The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About27301 / 74-06� � CIIANGB ORDF.IL NO. � Ownes CitY of Oshkosh, Wisconsin p�i�� 10/9/7q Project Wastewater Treatment Facilities Conttact "u" Contractor Fluor Bros. Construction Co. , Inc. OriginalContractAward $ 4,537,707.00 Change Ordered Herewith: - - Extend Contract complet;on time from B00 consecutive calendar days after written notice to proceed to 983 consecutive calendar days . � after written notice to proceed. Reason for Change Order: To extend.contract time for causes outside of the control of Contractor per his request. (See Attachment). CONTRACCqMOUNT Original g9,537,707.00 � PreviousC.Os(ADD/� g 31.141.07 This C.O. (ADD/DEDUCT) $ -0- REVISED � $4,568,848.07 � CONTRACT TIME (CAL. DAYS) Original 800 Days Revious C.O.s (ADD/DEDUCT) No Chanqe Days 77tis C.O: (qDD/�') 1$ 3 Days REVISED 983 Days THIS UOCUMF,NT SHALL SECOME AN AMENDMENT TO THF, CONTRACT AND ALL STIPULATIONS AND COVENAN'PS OF 1'HE CONTRACT SHALL AI'PLY }�gRETO. Donohue & Associates, Inc. FLUOR BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO CITY OP' OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN BYr' i BY:�_et \r F )Q� i� E. Wm. McEnroe, Exec. V.P. 16 Date Donohue & Associates, Inc. Consulting and Design Engineers 2033 � 7 _, cunNCeoKOeiiNO. � �a7�cl Owner Citv of Oshkosh Wisconsin Datc 10/9/74 � Roject Wastewater Treatment Facilities Contract_ "a" ConVactor Fluor Bros. Construction Co. , Inc. � Original Contract Award $ 9, 537, 707.00 Change Ordered Herewith: Extend Contract completion time from 800 consecutive calendar days after written notice to proceed to 983 consecutive calendar days after written notice to proceed. � Reason fot Change Order: To extend contract time for causes outside of the control of Contractor per his request. (See Attachment). CONTRACT AMOiJN7' CONTRACT TIME (CAL. DAYS) Ori�nal $4,537,707.00 Original 800 Days Revious C.Os (ADD/jy��j(g}j g 31. 141. 07 Previous C.O.s (ADD/DEDUCT) No Chanae Days ThisC.O. (ADD/DEDUCT)S '�- ThisC.O: (ADD/�[') 183 Days REVISED $4,568,896.07 REVISED 983 Days THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BECOME AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT AND ALL STIPULATIONS AND COVENANTS OF THE CONTRACT SHALL APPLY HERETO. Donohue & Associates, Inc. FLUOR 9ROS'. CONSTRUCTION CO CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN Donohue & Accociates, Inc. By: . `l-LC' `� ��({� O Ff >� ete F. Po/ te .E. a e BY' I �`1 ° ( �7 i Wm. Enroe, Exec. V.P. Date By: ate ' � o�.,� � �[�„�ConsultingandDesignEngineerS� �� - --. _. 2033 / 7 .._ Vm� N.. n � u_ CONTRACT "A" City of Oshkosh, Wastewater Treatment Facilities Attachment to C. O. #7 DELAYS AFFECTING CRITICAL PATH OF PROJECT FOR WHICH EXTENSION OF TIME IS BEING GRANTED 1. Sewer Contractors delay under Contract "I" was to have been completed March 19, 1973. Actually completed June 14, 1973. . 87 days 2. Excess Rock Excavation Contract called for Contractor to include 1000 Cubic Yds. in Bid. Actually removed 1749 cubic yds. Required additional work, 18 days 3. Shortage of reinforcing steel for structural slabs. Records show severe drop i❑ delivery during ,7anuary and February of 1974. General Contractors agreement with his material sup- plier called for an additional $3.00 per cubic yard of concrete for concrete not supplied from unheated portable ready mix plant at site. Material supplier did not charge General Contractor this premium be- � cause he was unable to supply re-steel to enable pouring of concrete before cold weather. 60 days 9. Delays caused by other Contractors, excess rock excavation and delayed delivery of re- inforcing steel caused work to be done in severe winter weather thus reducing efficiency. 16 days 163 days Delays not on critical yath,these delays tended to compress the Mechanical and Electrical Contractors work schedule into a tighter time frame necessitating a larger crew and not being able to complete work as originally planned. 1. Jurisdictional dispute May 6, 1973 through June 8, 1973. May 6, 1973 through May 21, 1973 delay chargable to this dispute. Balance ran con-current with 18" underdrain line. Dispute arose between Plumbers and Laborers as to jurisdiction on ground water drainage system installation. 16 days 2. 1B" under drain line, draining floor drains, etc. to wetwell. Delays by Contractor for Contract "B" held up General Contractor in area between Aeration Tanks irom May 22, 1973 thrugh June 25, 1973. Actually more time was used by Contract "B" but it did not hold up Contract "A". 34 days 18" sludge drawoff lines for Final ql and #2. 7/22/73 and 7/23/73 Contractor "B" scheduled 25 days, Osed 27 days. 2 days Ground water problems on effluent lines from 4 final clarifiers. Excavation for installation of these lines unearthed springs. In order to seal oPf these spzings and preclude the necessity of the City of Oshkosh to pump out this ground water for the life of this project, additional work was requixed to seal off same. Finals #1 and #2 8/6/73 through 9/20/73 30 days (5 days scheduled, 35 days used) Final #3 and #4 11/1/73 through 12/18/73 32 days (15 days scheduled, 97 days usedj �� Novea6er 5, 1974 T0: OSHKOSH COFIPION COUPdCIL FROM: dOHN [d. PENCE City Attarney REF�RENCE TO: CkIANGE ORDER N0. 7 TO CONTRACT "A" ACID RESOLUTION NO 6 OF TAE OSFiKOSH COhP10N CO[IPICIL AGENDA FOR NOVEPffiER 7, 1974 The contractor, Fluor Bros., had submitted to our engineer a request for an extension of time pursuant to paragraph nu¢ber 36 of the contract between Fluor Bros. and [he Ci[y of Oshkosh. Paragraph No. 36 states in part as follows: 36. EXTENSIONS OF TIME A. Should the con[ractor be delayed in the iinal completion of the work by any act or neglect of the owner or engineer� or of any employee of either, or by any other con[ractor employed by the owner, or by strike, fire, or other cause outside oi the control of tl�e cont.-ac[or and which in the opinion of the engineer, could have been neither anticipated nor avoided then an extension of time suf£icien[ to compensate fo[ [he delay� as determined by the engineer� will be granted by the ownerg provided that the contractoz gives the owner and the engineer prompt mtice in writing of [he cause of delay in each case and demonstrates that he has used all reasona6le means to minimize the delay. Such notice nust be given by the coatractor to the owner within five (5) days following the be�inning of such delay. The contractor, in this instance� requested time ex[ensions from oux engineer. Our engineer reviewed tlie request of [he contrac[or and de[ermined tha[ as follows: � a � a �� l'� � � � �� r� 0 0 � � M �c+ti p o S 1 � r � d� T$ i M � �� o a� o� ? d O rnri �+ �da U i�jV� � O {� O w�— o0 z � � r a oioo � 3 e d o+�.+.p�L+ d � � o 0.' 3 K1 cl � � � S� OW 7 ri w wwa o m z� i ro N F M b %m t. N rn O -i a o W Y h0 Y C G m t'i E. N Y . o+�ro a N O i, d o ro .. WEW 4 O C S.E❑ E o w o 0 +a a� t, .a Y N W Y 7 3 N C r 1 N. Nl o o uma +i m m o E a> � 3 � o E �_ � 1 Fi ., a '.'' �I x � rn ri L� x S� u v � ti � V v .1 Y O �-I 2 U v n P � r d � � � O S J � o u