The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About35735 / 90-510 w- February 15, 1990 #510 RESOLUTION ( CARRIED LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN ) PURPOSE: ACCEPT AND APPROVE OSHKOSH SENIOR CENTER STUDY PHASE III INITIATED BY: AD HOC SENIORS CENTER STUDY COMMITTEE BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the Oshkosh Senior Center Study, Phase III dated November 7, Zg89, as prepared and recommended by the Ad Hoc Senior Center Study Committee is hereby accepted and approved. SU�t�,iT'..tED BY � �;r-;>>��,;;�;� �� , __�__.____....._._.. - 16 - � � � � � OSHKOSH SENIOR CEI�IT ER � PHASE III � � � N�VEMBER 7 19 � 9 � � � � � � � � � � prepared by PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. � and THERN DESIGN CENTRE � � 1 , • � ' . I PHASE III . � Merritt and Jefferson Site � Analysis Budget Preliminary Drawings � � Knapp Street Site ( Analysis . Budget Preliminary Drawings � � Recommendation � . � � � � � � , � � � � � OSHKOSH SENIORS CENTER � - PHASE III � MERRiTT AND JEFFERSON SITE � � � From the Phase I Study we know that the existing Senior Center Facility is experiencing three basic problems. They are size, � identity, and parking. In the development of plans for the Merritt � and Jefferson site we have addressed these problems. � Included with this report is a floor plan, site plan, and building elevations for a proposed facility at the Merritt and Jefferson � site. � The floor plan, as in the Phase I Study, was developed based on � information obtained from the Focus Groups, questionnaires, center staff, city staff, research literature, and architectural and � planning experience. � The floor plan consists of 26,800 square feet, This is sli htl 9 Y � smaller than the total area of the Phase I solution, due primarily to the inefficiencies of remodeling in the existing portion of the � Phase I solution. � - 1 - � � . . � As with Phase I, the floor plan is based on analysis of current � � programs and planned and projected future programs. Also, included is an adult day care area which is not, as yet, a projected program � of the Senior Center. The plan, if fully implemented, would allow the Center to offer all programs "in-house. " � � Identity is not a problem with this solution since the facility is � a free standing building dedicated to senior use. Although it is � sited on the same block of land as the Library, there is a parking area separating the Senior Center from the Library. ' . � Parking is located primarily adjacent to the main entrance. The parking for the Senior Center is contiguous with the Library � parking. The site plan indicates 60 stalls dedicated to Senior Center parking. The remainder of the parking area would be shared � parking with the Library. The premise here is that, when an , � activity at the Senior Center would require more than 60 stalls, it would be at a time when the Library facilities are not in heavy � use. ' If this shared situation does not work, the city will obtain additional land for more parking. � � The site is layed out such that the secondary entrance to the east is adjacent to a van and bus drop off area. This eliminates � conflict with patrons who arrive by private automobile and park to the south of the building near the main entrance. This drop off � entrance is also very convenient to the adult day care area. ' - 2 - � � � • � � 1 The buildings exterior is designed to be in keeping with its urban setting and to blend with the design of the Library expansion. � � To construct the project as shown, it would be necessary to obtain land by condemnation and demolish seven or eight structures. The � site plan is laid out such that the original portion of the house at the corner of Merritt and Mt. Vernon Streets could be saved. � � This is a very handsome building and probably worth saving. We ' looked at possible integration of this structure with the new Senior Center. The only Senior Center use that it is suited for � is the office area. Since the office area needs to be very available to the center users and needs to have proximity to the ' activit areas for control, placing it on a level different from Y ' the remainder of the Center is not very functional. Therefore, if this house is maintained, we suggest that it be used by another � city agency for offices or perhaps as a child day care center where � seniors, who are able, could participate. � � The costs of the project are estimated to be as follows: ' Land Acquisition $ 635, 000. 00 � Relocation Costs 189, 000. 00 Demolition on Acquired Land 60 . 000. 00 � � ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF LAND $ 884,000 . 00 Building Construction (26, 800 SF @ $58/SF) 1, 555, 000. 00 � Site Improvements 65, 000. 00 , - 3 - � � � . . � Equipment & Furnishings 285, 000 . 00 (Assumes no equipment & furnishings reused � from exis�ing center and no donations of • equipment and furnishings) ' Fees: Architectural/Engineering 96, 000. 00 Contingency: 50 , 000. 00 ' TOTAL ESTIMATE: $2,935,000.00 tIt is apparent from the plans we have developed that the Merritt and Jefferson site does work for a new Senior Center Facility. All � of the problems of the existing Center can be solved at this site. � . The prime draw back to this site is the acquisition of land by tcondemnation and demolition of existing structures. There are both public relations and cost concerns in doing this. There is also ' a limited amount of open green area. and limits on further expansion � � without obtaining additional land. � There are a number of positive aspects to the Merritt and Jefferson � site. To build on this site would be an enhancement to the downtown area. It would place the facility in convenient proximity tto other major public facilities. Advantage is taken of the economics of shared parking. This site is also convenient to the � three public elderly housing facilities. Finally, a downtown location may also make its multi-purpose room more attractive for ' use b other rou s which would in turn benefit the Center Y g P � financially. ' - 4 - ' � � • � Considering the above analysis and given a facility equal to that � • proposed for the Knapp Street site and Marian Manor site, it would seem that the basic question is; "Do you want to benefit the down- � town area as you provide for the needs of the Seniors?" r � . � � � . . � � � � . . � � � � � � � . . ' - 5 - . � � F- W ? Z I_- W � N H H VZF- QZ O W ¢ p V � � Z Z ~ N Z , , N � --- -- --� 1�. N > Z a cn a a c=n N z o 3(1N3Atl NOIJNIHStlM p�, Y � W Z Z u, Z � H� N W li' a W ° N� O � � al-=- � N U W � a < � � i d i N y � � �.1 � �. � � � A Q � o � � � � � � � -- � � ' ' —� W U m .� ¢ � y O V �a � W m � —_ I H a J -- _ _ , � oo ; � � , , ! � �Z � ' a9 � ' � dm � � .; � �wo�. I ' ' i anNana ttiddaw �--- -- -- --� �--- � � , � � I � � U Z � Z W p tn W CL V Z F. F- F- p � � p U Z Zf' tA Z N c!1 > Z at� � ao c� w � y Z O O — W Z Z � o � W a � N U � ' � O ¢V � d < � � �� a � � � ; �� o: � � � ; � �: � � �� ► �� W � � � � � I � � � � 1 � � .e..o.. ....e.. � �� /�� M L \ � �� - � � � � � � � � • � ' , , , � 1 1 � 1 � 1 ' 1 , - 1 � ' ' � 1 1 � ` � � � � r----------- �� ' � ' � ---------------- � , X� � � � � � � ' � ; � � � , . , . . � � . , , � --------- ----� , � . _ , , � " ' � r--• r--• . i � � i ; t 9 � 9 � q ; �., � � 4 � i� � � �' ��` ` � I C ' , �� ------------ ' � ` � - � i ; � . � � , � � � , _ � � � � �: ; � � � , , { �, ` `' � � �� ,.,_ `� � � � ;� i � i �� - � � � - � � ' _:,,� � � � � j i '�;;_ ' w U F- w Z w ~ Up � WOWC tnQ �j aZ OWOWC VU Z � N Z � �' az ac��n � N y C7 w O � W U Z � W Y � tL �' Z � � N W W ¢ J = o. O � � s a i-' - - f - ; - - I I ' � 4 �� . �__"'f _��_� �u � � � � . � � �� i Z I � Z � o �:� o � .-=-� ° :.� o � W a ��---�� > � ~ ' > p � w I rt�zt � � = t W _�=-,� W � ue W ; ; � ��T �""q. �"�4 I� (~� � '� N= �� ,. ,i � o� a� o� W� � : I ,I � z W� I . �n 3i I '► I I� ,� ; � ' �i !� �- �� ; �; i � I � , _� ,i _ I ; �; �' � i, i � � { I` ;;� , � .. I - � � ,, �� , � � ;; ;) '��I, < <111! � � ; ; �!� `� i�,, i ' .1 � 1 � I i OSHKOSH SENIORS CENTER PHASE 111 KNAPP STREET SITE . Site Description a. Phvsical Size� 660 x 376 = 247 , 500 SF b. Site Development 1. Total site area 247 , 500 SF 2 . . Building Size 27 , 00o SF 3 . Drives and Parking (100 cars) 45, 500 SF 4 . Ratio of green space to construction areas 247, 500/72 , 500 = 3 . 4 to 1 c. Street Access 1. Bismark Street (extended) 2 . Foster Street 3 . Knapp Street d. Transportation 1. Private vehicles 2 . Walk-in 3 . Handi-van 4 . Public transit e. Pop,ulation Distribution Located nearly in the center of the growth area in the southwest quadrant as projected in the Mercy Medical Center -9- � ' � Report. � f. � Close Access to Sut�portive Facilities 1. Fox Valley Technical College � 2 . Neut Mercy Treatment Center 3 . Shopping malls � 4 . Grocery stores � 5 . Financial institutions 6. Service businesses � 7 . Fire protection 8 . Restaurants � 9. Evergreen Manor, Simeanna � 10. Parks and recreation g. Advantactes � 1. Center of growth 2 . Residential area � � 3 . Excellent access � 4 . Ample site for expansion 5. Provide green space for outdoor activities � 6. Level site for construction 7 . Quite, secure neighborhood � 8 . East access to parking � 9 . Cost efficient 10. No traffic congestion � h. Disadvanta ec�s 1. Recommend purchase of one residence � � 2 . Distance to YMCA and Library -10- � � � � 3 . Distance to Marian Ma nor � 4 . Core city image � COMMENTARY Knapp Street Site � Location, construction efficienc su y, pplementary costs, growth � center, access, identity, green space, and security all dictate strong consideration for the Knapp Street site. The 5 . 7 acre site � allows ample space for program expansion as well as space �for outdoor . activities. The access is unique with apportunities to � control ingress and egress with three s treets available; and from � a traffic flow pattern and construction stand point, the site rates an A+ rating. The only negative feature is the fact it is not in � the central core. Frankly, as professionals we do not view that as being a disadvantage for seniors and the community as a whole. � � The Buildinct Pronosal Floor Plan � The preliminary floor plan as submitted represents a combination of the basic Marian Manor expansion plus features of the Stevens � Point, Manitowoc, and Sun Prairie ce nters. We attempted to � simplify the construction by utilizing a compact rectilinear envelope. In doing so, the facilities become more accessible and � construction costs are reduced. In addition, maintenance and operational costs will be reduced. The building is readily � expandable. � -I1- � � � � . � Word of Caution: Both the Merritt & Jefferson plan and this � submittal have not been reviewed and critique by Sue Kreibich and her staff. In addition, Ithe committee members have not had an opportunity to express their opinions. We have Ithe basic ingredients for a functional program, Ibut not the finished product. ITo learn the approximate size of the various . rooms and facilities, each square is 8 ' by 8 ' . Therefore, as you count squares, the I � facility dimensions begin to take form. I Architectural Facade I The selection of the contemporary colonial design was to blend with i the adjacent residential atmosphere of the site. We believe it would be very inappropriate in a downtown core site, but enhances I a neighbor pattern. Many people, young and old alike relate to a �, building they understand and a colonial style is ageless in its acceptance by the public. Warm, secure, and gracious describes the �- design and low profile accented by sloping roofs and gabled projections. �. �, Another advantage of the colonial theme is the placement of windows for natural light. Most seniors enjoy large windows and exterior (• exposure. The blend of bow windows and double-hung units allow -12- � I, i. � � � � � � more glass without becoming too commercial . The colonial design Iwould be carried through the interior with wall paneling, floor carpet, and vinyl covering. I As the plan develops further and the site selection is finalized; Ithe design selection can be made to enhance the site and Isurrounding structures. IProiected Proqram Cost • Total Building Area 27 , 000 SF IA. Construction Costs I � 1. General Construction @ $37 . 10 per SF $1, 001, 700. 00 2 . Heating & Air Conditioning @ $6. 25/SF 168 , 700. 00 I3 . Electrical & Fixtures @ $5. 10/SF 137 , 700. 00 4 . Communications @ $1. 80/SF 48 , 600. 00 I5. Plumbing & Waste @ $2 . 30/SF 62 , 100. 00 6. Painting & Wall Covering @ $2 . 20/SF 59 , 400 . 00 ( TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $54 .75/SF $1, 478, 200. 00 � B. Ancillarv Costs I` 7. Parking & Paving $ 54 , 800 . 00 8 . Site Development 25, 000. 00 I_ 9. Landscaping 40, 000 . 00 �, 10. Land Acquisition (1 Residence) 45, 000. 00 I_ -13- I . I, � � . � 11. Equipment & Furnishings (Allowance) 285 , 000 . 00 (Assumes no equipment & Furnishing reused � from existing center and no donations of equipment and furnishings) 12 . Professional Services 94 , 000 . 00 � 13 . Contingencies 20 , 000 . 00 � TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2, 042 , 000�00 � Note: The construction costs can be lowered approximately � • $22, 000. 00 via owner direct purchasing of major components. � � � � � � � � � � I • �. � -14- I ' t�fi•�ca�s�c� ��5 NIfNO�fIM 'V�y�(�VM Q ' +..09,,, „a,,,r,,,,,,,,, �'"i a 31 N 3� N�J 1 S 3 Q N Y 1N 1 � T1�1�]lro�y � � . ..__1 r �.i.n_■ a � �aa .or.�i�teuc• �---•-•-�- - 1 � � b lt. � J � n � ° M 1' rt o.c_ . � � � b • � � � � • � �� I � � 't � - • i � r - � . ' _ � � . . { _ � �FP • , � � � y � r � ' u I � b � < � � s � � I � • � � � � J (0) ^ • r . • o r ��a i ° • � • ■ � e i I � a e � � W :I � � � y�1C0� � ,m � �!/! � ; N ! � stiva ..� qn�asv/ � � � � . � � I 3 � ' • Y/ ; I. � �- 1� I . � �: � j ,� I I �j � I 'j i ' �. �. 1v � LM • n � �• I1n � J •1�• . � I I � I � - � � �..•.�•.. t�fc-�s[�s�u Qr� ��f�i NIfNO�fIM 'V�y�ny� ,.o,�,., „v� „ ,,,� ''"� a31N3� NJIS3ONYlM1 + 'n � �,�,�� $� ��i �'• �j'� ,� �';` (�>,� s��-C-:: a:.:l , � �,,:+,•,. `/� S•� �.:? �:� .' "a '�"��•',;7:�i�.•_.•.t i,r� "' .'' �: �;Y�-. . ,� �r;r-� Q. ►�r�-,y,,* ..,.. 1;��!� ' . -�ai �• ,.. , , �N3? *�.�,,. LL, V�%� _r / _;� • ' "_' -��.;.:'t'�'_ ' %• -: '� , e e •�:��' r �:.. �. � : • �.� ;i i'��,\•�'�"1:V, .ti�.��'!�=�l.�i'3 �:�15� :� ..' �•�..> ^� v !� 2 N�'i.� �3 �%Y,�`.' `_� �i ti 3':al�'��l�' =� �s �'f''� � ��i�` �''` �� '!�� '�� +i--- -- — — —— --' —— —— —' --�-- � 3 ,•.��f s�= }••� I j --- ...�-�-�---� -- - ---�-- --�r , ��:��' �•�� i i . �_�� 1 . � � I I ��.'f� .i-• '" I � V y��;+ � �:� I ; � • J ! _ �—Yei• � r . � � ' ! I ''-- �;.;� � � � � + " I � ` ` � ��"�-��a � � _� � _� ,M `w r' I � V 7„ �•M ' �.. � f p �� .'� ; � `.�� .� y' _ � � � � ' i �`' A� @ �;: � � �' o ; .. _,j . . �:I�� °� '" ' • _ :.�� . c} � • ".1� � I � I - I- ' j "•.��:� '� V I i . ,:� yl� , ; 1 � �." � � � E ��' ° � L i �-�.------- '.�': , , � �= •�r �---� � - ' � o _ I ��; I � ' - . � � I � � �: E� ( ��w � I � .-�, i _; � -' 'r ""=� ' � � y '�^w ( ' 1 . -3� • --:F� T� �T — — � ., ,� �, � � � � � _�:. I: - : . � � � � i � • � _ ' — o • � � I� , : ,' � , � ;� � .� . � ( ,,i�.' ,� I _;_ —{� :� ~r--,^--- ; , I I I h,, _� ,�.. !�Y c4- I � _ ' w '�-. . . .`� i . . � _ I _ . 1 iu•�� '�- ( .GI • ' ' 1--•.-� ~- —� _�� -{�� i\ , �� f ' _"a . I I . � � � •� � t �. � 1 . � i � I _� . ;y-:-+. T ._"„_1- �� _�� ' I I � � Q 1 I t I . . ''�"'� . --i--�`•r.Y� 'a . .�.,.r...� _ '_— •_r— � `'� �~'� C"" � _ �.�. _. „- ..._. �— _._ ��• -�. �7=;-.�_ — . � � �j . - � � � � __.TiLLIL� U�-� 'I � •=i! CL. •T� r•`I � I __- p - -- -�� -- -�.�f,+!- V ' : � �L.• ��: � �, _ ` ��- � .l• I I O �_. T_ �_'N �•r ','�-1- I - - ! _ � - ��` � � � �,:1" � - .�.� ' � � - • • - .T- - " _�"�' '• .._, . � � r i ' �. � I .a�� '',_.q " � ' i I ' ��— I —' � — � •'.'� • � ? L� � I I � I --,; � ; � : _ �� ;_ � �..:j� a, � • ? _�'wi I I ' _._ i�-- � ��- Tl'�� , -ti -- - • — — : : : :j r'"aj� ' • -- - - � � � •��' � � ��wyhl � ' . I __ —_ -�-�s.__�- —,:- --Z—�_.�_ --'-"-_ i � �,� 1� ' . � : � I-�:1 (� + Ir•1 ' O o �. ' _.-� ; .; .._:: \1 �'�{ � _ 1"1 � T � � i'' � 1I �=� � I I I � - _ ±� ; � � �-�_L"� •. --i— :.--L_�::� g � I „ t�z� -_=3— ' --I- -1- I � �=- �' =��-� �.: � _ ��;.�� I -� -*� � ° —--- •�- � -►-`�a.-.-�� ' ��= � _ � -- ! I + � � �' i � :ii�:::.�� i ��- � � � --� � +_ , � z �._ ' �. � - _- �. I-'Z' � . v��'V � :'t= i ; I i -=r�_ I � '�.',r:` j \: /� � 4—�--i--- •--�— !• � _I-�'' r� � ��:-T� --- � - -t---I- I ' _�-__ � __ ' I l, e 1 � � ,� _ l�,'•', ,�;-��_ ,��, i � __:---� �_ ; �� 1 L_ '�_ � .3 � _, . �• _1"' F -� �. ,.�� .�-r,;,, ;�%` ; < � �- •��14�`� '-: � _ f--.!_. � ��-. ,., r-i •• -� �%jl `=�z . c - � -- � i � . . �. � _ ;.�'•�. � ;, � • i;� •I.1 ••-?�� .:: � ----J• c �-C _ � �—�_ �_�` :_ � • 1 . �; r, } .... \� L_ _�J L. 'i-•:C-�: ' •� _. �\ � �. 1�j.. �__ , _ .. r. �_ :-'�� .:.�:��=;r= .ti' .t" i " •j�:�'`''� � b •�'��'�i i ,�1 r 1 _L-:C�� /' *�� ' i ! '`�=`4� `i��' '¢:�1�!``J, I �� 1 •� 4��f♦ ~� � '•�~ T C' L��r• � ' h-, �„J_r _ ./ y v'�`,J•- . �� T�1:'� r �. z'�' 1 � 4��1 �� -�"� • �� ,��r`�—��` �' - . .� ..rTS�, yr• jI� �' i l �LY �_ •��`'� { 1�.�J '� �I I -c.�1 "�r �:5" � "'4 ,/!� � ' t�?�'=-Lfi„ -�+"�i -�c.� 1,1�i! � -- I � . : ,�,_�. �� :1.��"�-;:,' - iYGll _ ' ' I '��- :��5 �` _ �r � ry�� ., �. � .:� � '��.` .I I: r �. s�.}' I ; :i, - .. y�.,:lt+ ' , ' � �i�~;" r• �-Y• - f - �i�.. J , ,� �` : a �l,� �' � � �' ' � ' I � . •� � i :�_.-» ,':; �. - t �: - � ��; ' r h ; ` � t - `I' �'•� � i � �`p`� .I� '_—� .'�/ r, { ,�� I ' =f�t � .1 � � !� Ij � �� ' ly: �„ - - �� ' : ,s �� `�,��';� � F � � "i 'I:;�,i i�� ' , � f � ?. �r_ 'i } '� �iii ' � ,"�. ; � ,r 'I� II t+�'�:�� `� ' � 'ni�h` ,.'� � � ' 4 �� i. ;�.� ` � ''�� ,�(j� ' ' f �� V- I �� I � ��', f � f �� . / � ^� � t ,j :i F�3� � �� . •_�? �I ,II�;;�t= � �'jr��.�. '�,,;(� _ 'c . il ;f I' �'-' Y ' � I py^_�� . �� a �,- , ,�; ,rl''j, � v�,�- �'i� � �il•� '-) . ;� ' j� �� • '� � ti '� �;,= _ _i��;; ��'- - . ;� '`' '� I - � .. . ._ ..:.�, �� .�� -� _�;''��,� �� ,.,�,a�� , ` � �� .�j:�_ �,.: s ; �.�;�, I � �_ { '�•'�n�'��y�-� =n�-�-, �I � �� ` R. � ' � '��'r;Stt< ^^t�`7.iy `�``� '"� �`:;� ''I�_�� :.;`''�'�•;�"�a�d; ��,.'-�'`*_ . n . I ..� 'v�'�+Z,�.L �'C '?�5� ` 1.IST,�,•W. ��M� •1;�1� Q r �,^�T.r�,,;•� :�ti• �. �i`` ° ' ��f��•.�'��'"�1�•jJ� �' ,� � .: J � r„1� �5.�1 � , ' .,•.'�t�y�. . '`f--i�l� -�lr i��_{. �e�-,,. f� ',/f��i'Y� � •"^- . ; �. t'.�... �,=, 1 r •.. �„ .•\^R_ v� ..:„.� � �•� � �� I � . � ' :� 1��'� t ti_�.�%,.�-1,�}, 1�.� i 7 � �n � .�� ,,.. • �z,7'�ct , � '/1 � i . ; i:-�� `•.;L; ��i... . ..:� r� ` -. . ,�. � �`�'.�:��r� i. . r'`�'y`� y _ � 7; �1''+ ._��,^"��' .�' . ..� � x ��' -�'� I � '�� . ' „ , ":;�`_ '�:�,�.;�. �f,b� ' ' � '� Y:�¢�-:. I i l . �. ^1� h ~I� t..� . �i^-,1�1 ,'�,.� L— I , . :`,�;' , �t ''' �.:v�;?��____.�x I �' ' 1 �11�.'�� ..�.. . i ` tiY J��_.3�'- � .' . -a :i�:t�-'?-�:.-:fi ,,;� '�� y, 1:i . i` ,. ?� . ,.. ;; ai . RECOMMENDATIONS We sincerely believe that of the dozen or more sites that have been considered, none are equal to the Knapp Street site of the intended - a new Oshkosh Senior Center. Therefore, we recommend that the committee finalize the selection of the site to allow the program to advance. We further recommend the Knapp Street site as the final selection based upon the cost, the location, and the availability. It can truly be a facility for all to enjoy, located in the prime growth area an readily accessible. In reviewing the two final site options, the Knapp Street site is clearly superior for a Senior Center. Respectfully Submitted, Thern Design Centre, Inc. Planning Associates, Inc. -18- Annual Operating/Maintenance Costs Oshkosh Senior Citizen' s Center Building Area Approximately - 26000 Square Feet Low Energy Use Construction December 13, 1989 Item Annual Cost Electricity $11, 380.gH Water 375.00 Sewer 425.�0 Gas 8 ,235. 0� Custodian - 40 hr . week @ $9. 75/hr . ' with benefits 18 ,75g. 00 Building Maintenance/Repair 1,875. 0� Janitorial Supplies, Household etc. 1 ,68�.g� Total Building Operation Costs Per Annum $42,680.�0 Note: Costs include an Adult Day Care Facility. If Adult Day Care is not offered , reduce total building operating costs by 11.8 per cent. _; .'� c�3 'n c� D � D O CD (D C� CD � -I � � C� tn �C7 �--� _'S c+ (D • �-+ O C CD 'a m z n� -s c+ � o •• -s cn .. � cn szo <-+ o c � z � � cn a.� o -< o � � � m m o � (/) (n � -� � o -� l0 � < �O w N ^�I O cn �� CD O N � � '--� T. �--� O N � � N � �• O ` � � �= � w � A�� 4