HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes__________________________________ Plan Commission Minutes 1 August 20, 2013 PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES August 20, 2013 PRESENT: David Borsuk, Ed Bowen, Jeffrey Thoms, Tho mas Fojtik, John Hinz, Steve Cummings, Robert Vajgrt, Karl Nollenberger EXCUSED: Kathleen Propp, Donna Lohry STAFF: David Buck, Principal Planner; Jeffrey Nau, Associate Planner; Deborah Foland, Recording Secretary Chairperson Fojtik called the meeting to order at 4 :00 pm. Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present. The minutes of July 16, 2013 were approved as prese nted. (Nollenberger/Bowen) I. EXTRATERRITORIAL LAND DIVISION/CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP AT 2788 KNOTT ROAD IN THE TOWN OF OMRO The owner/petitioner is requesting a land division/certified survey map splitting portions of two existing parcels to create a third parcel containin g a total of 5.008 + acres. Mr. Nau presented the item and reviewed the site an d surrounding area. He explained the reasons for the proposed land division and stated that the Depa rtment of Public Works has made a few recommendations to be forwarded to Winnebago County for the final CSM and discussed said recommendations. Mr. Borsuk questioned why the recommendations were not made conditions of approval on the staff report. Mr. Nau responded that the City no longer has the a uthority to require conditions on extraterritorial land divisions but forwards concerns to the County. Motion by Nollenberger to approve the extraterritor ial land division for property located at 2788 Knott Road in the Town of Omro. Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 8-0. II. GRANT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOC ATED AT 713 S. SAWYER STREET (KILLIAN G. SPANBAUER FIELD) AT&T is requesting the City of Oshkosh to grant a p rivate utility easement to allow placement of a fiber cabinet at Killian G. Spanbauer Field. The p roposed easement has two parts consisting of a six-foot wide by 31.83 foot long non-exclusive easement coming off of S. Sawyer Street and an adjacent eight-foot by twelve-foot exclusive easement to the west. Mr. Nau presented the item and reviewed the site an d surrounding area. He explained the reasons for the easement request and the expansion of AT&T serv ices. He reviewed the easement area and indicated that the City would be working with AT&T to have appropriate documents signed and recorded at the Winnebago County Register of Deeds if the proposed easement was approved.
__________________________________ Plan Commission Minutes 2 August 20, 2013 Mr. Hinz questioned if the easement area would crea te any interference with the parking lot for the ba ll diamond. Mr. Nau responded that the easement area would be s outh of the parking area and any paved surfaces and should not be an issue. Motion by Vajgrt to approve the granting of the pri vate utility easement for property located at 713 S. Sawyer Street (Killian G. Spanbauer Field). Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 8-0. III. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROG RAM Staff requests review and acceptance of the 2014 Ca pital Improvement Program (CIP). The purpose of this review is for the Plan Commission to make a determination of consistency of the proposed programs and activities in the 2014 CIP with the Ci ty’s Comprehensive Plan, official maps, or other planned activities. Mr. Buck presented the item and stated that it was a five year plan however only the first year was being reviewed for acceptance and consistency at th is time. Steve Gohde, Assistant Director of Public Works, st ated that the document outlines major projects for the City in the upcoming year such as streets, util ities, sidewalks, traffic, parks, equipment, and ta x increment financing districts improvements. He ind icated that other years beyond 2014 were merely estimates at this time and is subject to change. H e passed around a map depicting the areas scheduled for improvements in the 2014 CIP. Mr. Cummings stated that he noticed the Edgewood Vi llage Subdivision was listed in the CIP for concrete pavement work and inquired if the issues h ad been worked out as he was aware that this subdivision has been in a state of contention for q uite some time. Mr. Gohde responded that the funding listed in the CIP was an estimated value for required street work and they would still have to contact all parties in volved prior to proceeding with any street construction. He further explained that there were still issues between the bank and the developer an d assessments would have to be completed and explaine d the process involved with new developments. Mr. Cummings inquired if the homeowners in the deve lopment would be assessed for the improvements. Mr. Gohde responded affirmatively. Mr. Borsuk questioned how funding was set aside for developer’s agreements in these situations. Mr. Gohde explained the circumstances of this parti cular development and stated that internally the City has taken steps to prevent some of the issues with this situation from occurring in the future. Mr. Thoms inquired how the Bicycle and Pedestrian P lan was being addressed in the CIP as he did not see anything related to it in the document or if it was handled as an item in the Transportation Department’s regular budget. He also questioned wh en street reconstruction is taking place if it includes any improvements related to the Bicycle an d Pedestrian Plan.
__________________________________ Plan Commission Minutes 3 August 20, 2013 Mr. Gohde indicated that striping for the bicycle l anes would usually be an item that would come out of the Transportation Department’s budget and descr ibed the process of how expenses were allocated from either the Department’s budget or capital impr ovement expenditure. He further explained how the bicycle lanes would be handled to the best of h is knowledge and stated that it should be included when street reconstruction is being completed. He further commented that there may be a few streets listed in this years CIP however he did not have de tails on how the striping and signage for the bicyc le lanes would be handled. Chris Strong, the Transit Department Director, was not present to offer any further information on this matter. Mr. Borsuk commented that there was not that much d etail included in the CIP plan compared to the past. Mr. Thoms questioned if the central garage had expe nditures in both this year and 2014’s CIP. Mr. Gohde replied that the 2013, 2014 and 2015 CIP all had funding included in it for the reconstruction of the central garage. Mr. Fojtik commented that the southwest corner of 9 th Avenue and Washburn Street was referenced in the storm water section of the CIP and questioned i f that was the area behind the A&W Restaurant. Mr. Gohde responded affirmatively. Mr. Bowen stated that the replacement of the water tower in 2014 or 2015 in the Marion Road area was referenced and questioned if this expenditure w as included in previous CIP’s. He stated that the item was an expenditure for a study and questioned if this study was going to consider other locations for the tower. Mr. Gohde replied that the City has researched othe r locations for the water tower however it was determined that it needs to be located in this prox imity. Mr. Bowen then questioned what the study provided f or if not relocation. Mr. Gohde indicated that part of it was for actual design components and the need to do some aesthetic planning for it since it could not be relocated. Mr. Bowen also commented about the funding allocate d for the Marion Road Redevelopment Area Remediation and questioned what was going to be com pleted as he thought the environmental contamination issues were already addressed. Mr. Gohde responded that there were some current an d proposed projects in that area and heavy contamination is an existing condition on that site . Any further details would have to be directed to the Director of Community Development, Allen Davis, who was not present at today’s meeting. Mr. Borsuk inquired if this remediation was being d one in anticipation of a development project or one that was already in hand. Mr. Buck replied that there are some development pl ans in process and grant funding has and is being pursued through the EPA and other entities.
__________________________________ Plan Commission Minutes 4 August 20, 2013 Mr. Cummings commented about the funding allocated for riverwalk projects and stated that it does not mention docks and questioned if they were inclu ded. Mr. Gohde responded that it would be another questi on that would require a response from Mr. Davis. Mr. Thoms commented that the north side of the rive rwalk was complete and questioned if any type of fencing or railing was going to be installed along the river. Mr. Gohde responded negatively and stated that the Parks Department or Community Development would have to address questions on the development of the riverwalk. Mr. Thoms stated that the City was planning for a l awsuit by constructing this without any fencing or railing to prevent citizens from falling in the riv er and felt that the Plan Commission approved this plan with fencing or railing along the river’s edge. Mr. Cummings commented that that scenario would be similar to trying to fence off Lake Winnebago. Mr. Thoms indicated that he felt this was different as it was a high pedestrian area and bad planning to not include fencing or railing as it is more pruden t in areas with a lot of pedestrian traffic and it makes no sense to him to not have included this safety fe ature. Mr. Hinz stated that he did not see anything schedu led for the reconstruction of Oregon Street in the CIP. Mr. Gohde responded that the reconstruction was on the fringe of planned projects however some items had to be reshuffled to make funding availabl e for other projects and the reconstruction of Oregon Street should appear in next years CIP for 2 019 consideration. Mr. Borsuk questioned why asphalt was being propose d for street reconstruction on heavy industrial streets instead of concrete. Mr. Gohde replied that funding availability was an issue and the asphalt should last until complete reconstruction of those streets was scheduled to be done. Mr. Borsuk commented that asphalt only has about a ten year life span in industrially used areas. Mr. Bowen stated that the 2015 CIP had some deferre d land acquisition costs and questioned what that was referencing. Mr. Gohde responded that Mr. Davis would have to ad dress that issue. Mr. Borsuk commented that there seemed to be a numb er of questions relating to the Community Development Department that could not be addressed and hoped that they will be revisited at the Common Council meeting to obtain answers. Mr. Nollenberger stated that the staff report refer s to the Plan Commission’s role with the CIP was to make a determination of consistency of the proposed programs and activities with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and therefore did not require a more detailed review of all the items contained in it.
__________________________________ Plan Commission Minutes 5 August 20, 2013 Mr. Thoms stated that he was willing to accept that the CIP was not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan although he may not agree with a ll the funding allocations and he was not satisfied that there were numerous questions that c ould not be answered. Mr. Borsuk commented that the Plan Commission can a gree that they received the document and was approving it going forward to the Common Council fo r their review. Motion by Vajgrt to approve that the 2014 Capital I mprovement Program budget is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Seconded by Nollenberger. Motion carried 8-0. PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT There was no planning director’s report as Mr. Buri ch was not present. There being no further business, the meeting adjour ned at approximately 4:35 pm. (Vajgrt/Borsuk) Respectfully submitted, David Buck Principal Planner