HomeMy WebLinkAbout34032 / 86-210►
July 17, 1986
(CARRIED
PURPOSE:
INITIATED BY:
1/210 RESOLUTION
LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WHEREAS, the City of Oshkosh has heretofore solicited proposals for engineering
services to study the aeration system at the wastewater treatment plant; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the submitted proposals and interviews with three
engineering firms, it appears the most advantageous proposal is presented by
Robert E. Lee and Associates, Inc., P. 0. Box 2100, Green Bay, Wisconsin,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Comnon Council of the City of Oshkosh
that said proposal is hereby accepted and the proper City officials are hereby author-
ized and directed to enter into the attached agreement for purpose of same.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that money for this purpose is hereby appropriated
from: Account No. 919-191 -- Sewer Utility - Construction in Progress.
I SODHITT?:D BY
��.�.� �e, �.�.�,�
APFRG:'�?J
- 17 -
��..
RESOLUTION #210
AGREEMENT FOR ENGZNEERING SERVICES BETFTEEN
THE CITY OF OSHICOSH, WISCONSIN
AND ROBERT E. LEE S ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING
THIS AGREEMENT, made and enteced into on this day of ,
1986, by and between the City of Oshkosh, Wisconsin hereinafter referred to as
the "Owner", and Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc., a corporation, authorized to
provide engineering services in the State of Wisconsin, hereinafter referred to
as "Engineer":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City of Oshkosh requires engineering services to plan
improvements to the wastewater trea[ment plant; and
WHEREAS, Engineer has available and offers to provide personnel and
facilities necessary to accomplish the work within the required time.
NOW THEREFORE, Owner and Engineer agree as follows:
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Owner and Engineer agree that the Project is as described in Exhibit A
entitled, "Description of Project" and dated July 15, 1986. If, during the
course of performing the engineering work, Owner and Engineer agree that it is
necessary to make changes in the Project as described in the exhibit, such
changes will be incorporated in the Agreement by written amendment.
II. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
Engineer agrees to perform those services which are more particularly
described hereafter. Unless modified in writing by both parties, duties of
Engineec shall not be construed to exceed those secvices specifically set forth
herein.
A. Planned Engineering Services
Engineer agrees to perform those planned tasks described in Exhibit
B entitled "SCOpe of Engineering Services", dated July 15, 1986.
B. Special En9ineering Services
O�oner and Engineer agree that certain portions of the work
contemp].ated to be performed by the Engineer cannot be defined sufficiently at
the time of execution of this Agreement, and that incidental engineering work
related to the project and not covered in Exhibit B, may be needed during
performance of this Agreement. It is intended that such categories of work be
classiLied as Special Engineering Services.
Contract
_ ��a _ Page 1 of 5
�
RESOLUTION #210
III. SCOPE OF OWNER SERVICES
The Owner shall provide all criteria and full information as to the
Owner's requirements and shall provide one copy of all reports, studies,
evaluations, plans and specifications, accurate as-built drawings, operating and
laboratory data, and budgets concecning the wastewater tzeatment plant
facilities. The Owner shall provide operating cost data for the existing
aecation equipment and shall provide information of projected incceases in
electrical tates if available.
IV. AUTHORIZATION, PROGRESS, AND COMPLETION
In signing this Agreement, the Owner grants the Engineer specific
authorization to proceed with vork described in Exhibit B, Parts B1 and B2. The
work shall be completed in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A.
For special engineering services, the authorization by the Owner shall
be in writing and shall include the definition of the work to be done. The
schedule for commencing and completing the work, and the basis for compensation
for the Work, all as agreed upon by the Owner and the Engineer.
V. COMPENSATZON
For the services described in Exhibit B which are to be performed by
the Engineer, the Owner agrees to pay, and the Engineer agrees to accept,
compensation in accordance with the methods and schedules set forth in Exhibit
C. Compensation for special engineering services shall be as agreed upon by the
Owner and Engineer as set forth in the written authorization for special
engineering services. Payment to the Engineer is due upon receipt of invoice by
the Ownez. If payment is noc made within 30 days, interest on the unpaid
balance vill accrue beginning with the 31st day at the rate of 1.0 percent per
month or the maximum interest rate permitted by law, whichever is lesser. Such
interest will become due and payable at the time said overdue payment is made.
Charges for reimbursable costs detecmined in accordance with Exhibit C
shall be billed in summary form to the Owner on monthly billing periods.
VI. RESPONSIBILITY OF ENGINEER
The Engineer is employed to render a professional service only, and any
payments made Lo the Engineer are compensation soiely for such services �endered
and recommendations made in carrying out the work. The Engineer shall follow
the practice of the civil engineering profession to make findings, opinions,
factual presentations, and professional advice and recommendations. The
Engineer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the Owner harmless from and
against any liability arising out of the sole negligent errors or sole negligent
omissions of the Engineer, its agents, employees, or representatives, in the
performance of the Engineer's duties under this Agreement.
In performing construction management secvices, the £ngineer shall act
as agent of the Or�ner. The Engineer's review or supervision of work prepared or
performed by other individuals or firms employed by the Owner shall not relieve
those individuals or firms of complete responsibility for the adequacy of their
work.
Contract
Page 2 of 5
- 17b -
RESOLUTION #210
It is understood that any resident engineering or inspection provided
by the Engineer is for the purpose of determining compliance with the technical
provisions of the project specifications and does not constitute any form of
guarantee or insurance with respect to the performance of a contractor. The
Engineer does not assume responsibility for methods or appliances used by a
contractor, for safety of construction work, or for compliance by contractors
with laws and regulations.
The Engineer shall notify the pamez of any potentially unsafe
conditions observed at a consttuction site while performing resident engineering
services. This responsibility is not intended to create a duty to any third
party. It is understood that the cesident engineer may, from time to time, be
physically absent from the construction site. At such tiroes the Engineer shall
have no duty to notify the Owner of potentially unsafe conditions at the
construction site. The Owner, in consideration of the risk of legal action
against the Engineer which results fcom this provision, shall indemnify and hold
the Engineer and all of its officers, principals, agents, and employees harmless
from any pcofessional liability claims for any injuries to persons or damage to
property which are related in any way to safety conditions. If legal
pcoceedings related to safety conditions are brought against the Engineer or any
of its officers, principals, agents, or employees, the Owner agrees to assume
defense theceof and pay all expenses, claims and judgments connected therewith.
VII. INSURANCE
The Engineer shall maintain during the life of this Agreement, the
following minimum public liability and property damage insurance which shall
protect the Engineer from claims for injuries including accidental death, as
well as from claims for property damages vhich may arise from the performance of
work under this Agreement and the limit of liability for such insurance shall be
as follows:
1. Comprehensive general liability insurance, including personal
injury liability, blanket contractual liability and broad form
property damage liability. The combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000.
2. Automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance
covering owned, nonowned, rented, and hired cars. The combined
single limit for bodily injury and propecty damage shall be not
less than �000,000.
3. Statutory workecs compensation and employer's liability insurance
foc the State of Wisconsin.
VIII. SUBCONTRACfS
The Engineer shall be entitled, to the extent detecmined appropriate by
the Engineer, to subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this
project. The Engineer shall be responsible to the Owner for the aceions of
persons and firms performing subcontract wosk.
Contract
Page 3 of 5
- 17c -
RESOLUTION #210
ix. r+ssicr�r�rrr
This Agreement is binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the
parties hereto. This Agreement is not to be assigned by either the Owner or
Engineer without the prior written consent of the other.
X. INTEGRATION
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the Owner and
Engineer as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written
understanding shall be of any force or effect vith respect to those matters
coveced hereundec. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in
writing signed by both parties.
XI. JURISDICTION
This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of
the State of Wisconsin. Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement
shall be in that state. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in
conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void
insofar as it is in conflict with said lavs, but the remainder of this Agreement
shall be in full force and effect.
XII. SUSPENSION OF WORK
The Owner may suspend, in writing, all or a portion of the work under
this Agreement in the event unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the
Owner make normal progress in the performance of the work impossible. The
Engineer may request that the vork be suspended by notifying the Ownec, in
writing, of circumstances which are interfering with normal progress of the
work. The time for completion of the work shall be extended by the number of
days the work is suspended. In the event that the period of suspension exceeds
90 days, the terms of this Agreement are subject to renegotiation and both
parties are granted the option to terminate work on the suspended portion of the
project in accordance with Article XIII.
XIII. TERMINATION OF WORR
The Owner may terminate all or a
Agreement for its convenience. Either the
work in the event the other party fails
provisions of this Agreement. Termination
15 days prior written notice from the party
Notice of termination shall be delivered
delivery returned to the sender.
portion of the work covered by this
Owner or the Engineec may terminate
to perform in accordance with the
of this Agreement is accomplished by
initiating termination to the othec.
by certified mail with receipt for
In the event of termination, the Engineer shall perform such additional
work as is necessary for the orderly filing of documents and closing of the
project. The additional time for filing and closing shall not exceed 10 percent
of the total time expended on the completed portion of the project prior to the
effective date of termination.
Contract
Page 4 of 5
- 17d -
RESOLUTION #210
The Engineer shall be compensated for the completed poction of the work
on the basis of work actually performed prior to the effective date of termina-
tion plus the work required for filing and closing. Charges for the latter work
are subject to the 10 perceni limitation described in this Article.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
ROBERT E. LEE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY G'�'C��/VCr ,
Ro rt E. Lee, President
r
By T'—����. �� �
Richard S. Swiontek, Secretary
Date VU�y �� i ��i�o
- 17e -
CITY OF OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN
By
By
William D. Frueh, City Manager
Donna C. Serwas,
Date
ty Clerk
Contract
Page S of 5
RESOLUTION #210
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF OSHROSH
DESCRIPTION OF PR0.TECT
JULY 15, 1986
Engineering services pcovided undez the terms of this Agreement are
required to conduct an evaluation of aeration system alternatives and to
evaluate the feasibility of using biological phosphorus removal at the waste-
water treatment plant. The work would be performed in two parts; the aeration
systems study, and the biological phosphorus removal study.
Aeration SYstem Study
The study for the Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant aeration system
improvements would include an evaluation to determine the optimum aeration
system, dissolved oxygen control system, and blower system. The study will
evaluate the capital costs as well as the operation and maintenance costs
associated with repairing the existing mechanical aerators versus installing a
new, more energy efficient fine bubble aeration system. The fine bubble
aeration systems would be evaluated by developing a preliminary layout for each
system so that capital and operating costs could be estimated.
The two alternatives for fine bubble aeration equipment that will be
evaluated for the Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant are the Sanitaire ceramic
disc system and the Wyss flexible sheath system, each of which has advantages
and disadvantages. The ceramic disc system provides the highest aeration
efficiency available; however, this must be balanced by other considerations,
particularly in a retrofit application where the existing aecation tanks are not
specifically designed for their use.
The arrangement of the existing aeration tanks will be reviewed to
determine if modifications will be needed. The ceramic disc system has very
limited lateral mixing and is normally applied in a plug flow tank arrangement
to prevent short circuiting. The existing mechanical aeration system is a
canplete mix tank arcangement so inlet and outlet modifications may be needed.
The wastewater characteristics will be reviewed to detecmine the potential
foc scale formation and biological foulir.g. The headloss charactecistics of the
diffuser systems will be evaluated and accounted for. When biological fouling
occurs, the pressure not only goes up but the oxygen tcansfer efficiency
decreases due to the bubbles coalescing. A decrease of ten percent in the
transfer efficiency of the ceramic disc diffuser would make it equal to a
flexible sheath diffuser efficiency. In estimating operating costs, careful
consideration will be made for the field cocrection factors, alpha and beta.
Consideration will be made for determining the minimum to maximum operating
range of the diffuser. A 1 to 4 range is normally possible. For maximum
efficiency the system should be designed for meeting the minimum loads with the
minimum air flow. Diffusers can be added in the future to meet increases in
loadings.
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 3
- 17 f -
RESOLUTION #210
After all the factors involved with the design of the fine bubble aeration
system are considered, the capital and operating costs will be estimated and the
present worth of the alternatives will be determined. The cost factors will be
then assessed vith noneconomic factors such as reliability, flexibility and
risk, and a selection will be made.
An equally important aspect in the design of a fine bubble aeration system
is the selection of a dissolved oxygen (D.O.) conttol system. Typically,
automatic D.O. control systems have proven to be cost-effective for treatment
plants with flows greater than 1 mgd; however, the instrumentation required is
expensive and maintenance intensive. In evaluating the need for an automatic
D.O. control system, factors such as plant staffing and the variability in
loadings must be reviewed. If an operatoc is on duty 29 hours a day, the system
can be manually controlled or semi-automatically controlled. In manual control
the operator would measure the D.O. and adjust the system. In the semi-
automatic system the D.O. would be constantly monitored by an on-line analyzer
and the operator would adjust the system when it deviated from the operating
cange. The suitability of each system also depends on the variability of the
wastewater characteristics. Relatively constant characteristics favor manual or
semi-autanatic control. When waste characteristics change rapidly only
automatic systems can be applied effectively.
The selection of a D.O. control system will be made in conjunction with the
selection of a blower system. A compacative evaluation of centrifugal or
positive displacement blowers will be conducted. A major advantage of the
centrifugal blower is the ability to modulate output with an inlet valve. This
is a relatively inexpensive method of control that can be used to provide an
output of 50 to 100 percent. The output of the positive displacement blower is
regulated by varying the speed. A positive displacement blower can be regulated
by a variable speed drive, the most efficient of which is an adjustable
frequency drive.
The final selection of the blowet will be made in conjunction with the
selection of the D.O. control system based on an analysis of economic and
noneconomic factors. The two alternatives, blowers and the D.O. control system,
cannot be considered independently.
Bioloqical Phosphorus Removal Process Study
The biological phosphorus removal process evaluation would determine the
suitability of using a modification of the existing activated sludge system to
remove phosphorus. If the biological phosphocus removal pcocess can be used,
chemical costs can be eliminated and sludge settleability can generally be
improved. Eliminating chemical usage will also significantly reduce sludge
volumes.
The study will determine if the existing aeration tanks can be modified and
if the wastewater characteristics are suitable to accommodate a biological
phosphorus process. An important aspects of the evaluation will be the impact
of sidestream loadings and solids handling practices on the process. The study
would determine po[ential benefits and problems associated with the process.
The purpose of the study is to determine if a biological phosphorus process is
suitable for use at the Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant. If the pzocecs is
s�itable, further study would be needed to determine if it would be
cost-effective [o implement the process.
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 3
- 17g -
RESOLUTION #210
Project Management and Schedule
As the study progresses, we will periodically meet with the City staff to
discuss the findings. At the end of the study a ceport will be prepared and
presented to the City that will detail the findings and recommendations. This
report aill serve as the basis for the detailed design and would be submitted to
the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) with the plans and
specifications as justification for the alternatives selected. The project
schedule calls for the work to be authorized in July of 1986 and a dcaft of the
study to be submitted to the City by November 1, 1986.
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 3
- 17h -
RESOLUTION #210
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF OSEIICOSH
SCOPE OP ENGINEERING SERVICES
JULY 15, 1966
The work performed under this contract for engineering services is divided
into two parts. Part Bl is the aeration system evaluation and Part B2 is the
biological phosphorus removal process evaluation.
PART B1--AERATION SYSTEM EVALUATION
The work for Part B1 Aeration System Evaluation consists of the following
tasks:
Task 1--Data Collection. The Engineer shall collect existing information
and data relative to the design and operation of the Oshkosh Wastewater
Treatment Plant. This includes such items as reports, studies, evaluations,
plans and specifications, accurate as-built drawings, operating and laboratory
data, electric rate schedule, operation and maintenance manual, operating and
laboratory data, and budgets.
Task 2--Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The Engineer shall
review the arrangement and operation and performance of the existing wastewater
treatment facilities to determine the characteristics of the existing aeration
equipment and the suitability of the facilities for the proposed fine bubble
aeration alternatives.
Task 3--Wastewater Characteristics. The Engineer shall review the avail-
able monitoring data and develop flows and loading for design of alternative
systems. The characteristics of the wastewater shall be evaluated to detecmine
the impact on the performance of the fine bubble aeration alternatives.
Task 4--Development of Alternatives. The Engineer shall prepare a prelim-
inary design for a fine bubble ceramic disc aeration system and a flexible tube
fine bubble aeration system complete with dissolved oxygen control system and
blower system. The capital and operating cost for each system will be
estimated. �
Task S--Comparison of Alternatives. The Engineec shall compare the present
aeration system with the two fine bubble aeration systems. The comparison will
include capital costs, operating costs, and noneconomic factors. A present
aorth analysis will be used for the economic comparison. The most suitable plan
will be recommended.
Task 6--Report Preparation. The Engineer shall prepare a report that will
present the information developed in Task 1 through Task 5. Three copies of a
dcaft report will be submitted to the City for review and comments. Aftec
incorporation of any comments and changes, 20 copies of the final report will be
published and suitably bound.
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 2
- 17i -
RESOLUTION #210
Task 7--Project Management. The Engineer shall update the City staff as
the work progresses and shall present the results of the study to the City upon
completion of the final report. Upon acceptance by the City, the Engineer shall
submit three copies of the study for review and approval of the WDNR.
PART B2--BZOI.OGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESS EVALUATION
The wrork for Part B2 Biological Phosphorus Removal Process Evaluation
consists of the folloaing tasks:
Task 1--Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The Engineec shall review
the arrangement and opecation and performance of the existing wastevater
treatment facilities to determine theic suitability for the biological
phosphorus removal process. The ceview would include the liquid and solids
handling facilities.
Task 2--Wastewater Characteristics. The Engineer will review existing
monitoring data to determine design loads and to determine if the wastewater
characteristics are suitable for a biological phosphorus process. Character-
istics of importance are BOD, soluble BOD, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus,
and orthphosphorus of both the plant influent and sidestreams.
Task 3--Process Evaluation. The Engineer shall determine the potential
benefits and problems associated with implementing and using a biological
phosphocus removal process at the Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant. Based on
this evaluation, the Engineer will make a recommendation as to the suitability
of the biological phosphorus removal p=ocess.
Task 4--Report Preparation. The Engineer shall prepare a report that vill
present the information developed in Task 1 through Task 3. Three copies of a
draft report will be submitted to the City for ceview and comments. After
incorporation of any comments and changes, 20 copies of the final report vill be
published and suitably bound.
Task S--Project Management. The Engineer shall update the City staff as
the work progresses and shall present the results of the study to the City upon
completion of the final report. Upon acceptance by the City, the Engineer shall
submit three copies of the study for review and approval of the WDNR.
Exhibit B
_ 17� _ Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION #210
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF OSF3ROSH
COMPENSATION
JULY 15, 1986
Compensation for the services provided under Article II "Scope of En9ineer-
ing Services" and described in Exhibit B shall be as described in Part C1.
PART Cl METHOD OF COMPENSATION
Part Description
B1
�
AERATZON SYSTEM EVALUATION
BIOIAGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EVALUATION
PART C2 LUMP SUM COMPENSATION
Compensation
S 5,900 lump sum
S 3,600 lump sum
The lump sum amounts indicated in Part C1 shall be a firm fixed price that
shall only be modified if the scope of wotk changes. The En9ineers shall submit
periodic statements to the Owner in accordance with Section V of this Agreement.
Periodic billing shall be based upon percentage completion of the work as
determined by the Engineer and approved by the Owner.
PART C3 TIME AND EXPENSE COMPENSATZON
Compensation foc services performed on a time and e�cpense basis shall be
based on labor related costs plus direct nonlabor costs as described in this
exhibit.
C3.01 LABOR-RELATED COSTS
Labor-related costs comprise salary costs, general and administrative
overhead, and profit. Salary costs shall be the total number of hours worked on
the Project by each employee multiplied by the employee's hourly salary cost.
It is agreed that general and administrative overhead, and profit shall be
computed by multiplying salary costs by a factor of 0.85.
Salary costs shall inciude but are not limited to the following:
1. Salaries.
2. Workers compensation insurance.
3. State and federal unemployment insurance.
4
5
6
F]oployer contribution to Social Security.
Payroll taxes.
Long-term disability insurance.
- 17k -
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION #210
7. Life and medical insurance.
8. Vacation and holidays.
9. Incen[ive pay.
10. Retirement plan.
General and administrative overhead includes the following indirect
costs which are not identifiable a�d directly allocable to the Project:
1. Provisions for office, light, heat, and similar items foc working
space, depreciation allowance or cental for furniture, drafting equipment and
engineering instruments, automobile expenses, and office and drafting supplies.
2. Taxes and insurance other than those included as fringe benefits,
but excluding state and federal income taxes.
3. Libcary and periodical expense, and other means of keeping abreast
of advances in engineering, such as attendance at technical and professional
meetings.
4. FScecutive, administrative, accounting, legal, stenographic, and
clerical salaries and expenses, other than Project-identifiable salaries
included in labor-related costs and Project-related expenses incl�ded in
reimbursable nonlabor expenses, plus salaries or imputed salaries of principals,
to the extent that they perform genezal executive and administrative services as
distinguished from technical or advisory services directly applicable to the
Project. These services and expenses, essential to the conduct of the business,
include preliminary arran9ements fot new projects or assignments, and interest
on borrowed capital.
5. Business development expenses, including salaries of principals and
salary costs of employees so engaged.
6. Provision for loss of productive time of technical employees
between assignments and foc time of principals and employees on public interest
assignments.
Profit consists of state and federal income taxes and net profit.
C3.02 NONLABOR COSTS
Nonlabor costs are charges incurred directly for the Project, other
than those included in labor-related costs. Such nonlabor costs shall be
computed on the basis of actual purchase price plus a service charge of 10
percent. Cost of items and services provided by the Engineer shall be in
accordance with rate schedules based on normal charges of commeccial sources.
Nonlabor items and services include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Services directly applicable to the Project such as special legal
and accounting expenses, computer rental and programming costs, special
consultants, borings, laboratory analyses, commerciai printing and binding, and
similar secvices that are not applicable to general overhead.
Exhibit C
Page 2 of 3
- 171 -
RESOLUTION #210
Z. Identifiable reproduction aervices applicable to the pcoject such
as printing of drawings, photostating, multilithing, printing, and similar
services.
3. Identifiable communication services such as long-distance
telephone, telecopying, telegraph, cable, express services, and postage other
than for general cocrespondence.
4. Living and traveling expenses of employees when away from home
office on business connected with the Project.
5. Subcontracted services.
C3.03 LIMITATION OF COST AND TIME
For time and expense compensation the Engineer agrees to use his best
efforts to perform the work within the estimated cost and time of completion.
If, at any time, the Engineer has reason to believe that the cost will be
greatec than estimated, the Engineer shall notify the Owner in writing to that
effect. The notification will state the revised cost estimate for performance
of the services and, if applicable, the revised time for completion. Such
notification will be submi[ted to the Owner at the earliest possible date and in
no event later than 15 days prior to scheduled completion of the work.
The Owner shall not be obligated to reimburse the Engineer for costs
incurred in excess of the estimated cost. The Engineer shall not be obligated
to continue performance under this Agreement or otherwise incur costs in excess
of the estimated cost unless and until the Owner shall have �otified the
Engineer in Writing that such estimated cost has been increased and shall have
specified in such notice a revised estimated cost which shall thereupon
constitute the estimated cost for performance of this Agreement.
if, after such notification, additional funds are not allotted by the
end of the period scheduled for completion, or an agreed date substituted
therefor, the Owner will, upon written request by the Engineer, terminate this
Agreement. The terminatio❑ date shall be the ociginally scheduled completion
date or an agreed date substituted thezefor.
C3.04 PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION
Charges determined on the basis of this Exhibit shall be billed in
accordance with Article V of this Agreement.
Fxhibit C
Page 3 of 3
- 17m -
�
�
�-, ��
F'• { C
� � �
n �t
� � V
fD •� +
F �`� �
�
��
rn
�
c� 3
D O
A �
A �
�o
m z
p ..
n
<o
m v
N �
�
.
-�na �
Z N � N
N � -o �n
d a �
,+ �+ o
� �-'� < �k
(D O (D N
� 7
c+ m o
a �
v rr in
�
w rr �
� � �
rr tp tp
�
� ��
a � ��7
fi� �
m n ,
E�
h N ���
�
7
c'f