Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN NOVEMBER 14, 2017 REGULAR MEETING held Tuesday, November 14, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, City Hall Mayor Cummings presided. PRESENT: Council Members Jake Krause, Lori Palmeri, Deb Allison-Aasby, Steven Herman, Caroline Panske, and Mayor Steve Cummings EXCUSED: Council Member Tom Pech, Jr. ALSO PRESENT: Mark Rohloff, City Manager; Pamela Ubrig, City Clerk; Lynn Lorenson, City Attorney; and Allen Davis, Director of Community Development Council Member Krause read the Invocation. The Presentation of Colors was led by Cub Scout Troop 3698. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Faith Lor from Emmeline Cook Elementary School; and, Sierra Pickart from Oaklawn Elementary School. PRESENTATION John Houseal, Principal, Houseal & Lavigne Associates, presented the downtown master plan called Imagine Oshkosh. A copy of the presentation is filed in the City Clerk's office. Council Member Palmeri questioned if Houseal & Lavigne had reached out to any businesses that had left the area to determine what may have kept them in the City. Mr. Houseal explained they had not surveyed businesses that were not located in Oshkosh. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Council Member Palmeri stated it appeared there was only about 6 entities listed as potential partners for the implementation plan. She questioned if there was the possibility of additional partners as it was a hefty responsibility for a small group. Mr. Houseal explained they had identified essential entities that needed to be part of the implementation plan, and believed additional partners would be added. Council Member Palmeri stated she had been concerned that it may overstress entities such as the Greater Oshkosh Economic Development Corporation, however, she understood through their networks they may shift and delegate some responsibility. She explained it was noted in the implementation plan that there was inconsistent design that needed to be brought into harmony. She stated she partially agreed with the statement, however, she had visited other communities where the harmony had resulted in a type of'Disneyfication', and questioned how that would be mitigated. Mr. Houseal stated he agreed, and their design guidelines were not created to dictate architecture. He explained they focused on building orientation, a range of materials and being sensitive to historic buildings within a new development. He explained there was enough guidance to provide structure for decision making, though not rigid to prevent an architect from bringing something unique to a project. Council Member Palmeri stated the central City was already one of the most densely populated in the region, and she had concerns that encouraging residential growth could result in over-densification. She questioned how that would be addressed, other than going vertical, which was only appropriate in certain areas. Mr. Houseal stated there would be an equilibrium that would find itself and market would be the driver of that equilibrium. He explained if a large development was built, it would take up significant market absorption for that type of product for several years. He stated other developers then would have to focus on different needs to remain competitive in the market. He explained individuals who lived in a downtown area anticipated a higher density. Council Member Palmeri stated sites 'H' and 'J' within the Imagine Oshkosh plan were concerning as they reminded her of 'super block'. She explained related to pedestrians and walk-ability, it would be difficult to walk through an area such as this, one would need to walk around an entire block to access another side. Mr. Houseal stated they were existing sites that were not that large, and there were efforts to avoid big voids and maintain walk-ability. 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Council Member Palmeri stated she had used the wrong term; she meant 'soviet block' and not 'super block'. She explained the design concept seemed institutional. Mr. Houseal explained it had been a volumetric study, not a detailed study like what had been completed for the Sawdust District. He stated the purpose was to demonstrate to the development community what could be developed, based on market realities and available properties. He explained they were not recommended site plans and were viable use concepts. Council Member Palmeri questioned if site 'J' would be a transit oriented design due to the lack of parking. Mr. Houseal explained ground floor parking was included with the building. He stated the designs had market and site plan viability by considering items such as parking. Council Member Palmeri questioned if there may be a perception with site 'J' that public access to the waterfront may be diminished. Mr. Houseal stated that it was possible that would be a perception, however, throughout the plan there was public access to the water front with a trail. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2018 City Budget Ordinance 17-536 Approve Amendment to Comprehensive Land Use Maps Changing the Land Use Designation for Properties Located on the South Side of State Highway 91 between Clairville Road & State Highway 44 from Industrial to Residential (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) Council Member Allison-Aasby questioned if Council would need to wait until the second reading of the ordinance to ask questions or comments. Mr. Rohloff stated there was nothing prohibiting Council from discussion during a first reading. Council Member Allison-Aasby stated she had seen the topic on the plan commission agenda and had watched the meeting. She explained the developer had stated there was 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 a need for housing near the companies in the area, especially for those that may have transportation concerns. She stated in theory, she agreed it was a good idea and there was a need in the community. She explained she could understand where it would be helpful in a month to month situation, as the industries in the area often had high turn- over, however, if there were year-long leases she wasn't sure if the development would suit the need. She stated the railroad tracks and transload station were nearby, and she did not believe they were in favor of the development. She explained she understood the plan commission recommended approval, however, she would like to know if it was unanimous approval. She stated with the information she had at the moment she did not believe it was an item she would support. Council Member Herman stated he understood the railroad was not in favor of a having an apartment complex next to their transload station. He explained the site had been moved to the current area due to residents having noise complaints with the railroad. He stated he did not feel the development suited the area and did not believe Oshkosh needed additional apartment complexes. He explained he would not support the development. CITIZEN STATEMENTS Art Rathjen, 2380 Highway 44, on behalf of Greater Oshkosh Economic Development Corporation, invited Council, City staff and members of the community to a presentation on Monday, November 271h from 4:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. at the Menominee Nation Arena. Richard Hulbert, 808 Washington Avenue, stated in July of 2000, he entered into a contract to purchase a duplex. He stated he had never requested for his property to be zoned as single family. He explained at the time of purchase, there was no ordinance regarding fees for inspections or zoning. He stated he had the property for sale, and his potential buyer had informed him that the property was listed with the City as a single family residence. He explained he had obtained legal counsel, who after talking with the City, informed him to send in electric bills showing it had been kept separate. He stated he did so and was then informed he needed to pay a$45 inspection fee. He explained he would not have purchased the duplex originally had the current ordinance been in place, and requested the City to honor the original contract that included no inspections and keep the R-2 zoning status. Mr. Rohloff recommended Mr. Hulbert work with Darryn Burich, Planning Services Manager, to resolve the concern. 4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 CONSENT AGENDA Report of Bills by the Finance Director Receipt & Filing of Oshkosh Museum Board Minutes from October 5, 2017 Receipt & Filing of Common Council Minutes from October 10th, 171h& 241h 2017 Approval of Cash Report from September 2017 Receipt of Claims filed with the City's Insurance Company: A) German Mutual Insurance of behalf of Ron Montgomery for alleged damage to property from a police vehicle Resolution 17-537 Accept Dedication of Street Right of Way; 1212 South Main Street (Plan Commission Recommends Approval; RDA Recommends Approval) Resolution 17-538 Approve Specific Implementation Plan Amendment for Mixed Use Arena/Event Complex; 1212 South Main Street (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) Council Member Palmeri asked for an explanation of the increase in signage allowances related to space modifications. Mr. Davis explained it was based on the applicant's submission of plans, and the uniqueness of the property resonated with the plan commission. He stated there would be restrictions related to the video board and maintaining safety with traffic. Council Member Palmeri stated she understood there had been concerns related to traffic, and questioned if the requirements could be modified in the future. Mr. Davis stated yes, if the signage became a problem related to traffic, it could be addressed in the future. Council Member Palmeri questioned if the 1,582 feet was one sign or a combination of signs. Mr. Davis explained the 1,582 feet was a total of signage for the building fagade. 5 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Resolution 17-539 Approve Specific Implementation Plan for Dog Daycare & Overnight Boarding at 3792 Jackson Street (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) Resolution 17-540 Approve Specific Implementation Plan Amendment for Outdoor Vehicle Storage;3596 Stearns Drive (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) Resolution 17-541 Approve Agreement with Foust Excavating, Inc. for 2017/2018 Snow & Ice Removal Resolution 17-542 Award Bid &Approve 3 Year Agreement with Cintas Fire Protection for Fire Extinguisher Maintenance Services for Various Departments (33,532.35) Resolution 17-543 Approve Change Order #2 for Public Works Contract No. 15-09; Aviation Business Park (+34,875.00) Council Member Herman stated he understood the work was complete and the contract needed to be modified, however, he explained he did not believe any more work should be done in the aviation industrial park until the County held up their end of the deal. Mr. Davis explained the modification to the contract was to allow the Economic Development Administration (EDA) grant to be closed by the end of the year. Council Member Herman questioned if that meant the City was complete with their portion of the project. Mr. Davis stated the City was complete with the EDA funded portion of the project. James Rabe, Director of Public Works, explained a separate water main loop project was underway, although it was not related solely to the aviation business park. Resolution 17-544 Approve Amendment #1 to Professional Service Agreement with Strand Associates, Inc. for Engineering Construction Related Services; Aviation Business Park (+$36,211.00) Resolution 17-545 Strongly Encourage CN Railroad to Cooperate with the City&Allow the Completion of its Critical Stormwater Project at the East 141h Avenue Railroad Crossing 6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Council Member Panske questioned if a timeframe should be added. Ms. Lorenson stated it was difficult to address a timeframe as even if the City requested a response within a week, if it was not met, there would not be a consequence. She explained City staff would continue to work with the railroad and had engaged outside counsel to explore additional options. Council Member Panske questioned if the topic would be put back on the agenda, dependent on the response, or lack thereof, from the railroad. Mr. Rohloff stated City staff would keep Council updated, as it remained an ongoing concern. Council Member Allison-Aasby stated in her experience working with the railroad while serving on Council had always been difficult and response time was slow. Mr. Rohloff explained Senator Johnson and Congressman Grothman had been responsive and supportive. Resolution 17-546 Remove Sustainability Advisory Board Member Resolution 17-547 Approve Appointment to the Sustainability Advisory Board Resolution 17-548 Disallowance of Claim by Susan Vander Grinten Resolution 17-549 Approve Combination "Class B" License, Special Class "B" Licenses & Operator Licenses MOTION: ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA (Herman; second, Allison-Aasby) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings 7 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 ACTION TAKEN ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance 17-550 Modify Parking Regulations on Leeward Court West,North Westfield Street&West 6th Avenue MOTION: ADOPT (Herman; second, Panske) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings Ordinance 17-551 Cancel December 26, 2017 Council Meeting MOTION: ADOPT (Herman; second, Palmeri) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings Ordinance 17-552 Amend Chapter 16 Housing Code of the Municipal Code to Create Section 16-33(A)(10) Pertaining to Carbon Monoxide Detectors & Section 16-46(B) Pertaining to Carbon Monoxide Detectors Penalties FIRST READING; LAID OVER UNDER THE RULES Ordinance 17-553 Repeal & Recreate Portions of Chapter 13 Fire Prevention to Adopt Updated Provisions of The International Fire Code (IFC) & Pertaining to the Forfeiture for Smoke Detector / Carbon Monoxide Detector Violations FIRST READING; LAID OVER UNDER THE RULES Ordinance 17-554 Approve Zone Change from I Institutional District to I-PD Institutional District with Planned Development Overlay; 425 Lake Shore Drive — Water Filtration Plant (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) FIRST READING; LAID OVER UNDER THE RULES Council Member Panske stated an allowance for a barbed-wire fence was included, however, in the plan commission minutes it indicated that Steve Brand, Public Works Utility Manager, stated there was no barbed-wire fence proposed for the project. She 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 questioned if the allowance for the barbed-wire fence needed to be removed from the document prior to Council approval at the next Council meeting. Darryn Burich, Planning Services Manager, explained it would be removed. Resolution 17-555 Approve Imagine Oshkosh / A Master Plan for Our Center City & Central City Investment Strategy (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) MOTION: ADOPT (Allison-Aasby; second, Panske) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings Council Member Panske stated while the plan itself had no fiscal impact, she believed there had been a cost to having Houseal & Lavigne Associates create the plan. She questioned how much that was. Darryn Burich, Planning Services Manager, stated he believed the original contract had been for approximately$150,000. Council Member Panske questioned now that the plan was nearing implementation,how would City staff go back and check off items that had been accomplished. She stated an example was the public arts & beautification committee had been established based on City staff recommendation. Mr. Burich explained the public arts & beautification committee would be able to help facilitate additional recommendations within the plan. Council Member Panske stated that had just been an example. She explained in going through the plan, it was evident the City was headed in the right direction, and questioned if it needed to be noted in the plan that certain items had already been accomplished. Mr. Burich stated no. He explained in reviewing the implementation plan, there was a staggering amount of work ahead of City staff, and they would need a team created to implement the plan. Council Member Panske questioned what the timeframe would be to evaluate the progress that had been made. 9 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Mr. Burich stated it would be ongoing. Council Member Panske stated Go-Transit was in the process of creating a development plan, and had been exploring accessibility within the City. She questioned if they would have access to the Imagine Oshkosh plan to use as a tool. Mr. Burich stated it would be shared with everyone and could be accessed on the City website. Mr. Rohloff explained as City staff worked on the 2019-2020 plan, the Imagine Oshkosh document would be primary to the discussion. He stated he would recommend setting 2 year goals and adjust as opportunities presented themselves, just as the arena had. Council Member Palmeri questioned if it was in the scope of the contract with Houseal & Lavigne to identify any funding for the implementation of the plan. Mr. Davis stated in general terms, when it came to CIPs, tax increment financing, grant programs or partnerships with investors, it would be a case by case basis. He explained establishing funding was part of any implementation plan. Council Member Palmeri questioned if that meant it was part of the scope of the contract with Houseal & Lavigne. Mr. Davis stated it identified some forms of funding although it was not site specific. He reminded Council that Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) had given the City a $50,000 grant as part of the $150,000 contract cost, and the Community Foundation and Chamber of Commerce had paid for part of it as well. He stated the City had received outside funds for nearly half of the contract cost. Council Member Palmeri questioned who had helped in funding the corridor studies. Mr. Davis stated the Community Foundation and Chamber of Commerce had assisted. Council Member Herman questioned how flexible the City would be with the recommended use of space, for example, if there was a shovel ready project, could it be approved despite not being recommended in the plan. Mr. Davis stated there would be a two-step process, as the plan would need to be amended first. 10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Council Member Herman questioned if there were projects ready to begin that fit the recommendations. Mr. Davis explained he believed if the City wished to implement the plan, it was important to wait for projects that matched the recommendations. He stated it may be necessary to forgo short term results to achieve the long term goals of the plan. Council Member Herman questioned if the City would send out something similar to a request for proposal, or provide a document to the Greater Oshkosh Economic Development Corporation, the Chamber of Commerce and other organizations that helped spur development. Mr. Davis stated they would. He explained they would work with the Redevelopment Authority (RDA) to create the request for proposal. He stated any incentive package would appear before Council for approval. Council Member Herman questioned if Council would be consulted regarding the request for proposal. He stated he thought it was important to remain flexible in regards to the implementation, as opportunities and possibilities that had not been considered in the past may appear. Mayor Cummings stated he believed the City needed to have higher standards and use the plan as a guide. He explained he believed the City had been guilty of letting any project develop in the past,which resulted in areas that were piecemeal and lacked vision. He stated he believed the City needed to maintain the character of the downtown and adhere to the standards. Resolution 17-556 Approve 2018 Business Improvement District Operating Plan & Budget MOTION: ADOPT (Allison-Aasby; second, Herman) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings 11 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Resolution 17-557 Approve Engineering Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Construction Monitoring & Documentation Services Related to Construction of Contract No. 17-03 -Mary Jewell Lift Station & Park Shelter ($589,665.00) MOTION: ADOPT (Herman; second, Allison-Aasby) CARRIED: Ayes (4) Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Mayor Cummings Noes (2) Krause, Panske Council Member Herman asked for an explanation of what technical services and construction monitoring meant, as he believed there had been nearly$3 million in change orders related to using AECOM. James Rabe, Director of Public Works, explained the contract would provide full-time, on-site construction observation, review of contractor submittals and functioning as a first point of contact for the contractor. Council Member Herman stated he believed City staff supervised street construction projects and questioned why this would be different. Mr. Rabe explained there was not a City employee capable of completing the inspection and review of HVAC, mechanical, plumbing and additional components of such a facility. He stated City staff was well equipped to manage street projects. Council Member Palmeri stated she had concerns about the inflated price of the contract. She explained she believed the cost warranted a second look, and perhaps the potential for the contract to bid out. Mr. Rohloff explained the project had been designed by AECOM. He stated he understood the concern related to cost, however, the dollar amount as within the range of what was expected when it came to construction monitoring. He explained it was AECOM's design therefore they knew it better than anyone and if there was an issue the engineer on-site would be able to address it immediately. Mr. Rabe stated utilizing the same engineering consultant for design and monitoring was important; if the contractor had questions related to why an item was planned a certain way, the engineer would be able to provide answers and keep the contractor moving. He explained if the contract were to be delayed, it would increase the cost of the project. 12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Council Member Panske questioned what the breakdown of the total cost was and how the City monitored AECOM's time. Mr. Rabe explained there was an hourly rate for the time AECOM staff was on-site, and if the contractor was not on-site, AECOM would not be either. Council Member Panske questioned how City staff monitored that. Mr. Rabe stated City staff attended weekly progress meetings and maintained regular communication with project managers. He explained City staff took an active role in the background of communication and coordination with AECOM's project management team. Council Member Panske stated Council received a number of amendments to AECOM projects. She questioned if there would be an amendment to the cost in the event that AECOM did not need to be on-site as much as anticipated, or if the individual would need to be paid overtime. Mr. Rabe explained if the cost was lower than the anticipated amount, it would not need to come back to Council for approval, as per the municipal code any construction change order or engineering services agreement would be automatically approved. He stated he estimated less than half of contract change orders appeared before Council as there were that many contracts that came in under budget. Council Member Panske questioned if there was a breakdown of charges when City staff received the cost estimate. Mr. Rabe stated yes. Council Member Panske questioned why Council had not received the breakdown of charges. Mr. Rohloff explained it had not been provided in the past. Council Member Panske stated for that high of a cost, it should be provided to Council. Mr. Rohloff stated he would be happy to add that to the agenda in the future. Council Member Panske explained the information provided was not specific enough; she believed for such a high cost, details needed to be considered. 13 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Mr. Rohloff explained City staff did review the details, however, if Council would like the information included in future agendas, he would do so. Council Member Panske stated she was struggling to support the resolution. Council Member Palmeri stated she agreed that the scope of work document would be beneficial and should be included in future agendas when a project cost was high. She explained she believed if it made sense to have the same company complete the project design and monitoring, the contract should include both components and be approved at once. Mr. Rabe stated the challenge related to that was until the design was complete, it was difficult to estimate how much time/effort would be required for monitoring the project. Council Member Palmeri questioned if 20% of the cost of the project was an industry standard. Mr. Rabe stated on a complicated project such as this, it was not unusual. Council Member Krause questioned if it was a typical practice in the industry. He explained it appeared that they were charging a significant amount to ensure their job was done correctly, which should be done correctly to begin with. Mr. Rabe stated the design needed to be complete in order to estimate the construction services needs. He explained the estimate was then reviewed by City staff, who then discussed the proposal with the project managers and identified areas where cutbacks could occur. Council Member Krause questioned if the amount before Council was the original amount or if it had been negotiated. Mr. Rabe stated there had not been a substantial change to the original cost. Council Member Allison-Aasby stated she agreed that because AECOM completed the original design they should be contracted for construction monitoring and documentation services. She explained she believed Council had been experiencing a number of concerns with AECOM during the past 12-18 months. She stated she believed Council would like to see services bid out for similar projects next year. She explained 14 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 the costs were substantial and due to the concerns she believed Council owed it to the constituents to determine if AECOM was the best company to utilize. Mayor Cummings stated he believed Council should be notified when items came in under budget. He questioned if City staff was following procedures that were guided by either state statutes or industry practices. Mr. Rabe stated he didn't understand the question. Mayor Cummings explained he meant the way City staff worked to contract with AECOM or bid out other projects. Mr. Rabe stated the scope of work that City staff was expecting of AECOM was an accepted practice. He explained they also adhered to the City municipal code and any applicable state statutes. Mr. Rohloff explained it was recommended to look beyond cost when it came to dealing with professional engineering services. He stated he understood the concerns Council had related to AECOM, and in the event the City was awarded the Oshkosh Corporation headquarters, City staff would seek proposals for the design. He explained the purchasing ordinance required City staff to provide Council with an annual report,which would be provided after the data was compiled. He stated City staff utilized engineering firms that specialized in the unique areas they serviced. Council Member Herman stated he would like to see the breakdown of cost as well. He explained he believed such services should periodically be bid out as there may be other viable companies capable of doing the work. He stated he had planned on voting 'no', although he had decided to support it because of the status of the project and that AECOM was the original designer. Resolution 17-558 Authorize the filing by Go Transit of 2018 FTA&WISDOT Operating & Capital Assistance Grants as well as County Transportation Assistance MOTION: ADOPT (Palmeri; second, Panske) CARRIED: Ayes (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings 15 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 COUNCIL DISCUSSION, DIRECTION TO CITY MANAGER &FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Mayor Cummings reminded Council of the budget workshop scheduled for Wednesday, November 15 at 5:00 p.m. Council Member Allison-Aasby stated she would not be able to attend. CITIZEN STATEMENTS TO COUNCIL There were no citizen statements to Council. CO UNCIL MEMBER ANNO UNCEMENTS & STATEMENTS Mayor Cummings stated the annual holiday parade would take place on Thursday, November 16th, beginning with a tree lighting at 6:00 p.m. on Main St. 16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 14, 2017 CITY MANAGER ANNO UNCEMENT AND STATEMENT Mr. Rohloff stated the arena project was moving forward and the first game would occur on December 1St. He explained the public infrastructure was progressing, despite the setback with the railroad. He stated Mr. Davis had provided Council with an update on the TIF policy changes, and stated it would likely be brought before Council for approval after January 1, 2018. MOTION: THE COUNCIL MAY CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 19.85(1)(E) OF THE WISCONSIN STATE STATUTES TO DISCUSS BARGAINING OPTIONS, STRATEGY AND PARAMETERS RELATED TO THE NEGOTIATION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL NO. 316, I.A.F.F. OSHKOSH FIRE DEPARTMENT CHIEF OFFICERS, OSHKOSH PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, OSHKOSH POLICE SUPERVISONRS ASSOCIATION AND AFSCME 796 (TRANSIT) WHERE COMPETITIVE BARGAINING REASONS REQUIRE A CLOSED SESSION (Herman; second, Panske). CARRIED: (6) Krause, Palmeri, Allison-Aasby, Herman, Panske, Mayor Cummings MOTION: ADJOURN (Panske; second, Herman) CARRIED: VOICE VOTE The meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m. PAMELA R. UBRIG CITY CLERK 17