HomeMy WebLinkAboutProposal for 1118 South Main, AECOM Proposal No. 592265 r
AECOM
OM
AECOM
555North Main Street
Oshkosh,WI$4901
aec,om.com
Date
December 14, 2016
AECOM Proposal No.
OPP-592265
Mr.Allen Davis
Director of Community Development
City of Oshkosh
215 Church Avenue
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903-1130
Proposal for Environmental Consulting Services Related to the Proposed Site Redevelopment at the
Former Buckstaff Facility, 1118 South Main Street, Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Dear Mr. Davis:
AECOM Technical Services, Inc., (AECOM) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City
of Oshkosh (City) for professional environmental engineering services related to obtaining a Voluntary
Party Liability Exemption (VPLE) and foundation removal bidding and documentation assistance for the
Former Buckstaff Facility located at 1118 South Main Street, Oshkosh, Wisconsin (Subject Property).
AECOM understands that the Subject Property is currently in the process of above ground building
demolition being completed by others. The City of Oshkosh is considering obtaining the property and
completing building foundation removal in addition to pursuing the VPLE in an effort to promote site
redevelopment. AECOM is retained to complete a Phase I Due Diligence Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) and Phase 11 ESA at this site that is eligible for reimbursement under the Wisconsin Economic
Development Corporation (WEDC)grant under a separate contact. This work will be utilized in pursuing
the VPLE for this site.
Site Conditions
The former Buckstaff property dates prior to the turn of the 20th century when the property's low lands
were filled in for construction of the manufacturing facility. Several other buildings were constructed over
time. The manufacturing business operated for over 100 years, but the property fell into foreclosure in
2011. Manufacturing operations ceased the month following the commencement of the foreclosure
proceedings and the buildings have remained vacant since that time. Environmental conditions combined
with the lack of utilities and maintenance on the site, as well as removal of property both during the course
of the foreclosure proceedings and by vandals who have frequented the property have combined to create
blight and a significant risk to the health, safety and welfare of the City and its residents. The site is very
visible as it is located on the main thoroughfare to the south side of the City. The City was awarded a
WEDC grant in 2016 and the owner has begun demolition of the above ground structures remaining on
site.
Three(3) Phase I ESAs and three(3) Phase 11 ESAs were performed on the former Buckstaff property.
An Asbestos Demolition Survey was performed on the former Buckstaff property as well. The Phase I
ESAs identified the following issues:
• STS identified no RECs concerning the Subject Property as a result of the Phase I ESA but the
following environmental concerns were noted:
— Based on the age of the buildings on site, lead-based paint is likely present. However, paint in
poor condition was not observed on the Subject Property.
— Suspected asbestos containing material was observed in the buildings on the Subject Property.
If demolition or renovation of these buildings is planned, the material should be sampled and
removed by a licensed abatement contractor accordingly.
C,1UsersldarleneblAppData\LocaPA4icrosoft\Windows\Temporary Internet
ASCOM
The railroad activity on the north central portion of the Subject Property introduces uncertainties
with past use. However, historic Sanborn maps depict no railroad structures on the Subject
Property and the nearest tracks were approximately 100 feet further east. In addition, the
Sanborn maps indicate the trains were coal fired and not petroleum. Because the trains were
coal fired and the nearest railroad activity occurred at least 100 feet from the Subject Property, it
is unlikely the railroad use impaired the Subject Property.
— Several areas of hydraulic oil surface staining were observed in the central portion of Parcel 1.
According to Buckstaff personnel, the stained areas have since been removed and properly
disposed of by maintenance personnel.
— Burned debris was observed in the central portion of Parcel 1. According to Buckstaff personnel,
the burned debris has since been removed and properly disposed of by maintenance personnel.
— A soil pile containing some concrete of unknown origin was observed in the northeast corner of
Parcel 4. No stained soil or stressed vegetation was observed on the stockpile.
• Robert E. Lee&Associates, Inc. (REL) Phase I ESA identified the following RECs:
— The presence of fill and lack of analytical information regarding whether it is impacted represents
an environmental concern.
— The lack of analytical data to determine the environmental condition of unsaturated soil at the
Subject Property represents an environmental concern.
— Arsenic was detected in a soil sample collected from STS Boring B-14. Additional investigation
is needed.
-- Additional investigation is warranted in the area between Building 1, 2, and 7 based on the past
land use of the adjacent buildings.
— The past presence of a former rail spur at the Subject Property represents an REC.
-- The past storage of coal in the area between Building 1, 2, and 7 represents an REC.
— There is concern for potential off-site impacts from the Everitt Industries property; and
represents an REC.
— Past presence of a railroad roundhouse along the east property line represents an REC.
-- The presence of an exhaust fan along the south wall of Building 6 represents an REC.
• Sigma Phase I ESA identified the following RECs:
Robert E. Lee &Associates, Inc. (REL) conducted a limited subsurface investigation of the
Subject Property in 2011, Low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals
were identified in the fill layer at the property. REL reported the results of the limited
investigation to the WDNR in August 2011. The WDNR opened a Wisconsin Environmental
Repair Program (ERP) case for the subject property(BARTS#02-71-559897) based on the
contaminants identified by REL.
One historical recognized environmental condition (HREC)was identified as follows:
■ To determine if historical operations negatively impacted the Subject Property, limited soil
sampling investigations were conducted in 2006 and 2011 at the Subject Property. A review
of the results from the limited investigation conducted in 2006 by STS Consultants, Ltd.
(STS) indicated that low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals were
present at the Subject Property. In a letter dated August 16, 2007, the WDNR concluded
that the Subject Property(BRRTS#02-71-549299) case met the requirements of Ch. NR
726, Wisconsin Administrative Code and considered the case closed with no further
investigation or remediation required.
C:1Users%darleneblAppDatalLocaRMicrosoftlWindowslTemporary Intemet
FilesLContent.0ut400k185GKSHKB\OPP-592255_Bucksta(t VPLE Consulting Services
• r
AC0M
While the BRRTs case was closed by the WDNR, residual soil and groundwater contamination
remains at the Subject Property. Additionally, historic fill containing organics, sawdust, cinders
and woodchips are prevalent at the Subject Property to a depth of 4 feet with fill identified as
deep as 10 feet below ground surface (bgs). Fill material and residual soil and groundwater
impacts could be encountered during redevelopment activities. Contaminated soil or
groundwater that is discovered would require appropriate management in accordance with
applicable state and federal regulations.
An off-site REC was identified during the preparation of the Phase I ESA. The off-site REC is as
follows:
■ The properties that adjoin the Subject Property were historically utilized for
industriallmanufacturing uses. Operations included a furniture manufacturer,junk yard and
steel fabrication company to the north, railroad ROW and a round house to the east and a
plastic factory to the south. A release from historical operations performed at the adjoining
properties could have negatively impacted the Subject Property.
Based on the results of the Phase I ESAs, three different Phase 11 ESAs were performed on the Subject
Property. Sigma prepared a Phase 11 Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) to further assess the identified
RECs. On October 10, 2013 Sigma was granted approval from the WDNR to precede with the proposed
Phase II investigation activities under the WDNR EPAAssessment grant. The Phase 11 investigation
activities, as proposed in the October 7, 2013 SAP were initiated at the Buckstaff property in late October
2013. All of the Phase 11 ESA efforts focused on the exterior of the buildings.
The Phase 11 ESA activities included the advancement of 36 soil borings, installation of 9 groundwater
monitoring wells and collection of soil and groundwater analytical samples. One or two soil samples were
collected from each boring and submitted under standard chain of custody for laboratory analysis of VOCs
using EPA method 8260, PAHs using EPA method 8310, and RCRA metals using EPA method 6010
(arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver). Ground water samples were
collected from the five monitoring wells by REL and Sigma for RCRA metals, PAHs, and VOCs.
Analysis performed on the Phase 11 ESAs soil samples indicates the following:
• VOCs—A detection of benzene within the soil sample collected from 2 to 4 feet bgs at soil boring
GP-12 exceeded the Groundwater Pathway Residual Contaminant Level (RCL), Within deeper soil
samples collected below the fill layer, all VOC constituents were reported less than the laboratory
limit of detection or between the limit of detection (LOD)and limit of quantitation (LOQ).
• PAHs--Detectable concentrations of almost all PAH constituents were reported within shallow site
soil. The soil samples collected from 2 to 4 feet bgs within soil borings GP- 1, GP-4, GP-5, GP-6,
GP-9, GP-10, GP-11 and GP-12 reported concentrations of benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene,
benzo(b)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)-anthracene, and indeno(1 ,2,3cd)pyrene greater than
Groundwater Pathway RCLs and/or Non-Industrial Direct Contact RCLs. Within deeper soil samples
collected below the fill layer, all PAH constituents were reported between the LOD and LOQ or less
than the laboratory limit of detection.
• RCRA Metals-- Detectable concentrations of barium, cadmium, lead, mercury, and selenium
exceeded applicable Groundwater Pathway RCLs within multiple shallow soil samples.
Concentrations of arsenic within multiple soil samples were reported greater than Groundwater
Pathway RCLs and/or Non-Industrial DC RCLs. However, with the exception of two high
concentrations, 193 and 33.6 milligrams per kilogram (mglkg), the detected concentrations of arsenic
are below 8 mg/kg, which was established as the statewide soil-arsenic background threshold value.
Analysis performed on the Phase 11 ESAs groundwater samples indicates the following:
• VOCs—Each of the VOC constituents were reported less than laboratory method detection limits
within collected groundwater samples.
C:XUsersldarlenebVAppDatalLocai\MicrosoRNWindows\Temporary Internet
Fifes)Content.0utbokMGKSHKMOPP-592265_Buckstaff VPLE Consulting Services
!r"'lS<rOM
• PAHs—Reported concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(a)fluoranthene, and chrysene within
groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-6 exceed their respective Ch.
NR 140 Preventive Action Limits (PALS). The other PAH constituents within collected groundwater
samples were reported less than laboratory method detection limits or Ch. NR 140 PALS.
• Dissolved RCRA Metals- Reported concentrations of arsenic within groundwater samples collected
from monitoring wells MW-6, MW-7 and MW-12 exceed its Ch. NA 140 PAL. The other dissolved
RCRA metals within collected groundwater samples were reported less than laboratory method
detection limits or below Ch. NA 140 PALs.
Based on the data collected during the recent Phase It site investigation activities conducted at the site,
the following conclusions are presented;
• Visual and olfactory observations completed during the Phase 11 did not reveal staining, odors or
other evidence to suggest that the lead and PAH detections at the site were related to the areas of
concern assessed as part of the Phase 11. Rather, visual and olfactory observations suggest that the
detected concentrations are most likely associated with urban fill placed on the site prior to site
development in the late 1800s. If the areas with lead and PAW detections are disturbed in the future,
the soil will likely require management as a solid waste in general accordance with local, state, and
federal laws. Consequently, there are health and safety concerns associated with PAHs and metals
in the subsurface on the former Buckstaff property including the potential for direct contact with the fill
material.
• The soil profile at the former Buckstaff property consists of approximately 2 to 10 feet of fill consisting
of silt, gravel, sand layers, cinders and wood pieces. Native silty clay was present below the fill.
• Shallow groundwater is present within the site groundwater monitoring wells at elevations ranging
from 749.65 to 748.75 msl, approximately 2 to 3 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction is assumed
to be generally to the east based on the site's proximity to Lake Winnebago.
• VOC constituents were reported less than laboratory method detection limits within collected
groundwater samples. Three PAH constituents and dissolved arsenic were reported greater than
their respective Ch. NA 140 PALS within groundwater samples collected from select monitoring wells.
No analyzed contaminant concentrations with collected groundwater samples exceeded Ch. NA 140
Enforcement Standards (ESs).
• Based on the subsurface investigation data, the vapor intrusion pathway does not appear to be a
concern. Chlorinated volatile organic compounds were not reported at concentrations greater than
laboratory detection limits and reported concentrations of detected petroleum volatile organic
constituents are well below EPA Risk Screening Levels for the Inhalation pathway (US EPA's
Regional Screening Level Resident Soil Table, May 2013).
• According to the Sigma Phase 11 ESA, Phase Il ESA activities were restricted to the exterior of the
buildings due to access and building conditions. The Sigma report recommended additional site
investigation should be completed following demolition of the buildings to further assess the fill soils.
A recent site review identified two areas of concern where additional site investigation is warranted
beyond the fill soil assessment; Fuel oil staining was observed on the outside of building 13 and on the
ground surface and leaking containers, staining of the floor, and strong odors were observed in Building
15.
The recent review of the current site conditions also confirmed the conclusions in the Sigma report for
additional site investigation should be completed following demolition of the building to further assess the
fill soils. This is in part to the rapid decay of the structures and the type of construction of the building.
The alder buildings (Nos 1 through 15 and 23) are elevated three feet.
This proposal presents our understanding of this project, site knowledge, and previous VPLE experience
on several City of Oshkosh sites. This proposal outlines our recommended scope of work and estimated
C:1Usersldarieneb3 AppCatalocalWicrosoftlwindowslTemporary Internet
Fitoskcontent.Outlook185GKSHKB\CPP-5822135—Buckstaff VPLE Consuldng Services
AECOM
fee for submitting a request for a VPLE for the site development and providing foundation removal bidding
assistance and foundation removal documentation services.
Prolect Understanding
The City of Oshkosh is considering promoting site redevelopment by applying for a site VPLE. The VPLE
is a vital part of Brownfield redevelopment. AECOM has successfully assisted the City in obtaining
several VPLEs in the Marion/Pearl Redevelopment area. Based on previous VPLE experience, we
propose the following scope of work tasks:
Task A:Prepare a VPLE Exemption Application and Lease Liability Clarification Request to be submitted
to the WDNR.
Task B:Prepare a Subsurface Investigation Work Plan and Soil and Groundwater Management Plan for
remedial activities for WDNR Approval.
Task C:Interface with WDNR regulatory agency and the Proposed Developer to provide assistance in
receiving WDNR approval for site building plans.
Task D: Provide on-site documentation of various components during site construction activities
related to environmental issues.
Task E:Prepare a report for Certification of Completion (COC)of VPLE.
Task F:Assist with preparation of Foundation Removal Demolition Project Bidding Documents and Bidding
Assistance.
Task G:Provide Foundation Removal Documentation.
This proposal assumes that the City will pay all WDNR fees associated with obtaining the VPLE. We
anticipate a$250 application, $700 Liability Clarification, and$4,000 for WDNR VPLE review, and
$19,000 for VPLE insurance fees.
Scope of Services
Task A: Prepare a VPLE Exemption Application and Lease Liability Clarification Request to be
Submitted to the WDNR
AECOM will prepare a VPLE Exemption Application and a request a Lease Liability Clarification from the
WDNR. This request is required based on the developer financial backing requirements. WDNR Form
4400-237 will be completed on behalf of the developer and submitted to WDNR.
Deliverables:
AECOM will prepare WDNR Form 4400-178 and 4400-237 and required attachments. The City will
provide the checks for the WDNR review fees in the amounts of$250 (Application), $4,000 (VPLE
Review) and$700 (Liability Clarification).
Task B: Prepare a Subsurface Investigation Work Plan and Soil and Groundwater Management
Plan for remedial activities for WDNR Approval
AECOM will prepare a Work Plan based on the WEDC grant approved Phase ll subsurface investigation.
A Soil and Groundwater Management plan that takes into consideration the proposed site development
will also be prepared. The plan will also include a Sanitary Discharge Permit Application for disposal of
the impacted groundwater generated during construction. The plan will be submitted to the WDNR for
C:1UsersWarleneblAppData\LocalWicrosoftlWindows\Temporary Internet
FileslContenWutlookMGKSHMOPP-592265_Buckstaff VPLE Consulting Services
A=COM
review, approval and incorporated into the contractor construction documents. The site acquisition plan
and schedule for completion of the Phase I and Phase Il has been modified since submittal of the WDEC
grant. Subsequent changes require completion of two (2) separate Phase I and Phase 11 reports, two(2)
mobilizations of subcontract drillers and expedited laboratory analytical costs to meet the new project
deadlines. Additional costs incurred for site visits, subcontractor mobilizations, and expedited laboratory
costs above what is budgeted in the WDEC grant are included in this task.
AECOM will complete a Phase 11 subsurface investigation for this site in December 2016 and February
2017. The additional subsurface information will be taken into consideration in regards to the proposed
building layout and design features for redevelopment of the site.
Deliverables:
AECOM will prepare one draft copy of the work plan, soil and groundwater management plan, and
sanitary discharge permit application for review and comment. Afinal copy will be submitted in FDF
format to the WDNR and/or the City for approval and incorporation into the Developers project bid and
construction documents. .
Task C: Interface with WDNR regulatory agency and the Proposed Developer to provide assistance
in receiving WDNR approval for site building plans
AECOM will prepare correspondence summarizing pertinent details regarding the pursuit of the VPLE.
These documents will be provided to the WDNR for review and consideration. We anticipate that twelve
(12) meetings with the team members and will be required. In addition,AECOM will review site
redevelopment bidding and construction documents to provide comments and construction details to be in
compliance with WDNR VPLE guidelines.
Deliverables
AECOM will prepare memorandums, emails and meeting summaries as necessary through the project
and distribute to appropriate team members. AECOM will provide one set of review comments on bidding
and construction documents to the developer. Once bidding and construction documents are completed,
AECOM will submit the documents to WDNR for review and approval.
Task D: Provide on-site documentation of various components during site construction
activities related to environmental issues.
AECOM will provide trained environmental field staff:to document the construction of the environmental
components of the project. These components include: Soil Management, Contaminated Groundwater
Management, underground Utilities, Vapor Mitigation and Site Capping. We have estimated 5 weeks of
full time field documentation including equipment and supplies.
Soil Management
We propose to have an AECOM representative on site to observe and identify the excavation areas
containing impacted soil requiring disposal. This will be accomplished through visual and olfactory
observations (sheen, petroleum product, stained soils, and petroleum odors), and field screening of the
soils excavated for obvious signs of contamination. The AECOM field staff will use a photo ionization
detector(PID)to field screen the excavated soils. PID field screening readings of 15 instrument units
(equivalent to ppm) or higher will be considered contaminated and hauled to the Valley Trail Facility.
Nonpetroleum impacted fill soils/solid waste that can be reused for site fill will be segregated and reused.
Nonpetroleum/solvent impacted fill soils/solid waste deemed not usable as backfill material will be hauled
to the Valley Trail Facility for disposal.
The contaminated soil disposed of in a landfill requires manifesting, which needs a signature by an
authorized representative of the City of Oshkosh. To expedite the processing of the landfill profile
acceptance applications and soil removal activities for this project, the City of Oshkosh will delegate authority
C:lUserswarloneblAppDatalLocafWlcrosoftlwindowslTemporary Internet
Fifes\Content.CutlookMGKSHKBIOPP-592265 Buckstaff VPi_E consulting Services
ASCOM
to AECOM to sign the waste profile application and transportation manifests on behalf of(acting as an agent
for)the City of Oshkosh. It is understood that the City of Oshkosh will remain the responsible party for all
final decisions regarding management and disposal of contaminated materials encountered during this
project. By authorizing this proposal, the City of Oshkosh will also be authorizing Paul F. Timm and his
designees of AECOM to act as the authorized agent for the City of Oshkosh for completing the waste profile
and transportation manifests, as needed, to dispose the contaminated soil under this contract.
Contaminated Groundwater Management
We anticipate that groundwater removed from the project excavations will be collected and pumped into
the Oshkosh sanitary sewer system under the conditions that will be provided in the temporary discharge
permit obtained byAECOM. AECOM proposes to be on site periodically to make sure the contractor is
discharging groundwater in accordance with the anticipated temporary discharge permit.
Underground Utilities
We anticipate utilities running through the solid waste fill and petroleum impacted areas could create
routes of less resistance for gases and liquids to migrate into and from the site. in compliance with
anticipated permit requirements, utilities entering and leaving the project area limits will have a trench
plug. Trench plugs will be placed where the utility line enters a structure. AECOM proposes to document
the location, construction, and size of each trench plug.
Vapor Mitigation
We anticipate a vapor barrier, comprised of an impermeable liner and passive venting system will be
installed below structure slabs and foundations to prevent the migration of moisture and vapors produced
by the solid waste fill and/or petroleum impacts left in place. This vapor barrier, consisting of a
polyethylene (PE) geomembrane sealed at the seams, provides a continuous barrier between the subsoil
and floor slab. The passive venting system will be comprised of perforated piping between the building
foundations, floor slab, and subsoil. AECOM proposes to document this barrier's installation.
Site Capping
AECOM will document the site capping components. These components include the paved parking lot, lined
storm water biofilters/pave drain, fabric warning barrier under landscape areas, and building base slab.
Project Team
AECOM proposes a team comprised of Paul Timm, Project ManagerlProject Representative,Andrew
Mott, Senior Environmental Consultant and Mark Magee, Field Staff. This proposed team has been
selected to provide AECOM staff that understand client expectations, have extensive previous VPLE
experience, have been involved with similar projects, understand respective project responsibilities, are
located locally, and provide a reasonable cost approach with sensitivity to overall project cost.
Deliverables
AECOM field notes, photos and appropriate information will be summarized in the VPLE Certificate of
Completion (COG)Application Report.
Task E: Prepare a report for Certification of Completion (COC)of VPLE.
AECOM will prepare one draft Certification of Completion (COC) Request for review. The report will include
all pertinent field, laboratory,WDNR correspondence information and a request for COC. Final review
comments will be incorporated for submission to WDNR.
CaUsersWarlenebWppDatalLocaRMiorosoRlwindowslTemporary Internet
FlleslContent.0utluoM5(3KSHKBIOPP-592265_Buckstaff VPLE Consulting Services
ASCO ill
Deliverables
AECOM will prepare one draft COC Request for review. f=inal review comments will be incorporated for
submission to WDNR. Two copies will be provided to the City, Developer and WDNR along with electronic
copies.
Task F:Assist with preparation of Foundation Removal Demolition Project Bidding Documents and
Bidding Assistance
AECOM will prepare and/or complete the following assistance with Foundation Removal Bidding
Documents:
• Prepare a draft of the Official Notice to Contractors. The City will finalize and submit to advertising
agencies per the Municipal Bidding Requirements.
• Prepare draft Special Provisions to be included with City of Oshkosh typical Engineering bidding
documents. The City will combine the required documents and post them on Quest per the City of
Oshkosh Engineering Bidding procedures.
• AECOM will provide bidding assistance during the bidding process. We anticipate one site visit with
bidders, answering questions via email and preparing one draft bidding addendum. The City will
finalize the addendum and post it on Quest.
Deliverables
AECOM will prepare the required draft documents and submit them to the City in electronic format.
Task G. Provide Foundation Removal Documentation
AECOM will provide a Project Representative Services on a as need basis on a day to day basis during
the construction of the project. We anticipate an overall construction period of 9 weeks for completion of
the removal of foundations and capping of site utilities.
AECOM will provide on-site documentation and testing staff as needed during the duration of the project.
Field and Laboratory testing will be provided as identified in this scope of work to document compliance
with project plans and specifications. In addition, we will work with the City and contractor on
administration issues. A summary of tasks is provided below.
CaUsersWarteneblAppDatalocaRMkTosoftlWindowslTemporary Internet
FiledContent.outlook%5GKSHKBIOPP-592265_Buckstaff VPLE consulting Services
• r
ACOM
• Provide a part time Project Field Representative on site during site demolition events.
Document and communicate to the contractor erosion control issues.
• Review contractor's progress schedule, schedule of submittals/submissions, and consult with the City
concerning their completeness and acceptance.
+ Serve as the liaison between the City and the contractor, and assist City with implementing the
intent of the contract documents.
• Monitor receipt of samples from contractor, and notify the City of their availability for examination and
provide an opinion of completeness and accuracy as compared to the project plans and
specifications.
• Conduct site observations of the work in progress, determine if the work is generally proceeding in
accordance with the contract documents, and that completed work appears to conform to the contract
documents.
• Transmit to contractor the City's clarifications and interpretations of the contract documents.
• Maintain correspondence files, reports of job conferences, shop drawings, and sample submissions,
reproductions or original contract documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, and
additional drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the contract. Provide copies of all
construction documents in electronic format to the City after completion of the project.
• Maintain reports for the construction contract recording weather conditions when on the job site; data
relative to questions of extras or deductions; list of daily activities; decisions; observations in general;
and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures.
• Prepare necessary field modification documents in accordance with instructions from the City.
• Furnish the City with weekly reports of progress of the work and the Contractor's compliance with the
approved progress schedule. Prepare weekly meeting agendas and minutes. Keep the City
informed of any expected delays in progress schedule. Prepare and distribute meeting minutes
• Report to the City whenever the Project Representative believes that any work is unsatisfactory,
faulty or defective, or does not conform to the Contract Documents and advise if work should be
corrected or rejected.
• [notwithstanding that it is the contractor's sole responsibility for job site safety,AECOM will report
immediately to the City the occurrence of any accident.
• Provide Field testing to document conformance with plans and specifications. Record horizontal and
vertical coordinates of individual test so as to allow later identification and inclusion in the project
construction documents. Testing to include: Nuclear density compaction testing for granular backfill.
• Provide photo documentation throughout the construction period
• Provide field notes and location diagram of foundations removed and utilities capped at the property
boundaries. This information will be provided to the developer to be utilized during construction.
• Provide vehicles, necessary equipment, and material for inspection
• Before issuance of the"Certificate of Substantial Completion,"AECOM will prepare and submit to the
contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction.
• Conduct a final inspection in the company of the City and contractor, and prepare a final list of items
to be completed or corrected.
AECOM proposes a team comprised of Paul Timm, Project Manager/Project Representative, and Chad
Wilson or Chris Rogers, Field Staff. This proposed team has been selected to provide AECOM staff that
understand client expectations, have previous project involvement, have been involved with similar
projects, understand respective project responsibilities, are located locally, and provide a reasonable cost
approach with sensitivity to overall project cost.
C:IUsersWarleneblAppDatalLocaKMicrosoftlwindowslTemporary Internet
FileslContent.Outlook185GKSHKB10PP-592265_Buckstaff VPI.B Consulung Services
AECOM
Project Fees
The following table summarizes our estimate of fees to complete the scope of services described above.
Task Fee
Task A: Prepare a VPLE Exemption Application and Lease Liability Clarification $5,500
Request to be submitted to the WDNR
Task B: Prepare a Subsurface Investigation Work Plan and Soil and Groundwater $21,500
Management Plan for remedial activities for WDNR Approval
Task C: Interface with WDNR regulatory agency and the Proposed Developer to $14,500
provide assistance in receiving WDNR approval for site building plans (12 meetings)
*Task D: Provide on-site documentation of various components during site $25,500
construction activities related to environmental issues (5 weeks)
Task E: Prepare a report for Certification of Completion (COC)of VPLE $20,000
**Task F:Assist with preparation of Foundation Removal Demolition Project Bidding $20,000
Documents and Bidding Assistance
Task G: Provide Foundation Removal Documentation (9 weeks) $26,500
Total $143,500
Notes
*Task D-Construction Documentation field staff budget based on field and office effort of 8 hours per day,
five days per week for duration of 5 weeks or an estimated total of 200 hours of field staff. The budget
also includes supplies, equipment rental, and truck charges and project management.
**Task G Foundation Removal Documentation field staff budget based on field and office effort of 3 hours
per day, five days per week for duration of 9 weeks or an estimated total of 135 hours of field staff. The
budget also includes supplies, equipment rental, and truck charges and project management.
Terms and Conditions
Services described in this proposal will be performed on a time-and-expense/unit-cost basis. The project
services will be performed in accordance with the 2017 Negotiated Fee Schedule for various elements of
service we expect will be utilized providing the services outlined in this proposal. This project will be
complete per the negotiated April 2009 Negotiated Terms and Conditions.
C:lUsersklarieneblAppDatalLocallMicrosoftlwindowslTemporary Internet
FileslContent.OutlookIB5GKSHKBkOPP-592265_Duckstsff VPLB consulting services
AECOM
Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by having an authorized individual of the City execute
the attached Authorization Form and return it to our Oshkosh office. If you have any questions regarding
the proposed scope of services and corresponding costs, please contact us at your convenience.
Yours sincerely,
AE Technical Services, Inc.
z'—
aul F. Timm Kevin L. Brehm, P.F.
\jccount Manager Associate Vice President
]incl: Authorization
C:1UsersldarleneblAppData\LocaRMicrosoftlW'indomITemporary Internet
FileslContent.Outlook185GKSHKBIOPP-592265_Buckstaff VPLE Consulting Services
A COM
Authorization
December 14, 2016
1 hereby certify that the necessary provisions have been made to pay the liability which will accrue under
this contract.
1 hereby authorize AECOM to proceed with the scope of work outlined in the proposal for Environmental
Consulting Services Related to the Proposed Site Redevelopment at the Former Buckstaff Facility, 1118
South Main Street, Oshkosh,Wisconsin AECOM's proposal OPP-592265 dated December 14, 2016 with
a budget authorization of$143,500 under the general terms and conditions specified in the proposal.
Signature Date
Mark A Rohloff
Print Name
City Manager
Title/Organization
O ' ,Ya, :. -
Signature Date
Pamela R, Ubri
Print Name
City Clerk
Title/ rganization
ralaa azI�Q
LqDAtdr) Date
Lynn A. Lorenson
Print Name
City Attorney
Title/Organization
JT" IM I�n
Signature Dat-
Trena Larson
Print Name
Director of Finance
Title/Organization
C:1UsersAarleneblAppDatalLocaRMlorosoftlwlndowslTemporary tnternet