HomeMy WebLinkAbout39. 16-96FEBRUARY 23, 2016 16-96 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED___5-1____LOST_______LAID OVER_______WITHDRAWN_______)
PURPOSE: APPROVE AMENDMENT TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF AN
ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTER SIGN WITHIN THE
UNIVERSAL BUSINESS PARK; 2340 STATE ROAD 44 (TACO
JOHN’S)
INITIATED BY: TACO JOHN’S RESTAURANT
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Denial
WHEREAS, the Common Council previously approved planned developments for
installation of ground and wall signage, meeting Zoning Ordinance and Universal
Business Park Covenants, as part of the drive-thru restaurant’s approved Conditional Use
Permit/Planned Development; and
WHEREAS, the owner requests approval to amend the previously approved
planned developments by allowing the installation of an electronic sign at 2340 State
Road 44; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission recommends denial of the amended planned
development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that the previously approved planned development for installation of ground and
wall signage; as noted above and per the attached is hereby amended to install an
electronic message center sign within the Universal Business Park, with the following
conditions:
1. No off-premise advertising messages permitted;
2. No flashing, scrolling or animated messages. Messages and non-text images shall
not change appearance more than once every 60 seconds and transitions
messages shall be instantaneous;
3. Signage includes photosensitive equipment which automatically adjusts the
brightness and contrast in direct relation to ambient outdoor illumination; and
4. Colors and images must not imitate or be able to be confused as a traffic control
device.
OMEMORANDUM
K H
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Burich
Director of Planning Services
DATE: February 18, 2016
RE: Approve Amendment to Previously Approved Planned Development for
Installation of an Electronic Message Center Sign within the Universal Business
Park; 2340 State Road 44 (Taco John's) (Plan Commission Recommends
Denial)
BACKGROUND
The subject 1.54 acre property is located at 2340 State Road 44 within the Universal
Business Park approximately 0.5 miles southwest of US Highway 41. The existing use on
the site is a drive-thru restaurant, which was required to receive a Land Use Compatibility
Review with other uses in the area, a Conditional Use Permit for the drive-thru business and
Planned Development approval for the site design and layout, all of which were granted on
October 28, 2014 (Resolution 14-469).
Ground and wall signage (one wall and one ground sign), meeting Zoning Ordinance and
Universal Business Park Covenants, was approved as part of the Conditional Use
PermiUPlanned Development. The approved signage consisted of one internally illuminated
individual letter style wall sign and a single double-faced 10 foot tall monument sign totaling
50 square feet in sign face per side.
After approval of the development by Council in 2014 the property owner secured a sign
permit for the ground sign that was different from what was approved in Resolution 14-469.
The sign that was permitted included a bulletin board style message center but what was
actually installed was an electronic message center sign (EMC). Because an EMC was not
originally considered, the applicant must now seek an amendment to the Planned
Development. A different sign permit is also required but staff is unable to issue that permit
until an amendment is approved.
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is proposing an amendment to the planned development to allow a 25 square
foot digital electronic message center (EMC) sign. The M-3 General Industrial Zoning District
permits the use of EMC signage with a maximum of 50 square feet per side which would
make it in compliance with underlying zoning standards and the base standard modification is
necessary solely based on the prohibition of EMC signage within the covenants of the
Universal Business Park. The signage is appropriate for its use, compatible with other
signage in the business park fronting STH 44, and the EMC is appropriate for the commercial
highway setting. The petitioner requested a covenant variance from the Greater Oshkosh
Economic Development Corporation (GOEDC) who supported the request as it did not violate
their review standards and providing it complied with the City's recommended conditions for
EMC signage based on the draft zoning ordinance update.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no significant fiscal impact of approving or denying an electronic message center
sign at the subject property.
The Plan Commission did not support the planned development amendment at its February
16, 2016 meeting on a 43 vote. Part of the rationale for not supporting the amendment was
that the EMC feature of the sign was not part of the original planned development and CUP
review, and that it should not be approved after the actual installation. Others on the
Commission felt that the amendment did not meet the intent of the business park covenants,
although that is not within the purview of the Commission in this case.
R/e�/pectfully Submitted,
'^� ��"'�Ya / �"U�f/�1
Darryn Burich
Diredor of Planning Services
Approved,
��
Mark Rohloff
City Manager
ITEM: DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF AN
ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTER SIGN VVITHIN THE UNIVERSAL
BUSINESS PARK AT 2340 STATE ROAD 44 (TACO JOHN'S RESTAURAN'll
Plan Commission meeting of February 16, 2016
GENERALINFORMATION
Applicant: Taco John's Restaurant
Owner: Jeffrey S. Rogge
Actions Requested:
The petitioner requests approval of a Planned Development amendmen[ to allow the installation of
an electronic message center (EMC) willvn the frame of an existing monument sign loca[ed within
the Universal Business Pazk It should be noted that the EMC has been installed.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
By Uoiversal Busioess Pazk Covenants, electronic message center signage is not permitted within
[he Universal Business Park and which enforcement of the covenants has been collabora[ion
beriveen fortnerly the Oshkosh Commercia] Development Corporation (OCDC) and now the
Greater Oshkosh Economic Development Corporation. The subject property is also governed by a
Planned Developmen[ Overlay District, requiring Development Plan approval for improvements
and allowing base standard modifications to the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance or the business
pazk covenants.
Cri[eda and guidelines for the establishment and/or amendment of a PD Overlay District are ]ocated
in Section 30-33 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Type:
The subject 1.54 acre proper[y is bcated at 2340 State Road 44 within [he Universal Business Pazk
approximately 0.5 miles southwest of US Highway 41. The existing use on the site is a drive-[hru
restaurant, which was required to receive a Land Use Compa6biliTy Review with other uses in the
area, a Conditional Use Pertnit for the drive-thru business and Planned Developmen[ approva] for
the site design and layou[, al] of which weie gan[eA on October 28, 2014 (Resolution 14-469).
West of US Highway 41, State Road 44 is dominated by M-3 Genera] Industrial and G2 General
Commercial District zoning designations. These zoning designations, coupled with industrial and
business pazk covenan[s have guided growth to lazger industrial based and commemial office uses
in ciTy created industrial and business pazks. The subject parcel lies on the northem ex[reme of [he
Universal Business Pazk and is partially suttowded by the Southwest Industrial Pazk to the north
and east. The uses direcdy adjacent to the subject parcel are predominantly industdal and
commercial office. The Sou[hwest Industrial Pazk dominates the north side of State Road 44, and
the Universal Business Pazk on the south side. The uses along Hwy 44 aze varied in size, style and
azchitecture. Along the comdor thece aze gas stations, warehouse/distribution facilities, offices,
re[ail/wholesale stores, landscaping businesses, financial institutions, multi-family �esidences, child
caze facilities and vacant pioperties.
1TEM: 2340 Smte Road A4_PD Amend Signnge l
Site:
the Ciry of Oshkosh Universal Business Park I M3 PD
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
10 Yeaz Land Use Recommendation
20 Year La�d Use Recommendation
ANALYSIS
Land (Ise
Industrial
Ground and wall signage, meeting Zoning Ordinance and Universal Business Pazk Covenants, was
approved as part of the drive-thru restauranYs approved Conditional Use PermiUPla�ned
Development. Wall signage consists of one wall sign: an intemally illwninated individual le[tec
style wal] sign, located on the frontlsouth fagade. A second wall sign, a&anchise logo wall sign on
the east faqade was requested but not approved as it conflicted with the covenants. Ground signage
apprwed for the site met the regulations of the Ciry Zoning Oidinance as well as the standards of
the Ucuversal Business Park covenants and restrictions and took the form of a single double-faced
10 foot tall monument sign totaling 50 squaze feet in sign face per side Q 00 square feet rotal fo�
both sides).
With this Planned Developmen[ Amendment request, [he petilioner proposes a 25 squaze foot (50
squaze foot tota] for both sides) digital elec[ronic message center (EMC) sign. The petitioner states
in theu application that the inclusion of the EMC will not have a negative effect ou [he area as the
bcation is a state tnuilc highway and [hat other business in the azea also contain EMC as part of
[heir signage.
When analyzing the request, CiTy staff first consulted the Ciry Zoning Ordinance regula[ions in
tegazd to allowable EMC signage witlun the base M-3 General Industrial Zoning District. The M3
district permits the use of EMC signage ro the extent of a maYimum of 50 square teet per side (100
squaze feet total fo� all sides), so the request is in compliance with undedying zoning and the base
standazd modification is necessary solely based on the prohibition of EMC signage within the
covenants of the Universal Business Pazk.
Staff also reviewed the sign in regard to its consistency with other signage in the azea. T'his wil] be
the second EMC in the azeajoining an exisfing EMC at Verve Credit Union (2900 Univecsal Sa�eet
/TE,N: 23d0 Smre Road 4J PD Amend Sigmge 2
across STH 44 at the southeast comer of STH 44 a�d Universal Street) and the gasoline pricing
signage of Kwik Tdp and Shell service stations (at [he Highway 41-Frontage Road/ STH 44
interchange). Staff believes that [he extent of signage for the subject sites is appiopriate f'or its use,
compatible wi[h other signage in the business pazk fron[ing STH 44, a�d the electronic message
centec is reasonable and appropriate for the commeccial highway setting. Additionally, the
proposed signage azea meets zoning and is not excessive in size for a ge�eral commercial/industrial
setting and the sign itself is a qualiTy design and modem style suitable for the commercial corridor.
To address the covenants prohibi[ion of the business pazk covenau[s, the petitioner appioached the
Greater Oshkosh Ec000mic DeveLopme�t Corporation (GOPDC) Board and requested a covenant
variance to approve the proposed pexma�en[ electronic message center. GOEDC staff
recommended app�oval of the inclusion of the EMC sign at this location because it felt it did not
violate theii review standazd that
"No building or sign shall be permitted to be sited on the properry in a manner
which would unneressarily deshoy rn substantrally damage the natura[ beaury
and aesthetics of the area, particularly insofar as it would adverse/y affect values
rncident to ownership ojland rn that area; or which would unnecessarr[y have an
adverse effect on the beaury and general enjoyment of existing s7ructures on
adjoining praperties"
The GOEDC Board supported allowing a mo¢wneut sign with electronic message board with the
inclusion of City staff recommended co�di[ions (based on the draft zoning ordinance update)
including tha[ the EMC not advertise off-premise activities or businesses; that i[ not flash, scroll oc
be animated; that its light intensity adjust in relation to ambient lighting; and tha[ its colors and
images not imitate/be confused as a traffic coatrol device.
Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan amendment for installa[ion of an electronic
message ce�ter sign within [he U�iversal Business Pazk with the following conditions:
1. No off-premise advertising messages permitted;
2. No flashing, scrolling or animated messages. Messages and nomtext images shall not
change appeazance more than once every 60 seconds and transitions messages shall be
instantaneous;
3. Signage includes photosensitive equipment which automatically adjusts the brightness and
contrast in direct relation to ambient outdoor illumination; and
4. Colors and images must not imitate or be able to be confused as a izaffic cootrol device.
The Plan Commission approved of the developmen[ plan amendment as reques[ed with conditions
noted. The following is the Pla� Commissiods discussion on this item.
Mr. B�ck presented the item and reviewed the site and sunounding azea as well as the land use and
zoning classifications in [his area. He discussed tha[ the amendment [o the planned development [o
allow for the installation of an EMC sign that has al�eady been installed on the site. He reviewed
the layout of [he subject site and explained that the EMC was not allowed d�e to the private
cove�ants enforced in the Universal Business Park He explained that the owner had received
approval for the land use compatibility to allow the construction of the restaurant use in the
Universal Business Pazk and the planned developme�t approval. He discussed the other uses along
l7EM' 2340 Smre Road 4a_PD Amend Slgrwge
State Road 44 and reviewed the signage that was approved for [he site when the planned
development was approved and the sign that was installed. The sign that was approved contained
changeable copy only and met [he size requirements of the zoning code howeve� the EMC portion
of the sig� was not approved. He reviewed other signs in [he azea for consistency with this sign and
photos of these signs however they were not located within the business pazk o[her tha� the Verve
Credit Union sign. He stated that the sign was appropriate for the use and meets zoning code
standuds aud matches the building's exterior. He fw[her stated tha[ GO-EDC staff reviewed and
recommended approval of the EMC sign and reviewed the conditions recommended for this �
request.
Mr. Borsuk questioned what the purpose of the business pazk covenants were, if Verve Credit
Union had permission [o install their EMC sign, and if Taco 7olu�'s was aware of the wnditions foc
putting up the sign or the business pazk covenants.
Mr. Buck explained that the purpose of the covenan[s was ro create street presence and curb appeal
and consis[ency with site development througl�out the business park.
Mr. Burich added that developments within the pazk were to crea[e a certain feel or appearance and
pro[ect the investrnent of other property owners similaz to covenants created within new
subdivisions.
Mr. Buck s[a[ed that he assumed that Taco John's was not aware of the covenants that would not
allow the EMC sign to be installed.
Mc Burich stated [hat he was not sure how the EMC sign was approved a[ the Verve Credit Union
site however a building permit was issued bu[ it was no[ clear how Ihe EMC was overlooked. He
explained how the enforcement of the business pazk covenants used to be enforced by OCDC or
Chamco a�d there appazen[ly was some confusion regazding this when the permit was issued. The
City has since taken responsibiliry for enforcing the cove�ants however [he Verve sign did meet the
zoning oidinauce s[andazds and whomever issued the permit was most likely not awaze of the
business park covenants which aze separate and dis[inct from the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Thoms questioned where the breakdown happened and that [he sign definition was in the
original planned development and [he sign approved was not an EMC. He inquired if Taco John's
was not aware of the fact that the EMC portion of the sign was not included as part of the approval.
Mr. Buck stated [ha[ the building permi[ issued did no[ have the EMC portion of the sign included
and it was apparently changed after the permi[ was issued but may not have been in[entional.
Mc Thoms felt that the business pazk covenants should have been made cleaz to the Commission
when the plaru�ed development was approved and ii should have been discussed.
Mr. Burich added that the sign was compliant with [he business pazk covena�ts when reviewed by
the Plan Commission and approved by the Common Council and nothing included in the planned
development to allow for the EMC signage. He further discussed the wall sign that was denied by
the Council which was included in the original planned development but not allowed by the
business park covenac�ts.
Mr. Gray commented that'Iaco ]ohn's disregarded the covenants whe� the sign was installed and
what would prevent other developers from doing the same [hing as far as receiving approval for a
planned development and proceeding wi[hout adhering to the conditions and asking for approva] of
/7EM: 13J0 S(ate Road 44_PD Amend Slgrrage p
the altemate plaos at a la[ei date. He felt there was no accountability in this process if the sign is
approved at this point.
Mr. Burich discussed tha[ this has happened in the past and covenant issues have come up before as
well a�d GO-EDC has bee� dealing wi[h [he covenants most recently. It has been a s[ruggle ro
decide how to deal wi[h the covenant issues aud if GO-EDC or the ciry should deal with i[ and how
i[ should be handled for future requests.
Mr. Buck commented that the Commission should consider whether this is a reasonable request to
have the EMC and not the fact that it was already installed.
Mc Giay stated that [he Common Council recendy approved a triple permit fee foc wo�k completed
without a pennit and questioned if this would apply in this case as he felt there should be some type
of penalty for not compleling the project as approved.
Mr. B�rich responded [hat the triple fee for work being completed without a building permit which
is similaz to the Inspection Services fee schedule was approved and it was aimed at dealing with
situations where people have done work without obtaini�g Ihe appropriate building permits.
Ms. Lohry commented that Taco John's was not allowed to have the EMC due [o the business pazk
covenan[s and that the res[aurant es[ablishment was also not allowed in this azea without approval
of land use compatibiliry and the regular signage used by this franchise was also not allowed.
However she did feel that the EMC sign was appropdate for the use and she would support this
request.
Mr. Burich reviewed the Universal Busi�ess Pazk azea on the map and the covenants in place tha[
cover these areas and that the uses need ro be determined to be harmonious and compa[ible. He
discussed the history of the business pazk sta[us and standards in this area as well as in the
Southwest Industrial Pazk and Northwest Industdal Pazk and how [hese parks have differing
standards in different areas of the pazk and the difficulry with dealing with these factors.
Mr. Bowen discussed that the owner had applied for a sign permit and also went ttuough the
process of the approval of the planned development and appeared to have applied foc o�e thing aod
b�ilt a�other. He felt although the sign may be apptopriate for the use it is a sign permit viola[ion
and a violation of the approved planned development and notjust a violation of the business pazk
covenants. -
Tom Scharpf, 1621 Maricopa Drive, stated that he sold the property to the current owner and that
the owuer was unable to attend the meeting today.
Mr. Borsuk inquired why the sign was installed without the authority to do so.
Mr. Scharpf responded that he was not involved with the building permit process but that he owns
[hree ofSce buildings to the west of the subject site and from an aestheric staod point; he did not see
an issue with the EMC si�n.
Mr. Borsuk commented [hat he appreciated what [he city is trying to do in this case and tha[ the
adjacent property owner does not have issues with the request, however the real issue is wi[h this
use and this propeRy owner and [hat it was not a good project from the beginning. He felt [he
owner had a total disregard for the rules and regulations and that the Ciry would be setting a
precedent by allowing developers to do things o[her than what was approved and that he would not
support this request.
fT£M� 2340 Smre Road 44_PD Amend Sigrwge 5
Mr. Thoms agreed that it was a violation of the permit and planned development approval a�d [hat
he did not agree with what was done as i[ appeazed [hat the owner felt it was easier to ask for
forgiveness rather than pennission as he constructed something that was not wha[ was approved.
However he did not see any major issue with the change as it is aesthetically appealing and
discussed the holes in the process when it came to unde�standing and enforcing the private
covenants in the business park and he did not feel it was tha[ it was that egregious.
Mr. Bowen commen[ed that he did not see the EMC as an overly objectionable iequest as it seemed
appropriate for the area however he felt there should be consequences for constructing the sign
other than as it was approved. He further discussed the approva] process and the developets need
to follow it and felt the Ciry had to Itave teeth in what they approve and would like [o see the City
find a way to fine the property owner for what has occurred as some [ype of consequence for not
construc[ing the sign as approved.
Mr. Borsuk questioned if i[ would make any difference if the property owner was present.
Mr. Thoms commented [ha[ he would like to hear what [he owner had to say regazding [he matter
and wo�ld like some clazity ou why flus occurred. He furthec commen[ed that it wo�ld have
probably been approved as part of the planned development if requested and discussed if the request
should be laid over until the owne� could be present which he did not feel was necessary.
Ms. Lohry stated she would support the request to allow the EMC sign because she felt the sign was
attractive and seemed appropriate in the azea.
Mr. Gray stated that he did no[ fee] [hat it was necessary to lay the item over for the propeRy owner
to be present as he did not feel that the ownei would admit if it was an error or if it was done
intentionally.
Mr. Cummings commen[ed that this is not the fi�s[ time that this type of situation has occurred as
tar as a developer doing some[hing other than what received approval and we should not make
exceptions for this rype of action. He stated he would not support this request.
Mc Thoms inquired if the triple permit fee would apply in this case.
Ivu. Burich respo�ded that the triple permit fee is not effec[ive until Mazch 1".
Motion by Thoms to approve the development plan amendment for installation of an
electronic message center sign withrn �he Universal Business Pmk jor properry located at
2340 State Road 44 with the jadlowing conditlons:
No ofJ-premise adver�isfng messages permiteed,�
NoJlashing, scrolling or anrmared messages. Messages and non-text images shall not
change appearance more lhan once every 60 seconds and transdtions messages shal! be
instantaneous;
Signage rncludes photasensitive equipment which automaticalTy adjusts 7he brightness and
contrast in direct relation ta ambient outdoor illumination,- and
Colors and images must not imita7e or be ab[e to be confused as a traffre control device.
Seconded by Bowen. Motion denied 3-4. (Ayes-Bowen/Thoms/Lohry. Nays-
Borsuk/Fojtik/Cumm ings/Gray.)
ITEM 1340 Smre Road 44_PD AmerW Siywge
Mc Schazpf questioned since this request was denied if Verve Credi[ Union would have to take
down their EMC as well.
Mr. Fojtik explaiued that the Commission is makiog a cecommendation to the Common Council
only and that the Verve sign is not an issue in this disc�ssion. The Council would review this
request at their meeting next week and make [he final decision.
/TEM� 23J0 Smte ftoad 44_PD AmendSignage
-� City of Oshkosh Application susM�r To:
� Dcp[. of Communiry Developma
� 0 Planned Development Review x =�scn�.�nA��.,P.o.Box,�3o
. � Oshkosh, Wisconsiu 54903-1130
��H ❑ Conditional Use Permit Review ^ pHO,.�: �9zo� z3e.5o59
ON TXE WATEP
'•PLEASB TYPE OR PRQi'1' pSING BLACK INK'•
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: % f{EO �
Da�e: ��=�!'t=
Petitioner'sAddress: �J$� 5��i"% �'r�..+y � CiTy: 6S/f,(�US/5L 5[ate�3r Zip:S�!�'O�
Telephone #: (`Jap ) 38S' Z %S� Fac: ( ) Other Contact # or EmaiL `I �30 - 3 ?9 ^ 57775 �
StaNS ofPeti4oner (Please Check): �I er � Representative ❑ Teum[ 0 Prospective Buyer
Pe4tioner's SignaNre (required): �,�./ Da[e: F�l y�/(e
�r��
(1WIUFA T1Ui`/1DMATi/1N
Oamer(s): �Tt�� I� tl942. Date: y��
Owner(s)Address:l7�? %�i�G/{YL1.� RL� City: OSft�lefF/ StateLcl� Zip:S�/4af
Telephone #: ( 9�) `%7$ - F77f Fa<: ( ) OtLu Contact # or Email: P, o66ES � S�iC'(=Le9.!<. N�+
Ownership StaNS (Please Check): ❑ Individual 0 Trust �PaMership ❑ Corpofation
Property Ownu Consent: (required)
By signanue hereoq UWe aclmowledge that City officials anNor employees may, iu [he perFolmauce of their fiwetions, enter npon the
property [o insput or gather o[her infoxma[ion nuessary to process ttis applicatlon. I also wdersfand that all meeting dates aze teu[ative
aud may be posiponed by the PI Services Ditision for incomplete submissioas or o[6er adminishative reuons.
Property Owner's SignaNre:��i.L.Q Date: �i' /b
AddresaQ.ocation ofProposed Projeck f%},� ,f r/rk-- ��✓� y�% PazcelNo.
ProposedPrqectType: E�pGfjG�J�� /�'JeSSi4Gt L'�.,,{.e�_
(,luren[UseofProperty: L`parp�M�•'�P'L /?L${�/1�e/T Zoning: jYj .'� p�
Land Uses Smromding Site: Narth:
Swth:
Eask
West:
•'Please note that a meeting notice will be maiied m all abutting property owuers regarding your request.
➢ Applicafiou (ees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
➢ Please refer to the fee schedWe far appropria[e fee FEE IS NON-REF[JNDABLE
For moro iuf'olmation please the Ciry's websi[e at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.u�CommuuiTy_DevelopmenUPlsming.htm
StaH DafeReNd'�"��fo
4
Briefly ezplain how the proposed conditlanal use/developmm[ plan will no[ have a negadve eKect on tLe issues below.
1: Health, safety, and general welfaze of occupants of smroundiug Iands. N� N�+4'�,..�,L ��•
�c.
A�GA^'i Sc'ST R I2F.fr,P-!� /3onX�; N�% /¢
(-�-f-�LffF n� /.s -estL I ��F'�sscr ' Sf o �
2. Pedestrian and vehiculaz circulation and safety. ���.,�vF_
?/'-M�C•'� t5S✓�S 7z MY K�/uw(�l-� `b- $��NS l�+�`1e- NcT GV✓na0 wY
�t!o SiD�tu.ttKS lN �TJfL�f1,`Z W� /Fi� ON/F S'7J� �jHu.Fy', �J�, �'Q6�
3. Noise, air, aa[er, or oNer foxms af enviroumenfal pollution. "�� ���"
�.�C."f'f ii.E' �/v/�.L
�. i.uaraaer au¢ mnue ¢eve�opmem oc me ares.
IJa�N-3o�L� i3�sr4,�sss r.�=[��+.•.�.� VeRV� �-stF_v: f— u,.,.•�..� �ce,emss
�7l e.,,n__-r-.L.. ., oi�G.,... ,..._...._ n_._.n S S«.�o �f*iP.+c'f �Ste
� .�'w�JAtT
Must accompany the application to be complete.
ANARRAT[VE of Ihe proposed condiliom] use/Development Plan inclnding:
❑ Ecistingandproposeduseoftheproperly
❑ Identi5cation of all struclures (including paving, siguage, etc.) on the property and discussion of [he'u relation to We project
❑ Projecfed number of residenis, employees, and/or daily cus[omers
❑ Proposed emount of dwelling units, floor area, landscepe area, and parking azea ezpressed in square fee[ and acmage to the
nearest ove-hundredt6 of an acre
❑ Effects on adjoining properiies to include: noise, hours of operatioq glare, odor, fumes, vibratio¢, e[c.
❑ Compatibility of the proposed use wi[h adjacent a¢d other properties in the area. -
❑ Traffic generation (anficipated number of cus[omers, detiveries, employee shift changw, e[c.)
❑ Any other pertineut information [o propaly understand Ihe intended use/plan and i4 relatio¢ [o neazby properties and the
community as a whole '
Acomple[eSITEPL,9NandBI/lLDINGEL&VATTONSmus[include: �
O Two (2) full size (minimum 24" x 36') scaled and dimensioned pnnts of site plau aud buildi¢g elevatlons
❑ 7wo (2) 8'/x° x 11 (minimum) to 11" x 17" (mzcimum) reduc6on of Ihe site plan and building elevadoas
❑ One compact dise or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the projwt in AutoCAD 2000 folmat with fonts end plot style
table Sle (if plaos have been prepared digitally)
❑ TiUe block tha[ provides all contact informaROn for the pefiROUer and/or owner and contact infoemalion of pe¢tioner's
eugineers/surveyors/architects, or othu desig¢ professionels used in the preparation of the plaas
❑ The date of [6e onginal plan and revision dates, if applicable
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale.
❑ AIl propexty lines and existing and proposed righhof-way lines with dimensions clearly 1sUeled
❑ All required se[back and offset lines
❑ All er.isting and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building enhauces, walks, drives, signs, decks, paeos,
fences, walls, etc.
❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas end the design and materials used for screening
❑ Locaeon and dimension of all on-site pazking (end off-site pazldng provisioas if they aze to be employed), including a summary
of the uumber ofpazldng stalls provided per the requirements of Section 303fi City of Oshkosh Zoniug Ordinance
❑ I.ocation aud dimension of all loading and service azeas
❑ LocaROn, height, desigq illumination power and oriwfation of all exterior lighting on the proper[y iucluding a photome4ics plan
❑ Loca¢on of all ex[erior muhanical equipmen[ and utilities and elevatioas of proposed screeni¢g devices where applicable (i.e.
visible from a public street or residential use or disnict). Mechatica] equipment includes, bu[ is no[ limi[ed tn; HVAC �
eqmpmen[, electrical4ausfolmers and boxu, erz6aus[ flues, plumbing ve¢GS, gas regula[ors, generators, etc.
5
� .Y
��
r
'"+�
IT �
i
� � _
I , �
:+�
I
, � �,.
�'' {��
,�� -�•.
� �
i �
4�'
,' ��
� � �
i
u
�
r� �
� �
�� I
�
- EXI5TI1�� QRAIfSAGE??? i
�
�
� � ' I
i
I
I{'�r
�
��J
��
� �[
)
' 24'—�„
QRIVE
—� —�,�
��
��
.py
!C; f�
��• ���
.�
*~ �
,�
L
1
Y1�
�
iF� � .
ii
T,�Q.
w����
.,
��
��G��`�
n�,
�,�
.. ,
��
.��� ��
Y����
.'��'
y^+��
' ����
�
f�
r�
\
�
r�idw3a o� d�aa�
�dvasaNV� �n��s�x�
�
�
�+
��,� � ����
'-�" 4�+ �
q � � �--�ra�d�.l 3�i�
y � s�,_ �i�tl8135 43Wf1S5�
C7 �'{'
� � lJ
r�
�
,���
� � �
� _ �
� � �
��
\.,��� 0���: ���
1� � . '►�
�`
i- , .�. ., ,!�
��� i�;
� �� �—
ili��p �i
J�
�0� •� Z ,
S
I!'I� O
=i, b
� �,� a ��
�i�l F' @4
Jl� �, �A, /,� /J f
`VY VV . 2
�i�sdwRQ � . '
1 �
_r �
r.
1
� � 2
Y
U
4
�
l
� ��
� s�
� �
011b'c! "
. � .
� �
..
K��.�
r�.
�:'��
.�� v
:��"�
���
.� J
.:�
,��� v
r�■��
�T�•
� . � �. �?1U1Y �
���y �.��� LflCATION � �
� � �„Ql—,9Ll,�-
o g��6 �
= '
6 �
- ` N
� ��
3 w `� z
H rQ 6 �
O ❑ y
00
o ,o
�j�o
C r �
,3 e
Q w �
C Z (']
�' � W
� •0 � LL
7C � w cU
�+ o. U � E
� � � C W U
S � � IYI K A� C
y � L � m t
L T O O
0� p o W n
�' p � ��a�
� N Z ��� �
� � � �°md
s � a
n��
�
' � �
� �
q
�1
�
�
�
F
z
0
z
C�i
� .
o a ? �
�€ �_c
oo�
� ' � -_
o°�=3a
a o
tib��-v
� � � _
c° v a o n
U p p � O
arnm`oo�
����m�
� = ? F
m O a u Q O
`y � 0 . u
N � V "p N
L �'p^ � Q
`p � � Q L G
w a r � 3�
ac„m
y, a a a $�
> � Q Q 6 �
? E O � Q [
°1—`—aa�
c � m E U r°,
— o .
o ° m� c � .
q � m
aflLO�`oc
a � c � N o
tl V� q 0 0 �
] L
m � v � �
Vi��P=40
3ov�pm�
oa_n�2n
p a c 6"�` '" O
�➢ � 4 �'O 0.
r ov=jOU�
��
� a M y �
d " G
C u Q -° _ �O q_
orti o� �u=
b �
� L � N � � � � � �
a� _ O p � � p _a �
=a�
� E � o o L —
a �❑m���-
a�
° - 'u ° w ° ° � � t
z°qua`o=�n�.mun
i �
����' ..,'� '. r r .— .
� i��
,xi'•„ '! �`� � ..
i
�� [I �lr
�. I�'? ,. M� 1 T�.,,'� ' e]�' . yrl
,t �
. --; ' �' � i I • I �. i' ( � .
� r � i , � �
�i �
- , .. i!: �_-
'��' 'Ii�{��`���1,Y�
'�.i jll i �i: i �
l .lil� 5
'�' I�,�u't
�
.�
�
�
�
� L.
� �
�
1 �
I � i �
, i ,' �' i�. �:
�' ' I •lT�ll� �
I I
I r1 ��� dfl�s1�I��,.El�'- �
.�� F ��LFf��FI '��
� ��'.
l ,.. ' ' �
Ty�(.�• ��,r
' ; __ "�s � .. -
"'v � ; � y.r 3
r ��" �, ., '�'. ,� ..�',o.
y
.,� �A.�" l��,t�
d, i�y ti �
" �' ' �t.yq • i
. _ ..,�R. �."^r�,r,"±:�!`-,a ti?'� i _
0
�
v
�
�
C�0
cxi
ta �
� �
� N O
y � �� �
� N Q7 m Oi
w �
X C3. ln C C��
� � -.7 Q- V�S � 'ca
N� N N N y�
� � Q� 0 o N
�
.0 .N Q P 7 Q �
p 3 N L U_ � t'
"O Vj � d7
G} � �C�� (6
. . b iJ > � � L
� � ul > � } J �
p � � (0 a � J 'CS
C9� C,O� �
t6 01 O O .N,
wE a7�NUJ
�� 7 � � C .0 C ,C
N C U U � � � 'p
0- ��6 N N 7 RS C
u'1,��t�U-CS ro
�
�-� �
� ��
� �
N
� � �
�- y e
i� �[ � "
� � �
� V � �
� y �
�
�
�
T
�
��
�
�
'�
_�
�
�
� F
�P o
t o
� o
6�
� �
°mv
e�
aa
� .� �
Q a ,°_c
d � � �
� a
Z
� �
� . a
� o �
W € $'
Z � r�
a � �a
Q � ��
� � �.�
� a` g�
Z ��d
��
o� ��
° � ��
� < a:
a`
z'�
� ��e
� � cn -�
d
�
Jr�i4� ;r��J � !.���r���� �a�ts
The Ciry afi Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps antl da(a for its own use. 7hey may show the
approxirnate relative locabon of property, boundades and other feature from a variety of sources.
These map[s}ldatasets are pratided for information purposes oi�Sy and rnay not �e sufficient or
appropriate for Iegaf, e�gineering, or surveying purpases. They are provided "AS-IS' wilhouk
warranties of any ki�d antl Ihe City pf pshkosh assumes no liabiliiy for use or misuse.
� 1 in=a,l3mi
1 in = 7{�0 ft
Pr�nting Date: 10f1612D14
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
�
��� �fl
rlN rRe wt,irq
�,rusersMOenxwpFuata7noamingtmfcrosotnvvinaovrst5tan menulr�rogramst5tartup�ben �.niza User. benk
10
PD AMENDMENT-EMC SIGN HUCKLEBERRY ZNVESTMENTS LLC OFFICE P��K DEVELOPMENT LLC
2340 STATE RD 44 2331 ENT�RPRISE DR PQ BOX 2216
PC: 02-16-16 flSHKOSH WI 5A9fl4-6320 OSHKOSH WI 549fl3-2216
ALEX MADISON LLC
980 AMERICAN DR
N��NAH WT 54956-1363
CZTY OF OSHKOSH
PO BOX 1130
dSHKOSH WI 549�3-1I30
FIFTH AVENUE LLC
2515 GASLIGHT CT
OSHKOSH WI 5490A-73Q9
DISCOVERY PRQPERTI�S LLC
230 OHIO ST STE 200
OSHKOSH WI 549Q2-5825
GERALD P/SUSAN A BEKNDT
1264 C�UNTY ROAD FF
OSHKOSH WI 54904�6812
WINNEBAGO HOME B�ILDERS
ASSOCIATIQN INC
4091 STATE ROAD 91 1
05HKOSH WI 5490q-9218
BCG PROP�RTIES LLC
3076 ROSEWOQ� LN
OSHKpSH WI 54904-7613
H�Y 44 B�SINESS P�ACE LZC
PO BOX 2�16
OSHKOSH WI 549D3-2216
PdINTE rnAX & FINANCIAL LLC
2515 GASLIGHT CT
05HKOSH WZ 54904-7309
PROVIDENT PROPERTIES LLC
2391 ENTERPRISE DR
aSHKOSH WI 54909-�32Q
RLR INVESTMENTS LLC
600 GILLAM RD
WILMINGTON QH 45177-9089
TJR ON 44 LLC
I78 ALDER AVE
O�RO �T 54963-2014
C E S A 6 SPRINT �pWARDS PROPERTIES dSHKOSH OFFICE PARK
2935 UNIVERSAL CT LLC ASS�GZATES LLC
OSHKOSH WI 549D4-6324 1241 JACKSQN ST 5711 GREEN VALLEY Rp
OSHKOSH WI 54g01-375� OSHK�SH WI 54904-9700
MIDWEST REAL �STATE PCI UNIVERSAL STREET OF�ICE CE�TRAL WISCONSIN REALTY
DEVEL�PMENT CO INC LLC HOLDINGS LLC
2990 UNIVERSAL ST B 200 E WASHTN�TON ST STE 2A 484 SUNNYBRQOK DR
OSHKOSH WI 59904-5903 APP�ETON WI 54911-5450 O�HKOSH WI 549�9-7424
STATE ROAD 44 LLG
947 TRILLIUM TRL
OSHKOSH WI 54909-7671
JBOK ENT�RPRISES LLC
4509 N KNdLLW00D LN
APFLETdN WI 59913-7668
JEFF RQGGE
1757 BUEHRING RD
OSH�QSH �7r 54904
CITIZENSFIRST CREDIT U�ION THOMAS h' RUSCHJRTCHARD
PO BdX 30A6 GABERT
osxxosx wz 54903-3046 �a BpX 3808
OSHK�SH WT 549q3-3808
HCP nERMA�pLOGY ASSOC LLC
4890 W KENNEDY B�VD 65�
TAMPA FL 33609-2529
TACd JOHNS
2340 STAT� RaAD 44
OSHKflSH WI 54909
r '��I ,�° ► � �J �I��
)�-�� :�r��r� f,�,t-�
The Cify ot Qshkosh creafes and mainfains GI5 maps and data for its own use. They may show the
approximate releiive location of property, boundaries and other fealure from a var€ety af sources.
These naap(s}ldataseis are provided for information purposes only and may nof be su#�cient ar
approgriale for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Thay are provided "AS-IS° wifhoul
warranlies of any itind and the Ciry of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use ar misvse.
w
1 in = 0.�3 mi
1�n=15�ft
Printing �ate: 112�12016
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
�
rJ.IHK01H
ON THE WAiEA
J:1Ci15',PlannEngiPlan GommiSS�on SiEe I'lan Map TeRiple�elFEan Commfss[on Siie Plan Ma� Tcmplate,mxd User: debar2�� �
����� �-rr�:r� f;� -}-�
The Gity of Oshkosh creaies antl mai€�Eains GIS maps and data for its own �se. Thay may show lhe
appraximale relative �acation of property, bour�daries and olher feature from a variety af sources.
These map(s}ldatasets are providetl for in#armaiion purposes only and may not be su�icien4 or
appro�riate for legal, engiaeering, ar surveying purposes. They are provided "AS-IS" without
warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liabiliiy for use or misusz.
�
1in=0.19mi
1 in = 1,OOQ it
PrEnting Date: 1121I2016
Prepared by: City of Oshkash, WI
�.
o.r�Ka1H
aN ni� war�n
J:1GIS+PIanning�Pfan Comrtfiss€on Site Plan E41ap TemplatelFlan Cocnmission Sile Fdan Map Template.mxd User. debor�ji�
'i
, `� f
,Y� 1 �.j'� �:iy �/ /. y.�
. �' � �t � r r.. v�y� ,� ,i
. �� �', �'� � r � ��
' . {' �t' a i _ " �Y � i� £
'iR •� ��. °�',
� �. � - �.. R a� k -,�'
�� ����� .. A �
�: � � ` {�
� ��. VF'_. . +i y-{$�.� +:.1 ;. �. �� ` Y y.:�
sr�
' � ���y . ��,�^ � �' .. _ ,
��./j �P',l �� 4� ��'. ' �� , ��A" �
, ,e ' � �.
d ��,
r � f � �� ; � �� � �:
�lF�` � *� �'�' t
• 'x�F.. �., ,'�,g ..
� r,: " � . �
■ ` .:'���, ��• . �
, �r y r �'
'�' �' � ,� �' �u.
., � . �� � � , .
, ��� � � � ;�: � ��, �,
�"� �� ,� � � �
� ,k.F' '!t �1, I( �
� ! � � � j�, ' � ` ` � . 4 ��f�� �
. �;'�l � , "� �. „ti,� _
' '"' Y"' �
. � �
. . S` �S-
'� ,- ';� � : °� .� �'
�� � �, _. - ,�-.� �' � . :
'� :� ,��` -;: v- � �`r .
� . : ,, � �
� � ,� ` , -
,.:F---e , �,, ,s
�t �`� ,
; �s`.' � ' ,�' !'�" � _ �
� ! ` �
�' #�' ' i�� r��,+ '
� � :igx � ,
� -!r. . �. .5�'� �� '� iv,�
�
• � ,�
,
a .
;
; �..
n2 .� .. ,.�' °" � '.� � . � /� � l�,�4 9� k.:.
'. ;q�. � .. • �1r•� 6 � . . �.;'.
, `
• �
.. � �� �,..ya 3�: "�..... �� ' '"��
� ' �S. R :l"'v�, , . :4r ;�� � �.;r. . ' . . ��A�
.
� � ,� � ��`+�, 'a� � .. � �
,
' .i � 'r Y�� . .
�y� �
y� i �
M'i � '
.
"'�,�" � � ��?/ �,;:!� S � � _
�_.��M : A� � . _� � y�:� 1 �.
� �'.
�, � � . �
r �#, a
� ,,{ ��'• - • � ��� '�" ' � =!s
� �
�9�" � � f' � � � ��! � � ' ' I
_ �W�� � +!
=�- . , .
` . ��'°' � . «' y _
,� .� �., , „.'
��/f�' � � . ■ � ':�• � 3 _ �,_
f ♦" � � j `
� r
. �.
J�
�:J��J J �r��� I�J �t�� �� 1in=0.03mi �
� 1in=150ft
The Cit�,� of OsY7kc�sh r eat�s �r�u rr�alntalns GIS ma�U �r�u d�ta for its c�;n�r� ���� TY7ey� rnat� s??c��n�= the
approximate relative iocaiion of property, bounaaries ana other feature rrom a variety of sources. Printing Date: 1/21/2016 O f I--IKO f I--I
These map(s)/datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be suffcient or
appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purpcses. They are provided "AS-IS" without Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI ON THE WATER
warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse.
J:\GIS\Planning\Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template\Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template rr,o:i t;c :.;: