HomeMy WebLinkAbout29359 / 78-20March 2, 1978
_�,
�: � •
PURPOSE: CONTRACT FOR GOVERNMENT STUbY
tNIT1ATED BY: CIIY ADMIN{STRATION
# 20 RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the q�estion of wheth?r Lhe Co���cil-Manager cities of Wisconsin
could benefit from having the�ootion of a rayor as the chief elected official
is one which m�rits more study, and
WHEREAS, funding is now availabLe for such a study,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Councii of ths City of Oshkosh
that the propsr city cfficials ar� hereby authorized and directed to enter into
fihe attached �greement with Community P�esea�ch and Management, Inc. for a study
as set forCh above. Funding is to came frc�7 the Department of Locat Affairs and
Developmer�t a�d the Wisconsin City Managers Association.
- 20 -
SUBMITTED 8Y
,� i <
CITY OF OSHKOSH 1977-79
DLA� Conununity Development
Grant Project
CONTRACT AGREEMENi
with
' COMrNNITY RESEARCH AivrD MANAGEMENT, INC.
for the preparation of a
STUDY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE
PROPOSITION THAT WISCONSIN COUNCIL-MANAGER
CITZ�,S WOIILD BEI3EFIT FROM HAVING THE
�PTION OF A MAYOR AS CHIEF ELECTED
OFFICIAL AND, IF S0, HOW THE OPTION
WOULD BE MADE AVAIIyABLE AND ADOPTED
CD Project 41
March, 1978
�
� ��
� �
0
�
Contract Agreement
between
Community Research and Management, Inc.
and
The City of Oshkosh
I. This AGREEMENT entered into on this day of March, 1978 by and
between Community Research and Management, Inc., hereinafter called
CRM, Inc., and the City of Oshkosh, hereinafter called the City.
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City has received a grant from the Department of Local
Affairs and Development for the purpose of hiring a private consultant
in conjunction with a Project Review Committee to study and possibly
determine whether Wisconsin Council-Manager cities would benefit €rom
having the option of a mayor as chief elected official and
iJHEREAS, CRM, Inc., has submitted a detailed proposal to the City and
has been selected to conduct the work outlined in the proposal by a
Project Review Committee appointed by the City,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
as hereinafter set forth, the parties to this contract mutually agree
as fo�lows:
II. Scope of Work to be Undertaken by CRM, Inc.
A. CRM, Inc., will examine the following topics during the course
of the study:
1. The legislative history which ailowed the present legislation
to become enacted. �
2. The role of the League of Municipalities and governmental
study groups in the past 30 years relating to changes in
the Council-Manager plan.
3. Wisconsin cities abandonment of the plan and an examination
of referenda on the continuation of the plan.
4. Council-Manager cities operations and operations under the
provisions of the existing statutes including the variations,
and appointment procedures for comr�ittees.
5. The legal imol�.cations of the existing practices; possible
changes under home rule authority, and the perceptions of
the City Attorneys in Council-Manager communities.
6. The findings and recommendations of the National, form of
Government Committee of ICMA.
7. The perceptions of elected and appointed officials as to
the operation of the present form of government as opposed
to some possible alternatives. .
8. Legislator's feQiings about the present form of government
as apposed to some possible alternatives.
9. The public's perception of the operation of the plan as
opposed to possible alternatives.
-'�
�
�-
10. The alternatives to the existing situation.
11. Roles of Wisconsin Mayors compared to City Managers in Council-
Manager cities. ,
12. The experience of the Council-Manager plan in neighboring states.
13. An explanation of why have there been so few cities adopting
the Council-Manager plan in Wisconsin.
14. The specific history in Oshkosh relating to the operation of
the plan.
15.' The role of a Mayor in a typical Wisconsin Council-Manager city.
16. The impact of possible changes on Wisconsin villages.
17. The implications associated with the recent growth in the
number of cities in Wisconsin that have adopted a plan
reflecting the position of a Chief Administratos.
18. The significance of the size of governing bodies and the
method of selection in Wisconsin municipalities.
B. CRM, Inc., will, working with the project review committee and others,
carryout the following work phases: "
Week One
Community Research and Management, Inc., will meet with the
committee to review the objectives of the project, questions to be
answered and the methadology for collecting the data. The con-
sultant will present a list of the data to be collected and a
summary of the methodology proposed for gathering the data to �
the cammittee for their reaction and approval.
Week O,ne, Two, Three, Four and Five
Comtr,unity Research and Management, Inc., will conduct surveys,
interviews, research documents, and assemble data which is directly
related and pertinent to the issues and questions raised by the
committee. Any survey instruments or interview documents prepared
for distribution or use wi�l be made available to the committee
prior to final application.
Weeks Six and Seven
The consultant will analyze the data and prepare a draft document
presenting the preliminary data and findings. In addition, the con-
sultant will prepare draft alternatives uaing a"decision agenda"
approach for review and discussion by the committee. The documents
will be distribuLed tc th2 c�;nmittee in ad:%ance of a mceting for their
review.
Week Bight
The consultant will meet with the committee to receive reactions
to the draft data and findings report and, most importantly, to review
the committee's decisions or the alternatives to be developed. The
goal of the co�aittee meeting will, be to review and approve or modify
the re��ort on data and findings and to develop a draft document which
reflects the committee's preliminary recommendations for alternatives.
Weeks Nine, Ten and Eleven
The preliminary recommended alternatives will be widely circulated
for reaction, feed-back, and general comments. The comments will be
solicited from elected and appointed local officials, public and private,
non-profit agencies, and any oCher group or individuals suggested by
the committee. The consultant will collect and record all comments
received and attempC to summarize them for the committee.
.
�
�°
���
/
Week Twelve
The consultant will meet with the committee to review the
alternatives and the input from others on these. Decisi�ons will be
made to modify or change the draft alternatives. After the committee
has adopted the final version of the alternatives, they will develop,
with sta£f help from the consultant, the criteria they want utilized
in an objective evaluation of the alternatives by the consultant.
Weeic Thirteen
0
The consultant will prepare an ob�ective analysis of the
alternatives using criteria recommended by the committee. This
document will be distributed to the committee prior to their
next meeting. . .
Weeks Fourteen and Fifteen
The committee, meeting with the consultant� will decide which
alternatives they want to recommend. ?'he consultant will then prepare
a draft p�an for.implementing the alternatives developed by_the
committee. The final component will be an evaluation plan.
Week Sixteen
The committee, meeting with the consultant, will review and
comment on the draft implementation plans and evaluation and instruct
the consultant to make the appropriate changes and modifications.
Weeks Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, and TwentY
The cor.su:tant will prepare the.final repor�. which wi12 include
� three parts. It will contain data and findings, recommended alternatives,
and a p?an for implementation and evaluation. During this final stage
of the process the committee will meet once to review the final imple-
mentation and pvaluation plans.
III. Time Schedule
This project shall official2y begin on March 15, 1978 and be completed
by August 15, 197$ unless such contract period is extended by mutual written
agreement between the parties to this contract.
IV. Schedule of Fees
The toal cost of this project is eight thousand dollars, ($8,000.00).
The payment schedule will be as follows:
l. Upon satisiactory complerion of a document presenting the
preliminary data and findings and draft alternatives -
Week six and seven - payment of $3,OQ0.00.
2. Upon satisfactory completion of a document which summarizes the
reactions and comments of groups and individuals to the preliminary
reco�ended alternatives - Week ten - payment of $2,000.00.
3. Upon satisfactorily preparing a document which sets forth a
draft plan for implementing the alternatives developed by the
committee - Week sixteen - payment of $2,000.00.
4. Upon satisfactorily preparing the final report - Week Twenty -
payment of $1,OE?0.00.
V. Records and Revorts
CRM, Inc., will assist the City in meeting all of the periodic raporting
requirements mandated by the Wisconsin Department of Local Affairs and
Develo����4nt.
0
VI. Miscellaneous
�
�
,�
1. Termination of Contract for Cause. If, through any cause, C1tM, Inc.,
shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner the obligations
under this Contract, or if CRM, Inc., shall violate any of the
covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Contract, the City
shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Contract by
giving written notice to CRM, Inc., of such termination, specifying
the effective date thereof, at least five days before the effective
date of such tennination. �
2. The scope of services to be performed and the total amount payable
under this contract, including any increase or decrease in CRM, Inc.,
compensation under this Contract, may be amended or supplemented by
unanimous written agreement by the parties to the Contract.
3. CRM, Inc., shall provide 25 copies of the completed report to the
City. Additional c�pies will be available at cost.
4. CRM, Inc., shall assist the City in preparing a final report detailing
the work activitj.es of the entire project period; the problems encoun-
tered; and the end results for DLAD.
5. CRM, InG•, will utilize a notation indicating the participatian of the
Department of Local Affairs and Development and that funds for the
project were made available�through a grant from the State of Wisconsin,
Department of Local Affairs and Development.
6. Equal Employr.ient Opportunity. In connection with the performance
of work under this contract, CRM, Inc., agrees not to discriminate
against any emplayee or applicant for employment because of age,
race, religio.n, color, handicap, sex, physical condition, developmentai
disability as defined�in s._51.01 (S), or national origin. This provision
shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertizing, lay-of€
or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection
for training, including apprenticeship. CRM, Inc., further agrees to
take affirmative action to insure equal employment opportunities for
persons with disabilities. CRM, Inc., agrees to post in conspicuous
places available for employees and applicants for employment notices
to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions
of the non-discrimination clause.
IN WITNESS W?�.REOF, CRM, inc., and the City have executed this agreement as of
the date indicated below:
FOR: CO�L'fUNITY RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT, INC.
215 Pierce Street
Arlington, Wisconsin 53911
�,'���.�•- � ^el ' �� -
�George A. Jame-�sident
�
� � �
WI N SS �� D�
ero e A. O'Connor, Vice President
FOR: CITY OF OSHKOSH
Converse Marks, Clerk
City of Oshkosh
William D. Frueh, City Manager
City of Oshkosh
Del La Marche, City Comptroller
City of Oshkosh
�
�
O
'�
�
O
H
�
O
•,—I
�
O
�
�
�
�
N
O
�
�
�
N
�
rd
N
.�
�
�
�
�
�„�,,.,,,,,......«...-�-- �—. _�....,.....
...,., �............. ......, �
Ya ����z�ffuu �
r��v� �t`�� _�
0
�
ti
�
�-�I
N
�
U
�
cC3
�
`\
� �
�
N
r1
U
i� �
�
ti-1
U
�