HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
MINUTES OF THE LONG RANGE FINANCE COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 1, 2010
ROOM 406
The meeting of the Long Range Finance Committee was held on Wednesday, December 1, 2010,
in Room 406, at Oshkosh City Hall, 215 Church Avenue.
The meeting was called to order by Chair Harold Buchholz, at 5:05 p.m.
Members Present: Harold Buchholz, Bryan Schulz, Don Simons, Jeffrey Thoms, Burk Tower,
Staff Present: Peggy Steeno-Finance Director, and Lori Burns–Administrative Assistant
Absent: Jeffrey Herzig, Jason Hirschberg, and Bob Poeschl
Others Present: U W O Student
I.APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 3, 2010 MINUTES
Amendment made by Chair Buchholz to show Ben Schneider as absent. Moved to change
and approve by Thoms, seconded by Bryan Schulz. Motion passed unanimously.
II.CITIZEN INPUT
1 attendee - UW-O student in the MPA Program observed meeting as part of a class
requirement.
Information Provided
Buchholz briefed the committee on the open position and members shared information on
a possible candidate for the vacant position. Thoms asked if any people, due to their
professional positions, would not be allowed to serve on the committee, and it was
confirmed that that would not be an issue. As long as there is no direct conflict in
serving, all would be considered.
Follow-Up - There was a discussion on how often the committee should meet; monthly or
every other month. Even though the enabling ordinance states that it is every other
month, the committee can decide if they would like to meet more often. Those present felt
there is plenty to discuss for the continuation of monthly meetings but would like to hear
the opinions of the other members first. Absenteeism was also brought up and the
question posed was, is there a rule about missing a certain number of meetings before
you are off the committee. Staff does not believe there are any rules to that affect.
It was decided that this item (monthly or every other month meetings) would be placed on
the January meeting agenda so that the committee could have a formal discussion and
vote on this matter.
Steeno provided information on the upcoming tax rate and final budget.
III.CITY FEE PROJECT – Wrap up
(~5:10-5:55)
1.Review/Finalize Cover Memo
Thoms suggested the Taxpayer Alliance Study be included in the packet that gets sent
to the Council to establish a point of reference as to where Oshkosh stands in regard
to other Wisconsin communities. Thoms suggested adding to the second line of the
first paragraph, “and ongoing maintenance of these fees.” Schulz recommended
adding that best practices methods were utilized in the creation of the process.
Tower suggested explaining the 30% in the second paragraph and discussing the
dollar amount the fees make up of the 65 million dollar budget.
2.Discuss Draft Recommendations to Council
Under the “RECOMMENDATION” section, Schulz recommended that the committee
suggest that the Council become very active with this, getting it out there for public
education by means of the newspaper and the possible use of OCMS.
There was a discussion on the statutory fees, and the options involved with covering
costs for those fees. Simons questioned whether Ambulance and Transit were run as
enterprise funds. Neither of these is operated in that manner, differences were
discussed. Thoms discussed having ambulance run by itself, the cost split between
ambulance services and firefighting services, and inside and outside the city rates
(shared services), and the committee decided to add this as a future discussion /
ongoing topics list.
Steeno shared an example of the Fee Analysis form that would be used by the City.
Suggestions made were; add a date area at the bottom, add an area for annualized
impact, add an area to show what departments are all involved in the particular fee.
The labor area was discussed; committee would like to make sure that the labor rates
are based on the full costing method, including benefits. In addition, the committee
would like to suggest that Council use this same process to assist in deciding if newly
proposed fees should be adopted.
Staff will make all requested changes and resubmit to committee members early in
the week of 12/6 so that committee can give the final ok and the entire
recommendation packet can be forwarded to Council on 12/10. The City Manager
will report to the Council on 12/14 that the committee has provided the
recommendation and ask the Council to review prior to a discussion in 2011.
IV.INVESTMENT POLICY
(~5:55 - 6:20)
Review of State Statues and Current City Investment Policy
Steeno introduced the investing requirements as outlined in State Statutes and the current
policy, and gave an overview on where we are at...policy hasn’t been updated in a
number of years, what the statutes allow, what kind of balances we have, security, the
funds that flow through the City, etc. However, this is not a high priority at this time.
The committee would like some time to review and discuss in the future. The plan is still
to review the current policy, and recommend updates to the Common Council at some
point in the future. Staff will continue providing the committee with investment
information and the discussion will be continued in the future.
V.SINKING FUND POLICY
(~6:20 – 6:55)
Discuss the Potential Creation of a Policy and Brainstorm on Policy Details
The discussion on a potential sinking fund was brought up at the last council meeting,
and the Council is interested in the development of a policy that will help the City fund
future capital purchases and certain types of projects. Steeno explained the Capital
Outlay section of the budget and the City’s Five Year Capital Improvement Plan.
The Committee does not agree with the name that has been attached to this policy. It
should not be called a “Sinking Fund Policy”, and some suggestions as to what would be
more appropriate were brought up. This will be discussed in more detail at the next
meeting. The committee will also be defining, in detail, what the policy and fund would
cover and what it would not cover. The committee will also discuss options for funding
these items and how the saving and spending would occur. The newly created policy
needs to be comprehensive in that it needs to cover all City needs of this type, not just
certain areas.
Staff will put together a discussion packet for the January meeting so that the committee
can begin detailed discussions on this topic.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Schulz, Second by Simons, to adjourn. Motion passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.