The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About29. 14-141 MARCH 25, 2014 14-141 RESOLUTION (CARRIED__7-0_____LOST_______LAID OVER_______WITHDRAWN_______) PURPOSE: APPROVE MIDDLE VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN INITIATED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved WHEREAS, the City’s Comprehensive Plan contains recommendations regarding improving housing and neighborhoods by implementing neighborhood improvement strategies in priority areas; and WHEREAS, the Common Council has identified strong neighborhoods as a priority Strategic Plan goal; and WHEREAS, the Common Council previously approved implementing a Healthy Neighborhoods Initiative that seeks to improve priority neighborhoods and housing, as well as benefits all residents by helping to maintain or increase property values in transitional and distressed neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Middle Village Neighborhood Association approached the City regarding how to address current and future issues concerning their neighborhood; and WHEREAS, based on a resident led planning effort, the attached 'Middle Village Neighborhood Plan' was created to address neighborhood challenges and promote reinvestment in their neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission found that the 'Middle Village Neighborhood Plan' is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and supports neighborhood revitalization efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the attached "Middle Village Neighborhood Plan" is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive and Strategic Plans and is hereby approved. O YHKOf E ON THE WATER TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Darryn Burich Director of Planning Services DATE: March 20, 2014 RE: Approve Middle Village Neighborhood Plan (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) Staff requests approval of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan, which focuses on a target neighborhood bounded by Church Avenue, Jackson Street, W. Irving Avenue and N. Main Street commonly identified as "Middle Village ". Like many of the residential neighborhoods in the central city, Middle Village has experienced significant-disinvestment and declining neighborhood conditions over the past thirty years with the area slowly transforming into majority student rental. However, existing neighborhood assets, combined with efforts by residents (primarily owner occupied properties), the City of Oshkosh and partner organizations have laid the foundation for neighborhood revitalization that has culminated with the development of this plan. The Plan establishes a "vision" for the neighborhood and represents a starting off point for future implementation of plan activities that will be done in partnership with the city and the neighborhood association. The Middle Village Neighborhood Plan is the first plan created under the healthy neighborhoods concept driven by "grassroots" support within the neighborhood. The vision and plan goals and objectives were developed by the neighborhood and often involve the neighborhood as the prime driver of particular implementation actions. ANALYSIS The Plan was prepared for the Association with the intent to support their efforts in addressing neighborhood challenges and promoting reinvestment. The plan outlines four focus areas identified by the Association and explores each area and makes specific action recommendations and responsibilities for lead implementation. Those four areas are: • educate both government and residents about concerns and visions for the future; • promote collaboration between the City, neighborhood, and organizations to achieve mutual goals to enhance the neighborhood; create "pride of place" with the community; • initiate change by addressing specific issues and opportunities; • strengthen the city by improving the quality of life in neighborhoods. The goals and objectives have been reviewed and do not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planning objectives of the City. FISCAL IMPACT It is not anticipated that additional city services will need to be provided beyond existing service levels that would require additional staffing. The Plan does however identify various activities that will require funding allocations through the Healthy Neighborhoods funds, CDBG, or Great Neighborhoods CIP funding to carry out such activities as property acquisition, homebuyer incentives and rehabilitation grants. [.-:U: we] FOTJIt►F1T� •e The Plan Commission approved of this request at its March 18, 2014 meeting. Approve J City Manager ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF THE MIDDLE VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Plan Commission meeting of March 18, 2014 BACKGROUND Staff requests acceptance of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan, which focuses on a target neighborhood bounded by Church Avenue, Jackson Street, W. Irving Avenue and N. Main Street. Like much of the central city, the Middle Village Neighborhood has experienced significant disinvestment over the past thirty years. However, existing neighborhood assets, combined with efforts by residents, the City of Oshkosh and partner organizations have laid the foundation for neighborhood revitalization. The purpose of this review is for the Plan Commission to make a determination that the proposed goals and objectives in the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan are consistent with the City's 2005 -2025 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planning objectives of the City. ANALYSIS The City of Oshkosh - Planning Services Division in partnership with the Middle Village Neighborhood Association have worked together to develop the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan. The Plan serves the following purposes: ID • Educate both city government and neighborhood residents about each other's concerns and visions for the fixture. • Promote collaboration between the City, the neighborhood, and local public, private and non - profit organizations in order to achieve mutual goals. to enhance the neighborhood. • Create "pride of place" within the community by identifying and developing the assets within each neighborhood. • Initiate change, rather than simply reacting to it, by addressing specific issues and opportunities. • Strengthen the city by improving the quality of life in neighborhoods. This plan is prepared for the Middle Village Neighborhood Association with the intent to support their efforts in addressing neighborhood challenges and promoting reinvestment. Created during a yearlong resident led planning process; the plan may be used by the Middle Village Neighborhood Association, the City of Oshkosh, and partner organizations to ensure neighborhood improvements and activities are implemented to meet the needs of residents. The plan first offers a brief neighborhood history, followed by a snapshot of current conditions, including both assets and concerns identified throughout the planning process. The plan then outlines four focus areas identified by Middle Village Neighborhood Association during public input meetings: Community Building, Public Infrastructure, Safety, and Housing. Individual sections explore each focus area in depth, assess current conditions, provide goal and objectives, and make specific recommendations for lead implementers. Prior to Council consideration, this plan is reviewed by the Plan Commission for consistency with the City's 2005 -2025 Comprehensive Plan, official maps, and other planned activities of the City. Staff has reviewed all proposed goals and objectives and believes they do not conflict with to the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planning objectives of the City. RECOMMENDATIONS /CONDITIONS Staff recommends acceptance of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan, together with a finding that the identified goals and objectives are not in conflict with the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive Plan. The Plan Commission approved of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item. Mr. Burich commented that this plan is the culmination of a year's worth of work on neighborhood initiatives and staff is looking forward to its implementation once the plan is approved. Ms. Williams reviewed the area included within the boundaries of the Middle Village Neighborhood and reviewed the neighborhood planning process that was completed to prepare the neighborhood plan. She discussed the survey process and the three homes that were demolished in the neighborhood as they were blighted properties detrimental to the community. She further commented that visioning sessions were held and reviewed the plan overview as well as the four focus areas of the plan which are Community Building, Public Infrastructure, Safety, and Housing. She proceeded to discuss the details of the Community Building Goals, Community Building Strategies, Public Infrastructure Goals, Public Infrastructure Strategies, Safety Goals, Safety Strategies, Housing Goals, and Housing Strategies which are all part of the neighborhood plan as a whole. She stated that the next steps for this item was to receive a finding from the Plan Commission that the plan is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and then be forwarded on to the Common Council for approval followed by implementation of said plan. Mr. Thoms questioned if there was anything in the Comprehensive Plan referencing street widths and if there was anything the neighborhood desired in the upcoming street reconstruction in this area that would conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Steve Gohde, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that the City's current ordinance was for a standard of 60 foot right -of -way for public streets however in these older existing neighborhoods, the standard was decreased to 30 feet and the neighborhood desired to have the street right -of -way at 28 feet instead which would be adequate with single -side parking restrictions. Mr. Thoms questioned if there was something that the Plan Commission needed to address to allow this substandard street width. Mr. Gohde responded that the right -of -way is currently substandard. Item -Acceptance of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan Mr. Burich indicated that the standards for street right -of -way width is generally applied to new developments and it is not feasible to acquire street dedication from property owners in this neighborhood to extend the width of the street to the current standard. Mr. Thoms commented that the reconstruction plans to reduce the street right -of -way to 28 feet is going to make it more substandard than it is currently and he realized that it would provide for additional green space however that is not in the Comprehensive Plan and he felt the Commission needed to do something to address this. Mr. Burich recommended proceeding with the Neighborhood Plan as drafted and forwarding it to the Common Council for their decision. Mr. Gohde added that the Board of Public Works can deviate from ordinance standards for the street widths. Mr. Thorns felt that if the Neighborhood Plan had conflicts with the City's Comprehensive Plan that those exceptions should be noted. Mr. Burich responded that this issue was not necessarily in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan as the substandard street right -of -way is an existing situation. The different logistical situation is recognized and the point can be noted for the Common Council in the Plan Commission minutes. Tony Palmeri, 212 W. Parkway Avenue, stated that he was a member of the Middle Village Neighborhood Association and thanked the Planning Services staff for their efforts in developing this plan and he felt the workshop recently held was very positive. He thanked staff for their support in this effort. Gary Gray, 815 W. Linwood Avenue, questioned what the acceptance of the Neighborhood Plan meant. He wanted clarification if it was the same as receiving it or approving it. Mr. Burich replied that acceptance of the plan would be approving it. Mr. Gray commented that the commitment of staff time and the funding to support the Neighborhood Associations forming was a concern. Dorry Wilner, representing Habitat for Humanity, stated that her organization was in favor of the Neighborhood Plan and she was looking forward to working with the City on projects. She further stated that they have been involved with other neighborhood projects and were excited about this plan. Ifotion by Vajgrt to approve the acceptance of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan. Seconded by Propp. Mr. Fojtik complimented the neighbors and staff that invested the time and effort working together to initiate improvements to this neighborhood. Ms. Propp agreed. Item - Acceptance of the Ifiddle Village Neighborhood Plan Mr. Hinz stated that Neighbor`Vorks had come to town recently and he felt that it helps to have neighborhood involvement and he hoped that this would spur other neighborhoods to want to form similar associations with neighborhood plans such as this. Motion carried 8 -0. Item -A ecep tan ce of the Middle Village Neighborhood Plan 11 � Prepared January 2013 — February 2014 by the Middle Village Neighborhood Association and City of Oshkosh- Planning Services Division r � �, � A comprehensive report to address quality of life concerns in the Middle Village Neighborhood Compiled and contributions by: Middle Village Neighborhood Plan Work Group Andrew Bosma, Christ Lutheran Representative Artemis Wright, Resident Brad Crook, Resident Christina Crook, MVNATreasurer David Stubbe, Resident Diane Hoffman, Resident Janine Wright, Resident James Englund, Landlord John Hoffman, Resident Judson Rikkers, Landlord Julie Johnson, Winnebago County Historical Society Kieran O'Callaghon, Resident Kris Pillar, Resident Linda Sanchez - Reid,, Resident Lori Palmeri, MYNA Coordinator Lori Stubbe, Resident Mark Arend, Resident Pamela Pillar, Resident Sarah Ponder, Resident Thea Butt, Resident Tony Palmeri, MYNA Board Member With assistance from: City of Oshkosh Planning Services Division im MILPM 7=�Imlffmilli U W k 1J E - i 4VfTf k-AVE f $:, iv �_~f TI r iU+ U&RA RAVE NIASN[NGTONAV Table of Content Neighborhood Planning Process ..................................................................... ..............................1 ExecutiveSummary .......................................................................................... ..............................2 Introduction..................................................................................................... ..............................3 NeighborhoodProjects .................................................................................... ..............................3 NeighborhoodHistory ...................................................................................... ..............................4 ExistingConditions ........................................................................................... ..............................6 Developing the Vision for the Future of Middle Village .................................. .............................12 Assetsand Concerns... ................................ ..................................... ....................................... ... 14 PlanDevelopment ........................................................................................... .............................15 CommunityBuilding ............................................................................ .............................16 Public Infrastructure ........................................................................... .............................18 Safety.................................................................................................. .............................20 Housing.....................................:......................................................... .............................22 Appendix A —Neighborhood Projects Neighborhood Project Map ................................................................ .............................25 Neighborhood Activity Timeline ......................................................... .............................26 Appendix B — Neighborhood Maps NeighborhoodBoundary ..................................................................... ........:....................28 ExistingLand Use ................................................................................. .............................29 ExistingZoning ...................................................................................... .................'...........30 Non -Owner Occupied Parcels .............................................................. .............................31 Appendix C — Blight Elimination Grant & Kick Off Event Neighborhood Assessment .................................................................. .............................32 Appendix D — Neighborhood Survey ......................................................:......... .............................34 Appendix E — Neighborhood Crime Data ......................................................... .............................37 Neighborhood Planning Process The neighborhood planning process is a component of the City of Oshkosh - Healthy Neighborhood Initiative (OHNI). The process was developed to identify what resident's value most wit.hin their neighborhood and outlines a clear vision of needs and priorities. The process is resident -led, resulting in a neighborhood plan that serves as a guide for investment in the neighborhood. Healthy neighborhoods are essential to the overall well being of Oshkosh and should be viewed as the strategic building blocks of our community. A neighborhood plan must strive to eliminate elements that erode character and enhance elements that improve the quality of life for current and future residents. Architectural significance, pedestrian amenities, diversity, affordability, and proximity to services are several examples of assets our neighborhoods possess. Preservation, enhancement, and revitalization strategies to protect these assets have been developed to ensure that Oshkosh's neighborhoods prosper. Below are the steps taken to complete the neighborhood planning process: W "AM 'RE �Me ti�p�em�►�aC� 1 Executive Summary The Middle Village Neighborhood Plan focuses on a target neighborhood, bounded by Church Avenue, Jackson Street, W. Irving Avenue and N. Main Street. Like much of the central city, the neighborhood has experienced significant disinvestment over the past thirty years. However, existing neighborhood assets, combined with efforts by residents, the City of Oshkosh and partner organizations have laid the foundation for neighborhood revitalization. Since 2010, the Middle Village Neighborhood Association (MYNA) has served the neighborhood in varying capacities, from social and cleanup events, blight elimination, resident engagement and formal planning activities in partnership with the City of Oshkosh, Habitat for Humanity, and NeighborWorks Badgerland. In 2011, the City of Oshkosh formally recognized Middle Village as a neighborhood upon submission of their specific geographical and organizational information. In 2013, the Middle Village Plan Work Group was formed as a coalition of residents and partners to support neighborhood revitalization. This plan is prepared for the MYNA with the intent to support their efforts in addressing neighborhood challenges and promoting reinvestment. Created during a yearlong resident led planning effort the plan may be used by the MYNA, the City of Oshkosh, and partner organizations to ensure neighborhood improvements and activities are implemented to meet the needs of the residents who reside there. The plan first offers a brief history, followed by a snapshot of current conditions, including both assets and concerns identified throughout the planning process. The plan then outlines four focus areas identified by MVNA during public input meetings: Community Building, Public Infrastructure, Safety, and Housing. Individual sections explore each focus area in depth, assess current conditions, provide goal details and objectives, and make specific recommendations for lead implementers. Planning for a neighborhood must always involve the most important stakeholders — its residents and property owners. The plan was researched and drafted under the guidance of the MYNA leadership, residents and city staff. Preliminary recommendations were then shared in a series of public participation events where the resulting conversations and comments were used to shape final recommendations for the plan. Once the neighborhood plan is approved, a detailed implementation plan will be drafted. The implementation plan will outline specific and time -bound steps to be taken to ensure plan elements are successfully carried out. Additionally, the implementation plan will provide performance measures to track the progress of future revitalization efforts. Fil Introduction In January of 2013, Middle Village became the first recognized neighborhood association to begin working with the City of Oshkosh to develop a neighborhood plan. Over the course of a year, residents.worked with staff to identify goals and objectives that would address current and future issues concerning the neighborhood. The purpose of this neighborhood plan is to develop strategies for addressing neighbors' concerns, and set the foundation for collaborative efforts between the public and private sectors to help implement the plan recommendations. More specifically, neighborhood plans are intended to: • Educate both city government and neighborhood residents about each other's concerns and visions for the future. • Promote collaboration between the City, the neighborhood, and local public, private and non - profit organizations in order to achieve mutual goals to enhance the neighborhood. • Create "pride of place" within the community by identifying and developing the assets within each neighborhood. • Initiate change, rather than simply reacting to it, by addressing specific issues and opportunities. • Strengthen the city by improving the quality of life in neighborhoods. Neighborhood Projects During the development of this plan several projects were completed and have begun to address some of the neighborhood concerns. • Eliminated 3 vacant and blighted homes and purchased a vacant lot to provide the opportunity for neighborhood green space. • Residents further developed a concept plan for their desired use of the vacant lots. • Neighborhood traffic survey in response to residents' concerns with speeding. • Worked with City staff on 2014 road reconstruction design to incorporate traffic calming measures, wider terraces, and decorative street lighting. • Planted additional terrace trees on Franklin Street, Frederick Street, Church Avenue and W. Irving Avenue. • Modifications to the garbage collection day. • Project Safe Passage to address issues associated with the Downtown Pub Crawl.. • Organized clean up days with NeighborWorks Badgerland and Habitat for Humanity. • Neighborhood walks with the Oshkosh Police Department. A full timeline of neighborhood activities and a map highlighting current and completed projects can be found in Appendix A on page 29. Neighborhood History to Early 20 Century /Pre World War n Just a little over one hundred years ago this neighborhood was lined by lovely old trees, churches and stately homes which were inhabited by some of the most prominent families in Oshkosh. Since the late 1850'x, lumber baron, John R. Morgan and his family owned the property on Church, Franklin and Parkway Street's. In 1884, Mr. Morgan built a stately Queen Anne on the corner of Church Avenue and Franklin Street. Their eldest daughter Elnora Morgan Rounds would come to live next door at the corner of Franklin and Parkway. Mr. Morgan's two nephews, Tom and Albert Morgan, co- owners in the Morgan Company also lived on Franklin and Parkway. W. G. Maxcy House —formerly 108 Church Avenue Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum corner on Jackson Street in front of the Oshkosh Safety Building was the beautiful home of Richard Morgan, brother to John R Morgan both co- founders of Morgan Brothers Company. The prestige this neighborhood once had has almost all but disappeared. Many of these stately homes are still standing, however, many have turned into rentals. Restored, the John R Morgan house still stands and is home of the Winnebago County Historical Society. Edward R. Jones House— 519 Franklin Street Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum On Church Avenue, next door to Mr. Morgan . lived W. G. Maxcy, wealthy magnet of the Oshkosh Water Works Co., today this property is the home of Christ Lutheran Church. Across the street lived Andrew Jackson, then vice - president of the German - American bank. Directly across the street from Mr. Morgan was the prominent, talented and wealthy family of George W. Gates, retired manager of The Diamond Match Company, today this is the property of the Oshkosh Safety Building. Just around the 3 4 t p tfm { s 4 tw �1f1� W�f jf.S,i,lil� lIl6S:Itll�li��i i Td 91, pt�" r 5 Andrew M. Willock House — Located at 538 Central Street Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum 12 ! & P W. G. Maxcy House —formerly 108 Church Avenue Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum corner on Jackson Street in front of the Oshkosh Safety Building was the beautiful home of Richard Morgan, brother to John R Morgan both co- founders of Morgan Brothers Company. The prestige this neighborhood once had has almost all but disappeared. Many of these stately homes are still standing, however, many have turned into rentals. Restored, the John R Morgan house still stands and is home of the Winnebago County Historical Society. Edward R. Jones House— 519 Franklin Street Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum On Church Avenue, next door to Mr. Morgan . lived W. G. Maxcy, wealthy magnet of the Oshkosh Water Works Co., today this property is the home of Christ Lutheran Church. Across the street lived Andrew Jackson, then vice - president of the German - American bank. Directly across the street from Mr. Morgan was the prominent, talented and wealthy family of George W. Gates, retired manager of The Diamond Match Company, today this is the property of the Oshkosh Safety Building. Just around the 3 4 t p tfm { s 4 tw �1f1� W�f jf.S,i,lil� lIl6S:Itll�li��i i Td 91, pt�" r 5 Andrew M. Willock House — Located at 538 Central Street Photo courtesy of the Oshkosh Public Museum 12 were removed. 21St Century By early 2000's many properties were razed to make way for a new development of townhouses on Division Street by the Burns Development Corporation. It was thought that would be a catalytic development to spur further reinvestment in the neighborhood. Within a decade, this neighborhood -along with the City of Oshkosh and the entire country's housing market took a turn for the worse. The economic recession and financing woes hit vulnerable communities especially hard, with Burns Townhome Development - located on Division many foreclosures in Oshkosh's central city Street between W. Irving Avenue and Church Avenue. neighborhoods. Since the recession, investors have acquired foreclosures and converted once owner - occupied residences to investment properties. 5 Existina Conditions Located just west of Main Street and east of the University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh campus, the Middle Village neighborhood is bounded by Church Avenue on the south, Irving Avenue on the north, and Jackson and Main Streets, on the east and west, respectively. The neighborhood is roughly 44 acres with 187 parcels containing single - family homes, commercial businesses, apartments, and churches. The graph below shows the existing land use within Middle Village. A map showing the distribution of uses can be found in Appendix B on page 33. Middle Village Neighborh000d Existing Land Use Land Use Category I7 Single Family, ® Two - Family 0 Multi - Family ® Mixed -Use ® Commercial Il Institutional Parking Lot ® Vacant Land Middle Village includes portions of the Irving /Church and North Main Street Historic Districts and has many examples of well- maintained historic homes and businesses. American Foursquare, Bungalow, and Queen Anne architecture can be found throughout the neighborhood. While there are examples of well maintained and restored properties, there are many homes that have suffered from a loss of historic character which has been a cause for concern for the remaining homeowners. For example, below are three successive properties that exhibit a significant degree of alterations to their porches. Porches are considered an integral element of traditional architecture and can radically detract from the overall appearance of the neighborhood and streetscape when altered inappropriately. N. Neighborhood Demographic Profile Demographic data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau was collected to better understand the population living in the neighborhood. Middle Village is part of Census Block Group 6 and Census Tract 5 but both levels of aggregation do not match the Source: US Census, 2010 neighborhood *Includes Some Other Race Alone or 2+ Races in combination, boundary exactly but is the best available data to accurately represent the neighborhood profile. A map showing the distribution of each level of aggregation can be found below. Demographic Data Aggregation Ll 1� I b F_ -i t � 1 1 _j It t - r L@Eend Census Tract 5 Block Group 6 Middle Village Age The population living in Census Tract 5, Block Group 6 is younger than the average resident of the City of Oshkosh according to 2010 Census data. The median age of residents within Middle Village was 24.7 compared to the City of Oshkosh overall, which was 33.5. Income According to the 2010 Census, the median household income for Census Tract 5, Block Group 6 was $21,339 compared to the City of Oshkosh overall, which was $43,203. 7 Block Group 6 Census Tract 5 City of Oshkosh PEOPLE Population 944 6,131 66,083 Male 52.01% 3,296 51.2% Female 47.99% 2,835 48.8% Average Household Size 2.33 2.21 2.24 Median Age 24.7 24.9 33.5 Median Income $21,339 $27,830 $43,203 Population Density per sq. mile 3,921 6,413 2,483 RACE White 83.9% 90.2% 90.5% African American 4.8% 3.0% 3.1% American Indian or Alaska Native 1.4% 0.9% 0.8% Asian 3.4% 2.9% 3.2% Other* 6.5% 3.0% 2.4% obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau was collected to better understand the population living in the neighborhood. Middle Village is part of Census Block Group 6 and Census Tract 5 but both levels of aggregation do not match the Source: US Census, 2010 neighborhood *Includes Some Other Race Alone or 2+ Races in combination, boundary exactly but is the best available data to accurately represent the neighborhood profile. A map showing the distribution of each level of aggregation can be found below. Demographic Data Aggregation Ll 1� I b F_ -i t � 1 1 _j It t - r L@Eend Census Tract 5 Block Group 6 Middle Village Age The population living in Census Tract 5, Block Group 6 is younger than the average resident of the City of Oshkosh according to 2010 Census data. The median age of residents within Middle Village was 24.7 compared to the City of Oshkosh overall, which was 33.5. Income According to the 2010 Census, the median household income for Census Tract 5, Block Group 6 was $21,339 compared to the City of Oshkosh overall, which was $43,203. 7 Housing Based on current City parcel data the neighborhood housing stock is 70.4% rental. The graph below compares owner occupied parcels within Middle Village to the City of Oshkosh as a whole. The City of Oshkosh overall has experienced a 3% decline in homeownership over the last nine years compared to the Middle Village neighborhood which has experienced a 12% decline. Comparison of Owner - Occupied Parcels 2005 -2013 77% 76 °/u 79 %u 78% 771° 77 /u u 80 °lu — - ° ° 76/° ZSs�Z4ri- 70% p..._ -- - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- — - ..__ i - ui r. -_, City Wide 50,° 42 °1u` 40% 40% 38 %u ° Owner- omlpied 40% 361 34uu 36 %�__ 36% 30 - -i-- MiddleVillage j 30 %° -------- - - - - -- - - - -- -- owrier-Occupied } 20 °lu ! - - -- -- - - -- - -- - -- -- - -- - --- - - - - -- -- 10:£ - -- - - - - -- - f 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: City of Oshkosh Housing data obtained from the City of Oshkosh Assessor's Division was averaged to compare the existing housing stock in Middle Village to the City of Oshkosh overall. Typically due to their size, affordability, and proximity to the university, homes are purchased by investors for student housing. Additionally, should the University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh enrollment continue to expand, the demand for student housing will also, leading to additional conversion concerns. Efforts to increase housing densities near the University will be needed to alleviate the pressure on surrounding neighborhoods, such as Middle Village. Source: City of Oshkosh Assessors Division, 2013 H.* Middle Village City of Oshkosh Size 1,950 sq. ft. 1,544 sq. ft. Bedrooms 3.8 3 Bathrooms 2 2 Year Built 1908 2002 Grade* C- C Condition ** Below Average Average Total Dwelling Units 321 20,281 Owner Occupied 29.6% 74.1% Renter Occupied 70.4% 25.6% Assessed Value $94,556.55 $121,994 *Grade is the quality of architecture of the building. * *Condition is how well maintained the home is for its age. Source: City of Oshkosh Assessors Division, 2013 H.* Furthermore, even though there are crime watch efforts in place and they have been effective, the perception of the neighborhood as an unsafe place persists. Between 2009 and 2013 there was an overall decline in police calls for service within Middle Village. The graph below does show a spike in calls during 2012, which has been attributed to residents actively working with the Oshkosh Police Department to address various problem properties within'the neighborhood. Police Calls For Service in Middle Village* * Includes both Field Initiated and Dispatched calls for service A summary of calls by event type from 2009 -2013 is included below. The data suggests that there were more person vs. person crimes (battery, domestics, robbery, sex offenses, harassment, etc) than property crimes (damage to property, theft, auto theft, burglary). However, there were a large amount of assist calls and what is classified as crime prevention calls (suspicious person /vehicle /situation, building checks, open doors, etc) which could be a result of proactive crime watch efforts by the neighborhood association and resident's willingness to report suspicious activity. A map showing the distribution of resident initiated police calls within the neighborhood and trends in each event type can be found in Appendix E on page 41. Summary of Calls by Event Type 2009 -2013 in Middle Village* 2000 , 1801 1800 1600 1400 . 1200 1000 882 800 600 370 =. 401 400 200 46 277 192 289 261 251 a e a Q * Includes both Field Initiated and Dispatched calls for service 9 Blight indicators were next categorized based on the type of programming necessary to address existing conditions within the neighborhood, as shown in the graph below. "Curb Appeal" Projects are defined as minimal exterior property maintenance improvements such as overgrown landscaping, broken or rusty porch railings, torn awnings or screens and peeling paint on steps or porches. Owner /Rental Rehab projects are those that require a larger investment to rectify, such as peeling siding or trim paint, failing roof or siding, cracked foundations, and mold. New Construction projects include unpaved driveways, failing garages and heaving /crumbling walkways. Finally, Infrastructure Improvements are those located in the public right of way such as the lack of curbing, gravel driveway aprons and cracked /heaving public sidewalks. Neiahborhood Bliaht Indicators by ProaramTvpe Source: Middle Village Neighborhood Assessment, 2012 The City of Oshkosh and other local agencies currently have housing programs to address many of the indicators identified during the neighborhood assessment but funding is limited and requires applicants to meet federal income requirements. Additional housing programs are currently being developed to "fill the gap" for homeowners who do not meet the federal income requirements but desire to improve their property. 10 While there are real concerns within the neighborhood, a focus solely on highlighting these problems can often define the neighborhood 'by its negatives and reinforce a negative image. Efforts at revitalization have to recognize and build around strengths and assets. One of the first efforts taken by residents within Middle Village to change their image was the creation of a recognized neighborhood association. In 2010, a core group of residents built on an existing neighborhood watch and formed around the need for park space in the neighborhood. A petition was circulated and residents approached the Parks Advisory Board, resulting in the mapping of needed park space in the central city, being officially planned for in the Park and Open Space Plan, approved October 25, 2011. The City's recent acquisition of property located at the corner of Franklin Street and Ida Avenue has created the opportunity to develop park space (pictured left). Residents have begun working on concept plans for the lot which they currently call "Village Green ". "Village Green" — City -owned vacant lot located at the corner of Franklin Street and Ida Avenue. In 2011, the neighborhood association started hosting monthly neighborhood walks in partnership with the Oshkosh Police Department and Team Policing. These walks resulted in litter pickups and a reduction in drug activity. It also led to relationships between residents and partnerships with organizations such as NeighborWorks for organized Dumpster Days and Habitat for Humanity for a volunteer -led beautification event. Also, in 2012 residents and the Oshkosh Police Department participated in the Everyday Heroes in Action Challenge to assist with the removal of a garage and tree. Since 2011, the neighborhood association has hosted three major block parties. Additionally, the neighborhood association created Project Safe Passage in response to challenges with the Downtown Pub Crawl resulting in a more positive interaction with participants which has limited property damage previously experienced by the event. The efforts of the neighborhood association have brought about the momentum necessary to complete the neighborhood planning process. Additionally, Middle Village has many locational advantages and is one of the most walkable neighborhoods in Oshkosh. The neighborhood is bordered by Downtown Oshkosh which provides access to shopping, restaurants, and events. It is also within a ten minute walk to the Leach Amphitheater; the Oshkosh Saturday Farmers Market; the Riverwalk; The University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh Campus; the bus terminal; and City and County services. According to data obtained from Walk Score, Middle Village scored 82 out of 100, compared to the City of Oshkosh overall, which scored 32 out of 100. 11 Developing the Vision for the Future of Middle Village In April of 2013, residents and property owners were invited to participate in one of two visioning workshops held at Christ Lutheran Church in Middle Village, A total of 18 residents and landlords attended the workshops to begin prioritizing information identified by the neighborhood survey, conducted in January of 2013. The additional results from the survey can be found in Appendix D on page 38. Residents were asked to prioritize three concerns that needed to be addressed. Below is a summary of the results from the exercise: MIDDLE VILLAGE CHALLENGES Challenges mentioned in survey Property conditions Safety /crime Landlord involvement Safe place for kids to play 1,1,1,2,3,3 Boarding /rooming houses 1,2,3,3,3,3 Condition of vacant homes/ properties 1,2,2,3,3 Snow removal 1,1,2 Rental problems 1,2,3 Infrastructure 2,3 Street lighting 2 Urban wildlife 2 Neighborliness 3 Public transportation Quality schools Foreclosures Real estate values Employment opportunities Trash collection Resident involvement Parking regulation Noise complaints Neighborhood image Fences /gardens Challenges mentioned at visioning meetings Concentration of sex offenders 2 Tax rate Overhead power lines Rental signage Poverty /affordability Home ownership Neighborhood signage Property conditions, safety /crime, and landlord involvement were identified as the top three concerns facing Middle Village. A safe place for kids to play, boarding /rooming houses, and condition of vacant homes /properties were also ranked at the top. Although it wasn't identified during the visioning sessions, increasing homeownership was consistently discussed throughout the planning process. Residents recognized the need to attract new homeowners with a desire to invest in the neighborhood's future. 12 Next, residents and property owners were given the same opportunity to rank the top three assets they wished to preserve within the neighborhood. Below is a summary of the results from the exercise: Proximity to downtown, friendly neighbors, and historic character were identified as the top three assets within Middle Village. Walkability, proximity to amenities /services, and affordability were also ranked at the top. MIDDLE VILLAGE TREASURES Treasures mentioned in survey Close to downtown Friendly neighbors 1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3 Historic character 1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3 Walkability 1,1,1,1,2,2,3 Proximity to amenities /services 1,1,2,2,3,3,3 Affordability 1,2,2,2,2 Diversity 1,2,3 Close to work 1,3 Infrastructure 3 Schools Near bus routes Churches /faith community Treasures mentioned at visioning meetings Architecture 2 Detached garages Social gatherings "The Middle Village Neighborhood is a thriving, progressive community noted for affordable housing options, architectural styles and the diversity of its residents. Care has been taken to develop and preserve the historic character of the neighborhood including the park -like nature of its tree -lined streets. The Middle Village Neighborhood includes well - maintained and attractive properties and a vibrant and friendly community. This also includes pedestrian friendly streets and open space for children to play and neighbors to gather." 13 Assets and Concerns within Middle Village Based on the survey results and conversations with residents the chart below was created to summarize the current assets and concerns within Middle Village. Assets Concerns Great location, close to downtown Suffers from negative perception from people outside the neighborhood Proximity to services Ethnic and economic diversity Criminal activity in certain blocks Substantial number of rental properties - 70% Presence of stable institutions like Christ Lutheran and the Winnebago County Historic Society High rate of foreclosure Architecture within the Irving & Church /North Main Aging housing stock that requires a large investment to Street Historic Districts & neighborhood rehabilitate Affordable housing options Substantial number of poorly maintained homes Provides homeownership opportunities for many No safe place for children in the neighborhood to play income levels Lack of organized groups of neighbors working on Many examples of well maintained historic homes positive activities High levels of pride and loyalty among the present Organized activities primarily focused on crime & safety homeowners Rental population is disconnected from neighborhood Socialization among neighbors in parts of activities neighborhood Need for greater institutional, business, landlord, and People with leadership skills tenant involvement Active crime watch group Some streets are in need of reconstruction & modern amenities Walkability — ranked 82 out of 100 by Walkscore.org Homeownership rates are declining and longterm Access to cultural activities and events held on Main residents are leaving Street, the Leach Amphitheater and the Riverwalk Lack of street lighting causes residents to retreat to Newly reconstructed streets with terrace trees their homes at night A neighborhood association that is actively making the neighborhood a better place 14 Plan Development In May of 2013, residents began meeting bi- weekly to start drafting elements of their neighborhood plan. Using the concerns and assets found on the previous pages, residents categorized the list into four priority areas: Community Building, Public Infrastructure, Safety and Housing. Next, residents were asked to identify goals the Middle Village residents and property owners, City of Oshkosh, and future partners could work towards over the next three to five years. A total of twenty one goals were developed and are listed below. Community Building 1. Build a sense of community and pride. 2. Improve communication within the Middle Village neighborhood and with other neighborhood associations. 3. Partner with neighborhood businesses. 4. Partner with UWO to address neighborhood concerns. Public Infrastructure 1. Calm traffic on neighborhood streets. 2. Improve visibility at intersections. 3. Improve pedestrian safety. 4. Provide public green space /park space. 5. Increase streetscaping. 6. Implement green infrastructure, where possible. Safety 1. Improve personal safety for residents and visitors. 2. Create safe gathering spaces for the neighborhood. 3. Develop solutions to provide pedestrian access in all seasons and weather conditions. 4. Address safety issues related to domestic pets. 5. Improve lighting in the neighborhood. Housing 1. Increase maintenance levels in the neighborhood. 2. Take steps to encourage higher - quality housing. 4. Increase homeownership in the neighborhood. 5. Encourage landlord involvement in the neighborhood. 6. Encourage tenant involvement in the neighborhood. Once the goals were finalized, objectives — which have measurable elements that mark progress toward its intended goal —were proposed, discussed, and agreed upon by those in attendance. 15 Community Building Currently, there is a disconnect between Middle Village neighborhood residents and existing programs and organizations to assist with neighborhood activities. The community building goals and objectives were developed to strengthen the quality of life and relationships between residents, business owners, and landlords within the neighborhood. Additionally, this section has identified the need to develop strategies for residents to become more connected and engaged in their community. The philosophy is that a person who knows their neighbor on a first name basis is more likely to help their neighbors when needed. Due to the transient nature of the neighborhood it will be important for long term residents to educate new residents on the expectations of the neighborhood in a manner that benefits everyone who resides there. Toa Recommendations: ® Develop marketing and "welcome packet" materials in conjunction with City of Oshkosh Neighborhood Organizing Program. ®. Work with the Community Development Department to develop funding to install informational kiosks at neighborhood green spaces. ® MVNA and Community Development should work together to install neighborhood identification signage by the end of 2014. ® MVNA should explore business sponsorship and fundraising opportunities to continue neighborhood association activities. GOAL 1. BUILD A SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND PRIDE. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Hold at least two (2) social events and two (2) safety events per MVNA /OPD year. Objective 2: Install visual identity symbols through wayfinding and /or signage MVNA /Community (e.g. murals, signs, banners, flags, etc.). Development Objective 3: Diversify existing neighborhood association "block walk," which MVNA /OPD currently includes communicating /socializing with neighbors, litter pickup and property maintenance observations. Objective 4: Develop a relationship with the Farmers Market and request an MVNA /Farmers Market extension from Main Street to Division Street where residents could showcase their neighborhood and products. Objective 5: Develop a "good neighbor" contest /award. MVNA /Community Development Objective 6: Develop fundraising campaign to help fund neighborhood MVNA /Community association activities. Development 16 GOAL 2. IMPROVE COMMUNICATION WITHIN THE MIDDLE VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WITH OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Develop "welcome packet" for new neighbors. MYNA Objective 2: Announce neighborhood news /milestones through various platforms including Facebook, email and newsletters. MVNA Objective 3: Recruit intern to perform neighborhood outreach. MYNA Objective 4: Create static neighborhood website with two (2) neighborhood contacts. MYNA /UWO Business Success Center Objective 5: Install informational kiosks at neighborhood green spaces to keep residents informed of upcoming events. MVNA /Community Development GOAL 3. PARTNER WITH NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESSES. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Continue working with Growing Seeds of Change Community Garden to donate produce to neighborhood businesses. MVNA Objective 2: Request a Middle Village movie night at Time Cinema. MVNA Objective 3: Connect with 3 -5 neighborhood businesses per year. MVNA /N. Main Street BID GOAL 4. PARTNER WITH UWO TO ADDRESS NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Develop "welcome packet" for student renters to welcome them to MVNA /UWO /Community the neighborhood and to inform them about the neighborhood association, Development garbage /recycling, snowplowing, etc. Objective 2: Request to have neighborhood involved with UWO committees. MVNA /UWO 17 Public Infrastructure The public infrastructure goals and objectives were developed to reduce the amount of litter and garbage throughout the neighborhood, increase pedestrian safety by reducing traffic speeds, improve visibility at intersections, add additional mid -block lighting, and improve the streetscape within the neighborhood. Improvements to the look and feel of the neighborhood will help create a greater sense of pride for residents and property owners and improve the image of the neighborhood. Top Recommendations: • Work with the City of Oshkosh — Transportation Department and the Traffic Review Advisory Board to address concerns relating to on- street parking and the addition of crosswalks. • Work with Planning Services Division to develop proposals and plans for the vacant lots located within the neighborhood. • Further develop the proposal submitted for installing "art benches" and "mini free libraries" to identify suitable locations on private and public property. • Develop a working relationship with the City of Oshkosh- Sustainability Advisory Board to develop resources and programming that would assist with installation of green infrastructure. GOAL 1. CALM TRAFFIC ON NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Install traffic calming measures such as, traffic circles, speed tables or MVNA /Public Works speed humps and bump outs where feasible. GOAL 2. IMPROVE VISIBILITY AT INTERSECTIONS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Increase the distance that parking is allowed from the intersection of MVNA /Traffic Advisory Board W. Irving Avenue & Frederick Street. Objective 2: Address overgrown landscaping located within the vision triangle at MVNA /Community intersections. Development GOAL 3. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Provide highly visible crosswalk markings at all intersections. Traffic Advisory Board 18 GOAL 4. PROVIDE PUBLIC GREEN SPACE /PARK SPACE. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Develop public pocket park with play area at the corner of Franklin MYNA /Community Street & Ida Avenue. Development /Parks /RDA Objective 2: Install community garden at the corner of Central Street & W. MVNA /Community Parkway Avenue. Development /RDA GOAL 5. INCREASE STREETSCAPING. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Encourage planting of terrace trees. MYNA /Forestry Objective 2: Explore undergrounding overhead utilities. Public Works Objective 3: Install historically consistent decorative street lighting when new streets go in. Public Works Objective 4: Develop plan for a trail of "art benches" and "mini free libraries" MVNA GOAL 6. IMPLEMENT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, WHERE POSSIBLE. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Incentivize the use of rain gardens & rain barrels. Community Development /SAB /Storm Water Utility Objective 2: Investigate the feasibility of pervious driveways, pathways and Community Development /SAB patios. Objective 3: Install bioswales & berms to help with storm water runoff. Public Works Objective 4: Utilize solar energy to supply additional lighting where it makes Community sense. Development /SAB /Public Works /Transportation 19 Safety The feeling of safety and security has a significant impact on the quality of life of residents and their families in any neighborhood. The Middle Village neighborhood is located between the University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh and North Main Street and has become a pass through for students 'going back and forth. The consumption of alcohol can be directly linked to a wide spectrum of problems from unruly behavior to minor and major crimes in the neighborhood. To address these safety concerns and others identified by residents, the neighborhood association will need to work closely with various City Departments, business owners, and the University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh. Top Recommendations: • Neighborhood Association should work with the Oshkosh Police Department to re- establish a Neighborhood Watch or Safety Committee within Middle Village. • A "Project Porch Light" program should be created to address concerns resulting from the elimination of some mid -block lighting throughout the neighborhood. • Proactively enforce the snow removal policy within the neighborhood and consider increasing the fine for Middle Village property owners who repeatedly require City interventions. ® Develop a city -wide policy that considers criminal activity in an area before eliminating mid - block lighting. GOAL 1. IMPROVE PERSONAL SAFETY FOR RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Re- establish Neighborhood Watch MVNA /OPD Objective 2: Continue to work with Oshkosh Police Department to enhance their MVNA /OPD relationship with the neighborhood. Objective 3: Work closely with University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh to produce MVNA /UWO educational materials relating to binge drinking. Objective 4: Proactively address police calls for service and issues associated with OPD /Community Development boarding /rooming houses & high rental concentration in the neighborhood. Objective 5: Conduct a Quality of Life Analysis to better understand the indicators Community Development that influence safety in the neighborhood. GOAL 2. CREATE SAFE GATHERING SPACES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Work with churches to establish a strong partnership and MVNA neighborhood center. FA GOAL 3. DEVELOP SOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IN ALL SEASONS AND WEATHER CONDITIONS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Create a resource list of neighbors willing to assist others with snow MVNA removal, lawn care, or simple maintenance. Manager /Transportation Objective 2: Work with City of Oshkosh Streets Division to ensure snow removal Public Works /MVNA ordinance is strongly enforced within neighborhood. Development /MVNA Objective 3: Investigate and develop a policy for the removal of snow Public Works accumulation from plowing during the winter. GOAL 4. ADDRESS SAFETY ISSUES RELATED TO DOMESTIC PETS. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Educate homeowners /renters on pet waste and leash ordinances in MVNA /City Clerk /Winnebago welcome packets. County Health GOAL S. IMPROVE LIGHTING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Turn on public street lights that have been shut off within the MVNA /Common Council /City neighborhood. Manager /Transportation Objective 2: Develop Project Porch Light Program to include funding for 20 Community additional lighting sources for property owners. Development /MVNA Objective 3: Install historically consistent decorative street lighting when new Public Works streets go in. 21 Housing The neighborhood housing stock is currently 29.6% owner occupied and is continuing to trend away from homeownership. Most of the homes in Middle Village are fast approaching or greater than a century old. They have slowly over time, to varying degrees, been altered to suit current residents. Typically due to their size, affordability, and proximity to the university, homes are purchased by investors for student housing. Over time, this has begun to erode the historic character of the neighborhood and has been a cause for concern for the remaining homeowners. The goals and objectives that follow were developed to address these concerns. Top Recommendations • The City of Oshkosh will continue to develop relationships with area businesses and institutions willing to invest in a First -Time Homebuyer Program within priority neighborhoods such as Middle Village. • When properties go into foreclosure or are put on the market the City of Oshkosh and other partners should tour them to determine if they are suitable for rehabilitation and marketing for future homeowners. • The City of Oshkosh will work with property owners to take advantage of State and Federal Historic Tax Credits and develop additional programming to incentivize quality rehabilitation of historic homes. • Engage property owners, residents, and business owners in a block -level program to address maintenance issues. • The Historic Plaque Program should be used to incentivize property owners who maintain their historic properties. A walking tour can be developed to market the neighborhood and create a sense of pride among residents and owners within the neighborhood. GOAL 1. INCREASE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE LEVELS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Encourage Oshkosh Habitat for Humanity, NeighborWorks Badgerland Community Development and similar organizations`fo rehabilitate homes within the neighborhood. Objective 2: Develop minimum maintenance checklist to aid in the development of Community Development a neighborhood "friendly reminder" in welcome basket. Objective 3: Utilize proactive code enforcement on properties with ongoing code Community Development violations. Objective 4: Compile list of neighborhood handymen willing to assist neighbors in MYNA need of lawn care or simple maintenance. Objective 5: Work with FVTC Horticulture Program to identify property owners Community interested in improving their landscaping. Development /MYNA /FVTC Objective 6: Develop programming to assist with exterior curb appeal projects. Community Development 22 GOAL 2. TAKE STEPS TO ENCOURAGE HIGHER - QUALITY HOUSING. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Recognize property owners who rehabilitate /keep up their properties. MYNA /Community Badgerland and similar organizations to use vacant lots for their new home. Development Objective 2: Develop programming to aid in the construction of garages and Community Development driveways. Development Objective 3: Develop programming to assist with lead screening and abatement Community Development Objective 4: Develop educational materials and supporting programming that Community encourage energy efficient updates to reduce expenses associated with older Development /SAB homes, making them more attractive to homeowners. Community Development Objective 5: Incentivize homeowners and investment property owners willing to Community Development restore the historic integrity of their home that has been lost due to inappropriate MVNA alterations. MVNA Objective 6: Eliminate permanent "for rent" signage in the neighborhood. Community Development GOAL 3. INCREASE HOMEOWNERSHIP RATE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Encourage Oshkosh Habitat for Humanity, NeighborWorks Community Development Badgerland and similar organizations to use vacant lots for their new home. Development Objective 2: Identify investment owners willing to sell their properties and MVNA /Community approach partners willing to rehab and convert them back to owner occupied Development dwellings. Objective 3: Install attractive pedestrian amenities in the neighborhood Community (decorative benches, free libraries, green space, neighborhood garden, etc.). Development /MYNA Objective 4: Explore the purchase of foreclosures to rehabilitate and sell to Community Development homeowners. Objective 5: Work with local realtors to host a neighborhood tour of homes. MVNA Objective 6: Create neighborhood marketing pieces for landlords, realtors and MVNA UW- Oshkosh. Objective 7: Identify programming to assist residents wanting to become Community Development homeowners that do not qualify for conventional financing. GOAL 4. ENCOURAGE LANDLORD INVOLVEMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Hold landlord meeting with neighborhood association to find out MVNA /Community how to collaborate to improve the neighborhood. Development Objective 2: Develop block -level curb appeal program for rental properties and MVNA /Community way to recognize participants. Development 23 Objective 3: Create contact list for neighborhood landlords to help distribute MYNA /Community information Development GOAL 5. ENCOURAGE TENANT INVOLVEMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Implementation Lead(s) Objective 1: Hold tenant meeting to identify needs and educate them on their MYNA /Community rights and responsibilities. Development Objective 2: Develop materials for "welcome packet" to address tenant rights and MYNA /Community responsibilities. Development ►,, Appendix.A Neighborhood Projects Middle Village Neighborhood Projects 16 414 310 304 242 2JE S g4l. g� as � gag m a 415 413 c W W � t Uj414 w r z m N y O z g � a Y 4z1 41J 409 Y Z ULII � U < Q gg m �B uS m s Sy m m m g 2J1 211 r 2209A 220.1A 119A 115 109 69] nIA 695 693 m $ 691 ❑ 6 679 W 669 a 665 set 659 655 6b F yy 69 W 6�3J IDAAVENl7E +d 21J ?1 99 625 U 8t9 m -Gs � 61] 815 81J G a 611 � 809 m 212A .; 11 60) 605 $ 219 212 209 202 dt., 1114 4 112 100 W'PARKINAYA�%ENUE 209 F I yy 119 11J 111 10J 1 .T � ti3A 111A tOL1 �terrace ree iannngs ,,OTrt OR Grant Recipien Planning Services Division Proiects Middle Village Property Assessment Cards Neighborhood Survey and Analysis Terrace Tree Plantings Blight Elimination Event - 118 W Parkway Neighborhood Planning Meeting Neighborhood Cleanup Event with Habitat for Humanity Street Reconstruction Targeted Mailing for Owner Occupied Rehab Program Dumpster Days with NeighborWorks S g$pp 39 $ g l---- U-1 W a F- Cn Z g c� C Z $ Fm S g H fFaI Neighborhood Association Projects Garbage Day Changed BBQ n' Blues Slam Neighborhood Breakfast Public Safty Meetings Monthly Neighborhood Walks National Night Out Event Neighborhood Survey Project Safe Passage for PubCrawlers Neighborhood Rummage Sale Neighborhood Cleanup Days �f Note: Projects as of March 2013 2 5 Middle Village Neighborhood Timeline: Oct 2010 - MVNA forms and begin meetings, neighbors organize petition for neighborhood park space, letters and attendance to Parks Board Fall of 2010 through 2013 - MVNA Monthly Neighborhood Walks with OPD which served as a catalyst for reducing drug and crime activity, as well as observations of property condition issues —this effort continued the de facto Neighborhood Watch Fall of 2010 through 2013 - Monthly and Quarterly Neighborhood Meetings May 2011 - MVNA Fundraiser rummage sale at Christ Lutheran Summer 2011- MVNA fundraiser bake sale at Farmer's Market August 2011- National Night Out Block Party —over 100 in attendance Fall 2011 -MVNA recommends a resident for a NeighborWorks homeownership consult November 2011- MVNA submits boundaries, purpose and bylaws and is formally recognized as a neighborhood in the city Fall 2012 - Fall Cleanup Dumpster Day, financial sponsor NeighborWorks —see slides ( http : / /www.wisconsinoutdoorfun.com/ apps /pbcs.dil /gallery? Site =UO &Date = 20111105 &Category =OSH01 - &ArtNo= 111050806 &Ref =PH) February 2012 - Everyday Heroes in Action — Dumpster Cleanup of Central Ave Property, Dumpster paid for by NeighborWorks Summer 2012 - Detailed inventory of neighborhood housing condition and WHEDA Blight Elimination Grant applied for (awarded in the fall 2012) Summer 2012 - Barbeque n Blues Block Party — over 50 people participating, partially . funded by NeighborWorks Summer 2012 - The Exiters Youth Bicycle Group informally forms Summer 2012 - Youth Planting Project — seeds and pots Summer 2012 - Four (4) Mini Grant projects, NeighborWorks administered Fall 2012 - Habitat for Humanity and MVNA Fall Blitz landscape and small repair resulting in neighbors and residents working together on 4 properties Fall 2012 - Demolition of 628 Franklin by owner Fall 2012 - Fall Fest for Kids — apple bobbing and costume gathering December 2012 - Demolition of 235 Ida, 654 Frederick and 118 W Parkway — City of Oshkosh 26 2012 — 2013 - Project Safe Passage (during Pub Crawl) twice a year by MVNA 2012 - 2013 - MVNA participates in NeighborWorks Resident Leadership Committee January 2013 - Survey of neighborhood residents, MVNA and intern in partnership with Planning Services Spring 2013 - Neighbors organize meetings regarding concentration of sex offenders, meet with representatives, suggest possible redistribution of the burden Spring 2013 - Visioning Sessions (2) at Christ Lutheran Summer and Fall 2013 - MV Action Planning Work Group Committee biweekly and monthly meetings to develop Goals and Objectives Summer 2013 - Christ Lutheran began offering monthly neighborhood meet and greet breakfast Summer 2013 - Three (3) Mini -Grant projects, NeighborWorks administered September 2013 - Change of Garbage Collection Day Fall 2013 - MVNA meets with Dept of Public Works to develop desired street reconstruction January 1, 2014 - MVNA Celebration and Open House for review of goals and objectives and concept planning for vacant lots on Ida and Parkway Jan 4, 2014 - MVNA meets with Planning Services to discuss and review implementation leads for part of the draft plan January 2014 - Submission of suggested planning documentation for final draft of neighborhood plan, provide Planning with numerous photos and documentation regarding background documentation 27 �1i� • i Neighborhood Maps z W e— FULTON AVE Middle Village z Zi v w o Neighborhood Association z °W z Boundary 9 W v _E E IRVING AVE AMHERST AVE co (n Cn V J O W � Z Uj N > UNION AVE Z v CyG Rc PARKWAY AVE V) z z Cn Q w r z W LL - LU v r o °9Z Y L) a q M RR TT A G P111J�Ir 11411:1, - '1`l0I'J'II'E)91 ad'Juo1 rdary ' N 1 in= 0.06mi 1 in = 300 ft 1 The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use, They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. These map(s) /datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or Printing Date: 11/8/2013 ,f Hf H appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes, They are provided "AS -IS" without Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI ON THE WATER warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse, z �141iaalr ` /i�Ila�Jr i`1ri�ii�J�riiJJ� 111,J! zoilthij. The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources, These map(s) /datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes, They are provided "AS -IS" without warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse, N 1 in= 0.06mi 1 in = 300 ft Printing Date: 11/8/2013 Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI f HKf H ON THE WATER N U z Y v J z z w O `n 0 IE t"'i LL VV 1F%V 11103 AV F_ E IRVING AVE z N W AMHERST AVE LL "' cn cn Y az (n W z .r N rZ 0 f UNION AVE J LU IDA AVE F_ W Q � WAY W PARK AVE � E PARKWAY AVE N f° - J I— cn � F- z Z O tl l Cn Y Q '9�c® ��e�L tiic O y q`F MERRITT AVE 11�!i a:1 l,+ `%1'I'� a!J r '►`1 i J It!J'!1'rlt, J J N 1 in = 0.05 mi 1 in = 250 ft The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. Printing Date: 1/3/2014 HK Of These map(s) /datasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or ,f appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided "AS -IS" without Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI ON THE WATER warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use or misuse. Blight Elimination Grant Kick Off Event Blight Elimination Grant & Kick -off Event — 1-1— vii U [ uFwj uia4, ivuvvv. Blight Indicators: 537 Tax Delinquent: 25 Resident Initiated Police Calls 1,235 (2009 -2012) Non -Owner Occupied Dwellings 101 Dwelling Units s Vacant Properties (as of 2012) 10 Foreclosures 22 Correction Notices (2007 -2012) 233 ti. 4 — 1-1— vii U [ uFwj uia4, ivuvvv. Blight Indicators: 537 Tax Delinquent: 25 Resident Initiated Police Calls 1,235 (2009 -2012) Non -Owner Occupied Dwellings 101 Dwelling Units 325 Vacant Properties (as of 2012) 10 Foreclosures 22 Correction Notices (2007 -2012) 233 *Data as of June, 2012 32 M r r< C O w � �1I i MAINE I t • . ! 1111111 • • 1 Source: City of Oshkosh Date: June, 201233 I , _ I r -- I I� M r r< C O w � �1I i MAINE I t • . ! 1111111 • • 1 Source: City of Oshkosh Date: June, 201233 Z *3 @3 Es MI Neighborhood Survey Neighborhood Survey In January of 2013, members of the neighborhood association worked with city staff to survey residents living in Middle Village. The survey asked residents to "Dream Big" and identify assets they valued and concerns they felt should be addressed within the neighborhood. Two sets of post cards were mailed with a link to an online survey and members of the neighborhood association went door to door to collect additional responses. The neighborhood association also sponsored a gift certificate giveaway as an incentive to fill out the survey. Throughout this effort, 58 responses were collected and the following graphs provide an in -depth look at current resident perceptions. Do you rent or own your home? OR Approximately 45% have lived in the neighborhood for over 5 years. Length of residencey is a key quality of life indicator when looking at the health of a neighborhood. If an individual is satisfied with their environment they are more likely to stay in their location. Neighborhoods with high rates of resident turn over tend to suffer from a lack of community and every effort should be taken to promote long term residency within Middle Village. o-.; own M Rent The survey was found to represent opinions of both renters and owners living within the neighborhood. The survey was designed to focus solely on resident opinions. The neighborhood association and staff discussed surveying investors and business owners at a later date because their needs tend to differ from residents living in the neighborhood. 34 How well do you know your neighbors? Very Well= Talk or get together once a week or more n Somewhat Well -,= talk or see each other occasionally Not Very WellnWe talk or see each other a couple tunes a year 0 N of At Al I� I do not k now my neighbor's name Of the 58 respondents, 35 were aware of the association and 23 were not. This is a huge opportunity for the association to focus on. Resident engagement will be a critical component in determining the future of Middle Village. Every effort should be taken to fully engage residents and success is likely to follow. Neighborliness is another important quality of life indicator when looking at the health of a neighborhood. Overall, the respondents indicated knowing each other well or somewhat well. Knowing your neighbors provides a sense of safety in your surroundings. It is also. much easier to know when someone or something is out of place. Twenty -three respondents confirmed attending events held by the neighborhood association over the last two years. Social activities have been one of the great successes for the neighborhood association. Continuing to provide opportunities for residents to get to know each other will need to remain a priority. 35 4 Which of the following characteristics do you value in your neighborhood? 80,0 °.ti - - - -_ -- _ -- - -- - -- - — 70.0% -- -- 40.0 °6 ; --- _ 30.0% zoo, 10.G% 0.0U - - - - _ NA �A Nc , (0 When asked what their biggest concerns were in the neighborhood, safety /crime, declining property conditions, and real estate market conditions were identified. Poor infrastructure also ranked high, however, in 2014 the remaining roads in poor conditon are scheduled for reconstruction. Proximity to downtown, walkability, and historic character were identified as the three characteristics most valued. These were further reinforced as assets while having conversations with residents thoughout the planning process. As a neighborhood, every effort should be taken to market and preserve these assets in the future. In the past 2 years has the neighborhood gotten better or worse? a Better Norse .1 Stayed the same Respondents were mixed when asked if the neighborhood has gotten better or worse over the last two years. It will be important to track this over time to see if efforts in conjuncition with the plan improve resident perceptions. 36 What are your biggest concerns about living in your neighborhood? 70.0Y6 _ _._ ___ ____ __.._. ._ -____ ____ __._.._ ..._ so o, .... -- - - -- _ 50 .0% ° "� _ __ __ _ . 400 ..._.� - -- — - 30 0 % `' - -- - _ - 20.0% _. _ ._ iao 0.00 A �.. t k J -.a In the past 2 years has the neighborhood gotten better or worse? a Better Norse .1 Stayed the same Respondents were mixed when asked if the neighborhood has gotten better or worse over the last two years. It will be important to track this over time to see if efforts in conjuncition with the plan improve resident perceptions. 36 Neighborhood Crime Data n z J z Y O m 235 4 •2371 `231A ® O • 677 675 623 ® 621 • 673 O 671 617 dP • • 6 9 667 O 61® • P iD 665 • ® m w 0. 00 e • 609 N m ® y m 807 6051 �1 659 O - .657 • r 108 655 • • fo' O 23B O 0m m O W IRVING AVE U Y o U W W K LL. IDAAVE J W PARKWAY AVE Middle Village Neighborhood Resident Initiated Police Calls 2009 -2012 119 •115 109 697 119A 695 0 693 ® ® 691 • m0 ° • 679 627 m • *00 677 675 623 ® 621 • O 673 O 671 617 O �� 0 • 6 9 667 O 61® N{� 1 • IA ® ° 665 • 611 00 e • 609 663 661 ® ® ® 807 6051 �1 659 O - .657 112 108 655 • • ®' 653 (651® • • O 649 B 647• O® ® 645 643 ryo • J 641 639 637 z O Z W U • a' 119 ®13A ®11`AO 627 • 625 • 623 ® 621 619 cam 617 O 615 O O 61® N{� 1 • IA • • 611 00 e • 609 R�qq 11�4A ® ® ® 807 6051 118 114 112 108 Legend Non -Owner Occupied Other Middle Village Properties = 1 Resident Initiated Police Call D., a' 119 ®13A ®11`AO 103Ae ® ® 0 °00 ® a 'n O N{� 1 • IA • • • • • • • B "10 ®• • ryo • Legend Non -Owner Occupied Other Middle Village Properties = 1 Resident Initiated Police Call D., General Assists 250 200 - ---- 17 ---- - - 3 19 1 150 . .... . . ....... . ------- 135 136 »General Assists 100 ------------ - .......... . . . ..... -- - ---- 50 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Community Service Calls 70 60 ----------- - ----------- 56 45 53 40 COMMUnity St.,rvico Calls 30 ---------- — ---------------- 20 - - ----- 10 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ... ....... . ... Crime Prevention 90 J . ...... . .. . . . ......... -h 86 80 - 79 79 ----- --- 60 -- ...__6.b._..._.._..._.. - -- 66-'- 60 - so —>—Crinw Prevention 40 ..... . . . .......... . ----- --- - ------ .......... . . .. . ......... 30 —_--_.__________..__-_._...__..__._---- 2a 10 ------------- 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ..... . ...... . 38 Drugs and Alcohol 80 70 ----------- - - ... . . ..................... 67 60 50 ,4 40 34 --------- - - -3 37 —o—Drugs and Alcohol 30 ------------ .... .. 20 . . . . . ......... . . ............ .... 10 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 – — — --------- --- — ------ ------ ------ Civil Issues —4—civil issues 39 Person Crimes 120 ----------------- - --- --- - 100 . .. . ...... so... . ........ - -0, 7S 60 ..... . . ..... . 63 —,1--Person Crimes 40 20 0 ------- - - ---- – -- _ - - - -- ------ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 -------------- ------------------ --- - -- Civil Issues —4—civil issues 39 Property Crimes Medical Cells property Crimes 40 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Traffic 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 — Traffic 41