Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES March 19,2019 PRESENT: Steve Cummings, Thomas Fojtik, Michael Ford, Derek Groth,John Hinz,John Kiefer, Andrew Mott, Thomas Perry, Kathleen Propp, Robert Vajgrt EXCUSED: Ed Bowen STAFF: Darryn Burich, Planning Director;Steve Gohde,Assistant Director of Public Works; Mark Lyons, Principal Planner;Jeff Nau, Associate Planner;Alexa Naudziunas, Associate Planner; Brian Slusarek, Assistant Planner; Steven Wiley,Assistant Planner;Mina Kuss, Recording Secretary Chairperson Fojtik called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present. The minutes of March 5, 2019 were approved as presented. (Vajgrt/Hinz) I. GRANT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AT 17 WASHINGTON AVENUE (300 EAST PARKING LOT) Site Inspections Reports: No commissioners reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant is requesting the granting of a public utility easement for AT&T at the city-owned 300 Block East Parking Lot. Mr. Nau presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the reason for the easement. The applicant initially proposed to extend an existing conduit running from Washington Avenue south approximately 80 feet. There is no easement in place for this utility. Staff opposed this option as placing an easement through the middle of the parking lot could interfere with reconstruction of the parking lot at a later date. A second proposal had an easement along the west property line of the parking lot property adjacent to the Exclusive Company building. Again, staff had concerns regarding this as it could interfere with reconstruction and potentially block the rear entrance of the Exclusive Company if AT&T were installing or performing maintenance on its facilities. The City recommended a ten-foot wide easement along the periphery of the parking lot adjacent to Washington Avenue and State Street. In addition to AT&T, the easement will be available to other utility providers, similar to public utility easements placed on plats and Certified Survey Maps. Mr. Fojtik opened technical questions to staff. Plan Commission Minutes 1 March 19,2019 There were no technical questions on this item. Mr. Fojtik asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. There were no statements from the applicant There were no public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Hinz. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carried 9-0. II. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AT THE NORTH 1600 BLOCK OF OSHKOSH AVENUE Site Inspections: Report: No commissioners reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant requests the acceptance of street right-of-way on the north side of the 1600 Block of Oshkosh Avenue. Mr. Nau presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area. The City of Oshkosh is requesting a right-of-way dedication to widen Oshkosh Avenue. This dedication is required for proposed improvements and revitalization of the Oshkosh Avenue Corridor. The proposed Oshkosh Avenue right-of-way widening will dedicate approximately 5,213 square feet of area along the north side of Oshkosh Avenue approximate 240 feet east of N. Westfield Street. The dedicated area as planned is 24 feet wide by approximately 217 feet long and will make this section of Oshkosh Avenue a 90-foot right-of-way. This is similar to the right-of-way dedication actions in 2018 west of this site where the extra width was required for the redesign of Oshkosh Avenue. The proposed widening will also make Oshkosh Avenue compliant with the city's Comprehensive Plan which recommends arterial-classed streets such as Oshkosh Avenue having a minimum 80- Plan Commission Minutes 2 March 19,2019 foot right-of-way. The proposed 90-foot wide right-of-way will accommodate four-lane streets, turn lanes and provide area for public sidewalks and ample terrace area for terrace trees and snow storage. Mr. Fojtik opened technical questions to staff. There were no technical questions on this item. Mr. Fojtik asked if there were any public comments. There were no public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments. Motion by Ford to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Propp. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carried 9-0. III. INDUSTRIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE TO ALLOW FRONT FACADES COMPOSED OF LESS THAN 15 PERCENT CLASS I MATERIALS AT 3740 FISK AVENUE Site Inspections: Report: Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the City's Industrial Design Standards to allow front facades composed of less than 15 percent Class I materials at 3740 Fisk Avenue. Mr. Wiley presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. In 2018, the petitioners constructed a new addition to the existing office/customer training facility. The petitioners used metal wall panels to clad the new building. Plan Commission approved a design standards variance request at its July 17, 2018 meeting to allow the use of the metal cladding. The metal paneling at the base has started to deteriorate and rust due to age and salt during the winter months. The applicant is proposing to remove metal paneling at the base of the original building and replace it with precast panels. The panels would run along the Fisk Avenue (south)facade and along the South Washburn Street Plan Commission Minutes 3 March 19,2019 (east)facade. The intent is to enhance the attractiveness of the building and improve the resistance to penetrating rust. Mr. Fojtik opened technical questions to staff. Ms. Propp inquired about the panel color on the building because it is gray on the submitted images from the applicant but the current color of the building is red. She was curious if they planned on changing the color. Mr. Wiley replied he was not aware of the applicant changing the color. Ms. Propp stated she is concerned with compatibility. Mr. Fojtik asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. There were no statements from the applicant There were no public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Propp to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Vajgrt. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Ms. Propp stated she is still concerned with the compatibility of the color scheme. Mr. Burich replied they could inquire about it but the submission from the applicant does show gray. Mr. Lyons suggested adding a condition regarding compatibility. Ms. Propp said she would like that. New condition to state: The precast panels shall be a similar and complimentary color to the metal wall panels. Motion carried 9-0. Plan Commission Minutes 4 March 19,2019 IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 3054 W. 20TH AVENUE Site Inspections: Report: Ms. Propp and Mr. Cummings reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant requests approval of a General Development Plan to allow for a multi-family development located at 3054 W. 20th Avenue. Mr. Lyons presented the item, reviewed the site and surrounding area, land use and zoning classifications in this area. He explained this item was laid over from the February 19,2019 Plan Commission meeting due to concerns about the access drive. The applicant is looking to purchase the property and construct a new multi-family development. The applicant is seeking to construct three 42 unit buildings that are 45' feet tall and include 42 grade level parking spaces within the buildings. The proposed buildings are a mixture of 21 one bedroom units and 21 two bedroom units. The development is significantly below the allowed density. The applicant has revised the access drive location to help mitigate some of the concerns raised during the 2/19/19 Plan Commission meeting. They have increased the distance from the adjacent CBRF from approximately 22' to 46'. The applicant has also revised the site plan to move the western most building further from the adjacent CBRF development. The proposed buildings are a mixture of pre-cast concrete panels clad in brick or stone accents. The upper floors are clad in two colors of horizontal lap siding with a horizontal transition board in complimentary colors. The windows are traditional sash style. The apartment also features a private deck with an extended gable roof canopy. Mr. Lyons stated since Mr. Bowen could not attend,he sent an e-mail on his opinion of the development. Mr. Fojtik opened technical questions to staff. Ms. Propp asked how far to the east the new driveway extends. Mr. Lyons pointed how far it went on an aerial photo. Ms. Propp asked if the private road would remain. Mr. Lyons explained the current gravel road would be removed but would still need to be accessible by the Department of Public Works because of the underlying utilities/easement. He stated the whole driveway would shift over. Mr. Fojtik inquired about enhancing the building. Mr. Lyons replied it would be reviewed during the Specific Implementation Plan process. Mr. Perry stated he appreciates the modification but still hates the straightaways. Plan Commission Minutes 5 March 19,2019 Mr. Hinz inquired about the floodway. Mr. Lyons explained some of the floodway shown in the map may will be changing due to new data. Mr. Burich mentioned creating a Letter of Map Amendment) LOMA for the area. Mr. Gohde confirmed what Mr. Lyons and Mr. Burich stated. Mr. Kiefer asked what the width of the access drive was and if it could be possible to add more lanes. Mr. Lyons replied it is currently 24' wide and could be 30' wide at the maximum. Mr. Gohde stated it would need to be 36' wide to have the extra lane. Mr. Cummings said during his sight inspection,he noticed the surrounding buildings were only one story. He commented the architecture is not visually appealing but understands it is not the final product. Mr. Fojtik asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Mark Mertens (applicant), 420 Concord Drive of Brookfield, said he was available to answer any questions. Ms. Propp asked if this was the furthest the driveway could possibly go to the east. Mr. Mertens replied it was. He explained there were three other alternatives but due to utilities and wetlands, this was the best they could do. Mr. Kiefer asked if the 36' wide access drive was an option. Mr. Mertens replied it was never discussed but could be a possibility. Mr. Burich said the wider driveway is usually done with commercial properties but usually not residential where there is not as much traffic. Mr. Lyons stated the applicant provided a video of site in Holmen. He played the video. Mr. Hinz asked about the placement of the air conditioner units. Mr. Mertens explained they are in a different location than in the video. Plan Commission Minutes 6 March 19,2019 Mr. Burich explained to Mr. Mertens that the facades would have to be enhanced for the Specific Implementation Plan process. He said there are many options that could help enhance them which would be discussed with staff. John Shuster, 2214 Omro Road, said he is here with Linda Carlson. He said they reviewed the revised plan and felt it did not resolve any of the original concerns. He stated Ms. Carlson's facility is a licensed Alzheimer and Dementia care facility which is a sensitive population to traffic volume. He is still concerned about the extra traffic on W. 201h Avenue. He mentioned he had talked to other apartment developers. He stated vehicles do not leave just once a day but usually three to four times a day which would lead to about 800 vehicles a day utilizing the access drive. He stated the proposed buildings would change the entire look of the area. He said he still has concern about wetlands and the buildings that would tower over Ms. Carlson's facility. He stated he still wants to know what order the buildings would be built in. He reiterated that the revised plan did not mitigate any of the original concerns. Linda Carlson, 1019 E. Irving Avenue, stated her concerns have not been relieved. She said the minor changes did not resolve anything. She said there would be increased traffic and her residents need the serenity. She stated she is a licensed Alzheimer and Dementia facility of 50 residents. She stated the area is a great place for a nature trail and wildlife but there is a lot of wetlands. She stated she feel as if she has to be an advocate for her residents. She recalled a Plan Commission member stating that patients do not just sit indoors all day which they do not. She said the development would add 256 cars to the neighborhood. She stated there are about 80 residential properties that do not know about this proposal and should be notified. She said this developments does not fit in with the area and it is not compatible. She said it is also not safe for her residents. Dennis Zack, 2121 Morningstar Lane, explained that he moved here from the village of Howard. He introduced his family and explained that they moved here to be closer to his job. He said between the school and the YMCA, there is already a heavy amount of traffic. He said he was disturbed when he heard about this development and it wouldn't do any good for Oshkosh. He stated how much he loves the area and would like to keep it the way it is. He feels the apartments would slow down the residential housing market in the area. He questioned if there was even a need for apartments in Oshkosh. Michelle Zack, 2121 Morningstar Lane,explained why she picked this location to live in. She said people want to live in the area but the traffic is not safe. Tammie Kempf, 1829 Vinland Street, stated she understands how dangerous the traffic can be in due to a vehicle accident she was involved in by Traeger. She said it is crazy to add more traffic to the area and that there are children in the area all times of the day. Austin Laferty,3390 Casey Trail, said he is here with his wife. He stated this is the best area in Oshkosh and they just moved to the area in October. He stated there are about 80-90 residents that should have been notified about the proposal. He said the apartment complex will lower the property values. He stated there are other locations in Oshkosh where this apartment complexes Plan Commission Minutes 7 March 19,2019 could be built. He said anyone is welcome to his home to see that the apartment complexes are not compatible with the area. Jon Petri, 3501 W. 20ffi Avenue, said these are all valid concerns from the neighbors. He feels the developments is not safe and would increase break-ins and theft. He stated it is also unsafe for the children. Grete Engel, 949 Glenview Avenue of Wauwatosa, stated she is here representing her client. She stated some of the concerns they have are related to wildlife in the area, water management, floodplain and safety concerns. She stated the development would be disruptive to the calm environment. Wayne Wegenkie, 20320 W. Mill Creek Trail of New Berlin, stated he owns the land and development the CBRF. He said Ms. Carlson used to be his tenant. He said the original intent was for condos but his partner passed away. He said he has built 50 similar buildings like the CBRF which are next trains, apartments and so on and it has never been an issue before. He stated the CBRF is almost soundproof inside and that CBRFs work very well next to apartments. Paula Harvot, 3351 W. 201h Avenue, stated she is here with her husband. She stated she is against this type of complex because it ruins the quality of life and hurts the property values. She questioned if there was even a need for apartments in Oshkosh. She had multiple questions relating to density of condo, size of units, cost, parking spaces, sidewalks, wildlife, school, recreation areas and so on. She stated she also has concerns relating to safety, traffic,wetlands, mental health and green space. Renne Richards Groff, 3256 W. 201h Avenue, stated she was concerned before the meeting and now she is even more concerned. She stated the speed limit is never followed and W. 201h Avenue is literally a drag strip. She says no one slows down for the school. She said anyone is welcome to her place to see what she is talking about. She also thought the buildings were not architecturally appealing. Nancy Bongert, 3374 W. 201h Avenue, said the development is right in her backyard. She read from the staff report about the 42 unit per building Base Standard Modification and commented it is an absurd request. She stated she is a good neighbor but does call the city once a year to get the grass mowed on the vacant parcel. She said the traffic is terrible and would welcome the condo development. Mike Blank, 2139 W. College Avenue of Appleton, said he is the developer of Sunrise Estates. He said he would like to see lower density and has the same concerns about traffic. Jeff Hafemeister, 3249 W. 201h Avenue,explained where the wetland is in the area. He said half the parcel is buildable and does not believe the proposed development is possible due to the wetlands. He thinks going from 12 units to 42 units is madness. He believes people will be parking their cars on other people's lawn and the extra 250 cars to the area is a low estimate. He said this is a rural Plan Commission Minutes 8 March 19,2019 area and this proposal is heading in the wrong direction. He said he cannot stop progress but would prefer the single family homes like what Cypress Homes started in the area. Chad Robertshaw, 2150 Morningstar Lane, stated he was at the last meeting. He said the developer and the owner are the only supporters of this development. He said there are no supporters from the neighborhood. He spoke about the increase of 250 cars and said it is a 500% increase of traffic. He warned Plan Commission about children getting hit by vehicles if this is instated. Doug Bossart, 12648 Sherwood Drive of Leawood, Kansas, said he is one of the owners of the assisted living facilities. He stated Carl Traeger is filled to the maximum. He said the school has already reached out to the applicant to let them know that none of the children from the apartments would be able to attend the school. He said he should have never built in the area due to the wetlands. He said it is the third year in a row the floor in the living room has buckled up due to the water pressure. He stated the entire land is swamp land. He also said the walls are cracking. He said these are three unappealing buildings and it will damage nearby businesses. Olivia Zack, 2121 Morningstar Lane, commented to not put the buildings up. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Propp to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Ford. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Ms. Propp asked what the zoning was for the parcel to the east and if there was a plan for development. Mr. Burich replied it is zoned for multi-family/MR-12 and there are no plans yet. Mr. Cummings stated that Oshkosh is not diverse in housing in all price points. He explained the city is landlocked and has limited options for more housing. He said people want newer homes but there are not many places to build anymore. He stated the development is not affordable housing. He said it would be ideal to keep young families in Oshkosh. He said long-term,he would like to see the site as single family. He asked if the school was aware of the development. Mr. Burich replied they were. Mr. Cummings said he would like to keep families here. He stated he cannot support this request due to the integrity of the neighborhood and believes it should be land for single family residents. Plan Commission Minutes 9 March 19,2019 Mr. Perry asked if it was possible to add a condition about speed bumps. Mr. Burich replied it would. Mr. Perry said he feels obligated to support but this but is not convinced about the health and safety aspect of this development, therefore,he will be voting no. Mr. Hinz explained this is only the General Development Plan(GDP)but he does not accept the design of the buildings as they are now. He is concerned with the impact in property values. He hoped there was a better way of moving the driveway and does agree about the high traffic in the area. He said he would vote yes to the GDP but would be harder on the applicant during the Specific Implementation Plan process. He hopes there is a way to move one of the buildings further from the CBRF. Mr. Vajgrt said he would vote for this if it were a two-story maximum but not a four-story as proposed. He stated he does prefer the condos and single family. He said he will be voting no to this item. Mr. Kiefer stated he lives in the Fox Chase area. He said he bought in the area just like the neighbors did. He is aware of the traffic issues. He stated he will not be voting for this because it is not compatible with the neighborhood. He said it would be harder to sell lots with apartments nearby. He mentioned he started a neighborhood association in the area. Ms. Propp said it is zoned for multi-family and will not have single family. She stated she does not like the road and is bothered by the four story,therefore, she will be voting no. Mr. Ford asked if the height of the buildings was allowed. Mr. Lyons replied it was. Mr. Ford stating it is not for Plan Commission to decide on certain items but the need for this type of housing is there. He said safety is not a concern for him but the character compatibility is. He said the transition to single family is harsh and he will also be voting no. Mr. Hinz questioned if the request was approved, if the buildings could still downsize. Mr. Burich replied Plan Commission would be approving the concept plan of four stories if approved. Mr. Hinz stated he would also be voting no. Motion denied 1-8 (Ayes:Fojtik. Nay: Cummings, Ford, Hinz, Kiefer,Mott, Perry, Propp, Vajgrt). Plan Commission Minutes 10 March 19,2019 V. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT (SMU) TO SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SMU-PD),APPROVAL OF A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2625 S. WASHBURN STREET Site Inspections: Report: Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU)to Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD). The applicant also requests approval of General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan to allow for a contractor yard/office use. Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing car dealership to a headquarters for a full-service remediation contractor (Aquire Restoration), currently located at 2721 Oregon Street. The existing building on the site will be used to store the contractor's equipment, tools and company vehicles. The rear warehouse portion of the building will be used for storage of these items and accessed via overhead doors on the north and south sides of the building. The proposed storage use (contractor yard) is not permitted in the Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU), therefore, the applicant is requesting a zone change to include a Planned Development Overlay. The applicant plans to remove a large portion of the existing asphalt parking lot and restore to green space/landscaping and remove all gravel areas at the rear of the lot and restore to green space. The remaining asphalt parking lot will be milled and resurfaced and concrete aprons replaced as they are currently in poor condition. The site plan for the resurfaced parking lot indicates 11 total parking spaces for customers/employees in front of the building. No major changes are being proposed to the existing building. The applicant does plan to replace the roofing as the existing roofing is failing,repaint the exterior of the building to a light grey color and the mansard on the front of the building will be painted a navy blue color. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. Mr. Perry asked to see the street view. Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Jeff Edmunds (applicant), 1609 Weyerhorst Road, said he resubmitted his lighting plan but there is an area about 10 feet wide at the south driveway that does not meet the foot-candle requirement. He said he is removing six light poles and will reduced the lighting throughout the area but could not get that 10 foot span to meet code. He asked for a Base Standard Modification for that area. Ms. Propp inquired about Mr. Edmund's narrative regarding future mini-warehousing. She was curious about access to the parcels behind Mr. Edmund's property because they look landlocked. Plan Commission Minutes 11 March 19,2019 Mr. Edmunds replied it is a long term plan to own the two parcels behind his property. He explained there is an easement that leads to the parcels. Mr. Burich showed Ms. Propp the location of the access point on the aerial photo. Mr. Edmunds said they do not plan on storing any equipment outside. He said their current location is on 2721 Oregon Street which he has drastically improved the site since he has owned it. He said the proposed subject site has 15 overhead doors and would allow him to store all the company vehicles indoors nightly. There were no other public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Hinz to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Uajgrt. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Ms. Propp and Mr. Fojtik both commented this is going to be a significant improvement for the site. Mr. Burich asked if Plan Commission wanted to grant the Base Standard Modification for lighting as requested by the applicant. Mr. Lyons explained different options for wording of the condition. New condition to state:Base Standard Modification to allow the southwest corner of the western most driveway along the south property line to have a minimum intensity of lighting below the 0.4 foot-candle requirement. Motion carried 9-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AN ART STUDIO AT 16751677 OREGON STREET Site Inspections: Report: Mr. Hinz and Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. Plan Commission Minutes 12 March 19,2019 The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to establish an art studio at 16751677 Oregon Street. Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. According to the applicant, the business (Birch Art Gallery and Classes)will include art classes and gallery. It will be solely operated by the owner/applicant. The business will be seasonal, open April through November, Wednesday through Saturday. Art classes will be conducted 9-11 AM with the gallery open 11:30 AM-4:30 PM. The classes are expected to have 6-8 students (ages 21 and over) with private lessons available upon request. The application states that there will be no changes made to the site, other than updating the front of the building with new paint,new signage and a picnic table on the grassed area to the northwest of the building. The existing parking area on the lot has 10 stalls that can be used for customer parking. The proposed art studio use is an appropriate use for this site as it should have a relatively low impact on the surrounding area. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. There were no technical questions on this item. Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Barbara Schneider (applicant), 111 E. Ripple Avenue, said she will own the property if the Conditional Use Permit is approved. She said this would be a place where people can sell,buy and see artwork. She explained it is only opened seasonally from April to November. She stated this studio has always been a goal of hers but she never had enough time for it until now. Mr. Perry asked if there was going to be a hot shop class for glass blowing. Ms. Schneider replied there will not be because it requires a furnace and is dangerous but suggested Milwaukee or Madison for those types of classes. Mr. Hinz thanked Ms. Schneider for thinking outside of the box on the proposed use. He said the lot has been vacant for quite a while and commented on the availability of the off-street parking. There were no other public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Hinz. Plan Commission Minutes 13 March 19,2019 Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carried 9-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: OFFICIAL MAPPING FOR 30 FOOT WIDE RIVERWALK ALONG THE NORTH SHORE OF THE FOX RIVER AT 1005 HIGH AVENUE (AXLETECH INTERNATIONAL) Site Inspections: Report: No commissioners reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The City of Oshkosh requests approval to officially map a 30 foot wide corridor for future riverwalk development along the north shore of the Fox River at the Axletech property, 1005 High Avenue. The proposed newly mapped riverwalk corridor would eventually replace the existing 15 foot wide pedestrian easement that currently runs through the property and is developed with a gravel trail. Mr. Burich presented the item, reviewed the site and surrounding area. The Winnebago County Parks Department is currently responsible for upkeep and maintenance of this segment of the WIOUWASH Trail. The trail currently runs along the shore for most of the Axletech property, then heads northeasterly away from the shoreline heading through the middle of the undeveloped portion of the property and outside of the designated easement area. The county has budgeted to move the trail into an existing pedestrian easement owned by the city. Instead of relocating the trail to the existing easement area, the city would prefer to realign the trail to the proposed mapping area which runs it parallel to the river for as long as practical before swinging back along the Spellman marina property and to the existing trail easement. This would require working with the property owner to release the existing easement and obtaining an easement in the newly mapped area. The mapping follows along an existing 20 foot wide city sanitary sewer easement running along the shoreline which is also appears to follow an ATC easement so the mapped area is relatively undevelopable for building development. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed mapping action is consistent with the Plans recommendation as it will provide additional public access to waterfront amenities. The city envisions an eventual connection of this trail to the trail system currently being designed for Lakeshore Park. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. Mr. Hinz asked if the land to the south was already mapped for the riverwalk. Mr. Burich replied there is an existing easement for the riverwalk that runs down to Wisconsin Street. Plan Commission Minutes 14 March 19,2019 Mr. Mott inquired about the rest of the property. Mr. Burich stated the entire parcel is owned by Axletech. He said at one time there was discussion about dividing the land. Mr. Fojtik asked if the rest of the site would need remediation. Mr. Burich replied it is unknown. Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. There were no statements from the applicant There were no public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Mott. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carried 9-0. VIII. APPROVAL OF MENOMINEE SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Site Inspections: Report: Mr. Fojtik reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. Staff requests approval of the Menominee South Neighborhood Plan, which focuses on the neighborhood bounded by Washington Avenue on the south, East Broad Street on the west, Lake Winnebago on the east and Irving Avenue on the north. Recent efforts by residents,the Menominee South Neighborhood Association,City of Oshkosh and partner organizations have centered on enhancing existing assets to provide stability and ensure the Menominee South neighborhood continues to be one of choice in Oshkosh. The purpose of this review is for the Plan Commission to make a determination that the proposed goals and objectives within the Plan Commission Minutes 15 March 19,2019 Menominee South Neighborhood Plan are consistent with the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, and other planning objectives of the City. Ms. Naudziunas presented the item and reviewed the map of the proposed neighborhood and discussed the purpose of the plan and the process of its development and reviewed the priority areas of the plan. This plan was prepared for the Menominee South Neighborhood Association with the intent to support their efforts in addressing neighborhood challenges and promoting reinvestment. Created during a yearlong resident led planning process;the plan may be used by the Menominee South Neighborhood Association, the City of Oshkosh, and partner organizations to ensure neighborhood improvements and activities are implemented to meet the needs of residents. The plan first offers a brief neighborhood history,followed by a snapshot of current conditions, including both assets and concerns identified throughout the planning process. The plan then outlines four priority areas: Image,Market, Physical Conditions and Neighborhood Management. Individual sections explore each focus area, assess current conditions, and provide goals, objectives and specific action items to help achieve the intended goals. Mr. Fojtik opened technical questions to staff. There were no technical questions on this item. Mr. Fojtik asked if there were any public comments. There were no public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments. Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Hinz. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Mr. Fojtik thanked staff for doing these plans because they are worth the time. Ms. Propp agreed. Motion carried 9-0. Mr. Kiefer left at 5:59 pm. IX. ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE (SMU) TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 12 (MR-12) AND APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP DEVELOPMENT FOR MULTI-FAMILY LOCATED AT THE 1400 BLOCK OF OSBORN Plan Commission Minutes 16 March 19,2019 Site Inspections: Report: No commissioners reported visiting the site. Memo accepted as part of the record. Mr. Lyons presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. He explained as a result of the March 5th Plan Commission meeting the applicant has been working to make additional revisions to the proposed site plan. The applicant has request this item be laid over to the April 2nd meeting in order to continue updating the plans. He stated notices were sent out to neighboring properties notifying them of the updated meeting date. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. There was no technical questions on this item. Motion by Propp to lay over the zone change and Conditional Use Permit a group development for multi family located at the 1400 block of Osborn until April 2nd. Seconded by Vajgrt. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Mr. Burich added that discussions are still ongoing with the applicant because of the concerns from neighbors and Plan Commission. Motion carried 9-0. X. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT (SMU) TO SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SMU-PD) AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY LOCATED AT 2080 WITZEL AVENUE Site Inspections: Report: Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU)to Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD) and approval for a General Development Plan for a Senior Living Community. Mr. Lyons presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. The petitioner is proposing a three phase Senior Living Community development. Total development would be approximately 257,000 sq. ft. of building Plan Commission Minutes 17 March 19,2019 and 225 units that includes a mixture of 1-3 story buildings. Phase 1 would consist of 43 independent living units, 38 assisted living units and 28 memory care units. Phase 2 would consist of 33 independent, 24 assisted and 29 memory care. Phase 3 would consist of an additional 30 duplex units. The development is described as an"age in place' senior living community, giving residence multiple living options within a single development. The site is served by a single access point on Witzel Avenue. The Department of Public Works will require the development to be considered a private road for addressing purposes. The applicant has indicated a total of 230 parking spaces will be provided. Finalized storm water management plans will be required as part of the Specific Implementation Plan and Site Plan Review process. A finalized code compliant landscaping plan will be required as part of the Specific Implementation Plan. Signage will need to be addressed as part of the Specific Implementation Plan. Concept building elevations have been included. The building elevations appear to meet the exterior design requirements for multifamily residential development. The buildings are primarily clad in a mixture of stone,brick and wood fiber siding. Final building elevations will need to be submitted and approved as part of the Specific Implementation Plan and Site Plan Review processes. Mr. Burich stated there was a neighborhood meeting and the neighbors were in support of the land use. He said the only concern is with the neighbors to the north which could be mitigated with a better buffer. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. Mr. Fojtik asked if this request would open up an opportunity for flood control mitigation in the area. Mr. Gohde said he was not aware of excessive water in the area. Mr. Fojtik inquired about the wetlands. Mr. Burich stated the wetlands cannot be increased. Mr. Gohde stated the only issue would be having to discharge all the water onto Witzel Avenue. Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Mark Hammond (applicant), 7901 W. National Avenue of West Allis, said he had a presentation. He presented the PowerPoint which explained background information about the business, other facilities, timeline, technology used and so on. He said the location is ideal for what they want to build because it is in-between residential and commercial. He said the location will bring in more visitors for the residents. Ms. Propp asked for Mr. Hammond to show where Phase 1 was located on the aerial image. Mr. Hammond showed her. Mr. Vajgrt explained that he has a brother and sister-in-law just moved to a similar facility in Port Washington. He asked if the facility provided care for all types of people. Plan Commission Minutes 18 March 19,2019 Mr. Hammond responded they do and there is an RCAC standard. They are also licensed for Alzheimer and Dementia. He said they do have a facility in Port Washington. Mr. Perry asked if the licensing would be as a CBRF and RCAC. Mr. Hammond replied it would be. Mr. Perry asked how the licensing would work for the entire development. Mr. Hammond explained the licensing based on how the Phases would be developed. Mr. Perry inquired about a contingency plan if the demand is low. Mr. Hammond explained the initial phase carries the cost for the entire land. He said this would take five to ten years to build out. He said if the demand is low, a reduction to other phases could be possible. There were no other public comments on this item. Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. There were no closing statements from the applicant Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Hinz. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Ms. Propp stated this is a good development and is appropriate for the area. She said she hopes the exterior standards are upheld to the same standards as shown in the PowerPoint. Motion carried 9-0. XI. SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR VEHICLE SALES AT 1911 WEST SNELL ROAD Site Inspections: Report: No commissioners reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. Plan Commission Minutes 19 March 19,2019 The applicant requests approval of a Specific Implementation Plan Amendment for vehicle sales at 1911 W. Snell Road. Mr. Lyons presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. On December 4, 2018 Plan Commission recommended approval of the request with conditions. After additional discussions with the applicant and staff the Common Council referred the request back to Plan Commission at the December 11, 2018 Common Council meeting. Plan Commission discussed several proposed modifications to the original plan at a March 5, 2019 workshop. The proposed development consists of an existing approximately 13,900 sq. ft. auto/truck repair shop and towing service. The applicant is no longer proposing to add the 50' X 50'building addition that was part of the prior request. The applicant is also requesting to add auto/truck sales as a permitted use. The applicant is proposing to expand that area by approximately 39,000 sq. ft.,nearly doubling the existing outdoor storage area. The applicant has provided a revised site plan. One of the primary concerns is related to the subject site has been the lack of organization of storage and the haphazard appearance of its storage areas. The applicant has shown a history seeking approvals for a planned development amendments and then never following through with the conditions of the approval. This is evident by fact the site was not brought into compliance with either the 2006 or 2008 planned development amendments. Due to the concerns, staff is suggesting multiple conditions. Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff. Mr. Perry questioned how far apart the arborvitae would be. He asked if it could be conditioned. He is concerned that a fence or 2'berm may not stop the ongoing encroachment issues. Mr. Lyons said the buffer could be further condition if needed. Mr. Groth inquired about the current interior fencing. Mr. Lyons replied it is a solid 8'metal fence. Mr. Fojtik asked for any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Mr. Rangeloff(applicant), 3020 Oregon Street, said he has spent 15 years in the neighborhood. He stated his business has grown in that time. He said his property's zoning changed to industrial by the city without any discussion. He said he was unsure of what it is currently zoned. Mr. Lyons replied it is zoned Heavy Industrial with a Planned Development Overlay (HI-PD). Mr. Rangeloff said it was not a PD when he bought the site. He said the site used to be a gas station, truck repair shop and storage. He said during the time he has owned the property, the parcel size has decreased. He stated the time limits on parking is not fair especially for an industrial zoned property. He said if it were not for the granting of car sales,he would just keep running his business as he does now. He stated spending$12,000 on architecture designs that Plan Commission Minutes 20 March 19,2019 were never approved which is what he used for a basis on his site plan. He stated he has concerns with some of the conditions listed like landscaping and parking on the west side. He said he has tried stopping the trucks from encroaching. Karl Keas, 505 Fox Fire Drive, stated the encroachment has been ongoing for ten years. He said the landscaping and buffer is very important to Omni. He explained the lots are currently for sale and they have never been able to clean up the property line. He hopes the integrity of the condition is maintained relating to that property line. Mr. Fojtik closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. Mr. Burich suggested talking through some of the conditions. Mr. Rangleoff said he never received a staff report, only a meeting notice. He stated this is the first time he has seen the staff report and conditions. Motion by Vajgrt to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Seconded by Hinz. Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion. Ms. Propp asked if there was currently anything on the west lot line. Mr. Lyons replied there is not but they are recommending different types of buffers. Mr. Burich explained encroachment with a buffer usually helps to maintain the integrity of setback. He also explained what is currently approved for setback and compared it to what is currently being recommended. Ms. Propp said the fence or landscaping options should help mitigate the encroachment issue. Mr. Ford asked for clarification on condition number 21 and if it only related to the enclosed storage area. Mr. Lyons confirmed it was. Mr. Perry asked what the traditional setback is for the zoning. Mr. Burich replied Mr. Rangeloff is currently approved for a 10' setback. He said they are looking for a compromise. He showed the aerial pictures of the site and explained the goal is to get some organization to the site but allow Mr. Rangeloff to run his business. He pointed out that the outdoor storage has been illegally expanded. He said some of the concerns are the prolonged parking and encroachment issues. He said the goal again to work together and compromise. Plan Commission Minutes 21 March 19,2019 Mr. Perry is still concerned if there is not a barrier. He stated that the axle location is different on each truck. Motion carried 9-0. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:53 pm. (Vajgrt/Hinz) Respectfully submitted, Darryn Burich Director of Planning Services Plan Commission Minutes 22 March 19,2019