing the brine from was bought out and shut down. They are currently looking into
other options, but have not found any that they like as much. (See attached pdf for Polk County’s
report and conclusions) (Yaccino, Steven. “Pouring Cheese on Icy Roads in (Where Else?)
Wisconsin.”).
Road Salt Alternative Report 13
VI. Costs
Comparing the costs of each of the salt additive options, the cheese brine would be the
cheapest since the only cost would come from transportation, as it could potentially be sourced
for free if there was a nearby dairy operation willing to give away their brine, though we did not
find any around this area (see Barriers). The Salt Saver, on the other hand, is from Green Earth
Company in Fond Du Lac so it is cheap and local, cutting salt usage in half versus the 30%
reduction that organics (cheese brine and beet juice) average. The Geomelt beet juice would still
be a fairly cheap option, saving the city money as the aforementioned two options, however, it is
not located as close to Oshkosh, nor as easily sourced (see Barriers). Overall, all of these options
will save costs on infrastructure damages, the amount of salt needed, and spare some wear and
tear on residents’ vehicles.
A. Salt Saver by Green Earth
- Half the salt is needed
- Salt Saver is $2582.25 per 275 gallon tote
- 275 gallons will treat up to 91 tons of salt
- City will save $100,000 to $150,000 on salt per year total
- There will also be savings in fuel because the trucks will be able to go twice as far
with the same amount of salt
- Savings in damage costs (estimated at $10 per $1 of salt) will also be cut in half
The Salt Saver liquid brine from Green Earth Co. comes in 275 gallon totes which are
$2582.25 each, averaging out to about $9.39 per gallon. Although this may seem costly upfront,
this product melts ice so effectively that salt usage will be cut in half, saving the city $100,000 to
$150,000 per year on salt. The Salt Saver also only requires 3 gallons to be used per ton of salt so
one tote will last for about 90 tons of salt. The time spent mixing the brine with salt is estimated
to take about 20 minutes per 10 tons of salt, so this will not add too much time to the salting
process. Green Earth Co. has offered to provide free training for the salt applicators to ensure
they understand how to spread the treated salt since less will have to be used. The Green Earth
Co. is located in Fond Du Lac so they are willing to ship the product to the city. This will cost
about $75 per tote. These prices reflect the discount given if products are ordered before July or
August when demand increases. Overall, with the city using up to 4,000 tons of salt each year, it
is estimated that the city will still save about $35,000 every year by paying for the product plus
shipping since only half the salt will need to be purchased.
B. Beet Juice
- 2/3 the salt is needed
- Geomelt is $1,086.25 per 275 gallon tote
- 275 gallons will treat up to 55 tons of salt
- City will save between $60,000 and $75,000 on salt per year
Road Salt Alternative Report 14
- Savings on damage to infrastructure will be reduced by 1/3
As seen in benchmarking examples, the cost of a deicing solution will be relatively
expensive upfront but will become more cost-effective in the long run. One major supplier of the
Geomelt used in Lake George was the Road Solutions Inc. in Indianapolis, Indiana. Since this is
about a seven-hour truck drive it would be somewhat costly to travel fourteen hours to attain the
Geomelt. Paying people to drive the trucks and help load would also play a big role in cost.
Other Wisconsin cities and municipalities using Geomelt have sourced it from SNI Solutions in
Geneseo, Illinois, which would only be a four-hour drive; however, there would still be costs
associated with the transportation of the product to the city.
When it comes to the actual cost of the Geomelt, according to Waverly Industries, a 275
gallon tote costs $1,086.25. One tote of Geomelt would treat 55 tons of salt, which means the
city would need to buy about 51 totes, which would treat 2800 tons of salt and would be a total
cost of $55,398. Using Geomelt would reduce the amount of salt the city would need to purchase
by about 30%, which would be between $60,000 and $75,000 on salt per summer, which would
lead to a savings of about $10,000 per winter for the city. Similar to Salt Saver, using Geomelt
would also reduce the costs associated with damage to infrastructure, residential and fleet
vehicles, and equipment.
C. Cheese Brine
- Cheese brine is free from dairy operations
- Only cost is transportation and fuel to spread the de-icing solution estimated by
Polk County to be 0.07 cents per gallon total (see attached pdf for Polk County’s
full report)
Polk County has been using cheese brine on their roads since 2008. They made a deal
with a local dairy operation to take the cheese brine off of their hands for free, something they
would have had to pay to dispose of otherwise, and use it as a de-icer throughout the county. The
issue is finding an operation that still disposes of their brine (see Barriers).
D. Sand/Granular Material
- Average price of $9.50 per ton
- Would need to purchase more because it can bounce off the road more easily
The city of Oshkosh does already use sand/granular material, but that is only on specific
occasions when weather conditions allow, as dictated by James Rabe. It is oftentimes only used
when a large snowfall is followed by subfreezing temperatures that are too cold for road salt to
be functional. Although the sand/granular material mixture is not used to de-ice the roads, it is
still used to provide traction to roads that are slippery and could be dangerous to drive on. The
average cost of sand per ton is cheaper than salt per ton, but in some cases will have to be
reapplied if there is snow covering the ice on the roads.
Road Salt Alternative Report 15
VII. Barriers
A. Salt Saver
There are few barriers to using this product since it is sourced locally and can be shipped
to the City. It is one of the cheapest options, however, there are not as many benchmarking
examples available for this product as compared to the other options. The company still currently
works with other cities and universities, like the University of Marquette and UW-Oshkosh.
UW-Oshkosh will be using this product for the first time this winter, so the city of Oshkosh can
keep in contact with them to see how it goes. Along with that, they also offer full refunds to
customers if there is any dissatisfaction with the product or its effectiveness, but they have not
had any complaints about their products thus far.
B. Beet Juice
One of the barriers to using a beet juice brine is the sourcing of the beets. Because the
closest beet farms are in western Minnesota and eastern Michigan, and the closest beet factory
being in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Another barrier to using the beet juice brine is that it can
temporarily stain the roads and cars if sprayed carelessly. The dark color associated with the
application of beet juice may be beneficial in its ice melting capacity, but the color can also be
viewed as a downside in some regards as well. This could prove to be confusing for road crews
as they may mistake the dark roads for black ice, and subsequently reapply deicing measures.
(Terry et al. 2020) In addition, the general public may express discontent with the color of the
roads and potential staining that may occur to vehicles. Although the beet juice brine won't cause
long-term damage to the roads or cars, it could be unappealing to the city and the residents.
Though these downsides are somewhat more superficial than others, providing educational
materials for both road crews and the general public, as suggested by most of our stakeholders,
on the benefits of utilizing beet juice on the city’s roadways could help to alleviate these negative
outlooks.
One more potential tradeoff for organic additives, mentioned in more detail above, is
financial cost (see Costs). The initial purchase of this type of additive may be potentially high,
but the savings associated with reduced salt use, especially when considered with the rising trend
of salt prices in recent years, could potentially cover the costs in the long run. Additionally,
implementing an educational campaign on the harmful effects of road salt and the benefits of
reduction and safer alternatives, a little to no cost initiative, would further reduce these road salt
costs and thus cover the initial costs of the organic additive purchase.
The runoff of the beet juice brine can also cause somewhat of a problem in the waterways
because of the sugar runoff. The runoff from the brine can cause a problem because the
breakdown of the sugar in the beet juice can consume the dissolved oxygen within the water,
which is essential to aquatic life. When used in moderation and as a brine additive rather than a
standalone deicing product, however, the dissolved oxygen issue can be reduced.
Road Salt Alternative Report 16
C. Cheese Brine
Polk County was able to find an operation to source brine from in 2008. Since then, many
dairy operations have been more aware of their costs and have switched to reusing their brines by
filtering them and adding more salt when needed. Oshkosh has a few dairy operations nearby,
Knaus Cheese (Fond Du Lac) and Weyauwega Star Dairy (Weyauwega); unfortunately, these
operations reuse their cheese brine instead of disposing of it, but the city could still potentially
have a conversation with either of them about that possibility. It seems as though many dairy
operations have recently made this switch from disposing to reusing their cheese brine to save
more money. Cheese brine, being an organic material, also poses the impacts of decreasing the
oxygen levels in waterways which affects the aquatic wildlife, just as beet juice does, yet
arguably still has significantly fewer cons and more pros than salt alone.
D. Sand / Granular Material
Sand or a granular material can be a viable alternative to road salt, but it also has barriers
too. One of the main roadblocks is that road sand is ineffective and can’t be applied when there is
snow or when it is snowing because it is only useful when there’s only ice on the roads. Since it
is used just for vehicles to get traction, it becomes ineffective when snow is on top of it. Another
barrier is that if it's not mixed with some percent of salt, it can also freeze causing it to clump.
When the sand freezes into clumps, it not only becomes ineffective but can plug up the
equipment in the trucks that deposit it, making the truck useless until it gets fixed. Proper
training should ensure that this does not happen often.
E. Public Outreach and Education
One barrier that poses opposition towards a plan to reduce road salt use is that the
majority of the public would prefer to see bare roads in the winter to improve their safety while
driving. These people push for more salt use, but our research shows that adding an additive can
reduce salt use, improve the effectiveness of the salt that is used, and increase the range of
temperatures at which salt can be used. Less salt use also means that people’s cars will not rust as
quickly, and fewer potholes will be created, which will further reduce damage to vehicles.
Whichever option the city decides to go with, the public should be informed of the greater
number of benefits it has compared to salt.
Kelly Reyer, Korin Doering, Allison Madison, Shannon Davis-Foust, Brad Spanbauer,
Lisa Mick, and James Rabe (see Stakeholders) all suggested more public outreach and education
as being a priority because in helping the public to understand the issues road salt causes it will
make it easier for the city and citizens to make more decisions to mitigate their impacts. Kelly
Reyer and Allison Madison have been doing this for years already for people such as James
Rabe, the Director of Public Works, to attend. If more of these events can be hosted in Oshkosh
or more information made available and understandable for the public, such as the rising chloride
levels seen in Oshkosh’s waterways, then more action will be taken. See Appendix E for Kelly
Reyer and Allison Madison’s Salt Wise presentation.
Road Salt Alternative Report 17
VIII. Significance for Sustainability
Seeing that some of the readings are showing chloride levels above both the EPA’s
threshold of chloride toxicity of 230ppm (mg/L) and the Wisconsin DNR’s threshold of 395ppm
(mg/L) has been alarming to Kelly Reyer (see Stakeholders) in recent years. She has noticed that
salt has been showing up in the public drinking water wells, and if the levels get too high, the
water is no longer safe to consume. Salt also causes a lot of damage to the trees, roads, vehicles,
and infrastructure which she estimated came out to about $10 of damage per every $1 of salt
used on the roads.
By implementing an organic additive, meaning beet juice or cheese brine, or an
acetate-based additive (Salt Saver) as well as increasing the use of sand in its current snow and
ice removal policy, the city of Oshkosh would be directly addressing a goal in its current
Sustainability Plan, specifically goal #5 under the subheading “Street Design and Maintenance”
in the Enhance Mobility Alternatives to the Automobile; Design Safe, Efficient and
Environmentally Sound Transportation Infrastructure; and Connect to Other Local and Regional
Networks section. The goal states that the city would like to “Address polluted run-off issues
related to salt usage and other methods of snow and ice removal.” Having the city supplement its
use of traditional road salt with beet juice, cheese brine, or Salt Saver, as well as increasing its
use of sand, would not only achieve this goal but provide additional benefits to the city as well.
First and foremost, making the changes that we have recommended in this report would
directly achieve Oshkosh’s stated goal of reducing runoff pollution associated with road salt use.
The salt brine solution that Oshkosh already uses for both anti-icing and de-icing (when
combined with road salt through a pre-wetting technique) works toward this goal. However, by
combining an organic additive with the salt brine solution, both pre-wetted solid salt and brine
remain on the road longer, meaning that it’s less likely for the products laid down to runoff.
Additionally, when salt and brine remain on the road longer, less of each can be used and
therefore salt runoff is reduced even further. Another benefit to the increased stickiness of the
organically supplemented brine is higher traction for vehicles, meaning that roadways would be
safer for drivers during winter months. (Terry et. al 2020)
Not only are organic additives effective at reducing runoff, but they’re also simply more
effective at what they’re supposed to do - prevent ice from bonding to pavement and lower the
eutectic temperature of ice (i.e. the temperature at which ice forms). Conventional road salt has a
minimum effective temperature of -5.8oF, but when combined with the organic additive, the
minimum effective temperature can be as low as -45oF. This is partially due to the combination
of sugar and salt being more effective at melting ice, in addition to the dark color of the brine
being able to absorb more heat, and therefore melt ice more effectively than salt brine alone. Yet
another way these organic additives outshine road salt is in decreased corrosivity potential,
meaning that they can reduce and even prevent corrosion of equipment and infrastructure (Terry
et. al 2020)
Road Salt Alternative Report 18
In terms of environmental impacts, organic additives are markedly less damaging than
conventional road salt, although that does not mean that they come without some tradeoffs.
While organics like beet juice and cheese brine do not contribute to the chloride pollution
currently observed with continued salt use, nor do they have any observable negative effects on
roadside vegetation, the fact that they are composed of organic material means that they will
decompose; in terms of water quality, the decomposition process of the organic matter that
reaches water bodies will consume dissolved oxygen (DO), which is essential for aquatic life.
(Terry et. al 2020) Schuler et al. performed an experiment comparing the effects of road salt and
various alternatives, however, and found that while after initial use of an organic deicer DO
content decreased, after extended use the DO levels were comparable to their control variable.
(2017)
Additionally, the experiment found that any phosphorus runoff, which initially is
deposited in an unusable form, was transformed into a usable form by microbial communities.
While this could lead to an alteration of the trophic levels in the ecosystem, increased levels of
usable phosphorus could lead to increased populations of phytoplankton, which in turn could
lead to increased levels of zooplankton, and eventually lead to fewer algal blooms. (Schuler et al.
2017) Should the city opt for organic additives in its salt brine, implementing strictly targeted
applications with the organic additives as a preventative measure before major winter weather
events could reduce the overall amount that may end up in the city’s waterways.
Cleaner and healthier waterways, a resurgence of healthier native plants, a lessening of
invasive, sodium thriving plants, safer and healthier land and water organisms, longer lifespans
of roads, walkways, and draining systems, and long term financial savings for the city are all
reasons why the city of Oshkosh would benefit significantly by implementing our
recommendations. No alternative is without tradeoffs, but in this case, the benefits far outweigh
the costs.
IX. Summary/Conclusion
Conventional road salt has been damaging the waterways, vegetation, and infrastructure
of Oshkosh for too long. The city has made headway in reducing its salt use in recent years by
implementing sand and a salt brine solution, but further action can be taken. By utilizing
additional sand and implementing either an organic additive, beet juice or cheese brine, or Salt
Saver to its salt brine, something that multiple other cities in Wisconsin are already doing,
Oshkosh could reduce the amount of salt runoff that enters its freshwater ecosystems and
drinking water, the corrosivity that occurs in vehicles, bridges, and roadways, and its overall
spending on de-icing measures, both in labor and in the products used. In addition, conducting an
educational campaign targeted toward the general public on the negative effects of road salt
would mobilize citizens to assist the city in its salt reduction efforts. Oshkosh prides itself on
being a leader in sustainability; by implementing these changes to its snow and ice removal
efforts, the city would reinforce its dedication on this front.
Road Salt Alternative Report 19
X. Works Cited
A. Contacts
●Kelly Reyer
kelly@fwwa.com
920-925-1502
●Korin Doering
korin@fwwa.com
920-851-0948
●James Rabe
Jrabe@ci.oshkosh.wi.us
920-236-5065
●Lisa Mick
mickl@uwosh.edu
920-424-0033
●Brad Spanbauer
spanbauerb@uwosh.edu
920-424-1191
●Shannon Davis-Foust
davisfos@uwosh.edu
920-424-1548
●Michelle Bogden Muetzel
bogdenmm@uwosh.edu
920-424-1308
●Allison Madison
allisonm@madsewer.org
●Tom Otte
tomotteimaging@gmail.com
920-948-4635
●Wisconsin Salt Wise
www.wisaltwise.com
wisaltwise@gmail.com
●Jay Walerstein
Jwalerstein@waverlyindustries.com
317-407-9772
B. References
Anderson, Robert C, and Charles Auster. “Costs and Benefits on Road Salting.”Boston
Road Salt Alternative Report 20
College Environmental Affairs Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 128–144.,
doi:https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol3/iss1/9.
Chladil, Peter, and Bussler, Allison. “Waukesha County Winter Highway Management Plan.”
Waukesha County,2015,
https://www.waukeshacounty.gov/globalassets/parks--land-use/land-conservation/stormwater
/winter-highway-mgmt-plan-apr-2015.pdf
Dindorf, Carolyn, and Connie Fortin.The Real Cost of Salt Use for Winter Maintenance
in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Oct. 2014,
www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw11-06bb.pdf.
ICE BITE S® • Road Solution, Inc. • CPI. CPI. (n.d.).
https://cpiroadsolutions.com/product/ice-bite-s/.
Flanagan, J. (2014, January 1).Just add beet juice for ice-free highways. NCPR.
https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/23635/20140101/just-add-beet-juice-for
-ice-free-highways.
Learn, Joshua Rapp. “The Hidden Dangers of Road Salt.”Smithsonian Magazine, 2017. Web.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/road-salt-can-disrupt-ecosystems-and-e
ndanger-humans-180963393/
Mineau, Pierre, and Lorna J. Brownlee. “Road Salts and Birds: An Assessment of the Risk with
Particular Emphasis on Winter Finch Mortality.”Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006),
vol. 33, no. 3, 2005, pp. 835–841.JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3785019. Accessed 3
Mar. 2021.
Prasser, Nick, and Joy B. Zedler. “Salt Tolerance of Invasive Phalaris Arundinacea Exceeds That
of Native Carex Stricta (Wisconsin).”Ecological Restoration, vol. 28, no. 3, 2010, pp.
238–240., www.jstor.org/stable/43443247. Accessed 3 Mar. 2021.
Schuler, Matthew S., et al. “How Common Road Salts and Organic Additives Alter Freshwater
Food Webs: in Search of Safer Alternatives.”Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 54, no. 5,
2017, pp. 1353–1361., doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12877.
Terry, Leigh G., et al. “Alternative Deicers for Winter Road Maintenance—A Review.”Water,
Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 231, no. 8, 2020, pp. 1–29.Springer Nature,
doi:10.1007/s11270-020-04773-x.
Trainer, D. O., and L. Karstad. "Salt Poisoning in Wisconsin Wildlife.", vol. 136, 1960, pp.
14-17.
Yaccino, Steven. “Pouring Cheese on Icy Roads in (Where Else?) Wisconsin.”New York Times,
23 December 2013. Web.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/24/us/wisconsin-finds-another-role-for-cheese-de-icing-ro
ads.html
XI. Appendix A:Salt Saver Safety Data Sheet (See attached pdf)
XII. Appendix B:Additional options with Green Earth Co.
Tom Otte (see Stakeholders) with Green Earth Co. also mentioned that they “have
designed a way for smaller airports who can't afford a big fancy dump truck de-icing system to
have an easy way to pretreat the runway with liquid. It is a turnkey system that our friends at
Contree Sprayer in Beaver Dam supply to our customers. Turnkey cost for the sprayer system is
around $1,900 for pump, sprayers, boom, hoses, wiring/switch. (see attached photos) Green
Road Salt Alternative Report 21
Earth Co will gladly donate the first empty tote for keeping in the truck. (truck weight limits
usually don't allow for a full tote in the pickup bed.) It fits in the back of any existing pickup
truck, sprayer boom slips right into the Reese hitch of the truck. Designate an old pickup. It is
an easy installation to put it in the back for 6 months of the year. It sprays at 30 PSI to whatever
width you design between 8 to 26 feet wide. Contree will help you choose the proper nozzles for
your desired width.”
“I would recommend you look at our Super Brine which is an ENHANCED SALT BRINE. This
will Lower the melting temp even more, and the potassium acetate will hold the moisture and
keep the brine in liquid form rather than evaporating into white dust clouds on the surface. This
is great for pretreating the more dangerous curves, hills, bridge inclines. Applied at 1/2
gallon/1000 sq feet. It may not get used everywhere the normal salt brine does, but the enhanced
Super Brine could be the specialty truck tank for the dangerous trouble spots. The city of
Oshkosh could acquire it from us pre-mixed in totes. Small airports have been very happy with a
more affordable sprayer option for the smaller runways, and the city wouldn't need to purchase
new equipment. It's an easy and affordable retrofit of an old existing pickup parked in the back
lot. Super Brine price is very affordable at $1.56/gallon in 275 gallon totes. Free on board
shipping from Chilton, WI is included.” (See attached pdf on Super Brine). Tom Otte has also
mentioned that Green Earth would provide free training for Oshkosh’s salt applicators to show
them how to more effectively spread salt when less is needed to melt the ice.
XIII. Appendix C:Geomelt Product Data Sheet (See attached pdf)
XIV. Appendix D:Geomelt Safety Data Sheet (See attached pdf)
XV. Appendix E:Polk County Report and Conclusions (See attached pdf)
Road Salt Alternative Report 22
XVI. Appendix F: Salt Wise - Community Campaign & Chloride Monitoring presentation
by Kelly Reyer and Allison Madison (See Stakeholders)
Here are just a few of the slides from the Watershed Conference presentation which Kelly
Reyer and Allison Madison shared. They have some public education tips included which would
be great knowledge to share. This is meant to show what an event hosted by Salt Wise would
look like. They include more about economic and environmental impacts as well.
Road Salt Alternative Report 23
Road Salt Alternative Report 24
Road Salt Alternative Report 25
_ _ _ _ _
Page 1 / 7
Green Earth Ice Melter Safety Data Sheet
Issue Date: 07-Dec-2015 Revision Date: 12-07-2015 Version 1
Product Identifier
Product Name Green Earth Ice Melter
Other means of identification
SDS #GE50 / GE25
Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use
Recommended Use Earth Friendly Ice Melter.
Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet
Distributor
The Green Earth Deicer Company, Inc.
N8580 County Rd. QQ
Malone, WI 53049
Emergency Telephone Number
Company Phone Number (800) 528-1922
Emergency Telephone (24 hr)Chem Tel: 1-800-255-3924
Appearance Light green solid Physical State Solid Odor Slight
Classification
This chemical does not meet the hazardous criteria set forth by the 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR
1910.1200). However, this Safety Data Sheet (SDS) contains valuable information critical to the safe handling and proper use of
this product. This SDS should be retained and available for employees and other users of this product.
The product contains no substances which, at their given concentration, are considered to be hazardous to health. However,
additional component information is available in subsequent sections of this SDS.
1. IDENTIFICATION
2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
3. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Revision Date: Dec-7-2015GE-001 - Green Earth Ice Melter
_ _ _ _ _
First Aid Measures
Eye Contact Rinse thoroughly with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes, lifting lower and upper eyelids.
Consult a physician.
Skin Contact Wash off immediately with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes.
Inhalation Remove to fresh air.
Ingestion Clean mouth with water and drink afterwards plenty of water.
Most important symptoms and effects
Symptoms May cause mild irritation.
Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed
Notes to Physician Treat symptomatically.
Suitable Extinguishing Media
Use extinguishing measures that are appropriate to local circumstances and the surrounding environment.
Unsuitable Extinguishing Media Not determined.
Specific Hazards Arising from the Chemical
Not determined.
Protective equipment and precautions for firefighters
As in any fire, wear self-contained breathing apparatus pressure-demand, MSHA/NIOSH (approved or equivalent) and full
protective gear.
Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures
Personal Precautions Use personal protective equipment as required.
Environmental Precautions See Section 12 for additional Ecological Information.
Methods and material for containment and cleaning up
Methods for Containment Prevent further leakage or spillage if safe to do so.
Methods for Clean-Up No special precautions. Sweep up and return to container or wash with large amounts of
water.
Precautions for safe handling
Advice on Safe Handling Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practice.
4. FIRST-AID MEASURES
5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
_ _ _ _ _
Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities
Storage Conditions Material is deliquescent, so caking may occur with moisture and longtime storage. Practice
reasonable care and cautions.
Incompatible Materials Leather.
Exposure Guidelines This product, as supplied, does not contain any hazardous materials with occupational
exposure limits established by the region specific regulatory bodies
Appropriate engineering controls
Engineering Controls Ensure adequate ventilation, especially in confined areas.
Individual protection measures, such as personal protective equipment
Eye/Face Protection Wear protective eyeglasses or chemical safety goggles with side shields.
Skin and Body Protection Rubber gloves.
Respiratory Protection In case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment.
General Hygiene Considerations Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practice.
Information on basic physical and chemical properties
Physical State
Appearance
Color
Solid
Light green solid
Light green
Odor
Odor Threshold
Slight
Not determined
Property Values Remarks • Method
pH
Melting Point/Freezing Point
Boiling Point/Boiling Range
Flash Point
Evaporation Rate
Flammability (Solid, Gas)
Upper Flammability Limits
Not determined
116-118 °C / 240-244 °F
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Partial Decomposition
Lower Flammability Limit Not determined
Vapor Pressure
Vapor Density
Specific Gravity
Water Solubility
Solubility in other solvents
Partition Coefficient
Auto-ignition Temperature
Decomposition Temperature
Kinematic Viscosity
Dynamic Viscosity
Explosive Properties
Oxidizing Properties
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
96%
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
Not determined
8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
_ _ _ _ _
Reactivity
Not reactive under normal conditions.
Chemical Stability
Stable under recommended storage conditions.
Possibility of Hazardous Reactions
None under normal processing.
Hazardous Polymerization Hazardous polymerization does not occur.
Conditions to Avoid
Keep out of reach of children.
Incompatible Materials
Leather.
Hazardous Decomposition Products
If evaporated to dryness and heated above 900°F, acidic vapors may occur.
Information on likely routes of exposure
Product Information
Eye Contact Avoid contact with eyes.
Skin Contact Avoid contact with skin.
Inhalation Avoid inhalation of dust.
Ingestion Do not ingest.
Component Information
Chemical Name Oral LD50 Dermal LD50 Inhalation LC50
Non-Hazardous
Proprietary
Materials
= 3250 mg/kg ( Rat )--
Sodium Chloride
7647-14-5
= 3 g/kg ( Rat )> 10 g/kg ( Rabbit )> 42 g/m3 ( Rat ) 1 h
Information on physical, chemical and toxicological effects
Symptoms Please see section 4 of this SDS for symptoms.
Delayed and immediate effects as well as chronic effects from short and long-term exposure
Carcinogenicity Based on the information provided, this product does not contain any carcinogens or
potential carcinogens as listed by OSHA, IARC or NTP.
Numerical measures of toxicity
Not determined
Ecotoxicity
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Page 5 / 7
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
Revision Date: 07-Dec-2015GE-001 - Green Earth Ice Melter
The product is not classified as environmentally hazardous. However, this does not exclude the possibility that large or frequent
spills can have a harmful or damaging effect on the environment.
Component Information
Chemical Name Algae/aquatic plants Fish Toxicity to
microorganisms
Crustacea
Non-Hazardous
Proprietary
Materials
6800: 96 h Oncorhynchus
mykiss mg/L LC50 semi-
static
7170: 24 h Daphnia magna
mg/L EC50
Sodium Chloride 5560 - 6080: 96 h Lepomis 1000: 48 h Daphnia magna
7647-14-5 macrochirus mg/L LC50 mg/L EC50 340.7 - 469.2: 48
flow-through 12946: 96 h h Daphnia magna mg/L
Lepomis macrochirus mg/L EC50 Static
LC50 static 6020 - 7070: 96
h Pimephales promelas mg/L
LC50 static 7050: 96 h
Pimephales promelas mg/L
LC50 semi-static 6420 -
6700: 96 h Pimephales
promelas mg/L LC50 static
4747 - 7824: 96 h
Oncorhynchus mykiss mg/L
LC50 flow-through
Persistence/Degradability
Not determined.
Bioaccumulation
Not determined.
Mobility
Not determined
Other Adverse Effects
Not determined
Waste Treatment Methods
Disposal of Wastes Disposal should be in accordance with applicable regional, national and local laws and
regulations.
Contaminated Packaging Disposal should be in accordance with applicable regional, national and local laws and
regulations.
Note Please see current shipping paper for most up to date shipping information, including
exemptions and special circumstances.
DOT Not regulated
IATA Not regulated
IMDG Not regulated
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
International Inventories
All ingredients are listed or exempt from listing on Chemical Substance Inventory
Legend:
TSCA - United States Toxic Substances Control Act Section 8(b) Inventory
DSL/NDSL - Canadian Domestic Substances List/Non-Domestic Substances List
EINECS/ELINCS - European Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances/European List of Notified Chemical Substances
ENCS - Japan Existing and New Chemical Substances
IECSC - China Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances
KECL - Korean Existing and Evaluated Chemical
Substances
PICCS - Philippines Inventory of Chemicals and Chemical Substances
AICS - Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances
US Federal Regulations
CERCLA
This material, as supplied, does not contain any substances regulated as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (40 CFR 302) or the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) (40 CFR 355).
SARA 313
Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). This product does not contain any
chemicals which are subject to the reporting requirements of the Act and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 372
CWA (Clean Water Act)
This product does not contain any substances regulated as pollutants pursuant to the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 122.21 and 40
CFR 122.42)
US State Regulations
California Proposition 65
This product does not contain any Proposition 65 chemicals.
U.S. State Right-to-Know Regulations
This product does not contain any substances regulated under applicable state right-to-know regulations
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
Revision Date: Dec-7-2015GE-001 - Green Earth Ice Melter
_____
NFPA Health Hazards
Not determined
HMIS Health Hazards
Not determined
Flammability
Not determined
Flammability
Not determined
Instability
Not determined
Physical Hazards
Not determined
Special Hazards
Not determined
Personal Protection
Not determined
Issue Date:15-Jan-2013
Revision Date:06-13-2015
Revision Note:New format
Disclaimer
The information provided in this Safety Data Sheet is correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief at the
date of its publication. The information given is designed only as a guidance for safe handling, use, processing, storage,
transportation, disposal and release and is not to be considered a warranty or quality specification. The information
relates only to the specific material designated and may not be valid for such material used in combination with any other
materials or in any process, unless specified in the text.
End of Safety Data Sheet
16. OTHER INFORMATION
Salt Saver - Liquid Treatment
Specialized stock pile and brine enhancer
BENEFITS
•Salt Saver™ is a liquid stock pile treatment that significantly reduces the
amount of salt required to effectively de-ice your location
•Can also be added to salt in tailgate spreaders and effectively hand-mixed
in seconds.
•Makes standard rock salt work faster, longer, and to colder temperatures
•You use less salt, saving you money, and reducing the harmful effects on
the environment.
•Contains no chlorides, environmentally friendly, bio-degradable
•Does not contain beet juice or any other waste bi-products
APPLICATION
•To treat granular salt: apply 3 -3.5 gallons per ton of salt and mix evenly
or apply approx 9-10 ounces per 50 lb bag of salt to tailgate spreader and
mix thoroughly
•To make liquid “Super Salt Brine”: add 10-20% by volume to liquid salt
brine
(SAFE – Low Cost)
The Green Earth Company, Inc. – 1-800-528-1922 - www.TheGreenEarthCo.com
PDSgeo55-042414
888-840-5564
www.snisolutions.com
PNS Qualified Product
GEOMELT® 55 Liquid Organic Accelerator
Product Data Sheet
GEOMELT® 55 Liquid Organic Accelerator is a natural agricultural product that features snow and ice control
performance superior to traditional brines, but less corrosive. GEOMELT ® 55 is derived from renewable resources
providing a sustainable and environmentally sensitive alternative. GEOMELT® 55 will reduce salt application rates
by 30% and substantially reduce operating costs.
Typical Properties
Appearance Brown
Dry Solids 55% Freeze Point -40°F(-40°C)
Specific Gravity 1.275 pH 6.0 – 8.5
Wt. / Gal. 10.5 pounds/gal Water Solubility Complete
Applications
GEOMELT® 55 is highly effective salt or salt / sand stockpile treatment, prewet, anti-icing, deicing, salt stock pile
preservation treatment and bulk material freeze proofing. The suggested usage levels should be considered as
starting points and should be adjusted based on field operator experience, current local conditions and weather
expectations.
Salt or Salt / Sand Stockpile Treatment
Apply at 4-5 gals/ton (15-19 liters / metric ton) Apply at 55% solids no need to dilute with Brines
Reduce application rate 30% Prevents freezing, crusting – salt free flowing
Freeze point -40°F (-40°C) Truck and Employee can cover 30% more area
Reduce Operating Cost Reduced corrosion
Reduce bounce and scatter loss Reduce equipment replacement cost
PDSgeo55-042414
Prewet
Apply 6–10 gals / ton (21–42 liters / metric ton)** Reduce Operating Cost
Apply at spinner or auger Truck and Employee can cover 30% more area
Blend GEOMELT® 55 with Na/Mg/Ca brines Reduced corrosion
Reduce application rate 30% Reduce equipment replacement cost
Freeze point -40°F (-40°C) Increase Manpower & Equipment efficiency
Reduce bounce and scatter loss Can use gravity flow application equipment
** Apply at recommended GEOMELT® blend ratios directly related to environmental conditions
Anti – icing
Blend GEOMELT® 55 with Na/Mg/Ca brines Apply before storm event to prevent Bonding
Apply at 20-30 gals / Ln mile(47-71 ltrs / kilometer)** Prevents snow & ice bonding – removal easier
Reduced application rates 30% compared to Na Brine Truck and Employee can cover 30% more area
Reduce application rate for Frost protection - bridges Increase Manpower & Equipment efficiency
Residual will last 4-6 days Reduced corrosion
** Apply at recommended GEOMELT® blend ratios directly related to environmental conditions
PDSgeo55-042414
Deicing
Blend GEOMELT® 55 with Na/Mg/Ca brines Allow product to penetrate – breaking bond to road
Apply at 50-60 gals / Ln mile( 190-225 ltrs / kilometer)** Burns through hardpack to break bond with road
Breaking bond makes removal easier
** Apply at recommended GEOMELT® blend ratios directly related to environmental conditions
Salt Stock Pile Preservation Treatment
Bulk Material Freeze Proofing
Apply at 4-5 gals/ton (15-19 liters / metric ton) Freeze proof bulk materials, sand, aggregates
Apply at 55% solids no need to dilute with Brines Can top coat salt with spray at 0.5 gal/yd2
Prevents freezing, crusting – salt free flowing Apply top coat spray with two applications
Prevents hardening over summer Non – Chloride, environmentally acceptable
Will not waste rock salt due to hardening Reduced corrosion
GEOMELT®55 is produced under U.S.Patent #6,080,330, additional Patents Pending.
The information and recommendations in this publication are to the best of sellers knowledge, accurate. However because of numerous factors
affecting test results, seller makes no warranty of any kind, express or implied other than product conforms to its applicable current standard
specifications. Statements concerning the use of the products or formulations described herein are not to be construed as recommending the
infringement of any patent.
GEOMELT®USA Approved 04/24/14
SDSGeomelt55-062314
5616 Progress Road Indianapolis, IN 46241 1(888)888-3615
www.CPIRoadSolutions.com
Safety Data Sheet
SECTION 1 – Identification
Product: GEOMELT® 55 anti-icing/deicing fluid (Previously called ICE BITE 55)
Chemical Name: Trade Secret
Formula: Proprietary
Manufacturer: SNI Solutions
24-Hour Emergency Assistance: 888-840-5564
SECTION 2 –Hazard(s) identification
NFPA Identification - GEOMELT® 55 Health – 0, Fire – 0, Instability - 0.
NFPA – Hazard Identification: This system identifies the hazards in three categories: Health, Flammability and
Reactivity and indicates the order of severity ranging from 4 indicating a severe hazard to 0 indicating no special hazard.
SARS-EPA SARA Title III Hazard Categories: 1-Fire Hazard, 2-Sudden Release of Pressure, 3-Reactive, 4-Immediate
(Acute) Health Hazard, 5-Delayed (Chronic) Health Hazard.
SECTION 3 – Composition / information on ingredients
Composition : Trade Secret Ingredients ; Trade Secret
SECTION 4 – First Aid Measurers
Emergency and First Aid Procedures:
Ingestion: If ingested seek medical supervision.
Skin Contact: Wash skin with water and mild soap. If irritation occurs, seek medical attention.
Eye Contact: Flush eyes with plenty of water for 30 minutes. Get medical attention if warranted.
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air. Seek medical attention if irritation persists.
SDSGeomelt55-062314
SECTION 5 – Fire – Fighting Measurers
Flash Point (Method Used): Not applicable
Flammable Limits: LEL – not applicable UEL – Not applicable
Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Wear proper fire - fighting equipment
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: None
SECTION 6 – Accidental Release Measurers
Material is Released or Spilled: All spills should be contained and picked up with earthen or other absorbent material
and placed in suitable container.
Waste Disposal Method: Follow Local, State, Federal regulations.
SECTION 7 – Handling and Storage
Precautions Handling and Storing: Spilled material may be slippery. Clean up spills completely before walking in the
area of spillage.
Other Precautions: Follow Local, State and Federal regulations.
SECTION 8 – Exposure Control / Personal Protection
Personal Protective Equipment: Protective clothing, gloves and safety eyewear protection are not required, but
recommended. Use appropriate NIOSH-approved respirator when needed. Respirator selection must be based on
contamination levels found in the work area. Comply with OSHA standards 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory Protection and
29 CFR 1910.1000 Air contaminants Permissible Exposure Limits. Eyewash and Safety Shower should be available.
Follow good housekeeping and manufacturing practices.
Ventilation: Use general or local exhaust ventilation to meet OSHA PELS or ACGIH TLV requirements.
SECTION 9 Physical and Chemical Properties
Boiling Point (F): Not Available Specific Gravity (H2O=1): ~ 1.275
Vapor Pressure (mmHg): Not available Evaporation Rate (n-BuAc=1): Not available
Vapor Density (Air=1): Not available Melting Point: Not available
Solubility in Water: Complete pH: ± 6.0 – 8.5
Appearance and Odor: dark aqueous solution; sweet odor
SECTION 10 – Stability and Reactivity
Stability: Stable
Conditions to avoid: None
Incompatibility: (Materials to Avoid): May corrosive to light metals.
Hazardous Decomposition Products: Thermal decomposition may produce oxides of carbon.
Hazardous Polymerization: Will not occur.
SDSGeomelt55-062314
SECTION 11 Toxicological Information
Product Ingredients not listed in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Report on Carcinogens or has been
found to be a potential carcinogen in the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs, or by
OSHA.
Route(s) of Entry: Inhalation – none. Skin – unlikely. Eyes – yes. Ingestion – unlikely.
Carcinogenicity: NTP – no. OSHA –no.
Threshold Limit Value: See Section II
Acute Oral Toxicity (rat): Low acute oral toxicity; LDL50 for rats is >5 g/kg.
Skin Contact: May cause irritation.
Eye Contact: May be irritating to eyes.
Inhalation: None
Effects of Overexposure: Acute signs and symptoms as listed.
SECTION 12 – Ecological Information
Non Mandatory – Regulated by Other Government Agency.
Investigate Local, State and Federal Regulations.
SECTION 13 – Disposal Considerations
Non Mandatory – Regulated by Other Government Agency.
Investigate Local, State and Federal Regulations.
SECTION 14 – Transportation Information
Non Mandatory – Regulated by Other Government Agency.
Investigate Local, State and Federal Regulations.
SECTION 15 – Regulatory Information
Non Mandatory – Regulated by Other Government Agency.
Investigate Local, State and Federal Regulations.
SECTION 16 – Other Information
SNI Solutions – SDS Document review and approval date: 06-23-14
The information contained herein is furnished without warranty of any kind. Employees should use this information only as
a supplement to other information gathered by them and must make independent determinations of suitability and
completeness of information from all sources to assure proper use of these materials and the safety and health of
employees.
Green Earth Super Brine
Enhanced Liquid Salt Brine
Salt Brine is sodium chloride in liquid form.
BEST USES:
•As a proactive approach, used as an anti-icer before the snow event
•As a de-icer after snow removal, apply to the ice that has bonded to the
pavement surface underneath
•As a pre-wetting treatment to standard granular rock salt spreading
BENEFITS of Green Earth Super Brine
•Brine is enhanced with our Salt Saver™, which is a liquid treatment that
significantly reduces the amount of salt required to effectively de-ice your
location
•Salt Saver, with a freezing point of -60°C, is added to the salt brine to
bring working temperatures way down, and to increase the performance
and longevity, beyond other brines. It also lowers the potential of black ice
from forming.
•Very fast acting. Granular de-icers have to dissolve first into liquid, where
as liquid brine works on contact.
•Less applications are needed, reducing labor costs
•Non-tracking, safer for the environment, safer for plants & vegetation, and
less corrosive due to Salt Saver's corrosion inhibitors
•Green color that is photosensitive and non-staining, it fades with light
•Does not contain beet juice or any other waste bi-products
APPLICATION
•As an ANTI-ICER: approx ½ gallon per 1000 Square Feet
•As a DE-ICER: approx 1-3 gallons per 1000 Square Feet, depending on
ice thickness
(SAFE – Low Cost)
The Green Earth Company, Inc. – 1-800-528-1922
www.TheGreenEarthCo.com