The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0017134-Building (parking lot) � 1 • � � _ CITY OF OSHKOSH N° 17134 PERMIT APPLICATION AND RECORD TYPE: BLDC�,�HTG ❑ ELEC ❑ PLBG ❑ SIGN ❑ ZONING FLOOD PLAIN HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS��t7 /��_7 �� e PLAN NO. OWNER '—'o t�� a �- X L.�h.c� DESIGNER .--� USE/NATURE OF WORK �"' � � L°W �c— r� ; '� c ^G BUILDING CONTRACTO �E"ev� Size�O X��Sq. Ft. # Rooms # Stories Height Foundation ,�a �D�- Class of Const. Occupancy Permit�_ � HEATING CONTRACTOR - Heat ❑ A/C ❑ Vent ❑ Fuel/System Heat Loss BTU'S ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR Electric Serv. New ❑ Change ❑ Temp ❑ Type Volts Amps Fixtures Switches Receptacles Circuits �_ PLUMBING CONTRACTOR —BT _WH Disp —WSoft —CBasin —Lav —Sh _DW DF —San. Sewer —WC _FDr SP —Ur —Storm Sewer —Sink _LTub Eject —SS —Water Other / FEES: Valuation $ rmit e Paid $ � ^ Park Dedication $ �— ISSUED BY Date Final/O.P. In the performance of this work I agree to p or all work pursuant to rules governing the described construction. . � SIGNATURE - � �� /�l� COt,I-1 /( 2 � AGENT/OWNER DATE ADDRESS / /� 0 � ' / ��L'r� 2 3�-y9S� TELEPHONE# ' ' Revised: 8/89 . ' ZONING/LAND USE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST : JOB LOCATION: �� / '� -7��l ZONING: % PROPERTY OWNER/CONTRACTOR: � � � CONSTRUCTION DATA: NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITION ALTERATION PARKING LOT TYPE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: (i.e. fence, pool , sign, deck, etc. ) F ` COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST (Check only those applicable) COMPLIES DEFICIENT DEFICIENCY/COMMENTS v Use Lot Width Lot Area � Floodplain Front Yard Side Street (front yard) Rear Yard Side Yard (R) Side Yard (L) Parking Spaces � Building Area Lot Area Per Family Corner Lot Landscaping Transitional Yard Off-Street Loading Vision Clearance Height REVIEW AUTHORITY: �C.� �/� � � ��l�a � G��-f�'�Y/��'�-�y �C�/ ��d The Director of Community Development, or designee, must approve all plans, except the following: (1 ) Alterations or interior work when the use is conforming and when no change in use is proposed. (2) Maintenance items, e.g. siding, .windows, etc. , when the use is conforming and when no change is proposed. Instances where work complies with the above criteria, the permit can be reviewed by the Building Inspector without referral to the Director of Community Development, or designee. C/�PPROVED DENIED Plan Commission Action Required Variance(s) Required REVIEWED BY: DATE: Z � d � , '�;lii Hl,II 2t5 r�"r,.h �vc,,,�,�, P � B!7r 113� � Oshkpst, �N��sCOnsin S��oz.��a City of Oshkosh � January 30, 1990 � � � O.IHKOIH � ON THE WATER � Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 1760 W. 7th Avenue - � Oshkosh, WI 54901 RE: 1760 W. 7th Avenue � Dear Mr. Roehlig: On January 17 , 1990, the City of Oshkosh Board of Zoning Appeals approved the following variance(s) requested for the � property referred to above. To construct a parking lot with a 7 1/2 ft. side yard setback with the � condition that appropriate landscaping be placed along the lot line per Section 30-30 (D) (2) of the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance. According to Section 30-25 (B) of the City of Oshkosh Zoning � ordinance your variance(s) will expire on July 17, 1990 unless you have obtained a permit for the activity allowed by the variance(s) . If you fail to get a permit by this date, you must re-apply for a variance if �ou intend to go ahead with the � activity allowed by the variance. � : Buildinc� permits may be obtained from the Building Inspector' s � office in Room 205 of City Hall between the hours of 8 - 9 AM and 1 - 2 PM, Monday thru Friday, or call (414) 236-5050. If you have any questions, please contact me at (414) 236-5059 . � Sincerely, � CITY OF OSHKOSH �G' ' `� / � Bruce A. Roskom Principal Planner � � � � � � . BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES . � JAIVUARY 17, 1990 PRESENT: Scott McDonald, Kevin McGee, Gary Ruhl, Terry Slover � STAFF: Bruce A. Roskom, Principal Planner; Darlene Matulle, Recording Secretary � Chairman McGee called the meeting to order at 3:30 PM. Roll call was taken and � and a quorum declared present. Due to a four member Board, Mr. McGee informed the applicant that four affirmative votes would be required to approve a request. A 3-1 vote would be an automatic � lay over until the next meeting, and a 2-2 vote would be a denial. The minutes of January 3, 1990 were approved as distributed. � ! I. 1760 WEST 7TH AVENUE - Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, owner ; � � Tfie applicant is requesting a variance to construct a parking lot with a 7 1/2 ft. � side yard setback, whereas Section 30-29(B)(1)(c) of the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance requires a 25 ft. side yard setback. The property is zoned R-3 Multiple Dwelling. � In answering questions from the Board, Mr. Reinhard Roehlig, agent for Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, explained the following: The parking lot is existing � and was constructed in 1988 �ccording to existing regulations at that time. The contractor who did the paving had indicated that no permit was required. However, due to adjacent residential properties, transitional yard requirements � must be met, as well as a building permit obtained. There is no new additional parking being proposed, this issue just needs to be straightened out. It was also noted that the landscaping would be completed next spring along mutual lot lines. Shrubs will probably be p.lanted because most of the area is already � fenced and the Church does not want double fenced areas. Discussion ensued relative to height requirements for landscaping. � Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Ringe, 511 Lilac Street, stated they live to the rear of the church property, and as long as all codes are met, they support this request. � Motion by Slover to approve a variance for a 7 1/2 ft. side yard setback for the construction of a parking lot with the condition that appropriate land- scaping be placed along the lot line per Section 30-30(D)(2) nf the City of � Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance. Seconded by Ruhl. Motion carried 4-0. . Regardfng the findings of fact, McDonald stated the parking plan was approved � under the old guidelines and it would be unfair to deny the request because the applicant was caught in the middle of a change in guidelines and policies. As such, it appears the hardship is beyond the applicants control. � There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. spectfull s b tte : � / Bruce A. Roskom Principal Planner �