The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987-Building (deck addition) c ';r , /� CITY OF OSHKOSH N° 05478 �' PERMIT - APPLICATION AND RECORD TYPE: BLDC�TG ❑ ELEC ❑ PLBG ❑ SIGN ❑ ZONWG r` � � FLOOD PLAIN�'^� HEIGHT� ADDRESS ��~` ,✓ . ��s <<�� PLAN NO. �� OWNER �-° ` DESIGNER /� ,�/' r ,, USE/NATURE OF WORK � �� /� �"� a / X (U �°t'` � i Q f' �- BUILDING CONl'RACTOR �W�� fi �/ Size x � Sq. Ft. # Rooms # Stories Height �? -1$ Foundation- ��S� Class of Const. g Occupancy Permit Z��°�� HEATING CONTRACTOR Heat ❑ A/C ❑ Vent ❑ Fuel/System Heat Loss BTU'S ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR t Electric Serv. New ❑ Change ❑ Temp ❑ Type Volts Amps � Fixtures Switches Receptacles Circuits PLUMBING CONTRACTOR —BT _WH —Disp ~ —WSoft —CBasin —Lav Sh _DW —DF San. Sewer _WC FDr SP Ur Storm Sewer —Sink _LTub _Eject SS —Water Other no FEES: Valuation $ P Fee Paid $ ��• Park Dedication $ ISSUED BY Date �� 7� � � Final/O.P. �a�� In the performance of this wor I agree t perform all work pursuant to rules governing the described construction. SIGNATURE � t D � GENT/OWNER D E � � ADDRESS � �ilJ� = ✓�y�-,d��✓-� Gt/� ��'y%�.�-�r'OS�4 ��v/ TELEPHONE# � ` �' e ( �OtJ�/.a j�1l,$' � � �J.GD � ��'�A�7'� 1__ i i '`�i ��'� �O : - -- , � a I -- -- ---_ L- -- . ---- --- --- ---- - ----- --- , __ __ __--- . _ __-- � ---- - -- -- --_ � ---- --- ---- - - - _--- ----- ---- --- -- --. _ _ _ l - -- - , y ---- --- — -- . a --- - -- ---- - _ --- -- ___ . - - — - - -- _ -� _"Z Z� - ----- -- ---- -- -- —-- -- --- � _ -- ---- � — � � � __ 1-- � - - ; \` - -- - - _ � = : —�- - ' - ; —- --- --- -�---- - _ _ - -- ------ - - — — --- f ; , � _ _ _— _ � _ _ - '� �� . . � , �c'� ' _ - - - - - : . . � � _-- - s _ _ _ . ,- '° , . 1— - ---_ , - _�; � _ ,_ �5 3 , . � - -- - - . ; ,� � � � � , �� : _ _ . _ , . _ _ , �- ,, , � � � � —- -- - -� -,`' -- - -----i} a _ - -- - _- -- `� : . . _ L4i _ _.___-_._ ___-__-_ Y •� � F - - i - -- - �; � � � Q � , � _�`�a` � , �� _ --- 1- �� a _ I _ _ ___ y £ � � _ _ __ _ � � � , � �-,� _ � _ _t,� 1 � . _ ____ _ _ ___ �, _ _ � ___ � __ - _ , � __ ___ _ ___ .� �_ -� _ __ _ __ __ _ ___ __ _ _ : � ; �. ; � � � - - —_ - --__ � � � .� -- �� - - _- -. � _ _- - ---- ---- - � � - �' j _ - _ � _- - r �� - - - -- �� - --- - _ _ � � � E -- i � -- -- —_ - - --- � - : - —_- � , - -- _ ---- _ ,---- _ � _ � � . E__- � _ - - - � _ _ � _ f_ . ---- � i ( � } - - -- -- - I -- , --- --- -----�-- �-- --� ---- _�--- -- - - --- - - . , � � -- � � � � ' -�--- --- - - - ; , --- --- t ; ; 3 -- -- � , . -- - --- - -- - � -t---- - -- - -- --- , , , .. - - -- ---1_ _-- - -- - - -- -- -- - - ----- -_ _ - -__ :_- f -- - -- ; --- ---- — T--- -- - f - ------ — ---- - -- - - - -- - -'--- i I � ' � l � —I --- I I - - --- -- - I � I � � i I I � ; �-.1 ' i ' � � ' �� - , � � � . � , � BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PAGE THREE SEPTEMBER 16, 1937 MINUTES MEETING Mr. Ron Mathwig, contractor for the Bleichwehls, stated the lot they have decided to build on is irregularly shaped. A surveyor discovered that because of the odd shape of the lot we were not meeting the City's setback requirements in two locations. The Bleichwehls feel it is important to keep the garages the size proposed because of the rental property. There are a lot of multiple family structures in this area. It will not hurt anything. Mr. Bleichwehl stated this was totally unintentional and we did not discover this until the property was surveyed. Also the garage on the east becomes very limited in its use if it had to be 172 ft. on one side. For some people it would be hard to use a garage that size. Mr. McGee stated for clarification the portion of the building that stems closest to the corner is garage area. Mr. Mathwig stated none of the actual house requires a variance. Mr. Nitkowski stated we speak alot about uniqueness of land. This seems to be a situation where we need to grant a variance because of the configuration of the I lot. A homeowner has a right to a garage. Mr. McGee stated relative to the proposed future street (Alexandra Court) the house would line up with the 25 ft. setback. Relative to 18th Avenue this structure will be about 212 ft. ahead of the other neighbors down the road. Mr. Lamine stated the impression is that the majority of the structure will meet the 25 ft. setback area. Because of the fact that it is a curvilinear design it creates an unusual situation for that lot. I don't think it would have a negative impact. Motion by Nitkowski to move approval of a variance to construct a duplex with a 22.37 ft. front yard setback from Alexandra Court and a 22.54 front yard setback from W. 18th Avenue. Seconded by Neu. Motion carried 5-0. Regarding the findings of fact, Mr. Nitkowski stated it would ap�ear that this situation is unique with the configuration of the lot being such that there is no other alternative for the landowner to construct a garage. To deprive him of that would be a hardship. Also no negative impact would occur to the adjacent property owners along with no other saf ety hazards. Mr. McGee stated it meets the spirit of 25 ft. setbacks. III. 251 N. WESTFIELD STREET - James D. Hepola Mr. Lamine explained the applicant is requesting a variance to construct a deck with a 3 ft. 8 in. side yard setback; whereas the Ordinance requires a 7� ft. minimum side yard setback. Mr. Hepola stated when we built this deck we got a little enthusiastic about putting the deck around the tree. I will gladly remove the portion around the tree if no one appears to object. Mr. Hepola submitted a letter from neighbors who do not object to the deck. � BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS • PAGE FOUR SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 MINUTES MEETING Mr. Lamine stated the neighbor who filed the complaint does not want the Hepolas to have a deck at all. Mr. McGee stated that it appears that the deck in question is the part that 2ncircles around the tree. Mre Neu asked if the Hepolas had any future plans to enclose the deck at all. Mr. Hepola replied no. The difficulty came in being a corner lot and it was thought the deck was in the back yard. Mr. Lamine stated the Board has denied other similar variance requests. Mr. Hepola stated it will cost a lot to change the deck and it will change the looks of the back yard. Mr. Nitkowski asked if an architect designed this deck. Mr. Hepola replied no, we did it ourselves. Mr. Lamine stated the problem is where the deck goes around the tree. Motiou by Krueger to move approval of a variance to construct a deck with a 3 ft. 8 in. side yard setback. Seconded by Hintz. Motion denied 2-3. (Hintz, Nitkowski) Regarding the findings of fact, Ms. Hintz stated (for the affirmative) the neighbors support is behind the Hepolas and because of the aesthetic improvement. Mr. Nitkowski stated their actions were based on the reliance of the contractor (friend) and there was no negative impact. Mr. Krueger stated there was no hardship proven which is the basis on which we base our decisions on. Mr. McGee stated if we had to prove this decision it would be hard to prove the affirmative vote. IV. 2853 STONY BEACH AVENUE - Clayton Georgeson Mr. Lamine explained the applicant is requesting a variance to create two sub- standard sized lots and to construct a garage on a vacant lot. The Ordinance requires 60 ft. wide and 7200 sq. ft. for new lot creations and does not permit the construction of an accessory structure without a principal structure present or under construction. It also requires a 60 ft. minimum front yard setback, a 25 ft. minimum rear yard setback and a 7� ft. minimum side yard setback. Mr. Bruce Roskom, City Planner, appeared on behalf of the City's involvement in this issue. He stated that over the years that parcel was used as a driveway for cars to circulate around. After the property was annexed the new property owner exercised his right to close that off to the public. Mr. Roskom further stated the City has a 25 ft. sewer easement along the subject property. We have acquired 30 ft. of that property to provide a right-of-way. Mr. Georgeson has agreed to sell us the 30 ft. if he can be provided with useable space. The garage is simpl_y what he intended to do with the property. Mr. Neu asked there is no question of the acquisition of land? Fe�. 12, i�88 �ames Hepola 251 N. Westfield St. : Oshkosh, WI 54901 CSETIFICATE OF OCCtTPANC�C An Occupancy Permit is hereby granted for tnP �Q�� a�,�;i i nn '�i.� thP rPs i rfPnrP loCated St i5� ra_ wP�tfiP�r� �t_ Oshkosh, Wisconsin as described in Bvilding Permit application numbers(s) �5�� . This hiiilr�tnn is to be used onl� as a �in�iP familv r�sidence and is in the R-1 Sinale Fami lv ResidenrA District. LIMITATIONS: Mazimum floor loading: Forty poun�s per square foot live ioad Maaimum nvmber oP persons and/or living units: one living unit NOTE: A new Certificate of Occupancy shall be required prior to occupancy, should additional building(s) be erected, or should any buildings mentioned above be altered or moved. The use of land, or buildings shall not be chan3ed until a Certif�cate of Occuuancy ts issved for that occupar.cy. BUIiDING INSPECT08