Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22. 18-346JUNE 26, 2018 18-346 ORDINANCE FIRST READING (CARRIED PURPOSE INITIATED BY LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN ) APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT (NMU) TO NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (NMU- PD); 129 WEST 17TH AVENUE CHET WESENBERG PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30- 32 OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS. The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Section 30-32 of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by changing the district character of the described property at 129 W. 171h Avenue from Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NMU) to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with Planned Development Overlay (NMU-PD). SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. EAST 130 FEET OF WEST 280.25 FEET OF LOT 5 AND LOT 6, EAST 290 FEET OF LOT 4 AND EAST 320.25 FEET OF LOT 3 CLEMENT AND DOTYS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 PLUS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS EXTENDING TO THE CENTERLINE OF WEST 17TH AVENUE ALL IN THE 14TH WARD, CITY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN. JUNE 26, 2018 18-346 ORDINANCE FIRST READING CONT'D SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh enacted Ordinance #18-xxx APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT (NMU) TO NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (NMU-PD); 129 WEST 17TH AVENUE on July 10, 2018. This ordinance changes the zoning at 129 W. 171h Avenue from Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NMU) to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with Planned Development Overlay (NMU-PD). The full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the Office of the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave. and on the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us. Clerk's phone: (920) 236-5011. �K 20 s SUBJECT SITE Y 156 e � s 17 0 1 Ems; '136 1 NITi 5 137 107 }, N 1 in = 0.03 mi z§: 1 in = 150 ft r City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the Printing Date: 3127/2018 information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Oshkosh www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisdaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI . 1:1GISV Ianning\Plan Commission Site Han Map TemplateRan Commission Site Plan Mao Temolate.mxd TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Darryn Burich Director of Planning Services DATE: I June 20, 2018 RE: Approve Zone Change from Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NMU) to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with Planned Development Overlay (NMU- PD); 129 West 17th Avenue (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) BACKGROUND The subject area consists of one parcel, approximately 1.645 acres (71,656 square feet) in size, located on the south side of W. 17th Street and east of Oregon Street. The subject area currently contains a vacant commercial building that formerly housed the VFW, bar and banquet hall with associated surface parking. In 2014, the attached rear wood frame addition housing the banquet hall was destroyed by fire and subsequently demolished. This item was laid over by the Plan Commission at its May 1st due to concerns regarding the architectural design of the main structure and use for the remaining undeveloped greenspace portion of the property. A workshop was conducted on May 15th where design changes were proposed. Historically, for at least the past 53 years going back to the 1965 zoning map, the subject property has been zoned for general and/or neighborhood commercial usage. Prior to the recent comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, the subject property was zoned C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and would have permitted 47 multiple family units by right with no Council approval required. After the comprehensive zoning update the parcel was changed to Neighborhood Mixed Use which only conditionally permits multiple family units with a maximum of 4 units per building and 1,200 square foot per dwelling unit which results in a maximum density of 59 units. ANALYSIS The proposed development consists of an adaptive reuse and addition to the existing 2 story building to create an 8 unit apartment building with an 8 unit detached garage structure. As a second phase of development, the applicant is also proposing to construct 4, approximately 3,000 sq. ft., duplexes in the southern greenspace area of the parcel. City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1 130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us The current Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NMU) zoning district permits multi -family buildings up to a maximum of 4 units. In order to accommodate the increase in unit size, the applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with Planned Development Overlay (NMU-PD) and seek a Base Standard Modification (BSM) to increase the maximum allowed 4 unit building to an 8 unit building. With 16 overall dwelling units proposed, this results in a dwelling unit density of 1 dwelling unit per 4,478 square feet. For comparison, the adjacent residential district is zoned SR -9 which requires a minimum density of 1 dwelling unit per 4,500 square feet so effectively on a per square foot basis the proposed living unit density for the subject property and neighborhood are similar. The major difference is the density number of living units in a building which with the proposed 8 unit building and 4 duplexes is higher than the surrounding residential neighborhood that is predominately single family. Staff supports the request for a zone change and Base Standard Modification for an 8 unit building as the overall scale and massing of the building will be similar to what was historically on the site. Additionally, the subject property is an unusually large odd shaped parcel which makes it more difficult to redevelop efficiently for one single family or two flat use and without tearing down the existing structure. FISCAL IMPACT The current assessed value of the improvements on the subject site is approximately $50,000. The adaptive reuse of that structure for 8 units is expected to add another $400,000-$500,000 in assessed value and the duplex units add another $700,000-$1,000,000 in improvement value. RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission recommended approval of a zone change at its June 19, 2018 meeting. Respec lly Submitted, Darryn Burich Director of Planning Services Approved: Mark A. Rohloff City Manager City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us *REVISED ON JUNE 21, 2018. ITEM: ZONE CHANGE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT (NMU) TO NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (NMU-PD) AND APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FOUR DUPLEXES AND AN 8 UNIT MULTI FAMILY STRUCTURE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 129 W. 77TH STREET Plan Commission meeting of June 19, 2018. *This item was laid over from the May 1, 2018 meeting. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Chet Wesenberg Property Owner: General Contracting Services LLC Action(s) Requested: The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NNW) to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (NMU-PD). The applicant also requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit and General Development Plan to allow for construction of four duplexes and an 8 unit apartment building and 8 unit garage. Applicable Ordinance Provisions: The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning from one classification to another but relies on the Comprehensive Plan and good planning principles. Conditional Use Permit standards are found in Section 30-382 of the Zoning Ordinance. Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance. Property Location and Type: The subject area consists of one parcel approximately 1.645 acres in size, located on the south side of W 171h Street and east of Oregon Street. The subject area currently contains a vacant commercial building and associated surface parking. *The site previously contained a commercial bar with an attached banquet hall. In 2014, the attached banquet hall portion of the structure was destroyed by fire and subsequently demolished. The surrounding area consists of a mixture of single and two family residential uses to the north, south and east as well as a mixed use commercial building to the west. The 10 and 20 Year Comprehensive Land Use Plans both recommend this area as a commercial node for the subject area. SUBJECT SITE ' _ t B t. 19 7T A;1 -H 8 19 7T A;1 -H 1701 5P 113 , 103 103A 55 Xp 49 _ c � !t.e 1954 �(`-1r�- - _ Ma } � 2SfT RP 1112 noP fill 170 1 136 -UTH I P �9 6!.. _ 5 137 = �s 56 5 107 E _ T: MIR K N 1 in = 0,03 mi. 1 in =150 ft OA% City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for information are responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information. Those using the accuracy. For full disclaimer please go toCr`ZC Printing Date: 3127/2018 °fc vrrrx.ci.oshkosh.wi.uslGlSdisclaimer Prepared by; City of Oshkosh, WI J C J,3 JAGIS1Pfannin,gOan CommissionS•ke Plan MaoTemolateSan Commission Site Plan MaeTemolate.mxd User. minak 19 Subject Site Existing Land Use Zonin Commercial /Vacant NMU Adyacent Land Use and G Existinf Uses Zoning North Single & Two Family^ Residential SR -9 South WW Single & Two Family Residential .......... SR -9 East Single & Two Family Residential SR -9 West Mixed Use NMU Comprehensive Pian Land Use Recommendation Land Use 10 Year & 20 Year Land Use Recommendation Commercial ANALYSIS Plan Commission laid over the initial request on 5/1/18 due to concerns regarding the architectural design of the structure and use for the remaining portion of the property. The applicant then conducted a neighborhood meeting on 5/21/18 to discuss the proposed project. Use The proposed development consists of an alteration and addition to the existing 2 story building to an 8 unit apartment building. The developer also proposes to construct a new 8 unit garage structure. The current NMU zoning district permits multi -family buildings up to a maximum of 4 units. In order to accommodate the increase in unit size, the applicant is proposing to rezone the property to NMU-PD and seek a Base Standard Modification (BSM) to increase the maximum allowed 4 unit building to an 8 unit building. Staff supports the request for a zone change and the BSM for an 8 unit building. It is staff's opinion the size of the parcel (1.654 acres) exceeds what is traditionally found in NMU zoning. The applicant is also proposing to construct 4, approximately 3,000 sq. ft., duplexes. Duplexes require a Conditional Use Permit in the NMU district. The 8 unit building plus 4 duplexes lead to a relatively low density of only 9.72 units per acre. The proposed density is just slightly higher than what would be allowed in the adjacent Single Family Residential — 9 District (SR -9). The SR -9 district allows a maximum density of 9.62 units per acre. Site Design/Access The proposed development will have one 24' driveway entrance on W. 17th Avenue. The applicant is proposing to close an existing eastern curb cut and restore the curb. The development includes 8 surface parking spaces and 8 garage parking spaces for the multifamily development. The duplexes would each have a 2 car garage and an additional 8 visitor spaces are being provided. The applicant meets code requirements for off-street parking. ITEM: Rezone,CUAGDP 129 W 17n Avenue Storm Water ManagementlUtilities Minimal storm water management plans have been provided and are being reviewed by the Department of Public Works. The applicant has been advised to have further discussions with the Department of Public Works regarding storm water management for the area. Finalized storm water management plans will need to be submitted and approved as part of the Specific Implementation Plan and Site Plan Review processes. Landscaping A conceptual landscaping plan has been submitted with the application and includes a variety of proposed shrubs and trees. The conceptual plan includes a mixture of building foundation, paved area, street frontage and bufferyard landscaping. A finalized landscaping plan including species, quantities and location of plant materials will need to meet Zoning Code requirements and will be analyzed during the Specific Implementation Plan review process. Signage The applicant has an example sign drawing for the development. It indicates a 3'11" tall by 10' long monument sign. The NMU district allows 25 sq. ft. of sign copy area. The signage can be addressed under a separate building permit and final sign plan will need to be in compliance with the NMU standards. Site Lighting No photometric plans have been provided by the applicant. Final approval of the lighting plan will occur during the Specific Implementation Plan and Site Plan Review processes. Building Facades The applicant has provided conceptual building elevations for both the multifamily building and duplexes. Section 30-242 (A) requires multi -family uses to be clad in 100% Class 1, Class II or Class III materials and the primary entrance shall be on the front facade facing the street. The conceptual building elevations appear to be in compliance with the zoning code requirements, but final approval will occur during the Specific Implementation Plan process. Refuse Enclosure The concept plan includes a proposed a dumpster enclosure along the main access drive. The proposed enclosure would service both the multifamily and duplexes. BINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Conditional Use Permit, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-382 (F)(3): (1) Is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Would not result in a substantial or undue adverse impact on nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, environmental factors, traffic factors, parking, public ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP I29W..I7'kAvenue improvements, public property or rights-of-way, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, or general welfare. (3) Maintains the desired consistency of land uses, land use intensities, and land use impacts as related to the environs of the subject property. (4) The conditional use is located in an area that will be adequately served by, and will not impose an undue burden on, any of the improvements, facilities, utilities or services provided by public or private agencies serving the subject property. (5) The potential public benefits outweigh any potential adverse impacts of the proposed conditional use, after taking into consideration the applicant's proposal and any requirements recommended by the applicant to ameliorate such impacts. In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6): (a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose and intent of this Chapter. (b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to determine such consistency.) (c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts in the environs of the subject site. (d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to public sewer and water and public roads. (e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and adequate buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development densities/intensities. (f) The proposed Planned Development project design does not detract from areas of natural beauty surrounding the site. (g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development. (h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the area. (i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this Chapter. (j) For Planned Development projects that are proposed to be developed in phases, the applicant can provide a timeline for development and can demonstrate that the project would be successful even if all phases were not or could not be completed. ITEM: Rezone,CUP,GDP 129 W. 111 Avenue 4 Staff recommends approval of the zone change request and approval of the Conditional Use Permit and General Development Plan with the findings listed above and the proposed following condition: 1. Base Standard Modification to allow an 8 unit apartment building. The PIan Commission approved of the zone change request, Conditional Use Permit and General Development Plan as requested with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item. Minutes of 05-01-18 Mr. Lyons presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area. The subject area consists of one parcel approximately 1.645 acres in size, located on the south side of W 17th Street and east of Oregon Street. The subject area currently contains a vacant commercial building and associated surface parking. The proposed development will have one 24' driveway entrance. The development includes 8 surface parking spaces and 8 garage parking spaces. The applicant meets code requirements for off-street parking. The southern, approximately 1 acre, area will remain undeveloped and remain green space with landscaping. Minimal storm water management plans have been provided and finalized plans will need to be submitted and approved as part of the Site Plan Review processes. Per the applicant's site plan, the total amount of required foundation landscaping points are met. The plan also meets the bufferyard landscaping point requirements. The plan provided is deficient in street frontage landscaping and an additional points will need to be added prior to the Site Plan Review process. Final approval of the lighting plan and sign plan will occur during the Site Plan Review processes. The applicant is proposing a dumpster enclosure along the east property line but does not meet the code setback requirements for accessory structures. Revised plans will need to. be submitted as part of the Site Plan Review process. The enclosure meets the exterior material design requirements for a multi -family building. The buildings are clad in a mixture of brick on the existing building and vinyl siding on the addition and garage. The described building materials are in compliance with the zoning codes requirements. Ms. Propp commented that it was a very large parcel and was wondering what the intentions of the remaining space on the south would be. Mr. Lyons responded that there are currently no immediate plans and it will be left as green space for now. Ms. Propp asked what the regulations would be if the green space were to be developed in the future. Mr. Lyons replied that the regulations and restrictions would be dependent on what the future development would be. He also added that any future development would have to come through Plan Commission and follow the standard protocols. ITEM: Rezone,CUAGDP 129 W. 17' Avenue Mr. Bowen questioned if the Plan Commission could vote on the zone change, general development plan and specific implementation plan separately or if it had to be done all together. Mr. Burich stated that the general development plan and specific implementation plan are very similar but it would be acceptable to vote on it both ways as long as it is what the Plan Commission wanted. Mr. Lyons suggested that another option could be to approve the zone change first then work with the applicant on the general development plan and specific implementation plan. . - Mr. Hinz mentioned that the parcel size is not uncommon for the area. He said Hughes Home Maid Chocolate Shop is about a block away from the site and has a similar parcel size. He alsc asked if fencing would be required on the east and west side of the property. Mr. Lyons responded that it is adjacent to NMU zoning and would not have any fencing requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet the bufferyard requirements by the use of landscaping and spacing. Mr. Mott asked if grass would be the landscaping proposed. Mr. Lyons stated there is some landscaping around the perimeter on the south of the property but not much else where. The code does not give specifications on the exact placement of where landscaping is required. He added that the applicant meets the minimum requirements for landscaping but the Plan Commission could always request for more landscaping if desired. Joel Novotny, 1731 Doty Street, said he is in attendance for personal reasons. He loves his current backyard view and would like to keep it the way it is. He is concerned because the owner does not know what the future plans may be for the green space. He is also concerned about the owner purchasing other lots in the area and creating a bigger parcel. Mr. Novotny suggested that maybe the City and the owner could come together for other developments instead of the owner developing the proposed parcel. He knows that the City needs more green space and feels the 1.6 acre parcel could be used as a park. He suggest that the owner could have the rights to name the park. Mr. Novotny said if he could name the park, he would name it Veteran's Park. He stated that he is not requesting Plan Commission to approve or deny the applicant but to table it and look into other options. Bob Mackey, 122 W. 171h Avenue, said that he has lived there for 14 years. He said that most of the neighborhood is zoned as family or a 2 flat and it is a very quiet neighborhood. He said the proposed area could potentially have up to 45 people living in the unit. He does not feel zoning should be approved for the parcel because it would not be allowed if it was a residential property proposing a similar zoning request. He stated that Witzke's Bar is located in the area as well. He said it is not bad living by the bar but when there are weddings, there are up to 120 extra people in the area. The weddings turn the street into a one lane street because of the extra vehicles. He is concerned that the owner may want to develop more units in the future. He feels as though the ITEM: RezoneXUP.GDP I29W..120Avenue development is a bad idea and the wrong location. He commented that he liked Mr. Novotny's park idea but felt it likely would not happen. Mr. Vajgrt asked how many units were in the location previously. Mr. Lyons said that the Assessor's records show roughly 4-5 units but noted that the retards did not specify exact details. Mr. Cummings asked if staff had talked to the school district because of the potential increase in children in the neighborhood. If staff had not communicated with the school district, he feels they should. Mr. Lyons stated that they had not talked to the school district because it was only a proposed 8 unit. He said they would if there were more units being developed. Mr. Burich added that the school district is sent the agenda for all Plan Commission meetings. Ms. Propp and Mr. Bowen asked what the maximum number of units for the site could be if it was built to its maximum. Mr. Lyons responded that the maximum capacity for the site would be 58 units through a conditional use permit.' Ms. Propp is concerned about what the future plans may be for the site. She likes what is being proposed but would like more landscaping. Mr. Lyons stated that any future development would have to come through Plan Commission and follow the standard protocols. Mr. Bowen commented that the aesthetics of the proposed building is not compatible to the area and does not blend in. He added that he would prefer to vote separately on the items or table the items. Mr, Mott asked what the original structure looked like. Mr. Lyons said that it was a wood framed, vinyl sided structure. Mr. Hinz stated that he agrees with tabling the item for now until they get more feedback and information from the developer. Mr. Fojtik and Mr. Vajgrt agreed. Mr. Hinz asked how long the item should be tabled for. ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP 129 W. 17" Avenue Mr. Burich recommended that Plan Commission table it for two meetings and hold a workshop on it at the next Plan Commission meeting. Motion by Bowen to lay over the zone change, general development pian and a specific implementation plan for an 8 unit apartment building and 8 unit garage at 129 W 1711' Street until June 51h. Seconded by Vajgrt. Motion carried 7-1. (nay: Perry) Minutes of 06-19-18 Mr. Lyons presented the item and stated that it was laid over from May due to concerns regarding the architectural design of the structure and use for the remaining portion of the property. He presented and reviewed the site and surrounding area. The site previously contained a commercial bar with an attached banquet hall. In 2014, the attached banquet hall portion of the structure was destroyed by fire and subsequently demolished. The proposed development consists of an alteration and addition to the existing 2 story building to an 8 unit apartment building, a new 8 unit garage structure and 4 duplexes. The current Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NMU) zoning district permits multi -family buildings up to a maximum of 4 units. In order to accommodate the increase in unit size, the applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Neighborhood Mixed Use District with Planned Development Overlay (NMU-PD) and seek a Base Standard Modification (BSM) to increase the maximum allowed 4 unit building to an 8 unit building. Staff supports the request for a zone change and the BSM for an 8 unit building. The 8 unit building plus 4 duplexes lead to a relatively low density. The development includes 8 surface parking spaces and 8 garage parking spaces for the multifamily development. The duplexes would each have a 2 car garage and an additional 8 visitor spaces are being provided. The applicant meets code requirements for off-street parking. Finalized storm water management plans, landscaping plans, photometric plans and building elevations will need to be submitted and approved as part of the Specific Implementation Plan and Site Plan Review processes. The concept plan includes a proposed a dumpster enclosure which would service both the multifamily and duplexes. Mr. Bowen asked if the additional 8 visitor spaces for the duplexes were a requirement under code or if they were for convenience purposes. Mr. Lyons stated that it is for convenience but also part of finalizing the duplexes. Duplexes generally would require two spaces per unit. The additional spaces would be for overflow if needed. Mr. Bowen said what is common for a single family arrangement is a 2 stall garage and 2 stalls in the driveway. Mr. Lyons said that the access drive eliminates the traditional stacked driveway stalls. This is part of the reason for the additional visitor spaces. ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP 129 W..IT''Avenue Mr. Borsuk asked if having only one access drive for the duplexes posed any concerns, who would approve the Specific Implementation Plan and if transitional yard landscaping was required. Mr. Lyons responded that the Specific Implementation Plan would have to be approved by Plan Commission and Common Council. He said that the proposed plan is showing transitional yard landscaping but there is a transitional bufferyard requirement. The final landscaping plans will have to meet the bufferyard requirements. Mr. Burich stated that the police and fire have been notified of the proposed plan during the internal review process and nobody has indicated any concerns. Mr. Lyons added that police and fire did not weigh in on any concerns with the access drive. Mr. Hinz asked if fencing would be required just north of the southwest area of the property, where the two residential properties are abutting the access drive. Mr. Lyons said it would have to meet bufferyard requirements if it is a separate zoning district. He explained bufferyard requirements can be met by distance plus landscaping or fencing plus landscaping. He noted that additional landscaping or fencing could be added as a requirement during the Specific Implementation Plan. Bob Mackey, 122 W. 17Lh Avenue, asked for clarification of what the Specific Implementation process was. Mr. Lyons explained that the Planned Development process is broken up into two parts. The applicant is currently applying for a General Development Plan which is concept plan. The Specific Implementation Plan is when the final detailed plans are submitted. Mr. Mackey wanted confirmation that the item would go back to Plan Commission if the applicant would want to deviate from the proposed plan after being approved and that there was no timeline set for the proposed plan. Mr. Lyons and Mr. Burich both confirmed. Mr. Mackey pointed out the Property Location and Type section in the staff report and said it was not accurate. He stated that the building was never a multi -family dwelling. He explained that it was previously a bar with an attached banquet hall with a kitchen. It later became a bar with a lounge area upstairs and the banquet hall became an indoor smoking area, which is why it burnt down. He said if it were ever a multi -family dwelling, it would have been a long time ago. Mr. Lyons said that the information was pulled from the Assessor's records. He said he would follow-up and update the records correctly. Mr. Hinz asked if the previous residential dwelling was located in the upstairs of the building. ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP 129 W. 17" Avenue Mr. Burich stated he believes that is where it was located, Mr. Mackey explained that he has a few objections to the S unit apartment. The objections are that it is a 66 year old building and does not match the neighborhood, it is not structurally appealing and there will be increased traffic on the weekends. He said there is already traffic issues on the weekends. Currently, W. 17f Avenue between Doty Street and Oregon Street becomes a one lane road on the weekends due to traffic. Richard Paulik, 119 W. 1711, Avenue, said he lives next to the lot. He is worried about privacy and noise issues. He currently has a chain link fence in the backyard and a small fence along the driveway but it is not in the best shape. The bedrooms and the nursery are located on the west side of the house. He hopes that as the development is constructed, that they would consider building a taller fence and give his family more privacy. Michael Kroll, 1732 Doty Street, stated that he opposes the S unit apartment building because it is not standard to the neighborhood. Steve Pierce, 1725 Doty Street, read a letter on behalf of his dad, Edward Pierce. Mr. Edward Pierce stated in the letter that the members on the PIan Commission would not want an apartment building in their backyard neighborhood and that the neighborhood is a peaceful one with a low crime rate. Mr. Steve Pierce said his dad has lived in the house for 70 years. The house was Mr. Steve Pierce's great grandparents, grandparents, his parents and one day his. He was hoping to retire in the house. He does not want low income apartments in the backyard. He questioned if there were other locations in Oshkosh that would be suitable for the proposed plan. Katie PoeschI, 112 W. 1711, Avenue, objects to the proposed plan. Ms. Poeschl stated that what is being proposed for zoning is 4 times the size of what would be allowed. She feels that it is not fair and this is not what is best for the neighborhood. Laura Kroll, 1732 Doty Street, stated that she grew up at 1721 Doty Street. She has been in the neighborhood for 35 years. She opposes the proposed plans. Ms. Kroll questions why a conditional use permit is needed and what the hardship is for it. Mr. Borsuk asked if they applicant is present and could answer questions if needed. Mr. Lyons confirmed that the applicant is present. Mr. Fojtik wanted to clarify that this is not low income housing. Mr. Lyons and Mr. Burich confirmed that it is not. Mr. Bowen feels that the applicant has made an attempt to make the plan more aesthetically appealing since the first meeting. Mr. Bowen brought up the Base Standard Modification to increase the density and said the parcel size is uncommon at almost 2 acres. He said one of city's ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP 129 W I7'k Avenue 10 goals is to increase urban infill type developments and how the city can provide quality, new housing options to people of all income levels in all of our existing neighborhoods. Mr. Bowen notes that he does not want to dismiss the neighbors' concerns but this proposal would dovetail with the city's goals pertaining to infill type developments. He feels as the proposed plan's density is more sensitive to the: neighborhood. Mr. Vajgrt wanted a confirmation that it.was not low income housing again. Mr. Fojtik confirmed it was not low income housing. Mr. Ford asked what allowable unit size is with the current zoning. Mr. Lyons stated that through the conditional use process and the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning, the area is allowed up to a 4 unit apartment building via conditional use. The applicant wants to take the conditional use from 4 units to 8 units which is triggering the Planned Development with a Base Standard Modification. Mr. Ford asked how staff concluded with the low detrimental impact in the neighborhood. Mr. Lyons stated that they based it off the parcel size and the density. The density calculates to 9 units per acre which is similar to single family. Mr. Burich said that the applicant could go up to a .maximum of 59 units but that would likely not happen because it would not be able to meet storm water and setback requirements. Mr. Lyons added that the applicant is proposing considerably less than what the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning maximum allows. Mr. Burich said that the if the zoning is not approved, the current Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning would allow the applicant to request even more units under a conditional use than what is currently being proposed. Mr. Borsuk asked what other uses are allowable for Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning. Mr. Lyons listed some of the allowable uses with and without a conditional use such as professional personal services, commercial retail, apartments with limited commercials, vehicle sales, light industrial, restaurants, bars and much more. Mr. Burich noted that Neighborhood Mixed Use used to be the C1 District zoning which was Neighborhood Commercial District. Mr. Borsuk stated that the proposed plan is a less detrimental option for the neighborhood compared to the possible uses allowed. He stated that he agrees with Mr. Bowen with encouraging more infill developments in the city. He also wanted to compliment the developers on meeting the needs of the community and minimizing the impact within the neighborhood. ITEM : Rezone,CUR GDP 129 W. 17h Avenue II Mr. Hinz brought up the traffic concerns. He said at the maximum there would be a total of 32 vehicles that could be leaving at once. He stated that it would be rare to have that happen at the same time. He feels that the traffic increase would not be as detrimental as business traffic. Mr. Hinz understands that the traffic on W. 171h Avenue is busy but that an issue for the traffic review board and not Plan Commission. Motion by Bowen to approve the zone change, general development plan and a conditional use permit to allow for construction of four duplexes, an 8 unit apartment building and an 8 unit garage at 129 W. 17th Street with the following conditions: 2. Base Standard Modification to allow an 8 unit apartment building. Seconded by Vajgrt. Motion carried 8-1 (Nay: Perry). ITEM: Rezone, CUP. GDP 129 W. 17" Avenue 12 C11Q1 Oshkosh SUBMIFTO: City of Oshkosh Dept. of Community Development DevelopmentPlanned Application 215 Church Ave.,1 Box 113D Oshkosh, W1 54701 PHONE: (920) 235-5o54 For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK - APPLICANT INFORMATION Petitioner: CHET WESENBERG Date: 3117118 Petitioner's Address: 240 ALGOMA BLVD. SUITE A City: OSHKOSH State: V1/1 Zip;54901 Telephone #: (920) 230-4900 Fax: ( ) Other Contact # or Emaik chet.wesenberg@cwarchitect.net Status of Petitioner (Please Check): �ITOwner 1 Representative D Tenant D Prospective Buyer Petitioner's Signature (required): --��,� Date; OWNER INFORMATION Owner(s): GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC Owner(s) Address: 4820 COUNTY CLUB ROAD Date: 3/17/18 City: OSHKOSH State: WI Zip: 54902 Telephone #: (920) 579-0532 Fax: ( ) Other Contact # or Email: mrvienola@yahoo.com Ownership Status (Please Check): 0 Individual h Trust E) Partnership ❑ Corporation 006-C Property Owner Consent: (required) By signature hereon,. I/We acknowledge -that City officials�lnd/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gaoler other info�matg�t ecessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and maybe postponed5y"the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: Date: TYPE OF REQUEST: IN General Development Pian (GDP) 0 General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment W Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) 0 Specific Implementation Pian (SIP) Amendment SITE INFORMATION Address/Location of Proposed Project: 129 W. 17TH STREET Proposed Project Type (8) UNIT DWELLING UNIT Current Use of Property; VACANT- FORMERLY TAVERN Zoning: N -MU/ W -PD Land Uses Surrounding YourSite: North: NMU/ TR -10 South: East: West: SR -9 SR -9 > It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. A Application fees are due of time of submittal, Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. Y Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE For more information please visit the City's website at www,ci.oshkosh,wl,us/Community_Development/Planning,htm Staff Date. Rec'd 5 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - Must accompany the application to be complete. The following information must be provided in order for the application to be considered complete and able to be scheduled for Plan Commission Review. Please use the checklist below to determine the required information to be submitted at the time of application. If all information below cannot be provided at the time of application, please request a waiver in writing to the Division's Director or designee. ❑ A General Development Plan (GDP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(4), shall include the following items (digital files should be submitted): ❑ At ull size (24" X 36") hard copy plan set including the required plans listed below and a digital plan set. ❑ General location map of the subject site depicting: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject property, • Current zoning of the subject site and abutting properties, and the jurisdictions) that maintains that control. • A graphic scale and north arrow. ❑ Generalized site plan showing the pattern or proposed land uses, including: • General size, shape, and arrangement of lots and specific use areas. • Basic street pattern and pattern of internal drives. • General site grading plan showing preliminary road grades. • Basic storm drainage pattern, including proposed on-site stormwater detention. • General location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space. ❑ Statistical data, including: • Minimum lot sizes in the development. • Approximate areas of all lots. • Density/intensity of various parts of the development. • Building coverage. • Landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses. • Expected staging. ❑ Conceptual landscaping plan. ❑ General signage plan. ❑ General outline of property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions. ❑ A written description of the proposed Planned Development, including: • General project themes and images. • The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. • Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities. • General treatment of natural features. • General relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other area plans. • Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. ❑ Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee. ❑ A Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(5), shall include the following items. Note that the area included in an SIP may be only a portion of the area included in a previously approved GDP (digital files should be submitted): ❑ A full size (24" X 36") hard copy plan set including the required plans listed below and a digital plan set. ❑ An existing conditions map of the subject site depicting the following: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject site. • Current zoning of the subject property and all abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control. • Existing utilities and recorded easements. • All lot dimensions of the subject site. • A graphic scale and a north arrow. 11 An SIP map of the proposed site showing at least the following: • Lot layout and the arrangements of buildings. Public and private roads, driveways, walkways, and parking facilities. Specific treatment and location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space, ❑ Proposed grading plan. ❑ Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location, species, and installation size of plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species, ❑ Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi -family structures, or building clusters, other than conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings. ❑ Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems, stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and walkways. ❑ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs, and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common practices. ❑ Specific written description of the proposed SIP including: Specific project themes and images. Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre, and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity. • Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland. Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by Plan Commission. A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shall list the standard zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion, would inhibit the development project and the opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project. • A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s) in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur. • Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended. C3Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common open areas and amenities. ❑ A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are included with this application. I am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result in denial or delay of the application request. f , Applicant's Signature (required): _ Date: ✓� lr City of Oshkosh Application SUBMITTo City. Dept. of Community Development �f Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) 215.Church Ave P.O_ Dox.i 130 Oshkosh osnt ch,Wisconsin$4903-1130 **PLEASE TYPE UR PRINT USING BLACK INK"PHONE: (920) 234-3059 APPLIGANt INFORMATION Petitioner: CHET WESENBERG Date: 3/19/18 Petition&sA;ddress; 240 ALGOMA BLVD. SUITE A City; OSHKOSH State: WI Zip:. 54901 Telephone #: (920) 230-4900 Fax: ( ( - Other Contact # or Emails chet.wesenberg@cwarchitect.net Tiafus of P.efPloner (Please Check): ❑ Ow "r resenfialive o Tenant o Prospecilve Buyer / Petitidrier'sSighdture (required):. Date '-/ I" OWNER INFORMATION owner(s):. GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC Date: 3/19/18 - Owners) Address: 4820 COUNTY CLUB ROAD City; .OSHKOSH —State. -WI Zip: 54902 Telephone #; (920) 579-0532 Fax: ( ) Other Contact # or Ema(I: mrvienola ahoo.com Ownership Stalus .(Please Check): o Individual D Trust ❑ Partnership pCorpordtion Propeity Owner Consenf. (required) By:signaiure hereon 11We 0ckn6wI6d'da4hdt C:ty officio"d/or employees may, In the performance of ihe:rfunctions, eriter upon the. properly to inspect or gather oiher� orrndfl n nece , ry-t processthis application: I also understand that all meeting dafies are tent6tive and relay be postponed by "the P nning Se -ces D`- sIo or incomplete submissions or other administrative re��sons Property Owner's Signature: Date: ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Address/Loczailon of Rezoning Requesf 129 W. 17TH AVENUE Tax Parcel Number(s): 91400130000 Rezone.property from: _N MV to /ym U - P i> Purpose torRezoning: DEVELOPMENT PROPOSES ADDITION/,R EN OVATION OF F EXISTING BUILDING TO AN (8) UNIT DWELLING UNIT. PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT ONLY ALLOWS UP TO A (4) UNIT VIA CONDITIONAL USE Describe existing property development and land use: IT IS 1.65 ACRES AND HAS AN EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE WHICH IS NOW VACANT AND FORMERLY OPERATED AS A TAVERN Descdbe proposed.development and/or proposed land use: CONSISTS OFA TWO-STORY (2) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AND AN (8) UNIT DETACHED GARAGE STRUCTURE Proposed time. schedule.fordeve(opment-and/oruseof.the.property: IT IS ANTICIPATED TO COMMENCE IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR. COMPLETION IS EXPECTED IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR Zoning Adjacent to the Site: Nortf,;..NMU/TR-10 South:. SR -9 East: SR -9 West:. SR -9 .Staff Date Rec'd SUBMIT TO: ^AAW City Of Oshkosh Application Dept. of Community Development City 215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130 of Conditional Use Permit Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903-1130 Oshkosh PHONE: (920) 236-5059 —PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK" APPLICANT INFORMATION Petitioner: CHET WESENBERG ARCHITECT LLC Date: 06/01/2018 Petitioner's Address: 240 ALGOMA BOULEVARD, SUITE A City: OSHKOSH State: WI Zip: 54901-4775 Telephone #: ( 920) 230.4900 Fax: ( } N/A Other Contact # or Email: CHET.WESENBERQ(u). CWARCHITECTURE. NE Status of Petitioner (Please Check): - 1 9wner XRepresentative -- Tenant J Prospective Buyer Petitioner's Signature (required): Date: 06/01/2018 OWNER INFORMATION Owner(s): GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC Date: 06/01/2018 Owner(s) Address: 4820 COUNTY CLUB ROAD City: OSHKOSH State: WI Zip: 54902 Telephone #: ( 920) 579.0532 —Fax:( ) Other Contact # or Email: MRVIENOLAa. YAHOO.COM Ownership Status (Please Check): D Individual Trust Partnership, i1 Corporation Property Owner Consent: (required) By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gather other Infor on necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative d m y be, p pone by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: SITE INFORMATION Address/Location of Proposed Project: 129 17th AVENUE Proposed Project Type: RESIDENTIAL Date: 06/01/2018 Current Use of Property: VACANT FORMER TAVERN Zoning: NMU Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: NMU / TR -10 South: East: West: S "Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request. ➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. ➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. ➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE For more information please the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.him Staff Date Rec'd _ 9 Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use will not have a negative effect on the issues below. 1. Health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVOLOPMENT IS ANTICIPATED TO PROVIDE INCREASED HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE THAN THE PROPERTY'S FORMER FUNCTION AS A TAVERN. 2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS ANTICIPATED TO BE DECREASED FROM THE PROPERTY'S FORMER USE WHICH INCLUDED A TAVERN. 3. Noise, air, water, or other forms of environmental pollution. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DUPLEXES ARE ANTICIPATED TO PROVIDE BETTER NOISE, AIR, AND WATER QUALITY THAN THE PROPERTIES FORMER FUCNTION AS A TAVERN. 4. The demand for and availability of public services and facilities. NEW LARGER WATER SUPPLY LATERAL WILL BE REQUIRED. EXISTING ADJACENT CITY UTILITIES ARE ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 5. Character and future development of the area. CURRENT ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD CONSISTS LARGELY OF RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DUPLEXES WILL BE MORE COMPATABLE WITH SURROUNDINGS THAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - Must accompany the application to be complete. ➢ A narrative of the proposed conditional use and project including: ❑ Proposed use of the property ❑ Existing use of the property ❑ Identification of structures on the property and discussion of their relation to the project ❑ Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers ❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the nearest one-hundredth of an acre ❑ Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fumes, vibration, etc. ❑ Surrounding land uses ❑ Compatibility of the proposed use wifh adjacent and other properties in the area. ❑ Traffic generation ❑ Any other information pertinent to adequate understanding of the intended use and its relation to nearby properties ➢ A complete site plan including: ❑ Two (2) full size (24" x 36") scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations ❑ Two (2) 8 IA" x 11 (minimum) to 1 1 " x 17" (maximum) reduction'of the building elevations and site plan ❑ One compact disc or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the project in AutoCAD 2000 format with fonts and plot style table file (if plans have been prepared digitally) ❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner, if different ❑ Full name and contact information of petitioner's engineers/surveyors/architects, or other design professionals used in the plan preparation ❑ The date of the original plan and latest date of revision to the plan ❑ A north arrow and graphic scale. Said scale is not to be smaller than one inch equals sixty feet (1 "=60') unless otherwise approved by the Department of Community Development prior to submittal ❑ All property lines and existing and proposed right-of-way lines with bearings and dimensions clearly labeled ❑ All required building setback and offset lines ❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives, decks, patios, fences, walls ❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for construction ❑ Location and dimension of all on-site parking (and off-site parking provisions if they are to be employed), including a summary of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30-175 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance ❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas on the subject property ❑ Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a photometrics plan ❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e. visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to; HVAC equipment, electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators 10 CHET ARCHITECT, LLC 129 1 7th Avenue Conditional Use Permit Application Written Narrative of the Proposed Conditional Use and Project Including: Proposed use of Property: Proposed Development consists of Phases 1 and 2. Phase 1 consists of an alteration and addition to an existing 2 story building. The building is proposed to be converted to an (8) unit apartment building. A separate (8) unit garage structure is also proposed to be utilized by future building tenants. Phase 2 consists of (4) individual two story duplex buildings with attached garage. Proposed building plans and exterior elevations for all structures have been included in submitted drawing set. Existing Use of Property: Existing property consists of primarily open grass area, along with an unoccupied abandon (2) story building formerly utilized as a Tavern, and associated asphalt paving remaining from former Tavern, Prior to the Tavern, the building served as a VFW Post. Identification of Structures on the Property and Discussion of their Relationship to the Project: Proposed Development consists of Phases 1 and 2. Phase 1 consists of an alteration and addition to an existing 2 story building. Building is proposed to be converted to an (8) unit apartment building. A separate (8) unit garage structure is also proposed to be utilized by future building tenants. Phase 2 consists of (4) individual two story duplex buildings with attached garage, Projected Number of Residents, Employees, and/or Daily Customers: Proposed Development includes total of (16) dwelling units. The (8) apartments units in Phase 1 are proposed to be (2) bedroom units, and the duplexes indicated in Phase 2, in which the conditional use permit is required, are proposed to be (3) bedrooms per dwelling unit. Assuming maximum occupants of (2) per bedroom, expected maximum number of residents is 80. Proposed Amount of Dwelling Units, Floor Area, Landscape Area, and Parking Area expressed in Square Feet and Acreage to the Nearest One -Hundredth of an Acre: Dwelling Units = (16) total Floor Area: Duplex: 3004 sf; thus 1502 sf per dwelling unit. (8) Unit Apartment: 6797.3 sf per floor x (2) floors = 13,594.6 sf; thus 1699.3 sf per dwelling unit Landscape Area: Ph.1: 6,980.3 sf + Ph. 2: 34,355 sf = 41,335.3 sf grass and landscape beds (41,335.3 sf = .95 acres) Parking and Sidewalk Area: Ph. 1: 10,532.4 sf + Ph. 2: 10,962 sf = 21,494.4 sf (21,494.4 sf = .49 acres) 240 ALGOMA BOULEVARD - SUITE A OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN 54901 TELE: 920.230.4900 www.cwarchitect.net CHET ARCHITECT, LLC Surrounding Land Uses: The majority of adjacent properties consist of single family dwellings, with the exception of a few two flat duplex units in various locations and a Bar/Tavern to the immediate West. Compatability of the Proposed Use with Adjacent and Other Properties in the Area: The majority of adjacent properties consist of single family dwellings, with the exception of a few two flat duplex units in various locations and a Bar/Tavern to the immediate West. The proposed development is, like the majority of neighboring land -uses, soley residential. Traffic Generation: Current zoning ordinances for this proposed land -use require a minimum of 32 parking stalls (including garage stalls). Due to the proposed residential use, Traffic generated by the vehicles going to and from property is anticipated to be spread relatively evenly throughout each day. The traffic generated previously during the parcel's past Tavern use is thought to have been more intense. Other Pertinent Information: Generally, we suggest that this proposed residential development is contextual and compatible to the area. The size of the parcel is abnormally large compaired to other properties in the zoning district, and therefore adequate for and conducive to support duplex residential units. Based on the number of single family and two flat duplex uses at adjacent properties, the proposed duplex use, even though a conditional use, may be more appropriate then other possible conforming uses. Further, the proposed duplex development is believed to be an upgrade to the Community from the current condition of the property, as the currently existing building on the premises is now vacant and not being maintained due to not having occupants or a current use. 240 ALGOMA BOULEVARD - SUITE A OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN 54901 TELE; 920.230.4900 www.cwarchitect.net 12 _T 17TH AVENUE GENERAL SITE NOTES: EXISTING 2 -STORY I ,.n«,ww mwu �unimrn.uon.a.r F:/ :/i PROPOSED �, D/, APARTMENT p�,, I I / / 317E PLAN WORK NOTES: 1eY O ew .ee�R%N`.w�wroncu.w. P.wr e -Id' rV lo.. L °I I o x «en,. e.rAn ee �Pexorro� vew all Jai Am !�_ �.i'*i/,I E 'r . S 4 I©c'oucw"wuuroon""uio°'ee`:w":viaouuiu°n"�woa I {M4 I _ Irl 2-S OR Y 2-S•YITORY / I DI�.IPLEX R! DUPLEX i, 3,004SF/� BUILDING ,3,004 SF/YBUILDING I, OZSF/ WELLING 1,502 SF/ WELLING .I /NEIW /N r I 2 -ST RY 2 -STORY / I rR7 D PLEX /7� /RT DUPLEX C I `l!J 3,004 SF/ UILDING / 3,004 SF/ ¢UIIAING I 1 1,502 SF/ WELLING t,5025F/dWELUNG I I ----------- 1 ag o� a a PROPOSED SITE PLAN eanx CWA 9 W J — � � u �u W p — 4 jF 0 IDCWANchI lLLC O a) O W = _ � O rL Z 2 s W O Q Z w w ti o a � Pfwae , .oa z GOP Suum;T AL ISSUE DATE June a1, 2018 RMSIGNS: 17TH AVENUE SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN Dote: r. mr Honm nrM ELEVATION @_LPSTER ENCLOSURE in WC A 9 W � — Wm Z u W.. D W p — ®CWA—Ifib LLC K O 0 N 0 Jy S _ : O w LIJ E � O oQ Q Z j o Pt�avo i and 2 GDP SUSMIRA 4 ISSUE DATE 1-01,2010 RMSIONS: �t oa.wa 77r," ��ruauuce &DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOOR DETAIL C 1 ®2 8 UNIT APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS (SEE SHEET A201 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS)_ FIRST FLOOR PLAN .wl GARAGE FLOOR PLAN & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: GARAGE FLOOR PLAN LL SECOND FLOOR PLAN wvl m Imo. Mt ne �. a9 �(en CIp141 f{,rylR� ae .LP w ee ___ee}}}1�...�11ini an "4 ISI_1L'llz._If7?�_�F.In��,l_k'���.1`.�'I_frl� �_4Ixy_r�I"fs.�I NORTH CWA W — =zw DWS � W — ®CWANCM1IIocI LLC �wWwLLec IY 0 U' _ z O W = _ D O z Z i w 2 > O Qz =W o�Q z C\l PAma 1 eMtl 2 GDP SUB N'�Al: ISSUE DATE: iWa 01, 2019 REVISIONS: CWe 1619 P EAST & WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION o„ecr.uee� A1101 WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION ld,e"lll �- EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION —1-- CWA uj t 6� 0 z 0 UJ :3 Z W g w f. - w 0;;� PLAN REVIEW SET .ISSUE DAM .APRIL 27,2011 REVISMNS: AZOI W�n 5l.. lei I 1 WON 1resp SOUTH ELEVATION ld,e"lll �- EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION —1-- CWA uj t 6� 0 z 0 UJ :3 Z W g w f. - w 0;;� PLAN REVIEW SET .ISSUE DAM .APRIL 27,2011 REVISMNS: AZOI DUPLEX FLOOR PLANS: FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PLAN DUPLEX EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: ELEVATION LEFT ELEVA REAR ELEVATION t-' —.1 RIGHT ELEVATION TAG NOTES: iiE O OO O _ Oa ._.J.1.1 WC A 9 W' — w m W = 0 w� - 9 i; ®GWA AICNInrJ LLC 0 POnuo I — GDP SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE: June 01. M. REVISIONS: o,etl-- 1619 A20Z REZONE BETTE G COVILL BRAD J/JUDITH A BAHLS 129 W 17TH AVE 1738 OREGON ST 136 W 18TH AVE PC: 05-01-18 OSHKOSH, WI 54902 OSHKOSH, WI 54902 CHRISTINE L EMMER 1743 DOTY ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 EDWARD H PIERCE 1725 DOTY ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 JAMES L POLLNOW 1724 OREGON ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902. JOEL R/MOLL',Y A NOVOTNY 1731 DOTY ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 MATTHEW G MARKS 150 W 18TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 I PHULLIP D SMITH/JULIE STROOK 126 W 18TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 RICHARD A PAULIK 119 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 THOMAS R/JAMIE MUTSCH 55 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 ZWTRCHITZ PROPERTIES LLC 2545 SHOREWOOD DR OSHKOSH, WI 54901 DANIEL J/STEPHANIE J MATAIC 629 MADISON AVE OMRO, WI 54963 ALEX C DOBBERSTEIN. 103 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 JAMES P/NIICHELLE PITZ 303 S MEMORIAL DR APPLETON, WI 54911 JUSTIN J/KATIE E POESCHL 112 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 MICHAEL J KIRSCH 1826 RVIPERIAL RD OSHKOSH, WI 54904 REBECCA J EWALD 1730 OREGON ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 ROBERT P MACKEY 122 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 TODD D/DYANE D CHRISTIE 1721 DOTY ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 DOMINIC A SHAFFER 134 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 JAMES E SMITH 1129 HONEY CREEK CIR OSHKOSH, WI 54904 JEROME MUEHLENBERG 166 W 17TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 MARGARET H VOLKMAN 1752 OREGON ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902. OLIVIA J ACKATZ 144 W 18TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 RENEE L NEMITZ 1720 OREGON ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 RONALD L/KAREN J STOCKINGER 158 W 18TH AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902 WITZKES TAVERN LLC 1700 OREGON ST OSHKOSH, WI 54902 GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES CHET WESENBERG LLC ..240 ALGOMA BLVD 4820 COUNTRY CLUB RD SUITE A OSHKOSH, WI 54902 OSHKOSH, WI 54901 0 I MAE SUBJECT SITE E B Y ,� I Mfge 6 IA i �3 MAE SUBJECT SITE E B es+ L , v v ` N 1 in = 0.03 mi. a 1 in = 150 ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and city. the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the of information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date; 3127/2018 SiICtS www.ci.oshkosh.wi.uslGlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI JAGIS1PIanningVIan Commission Site Plan MapTemplateftn Commission Site Plan MapTemplate.mxd User. minak 19 Y es+ L , v v ` N 1 in = 0.03 mi. a 1 in = 150 ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and city. the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the of information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date; 3127/2018 SiICtS www.ci.oshkosh.wi.uslGlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI JAGIS1PIanningVIan Commission Site Plan MapTemplateftn Commission Site Plan MapTemplate.mxd User. minak 19 City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, aril the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full * disclaimer please go to Printing Date: 312712018 www.cl.oshkosh.vri.uslGlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, W► 8SkQS1 Commission Site Plan Map TemplateRan Commission Site Plan MapTemplate.mxd 20