The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About28701 / 77-20�/. � �, p r , . ? � �� '�`�. � � . � lil�C.l, �� 1�ort� ��.C�� LG�I,,'6�19� ,��,ic�f� - .r MARCH 3, 1g77 # 2Q RESOLU�In�I _ __,� --..__ . .___ .__ __ _ _ 4 1LVi`1'1!�'1'ED BY: Gl`I'r 1'+1�N�i�rr:T-� PURPOSE: APPROVAL OF 1977 CAPITAL IMPHOVE1+IEPdTS YROGHAM BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council o#` the Cit� of Oshkosri that the 1977 Capital Improvements Pz�c�ram, City of Oshkosh, 5th Revisian dated February 28, 1977, is hereby approved. ?0� � �ry � ... . . . .� r1 � .. ... � ....... �. .. _........« .,..... .........:� .._,......-.. ..,.....,�,� iTl"�.KtY" ��•� T'�Y7 A. . + .. �...,« .....J .UJ. .:........„...e.......�.�..-...m,..,.. , �..,....�.w..,, ........... .. ; I � � � • � j �C 1, �.�....�,.�� ......................��,,.........m..»......_.-�..._,...� , 7 � f Q�� \\ ♦ -�� - T tl � �` -..-..,...:4�!.. � T \ " � �. ,y 1 J�i. . . M.l;_�^..� �...� 1�.�.,......r _� _«.. ....._...,., .�.......«.. ......__........ ...,..j�. . .w .............�.��{ i� J �� i;!' `� �i�"�(-!- P._ ��:i�_;=?C:1 �,V�N;!:= � P. p. E3px 7130 • 05HKOSH, WISCONSIN 54901 ,� -�'.:a.; �. �. � ' i'�.�� ' Date : Feburarv 2 8, 19 7 7 C':1':.�., .';�L George N. Singstock President Ken R. Schiefetbein Vice Presidant Wayne C. Chaney Don FI. Kutchera Robert H. Moser Kathl�en M. Propp Bernice Teichmiller ' _ _:; William D. Frueh From; City Manager To: Members of the City Council Policy Toward New Subdivisions At the City Council Workshop on Thi:irsday, February 24, 197'1, I expressed some deep-seated concerns towards the city's po- licy of providing money and services toward new subdivisions. I had previously expressed concern in this regard and the city staff has conducted some investigation into this matter by inventorying subdivision policies of c�ther cities. Generally speaking, the policy in most cities outside of P7isconsin is that the subdivider pays aIl costs for the engineering an,d construction of the project. This is not the policy generally in Wisconsin, however., An inventor'y was taken of 11 major Wisconsin cities and comparisons . with the policy in Oshkosh. Specifically, cor:lparisons made were made in 6 general policy areas. The areas are as follows: . l. Does the city provide engineering services? In Oshkosh, in accordance with the subc3ivision ordinance, the city designs all street and sewer, water, and storm se- wer improvements. In four of the 11 cities, a similar policy is pursued, and in 4 others, the city does not provide the service whatsoever. In the remaining 3 cities, the city pro- vides the service, but all, or a major portion.of the cost is recovered by the city. 2. Does the city provide access to special. assess- ment funding? In Oshkosh, all subdivision improvements are financed by the city's special assessment revolving fund. This �ractice ab- sorbs a great amount of the $2,365,Gu0 special assessment fund. Last year, the requirements for special ass�ssm�nts utilized $ggE,1.00 to accommodate new subdivisions. A similar policy was pursued in 6 of the 11 major cities, while the re- maining 5 cities did not allow access to its special assess- ment funding. Policy Toward New Subdivisions February 28, 1977 '— Paqe #2 3. What is the city's policy toward storm sewers? In Oshkosh, the city, in accordance with the subdivision ordi- nance, completely pays fbr all storm sewer costs in new sub- divisions. This cost is not assessed; and last year, in the 11 subdivisions which were platted and. financed, t�e cost of storm sewers was $234,173. In the 11 cities surveyed, 4 had - a policy similar to Oshkosh's--2 made the subdivider pay the entire cost; and 5 of the 11 cities had some arrangement �-:here the subdivider paid a significant part of the cost, 4, What is the policy toward streets? In Oshkosh, the entire cost of all street improvements are assessed. The grading and graveling of the street is first installed, and after the subdivision is started, concrete streets are installed which are entirely paid for by the subdivider, except if the street must be wider than 36 feet, at which time the city picks up the additional cost. In 8 of the 11 cities surveyed, the developer pays the entire cost, and in the remaining 3, the city pays some significant part of the overall cost. 5.. What is the policy toward sanitary sewers? In-Oshkosh, the city provides financing for sanitary sewers; however, it is all recovered through special assessments ex� cept for the sizes larger than 10" in diameter. This policy is generally the same as the other 11 cities, with 9 making the subdivider pay and in 2 cities, the city pays for the extra cost of over 8'� in diameter. 6. What is the policy toward water mains? Oshkosh's cost for new water mains is assessed and the city recovers the full cost, except for water mains deemed necessary �o be larger than 8" in diameter, This policy is generally followed in other Wiscor�sin cities, with 8 cities having the � developer pay, 2 require the city to pay for �•�ater mains lar^ ger than 8" in diameter, and 1 city picks up the excess costs when a water main costs �nore than $5,50 per foot. I had previously given the Council a chart outlining the city's and the individual policies thereof. It is especially appropriate that the City Council review the policy towards subdivisions at this time berause it is now necessary that the 1977 Capital Improvements Program be fi- nalized. Last year, 1976, the city financed 11 subdivisions, costing a total of $1,33$,420. Of this amount, $996,100 wi11 be recovered through special assessments, but $342,320 repre- sents the city's cost to accommodate these new subaivisions. Policy Toward New Subdivisions February 28, 1977 Page �3 The new subdivisions created 283 new lots or space for the construction of 355 new dwelling �inits. The city's invest- ment per lot created amounted to $1,210, At the present time, there are 6 subaiuisions requesting city financing. The 6 new subdivisions woul� create an additional 279 lots or space for 385 new dwelling nnits. In my opinion, the city's liberal policy toward new sub- divisions had created an over supply of new buildinc, lots. An inventory was taken of the number of new dwelling units, � and where they were constructed in 1975 and 1976. �he fi - gures of new buildings constructed in subdivisions platted since 1970 is as follows: Years 1975 1976 Single Family 81 of 108 63 of 100 Two Family 14 of 25 7 of 14 Multi Famil 7 of 10 4 of 9 It is apparent from the analysis of these figures that be - tween 74 and 102 new lots created each year are all that is needed accommodate the home building construc'�ion industry in Oshkosh. The problem which now requires a solution is how much funding shoulc� be provided in the up-coming general obligation bond issue to accommodate the subdivisions. The proposed 1977 Capital Improvements Program has been revised as a result of the Council Warkshop on February 24, and the subtotal for city purposes amounts to $1,995,000, assuming that no funding would be available to new subdivisions. The City Council has indicated that it would not be desirable to in- crease the bonded indebtedness of the city by more than ? 1/4- 2 1/2 million dollars, and therefore, a review of the subdivision policy and the su�di.visions currently before the city is appro- priate. The options available to the City Council are as follows: l. Continue to fund all new subdivisions with no restrictions as to �he amount of lots created, under the same policies as previously used. Under this option, the amounts needed in the capital improverrients general obligation bond issue would be as follows: Special Assessment Revolving Fund --- $52�,700 Storm Sewers 286,000 Water Mains 10,000 Policy Toward New Subdivisions February 28, i977 — — -- Page #4 Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding Required Unrecovered City Cost per Number of Lots Created Space for Dwelling Units Total General Obligation Capital Improvements Lot Created Bond for $ 10,000 902,100 1, 363 279 385 $2,897,100 2, Continue to have no limits on subdivisions, but change the assessment policy towards storm se�•:ers. Under this policy, the city would a?r�end its policy o� not charging any of the storm sewer costs to the r_e;�r subdivisions by assessing the full cost o� tne stcr:�: sewers on a per lot basis up to an amount of $10 �er front f:oot, Generally speaking, if the cost e�;c_��s $10 per front foot, that cost can be attributab�e ��o the storm sewer serving an area larcer than the tiTM=.�- diate area of the subdivision. Under this option, the costs are as follows: Special Assessment Revolving Fund -- Storm Sewer ' Water Mains Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding Required Unrecovered City Cost per Number of Lots Created Space for Dwelling Units Total Bonding Needed for ments Lot Created Capital 571�,800 81,000 10,000 10,000 902,100 667 279 385 Improve- 2,2°7,100 3. Under this option, the city would have a given a:-o �z� of money available for new subdivisions, and tney would be financed on a first come, first served ba=is-- based on the date that the preliminary plat ior tn2 subdivision is approved. Under this basis, a total of $546,500 would be available, and the following subdivisions would be approved for financing: Par'�- side, Kinney-Kruger, and the fourth addition to Westhaven. It would be proposec3 that the city's assessment policies would remain exactly the same. Under this option the statistics are as follocas: Special Assessment Revolving Fund -- Storm Sewers Water Mains Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding �equired Unrecovered City Cost per Lot $343,000 183,�OG �O,G00 10,000 546,�G0 1,I90 Policy Toward New Subdivis�ons February 28, 1977 Page #5 Nun�er of Lots Created S�ace for Dwelling Units Created Total Bonding for the Capital Improvements Program 171 171 $2,541,500 4. Under this option� the city would make the same total $546,500 available pn a first come, first serve basis, based on the date of the preliminary plat approval with a change in the policy towards the assessment of storm sewers as outlined in op- tion #2. Costs of this opticn are as follows: Special Assessment Revolving Fund �-- Storm Sewers Water Mains Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding Required Unrecovered City Costs per Lot Number of Lots Created Space for Dwelling Units Created Total General Obligation Bonding Required $467r800 58,, 700 10,.000 10,000 546,500 460 171 171 2,541�500 5. Under this option, the city would f�nd new subdivisions on the basis that a limited amount o� funds was avail- able, and the selection of the new subdivisions would be on the basis of the least city investment per .lot, assuming the continuation of the present policies of assessing storm sewer. Assuming $372,500�was avail- able, the following lots would be funded: Kinney- Kruger, Foreign Flair, Westbrook lst Addition, Park- side Addition, and Westway lst Addition. The cost per lot varies from $454 in the Kinney-Kruger sub� division to $1�371 in the lst Westway Addition. The 4th Addition to Westhaven would not be funded because it requires an unrecovered city investment of $1,391 per lot. On this basis, the costs are as follows: Special Assessment Revolving Fund -- Storm Sewer Water Mains Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding Required Unrecovered City Cost Per Lot Number of Lots Created Space for_ Dwelling Units Created Total General Obligation Bond Required $226,500 146,000 00 00 372,500 858 I70 276 2,367,500 Policy Toward New Subdivi:sions February 28, 1977 T Page #6 6. Under this option, the city would again fund sub� divisions on the basis of the least city investment per lot, and at the same time, amend the storm sew�r assessment policy so that al1 storm sewer costs are recovered up to $10.00 per front foot, as outlined in option #2. Under this basis, the unrecovered city cost per lot is as follows; Subdivision Kinney-Kruger Foreign Flair lst Addition to Westbrook 4th Addition to Westhaven lst Addition to Westway Parkside Addition Cost per Lot $ �� 59.00 556,00 603.00 639.0� A natural dividing line is apparent between the firs� addition to Westbrook and the 4th addition to Westhaven, therefore, I would suggest that the total bonding available be limited to $221,.0�0. Under this basis, the first three additions would be funded and the figures would be as follows: Special Assessment Revolving Fund -- $219,300 Storm Sewer 1,700 Water Mains Sanitary Sewers Total Bonding Required Unrecovered City Cost Per Number of Lots Created Space for Dwelling Units Total General Obligation Rec�uired Lot Created Bond � 221,000 15 112 � 218 2,215,000 I recommend that Option #6 be adopted because it furnishes space to accommodate a normal construction year and, coupled with the great amount of lots created in last year's program, there should be many options available to home builders to construct new homes. Therefore, the initial bond resolutions introduced at the next City Council Meeting on biarch 3, 1977, will reflect this recommendation. If you would rather adopt other options, we can easily amend the resolutions so that they contain different amounts. , I should also point out that discussing this with the City Coun- cil last Thursday night, I gave the impression that the developer of �r'estbrook Addition wants to extend the 30" sewer �nd 18" water main to the west side of his addition to accommodate the lst addition to Westbrook, This was not correct becau:>e tl�e lst addition to Westbrook does not necessitate the extension of these Policy Toward New Subdivisions February 28, 1g77 Page #7 utilities. �e subdivider wishes to plat an area on the west side of the property, which would require the extension of these utilities. Actually, the extension of the utilities, if desired by the City Council should be made a part of the regular Capital Improvements Program and if you want to do this, we should increase the special assessmei�t fund by $10,200, the sanitary sewer fund by $39,900 and the water main fund by $34,500. This investment does not have to be made in order to accammodate the lst Westbrook subdivision; however, again if the Council wants to include this improvement in the Capital Improvements Program, I can easily make the adjustment by amen� ding the resolution as introduced. If you approve o� Option #6, I would propose that we wauld have a proposed amendment to our subdivision ordinance for considera- tion, whict� would allow the city to assess the cost of storm sewers in new subdivisions, up to $10 per front foot. It is also recommended that the City Council also consider other aspects towards its policy of encouraging or not en- couraging new subdivisions. It is apparent that the present policy, providing the engineering and financing, will lead to an over-abundance of the supply of building lots in our city. This means that the public investment in_creating these building lots, might not be recovered for several years. Some suggested changes are as follows: . 1. The City Council might want to set a long range policy of making only an amount available in the Capital Improvements fund which would accommodate the desired number of lots to be created in the coming year on the most cost effective, efficiency basis (as recommended in Option #61, 2. The City Council might want to make the special assessment financing method of new subdivisions less desirable by increasing the interest rate and decreasing the payment period to subdividers. The suggested interest rate might be 12o paid back in 6 years in new subdivisions; at l0o interest rate paid in 10 years to general city special assess� ments; and a special assessment of 6o paid over 15 years for retired and/or handicapped persons. This would allow private financing sources to be more competitive with the city`s sources. 3. The city should�consider recovering the cost of engineering new subdivisions. As pointed out earlier in this report, the total investment in improvements to accommodate new subdivisions amounted to $1,338,420 in 1976. If these improvements had been engineered by a private engineerin� consultant, � Policy Toward New Subdi.yi�ions " Fekzruary 28, 1977 Page #8 3� Continued paid �or by the subdiv�dexs�, it pxobably would have cost $80,305 assum�nq a 6o eng�;neering fee4 This amounts to a cost of $2�4 per lot9 Perhaps the cit� sfiould revise the subdi,vision ord�nance so that thi:s cost of proviaing engineering work to new suF�dividers would be recaptured ,.. 1 would stress that having these policies does not necessaril.y restrict growth and progress in the city, Subdividers r,�rould still have the option of creating an unlimited amount of new buildinq lots, however� they would not have access to the city�s �i-� nancing mechanisms and the improvements would have to be made wholly without the support of city funds� I. hope and trust this report gives you the necessary basis to make a decision on the mattex this coming Thuxsday. I am en�- closing a copy o� the anal�rsis o� th.e cost o£ the 6 new sub� divisions whiciz have been approve.d� but are un�unded at�this time� If you have any questions in regard to this, or other matters� please feel free to contact me pr�or to Thursday night. cs Enclosure � Resp ctfully submitted. �j � /��u j� _/ , `�'-.- /C� -L�=G-�-G` Wi.11iam D. Fxueh City Manager � 7 , � JAMES L. BABB JR., asa, SREA, MAI 19 South 6th Street / Ft. Atkinson� Wisconsin 53538 January 31, 1977 Mr� Boyd A. Kraemer Director of Parks City of Oshkosh 215 Church Avenue Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901 Regarding: Fee Estimate 7 Parcels Sawyer Creek �datershed Park Dear Mr. Boyd: 0 At your request, I have been asked to submit an estimate on the cost to appraise seven. parcels of property in connection with development of the above captioned project. I submit that the cost to appraise the parcels in compliance with the requirements of the Department of Natural Resources and the "Agreement for Final Appraisal" would be $750 per parcel,or a total of $5,250. (The total fee would include the appraisal of the Sasler property, if an appraisal wou3�d be required, which would lower the average cost per appraisal to approximately $655 per parcel for eight parcels.) In the event that court preparation and testimony are required, the cost would be $20 per hour (the standard approved fee of the j�isconsin State Highway Department). My fee proposal is approximately $100 per parcel less than my average fee for the Wisconsin State Highway appraisals involving 15 to 20 parcels per contract. I estimate that the completion date of the appraisals would be 45 days from the date of receipt of approval of the "Agreement for Final Appraisal". I am enclosing a copy of my qualifications for your consideration. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting an estimate. Respectfully yours, James L. Babb, Jr. ASA, SREA, r1E1I aiser JLB/lal -, , .,>._ f{� . p ..., j.o�r� ^�� iitl� �t+y! 'Sy")a� � �� !4 �Eg � �uil '; , � ' � "?" �"1, �} � � � �A ,-, .. �. � i � l�i?F�,� � ._-�-.-T - � REE1L ESTATE ANALYST'S QUALIFICATIONS JA�fES L. BABB, JR.. ASA, SREA, MAI BIOGRAPHY: -Born in Logansport, Indiana, August 10, 1934 EDUCATIO:V - GENERAL: -Public elementary and high school,._1942-I954 -Indiana University, 1957-1962, B.S. Degree in Business Admini.strat�on with major in Real Estate Admin.istration EDL'CATIOV - PROFESSIONEIL: -Principles & Techniques Course - Society of Real Estate Appraisers -Right-of-Way, 36-hour Training Course - Indiana State Highway Cor�mission -Required Examination for Course I- American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers -Required Examination for Course Appraisers -Elective Examination for Course of Real Estate Appraisers -Elective Examination for Course Real Estate Appraisers -EZective Examination �or Course Rea1 Estate Appraisers II - American Institute of Real Estate III, Rural Properties - American Institute IV, Condemnation - American institute of VIII, Residential - American Institute of -Bert P.odgers School of Real Estate - Florida PROFESSIavAI. ORGANIZATIONS: -Indiana Real Estate Broker - License ��14264 - December, 1962 -Member, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers (MAI) -2�enber, Society of Real Estate Appraisers (SREA) Secretary, Irtc�iana Chapter 5, 1969 Vice President, Indiana Chapter 5, 1970 Director, Indiana Cha.pter 5, 1972 Presi.dent, Indiana Chapter 5, 1973-74 -National Association of Ttealtors -A�erican R�ght-of-Way Association (Cert�fied Instructor) -i�fember, Aiaerican Society of Appraisers (ASA) BUSItiESS CO�riECTIONS: -Indiana State Highway Commission, 1962-66 - Trainee; Staff Appraiser; Supezvising Keview �ppraiser -A.C. Moldthan, Inc. - concurrent experience, 1963-66 - Listing and Sale of residential and farm properties in Hendricks and rlarion Counties -B.tJ. Duck & Associates, Inc. - 9/6/66 - 5/1/70 - Associate appraiser, residential, com�-nercial and industrial properties throughout the state of Indiana � -Zndependent fee appraiser and analyst -Co�unity Arts, Inc. - developers -Arts Construction, Inc. - general contractors -Business Offices - Ft. Atkins.on, Wisconsin, and Indianapolis, Indiana � REAL ESTATE ANALYST'S QUALIFICATIONS - CONTINUED JA.r1ES L. EABB, JR. , ASA, SREA, ,fAI SPECIAL EX�ERIENCE: -Qualified as expert witness in [,layne County, lingola County, and Randolph County Circuit Courts; Marion County Superior. Gourt -Real Estate Developer and Broker -Market Analysis in numerous states a � . , � :. ; ; _�, ,; t jE �, �_ j f � - � i t � + --�y . , ; ---% _ _ � ��` ' -- , f � -- - �� B' ��. OF GREFN BAY WI S. �� , 425 S. ADAMS, GREEN BAY, WIS. 54301 • 437-8731 December 3(), t976 DONALD 1. SWETTE PAUL N. QUIGLEY Mr. Vililliam Frueh City Manager City Hall 215 Church Avenue Oshkosh, Wisconsin S49Q1 RE: Appraisals for Eight Parcels of Sawyer Cr�ek Bottom between Highway 41 and Ninth Avenu� Dear Mr. Frueh: At your request, we have reviewed the regulations of r.he Department of Natural Resaurces for appraisals conducted for the purpose of matching funds as well as the "AgreemenC for Final Appraisal" which we understand includes the require- ments for Lawcon and C. D. funds. The requirements are generally the same and related to methods and reports which conform to recognized appraisal practices and to the principles of evaluating property for determining values in eminertt domain proceedings. A separate appraisal is required for each ownership. As I understand your reference material, this would mean eight separate parcels and eight reports. The ninth owner, Donald E. Basler, would appear to be only an adjoining properry owner not involved with the project. Since the preliminary project estimates exceed a value of �25, 000. , the D\TR regutations demand a"formal appraisal report". These requirements are quite similar to those found in the "Agreement for Final Appraisal". The report is in narrative form and contains a svbstantial amount of detail requiring research and confirrnation. Mr. William Frueh December 30, 1976 Page 2 Our prior experience with several of these projects in the metropolitan Green Bay area indicates that a substantial amount of time is requireci to gather the data, apply the appraisal process and complete the report in the detail necessary to meet the various agency requirements. In the process, consideration musC be given to partial takings and their influence upon the whole resulting in potential damages beyond the Fair Market Value of the taking alone. Based on a preliminary review of the property and the appraisals required, we feel that the work can be compieted within the time frame indicated on a fee basis of $500. per parcel or a total of $4, 000. for the eight-parcel project. In the event that testimony is required in any legal proceed- ings and we must appear as a witness, compensation would be in the sum of $150. per day for each full day's attendance in court or �75. for each one-half day or less. Additional services beyond those previously mentioned would be avail- able and charged at our regular rate of �25. per hour. An "Agreement for Final Appraisal" would be entered into with the appropriate agency of the Ciry of Oshkosh on the basis of this proposal if agreeable with your approvir�g authority. We enjoyed meeting with you and members of your staff, and look forward to the opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, APPRA_ISERS INC. OF G&EEN.BAY "-�.:.._: � �=-i,;� ; s� ;>!,'' > � � % ..- , . - - .��- �/"�--> �`�Donald J. Swetre;'"S A �.. mb r � ✓ cc: Mr. Boyd A. Kraerner Director of Parks / �. r '.. , . � �� :�� - � -- �°� FOX VALLEY APPRAISALS, II�C. � � � y4-°T�l".•� ._..� .:f _\ . 1302 OAKCREST COURT • APPLETON, WISCONSIN 54911 • PHONE 733-4979 JOSEPH H. DOERFLER, M.A.I., S.R.PA. Presi dent STEPHEN J. DOERFLER v`°P`�'d�,t February 1, 1977 NIr o Boyd A. Kraemer Director of Parks City of Oshkosh City riall 215 Church Avenue Oshkosh, WI 54901 Dear nir . Kraemer : O After viewing the parcels to be appraised for the Sawyer Creek GJater Shed-Nature Park, my fee for these parcels caould be $3,500. Z understand that the Basler property does not require an appraisalo I would be appraising the Lutheran Church property, I��ercy I�edical Center land, the John F. Tank farm, the GJi119_am T•:anske, et al farm, the Seibold, et aI farm, the Geffers farr�, the Fenrich property, and the Cwen property. I would be able to start February lSth, and es}imate the time to complete at five to six weekse If you need any information or explanation, please contact me. JHD:vb Sincerely, FOX VI�LLEY APPRAIS�?LS, INC, t 1 � ,% ,> F j ,��,��. ��---. u% �� Joseph H. Doerfler� A.�I SRPA . � ,� � P R E L I M I N A R Y 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM CITY OF OSHKOSH Prepared -- September 30, 1976 lst Revision -- October 25, 1976 :'_nd Revision -- November 23, 1976 3d Revision -- February 21, 1977 4th Revision -- February 23, 1977 5th Revision --- February 29, 1977 � � . � PROJECT I. STREET SURFACING A. Major and Collector 1) Murdock Avenue-Algom< to Jackson(4900') Concre te 2) New York Avenue - Main to Hazel- w/3" asphalt from Main to Bowen, remainder concrete(4,000') 3) Hazel Street-Murdock to New York(2,600') concre te 4. R. R. Crossinq on P1ew York Ave. as require 5) Monument Square - Commerce & Market - Pearl to Algoma 6) Walkway West - Church to Algoma 7) Wisconsin - Irving to New York (2,700') Concre te 8) Robin - Westfield to Koeller 9) Jackson-Irving � Intersection TOTAL PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ,� ASSESSMENT AIDS CITY TOTAL � $ 96,336 $ 51,700 $ 60,000 d bv P.S.C. -- $ 47,000 $ 80,000 $ 70,560 $ 25,400 430,996 I � $346,800 $119,000 $123,000 44,000 $ 90,U00 %�(C.D.) , $102,240 '�� ;; ( C . D . ) 853,540 -2- � $ 31,864 $ 4,000 I � I $ 13,600 $ 17,000 106,264 � $475,000 $170,700 $187,000 44,000 $137,000 $ 80,0�0 $172,800 �� $ 39,000 $ 17,000 1,390.800 t . PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - _... .. , - - ,- --- ---- -- - - - - - IROJFCT ASSESSMENT B. Community Development St ets 3" Asphalt w/Concrete Cu & Gutter 1) WRIGHT �TREET - Irvin to Prospect(2,000') $18,000 2) PROSPECT AVENUE -Cherr Street to Jackson (720') $ 7,300 3) SCOTT AVENUE -Elmwood to Jackson(2,000') $18,000 . 4) CHARLES AVENUE - Elmwood to McKinley (350') $ 3,500 5 ) LINCOLt� AVENUE - Elmwood to Jackson (1,480') $15,500 TOTAL $62,300 AIDS I crTx $26,000 --- $ 8,540 --- $26,000 --- $ 4,200 --- $17,060 --- $81,800 --- - ' —3— TOTAL $ 44,000 $ 15,840 $ 44,000 $ 7-,700 $ 32,560 $144,i00 ,� � . . PROPOSED 19�7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAI�I P??C� ;CT =.SSESSi�IFNT ----- C. Asphalt Pav�ng and Over1 y � �} South Park-Ohio to �� Main (3,650') � 36,500 ;i � j 2)� We s t 15 th - Soo Line � tracks to Oregon (2,100 feet) 5 21 000 , 3) Lincoln - Main to CNW tracks(1,500') Y 15,000 4) Jefferson - Parkway to Lincoln(1,600') 5 16 000 , 5) Mt. Vernon - Merritt " to Lincoln (2,500') � 25 000 , 6) Grand - Merritt to Lincoln (2,500') $ 25,000 ' 7) Dale - Mt. Vernan to � � Grand (750') $ 7,500 ; 8) Oxford - Mt, Vernon - to Grand (750') $ 7,500 9) Hudson - Mt. Vernon to Grand (700') $ 7,500 10) Madison - Merritt to Hudson (550') $ 5,500 11} pleasant - Merritt to k Hudson (550') $ 5,500 12) West 6th - Sawyer to , Knapp (1,200') $ I4,500 13) West 7th - Sawyez to � Knapp (1,200') $ 14,500 AIDS --- � __ _ I I -4- � cz�rx $ 18,250 $ 10, 500 $ 7,500 $ 8,000 , $ I2,500 $ 12,500 $ 3,750 $ 3, 750 $ 3,500 $ 2,750 $ 2,750 � $ 7,500 $ 7,500 TOTAL $ 54,750 $ 31,500 $ 22,500 $ 24,000 -$ 37,500 $ 37,500 ' $ 11,250 $ I1,250 � $ 11, 000 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 _ � $ 22,000 $ 22,000 � � � � , PP.OJECT Asphalt Paving & Overlay 14) �;est 14th.- Ohio to Soo Line tracks (3�0') � 15) Parkway - Main to Hazel TOTAL - PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM , ASSESSf•1EIQT $ 10,400 $ 39,000 250,400 AIDS . — 5 — __ _ _ I I I �z�rx $ 5,350 $ 19,500 125,600 �roT�L $ 15,750 $ 58,500 376,000 � . PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRCJECT ASSESSMENT D. Grading and Graveling 1) Crane Street - `�;ilson north $ 1,300 2) `•.'ain Street - Libbey '_venue to Packer Ave. $ 4,200 3) :'ernau Avenue - Main to eas t 1300' _.._ iOTAL - $ 5,500 TOTAL - STREET SURFACIN $�49,196 AIDS � CITY "- $ 1, 200 --- $ 5,880 "- $ 10, 400 --- $ 17,480 $935.340 � $249,344 -6- . TOTAL $ 2,500 $ 10,080 $ 10,400 $ 22,980 L;933,880 FUNDING CITY PORTION STREET IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND Balance 12/31/76 Estimated Costs Estimated Balance Bonding - 7 - 92,425 249,344 -156,919 157,000 � 0 PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - .. , PHOJECT ASSESSMENT II. STORM SEWER 1) Murdock --- 2) New York --- 3) Hazel --- 4) Walkway West --- -',5) Bay,Broad,Mi11 and Washington area 6) Bowen St. - Murdoc to Mallard --- 7) West 20th-Georgia to Patrician Villag --- 8) Eagle St. -Arthur to Sawyer Creek --- 9) Wisconsin Street --- 10) Wright Street --- 11) Prospect Avenue --- 12) Scott Avenue --- 13) Charles Avenue --- 14) Lincoln Avenue --- l�) N.Main - Libbey to Packer -__ 16) Irving-Jackson Intersection --- TOTAL -_- �;Bay-Broad-Mill «rea - unds & Washington AZDS I CITY --- $ 25,000 --- $ 45,000 --- $ 10,000 --- $ 8,000 $112,5Q0 $450,000 --- $ 20,000 --- $ 20,000 --- $ 6,000 --- $ 10,000 --- $ 8,000 --- $ 3,000 --- , $ 10,000 _ --- ' $ 2,000 --- $ 5,000 --- $ 15,000 _ --- $ 3,500 $112,500 * �640,500 not recei until �roject ' complete. : TOTAla $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 10,000 � $ 8,000 � $450,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 ` $ 6,000 $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 3,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 3,500 $640,500 F�NDING CITY POR�ION STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND Balance 12/31/76 Estimated Costs Estimated Balance Bonding Q'� 46,864 640,500 -593,636 595,000 0 PRdPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - ..�. ., .� PROJECT ASSESSMENT III. SANITARY SEWERS 1) Murdock Avenue --- 2) New York�Avenue --- 3) Hazel Street --- 4) Bong Court Replacement --- 5) Crane 5treet - Wilson to park � site $ 2,800 6) Town Island - • Jackson Street $ 4,000 7) Town Island - Oshkosh Avenue $ 9,000 8) Wright Street --- 9) Prospect Avenue --- 10) Scott Avenue --- I1) Charles Avenue --- 12) Lincoln Avenue -- 13) Main.-Libbey to Packer $ 6,400 TOTAL $22,200 AIDS ---' � � -10- CITY I TOTAL $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,200 $ 5,000 $ 6,000 ' $ 10,000 $ 44,000 $ 53,000 • $ 20,000 - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 9,600 259,.800 $ 16,000 282,Q00 —; FUNDING CITY PORTION SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND Balance 12/31/76 Estimated Costs Estimated Balance Recommended Bonding 461,000 259,800 � � *Use of Sewer Depreciation Funds ($461,000) which would require Council authorization. -11- � PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • � � PROJECT ASSESSMENT IV. WATER MAINS 1) Murdock Avenue --- 2) New York Avenue --- � 3) Hazel Street --- 4) Nevada Avenue --- 5) Central Avenue --- 6) Lampert & Legion S . --- 7)'Poplar Avenue --- 8) E.Irving Avenue --- ' 9) Crane Street $ 2,800 10) Town Island � Jackson Street $ 3,000 11) Town Island Oshkosh Avenue $ 9,000 12) Wisconsin Street --- 13) Wright Street --- R 14) Prospect Street --- 15) Scott Avenue --- ' 16) Charles Street --- 17) Lincoln Avenue --- 18) Main - Libbey to Packer $ 6,400 TOTAL $ 21,200 AIDS � � -12- CITY � TOTAL � $ 7,SQ0 $ 7,500 $ 7,000 $ ?,000 $ 26,000 $ 26,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 � $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 14, 040 $ 1�+, 000 $ 8�000 $ 8,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 , f $ 2�200 $ 5,000 $ 3,600 $ b,600 $ 31,000 $ 40,000 . $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 2�� $ �� $ 4,000 $ 4,000 � $ 7�000 $ ?,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 '_ $ 16,600 $ 23,000 $233,400 $254,600 FUNnYNG --�------_._-- CITY� PORTION WATER M1�IN CONSTRUCTION FUND Balance 12/31/76 Estimated Costs Estimated Balance Bonding -13- 57,886 233,400 �175,514 176,000 . YROJECT V. SIDEWALK PROGRAM 1) City sidewalk - West 9th Avenue 2) Property owners' � sidewalk program TOTAL PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM _ .... .. � ASSESSMENT $81,000 $81,000 AIDS � CITY --- $15,000 --- $15,000 . -14- TOTAL $15,000 $81,000 $96,000 �� 0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVOLVING FUND Balance 2�2p�� Estimated Costs Street Surfacing Sanitary Sewers Water Mains Sidewalks Estimated Balance Bonding -15- $343,564 749,196 22,200 21�200 81,,000 TOTAL . . . 873,596 -530,032 531,000 u 0 PROPQSED 1977 CAPIT�'1L ITIPRJVD�'�NT PROGR;aA4 ........_ . .......... ....... .. ...... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .� .. . . . . . � . . - . . . . . PROJE�T ASSESSMENT AIDS CITy yT. Parks A. �evelo�ment 1) Fagoma Park �hase ITI �ompl�ti�n �arking Lot Tent�is ��ourt� • 2) V'�estha�°en park (�hase ;TT � (:ompletion) Tenni:; Couxts �3) South �ark a) Brid�e-Walk�,�ay (Replacemenfi) 4) Mes�om :ner Park �c�o (?hase I) 5) Stevens Park _ �7'isLa�) 6} BaLUnan Park (Total) 7) SofLball Facili- ties (lighted) Location pending Parks Advisory Cormnittee Resolution SUB-TOTAL * 1�J77 Corrnnunity Development Ft "x 1976 Comrmanity Development Ft � -„_ � . _, $. �- $ --- $ --. � __., $ --- $ --- $ --- inds mds $ S,OOC* $ 13,500** $ 16,000* � 5,OOOk $ 40,000* $ 10,000* $ 26,500* $ --- $ 116,000 -16-- $ --- $ 2,500 � $ --- $ --- $ --- $ 12,500 � --- $ 30,000 $ 45,000 TOTAI. � S,OOG $ 16,OU0 $ 16,U00 $ 5,000 $ 40,000 � $ 22,500 $ 26,500 $ 30,000 $ 161,U00 PROJECT PROPOSED 1977 CAPITAL IMPROVFMENT PROGRAM a ASSESSMENT AIDS B. Acquisztion 1) Sawyer Creek Area 2) Northside Area 3) Campbell Creek Area SUB-TOTAL *X� LAjtiCON Total Development Total Acquisition $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- $ 20,000*** $ 42,500*** $ 10,000X** $ 72,500 -17- $116,000 $ 72,500 CITY � TOTAL $ 20,000 $ 42,500 $ 10,000 $ 72,500 � $ 45,000 $ 72,500 $ 40,000 $ 85,000 $ 20,000 $145,000 $161,000 $145,000 , F[JNDING CITY PORTION Park Development Fund Balance 2/18/77 � 8�g32 Stanhilber Trust Fund �alance 12/31/76 36,200 Subdivision Platting Fee Account 12/31/76 12,750 1976 Community Development Fund 13,500 1977 Co�rnnunity Development Fund (Includes 1976 carryover) 102,500 1977 LA1dCON Aids 72,500 ESTIMATED BALANCE $�� Total Estimated Costs Total Estimated Balance Total Recommended Bonding -18- $306,000 $ 59,718 $ 60,000 ..�..r...�.. • PROPOSED 1977 CAPiTAL IMPRQVEriENT PROGRAM 1 PROJECT ASSESS�tENT AIDS CITY TOTAL VII. OTHER 1) Rubber Tired End Loader 2) Snow Loader 3) Voting Machines 4) Bookmobile 5) PoliCe ;:nt ,. Facility TOTAL �, I' : � , j� i $ ___ g --- $ ---' $ _..�. $ �-- $ ___ 19 $ �_.. S --- $ _r. $ --- S --- ��- $ ^0- $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 10,000 $ 60,d00 $ 300,OOQ $ 460,000 $ 45,000>; £ $ 45,000� $ 10, 0� $ 60, 0� $ 300,01 $ 460,000� � FUNDING CITY PORTION All Other Projects Fund Balances 12/31/76 Estimated Costs Estimated Balance Recommended I�onding -?C1- � $ _� $ 46Q�000 -460,000 460�OQ0 ti SUMMARIES PROPOSED 1977 BONDING PROGRAM FOR CITY PURPOSES Street Improvement Storm Sewers Sanitary Sewers Water Mains Sidewalks Special Assessment Revolving Fund Parks Other Sub--�total FOR SUBDIVISION PURPOSES * Storm Sewers Water Mains Special Assessment Revolving Fund Sub--total Total $ 157,000 595 � L100 �OR 176,Q00 15,Q00 531rQ00 60,000 460�OOQ $1,994�000 1,700 00 219,3�0 $ 221,000 $2�215,000 *This would fund the Kinney Kruger, Foreign Flair, and First Addition to Westbrook Subdi�isions under the assumption of assessing the full storm sewer cost, up to $10 per front foot of lots created. Lots cre- ated would be 112, which would accommodate 218 dwelling units. - 21 -� trirxuv�,M�N'1'S x�,t�uttc�;ll Pux NEW SUBll1VISLONS L' . . PROJECT ASSESSMENT I. GRADING & GRAVELING 1) 4th Addn.Westhaven $ 50,000 2) Kinney-Krueger Plats $ 10,000 3)lst Addn.Westbrook $ 21,000 4) lst Addn. Westway $ 15,000 5) Foreign Flair Plat $ 17,500 6) Parkside Plat $ LO,b00 � TOTAL - NEW PLATS $123,500� AIDS _22_ CITY TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 21,000 $ 15,000 $ 17,500 10 000 $123,500 � IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS ' .... � � PROJECT ASSESSMENT II. STORM SEWER 1) 4th Addn. Westhave -__ 2) Kinney-Krueger Pla -__ . 3) lst Addn. Westbroo --_ 4) lst Addn. Westway __ 5) Foreign Flair Plat ___ 6) Parkside Plat ___ �� TOTAL - NEW PLATS ___ AIDS . -23- CITY $140,000 $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ 48,000 $ 24,500 $ 28,500 $286,000 TOTAL $140,000 $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ 48,000 $ 24,500 28 500 $286,000 _ � �. . IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS ' _ .. . � PROJECT ASSESSMENT AZDS III, SANITARY SEWERS 1) 4th Addn.Westhave $125,000 _ 2) Kinney-Krueger Pla s$ 25,000 ___ . 3) Witzel Avenue 1200' wes t of Washburn to 2600'w, of Washburn(to accomodate lst ! Addn.Westbrook) $ 5,.100 � � --- . i, 4) lst Addn.Westbrook $ 35,000 ___ j 5) lst Addn. Westway $ 25 000 ' � - - i %',6) Lift Station - r We s tway $20,000 � --- --- �s TOTAL - NEW PLATS $215,100 ___ �` Money in 1976 Capital Improvement Prog am , -24- CITY $ 10,000 TOTAL $135,000 $ 25,000 $ 39,900 $ 45,000 -"" ' $ 35,000 --- ' $ 25,000 --�— ----______ $ 49,900 $265,000 r• . ?ROJHCT IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS .� ASSFSSMENT IV. WATER MAINS 1) 4th Addn. to Westhave $110,000 2� Kinney-Krueger Plats $ 13,000 3) Witzel -1200'to 2600' west of Washburn $ 5,100 4) lst Addn. to Westbroo $ 30,000 5) lst Addn. to Westway $ 25,000 TOTAL - NEW PLATS $183,100 AIDS CITY TOTAL $ 10,000 $120,000 --- $ 13,000 $ 34,500 $ 39,600 --- $ 30,000 --- $ 25,000 $ 44,500 $227,600 Total �-New Subdivisi n Grading & Graveling 123,500 �---- --- : 123,500 - � Storm Sewer --- --- 286,000 �286,000 � , _ Sanitary Sewer 21�,100 --- , : 49,900 , 265,000 Water Main 183,100 ---- 44,500 227,600 Grant Totals 521,700 000 380,400 902,100 Therefore, to fund ne subdivisions wo d require G.O. nds for $521,70 more into Special Assessment Re olving Fund and 330,500 more int Storm Sewers & ater Mains. The $49,900 for Sanit y Sewers could ome from the San'tary Sewer Utili y Depreciation Fund. -25- - -__ � � f r-{ Ci� O -I-� N � � � Cd U �- L�- � � r� ti `-.� �� `3 � O oa � � � � O N �rl � � a� � � � o o �, � � r' �- a) � �..� x r-� :��,: ,.. �. � a O b Q O H �r 0 � +� O � o � a� o -+� +� �o •� a� +� ^ 3 � �� v � � � � U -H� U] U -I� ''d ai N � � +� � cd cd r-I N ^ 4D � � � � � ¢i`d O N ri �-I -I � W rd +� ¢+ �d N � � �r � U � ~ '� 4J cd �-I rl � 4-+ � � O cd cd � � � cd N •rl � .N �z, N o � cd td ',3 O H �' � N O �-t Ul ^ .. � � o �' -I-� O r-I o o� � a�m •rl Q3 4--I N -EA- +� 0 � o �+ � � o �, � � � N cd O � F-i O UI bD O U� O O •rl � � � � O P-i tn O ��-, �' $-� �+ � a 0 .-. N O 11� -F� �if} O � •r� � � 1 cn O � Q} � O �O }, cd O rl � O � rl ^ cd u� rd -I� O �' zs o u� � N E—i ^ .t-{ N U] � •. {r'} R� � � �, �' a-' cd O � O o � •a�� i-� 0 � � � N � � N .,-{ �-I k cd U � ...i � � O N .r1 O -F� �-+ � � o -� � � N � Cr � � � O � � � . O 'Zj H N .�{ .. ,C{ � � O � .� U � 0 � N ,�j � , � r-i � M r"� U � � � � � U �