Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16. 14-334 JULY 22, 2014 14-334 RESOLUTION (CARRIED__7-0_____LOST_______LAID OVER_______WITHDRAWN_______) PURPOSE: APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DOWNTOWN OVERLAY DISTRICT STANDARD MODIFICATION; 570 NORTH MAIN STREET/VARSITY CLUB INITIATED BY: J WEST RENTALS LLC PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Found consistent with standards set forth in Section 30-11(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and approved w/condition WHERAS, the applicant desires to make the following improvements/alterations to the front façade at 570 North Main Street: 1) Removal of existing double door entrance on the north and replace with a faux garage door. 2) Replacement of single door entrance on the south with a double door entrance. 3) Relocation of existing double wide awning from the north façade to the south façade. 4) Replacement of two-thirds of the exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) with glass storefront windows. AND WHERAS, the Plan Commission recommends approval of the above requested exceptions to the building design standards of the Downtown Overlay District. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a conditional use permit is hereby approved under Section 30-11 of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance for exceptions to the building design standards of the Downtown Overlay District as noted above, with the following condition: 1) The entire center façade area is redeveloped with full story spandrel glass or storefront glass tinted as to be opaque on that portion that abuts the kitchen. m QJHKOIH ON THE WATER TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Darryn Burich, Director of Planning Services 6 DATE: July 17, 2014 RE: Approve Conditional Use Permit Downtown Overlay Standard Modification; 570 North Main Street/Varsity Club (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) BACKGROUND The subject property is the location of the Varsity Club at 570 North Main Street just south of the corner of North Main Street and East Parkway Avenue. The single story brick building is historically known as the Gibson Auto Exchange and was originally an automobile showroom constructed in 1921. The front facade has been significantly altered over the past 93 years with the removal of the glass storefront and garage door, which have been replaced by an exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) facade with three small fixed windows and two modern entrances with awnings. The building is a contributing structure within the National and State Register of Historic Places - North Main Street Historic District (Listed in 1996). ANALYSIS In 2009 the Common Council adopted the Downtown Overlay District providing design standards to ensure protection of the historic structures in the downtown from inappropriate alterations and requiring major deviations to be addressed through the approval of a conditional use permit. The petitioner is proposing to remove the existing double door entrancelexit on the northern portion of the front building fagade due to interior remodeling and construct faux garage doors in its place in an attempt to replicate the historic garage doors. They are also proposing to remove the single door entrancelexit on the southern fagade and replace it with a double door handicapped accessible entrance. The two legal nonconforming signed awnings over each existing entrance are proposed to be removed with the relocation of the legal nonconforming double door signed awning to the south entrance. The final proposed renovation is to replace two - thirds of the existing EIFS facade with storefront glass leaving one -third with EIFS finish to block the view as it is the location of the kitchen. Staff had concerns with the drastic contrast between the two proposed exterior finishes and recommended that the entire fagade be replaced with storefront glass. The Landmarks Commission was consulted and reviewed the proposal and agreed that the most appropriate renovation would be to remove all of the EIFS and return the facade to glass. The petitioner agreed to remove all the EIFS and existing windows and utilize full story storefront glass windows provided the windows by the kitchen could be opaque to screen the interior kitchen operations. Staff believes the proposed improvements are a significant effort at appropriate renovation and the Plan Commission supported the recommendation of approval. FISCAL IMPACT None anticipated. RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission approved of this request at its July 1, 2014 meeting. Approved, City Manager ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE DOWNTOWN OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 574 NORTH MAIN STREET (VARSITY CLUB) Plan Commission meeting of July 1, 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant/ Owner: J West Rentals, LLC Action(s) Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for an exception to the building design standards of the Downtown Overlay District to remove an existing double door entrance, replace a single door entrance with a double -door entrance, relocate an existing signed awning and replace 2/3 of the exterior insulation and finishing system (E1FS) with glass windows and a faux garage door. Applicable Ordinance Provisions: Zoning Ordinance Sections 30- 27(C)(5) of the Downtown Overlay District's design standards require original doors and windows be restored to the original style if the facade is remodeled. Section 30- 27(C)(6) of the Downtown Overlay District's design standards require replacement windows to fit exactly in the original window openings and match the historic windows in size, shape, arrangement of panes and materials, and Section 30- 27(E)(7) limit signage on awnings to the valance only and not to exceed 80% of the width of the awning with a maximum of 8" letters. The Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria and guidelines for establishment and /or amendment of a Conditional Use Permit in Section 30 -11 (D). Background Information Property Location and Type: The subject property is a 0.34 acre parcel of land located at 570 North Main Street approximately 120 feet south of the corner of North Main Street and East Parkway Avenue. The single story brick building is historically known as the Gibson Auto Exchange and was originally an automobile showroom constructed in 1921 for Gibson Chevrolet and Automobile Agency. It is a Twentieth Century Commercial building with geometric ornament and parapet treatment suggesting the influence of the Art Deco period. In comparison to other car dealership buildings designed in this style, this design exhibits great integration of ornament and massing. The front facade has been significantly altered over the past 93 years with the removal of the glass window storefront and garage door, which have been replaced by an EIFS facade with three small fixed windows and two modern entrances with awnings. Even with the changes, it is .still considered a contributing structure within the National and State Register of Historic Places - North Main Street Historic District (Listed in 1996). Subject Site Exhtin Land Use ...' Zontn Commercial- Tavern and Restaurant C -3 DO Adjacent Land Use and Zoning Extslrn �flses` - Zo hr North Commercial- Retail C -3 DO South Commercial — Office & Service C -3 DO East Residential -- Mixed Density (across Jefferson) C -3 DO West Commercial- Supper Club Restaurant C -3 DO Comprehensive Plan Lind Use Recammerxdafaon ., Land Use 10 Year Land Use Recommendation Mixed Downtown 20 Year Land Use Recommendation Mixed Downtown ANALYSIS In 2009 the Common Council adopted a re -write of Zoning Ordinance Section 30 -27 Downtown Overlay District providing design standards to ensure protection of the historic structures in the downtown from inappropriate alterations. The stated purpose of the Ordinance is to "preserve and restore unique and historic buildings; ensure coordinated design of new and existing buildings, minimize adverse impacts on adjacent properties from buildings that may detract from the character and appearance of the district; protect vehicular and pedestrian movements throughout the area; and aid in improving the overall economic viability of the district." Major changes to the Downtown Overlay included design guidelines for new construction, additions, and facade rehabilitation projects; changes to allowable signage; and regulations on awnings /canopies. Other change involved incorporating some flexibility to allow minor ordinance variation to be approved by the Director of Community Development (or designee) but requires any major deviations from the Overlay requirements to be addressed through the Plan. Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Requested Improvements /Alteration Requiring CUP Exc�p #ion Proposed redevelopment of the front facade that does not meet the design standards and requires exception from the Plan Commission includes four proposed alterations: 1) Removal of the existing double door entrance and replace it with a faux garage door; 2) Replacement of a single door entrance with a double -door entrance; 3) Relocation of an existing signed awning; and 4) Replacement of 2/3 of the exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) with glass storefront windows. This report will focus on each aspect of the CUP exception request individually. Item: 570 N Main —CUP Exception to Design Stnds Removal of the Existing Main Entrance The first aspect of the proposal includes removal of the existing double door entrance /exit on the northern portion of the building fagade, which is currently black framed glass entryway with a arched awning advertising the business. Historically this was the location of an automobile garage service door used by Gibson Auto Exchange that was removed around 2002. The petitioner has indicated that the interior of the business will be remodeled and the area adjacent to the entrance will be repurposed as a dry storage space and a walk -in cooler for the bar/ restaurant thereby rendering a customer entrance /exit unnecessary and undesirable. To mitigate the loss of the entrance on the building's exterior and break up the resulting blank wall as well as to attempt to return this portion of the fagade to a semblance of its historic intent and look, the petitioner proposes to construct a nonfunctioning antique style faux garage door in place of the entrance. The faux doors would replicate the appearance of historic swing style garage doors that are proposed to be stained wood with a double set of windows lining the top. Staff understands the desire of the applicant to remove the double door entrance to the business as it would no longer be functioning and also that they desire to reuse it elsewhere on the building front and is encouraged that the proposal includes the addition of the faux historic garage doors. Unfortunately staff was unable to find any photographs of the original door when it was the Gibson Auto Exchange but research was conducted on typical automobile dealership garage /service doors of that era and it was discovered that both overhead and swing doors and the use of wood with windows for material were common (examples attached). Staff therefore supports the removal of the double door entrance with the addition of a faux garage door as proposed or modified to achieve the best historic reference as it is a valid attempt to restore the unique and historic character of the building and will not detract from the character and appearance of the district. Replacement of a Single Door Entrance with a Double Door Entrance The removal of the existing double door entrance /exit on the northern portion of the building fagade provides the opportunity for the petitioner to improve the remaining entrance on the southern portion of the fagade by relocating the double door entrance and making it the formal customer entrance to the establishment. The petitioner has indicated in their application that the southern entrance was the only Main Street customer entrance from the building's construction in 1921 until the northern entrance was created in 2002, so the improvement of this entrance would not be in conflict with the original structure's design. The remodel /relocation will turn the entry to the side (perpendicular to the walk) creating a vestibule that will include a ramp providing needed handicap accessibility to the establishment. Staff agrees that this change is not inconsistent with the building's character and will not detract from the character and appearance of the district. Staff also feels the inclusion of the handicap accessibility is a major improvement to the function and overall economic viability of the structure. Relocation of an Existing Awning with Si na e The building currently contains two signed awnings over each of the existing entrances. With the relocation of the northern double door entrance to the south, the petitioner also proposes to remove the awning over the southern entrance and replace it with the double door awning currently at the northern entrance. Both awnings are considered legal nonconforming (grandfathered) awnings as they contain advertising in locations and amounts that do not comply with current regulations that limit awning signage to valance of awnings only with a limitation of 80% coverage and a maximum Item. 570 NMain — CUP Exception to Design Surds of 8 inch lettering. The petitioner explains in the application that the awnings were purchased at a cost of approximately $10,000 and installed meeting Zoning Ordinance regulations in 2007, prior to adoption of the 2009 Downtown Overlay Design Standards taking affect. With the total costs of renovations to the building at approximately $35,000, the petitioner requests a variance to the regulations on awnings to allow the double door signed awning to be reused at the southern entrance as the awning was originally erected in compliance with codes, is in good condition, and the cost to have a new awning manufactured would drastically increase the rehabilitation costs. Staff understands the expense to replace a functional awning would be considerable and supports the variance request as the awning was installed in conformance with the code at the time and because the overall building will come closer to conformity as there will be only one nonconforming awning rather than the two that currently exist. It must be noted that when the relocated awning has run its functional lifespan that a new replacement will then need to meet with the Design Standards. Replacement of the Exterior Insulation and Finisbinst System (EIFS) with Glass Storefront Windows and a Faux Garage Door The portion of the proposed exterior renovation that will have the greatest impact is the changes to the building's Main Street facade. When constructed, the building's front consisted of the garage /service door on the north %4 of the facade, a set of four glass first floor storefront windows in the center 1/2 of the facade and the glass customer entrance on the southern ' /4 of the facade, each being separated with a vertical column element. The second story consisted of the ornamental brick parapet that exists to this day. Records are unavailable, but sometime in the 1980's the glass center section of the building was removed and replaced with an exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) and three fixed windows. In an effort to create a more inviting ambiance for customers both on the interior and exterior of the building, the petitioner is proposing to remove 213 of the existing Main Street EIFS facade that contain two of the windows and replace it with four panels of full story storefront glass. The petitioner has indicated that the addition of the glass will greatly help the front of the building look more as it did when it was the Gibson Auto Exchange. Staff is concerned that the remaining 1/3 of the exterior finish would remain EIFS with one window, which would be a sharp contrast to the other renovations and would not promote the restoration of the historic character of the building. It was indicated that the 213 area proposed to be replaced will provide light and visual access to the seating and bar area but that the preference of the petitioner is to keep the northern 113 wall area closed off from view as it is the location of the kitchen. In an attempt to mitigate the contrast that will be created between the two exterior finishes and to make the remaining EIFS more appealing, the applicant is proposing to add shutters that match the new garage door to the window and/or paint the remaining EIFS a darker, more natural brown color. Staff feels the exterior renovations proposed are much more appropriate and higher quality than the existing exterior and will greatly improve the exterior appearance of the Main Street facade and go a long way to restoring the original architectural context of the historic building, however there is concern that the disparity created by leaving 1/3 of the center portion of the building in a contrasting material and inconsistent style to the majority of the building facade will detract from the character of the building itself and possibly have a negative impact within the district for no other reason than it would appear as "piecemeal" or incomplete in appearance. The underlying question is whether the higher quality /more appropriate material ap rtial rehabilitation of the facade with such drastic contrast would be more desirable than a lesser quality /less appropriate but consistent and cohesive aesthetic? Item: 570 NMain —CUP Exception to Design Stnds 4 If the only two options are to retain the existing consistent facade OR allow the partial /inconsistent facade rehabilitation, staff's preference is to retain the existing consistent facade. However, it is suggested and recommended that the entire center facade area be full story storefront glass that is "blacked out "/heavily tinted as to be opaque on that portion that abuts the kitchen. This would allow the front facade to become extremely consistent with the historical architecture of the building, provide a consistent and cohesive fagade, and improve the character of the building as well as the appearance of the block and downtown district while still blocking visibility to the kitchen area within. RECOMMENDATION /CONDITIONS Staff believes the proposed improvements to the structure are a significant effort at appropriate renovation on the part of the owner /petitioner, who should be commended for his contribution to the restoration of the Downtown Business District. We recommend a finding that the proposed conditional use permit request for exceptions to the building design standards of the Downtown Overlay District is consistent with Sections 30 -11(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and are approved with the following condition: 1. The entire center facade area is redeveloped with full story spandrel glass or storefront glass tinted as to be opaque on that portion that abuts the kitchen. The Plan Commission approved of the conditional use permit as requested with conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item. Mr. Buck stated this is also contributing property within the North Main Street Historic District and was the site of Gibson Auto Exchange, which was constructed about 1921. The front facade has been significantly altered over the years, with the removal of glass window storefront and garage door and the placement of a double door entry, two awnings and an exterior insulation and finishing system first floor fagade with three fixed windows. Mr. Buck stated the applicant is proposing to remodel the interior with the area adjacent to the entrance being used for dry storage and a walk -in cooler for the existing bar/ restaurant. With the interior work, four exterior alterations /changes are being proposed that will require exceptions to the design standards. The four exterior changes include: 1) removal of the existing double door entrance on the north and replacing it with a faux wood garage door, which is consistent with garage service doors of that era; 2) Replacement of the single door entrance on the south with a double door entrance. This change will make these doors the only entrance to the business. Handicap accessibility improvements will also be included in this modification; 3) Relocation of an existing wide signed awning from the north entrance to the south entrance. With the relocation of the double door entrance to the south entrance, the petitioner proposes to move the awning from the north entrance to the south entrance, and remove the single door awning on the south; and 4) Replace two - thirds of the exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) with glass storefront windows. The original historic storefront consisted of a set of four full story glass windows separated from the rest of the building with vertical columns. The current storefront consists of 3 smaller square windows and the applicant proposes to remove 2 of the windows and install four windows that would be similar in design to the historic storefront look. One small square window is proposed to remain as this area is adjacent to the kitchen. Item: 570 N Main —CUP Exception to Destgn Stnds Regarding the doors, Mr. Buck felt the faux wood door on the north and the double door entrance on the south would greatly improve the looks of the exterior and bring it closer in looks to its original historic appearance. Regarding the awnings, Mr. Buck noted that both awnings are considered legal non - conforming. Removing the smaller of the awnings will bring the property closer to compliance. if approved, the double wide awning could be moved to the south entrance and retain a legal nonconforming status thereby requiring it to be removed or brought into compliance with the code if the awning were to be damaged or replaced in the future. Regarding the front window replacement, Mr. Buck expressed staffs opinion that unless all the exterior insulation and finishing system were removed in its entirety and the storefront windows installed across the center section of the building that, even though the new windows would be more historic in nature, that leaving one window surrounded by exterior insulation and finishing system would appear piecemeal or incomplete in appearance and that staff would recommend the center section of the facade remain as -is if not done comprehensively. Mr. Buck noted the Landmarks Commission reviewed the request and agree with staff s assessment of the improvements. The Landmarks Commission suggested that the owner contact Bergstrom's who may have a picture of the original Gibson Auto Exchange storefront, which might be helpful as the applicant makes the exterior improvements, especially the choice of the faux garage door. Mr. Borsuk inquired what is being done with the sign on the front? Mr. Buck replied that was not included as part of this request and that the sign would remain until the owner replaces it. Mr. Thorns stated staff is looking at the historic value of the property. The awnings and existing sign are not historic. With the improvements being made, could the existing sign be changed to what a 1920s style sign would have looked like? Mr. Buck stated it is possible; however, the applicant has not included the sign in the request that is currently before the flan Commission and as it is not being modified that it would remain legal nonconforming. Mr. Jeremy West, owner, stated he has decided to remove all the exterior insulation and finishing system with the three fixed windows on the front and replace with full front glass windows as long as the window by the kitchen area can be blacked out/opaque. Mr. Vajgrt inquired what the building's capacity was? Mr. West replied 300. He indicated he is working with Omnni Glass on the windows. He is not sure if there will be 4, 5 or 6 windows now, but the entire center section of the storefront will be glass windows. Motion by Vajgrt that the proposed exterior improvements request far exceptions to the building design standards of the Downtown Overlay District is approved with the following condition and is consistent with Section 30 -11(D) of the Zoning Ordinance: 1) The entire center facade area is redeveloped with full story spandrel glass or storefront glass tinted as to be opaque on that portion that abuts the Kitchen. Seconded by Propp. Motion carried 9 -0 Item: 570 NMain — CUP Exception to Design Sinds N '3 =}-d <. -gin 1U Lihv— I,, � I.@i 25;,! @, 1 —lit of � E l•y�'. : — ate— LL= LTTt Service Eiftra, AM IN - - J�n�5EF1lEE'j�. r I, i INS P. ISM IN ESS EX.. _ 9- ..kF�..u'ryp R'� - ..,,.,s a- "�. x. '". <•;u= �:+'L�.'i'SU- ,�'&� -�- �- .ti' -9`.1 �__L- ..�.... E'. .,. .. R T a• we r '�a,3yel ,t PJnCJ II , n, �r�mriT'rn��_ic� TMi_tn"irJ'E S1�IL1r!""L'"C':i,tr;m, i- ,+n- m;sla -.�'_ Y� 3- .`�.7 :`?1 wt IM 7 1 q J I •� lA t '� z 3,t 3�m -esc'� a }-a� •' r � � I . ,� _- ��"v�;Ycr3 ',�x' sl � a ;xF .�,. aka : ',i.�. sff k 3 4 h j[ 47-7, �l 7� • r APPLICANT INFORMATION fi c VJ City of Oshkosh Application ❑ Planned Development Review Conditional. Use Permit Review * *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK. ** SUBMIT TO: Dept. of Community Developma 215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130 PHONE: (920) 236 -5059 Petitioner: C e- 4 0, )t Date: "fir Petitioner's Address: T7_y � S' „� � _�ir . city: State: u-)r Zip: D/ o 1 Telephone #: (b OF) - I7.5^ Fax: ( ) Other Contact # or Email: Status of Petitioner (Please Check): Owner ❑ Petitioner's Signature (required): OWNER INFORMATION ❑ Tenant ❑ Prospective Buyer Date: Owner(s): _ < fi` (�v�f. G Date: �'f% Owners) Address: 574' AJ ° W " City: M K State: V Zip: S ge]f Telephone ##: (6 W) 6401 — 01 "7 Fax, ( ) Other Contact # or Email: W c5±' Ownership Status (Please Check): ?Individual ❑ Trust ❑ Partnership ❑ Corporation Property Owner Consent: (required) - Ey signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information nece s process this application. I also understand that all meeting elates are tentative and maybe postponed by the Planning Services Di 5p for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: SITE INFORMATION / Date: tr�7�f✓ Address/Location of Proposed Project: 61,t 5-70 Parcel No. Proposed Project Type: [ ! ' C-i �4 . Current Use of Property: ec r r �( / f t? t (%- C Zoning: Land Uses Surrounding'Site: North: 7 'tTtrr�� o r South: ►� East: 1,0 West: a., * *Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request. ➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. ➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE For more information please the City's website at vrvw.ei.oshkosh.wi.us/ConununitK_PevelopmentJPlanning.htm j, Staff M Date Rec'd "� i I am proposing four items to be changed to the front (west side) of my building. They are as follows: 1. Remove the existing double door entrance on the northwest corner of the building. The hallway that this entrance leads into is approximately 12'x 35'. This space has no other use except for an entrance /exit. We would like to close the door and use that walkway for dry storage for the bar /kitchen. In addition, install a 11'x 17' walk -in cooler in this area. We would be able to extend our serving area another 12' that would supply seating for 7 more patrons. This walkway has also served as a safety /security concern. Outside of a convex mirror, we are not able to view any events in this area. In closing this entrance, we would propose to build antique style garage doors that would adorn the exterior of the previous entrance. In doing this, I'm hoping to help the building look more as it did originally when it was built by Gibson Chevrolet. This entrance was a garage door entrance until approximately 2002. Though it would be non - functioning, it would look as though it is a functioning, antique garage door. 2. Change single doorway into a double door entrance. The existing southwest entrance is currently not handicap accessible. The new entrance would be remodeled to have the double doors moved to this entrance. A ramp would be constructed for handicap accessibility. This doorway was the only Main St. entrance from 1921 -2002. Making it the only Main St. entrance would work towards bringing the entrance back to the way it was originally. 3. Remove existing awning over southwest entrance and replace it with the double door awning that is currently attached above the northwest entrance. These awnings were built and installed in 2007 at a cost of $10,000. Total cost of renovations between exterior and interior work that I'm doing this summer will be approximately $35,000. 1 would prefer not to waste the $10,000 that has already been spent and also, can't afford to replace with another option. 4. Remove existing "stucco" style panels on 2/3 of west exterior of building. Replace with glass windows from Omni Glass. Proposing to keep.the 1/3 of stucco panels on north side of wall. That area behind the walls is my kitchen. While I try to keep a clean kitchen, I would prefer not to have a glass wall looking into the kitchen. The 2/3 glass wall will look into the existing seating and bar area. Adding glass windows will help create a more inviting look for customers. To make the existing 1/3 of stucco panels more appealing, I propose to add wood shutters that would match the antique garage doors. If adding shutters isn't acceptable, I would propose to paint the stucco in a darker, more natural brown. Adding the glass to the front of the building would greatly help the front of the building look more as it did when it was owned by Gibson Chevrolet (please see picture included). � � � &. ! \� : \ ©\ r«. mod.§ �� :\ � %« w e } F. _V I s - eS± nuum x not sus' — r z N is # K O a d k i Jm �1 d Kz's' E' E CUP-- DWNTWN OVERLAY EXCPTN ALBERT E BLESER GENE R /PATRICIA L WALKER 570 N MAIN ST 4989 WASHINGTON ST 568 JEFFERSON ST PC: 07 -01 -14 BUTTE DES MORTS WI 54927- OSHKOSH WI 54901 -4923 9325 SPARR INVESTMENTS LLC 103 HIGH AVE OSHKOSH WI 54901 -4808 JRD INVESTMENTS LLC 571 N MAIN ST OSHKOSH WI 54901 -4908 JEREMY WEST 924 BAYSHORE DR OSHKOSH WI 54901 R & M ENTERPRISES 527 MOUNT VERNON ST OSHKOSH WI 54901 -4917 547 N MAIN LLC PO BOX 695 OSHKOSH WI 54903 -0695 SCOTT ANDERSON PO BOX 3152 INCLINE VILLAGE NV 89450- 3152 J WEST RENTALS 570 N MAIN ST OSHKOSH WI 54901 The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature tom a varie€y of sources. These map(s )ldatasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided AS -IS" without warranties of any Idnd and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse. JAGISTIanninaTlan Commission Site Plan Map Ternplate\Plao 1 in = 0.01 mi tin =70 ft Printing Date: 611612014 Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, W1 . 0 ofHKO -fH ON IMF WATER User. debpr, W I 1 in U1 r tin -70ftm :..� >. The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its oven use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. Printing Date: 6/1612014 O f H�� f --I These maps)1datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided "AS -IS" without Prepared by City of Oshkosh, Wi ON IHr WAIM warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse. JAGiStPlanninfflan Commission Site Plan Map Temp €atc!Wlan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User. debora 20 - J r kf TE s xY w .I . li f N s lv w i , 4 1: - n I 1 in U1 r tin -70ftm :..� >. The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its oven use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. Printing Date: 6/1612014 O f H�� f --I These maps)1datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided "AS -IS" without Prepared by City of Oshkosh, Wi ON IHr WAIM warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse. JAGiStPlanninfflan Commission Site Plan Map Temp €atc!Wlan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User. debora 20