Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout42. 14-38 DECEMBER 10, 2013 JANUARY 14, 2014 13-540 14-38 ORDINANCE FIRST READING SECOND READING (CARRIED___6-0_____LOST________LAID OVER________WITHDRAWN________) PURPOSE: APPROVE REZONING BLOCK BOUNDED BY WITZEL AVENUE, SAWYER STREET, SOUTHLAND AVENUE & JOSSLYN STREET (EXCLUDING 230 NORTH SAWYER) FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY, R-3 MULTIPLE DWELLING & C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY INITIATED BY: LOURDES ACADEMY PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30-16 (B) OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS. The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Section 30-16(B) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by changing the district character of the property bounded by Witzel Avenue, Sawyer Street, Southland Avenue and Josslyn Street (excluding 230 North Sawyer) from R-1 Single Family, R-3 Multiple Dwelling and C-2 General Commercial to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial with a Planned Development Overlay, per the attached map and described in the attached “Exhibit A”. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh enacted Ordinance #14-38 APPROVE REZONING BLOCK BOUNDED BY WITZEL AVENUE, SAWYER STREET, SOUTHLAND AVENUE & JOSSLYN STREET (EXCLUDING 230 NORTH SAWYER) FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY, R-3 MULTIPLE DWELLING & C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY on January 14, 2014. The full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the Office of the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave. and on the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us. Clerk's phone: (920) 236-5011. 'EXHIBIT A' From R -1 To C-1 PD: THE SOUTH 704 FEET OF THE WEST 651 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST % OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, ALL IN THE 6T" WARD, CITY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN. From R -3 To C -1 PD: THE SOUTH 363 FEET OF THE NORTH 625 FEET OF THE EAST 221 FEET OF THE WEST 651 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST % OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, ALL IN THE 6T" WARD, CITY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN. From C -2 To C -1 PD: THE NORTH 618 FEET OF THE WEST 651 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST Y OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 363 FEET OF THE NORTH 625 FEET OF THE EAST 221 FEET OF THE WEST 651 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST % OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, ALSO EXCEPTING LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #903 (DOC #567339 WINNEBAGO COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS) AND ADJACENT % OF NORTH SAWYER STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. R /� It • I NATIONAL AVE FAUST AVE aME 00191 0? L I ■ ■ WITZ4 AVE 0 �1(n El geVne The City of Oshkcsh.creales and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. These map(s)ldalasels are provided for Information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided "AS-IS' without warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use ormisuse. JA(3161(3 I 5_8ase_Maps*11annjrg Hase Map.mxd M 1 • Mt7m 16h1�6 �h4-11hz AM! Llma N 1 in = 0.04 mi 1 in =: 200 ft Printing Date: 1112012013 QJHKOf H Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, W1 ON THE WATER User: dadeneb r FAUST AVE aME 00191 0? L I ■ ■ WITZ4 AVE 0 �1(n El geVne The City of Oshkcsh.creales and maintains GIS maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. These map(s)ldalasels are provided for Information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided "AS-IS' without warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for use ormisuse. JA(3161(3 I 5_8ase_Maps*11annjrg Hase Map.mxd M 1 • Mt7m 16h1�6 �h4-11hz AM! Llma N 1 in = 0.04 mi 1 in =: 200 ft Printing Date: 1112012013 QJHKOf H Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, W1 ON THE WATER User: dadeneb ,,mI 1 • QJHKOf H OR THE WATER TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Darryn Burich Director of Planning Services DATE: December 5, 2013 RE: Approve Rezoning Block Bounded by Witzel Avenue, Sawyer Street, Southland Avenue, and Josslyn Street (Excluding 230 North Sawyer) From R -1 Single Family, R- 3 Multiple Dwelling and C -2 General Commercial to C -1 Neighborhood Commercial with a Planned Development Overlay (Plan Commission recommends approval) BACKGROUND The area included in the zone change request consists of two parcels totaling approximately 16 acres at 1100 Witzel Avenue and 250 North Sawyer Street. It is comprised of the entire block bounded by Witzel Avenue on the south, North Sawyer Street on the west, Southland Avenue on the north and Josslyn Street on the east except one Y2 acre property used as a dental office at 230 North Sawyer. The site currently includes the former Citizens First Credit Union building at 250 North Sawyer (corner of North Sawyer and Southland), administrative offices within the building at 111 Josslyn Street, and the Middle /High School (Grades 6 -12) building at 1100 Witzel Avenue. Other site features include a large parking area, storage garage and multiple athletic fields. ANALYSIS The petitioner is requesting approval to rezone the subject properties from multiple districts to C -1 PD to make a consistent zoning for the educational use and to consolidate operations onto the site to further develop the campus with a new elementary school and other site improvements. The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's institutional land use recommendation and the planned development overlay designation is beneficial to the petitioner as it provides flexibility needed to consolidate its proposed operations and allow for expansion of the campus by the utilization of base standard modifications. The planned development designation is beneficial to the City as it provides the ability to address items that do not meet code dimensional standards and grants public review and oversight of development plans. FISCAL IMPACT No impact is anticipated. RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission approved of this request at its November 19, 2013 meeting. Approved, o Cit anager ITEM: ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, R -3 MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT AND C -2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO C -1PD NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY FOR PROPERTIES AT 1100 WITZEL AVENUE AND 110 & 250 NORTH SAWYER STREET !LOURDES ACADEMY) Plan Commission meeting of November 19, 2013 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Lourdes Academy Owner: Oshkosh Catholic High School & Unified Catholic Schools of Oshkosh FNDT Action(s) Requested: Zone change request from the R -1 Single Family Residence District, R -3 Multiple Dwelling District and C -2 General Commercial District to the C -1 PD Neighborhood Commercial District with a Planned Development Overlay (PD). The subject area having multiple zoning designations restricts any site changes /improvements or new construction on the property. The intent of the requested zone change is to bring the zoning into conformance with the current use and development on the property and the PD will be in place to ensure that any proposed changes to the property be reviewed under the public hearing process while providing the ability for adjustments to zoning standards that are unique to its campus institutional use. Applicable Ordinance Provisions: The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning but relies on the Comprehensive Plan, development plans and good planning principles. Property Location and Background Information: The area included in the zone change request consists of two parcels totaling approximately 16 acres at 1100 Witzel Avenue and 250 North Sawyer Street. It is comprised of the entire block bounded by WitzeI Avenue on the south, North Sawyer Street on the west, Southland Avenue on the north and Josslyn Street on the east except one 1/2 acre property used as a dental office at 230 North Sawyer. The site currently includes the former Citizens First Credit Union building at 250 North Sawyer (corner of North Sawyer and Southland), administrative offices within the building at 111 Josslyn Street, and the Middle/High School (Grades 6 -12) building at 1100 Witzel Avenue. Other site features include a large parking area, storage garage and multiple athletic fields. Subject Site Existing Land. Use........ Institutional --- Lourdes Academy R -1, R -3 & C -2 Adjacent Land Use and Zoning Existrn Uses Zonin North Institutional — Zion Church (across Southland Ave) R -5 South Single and Two - Family Homes (across Witzel Ave) R -2 East Commercial and Multiple Family {across Josslyn St) R -4 & M -2 West Commercial and Institutional (N Sawyer St) C -1 & C-2 Comprehensive Plan LdW Use Recommendation =Land Use 10 Year Land Use Recommendation Public /Institutional & Commercial 20 Year Land Use Recommendation Public /Institutional & Commercial ANALYSIS The petitioner is requesting approval to rezone the subject properties from multiple districts to C -1PD. The purpose of the rezoning request is to make a consistent zoning for the educational use (through CUP) and to consolidate operations onto the site, thereby creating a one system campus and providing a mechanism (through PD) to further develop the campus with anew elementary school, expansionlrenovation of the existing parking lot, creation of a new parking lot, and reorganization of other site improvements such as athletic fields and accessory buildings. The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's institutional land use recommendation as school uses are permitted through a conditional use permit in the C -1 Neighborhood Commercial District, as it is in all the City's zoning districts. The C -1 designation is most appropriate in that it allows the development of the site as a large educational campus maintaining a scale of development that is appropriate and similar to the higher intensity commercial and multiple family uses on the west and cast while acting as transitional area to the lower density single and two - family residential uses to the south. The Planned Development designation is beneficial to the petitioner as it provides flexibility needed to consolidate its proposed operations and allow for expansion of the campus by the utilization of base standard modifications that provide relief from conditions affecting the use of multiple lots such as internal lot line setbacks and multiple drives /curb -cuts. The Planned Development designation is beneficial to the City as it provides the ability to address items that do not meet code dimensional standards and grants public review and oversight of development plans to ensure compliance with the City's development and planning policies. Lourdes held a neighborhood meeting to introduce the rezoning request and CUP/PD to the neighboring property owners and received only positive feedback. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the zone change from the R -1 Single Family Residence District, R -3 Multiple Dwelling District and C -2 General Commercial District to the C -1 PD Neighborhood Commercial District with a Planned Development Overlay as requested. The Plan Commission approved of the zone change from R -1 Single Family Residence District, R -3 Multiple Dwelling District and C -2 General Commercial District to C -1 PD Neighborhood Commercial District with a Planned Development Overlay as requested. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item. hen1 - Lourdes Academy Rezone 1Z Mr. Buck presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the zoning classifications and land use in said area. He reviewed the site plan which entailed both the existing features on the site as well as new proposed renovations. He discussed the existing features and the proposed additions to the site such as the elementary school, and new parking areas, pedestrian walkways, playgrounds, and athletic fields. He stated that the parking stalls would almost double from the number of existing stalls and explained the circulation patterns that would separate the various age groups. He also discussed the suggested adjustments to the plan that staff has recommended and reviewed the building elevations. He commented that the east fagade has a very blank wall and staff was recommending it receive some architectural and.color enhancement to break up the expanse of wall plane. He also reviewed the signage proposed for the site which included wall, ground mounted, and a pylon sign with one incorporating an electronic message center. He reviewed the plan depicting the traffic flow pattern for the site as well as a conceptual landscaping plan and the dumpster enclosure location. He stated that storm water management plans had yet to be submitted but would require review and approval by the Department of Public Works and the formal landscaping plans would require review and approval by the Department of Community Development. He also reviewed the conditions recommended for this request. Mr. Borsuk commented that he had concerns with the landscaping, environmental issues, and traffic patterns for the request. He questioned if the exit on to Sawyer Street should be a right turn only access. Mr. Buck responded that it should not be necessary as it is designed to be a three lane drive access. Chris Strong, Director of Transportation, added that Sawyer Street does not have a significant amount of crashes and this driveway should be able to work well as designed. Mr. Borsuk then commented that the storm water management for the site does not seem adequate. Steve Gohde, Assistant Director of Public Works, replied that the storm water management plans are conceptual only at this time and underground detention facilities will probably not be feasible on this site. He further stated that only the reconstructed areas have to come into compliance such as the new parking areas and storm water management will be challenging for this site as it is located very close to the downstream discharge area of Campbell Creek. Mr. Borsuk commented that it was a planned development and the whole site should be reviewed for storm water impact. He also questioned if they were proposing any intensive landscaping for areas of the site. Mr. Buck responded that some of the parking lot areas were to remain as they are today. Mr. Borsuk felt that the whole area along Sawyer Street needs more intensive landscaping features. Mr. Buck indicated that they are incorporating internal islands and other green space features and both the new and existing parking lots will meet all the current parking code requirements. Mr. Fojtik questioned why the new elementary school building is not being placed closer to and fronting the street than it is proposed. Mr. Buck replied that the petitioner have presented and worked with staff on four to five different scenarios while in the planning stages of the project and the drop - off/pick -up areas, site circulation and separation of school functions is the primary reason to not locate the building to front the street. Mr. Thorns stated that he is aware of the existing codes regulating landscaping and environmental requirements but there are existing storm water issues in the area and he felt they should be addressed as Ifein - Lourdes Academy Rezone this is a planned development and additional requirements could be requested. He commented that the city is attempting to hide parking areas at new developments as well and he felt more intensive landscaping should be required. He also commented about the base standard modification for the chain link fence around the ball field and felt that it did not have to be constructed of chain link and could utilize a more attractive material for the fencing. Mr. Buck responded that the petitioner is most Iikely considering the security and maintenance of the proposed fence. Mr. Thoms felt that they could use something to make the fencing more aesthetically pleasing than just the standard chain link. He also voiced concerns about the signage as he felt the electronic message center sign was located too close to the intersection and would be a distraction for drivers particularly at night. He also questioned if there were any impact studies completed for traffic flow as turning left on Sawyer Street can be challenging. Mr. Strong stated that the applicant did a parking assessment and after looking at other schools in the community, staff believe what is presented should be effective. A traffic impact analysis is typically done to determine if signals are needed in an area or other traffic measures required. He felt the streefs surrounding the property should be able to absorb the traffic flow other than there may be some back up at drop -off/pick-up times and the one way flow on the site could be more defined. Mr. Thoms inquired if the bus traffic flow would exit out on Sawyer Street. Mr. Strong responded that the entrance for the buses would be off Josslyn Street and the transfer point could be located on the school campus and that the buses would exit on Sawyer. Mr. Burich questioned if Mr. Strong felt the electronic message center sign was an issue. Mr. Strong indicated that they consider the proximity to the intersection and what is being displayed on the sign as both effect the distraction of drivers. He felt there was sufficient distance from the traffic light in this case that it should not be an issue. Mr. Bowen asked to verify that the corrugated metal material would be changed to other materials for the mechanical screening on the structure. Mr. Buck responded affirmatively. Mr. Bowen commented that an institutional zoning classification would make this process easier. Mr. Thorns questioned if the zoning change would have any effect on the dental office located within the block. Mr. Buck responded negatively. Mr. Thoms asked to verify that the mechanical equipment on the structure would be appropriately screened. Mr. Burich responded affirmatively. Mr. Borsuk inquired about the necessity to double the number of parking stalls on the site. Irene - Lourdes Academy Re�ome 4 Mr. Buck indicated that the daily demand was anticipated to be 260 parking stalls however with events at the school, the demand would require about 300 stalls and they would be removing some from the back of the old credit union location. Bob Biebel, President of Lourdes Academy, stated that they have presented a number of plans for this project to the city and their organization felt it was important to have a setup that would serve their students for the next 50 years. At this time, their education system is in three different buildings which is not convenient for parents and they felt it would be best to have all the schools in one location. They need to attract students and are trying their best as far as the traffic pattern on the site. Their parking lot is usually full during events and they utilize on- street parking besides, therefore the additional parking stalls are necessary for them to provide adequate parking on -site. They would like to maintain the entrance on Sawyer Street as it would provide an access point for emergency vehicles and the basement of the old credit union building could be utilized if necessary for emergency situations. He also discussed the need for the delivery area on site. Mr. Bowen inquired about the use of the football field. Mr. Biebel responded that it is a practice site for the middle school students which will amount to about six games per year and they will continue to utilize Titan Stadium for high school events. Mr. Thorns stated that if it was only a practice field, could they eliminate the chain link fencing surrounding it. He also commented that he would like to see landscaping around the perimeters of the parking lots to help hide these areas and he still had concerns about the storm water management issues. Tim Whitman, Davel Engineering, indicated that they would be working according to the City's ordinance with the use of biofilters and bioswales on the storm water management plans. Mr. Borsuk voiced his concern with the ramifications of the new building areas as far as storm water management. Mr. Gohde indicated that since the storm water management codes were revamped in 2012, the ordinance requires storm water management to be in effect on any newly created areas and they will have to meet all the current requirements. They have discussed lowering the football field area as they have done at Tipler School to serve as a detention area and biofilters are to be installed. He did not recommend extending storm water management beyond ordinance requirements in this case. Mr. Thorns discussed the ordinance standards but felt that since this was a planned development, it should require more stringent standards. Mr. Gohde reiterated his recommendations that ordinance standards are not required to be exceeded in this case as the subject site's close proximity to Campbell Creek which is just across Josslyn Street. Excessive storm water management will not help anyone upstream as the site is located downstream from the creek and there are no properties downstream to benefit from it either. He further discussed some other detention basins in the process of construction and stated that meeting ordinance standards will be difficult for this property but exceeding it is not necessary. Both the site location and elevation is an issue and he further explained current ordinance restrictions. Jason Hale, Ganther Construction, displayed large renderings of the east elevation and explained some of the changes incorporated to meet staff's recommendations. He also displayed samples of the brick, cast stone, architectural metal panels, and EIFS to be used on the structure. He discussed options for the replacement of the corrugated metal recommended in the conditions and the use of the interior of the Item - Lourdes Academy Re--one 5 structure which limits the placement of windows or other architectural features on this side for practical purposes. Mr. Cummings expressed his gratitude for the large renderings and material samples to review as he felt it was much more beneficial than just the usual submitted site plans. Mr. Borsuk questioned what the mechanical screening enclosures would look like. Mr. Hale responded that the lower portion would be constructed of brick and they were still considering the options for the replacement of the corrugated metal and offered a few options that would be possible. Mr. Borsuk then questioned if the refuse enclosure would be constructed of the same materials as the building. Mr. Hale indicated that it would be constructed of tan brick. Mr. Thorns stated that he still had concerns with the fencing material used to enclose the ball field and would like to see something more aesthetically pleasing than the chain link fence and also suggested that a berm could be constructed along the side of the parking lot. Mr. Hale replied that berming of any kind was an issue on this site due to the elevation but more landscaping may work better particularly along the Sawyer Street side. Mr. Thoms stated that he was also still concerned with the exit onto Sawyer Street. Mr. Hale indicated that decorative black fencing was proposed to be used in other areas of the site and the chain link fencing was the best option for the ball field as far as costs. Mr. Borsuk suggested that the chain link fence be coated rather than galvanized metal. Mr. Thorns inquired if this would be the only opportunity to amend the conditions for this request. Mr. Buck responded that the Commission could request that the item be brought back to amend conditions at a Iater date however it was important to approve the planned development so the project could move forward. The conditions could be amended at this time. Mr. Thorns stated that if staff could handle the facade, landscaping and fencing concerns discussed, the item would not need to come back to the Commission for further review and questioned if the conditions would require some amendments. Mr. Burich replied that if the Commission desired to request something specific, they need to be direct on what conditions should be amended. Mr. Fojtik commented that the fencing will be the least visible part of the property. Mr. Borsuk stated that he would be comfortable with the minimum standard of a coated chain link fence however he would like to see the ball field with this type of fencing rather than just standard chain link and some enhanced landscaping features along the fencing and on the Sawyer Street side parking lot and near the service drive by the cast facade. Mr. Hale suggested that the fence for the ball field could be vinyl coated on the exterior facing the street Item - Lourdes Academy Re_one and standard galvanized chain link on the interior which would be less visible to the public. Mr. Borsuk reiterated that he still had concerns with the storm water management for the site Mr. Gohde suggested that the Commission could amend the conditions to add approval of a storm water grading and drainage plan to collect and convey storm water to the maximum extent practical, although this may be difficult to accomplish. Mr. Bowen suggested that it could be adjusted to require the development to meet code standards and may exceed if possible. Ms. Propp inquired if the driveway on North Sawyer Street was still going to be removed as stated in the conditions. Mr. Buck commented that there are two existing driveways to the former credit union parking lot off Southland Avenue and the question is if the third driveway on Sawyer Street is necessary. Mr. Thorns discussed the emergency issues and use of the old credit union building for that purpose that the petitioner brought up earlier. Mr. Borsuk suggested that it could be restricted to a right - in/right -out only drive access. Mr. Burich commented that the site could be evacuated in an emergency situation without the third driveway to the parking lot and the right - in/right -out drive accesses do not historically work well. Mr. Buck added that a concern was that motorists will possibly avoid the controlled intersection at Southland and Sawyer by utilizing the parking lot accesses instead. Mr. Burich asked about the possibility of eliminating the drive aisles around the building which would prohibit the use of the driveways to avoid the controlled intersection. Mr. Biebel suggested that they could barricade off the driveway during the day to prevent its use for that purpose. Mr. Burich questioned why the drive aisles are necessary around the building. Mr. Biebel discussed the reasons for the necessity of the drive aisles such as to handle back -up traffic at busy times. Mr. Bowen recommended Ieaving the driveway remaining on Sawyer Street and review the situation after a few years to see if it was functioning properly. Mr. Fojtik commented that he felt the zone change and planned development overlay were a good idea for this development. Mr. Thorns recommended approval of the conditional use permit/planned development with adjustments to the conditions to address the enhancements to the ball field fencing, landscaping, storm water management, and to review the Sawyer Street driveway for functionality. Motion by Thoms to approve a zone change from R -I Single Family Residence District, R -3 Multiple Dwelling District and C -2 General Commercial District to C -IPD Neighborhood Business District with a Planned Development Overlay for properties at 1100 Witzel Avenue and 110 & 250 North Sawyer Street and to approve a conditional use permit /developmentplan review for the use and development plan of properties at 1100 Rtzel Avenue and 110 & 250 North Sawyer Street with the following conditions: Item - Lourdes Academy Rezone 1) Cross access agreement is established behveen two lots included in the subject campus area. 2) Base standard modifications: a. Allow a zero foot internal side yard setbacks from between the campus parcel and the administrative building /former credit union parcel. b. Allow six foot chain linkfencing within the Southland and Josslyn Street front yard setbacks with vinyl coated fencing on the exterior and enhanced landscaping around the perimeter. c. Allow accessory dumpster enclosure structures in front of the primary structure's Josslyn Street frontfagade at eighteen feet two inches. 3) Require lane narrowing measures at the internal drive intersection of the elementary school drop - off /pick -up and service delivery drive, as approved by the Director of Transportation. 4) Access Control Variance to allow seven existing and proposed driveways to access the campus property and allow the three -lane North Sawyer Street driveway to be 36 feet wide at the property line and 46 feet wide at the curb. S) Access Control Variance to allow the two Southland Avenue driveways and one North Sawyer Street driveway to the administrative building /farmer credit union property with review of the North Sawyer Street driveway by the Department of Transportation in two years following occupancy. 6) The elementary school's eastfaVade receive architectural and color enhancements as well as landscaping meant to break tip the expanse of wall plane, as approved by the Department of Community Development. 7) Replace the corrugated metal with alternative mechanical screening material, as approved by the Department of Community Development. 8) Landscaping should be enhanced for buffering on the street side of parking lot perimeters. 9) Approval of a storm water grading and drainage plan to collect and convey storm water, to the maximum extent practical. Seconded by Cummings. Motion carried 7 -0. Item - Lourdes academy Rezone S 0 City of Oshkosh Planning Services REZONING 215 Church Avenue PO Box 1130 Oshkosh, W154903 -113p 0-�KO� APPLICATION Oh NEWATM 920 -236 -5059 Propertyy and Project infa�matlon' ` r "'' s Property Address: Parcel Number: r p O OL6 9MIe6 Existing Zone District Lot Size Frontage��ft. Depth: - ft. Area: ISM Acres /Scl Ft ❑ Rectangle V1 Irregular Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Designation R bl i G S-}� _ 4�4J L ..4 Current use of property 61C�Jccr+�� Proposed use of property- .. 6 0 uC G f1 d . 1 Proposed Zone District Legal Description (to be provided in digital form, MS Word format) Lp6 G I LL_ Mailing Address a 1.) steXL7 K. -S T— Fax City CISH-ICD& ff State W—E- Zip SY9* E -Mail 616feLel E. 10- 2. - Applicant Interest The applicant must have a legal interest in the subject property; Property Owner ❑ Purchaser by Option or Purchase Agreement ❑Purchaser by Land Contract ❑ Lessee /Tenant 3. Property Owner ❑ Check here if Applicant is also Property Owner Identify the person or organization that owns the subject property: Name R© 6PA.i 3 1 , e a C. Cell Phone Organization Looryg l_Atet Y ! OS 4 _- Business Phone L70`0 — 43E 3 ta-k Mailing Address C?_z 5c,t"VEIL- _ Fax City 0_�fifcw State w Zip E -mail Ut 6e 0IouaGes cr,�se:�, OsH�ts�i_e'a.0 Page 2 of 7 9/14/2011 1A Recfu� r pticafionAtiachments ::�Y,<<�Yw� ❑ 1. Need for Zone Change Written description of why the zone change is needed, and how the proposed zone district will meet the needs of the development. ❑ Z. Project Description Written description of the proposed site and /or building layout, building and structure design information, floor plans, parking calculations, current environmental conditions, and other pertinent information. ❑ 3. Site Plans, Building Elevations, Floor Plans, and Landscape Plans If. .Flanned Development approvalm is. being requested:concurrentlywith thezone"changerequest ,'enclose the site plans, building elevations, floor plans, and landscape plans required on the Site Plan Review Checklist. ❑ 4. Conditional Use Permit Application (if necessary) If applicable, include a completed Conditional Use Permit application with the zone change submittal. ❑ S. Planned Development Application (if necessary) If applicable, include a completed Planned Development Application with the zone change submittal. 1 The applicant must read the following statement carefully and sign below: The undersigned requests that the City of Oshkosh review this application and related required documents and site plans. The applicant further affirms and acknowledges the following; That the applicant has a legal interest in the property described in this application. That the answers and statements contained in this application and enclosures are in all respects true and correctto the best of his, her, or their knowledge. That the approval of this application does not relieve the undersigned from compliance with all other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance or other codes or statutes, and does not constitute the granting of a variance. hat the applicantwill comply with any and all conditions imposed in granting an approval of this application. If also the owner, the applicant grants the City of Oshkosh staff, Plan Commission, and Common Council the right to access the subject propertyfor the sole purpose of evaluating the application. Applicant Signature Applicant Signature Date Date If the applicant is not the property owner, the property owner must read and sign below: The undersigned affirms and acknowledges that he, she or they are the owner(s) of the property described In this application, and: ❑ Is /are aware of the contents of this application and related enclosures. ❑ Authorizes the applicant to submit this application and represent the undersigned in the matter of being reviewed by the City of Oshkosh. ❑ Grants the City of Oshkosh staff, Plan Commission, and Common Council the right to access the subject property for the sole purpose of evaluating the application. Property Owner Signature Property Owner Signature Date Date Page '3 of 7 9/14/2011 A) REZONING Review Standards Standard #1 Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Ordinance A. Explain how the proposed zone district designation is consistent with the purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Map. The future designation of the property is Public /Institutional, which is how the site is currently being utilized and how it will continue to be used. B. Explain how the purposed zone district will further the themes and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as well as any relevant adopted area redevelopment plans. The proposed Zone District will allow Lourdes Academy the flexibility needed to consolidate operation on to one site and continue to operate and maintain the property for educational use which is in -line with the cities comprehensive plan for the property as Public/ Institution use. Standard #2 Public Facilities A. Describe how adequate public utilities already exist or will be provided at no additional public cost, and will safeguard the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the public. The presence of existing utilities on both Josslyn and Sawyer Street are available for the project. New storm water retention and treatment will have a positive effect of the existing site ad the addition of on site parking will help alleviate street parking. B. Explain how the proposed zone district will not be detrimental to the financial stability and economic welfare of the city. C1 and C2 zones already exist in this area and the actual use of the property will not be changing from the current use. C1 zoning will allow Lourdes Academy the operational flexibility to remain a vibrant Catholic education option for years to come. Standard #5 Other Describe how the purposed zone district is consistent with the trend of development in the neighborhood, or the property to be rezoned was improperly zoned or classified when the City's Zoning Ordinance was adopted or amended. Sawyer St, is a mix of residential and commercial uses The current site is in a transitional area between these uses. Rezoning to C1 "Neighborhood Business District" will allow for development of site to best utilize the site and still maintain a scale of development appropriate for the surrounding area. 12- PD /REZONE /ACV 1100 WITZEL AV & THOMAS L SCHMIDT CHRISTINE M CUSHMAN 110 & 250 N SAWYER ST 1083 DURFEE AVE 1091 DURFEE AVE PC: 11 -19 -13 OSHKOSH WI 54902 5770. OSHKOSH WI 54902 5770 STEPHEN P VANMUN 1203 WITZEL AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 5658 ROBERT A/M JANE REIGH 1121 WITZEL AVE . OSHKOSH WI 54902 5721 NICHOLAS L KOZENKA 1103 WITZEL AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 5721 ZION EVAN LUTH CHURCH 400 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 549.02 4291 UNIFIED CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF OSHKOSH FOUN 110 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902' 5696 SUBLUXATION PROPERTIES LLC 155 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 5674 PHILLIP A /JUNE E BAKER 230 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 4200 JERICHO-ROAD MINISTRIES 429 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 4253 RONALD FRANKLIN SR 1079 DURFEE AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 5770 LEZ PROPERTIES LLC. 621 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 3356 THOMAS POESCHL JR 425 W 19TH AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 6817 BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV OF WIS SYS 800 ALGOMA BLVD OSHKOSH WI 54901 8601 LASER INVESTMENTS LLC 502 W MURDOCK AVE OSHKOSH WI 54901 2214 OSHKOSH ATTORNEYS PROPERTIES LLC 141 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 5674 JAI NAV DURGA MA LLC 305 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 4252 OSHKOSH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL 111 JOSSLYN ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 3471 RAJA PROPERTIES LLC 251 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 4251 ROSE MARY SHELDON 1127 WITZEL AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 5721 JEFFREY /CARRIE M SCHMUDE 1107 WITZEL AVE, OSHKOSH WI 54902 5721 KAREN L WEDDE- 1055 WITZEL AVE OSHKOSH WI 54902 5719 MIDWEST TACO PROPERTIES. LLC 3038 WOODRIDGE DR OSHKOSH WI 54904 7628 MR /MRS DENNIS W SMITH 2843 SUNSET POINT LN OSHKOSH WI 54904 1006 ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH 200 JOSSLYN ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 3497 CITY OF OSHKOSH PO BOX 1130 OSHKOSH WI 54903 1130 LOURDES ACADEMY 250 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 B IV Y7 The City of Oshkosh geates and maintains GI8 maps and data for its own use. They may show the approximate relative rotation or propeft boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources. These map(s )Idatasets are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes, They are provided 'A5 -IS" wihout warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no Gabifity for use or misuse. JAGISINaningTian Commission Site Plan Map TempiaLlPlan Commission Site Plan MapTemplate.mxd N 1 in= 0.04mi tin =190(1 Printing Date: 11/512013 Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI 4 OfHKO,IH oN ME WATER User 1� The City of Oshkosh creates and maintains GIS maps and data for ifs own use. They may show the approximate relative Iocalion of prop8q, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources, These map (s)ldatasels are provided for information purposes only and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided 'AS -IS' without warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no Uabirity for use or misuse Commission Sile Plen Map TemplaleTlan Commission Silo Plan Map Templale.mA N tin =0.19rni 1 in = 1,000 fl Printing Date: 1115/2013 Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI 0YHKOYH ON THE WATER User- deboraV 15 The Qty of Oshkosh creales and maintains GIS maps and data for ils own use. They may show the appropmate relative location of property, boundaries and other feature from a variety of sources' These map(s)ldalasels are provided for information purposes onty and may not be sufficient or appropriate for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. They are provided `AS -IS' without warranties of any kind and the City of Oshkosh assumes no lability for use or misuse. LGISTIanningWlan Commission Silo Plan Map TemplaleTlan Commission sile Phan MapTsmplale mxd 7$iVzl k r Y '14�. }j 1 in = 0,04 mi tin =190 ft Printing Date: 11/5/2013 Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI OfHKOfH OH THE WATER User. de:orhf 1�