HomeMy WebLinkAbout01. 15-120
MARCH 24, 2015 15-120 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED___7-0_____LOST_______LAID OVER________WITHDRAWN_____)
PURPOSE: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF CITY OF
OSHKOSH CDBG 2015-2019 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND CDBG
2015 ACTION PLAN
INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved
WHEREAS, the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, is the development of viable urban
communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and
expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- to moderate-income;
and
WHEREAS, the City has developed a Consolidated Plan for the period from
2015-2019 that contains a housing and homeless needs assessment, housing market
analysis, an assessment of nonhousing community development needs, strategies,
priority needs and objectives, which ensures that the activities to be carried out meets
one of the national objectives of benefit to low- to moderate-income families; or aid in
the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or meet other community development
needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious
immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community; and
WHEREAS, the 2015 Annual Action Plan to implement the Consolidated Plan
has been developed to ensure that the activities to be carried out meet one of the
national objectives of benefit to low- and moderate-income families; or aid in the
prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or meet other community development
needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and
immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community; and
WHEREAS, the City developed the 2015 Action Plan and 2015-2019
Consolidated Plan and presented them at a neighborhood public hearing on March 12,
2015 and the Plan Commission on March 17, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has recommended approval of the 2015-2019
Consolidated Plan and 2015 Action Plan.
MARCH 24, 2015 15-120 RESOLUTION
CONT'D
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh, that the City of Oshkosh 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, on file at the City
Clerk's Office, is hereby adopted, contingent upon final approval by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Common Council of
the City of Oshkosh that the 2015 Action Plan is hereby approved contingent upon final
approval by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of the projected
funds and proposed projects, including any proposed acquisition projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager and appropriate staff are
hereby authorized and directed to file and execute the necessary documents and
assurances required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and
any and all additional information required.
�
JHK fH
oN nie w��n
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darlene Brandt
Grant Coordinator
DATE: March 19, 2015
RE: Approve and Authorize Submittal of City of Oshkosh CDBG 2015-2019
Consolidated Plan and CDBG 2015 Action Plan (Plan Commission
recommends approval)
BACKGROUND
Staff requests approval of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Action Plan for the Community
Development Block Grant Program (CDBG).
ANALYSIS
Consolidated Plan
Every five years, the City is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to prepare a five-year Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan serves the following
functions:
• Outlines participation levels during the preparation of plans;
• Acts as an application for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs;
• Serves as a strategy for carrying out HUD programs; and
• Provides an annual action plan, which provides a basis for assessing perFormance.
The Consolidated Plan describes the needs for housing assistance and non-housing community
development. The City of Oshkosh has prepared this Plan for prioritizing the allocation of housing and
other assistance monies that may become available from the federal government over a five-year
period from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2019.
This Plan establishes three basic goals for assistance to low and moderate income (LMI) persons:
First, to provide decent affordable housing; second, to provide a suitable living environment; and third,
to expand economic opportunities.
Assistance in Oshkosh will be directed primarily to low and moderate income census tracts and block
groups. Within these geographic areas, priority will be given to the following:
• Areas with higher density and areas with high concentrations of rental housing;
• Areas most significantly affected by foreclosure and housing abandonment;
• Priority areas identified in the City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan within LMI census tracts;
• Historic Districts, especially those with high levels of LMI households or slum and blight;
� Areas with an approved Neighborhood Revitalization Plan.
Funding is proposed to be provided for items such as homebuyer's assistance, owner-occupied and
rental housing rehabilitation, acquisition and/or demolition of slum and blight, lead-based paint
reduction, historic preservation, Fair Housing and Public Services.
2015 Annual Action Plan
Annually, the CDBG Action Plan is prepared to demonstrate how estimated federal funds from HUD
will be spent in the city. The 2015 Program Year begins May 1, 2015 and will end April 30, 2016. The
2015 allocation is $725,849 (see attached proposed budget). HUD regulations require that at least
70% of CDBG funds benefit LMI persons over a one to three year certification period. As proposed,
over 70% of the funds subject to LMI benefit calculations will be expended on activities that benefit
LMI persons.
Public Service applications (via the Consortium) are currently being evaluated by a 10-member
committee consisting of representatives from Oshkosh Area United Way, Oshkosh Area Community
Foundation, and the City of Oshkosh. Staff is recommending that the City allocate $85,000 for general
public services, similar to what has been done in the past. Public Service allocations can represent no
more than 15% of the total allocation.
Owner occupied housing improvement applications (non-public service) are due to the Community
Development Department on March 16. These applications do not include first time homebuyer's
assistance, emergency repairs or rehabilitation of rental properties. Non-Public Service allocations are
included in the 70% of CDBG funds for LMI persons. Staff is recommending that the City allocate
$379,500 for Housing Rehabilitation for owner occupied and rental units.
Remaining funding is recommended to be distributed to Central City Redevelopment for removal of
slum and blight ($50,000), Neighborhood Initiatives ($100,000), Fair Housing Activities ($14,500), and
Administration /Community Planning ($96,849).
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated. While the CDBG program does not require leveraging, the program does leverage
other resources with CDBG funds. The City budgets funds in the Capital Improvements Program for
additional programs for housing related activities (both owner occupied and rental), public facilities
improvements, landscaping, curb appeal projects and acquisition of properties to eliminate slum and
blight. All these programs/activities leverage additional tax dollars being brought into the City.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission made a determinafion of consistency at its March 17, 2015 meeting that the
proposed programs and activities in the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plan
are consistent with the City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planned
activities of the City.
Approved,
���
City Manager
ITEM: REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF 2015-2019 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
AND 2015 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Plan Commission meeting of March 17, 2015
BACKGROUND
Staff requests review and acceptance of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual
Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program.
The purpose of this review is far the Plan Commission to make a determination of consistency
for the proposed programs and activities in the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual
Action Plan with the City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planned
activities of the City.
ANALYSIS
Consolidated Plan
Every five years, the City is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) to prepare a five-year Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan serves the
following functions:
• outlines participation levels during the preparation of plans;
• acts as an application for federal funds under HLTD's formula grant programs;
• serves as a strategy for carrying out HUD programs; and
• provides an action plan, which provides a basis for assessing performance.
The Consolidated Plan describes the needs far housing assistance and non-housing community
development. The City of Oshkosh has prepared this Plan for prioritizing the allocation of
housing and other assistance monies that may become available from the federal government
over a five-year period from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2019
This Plan establishes three basic goals for assistance to low and moderate income (LMI) persons:
First, to provide decent affordable housing; second, to provide a suitable living environment; and
third,to expand economic opportunities.
Assistance in Oshkosh will be directed prirnarily to low and moderate income census tracts and
block groups.
Within these geographic areas,priority will be given to the following:
• Areas with higher density and areas with high concentrations of rental housing;
• Areas most significantly affected by foreclosure and housing abandonment;
• Priority areas identified in the City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan within LMI census
tracts;
• Historic Districts, especially those with high levels of LMI households or slum and blight.
• Areas with an approved Neighborhood Revitalization Plan.
Funding is proposed to be provided for items such as homebuyer's assistance, owner-occupied
and rental housing rehabilitation, demolition of slum and blight, lead-based paint abatement,
historic preservation, Fair Housing and Public Services.
2015 Annual Action Plan
Annually, the CDBG Action Plan is prepared to demonstrate how estimated federal funds from
HUD will be spent in the city. The 2015 Program Year begins May 1, 2015 and will end April
30, 2016. The 2015 allocation is $725,849 (see attached proposed budget). HUD regulations
require that at least 70% of CDBG funds benefit LMI persons over a one to three year
certification period. As proposed, over 70% of the funds subject to LMI benefit calculations will
be expended on activities that benefit LMI persons.
Public Service applications (via the Consortium) are currently being evaluated by a 10-member
committee consisting of representatives from Oshkosh Area United Way, Oshkosh Area
Community Foundation, and the City of Oshkosh. Staff is recommending that the City allocate
$85,000 for general public services, similar to what has been done in the past. Public Service
allocations can represent no more than 15% of the total allocation.
Owner occupied housing improvement applications (non-public service) are due to the
Community Development Department on March 16. These applications do not include first time
homebuyer's assistance, emergency repairs or rehabilitation of rental properties. Non-Public
Service allocations are included in the 70% of CDBG funds for LMI persons. Staff is
recommending that the City allocate $379,500 for Housing Rehabilitation far owner occupied
and rental units.
Remaining funding is recommended to be distributed to Central City Redevelopment for removal
of slum and blight($50,000),Neighborhood Initiatives ($100,000), Fair Housing Activities
($14,500), and Administration/Community Planning ($96,849).
Final Step
Prior to Council consideration, these plans are reviewed by the Plan Commission for consistency
with the City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, and other planned activities of the
City.
2
In this regard, staff has reviewed all proposed projects and activities and none have been
identified as being contrary to the Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planned activities
of the City.
RECOMMENDATIONS/CONDITIONS
Staff recommends acceptance of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plan
for the Community Development Block Grant Program, together with a finding that listed
projects are not in conflict with the City of Oshkosh Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed 2015 Action Plan Budget
Community Development Block Grant Program
PROJECTS 2015 Estimated
Allocation LMI Benefit
I. Central City Redevelopment& Community $50,000 $0
Facilities
II. Housing & Neighborhood Development $479,500 $479,500
III. Public Services
A. General Public Services/Consortium $85,000 $85,000
IV. Administration & Planning $96,849 $0
A. Fair Housing Center of Northeast WI 14 500 $0
Subtotal Admin & Planning $111,349 $0
Total $725,849 $564,500
The Plan Commission approved of the acceptance of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015
Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program. Together with a
3
finding that listed projects are not in conflict with the City of Oshkosh Comprehensive Plan. The
following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Ms. Brandt presented the item and explained the reason for the preparation of the Consolidated
Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) that outlines the goals of
the Ciry of Oshkosh's program which is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development(HUD). Projects funded by this program must meet one of three national
objectives which are to benefit low and moderate income (LMI)persons, prevention or
elimination of slum or blight, and urgent need. Projects also need to identify needs of LMI areas
and households, establishing priorities, and setting measurable goals. She discussed the
geographic priorities within LMI census tracts and displayed maps depicting the housing
structures built within census tracts, LMI census block groups, and areas containing a
neighborhood association. She discussed the various areas that would qualify as geographic
priorities and priority housing needs by household type. She also discussed factors that affect
older homes and reviewed the primary planned uses of funds such as owner occupied and rental
housing rehabilitation, lead paint abatement,targeted neighborhood improvement and
stabilization, removal of blight, redevelopment, first time homebuyers' assistance, and public
service programs and projects.
Mr. Fojtik opened the public hearing.
Mr. Borsuk stated that he understood that there were targeted areas but was questioning if any
consideration was given to scattered site housing.
Ms. Brandt responded that the City considers various areas but the homes that receive assistance
have to meet the guidelines and property owners must meet the LMI income limits. She further
explained the collaboration between other agencies such as Habitat for Humanity,
NeighborWorks, and Advocap.
Mr. Buck added that funds are starting to be utilized in areas with neighborhood plans in place
but HUD guidelines limit where the funds provided can be spent.
Ms. Brandt added that income limits are a qualifying factor for work and can be performed for
LMI individuals or households that may not necessarily be in a LMI area.
Mr. Gray commented that federal regulations are very confusing and hard to deal with and
questioned if on page 16 of the plan, table 5, the median income is the same as area median
income.
Ms. Brandt responded affirmatively.
Mr. Gray then commented on table 10 and questioned out of classifications, what are definite and
if they consider the size of households.
Ms. Brandt indicated that HUD populated the plan with pre-set data and she did not know how
small or large households were determined.
4
Ms. Brandt then moved on to the 2015 Proposed Action Plan which the City was allocated
$725,849 for this program year's funding. The CDBG funds are broken down into four major
categories which are central city development and community facilities, housing and
neighborhood development, public services, and administration and planning. She discussed the
use of last year's funds for slum and blight removal and reviewed photos of three homes that
were demolished. She also discussed housing and neighborhood development and reviewed
photos of rehabilitated homes. She discussed neighborhood development and reviewed photos of
the William Waters Plaza improvements that were completed last year and reviewed a table of
the 19 homes that were rehabilitated with program funds. She also reviewed public services that
are funded and reviewed the agencies that were recipients of assistance through CDBG funding.
She discussed administration and planning expenses which include the City and the Fair Housing
of Wisconsin agency. After Plan Commission review, the plan will be reviewed by the Common
Council and submitted to HUD by Apri18�".
Mr. Gray commented that category#2, the housing and neighborhood development, was getting
more benefit than the other categories as he felt the grant money should be used for LMI
purposes. He questioned if the Fair Housing Center received funding through both the public
services category as well as the administrative and planning category.
Ms. Brandt responded negatively and stated that the Fair Housing of Wisconsin agency is not
eligible for public service funding and receives funding under the administration and planning
category.
Mr. Gray stated that the public service breakout of funding should be put on the City's website.
Ms. Brandt indicated that the City and Public Service Consortium will not be ranking and
funding these sources until after all the applications have been received.
Mr.Nollenberger questioned if these plans were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as that
was the Plan Commission's responsibility in this matter.
Mr. Buck responded affirmatively and stated that this is taken into account when the plan is
prepared and it is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, especially
the housing element.
Allen Davis, Director of Community Development, stated that five years ago when he first
arrived in Oshkosh, the City receive around one million dollars per year and that we do not
receive the allocation we used to get from HUD to fund these projects.
As there was no one present from the public to comment, the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Vajgrt to approve the acceptance of 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 201 S
Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program.
Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 8-0.
5
� �r� �� � a�' �,�,��'�`,'��"C'r �., .
� �� ' ��s�a`a`� _ � ��; _ �`� .
� : : w.R�� �ayil'�✓ j y
�� � ���,,�K 9�� � ��� � .
- g,,ag �;;C ......,l y ....�.�,.,�, , .. . :
�n' �:_. ....-. �
2015-2019
�h= Proposed Consolidated Plan
�
��
�
�� s ���
,t
� �, f ,� �,�., �
, "; ;Y \����.J� \��."�9 ��'v��, '.
i �
1 :
Cc�r��unt�t�}�tr��€�pt�tent Block Grant (CDBG)
,Gi� _+� �,��'�x:_ � .�i_ �' y�'' y��� {�'(� : 1n� ,/w`'
/\�. � f'��l'4�df�'� r��� 9/ ���i��Sl l� Y♦I
C ��f
N �5� � ��6
�'�'( ��°�� a'_f��� � ��J' ��a ��
{ ��,E ���� � ��V
?k°c��`l . f "� �q� .�� l //y� ��
w�3' � . �j�'�y ������:. € /l�':.
�� Y g$�3 �� �+ ��s E �
5����i� `F L�'d�,' '``e.. �y�' i �,�,\ .
�_,Pub�i� Meeting
�� � -��,� �����;��e�d�yri�/larch 24, 2015
��3.�,�yi ���i��. '����- :�i �
i i�,
y
tis��� %s�*� �
� �
m�,��'�. , ��a
�����r
� < „ ..,_, . ..... . ...
-�
Consolidated Plan
`� • Required every 5 years because Oshkosh is an Entitlement Community for
_= the CDBG Program(since 1976)
,,; • Projects must meet one of three national objectives:
"` - Benefit to low and moderate income(LMI)persons
�� - Prevention or elimination of slums or blight
;,
°` Urgent need(typically disasters and emergencies)
a��' • Plan Identifies:
� � - Needs of LMI areas
`"� - Needs of LMI households
� '�` - Establishes priorities
- Sets measurable goals
� • Addresses those needs with CDBG funds over a 5 year planning period
�` • Must be coordinated with the Housing Authority's 5 Year Plan and the
y City's 2005-2025 Comprehensive Plan
?.:: • Different from the Housing Authority's Plan because it must take into
account neighborhood,community development and economic
�� ,, development issues in addition to housing issues.
1
� � �.
� ' ���,�� ����� ��
�.. �,'�a�u
-'- �ay a��r €^i�' ^��
' "" now�,E�..�l�'....
i .r�:.',:.
�
� i Geographic Priorities
>
' Low to Moderate Income (LMI) Census Tracts
Y - Areas with higher concentrations of LMI
�� households
R�� ��
- Areas with increasing rates of foreclosure
- Areas with higher density and rental units
- Priority Areas identified in the City's 2005-2025
` Comprehensive Plan
- Historic Districts
:
- Neighborhood Associations
� � ;� - Blighted properties and areas
�
� -, ��-� ----
� 4 '.8 d"a""T I'�-'��' � ��^'_ ..'
� i ��� �
ti � �
���1.,: �.� � .
¢ . �x. ,T._���', 1.
7
�' j
�... �f�,. �V�"' y� ^ . ..
�. 6+d'
> i � �
ti 4� R ,
'^b}y � �.�
� � � I 3�
.u.d_'������,}r �.` �'� " �.�
�� r t t
�' �`�,�.., . �r� '� ' � !
i� I
t� � �'�S_ �,ti � i .
���A.h�� � ^•�� .• . . .
l� � �yy�, � (
���YJ �
% �Sl"q�•r/� ,!rv��.� .
,- 3fn� � ,h,;..;� . . . '"
-. ti�t� � .� ... � � .
r °�
� f f�,;.���-...._. ta
!i
� .a��.ios�� r � . $ , �ogand
�....
��`r � €�se. �. �an,,.a�;,:o+o °
L$ ' � � ��_i�c�wwnio
tI � ! , �� ...t�
� �II :�sv�-iMJ�t"AMxta«� :. . . .
'. Y14%{�7}Y.� 73i�' h.�i'�St
5e st N ( m4 *.� i � .. . � �
M.+M.+UUY �3 q MM N�ataiS v �^7C Y�L�S � � 4
� wirs.na.znm .NNbvsw� M:i'�wMt 's,�„(�'f_bu4Hry...Wl f
2
_ �._ . ____..� „ . ,,,,
_...1 ...... �
,..`.^� �. � '
s m J � ��
� � ��€
n E
'�E' —i ` (
"i, �--- °� --�,t .:I i „i �
i. - �. ..�..�
���s.� � t E�'l €
� , "
�3�4
��: �.. `� F ,�g � �
+i ' €��.���. � a�.^r''
�G ��W � t
�` t �'""° "`^'a 4 ..,-{�" d^ (
€
��� "�1 � t.�:- d.
� � �� s �
q °.11 [ i } _ i
t `
,������� � }i..�. W,.�.do` "", € .
i (
F:� e_�� ,� °,���itE�
� ,-
, ,f
k-€_{� ` � (r.«:a':.. I<=�
3""�' ���
'!z ` ;_ � `
—��� � - _�
��s �_tiE ��
� �� _ F
t � _
�.� �
� � � ` �'�� � '�� N r�r�sde�,:��
� ,. .. ».. y .� .�
� ����n�.�ss^.w���n, . ., ' ' .._. 5
_. i"�`. e��;.�«�;,a�,� ,.. , � _-:�. _ . . . :_..
,�,s'��s�,g��v.a�����.y e�'��e�'���i
�.
�W;. �' . .,�........ . ...... .::.:
Priority Housing Needs
By Household Type
��H • Extremely Low Income Households(income<30% MFI)
- 13%of households
�z - Elderly and Small Related renter and Elderly owner households most
numerous*
- Most severe housing problems
,;:�
�°' • Very Low Income Households(income 30-50%MFI)
�✓' - 15%of households
�:� .;; - Elderly and Small Related renter and owner households most numerous*
��,:'
� � � • Low(Moderate) Income Households(income 50-80%MFI)
"'' - 20%of households
- Elderly owner and Small Related renter and owner households most
numerous'
�:�
�
�; *Besides"All Other Households,"which include UWO student rentals
� � a:�
3
� �' 1 __ ys� u �
.� . � �.
1 T ',�m4 � ' �r
_; _ �. ��,_ '' za��o�r�t�r �� �.z�r�°`�.
,�.
., � �� � �
,
.
- 2000-2009 2,807 10%
,�.g..
__ � .
„� ° �.�,�.
��: 199U=�99� '3�19? ' 11.5°la '
_ c^� `40 °� �" �� �t
� � � ,. °� 19$0-1989 2,634 9.4%
�� '. ,,�
- �,..,�,98 �- :, � �- �97�-197� " 3,425 �Z.3°lo
��'� ° ��.
� �� �.��.�,Y�, 1960-1969 2,693 9.7%
f > .�L. .«7 sm�r.en..s,ilt �.
-,y +` � ;: �` �.a; ��a��,�:� �s�a���s �,��o �.sara
� �,�F ��,a
� _ � ,�A,�,,,, ; .. _. .;. ����.
� °�`` �,i� '�� � �,� 1940-1949 1,727 6.2%
i' ��� ��
S
�.��� 99 � ; _� �,.. � 19���arearli�r� ����8,675 - 3Q.9°lo .����
'� � . ��'•. ��� ;
�. I
�� „ `:� ! Total 27,880 100%
�._ �.w,�
, �.� �� .� ; ��
, . , �
Cdy O`OShKOSh � 20032013 ACS 5-Year Estimates
Media�Yezr Housing Stniccure 6uift by Census Tract
����
�� �
y� � �����
�����,�;:,, y,.
�� .
����
�.s
Primary Planned Uses of Funds
� .
:= • Owner Occupied and Rental Housing Rehabilitation
::
�._.. !'': • Lead Paint Reduction
�� ...
• Targeted Neighborhood Improvement and Stabilization
Activities
' • Removal of Slum & Biight
;
: • Redevelopment
• First Time Homebuyers Assistance Program
�� .,',< • Public Service Programs and Projects
���
��r
����� :'..
��✓
� '. '
��{� .'
��
4
� � a s���' . La
� �
a �s ,'� ��'.�� j
���� � ���
��i r � '
�
�� .. . ..�, . . . . .
y� _ .. , . . .
��� .
�� ��� 2015 Proposed Action Plan
� .a (May 1, 2015-April 30, 20'16)
�
e� �
� �
�� � � x ���� � � �
j j� � �' � � � �`��a�r�' � ;�.:
� � is.,r a., s+v�°'
��� �_��,����r��tt�n��ji�ev��t��i�i�ent Block Grant (CDBG)
��h��t�sh, WI
�
���� ��� �� � , � i �
��� ��� �
��'r ������ �. �",���
� r ��� � s
� ��t �€ �y �. �a�,�,�
��� � �,�'�,'��i `' a��, �'lf��'����
�3 fE �`�f �y$
���,�;� �����.� � r� ��'����� Hearing
< ��
�� y � ��� � � � �����te��l�����tlarch 24 2015
�� ,
3�3
�, , :
✓
'�'�s��': � r j�:
h �� E�: �
� �� � ��
� ... .. . . .. ..
�
r�� CDBG Program
��;
� �d-�* • 2015 Allocation - $725,849 + est. $25,000* Program
�
�;
Income
��:�,.�
����; • CDBG Divided into 4 Major Categories
- Central City Development & Community Facilities
- Housing and Neighborhood Development
��� - Public Services
- Administration and Planning
1 Q �'.
5
Central City Development &
Community Facilities
Est. 2015 Allocation - $50,000
�4 � i��'��i ' '
A ��� ����;, ��y4 � 4 i �
��� ,� �3��'H��R.e �.��9 �i'��'.
g � �E� Ifit,„.i
South Shore
RedevelopmentArea
� , �� �,, �
� ��� �� ��'�.� �
�e �,,. '.
�/�`� �� ����� s
�
�w�r�'m
rr
�#z:
�+ ',�° �
��i�Y'i t��r��f'��
"
�IIlY1w����i� �r� •
?�.;:, �
- --: 11
675 Jefferson Street 1845 Jefferson Street
l� a y��`f'
♦iK�.� pY,Y�I
I�ti
y,f4
li i'I �................ ..
V�
Central City
, ° ��
Properties Demolished � ��¢'� _ {'�
Last Program Year ��?
���
,
a s
�
�,w�x 3 ��,a,�i�
��,;� �' i I qil
�
�' , .. ,,,.�:�{rn,r+: ..
j �,�A I fil F��„�'�,^�! I
I
��� I��i I��
�= �'�
,�;
.:��:� ,2
6
Housing & Neighborhood
Develo ment
Est. 2015 Allocation: $479,500
+$25,000 Program Income*
, , ,__ _�
a�; �
ie 4 �,�� '+
�:a .
t` s�T
Before 802 Jefferson Street After
�� 1�
. � v,i E�
� �t1E � '`j�l���� :
'� IIIM :
.:�I��� `- i3� �
�III.���" tv
,������,. ����,d.[ �g,,
Before 106 Bay Street After 13
Neighborhood Development
� � , � � �
- y ,� ' �`�
;� �
'�-�'*' �,;� °� i�JW�"w�l�: ssn, � �� aaw � �'M'
� �' ..,��
,�,��� � II�VI�
+..,�""W ��lMM�M�iwMM±wii+
,.:,'.��.,�-w,� ��.
� t
� ��1�l��'�I� �i�ilauui
#�" �,
� �i�i . '�sffi` _ 'I'�.,i �w I �
� �a
�� u�
=X;
�
� �" .`�� � �d3
y..x y�,
�� 'i
�w,
IV ���,�,�w�17 ��
�:
� '�j�
,,. `
�
:£� ,� _�
� ���;, � w� �.��,:
,4
7
PY'2013 OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING
REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Completion Purchase Project #in House- LMI Census
Address Date Assistanee Lead Grant Cost hold Tractor Block
Group
412 W 9th Ave 10/11/13 $� $1 210 $15 361 3 x
27 Canniff Ct ��9��3 $� $1 355 $22 280 1
35 W NevadaAve 6/8/13 $0 $6,070 $�3 887 1
802 Jefferson St 3l12/13 $0 $23,163 � X
8 W Linwood Ave 4/13/13 $0 $18,471 6
1322 Winneba oAve 3/12/13 $0 $14,515 �
726 W 11th Ave 3/28/13 $0 $20,900 q X
410 W Sth Ave 12/8/13 $0 $25,270 �
1329 Central St 12/20/13 $0 $2,200 $12,000 �
222Pros ectAve 4/25/13 $0 $28,275 z X
924 W 11th Ave 12/5/13 $0 $450 $28,023 � X
122 W 14th Ave 4/10/14 $0 $25,215 z X
1231 Grand St 4/25/14 $0 $17,260 3 X
833 Bowen St 4/25/14 $0 $650 $16,045 2 X
1424 Hazel St 2/21/14 $0 $14,453 �
1717 Sheridan St 3/17/14 $0 $17,950 2
902ConcordiaAve 2/10/14 $0 $5,820 5 X
106 Ba St 4/25/14 $0 $14,370 g X
443 W South ParkAve 4/10/14 $0 $13,930 �
TOTALS SO E11,935 �q��gg 41 10
15
+ �
��� r
,' r
������������ � � :
����d����y, ',
:;
N k= Public Services
.�
�_;.
��
� ,;y; • Estimated Allocation $85,000
�_�r,�;.;
a
: • Maximum 15% of Annual Allocation
�` • Activities
- Public Service Consortium
�
, _�t�
������:�
�
,,
��� �:
�,_ !.
��
16
s
'PY 2013 PUBLIC SERVICE CONSORTIUM RECIPIENTS
CDBG Total %of program
Subrecipient funds Program funded with
Budget CDBG
ADVOCAP Bridges EmergencyAssistance o
Program $6,500 $98,407 6/o
Nutrition Program $10,000 $1,256,782 1%
ChristineAnn DomesticAbuse Services $10,000 $533,465 1%
Area Community Pantry $10,000 $388,541 2%
Day by Day Warming Shelter $3,500 $123,000 2%
UW-Oshkosh Living Healthy Community $�0,000 $375,400 2%
Clinic
Total Funds $50,000 $2,986,066
17
�.;,,.;.
�� � iyy.�
r,�,
Administration & Planning
• Estimated Allocation $111 ,349
K • Includes $14,500 for Fair Housing Center of
,
Northeast Wisconsin
• Maximum 20% of Annual Allocation
�
� '''
��
b r
.��V .:"�..
9
r 3/��,��� .,,5���,,,.�.� ,._%���
�� �. � ��"�� ��'��� :���3:
l.�......,�'�:;:
� ;,: Next Steps
f
�����
3�� • Common Council Review
��w
�.._..
��` = • Public comments accepted on the Plan until April 6, 2015
,� '�� • Draft 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015 Action Plan
on City's website
'•-: • Submission to HUD on April 8, 2015
,�'�
� �t� ;
��� ;:
a �.;c'
..i���_��:
10