HomeMy WebLinkAbout06. 17-302 JUNE 27, 2017 17-302 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE AND SUBMIT 2016 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE
ANNUAL REPORT/WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the 2016
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report, having been reviewed, is approved, and the
proper City officials are authorized and directed to submit the Report to the Department of
Natural Resources.
A&
City
of
Oshkosh
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Stephan M. Brand, Public Works Utility Bureau Manager
DATE: June 22, 2017
RE: Approve and Submit 2016 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Compliance
Maintenance Annual Report/ Wastewater Treatment Plant
BACKGROUND
The City of Oshkosh is required by the WDNR as part of the Wisconsin Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit to
complete a Compliance Maintenance Annual Report. This report outlines the performance of the Wastewater Treatment
Plant and sanitary sewer collection system for the previous year. The results reflect the dedication of the Wastewater
Utility staff and their commitment to protecting the community's public health and water environment. This report
needs to be formally approved by the Common Council for submittal to the WDNR by June 30, 2017.
ANALYSIS
The report is broken down into sections that address specific areas of performance for the wastewater system. Based on
the responses in each section, a score is determined and a letter grade is given based on the score. This grade is used by
the WDNR to determine the need for improvements to the wastewater treatment system. A letter grade of A or B does
not require any action be taken based on the information provided. The following is a brief summary of each section:
Influent Flow and Loading: This section looks at plant flow capacity and treatment ability based on the design of the
facility. Our highest flow month for 2016 was March with a monthly average flow of 19.02 million gallons per day, which
is 54% of our design flow of 35 million gallons per day. Normal months are closer to 36% of design flow with an average
of 12.7 million gallons per day. The treatment capacity is based on Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in pounds per
day. Our highest influent loading monthly average was 16,061 pounds in the month of February. Our design loading is
33,360 pounds, which puts us at 48.1% of our design loading for the facility. This section has been updated to include
questions on flow meter calibration, the Sewer Use Ordinance, Septage Receiving (Hauled Waste Delivered to the Plant),
and the Pretreatment Program. No issues were identified in any of these areas. Based on these responses and the
available capacity of the facility, this section scored a letter grade A.
Effluent Quality — BOD, TSS (Total Suspended Solids) Ammonia and Phosphorus: These sections look at the quality
of our treatment individually for each of these parameters based on our permit requirements. There is a regulatory limit
for mercury and, as noted in the enclosed report, we exceeded our mercury limit on one (1) sample. We did subsequent
testing and analysis on the potential cause for this one (1) exceedance, which is also explained in the enclosed report. All
subsequent testing was within permit limits. The sections for BOD, TSS, Ammonia, and Phosphorus each scored a letter
grade A.
Biosolids Management: Solids are generated from the treatment process due to the growth of microorganisms that are
used for the treatment of wastewater. There is a separate process used to treat this material as it is removed and turn it
into a product that can be beneficially re -used as fertilizer on approved agricultural land. This section of the report
1: \ Engineering \Tracy Taylor\ Memos to Mayor & Common Council \ 2017 \ 2017 WDNR W WTP CMAR_6-22-17.docx
evaluates the treatment process and management of the biosolids in compliance with the permit requirements. All
requirements were met and this section scored a letter grade A.
Staffing and Preventative Maintenance: This section asks general questions about plant maintenance procedures, record
keeping, and staffing levels. There were no issues identified with either plant maintenance or staffing and this section
scored a letter grade A.
Operator Certification and Education: The WDNR requires wastewater facilities have state -certified operators on staff to
operate and manage the facilities to meet the requirements of the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permit. Certified operators are required to attend approved conferences and training to meet continuing education
requirements for the certification renewal every three (3) years. We have certified operators on staff who are certified at
the appropriate levels for the wastewater treatment facility. This section scored a letter grade A.
Financial Management: This section looks at the financial aspects of the utility and is done with the assistance of the
Finance Department. In addition to rates, it looks at the funding in the Equipment Replacement Fund, which is required
as a condition of the Clean Water Fund when financing projects through the Clean Water Fund Financial Assistance
Program. We have also started including projects listed in the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) in the Future
Planning section to show future potential spending requirements. There were no issues identified and this section scored
a letter grade A.
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems: This section is completed using information provided by the Streets Division and
Engineering Division, based on the activities reported for sanitary sewer maintenance and construction in 2016. There
was one (1) sanitary sewer overflow reported, due to a force main break that occurred just outside the Snell Road Lift
Station. As noted in the enclosed report, it was fully contained and cleaned up. This force main and lift station were
eliminated with the Snell West construction project, which installed a new gravity sewer and a new lift station to replace
the existing Fountain Avenue Lift Station. Based on the activities reported, this section scored a letter grade A.
Efforts continue to reduce clear water entry into the sanitary sewer system. Flow monitoring and inspection of manholes
for rehabilitation continues, along with televising to identify sanitary sewers in need of replacement. Sanitary sewer
repair and replacement projects are ongoing and reflected in the CIP. The Capacity Management Operations and
Maintenance program has been fully implemented and continues to provide opportunities to update and refine
operations and maintenance activities related to the sanitary sewer system. The System Evaluation and Capacity
Assurance Plan has also been completed and includes a City-wide sanitary sewer model. This model continues to be used
to analyze the capacity of the sanitary sewer system in specific areas under various dry and wet weather scenarios to
determine where there may be capacity issues and to look at corrective action opportunities. It is also being used
extensively in CIP planning and area planning studies for future sewer requirements.
RECOMMENDATIONS
I recommend approval of the 2016 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report for submittal to the WDNR.
Approved,
7Rohloff
11 ' ��/
Mark
City Manager
SMB/tlt
I:\ Engineering \Tracy Taylor\ Memos to Mayor & Common Council \2017\2017 WDNR W WTP CMAR_6-22-17.docx
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Influent Flow and Loading
1. Monthly Average Flows and (C)BOD Loadings
1.1 Verify the following monthly flows and (C)BOD loadings to your facility.
Design Factor
x
Outfall No. Influent Monthly x Influent Monthly
701 Average Flow, MGD Average (C)BOD
Concentration mg/L
x 8.34 = Influent Monthly
Average (C)BOD
Loading, lbs/day
Max Month Design Flow, MGD
35
January 12.4715 x 131
x 8.34 = 13,641
= 31.5
x 100
February
Design (C)BOD, lbs/day
33360
x
11.9576
x
161
x
8.34 =
16,061
March
19.0186
x
93
x
8.34 =
14,779
April
15.9711
x
115
x
8.34 =
15,285
May
12.2709
x
152
x
8.34 =
15,516
June
12.9187
x
134
x
8.34 =
14,413
July
10.7750
x
161
x
2. Maximum Monthly Design Flow and Design (C)BOD Loading
2.1 Verify the design flow and loading for your facility.
14,481
August
9.9347
x
171
x
8.34 =
14,168
September
11.9636
x
147
x
8.34 =
14,658
October
10.5451
x
160
2.2 Verify the number of times the flow and (C)BOD exceeded 90% or 10011/o of design, points
earned, and score:
8.34 =
14,059
November
9.5230
x
163
x
8.34 =
12,960
December
10.2828
x
160
x
8.34 =
13,709
Design
Design Factor
x
%
_ % of Design
Max Month Design Flow, MGD
35
x
90
= 31.5
x 100
= 35
Design (C)BOD, lbs/day
33360
x
11.9576
x
161
x
8.34 =
16,061
March
19.0186
x
93
x
8.34 =
14,779
April
15.9711
x
115
x
8.34 =
15,285
May
12.2709
x
152
x
8.34 =
15,516
June
12.9187
x
134
x
8.34 =
14,413
July
10.7750
x
161
x
8.34 =
14,481
August
9.9347
x
171
x
8.34 =
14,168
September
11.9636
x
147
x
8.34 =
14,658
October
10.5451
x
160
x
8.34 =
14,059
November
9.5230
x
163
x
8.34 =
12,960
December
10.2828
x
160
x
8.34 =
13,709
Design
Design Factor
x
%
_ % of Design
Max Month Design Flow, MGD
35
x
90
= 31.5
x 100
= 35
Design (C)BOD, lbs/day
33360
x
90
= 30024
X 100
= 33360
Months Number of times
of flow was greater
Influen than 90% of
0
Number of times
flow was greater
than 100% of
Number of times
(C)BOD was greater
than 90% of design
Number of times
(C)BOD was greater
than 100% of design
January 1
0
0
0
0
February 1
0
0
0
0
March 1
0
0
0
0
April 1
0
0
0
0
May 1
0
0
0
0
June 1
0
0
0
0
July 1
0
0
0
0
August 1
0
0
0
0
September 1
0
0
0
0
October 1
0
0
0
0
November 1
0
0
0
0
December 1
0
0
0
0
Points per each
2
1
3
2
Exceedances
0
0
0
0
Points
0
0
0
0
Total Number of Points
0
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
3. Flow Meter
3.1 Was the influent flow meter calibrated in the last year?
• Yes Enter last calibration date (MM/DD/YYYY)
8/08/2016
o No
If No, please explain:
4. Sewer Use Ordinance
4.1 Did your community have a sewer use ordinance that limited or prohibited the discharge of
excessive conventional pollutants ((C)BOD, SS, or pH) or toxic substances to the sewer from
industries, commercial users, hauled waste, or residences?
• Yes
o No
If No, please explain:
4.2 Was it necessary to enforce the ordinance?
o Yes
• No
If Yes, please explain:
5. Septage Receiving
5.1 Did you have requests to receive septage at your facility?
Septic Tanks Holding Tanks Grease Traps
• Yes • Yes • Yes
*No 0 N 0 N
5.2 Did you receive septage at your faclity? If yes, indicate volume in gallons.
Septic Tanks
• Yes k10650 gallons
o No
Holding Tanks
• Yes 6274653 gallons
o No
Grease Traps
• Yes 124500 gallons
o No
5.2.1 If yes to any of the above, please explain if plant performance is affected when receiving
any of these wastes.
No adverse effects noticed in plant performance.
6. Pretreatment
6.1 Did your facility experience operational problems, permit violations, biosolids quality concerns,
or hazardous situations in the sewer system or treatment plant that were attributable to
commercial or industrial discharges in the last year?
o Yes
• No
If yes, describe the situation and your community's response.
6.2 Did your facility accept hauled industrial wastes landfill leachate etc.?
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
o Yes
• No
If yes, describe the types of wastes received and any procedures or other restrictions that were
in place to protect the facilitv from the discharge of hauled industrial wastes.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (BOD/CBOD)
1. Effluent (C)BOD Results
1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for BOD or
CBOD
Outfall No. Monthly
001 Average
Limit (mg/L)
90% of
Permit Limit
> 10 (mg/L)
Effluent Monthly
Average (mg/L)
Months of
Discharge
with a Limit
Permit Limit
Exceedance
90% Permit
Limit
Exceedance
January 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
February 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
March 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
April 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
May 25
22.5
2
1
0
0
June 25
22.5
2
1
0
0
July 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
August 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
September 25
22.5
3
1
0
0
October 25
22.5
5
1
0
0
November 25
22.5
4
1
0
0
December 25
22.5
4
1
0
0
* Equals limit if limit is <= 10
Months of discharge/yr
12
Points per each exceedance with 12 months of discharge
7
3
Exceedances
0
0
Points
0
0
otal number of points
0
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to state waters, the points per monthly
exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by
the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months
of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0
1.2 If anv violations occurred, what action was taken to reaain compliance?
2. Flow Meter Calibration
2.1 Was the effluent flow meter calibrated in the last year?
• Yes Enter last calibration date (MM/DD/YYYY)
10/19/2016—�
o No
If No, please explain:
3. Treatment Problems
3.1 What problems, if any, were experienced over the last year that threatened treatment?
There were no problems that threatened treatment in 2016.
4. Other Monitoring and Limits
4.1 At any time in the past year was there an exceedance of a permit limit for any other pollutants
such as chlorides, pH, residual chlorine, fecal coliform, or metals?
* Yes
o No
In
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
If Yes, please explain:
4th quarter 2016 Effluent Mercury sample exceeded 3.6ng/I with a result of 4.8 ng/l.
The Mercury PMP program was developed and implemented in 2007. Plant Staff have been
actively working with various sectors in implementing and maintaining BMP's for their facilities.
Sewer cleaning records were reviewed at the time of the sampling and jetting was done near the
WWTP and in the vicinity of some commercial facilities where legacy material may have been
present. In order to verify if this could be a continuing problem or just an anomaly, samples
were collected and analyzed for Mercury in the four weeks following the receipt of the initial test.
Those results are listed below:
10/27/16 2.2 ng/I
11/02/16 3.0 ng/I
11/09/16 2.8 ng/I
11/16/16 2.3 ng/I
Based on this data, it does not appear that this is going to be an ongoing problem.
4.2 At any time in the past year was there a failure of an effluent acute or chronic whole effluent
toxicity (WET) test?
o Yes
• No
If Yes, please explain:
4.3 If the biomonitoring (WET) test did not pass, were steps taken to identify and/or reduce
source(s) of toxicity?
o Yes
o No
• N/A
Please explain unless not applicable:
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Total Suspended Solids)
1. Effluent Total Suspended Solids Results
1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for TSS:
Outfall No. Monthly
001 Average
Limit (mg/L)
90% of
Permit Limit
>10 (mg/L)
Effluent Monthly
Average (mg/L)
Months of
Discharge
with a Limit
Permit Limit
Exceedance
90% Permit
Limit
Exceedance
January 30
27
6
1
0
0
0
March 30
February
6
1
0
0
April 30
27
6
1
0
0
May 30
27
4
1
0
0
June 30
27
5
1
0
0
July 30
27
9
1
0
0
August 30
27
7
1
0
0
September 30
27
8
1
0
0
October 30
27
12
1
0
0
November 30
27
12
1
0
0
December 30
27
10
1
0
0
*Equals limit if limit is <= 10
Months of Discharge/yr
12
Points per each exceedance with 12
months of discharge:
7
3
Exceedances
11
0
0
Points
0
0
otal Number of Points
0
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to state waters, the points per monthly
exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by
the number of months of discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication
factor is 12/6 = 2.0
1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 -Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
30
27
9
1
0
0
March 30
27
6
1
0
0
April 30
27
6
1
0
0
May 30
27
4
1
0
0
June 30
27
5
1
0
0
July 30
27
9
1
0
0
August 30
27
7
1
0
0
September 30
27
8
1
0
0
October 30
27
12
1
0
0
November 30
27
12
1
0
0
December 30
27
10
1
0
0
*Equals limit if limit is <= 10
Months of Discharge/yr
12
Points per each exceedance with 12
months of discharge:
7
3
Exceedances
0
0
Points
0
0
otal Number of Points
0
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 -Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Ammonia - NH3)
1. Effluent Ammonia Results
1.1 Verify the following monthly and weekly average effluent values, exceedances and points for
ammonia
Outfall No. Monthly Weekly Effluent Monthly Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Weekly
001 Average Average Monthly Permit Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Permit
NH3 NH3 Average Limit Average Average Average Average Limit
Limit Limit NH3 Exceed for Week for Week for Week for Week Exceed
(mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) ance 1 2 3 4 ance
January 38 .0616129 03 0
February 38 .1237931 103 0
March 38 .1974193 55 0
April 23 .1123333 3 0
May
June
July
August
September
October
0
November 39 .05166661-37 0
December 39 .0916129P3 0
Points per each exceedance of Monthly average: 10
Exceedances, Monthly: 0
Points: 0
Points per each exceedance of weekly average (when there is no monthly averge): 2.5
Exceedances, Weekly: 0
Points: 0
otal Number of Points 0
NOTE: Limit exceedances are considered for mothly OR weekly averages but not both. When a
monthly average limit exists it will be used to determine exceedances and generate points. This
will be true even if a weekly limit also exists. When a weekly average limit exists and a monthly
limit does not exist, the weekly limit will be used to determine exceedances and generate points.
1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 -Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Phosphorus)
1. Effluent Phosphorus Results
1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for Phosphorus
Outfall No. 001 Monthly Average Effluent Monthly Months of Permit Limit
phosphorus Limit Average phosphorus Discharge with a Exceedance
(mg/L) (mg/L) Limit
January 1 0.2 1 0
FebruarF y 1 0.3 1 0
March 1 0.2 1 0
April
1
0.2
1
0
May 1
0.2
1
0
June 1
0.2
1
0
July 1
0.4
1
0
August 1
0.3
0
0
September 1
0.3
i
0
October 1
0.5
1
0
November 1
0.5
1
0
December 1
0.3
1
0
Months of Discharge/yr
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly
exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by
the number of months of discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor
is 12/6 = 2.0
1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
12
I
10
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 -Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
1
0.2
1
0
May 1
0.2
1
0
June 1
0.2
1
0
July 1
0.4
1
0
August 1
0.3
1
0
September 1
0.3
i
0
October 1
0.5
1
0
November 1
0.5
1
0
December 1
0.3
1
0
Months of Discharge/yr
12
Points per each exceedance with 12 months of discharge:
10
Exceedances
0
Total Number of Points
O
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 -Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Biosolids Quality and Management
1. Biosolids Use/Disposal
1.1 How did you use or dispose of your biosolids? (Check all that apply)
® Land applied under your permit
❑ Publicly Distributed Exceptional Quality Biosolids
❑ Hauled to another permitted facility
❑ Landfilled
❑ Incinerated
❑ Other
NOTE: If you did not remove biosolids from your system, please describe your system type such
as lagoons, reed beds, recirculating sand filters, etc.
1.1.1 If you checked Other, please describe:
2. Land Application Site
2.1 Last Year's Approved and Active Land Application Sites
2.1.1 How many acres did you have?
1225 acres
2.1.2 How man acres did you use?
06 acres
2.2 If you did not have enough acres for your land application needs, what action was taken?
2.3 Did you overapply nitrogen on any of your approved land application sites you used last year? 0
o Yes (30 points)
• No
2.4 Have all the sites you used last year for land application been soil tested in the previous 4
years?
• Yes
o No (10 points)
o N/A
3. Biosolids Metals
Number of biosolids outfalls in your WPDES permit:
3.1 For each outfall tested, verify the biosolids metal quality values for your facility during the last
calendar year.
Outfall No. 002
- Cake sludge
Parameter
80%
of
Limit
H.Q.
Limit
Ceiling Jan
Limit
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun
Jul Aug
Sep
Oct Nov Dec
800/o High
Value Quality
Ceiling
Arsenic
41
75
12
6.5
7.3
12
9.6
12
0
0
Cadmium
39
Ss
.76
.47
.71
.79
.81
.73
0
0
Copper
1500
4300 1
620
1 1 450
1 580
1 610
1 660
1 680
0
0
Lead
300
840
28
18
29
25
29
24
0
0
Mercury
17
57
.35
.46
.47
.24
.7
<.25
0
0
Molybdenum
60
75
18
13
18
23
28
21
0
0
Nickel
336
420
27
20
26
25
35
27
0
0
Selenium
80
100
4.8<2
6.9
3.5
3.3
4.7
0
0
Zinc
2800
7500
870
640
670
630
790
17401
0
0
3.1.1 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the high quality limits OR 80% of the limit for
molybdenum, nickel, or selenium = 0
Exceedence Points
0 0 (0 Points)
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
0 1-2 (10 Points)
o > 2 (15 Points)
3.1.2 If you exceeded the high quality limits, did you cumulatively track the metals loading at
each land application site? (check applicable box)
o Yes
o No (10 points)
• N/A - Did not exceed limits or no HQ limit applies (0 points)
o N/A - Did not land apply biosolids until limit was met (0 points)
3.1.3 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the ceiling limits = 0
Exceedence Points
• 0 (0 Points) 0
0 1 (10 Points)
o > 1 (15 Points)
3.1.4 Were biosolids land applied which exceeded the ceiling limit?
o Yes (20 Points)
• No (0 Points)
3.1.5 If any metal limit (high quality or ceiling) was exceeded at any time, what action was taken?
Has the source of the metals been identified?
4. Pathogen Control (per outfall):
4.1 Verify the following information. If any information is incorrect, use the Report Issue button
under the Options header in the left -side menu.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
1/01/2016 - 02/29/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
Yes
Land Applied:
No
Process:
lAnaerobic Digestion
Process Description:Hydraulic
detention time greater than 15 days at
5 degrees centri rade.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
1/01/2016 - 12/31/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
Yes
Land Applied:
Yes
Process:
Anaerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
35 de rees centi rade.
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
3/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
Yes
Land Applied:
No
Process:
Anaerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
35 degrees centri rade.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
5/01/2016 - 06/30/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
es
Land Applied:
No
Process:
naerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
35 clecirees centigrade.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
7/01/2016 - 08/31/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
es
Land Applied:
No
Process:
naerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
35 degrees centigrade,
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
9/01/2016 - 10/31/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
Yes
Land Applied:
Yes
Process:
naerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
135 de rees centigrade.
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit:
Sample Dates:
11/01/2016 - 12/31/2016
Density:
Sample Concentration Amount:
Requirement Met:
Yes
Land Applied:
Yes
Process:
Anaerobic Digestion
Process Description:
Hydraulic detention time greater than 15 days at
35 degrees centigrade.
4.2 If exceeded Class B limit or did not meet the process criteria at the time of land application.
4.2.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at the time of land application?
o Yes (40 Points)
• No
If yes, what action was taken?
5. Vector Attraction Reduction (per outfall):
5.1 Verify the following information. If any of the information is incorrect, use the Report Issue
button under the Options header in the left -side menu.
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 02/29/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 12/31/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: es
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 02/03/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable): gt;=38
Results (if applicable): 70.10
Ic
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 02/03/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: Yes
Limit (if applicable): >=38
Results (if applicable): 70.10
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 04/20/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable): gt;=38
Results (if applicable): 58.10
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 04/30/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 06/30/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 06/08/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable): gt;=38
Results (if applicable): 2.50
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 08/31/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 08/10/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: No
Limit (if applicable): gt;=38
Results (if applicable): 54.20
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 10/31/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: IYes
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 10/05/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: Yes
Limit (if applicable): >=38
Results (if applicable): 53.40
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 12/07/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: Yes
Limit (if applicable): >=38
Results (if applicable): 60.10
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Outfall Number: 002
Method Date: 12/31/2016
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Incorporation when land apply
Requirement Met: Yes
Land Applied: Yes
Limit (if applicable):
Results (if applicable):
5.2 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at the time of land application?
o Yes (40 Points)
• No
If yes, what action was taken?
6. Biosolids Storage
6.1 How many days of actual, current biosolids storage capacity did your wastewater treatment
facility have either on-site or off-site?
'*>= 180 days (0 Points)
0 150 - 179 days (10 Points)
0 120 - 149 days (20 Points)
0 90 - 119 days (30 Points) 0
o < 90 days (40 Points)
o N/A (0 Points)
6.2 If you checked N/A above, explain why.
7. Issues
7.1 Describe any outstanding biosolids issues with treatment, use or overall management:
There are no problems with treatment, use or overall management.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants)
1. Plant Staffing
1.1 Was your wastewater treatment plant adequately staffed last year?
• Yes
o No
If No, please explain:
Could use more help/staff for:
1.2 Did your wastewater staff have adequate time to properly operate and maintain the plant and
fulfill all wastewater management tasks including recordkeeping?
* Yes
o No
If No, please explain:
2. Preventative Maintenance
2.1 Did your plant have a documented AND implemented plan for preventative maintenance on
major equipment items?
• Yes (Continue with question 2)
o No (40 points)
If No, please explain, then go to question 3:
2.2 Did this preventative maintenance program depict frequency of intervals, types of lubrication,
and other tasks necessary for each piece of equipment?
• Yes
0
o No (10 points)
2.3 Were these preventative maintenance tasks, as well as major equipment repairs, recorded and
filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly?
• Yes
o Paper file system
o Computer system
• Both paper and computer system
o No (10 points)
3. O&M Manual
3.1 Does your plant have a detailed O&M and Manufacturer Equipment Manuals that can be used
as a reference when needed?
* Yes
o No
4. Overall Maintenance /Repairs
4.1 Rate the overall maintenance of your wastewater plant.
• Excellent
o Very good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
Describe your rating:
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
The Staff at the Oshkosh WWTP are very proactive in performing preventative maintenance,
identifying problems and making the correct repairs to keep this facility running efficiently,
making it a very dependable operation.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Operator Certification and Education
1. Operator -In -Charge
1.1 Did you have a designated operator -in -charge during the report year?
• Yes (0 points)
o No (20 points)
Name:
KEVIN R SORGE
Certification No:
33081
2. Certification Requirements
2.1 In accordance with Chapter NR 114.56 and 114.57, Wisconsin Administrative Code, what level
and subclass(es) were required for the operator -in -charge (OIC) to operate the wastewater
treatment plant and what level and subclass(es) were held by the operator -in -charge?
Sub
Class
SubClass Description
WWTP OIC
Advanced OIT Basic Advanced
Al
Suspended Growth Processes
X X
A2
Attached Growth Processes
A3
Recirculating Media Filters
A4
Ponds, Lagoons and Natural
A5
Anaerobic Treatment Of Liquid
B
Solids Separation
X X
C
Biological Solids/Sludges
X X
P
Total Phosphorus
X X
N
Total Nitrogen
D
Disinfection
X X
L
Laboratory
X X
U
Unique Treatment Systems
SS
Sanitary Sewage Collection
X NA NA NA
2.2 Was the operator -in -charge certified at the appropriate level and subclass(es) to operate this
plant? (Note: Certification in subclass SS, N and A5 not required in 2016; subclass SS is basic level
only.)
• Yes (0 points)
o No (20 points)
3. Succession Planning
3.1 In the event of the loss of your designated operator -in -charge, did you have a contingency plan
to ensure the continued proper operation and maintenance of the plant that includes one or more
of the following options (check all that apply)?
® One or more additional certified operators on staff
❑ An arrangement with another certified operator
❑ An arrangement with another community with a certified operator
❑An operator on staff who has an operator -in -training certificate for your plant and is expected to
be certified within one year
❑ A consultant to serve as your certified operator
❑ None of the above (20 points)
If "None of the above" is selected, please explain:
4. Continuing Education Credits
❑c
F11
0
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
4.1 If you had a designated operator -in -charge, was the operator -in -charge earning Continuing
Education Credits at the following rates?
OIT and Basic Certification:
o Averaging 6 or more CECs per year.
o Averaging less than 6 CECs per year.
Advanced Certification:
• Averaging 8 or more CECs per year.
o Averaging less than 8 CECs per year.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Financial Management
1. Provider of Financial Information
Name:
Ken Gabrielson
Telephone:
920)232-5321 (XXX)XXX-XXXX
E -Mail Address
(optional):
2. Treatment Works Operating Revenues
2.1 Are User Charges or other revenues sufficient to cover O&M expenses for your wastewater
treatment plant AND/OR collection system ?
• Yes (0 points)
o No (40 points)
If No, please explain:
2.2 When was the User Charge System or other revenue source(s) last reviewed and/or revised?
Year:
016
0
• 0-2 years ago (0 points)
0 3 or more years ago (20 points)
o N/A (private facility)
2.3 Did you have a special account (e.g., CWFP required segregated Replacement Fund, etc.) or
financial resources available for repairing or replacing equipment for your wastewater treatment
plant and/or collection system?
• Yes (0 points)
o No (40 points)
REPLACEMENT FUNDS PUBLIC MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SHALL COMPLETE QUESTION 3
3. Equipment Replacement Funds
3.1 When was the Equipment Replacement Fund last reviewed and/or revised?
Year:
2016
0 1-2 years ago (0 points)
0 3 or more years ago (20 points)
0 N/A
If N/A, please explain:
3.2 Equipment Replacement Fund Activity
3.2.1 Ending Balance Reported on Last Year's CMAR $ 1,895,154.25
3.2.2 Adjustments - if necessary (e.g. earned interest, $ 0.0
audit correction, withdrawal of excess funds, increase
making up previous shortfall, etc.)
3.2.3 Adjusted January 1st Beginning Balance 1,895,154.25
3.2.4 Additions to Fund (e.g. portion of User Fee,
earned interest, etc.) +429,740.79
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
3.2.5 Subtractions from Fund (e.g., equipment
replacement, major repairs - use description box
3.2.6.1 below*)
3.2.6 Ending Balance as of December 31st for CMAR
Reporting Year 2,324,895.0
All Sources: This ending balance should include all
Equipment Replacement Funds whether held in a
bank account(s), certificate(s) of deposit, etc.
3.2.6.1 Indicate adjustments, equipment purchases, and/or major repairs from 3.2.5 above.
3.3 What amount should be in your Replacement Fund? 2,324,895.0
0
Please note: If you had a CWFP loan, this amount was originally based on the Financial
Assistance Agreement (FAA) and should be regularly updated as needed. Further calculation
instructions and an example can be found by clicking the SectionInstructions link under Info
header in the left -side menu.
3.3.1 Is the December 31 Ending Balance in your Replacement Fund above, (#3.2.6) equal to, or
greater than the amount that should be in it (#3.3)?
• Yes
o No
If No, please explain.
4. Future Planning
4.1 During the next ten years, will you be involved in formal planning for upgrading, rehabilitating,
or new construction of your treatment facility or collection system?
* Yes - If Yes, please provide major project information, if not already listed below.
o No
Project Project Description Estimated Approximate
# Cost Construction
Year
1 Digester draft tube mixers 4500000 2018
2 WWTP rooftop exhaust fan replacement engineering 10000C 2017
3 NWTP roof top exhaust fan replacement - construction 50000C 2018
4 Zomputer and server replacement 1500C 2018
5 CC 1-11 replacement 660000C 2021
6 eplace grit classifiers 8500C 2017
7 3unhoqua Lift station(Mary Jewel) 350000C 2018
8 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 100000C 2017
9 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2018
10 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2019
11 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2020
12 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2021
13 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2022
14 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2023
15 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 150000C 2024
16 1&1 removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 175000C 2025
17 SS removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 175000C 2026
18 &I removal, Sewer rehab., emergency repairs of sewers 175000C 2027
19 Dregon Street interceptor sewer improvements 825000C 2017
20 larious sewer relays. 440000 2018
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant
Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
21
Dregon Street Sewer improvements.
381710C
2019
22
Dregon Street sewer improvements
776230C
2020
23
NWTP seal aeration tanks
7500C
2017
24
Digester complex roof repairs
3000C
2017
25
hlorine contact chamber refurbishment
30000C
2018
26
Digester membrane roof replacement
9500C
2018
27
Phosphorous compliance Project, design, bidding, construction.
2790000C
2019
28
Phosphorous compliance Project, design, bidding, construction.
2500000C
2020
29
Phosphorous compliance Project, design, bidding, construction.
2500000C
2021
30
Phosphorous compliance Project, design, bidding, construction.
2500000C
2022
31
ontrol room UPS
5000C
2024
32
Digester #2 cleaning
7000C
2018
33
Digester #3 cleaning
7000C
2019
34
Digester #1 cleaning
7000C
2020
35
Digester floor replacement #3 and #4
2021
36
WTP HVAC replacement
A
2019
37
AFT controls upgrade
2019
5. Financial Management General Comments
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND USE
6. Collection System
6.1 Energy Usage
6.1.1 Enter the monthly energy usage from the different energy sources:
COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMPAGE: Total Power Consumed
Number of Municipally Owned Pump/Lift Stations:
6.1.2 Comments:
Electricity Consumed
(kWh)
Natural Gas Consumed
(therms)
January
66,247
5,015
February
61,382
7,814
March
83,107
5,420
April
76,197
2,794
May
52,706
675
June
63,907
75
July
52,294
99
August
77,184
91
September
56,650
124
October
46,113
815
November
55,085
3,141
December
55,359
5,466
Total
746,231
31,529
Average
62,186
2,627
6.1.2 Comments:
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
6.2 Energy Related Processes and Equipment
6.2.1 Indicate equipment and practices utilized at your pump/lift stations (Check all that apply):
® Comminution or Screening
® Extended Shaft Pumps
® Flow Metering and Recording
❑ Pneumatic Pumping
® SCADA System
® Self -Priming Pumps
® Submersible Pumps
® Variable Speed Drives
❑ Other:
6.2.2
Comments:
6.3 Has an Energy Study been performed for your pump/lift stations?
• No
o Yes
Year:
By Whom:
Describe and Comment:
F7_ 1
-
6.4 Future Energy Related Equipment
6.4.1 What energy efficient equipment or practices do you have planned for the future for your
pump/lift stations?
Upgrade MCC's, Eliminate old starters and soft starts and replace with VFD's. Eliminating lift
stations when applicable.
7. Treatment Facility
7.1 Energy Usage
7.1.1 Enter the monthly energy usage from the different energy sources:
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
TREATMENT PLANT: Total Power Consumed/Month
7.1.2 Comments:
7.2 Energy Related Processes and Equipment
7.2.1 Indicate equipment and practices utilized
❑ Aerobic Digestion
® Anaerobic Digestion
❑ Biological Phosphorus Removal
❑ Coarse Bubble Diffusers
at your treatment facility (Check all that apply):
® Dissolved 02 Monitoring and Aeration Control
❑ Effluent Pumping
® Fine Bubble Diffusers
® Mechanical Sludge Processing
® Nitrification
® SCADA System
❑ UV Disinfection
® Variable Speed Drives
❑ Other:
7.2.2 Comments:
7.3 Future Energy Related Equipment
7.3.1 What energy efficient equipment or practices do you have planned for the future for your
treatment facility?
Electricity
Consumed
(kWh)
Total Influent
Flow (MG)
Electricity
Consumed/
Flow
(kWh/MG)
Total Influent
BOD (1000 lbs)
Electricity
Consumed/
Total Influent
BOD
(kWh/1000lbs)
Natural Gas
Consumed
(therms)
January
627,020
386.62
1,622
422.87
1,483
2,548
February
588,812
346.77
1,698
465.77
1,264
2,125
March
704,181
589.58
1,194
458.15
1,537
1,790
April
669,076
479.13
1,396
458.55
1,459
1,182
May
567,928
380.40
1,493
481.00
1,181
342
June
118,892
387.56
307
432.39
275
275
July
657,569
334.03
1,969
448.91
1,465
26
August
638,523
307.98
2,073
439.21
1,454
22
September
652,274
358.91
1,817
439.74
1,483
32
October
82,570
326.90
253
435.83
189
747
November
645,022
285.69
2,258
388.80
1,659
1,448
December
572,408
318.77
1,796
424.98
1,347
2,629
Total
6,524,275
4,502.34
5,296.20
13,166
Average
543,690
375.20
1,490
441.35
1,233
1,097
7.1.2 Comments:
7.2 Energy Related Processes and Equipment
7.2.1 Indicate equipment and practices utilized
❑ Aerobic Digestion
® Anaerobic Digestion
❑ Biological Phosphorus Removal
❑ Coarse Bubble Diffusers
at your treatment facility (Check all that apply):
® Dissolved 02 Monitoring and Aeration Control
❑ Effluent Pumping
® Fine Bubble Diffusers
® Mechanical Sludge Processing
® Nitrification
® SCADA System
❑ UV Disinfection
® Variable Speed Drives
❑ Other:
7.2.2 Comments:
7.3 Future Energy Related Equipment
7.3.1 What energy efficient equipment or practices do you have planned for the future for your
treatment facility?
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
LED lighting, replace MCC's, High efficiency blowers, High efficiency motors, VFD replacement,
occupancy sensors.
8. Biogas Generation
8.1 Do you generate/produce biogas at your facility?
o No
• Yes
If Yes, how is the biogas used (Check all that apply):
❑ Flared Off
® Building Heat
® Process Heat
❑ Generate Electricity
® Other:
We pipe the Methane that would normally go to our flare over to the university of Oshkosh for
them to scrub and utilize.
9. Energy Efficiency Study
9.1 Has an Energy Study been performed for your treatment facility?
o No
• Yes
❑ Entire facility
Year:
2016
By Whom:
H2Hill
Describe and Comment:
® Part of the facility
Year:
2016
By Whom:
H2M
Describe and Comment:
A study was performed on out influent pumping as well as our aeration system.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems
1. Capacity, Management, Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM) Program
1.1 Do you have a CMOM program that is being implemented?
• Yes
o No
If No, explain:
1.2 Do you have a CMOM program that contains all the applicable components and items
according to Wisc. Adm Code NR 210.23 (4)?
* Yes
o No (30 points)
o N/A
If No or N/A, explain:
1.3 Does your CMOM program contain the following components and items? (check the
components and items that apply)
® Goals [NR 210.23 (4)(a)]
Describe the major goals you had for your collection system last year:
Cleaning 20% of the collection system each year.
.5 complaints per sewer mile.
Zero backups per sewer mile
Zero SSO's
Did you accomplish them?
o Yes
• No
If No, explain:
We had Sewer backups and one SSO.
® Organization [NR 210.23 (4) (b)]
Does this chapter of your CMOM include:
® Organizational structure and positions (eg. organizational chart and position descriptions)
® Internal and external lines of communication responsibilities
® Person(s) responsible for reporting overflow events to the department and the public
® Legal Authority [NR 210.23 (4) (c)]
What is the legally binding document that regulates the use of your sewer system?
ewer Use Ordinance
If you have a Sewer Use Ordinance or other similar document, when was it last reviewed and
revised? (MM/DD/YYYY) 1/01/2017
Does your sewer use ordinance or other legally binding document address the following:
® Private property inflow and infiltration
® New sewer and building sewer design, construction, installation, testing and inspection
® Rehabilitated sewer and lift station installation, testing and inspection
®Sewage flows satellite system and large private users are monitored and controlled, as
necessary
® Fat, oil and grease control
® Enforcement procedures for sewer use non-compliance
® Operation and Maintenance [NR 210.23 (4) (d)]
Does your operation and maintenance program and equipment include the following:
® Equipment and replacement part inventories
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
® Up-to-date sewer system map
®A management system (computer database and/or file system) for collection system
information for O&M activities, investigation and rehabilitation
® A description of routine operation and maintenance activities (see question 2 below)
® Capacity assessment program
® Basement back assessment and correction
® Regular O&M training
® Design and Performance Provisions [NR 210.23 (4) (e)]
What standards and procedures are established for the design, construction, and inspection of
the sewer collection system, including building sewers and interceptor sewers on private
property?
® State Plumbing Code, DNR NR 110 Standards and/or local Municipal Code Requirements
® Construction, Inspection, and Testing
❑ Others:
® Overflow Emergency Response Plan [NR 210.23 (4) (f)] 0
Does your emergency response capability include:
® Responsible personnel communication procedures
® Response order, timing and clean-up
® Public notification protocols
® Training
® Emergency operation protocols and implementation procedures
® Annual Self -Auditing of your CMOM Program [NR 210.23 (5)]
® Special Studies Last Year (check only those that apply):
® Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) Analysis
® Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)
® Sewer Evaluation and Capacity Managment Plan (SECAP)
❑ Lift Station Evaluation Report
❑ Others:
2. Operation and Maintenance
2.1 Did your sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program include the following
maintenance activities? Complete all that apply and indicate the amount maintained.
Cleaning 1 25. % of system/year
Root removal
Flow monitoring
Smoke testing
Sewer line
televising
Manhole
inspections
Lift station O&M
Manhole
rehabilitation
Mainline
rehabilitation
inspections
1.6 % of system/year
21 % of system/year
—IO % of system/year
9. % of system/year
53 % of system/year
10 # per L.S./year
2. % of manholes rehabbed
1. % of sewer lines rehabbed
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
2.3 % of system/year
Private sewer I/I
removal 2. % of private services
River or water
crossings 2 % of pipe crossings evaluated or maintained
Please include additional comments about your sanitary sewer collection system below:
We are aggressively identifying sewers in need of replacement thru inspections and televising.
3. Performance Indicators
3.1 Provide the following collection system and flow information for the past year.
3-4-79A Total actual amount of precipitation last year in inches
31
1 12.2721
1 589.5761
Annual average precipitation (for your location)
Miles of sanitary sewer
Number of lift stations
Number of lift station failures
Number of sewer pipe failures
Number of basement backup occurrences
Number of complaints
Average daily flow in MGD (if available)
Peak monthly flow in MGD (if available)
Peak hourly flow in MGD (if available)
3.2 Performance ratios for the past year:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
48.
0.
4. Overflows
Lift station failures (failures/year)
Sewer pipe failures (pipe failures/sewer mile/yr)
Sanitary sewer overflows (number/sewer mile/yr)
Basement backups (number/sewer mile)
Complaints (number/sewer mile)
Peaking factor ratio (Peak Monthly:Annual Daily Avg)
Peaking factor ratio (Peak Hourly:Annual Daily Avg)
LIST OF SANITARY SEWER (SSO) AND TREATMENT FACILITY (TFO) OFERFLOWS REPORTED
**
Date
Location
Cause
Estimated
Volume (MG)
0
8/22/2016 11:00:00 AM
Broken forcemain at Snell Road Pump Station.
0.0344 - 0.0344
08/22/2016 3:00:00 PM
** If there were any SSOs or TFOs that are not listed above, please contact the DNR and stop work on this section until
corrected.
Nhat actions were taken, or are underway, to reduce or eliminate SSO or TFO occurences in the future?
Full containment and cleanup of the spill occurred. We are actively cleaning and televising new and existing sewers, and
continuing lift station inspections.
We are also inspecting and televising the sewer work performed by contractors.
5. Infiltration / Inflow (I/I)
5.1 Was infiltration/inflow (I/I) significant in your community last year?
0 Yes
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
• No
If Yes, please describe:
5.2 Has infiltration/inflow and resultant high flows affected performance or created problems in
your collection system, lift stations, or treatment plant at any time in the past year?
o Yes
* No
If Yes, please describe:
5.3
Explain any infiltration/inflow (I/I) changes this year from previous years:
Plant flows appear to be less affected by typical wet weather events compared to previous
years.
5.4
What is being done to address infiltration/inflow in your collection system?
Continued commitment to the CMOM program, stepping up our private sewer inspections.
Total Points Generated 0
Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100
Section Grade A
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting For:
6/16/2017 2016
Grading Summary
WPDES No: 0025038
SECTIONS LETTER GRADE
GRADE POINTS
WEIGHTING
FACTORS
SECTION
POINTS
Influent A
4
3
12
BOD/CBOD A
4
10
40
TSS A
4
5
20
Ammonia A
4
5
20
Phosphorus A
4
3
12
Biosolids A
4
5
20
Staffing/PM A
4
1
4
OpCert A
4
1
4
Financial A
4
1
4
Collection A
4
3
12
TOTALS
37
148
GRADE POINT AVERAGE (GPA) = 4.00
Notes:
A = Voluntary Range (Response Optional)
B = Voluntary Range (Response Optional)
C = Recommendation Range (Response Required)
D = Action Range (Response Required)
F = Action Range (Response Required)