HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-304JULY 13, 2011
11 -304 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7 -0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN
PURPOSE: APPROVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A STAND ALONE RESTAURANT, STAND ALONE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND COMMERCIAL STRIP CENTER
AT 1200 SOUTH KOELLER STREET
INITIATED BY: RMA ARCHITECTS, INC, PETITIONER
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w /conditions
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a planned
development to construct a free standing restaurant, a free standing retail building and a
multi- tenant commercial strip center, to be developed in phases, per the attached, is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
1) Base standard modification to setbacks:
a. Reduced front yard setback for parking from 25 feet to 0 -8 feet.
b. Reduced front yard setback for signage from 25 feet to 10 -14 feet.
c. Reduced front yard setback for building from 50 feet to 8 foot.
d. Reduced rear transitional yard setback for dumpsters from 25 feet to 20 feet.
e. Reduce the north side yard setback for paving from 15 feet to 0 feet.
2) Approve access control variances:
a. Permit two driveway accesses to the property.
b. Reduce the lateral clearance requirement from 75 feet to 45 feet.
3) Establish a walk directly from the freestanding retail structure entrance to the
public sidewalk and remove the pedestrian walk connection to the property to the
east.
4) Provide proof of cross - access agreements between the subject property and the
properties adjacent to the north and the south.
5) Base standard modification to reduce the required landscaping, as approved by
the Department of Community Development.
6) Stormwater management, grading and erosion control plans be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works.
7) Final approval of building elevations for the strip center structure.
8) Approval of a master wall sign plan for strip center with the intent that signage
styles be uniform on the structure.
9) Detention basin is designed without riprap above the water line and native plants
be planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety
shelf.
A
OIHKO.IH
ON THE WATER
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Buric
Director of Plannmg Services
DATE: July 7, 2011
RE: Approve Planned Development for Construction of a Restaurant, Commercial Building
and Commercial Strip Center at 1200 South Koeller Street (Plan Commission
recommends approval)
BACKGROUND
The approximate 6.3 acre property is the former home to the 60,000 square foot Copps Grocery Store
located at 1200 South Koeller Street, which has been removed from the site as well as the 1,750 square
foot Sonic Drive -In Restaurant at 1180 South Koeller Street, which is now vacant and proposed to be
removed from the site. The property is located approximately 1,000 feet south of West 9 th Avenue and
approximately 550 feet north of Menard Drive. There is a 20 foot stormwater and sanitary sewer
easement along the eastern property line as well as a 75 foot ANR pipeline easement cutting diagonally
at the southwest corner of the property. Staples, Hobby Lobby, Starbucks and other retail
establishments are adjacent to the north and Shopko is adjacent to the south. Highway 41 to the west
and residential uses exist to the east.
ANALYSIS
This request involves the redevelopment of the commercial property creating three freestanding
buildings: 1) restaurant; 2) retail building; and 3) a three -unit commercial retail /restaurant strip center.
The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with surrounding
commercial uses in the area. The restaurant is proposed to be placed at the northwest corner of the
property with the retail building at the southwest corner and the commercial strip center in the center
of the parcel. The development plan requires base standard modifications to the dimensional
regulations for the front yard setback for parking, signs, and the retail building as well as rear
transitional yard setback for parking and the dumpster enclosure and side yard setback for paving. The
Plan Commission did not support the reduced rear transitional yard setback for parking along the east
property line adjacent to the residential uses. Access to the development is proposed to be provided by
two full access drives from South Koeller Street with cross accesses from the property to the north and
to the south. An access control variance will be necessary for two drives and to reduce the lateral
clearance of the internal drive aisle from the street curb. Pedestrian connections are provided in the
form of formal walks on the south property line and at the center of the site with each structure
connecting to these walks. Proposed parking includes 384 parking stalls which meets the Zoning
Ordinance requirements and a lighting plan has not yet been submitted but will be required to meet
code standards. Signage for the site is proposed in the form of two internally illuminated pylon signs
on S. Koeller Street and wall mounted signage for both the restaurant and retail structure which meets
code requirements. Signage for the strip center has not been included but will be required to meet
standards when submitted. Landscaping is depicted along the perimeter and inside landscaped islands
requiring a base standard modification to reduce the quantity below code requirements. Stormwater
management is not required at this location because the amount of impervious surface will actually
decrease however the applicant is providing a retention area at the southwest corner of the lot to
accommodate some additional stormwater capacity. Formal stormwater management, grading, and
erosion control plans will be required to be approved by the Department of Public Works during the
building permit process. Building elevations for the restaurant and retail center are 20 and 24 feet
respectively and both structures meet the architectural standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The strip
center structure does not have submitted elevation plans at this time and will require final approval by
the Department of Community Development when submitted.
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated other than a taxable real estate and personal property from the two buildings that are
anticipated to be built later this summer /fall and be occupied as of January 1, 2012.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission approved of this request at its July 5, 2011 meeting.
Approved,
City Manager
ITEM: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
RESTAURANT, COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND COMMERCIAL STRIP
CENTER AT 1200 SOUTH KOELLER STREET
Plan Commission meeting of July 5, 2011
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Laura Kroll, RMA Architects, Inc.
Owner: Sonic of Oshkosh, LLC and 1200 South, LLC
Actions Requested:
The petitioner requests approval of a Development Plan for the development of a restaurant,
commercial building and commercial strip center at 1200 South Koeller Street.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria and guidelines for the establishment and/or amendment
of a PD overlay district in Section 30 -33.
Property Location and Type:
The approximate 6.3 acre property is the former home to the 60,000 square foot Copps Grocery
Store located at 1200 South Koeller Street, which has been removed from the site as well as the
1,750 square foot Sonic Drive -In Restaurant at 1180 South Koeller Street, which is now vacant
and proposed to be removed from the site. The property is located approximately 1,000 feet south
of West 9` Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Menard Drive. There is a 20 foot
stormwater and sanitary sewer easement along the eastern property line as well as a 75 foot ANR
pipeline easement cutting diagonally at the southwest corner of the property. Staples, Hobby
Lobby, Starbucks and other retail establishments are adjacent to the north and Shopko is adjacent
to the south. Highway 41 to the west and residential uses exist to the east.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use
F2onin
General Commercial - Vacant
i C -2 PD
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing
Uses''
10 Year Land Use Recommendation
Zonin
North
General Commercial
C -2
._.._._._ ..... .. .........................
South General
_......................._...._........_.._._.................._................._...._.__.._._._................................................._... ............................_._
Commer
.._._.............._._._..........._..................................._._......._.............._..........._
._.............................
... _............. .............................. _._ ........................ ....
.
. .....................
.......
.
_
. .............
West
..... . ................_.............................._ . _ . ..._ . _......._.................._._......... .............._....._
STH "41"
.......... _........_._.........._ ... ......................._._
. _ ........ .............................. ........ ..
N/A
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation
Land Use
10 Year Land Use Recommendation
Commercial
20 Year Land Use Recommendation
Commercial
ANAL NSIS
Use
This request involves the redevelopment of the commercial property creating three freestanding
buildings: 1) restaurant; 2) freestanding retail building; and 3) a three -unit commercial
retail /restaurant strip center. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
are compatible with surrounding commercial uses in the area. The improvement is also
advantageous as it will help to establish a presence close to the South Koeller Street right -of -way
and "shield" the majority of the parking lot from the roadway and highway. Restaurant and retail
uses are appropriate for this area and are not only compatible and complimentary with long range
land -use plans but are a fitting addition to the longstanding highway commercial corridor.
Site Design
The applicant proposes to place a freestanding 7,537 square foot restaurant at the northwest corner
of the property, a freestanding 4,500 square foot retail building at the southwest corner of the
property and a 38,625 square foot three- tenant commercial strip center in the center of the parcel.
The primary parking area is located on the western half of the property and a secondary
"employee" parking area is proposed on the eastern portion of the lot behind the commercial strip
center. The site development plan also includes pedestrian walks, a stormwater retention facility,
dumpster enclosure and development signage. The petitioner has included landscaped islands
throughout the development plan's parking facilities, which is important to meet parking code
requirements, to better define drive aisles, break up the pavement mass, and provide areas for
landscaping.
As depicted, the development plan requires several base standard modifications to the dimensional
regulations of the Zoning Ordinance.
(a) Front Yard Setback: The site plan depicts a row of parking setback between 0 -8 feet and
two signs setback between 10 -14 feet from South Koeller Street right -of -way whereas the
code requires a 25 foot front yard setback. The petitioner states that these base standard
modifications for the parking and signs are necessary to meet requirements placed upon
them by the restaurant including the necessity to have parking on all sides of the building.
Furthermore, they state that the reduced setbacks are needed to retain a consistent setback
and good site lines with the development on the property to the north and that the
development ability of this site would be at a disadvantage if the setbacks were strictly
enforced. Staff understands the desire for parking along all sides of the structure but would
point out that if the front row of parking stalls were removed, the parking requirements of
the code would still be met, automobile circulation would continue to function as designed
and a landscaped setback could be established along Koeller Street. Signage location is
more problematic as there is limited area to place them outside the setback and visibility
would be affected due to established setbacks of structures to the north.
(b) Front Yard Setback (building): The freestanding retail building is setback 8 feet from
South Koeller Street right -of -way and code requires a 50 foot front yard building setback.
Justification by the applicant for this base standard modification includes the need for the
tenant to have a presence along the Highway and frontage road, which cannot be attained
because of limitations due to the location of the 75 foot ANR pipeline easement. Staff
supports this base standard modification due to the fact the ANR pipeline severely restricts
placement of buildings at the frontage of the site. Additionally, staff believes the
placement of structures at the front of the property help to "shield" the larger parking lot
and provides a presence near the right -of -way.
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD
(c) Rear Transitional Yard Setback: The eastern property line setback is substandard for a row
of parking stalls and the dumpster enclosure as the stalls are proposed to be 9 feet 4 inches
from the lot line and the dumpster enclosure is 20 feet from the property line where the
code requires a 25 foot transitional yard setback because of the adjacency to the residential
uses along Moreland Street. Staff does not support this base standard modification as the
transitional yard setback requirements are in place to protect the residential uses from
noise, odor, lights and other elements associated with commercial uses. Also, the removal
of the eastern row of parking would not reduce parking count below code requirements.
(d) Side Yard Setback: The north side yard setback is proposed to be 0 feet where code
requires a 15 foot setback. This base standard modification is important because a shared
drive lane exists between the property to the north and the subject property. Staff supports
the north side yard setback as the area functions as a continuous and shared drive aisle
between the two developments.
Access /Parkin
Access to the development area is proposed to be provided by two full access drives from South
Koeller Street as well as through full cross access from the property to the north and single lane
cross access from the property to the south. An access control variance will be necessary for the
establishment of two drives as the Access Control Ordinance limits sites with less than 600 feet of
frontage to a single curb -cut and this property has approximately 480 feet of frontage.
Additionally, an access control variance is necessary to reduce the required lateral clearance of the
internal drive aisle from the street curb to 45 feet from the required 75 feet. All other dimensional
regulations of the stall and drive aisles are met in the proposed plan as are the number and
placement of landscaped islands.
Pedestrian connections to South Koeller Street are provided in the form of formal walks; one along
the south property line and another at the center of the site with each structure connecting to these
walks. Staff recommends that a walk directly from the freestanding retail structure should be
included in the site design as pedestrians would be required to circle the structure to get to the
entrance. A correction should also be made to the pedestrian network eliminating a portion of the
pedestrian walk that connects to the neighboring two - family residential property to the east.
Proposed parking includes a total of 384 parking stalls, of which 15 are handicapped stalls. 317 of
the stalls are located in the primary parking lot with an additional 67 stalls situated to the east of
the commercial strip center building. The proposed number of stalls meets the Zoning
Ordinance's minimum requirement of 291 and does not exceed the maximum requirement of 617.
If the 24 stalls located within the front yard setback and the 14 stalls within the rear transitional
yard setback are removed, the development would provide a total of 346 stalls, still within the
Zoning Ordinances requirement range.
Lighting
The submittal does not include a lighting /photometric plan but all lighting on the site will be
required to meet code standards.
Sim
Ground mounted signage for the development is proposed in the form of 1,578 square feet of sign
area on two pylon signs located along the South Koeller Street frontage. The first sign is to be
located approximately 10 feet from the property line next to the northern entrance and is proposed
Item — 1200SKoe11er- Rest &Com PD
to be a 40 foot tall, 188 square feet (376 square feet both sides) dedicated for the restaurant use. It
has internally lit letters as well as external light elements. The second sign is located at the
southern entrance approximately 14 feet from the property line and is proposed to be a 60 foot tall
five - tenant sign totaling 601 square feet (1202 square feet both sides). It is proposed to be
internally illuminated and have 10 foot high brick wrap on the base as well as ornamental features
on the columns and top. Maximum height for signage in the Highway 41 Corridor Overlay is 60
feet and total ground signage area allowed on the site is 1,600 square feet. Both height and sign
area are under the maximum limit of the code.
Building wall mounted signage is proposed for both the freestanding restaurant structure and the
freestanding retail structure but is not included for the multi -tenant commercial strip center. Per
the Zoning Code, wall signage is allowed up to a maximum of thirty percent (30 %) of any wall
area (per fagade). All proposed wall signage appears to meet code requirements and any future
wall signage on the multi- tenant commercial strip center will also be required to meet those
standards.
Landscaping
Landscaping is depicted on the site plan consisting of trees and shrubs along the perimeter and tree
plantings inside the landscaped islands. Staff is encouraged by the landscaping proposed by the
applicant and believes the landscaping will greatly help to beautify the site and break up the
parking area, especially from the South Koeller Street /Highway 41 perspective. As listed on the
site plan, plant quantities appear to be deficient of code requirements and the ability to add
additional landscaping appears to be constrained based on limited open space on the property.
Additional landscaping can be installed within increased front and rear transitional yard setbacks,
if provided, but staff is uncertain if code requirements could be met even then and therefore
recommends a base standard modification to reduce the required landscaping, as approved by the
Department of Community Development.
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management is not required to be installed at this location because the current site is
95% impervious and the redevelopment will actually decrease the impervious area with the
inclusion of landscaped islands and slightly increased setbacks. However, the applicant has
provided an approximately 10,000 square feet retention area at the southeast corner of the lot to
better control runoff on the property and improve stormwater conditions of the general area.
Besides the depiction of the retention area, no formal stormwater management, grading and
erosion control plans have been submitted but will be required to be approved by the Department
of Public Works during the site plan review /building permit process.
Buildings
Building elevations for the proposed freestanding restaurant and freestanding retail center are
included within the submittal. The freestanding restaurant has an overall height of approximately
20 feet. The exterior of the building is proposed to be stone veneer with brick headers over the
windows and doors. Additional architectural features include stained wood trellises and tiled roof.
All facades are broken up with the use of gables and front tower element. The freestanding retail
structure is proposed to be a flat roofed structure with an overall height of 24 feet. It is proposed
to have a fagade of brick veneer and exterior insulated finish system (EFIS). The mass of the
fagade is proposed to be broken up through the use of a masonry knee wall and masonry piers, as
well as extensive storefront windows and limited wall sconce lighting.
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD
Both proposed structures meet the architectural standards of the Zoning Ordinance and staff
believes the building designs of either structure are appropriate for the area and designed using
quality materials. The multi -tenant commercial strip center structure is not depicted with building
elevations so staff is recommending a condition to have final approval of building elevations for
the strip center. Additionally, staff is also recommending approval of a master wall sign plan for
the strip center to ensure uniformity of signage placed on that building.
RECOMMENDATION /CONDITION S
Staff believes that the proposed development, with conditions, will meet the standards as set forth
in Section 30 -33: Planned Developments and not have a negative impact on surrounding lands,
will be harmonious with the intended character of the general vicinity, and will not be detrimental
to neighboring property or the community as a whole.
Staff recommends approval of the development plan as proposed with the following conditions:
1) Base standard modification to setbacks:
(a) Reduced front yard setback for parking from 25 feet to 0 -8 feet.
(b) Reduced front yard setback for signage from 25 feet to 10 -14 feet.
(c) Reduced front yard setback for building from 50 feet to 8 foot.
(d) Reduced rear transitional yard setback for parking from 25 feet to 9 feet 4 inches.
(e) Reduced rear transitional yard setback for dumpsters from 25 feet to 20 feet.
(f) Reduce the north side yard setback for paving from 15 feet to 0 feet.
2) Approve access control variances:
(a) Permit two driveway accesses to the property.
(b) Reduce the lateral clearance requirement from 75 feet to 45 feet.
3) Establish a walk directly from the freestanding retail structure entrance to the public
sidewalk and remove the pedestrian walk connection to the property to the east.
4) Provide proof of cross - access agreements between the subject property and the properties
adjacent to the north and the south.
5) Base standard modification to reduce the required landscaping, as approved by the
Department of Community Development.
6) Stormwater management, grading and erosion control plans be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works.
7) Final approval of building elevations for the strip center structure.
8) Approval of a master wall sign plan for strip center with the intent that signage styles be
uniform on the structure.
The Plan Commission approved of the development plan as requested with revised conditions.
The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Mr. Buck presented the item and reviewed the site, surrounding area, zoning in said area, and the
proposed site plan. He stated that the development was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and discussed details of the proposal such as parking, pedestrian walks, stormwater detention,
signage, access drives, and the base standard modifications being requested. He discussed the
option of removing some of the parking stalls to meet code requirements without having to have a
base standard modification granted. Lighting plans have not yet been submitted for this
development and building elevations were reviewed. No design for the strip center has been
submitted at this time and landscape plans were reviewed which appear to be deficit from code
requirements. Conditions recommended for this request was also reviewed.
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD
Mr. Borsuk questioned why staff was not recommending the removal of the parking from both the
front and back of the development rather than allowing the base standard modification. He also
felt that a stormwater analysis should be addressed.
Mr. Buck responded that staff was not supportive of the reduced rear transitional yard setback
adjacent to the residential properties although the setbacks on the frontage road are consistent with
other existing buildings in the area therefore that setback would not be detrimental. All the
requested setbacks were included to allow the Plan Commission to recommend what they felt was
appropriate for the development.
Mr. Burich added that the ANR pipeline that extends through this site also dictates the placement
of buildings that can be located in the front portion of the parcel.
Mr. Cummings questioned what the width of the proposed landscaping was on Koeller Street.
Mr. Buck replied that the proposed landscaping was eight feet wide next to the retail building and
reduced down to zero to the north.
Mr. Cummings commented that the Vision Study recently completed indicated that citizens
desired to see more landscaping in the community.
Mr. Burich responded that the Commission could require additional landscaping on the site if they
felt it was appropriate. Considering the current condition of the site and the landscaping proposed
for the new development, staff felt the slightly reduced plans were an adequate trade -off.
Ms. Propp inquired if condition #1 A and 1 D for reduced setbacks for parking were both removed,
if landscaping could be added in these areas instead.
Mr. Buck responded affirmatively.
Mr. Thorns questioned if the buildings could be moved back if the front row of parking was
removed.
Andy Dumke, 2030 Menominee Drive, the developer for this request, replied that the Olive
Garden has national development standards for their establishments that require parking all around
the structure and to move the building back further would place it behind other buildings on
Koeller Street.
Mr. Thorns then questioned what style was planned for the strip center structure as renderings were
not submitted at this time and if this would have to come back to the Plan Commission in the
future for approval of the final plans for this portion of the development.
Mr. Bunch replied that the conditions address this issue as building elevations and a master wall
sign plan would both require approval prior to construction and would have to be consistent with
the rest of the development and meet the Highway 41 corridor overlay standards. If plans were
revised to not meet approval, it would have to come back through the process for approval of an
amendment by Plan Commission and Common Council.
Item — 1200SKoe11er- Rest &Com PD
Mr. Dumke commented that the two portions of the development on Koeller Street were ready to
proceed now but the strip center is not rented at this time so building elevations and signage was
not available to be submitted.
Ms. Propp asked to clarify that the developer would have an issue with the removal of condition
# 1 A to allow a reduced front yard setback for parking but would not have a problem with the
removal of condition #I D to allow a reduced rear transitional yard setback for parking.
Mr. Dumke responded that the Olive Garden would object to the removal of the front row of
parking and national chain developments are in high demand and the restaurant will locate
elsewhere if plans are not satisfactory.
Mr. Cummings stated that it appeared that the City has standards however there are exceptions to
said standards.
Mr. Dumke replied that neighboring properties are already established within the setback areas
along Koeller Street.
Mr. Vajgrt commented that there is currently very little landscaping on Koeller Street and the City
could lose a good development by requiring landscaping and the loss of parking on the front of the
site.
Mr. Dumke stated that the redevelopment of a site is often more difficult than developing vacant
land as you have to deal with the pre- existing conditions and area of the site.
Mr. Burich questioned if it would be agreeable to add a few landscape features in the front with
only the loss of a few parking stalls.
Mr. Dumke felt that would be acceptable.
Marge Bolding, 1138 Evans Street, stated that the detention pond on the site plan is not in the same
location as it was on the site plan that was mailed out with the meeting notice.
Mr. Buck responded that the public notices were sent out with the original site plan and the site
plan was revised at the last minute with the pond being relocated to a different area.
Ms. Bolding inquired if the detention pond would have fencing surrounding it.
Mr. Buck replied that typically they are not fenced in but a safety shelf is on the edge which is
shallower and it gradually gets deeper.
Mr. Borsuk stated that he was concerned with stormwater issues not being addressed as this is a
large site with existing flooding issues in the area.
Mr. Gohde discussed the requirements for quantity and quality of stormwater management and
pollution control requirements regarding impervious surfaces and the separate entities that deal
with these issues. He stated that he discussed the situation with Mr. Dumke and agreed on a
reasonable compromise.
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD 7
There was brief discussion on the redevelopment of previously occupied sites and how the City
regulates stormwater requirements of said sites compared to new developments.
Mr. Thorns questioned why the same condition was not included for this site as the previous
request regarding the detention basin design.
Mr. Buck responded that it was not included as the detention basin would be screened completely
by landscaping. It could be added if the Commission felt it was necessary.
Mr. Borsuk commented that as far as the parking in front of the Olive Garden on Koeller Street, it
does not matter what is to the north or south of it as the Vision Study reflected that citizens desire
to have more landscaping in their community. At the time of the redevelopment of a site, these
issues should be addressed and the parking stalls should be eliminated in front of the structure and
replaced with landscaping. He also commented that he was frustrated with the way the City
handles stormwater issues as he felt both the release and cleanliness should be addressed
regardless of whether it is a newly developed site or a redevelopment. He would like to remove
the parking both in front of the proposed restaurant and in the rear of the development.
Mr. Thorns stated that he shared Mr. Borsuk's concerns with the stormwater issues but felt it was
adequate of the developer was willing to address the issue by including the detention basin on the
site. He felt that if the parking was to be removed in front of the restaurant due to setback
requirements, the other retail building should be removed as well. As proposed, the development
is even with existing site lines and the removal of the parking stalls in front of the restaurant will
prevent the development from proceeding and he felt it fit into the site appropriately.
Mr. Vajgrt questioned if the Commission members desired to add the condition related to the
detention basin design with native plants as discussed previously.
Board members unanimously decided to add condition #9 for the natural design of the detention
basin
Motion by Thoms to approve the development plan for the development of a restaurant,
commercial building and commercial strip center at 1200 South Koeller Street as
requested with the following conditions which includes the removal of the condition related
to the reduced rear transitional yard setbackfor parking:
1) Base standard modification to setbacks:
(a) Reduced front yard setback for parking from 25 feet to 0 -8 feet.
(b) Reduced front yard setback for signage from 25 feet to 10 -14 feet.
(c) Reduced front yard setback for building from 50 feet to 8 foot.
(d) Reduced rear transitional yard setback for dumpsters from 25 feet to 20 feet.
(e) Reduce the north side yard setback for paving from 15 feet to 0 feet.
2) Approve access control variances:
(f) Permit two driveway accesses to the property.
(g) Reduce the lateral clearance requirement from 75 feet to 45 feet.
3) Establish a walk directly from the freestanding retail structure entrance to the public
sidewalk and remove the pedestrian walk connection to the property to the east.
4) Provide proof of cross - access agreements between the subject property and the properties
adjacent to the north and the south.
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD
S) Base standard modification to reduce the required landscaping, as approved by the
Department of Community Development.
6) Stormwater management, grading and erosion control plans be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works.
7) Final approval of building elevations for the strip center structure.
8) Approval of a master wall sign plan for strip center with the intent that signage styles be
uniform on the structure.
9) Detention basin is designed without riprap above the water line and native plants be
planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety shelf.
Seconded by Nollenberger.
Motion by Borsuk to amend the conditions to remove condition 41A allowing a reduced
front yard setback for parking.
Seconded by Thoms.
Ms. Propp commented that we need to encourage redevelopment of this site and will support the
original motion but would not support the amendment.
Mr. Nollenberger and Mr. Thorns agreed.
Mr. Cummings stated that a decision was being made for the positioning of the Olive Garden
structure in relation to the positioning of the Starbuck's location and he did not feel it was wise to
make such a decision as what is there right now may not continue to exist in the future.
Mr. Vajgrt commented that Starbuck's was not the only site as there were other structures
positioned in the same location on Koeller Street.
Motion on the amendment denied 3 -6 (Ayes- Borsuk/Cummings /McHugh. Nays -
Thoms/Fojtikl
Hinz/Propp /Vajgrt/Nollenberger)
Motion carried 7 -2. ( Ayes- Thoms/Fojtik/ Hinz / Propp /McHugh/Vajgrt/Nollenberger. Nays -
BorsuklCummings.)
Item — 1200SKoeller- Rest &Com PD
Cif of Oshkosh Ap SUBM To:
` y pp Dept. of Community Development
Planned Development Review 215 Church Ave_, P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130
OfHKOIH ❑ Conditional Use Permit Review PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
ON THE WATER
* *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK **
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: 1b�? (f �1` G �) L�t.� Date:
Petitioner's Address: J l J)G S City: ,� �� State: t�, } � Zip: e t
Telephone #: ( � �� Fax: 61P) L .� Contact # or Email: LV-W .l.e 0CV-,"r1 t 188 I ML30t
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): Owner Representative Tenant . Prospective Buyer CUB ,
Petitioner's Signature (required); A 0_UA0_ a . _ ---Date:
OWNER INFO , i ,r� r� � � 1
Owner(s): LPL. t l"C -%tY�► � y ` A V .l U H Date: E
Owner(s) Address: e X2 � l I _ -�� City: �_ State: f Zip: C
Telephone #: Fax: Q20) + tL j,4-' Other Contact # or Email: F 1 �` 1 c"_ m_Lixf k_ �"
Ownership Status (Please Check): !individual "_ Ttust r . Partnership 'Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the
property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative
and may be postponed by the Planing S ices Di for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: ( = = — Date: �{
SITE INFORMATION
Address /Location of Proposed Project: I VW 'J, t�C.-�'� — LO-V - ! L Parcel No. I K9 6 Sl
Proposed Project Type: V Vfit/C' VVA4UW TZ� f'���
L V �� 1 11� 0t— lam-
Current Use of Property; Zotting: `- 1
Land Uses Surrounding Site: North:
South:
East:
West:
"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request.
Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at www.ei.oshkosi). Community _, Development /Platunitig.htni
Staff `y & Date Recd
vP_J I
Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use /development plan will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
I . Health, safety, and general Welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
N to tA T vet CCU
2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety.
� MCC CC i l�co4e.�c��C'�— PC-V��i�J
3. Noise air water, or other forms of environmental pollution.
11�t N eel �f4
4. The demand for and availabilit of p ublic services and facilities. t. t�)Cjet 171,J61
I ITC 5. Character and future development of the area. `� E L 8 �� L!
SZ9 �
RD
t-L V-e mA'T6 Lr>
A NARRATIVE of the proposed conditional use0evelopment Plan including:
❑ Existing and proposed use of the property
❑ Identification of all structures (including paving, signage, etc.) on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
❑ Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers
❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the
nearest one - hundredth of an acre
• Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fumes, vibration, etc,
• Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area.
❑ Traffic generation (anticipated number of customers, deliveries, employee shift changes, etc.)
❑ Any other pertinent information to properly understand the intended use /plan and its relation to nearby properties and the
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
community as a whole
A complete SITE PLAN and BUILDING ELEVATIONS must include:
❑ Two (2) full size (minimum 24" x 36") scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations
❑ Two (2) 8 %" x 11 (minimum) to 11" x 17" (maximum) reduction of the site plan acid building elevations
❑ One compact disc or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the project in AutoCAD 2000 format with fonts and plot style
table file (if plans have been prepared digitally)
❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner and contact information of petitioner's
engineerstsurveyorslarcltitecis, or other design professionals used in the preparation of the plans
❑ The date of the original plan and revision dates, if applicable
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale.
• All property lines and existing and proposed right -of -way lines with dimensions clearly labeled
• All required setback and offset lines
❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives, signs, decks, patios,
fences, walls, etc.
• Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for screening
• Location and dimension of all on -site parking (and off -site parking provisions if they are to be employed), including a summary
of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30 -36 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance
❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas
❑ Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a photometrics plan
❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e.
visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to: HVAC
equipment, electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators, etc.
91
Orl9- EYf -0L5 3N0Hd NISNOOSIM'HSOHHSO
- -_ - rle rs NISNOD6IM H013lddY 13MUSa31130N
ۥ O H1n DS 05
133tl1S U301H01
o f 1N3WdOl3A9C13ONV111V N m5x� N w g .1
:UOd 03SOdMid
a e .ens a„
i
'
Q3bs eb o4 F `4 ^€ ° g MEE 3�0
g zs.s „e RIM s s# c o=€ 5Y Leo o o; pp Y K
=G ^ U zo` v en a e 2
or=
3;00 _ 5g r$.
..E? �_<E� _ �o�J a Ff�` `2i2 �` o'y S �r 2
s o'er. ^ -° '000 °i'�' �D ":�poo
$ _ n^@c r6$ ^OUO =oos" GG � •=,9Li'b " ..
o <8 ��^ 3�, " on ".4 �D
a u $:fE t" 4'�C" tx 5: "°���dt
On
gxsl gall Ke�o oho ogHoo��g<
J�
�= w
U"
Cd >
�c Z
w
O
J >
w
O
i
d Z
Z
a.
3
z
-
' o
w' o
!% o 0
N
ry
=
0 1 0 �nro
«
�o
7
6 6
-
=
==_
u
N
�
�
5axa
c3
0�
J�
�= w
U"
Cd >
�c Z
w
O
J >
w
O
i
d Z
Z
a.
3
z
-
' o
w' o
!% o 0
N
•*
0> l 9- L Y o- 0 Z 6 � 3 N 0 H d
'�• €�
016 b6 N16N0061M 'N013IddY
133616 630IH0 H11106 0601
133atS a31130>1 OOZL
Z06179 NISNOOSIM'HSONHSO
s
133atS a31130>1 OOZL
m
zr
nmRa� Sn 1N3WdOl3A3a 3ONVIlIV
II
_-
__
II
II
II
y
E�
6±
ndOd 1N3WdOl3A3Q 03SOdOMd
Er
E
II
II
Eo
6 1
--n
II
II
II
II
II
II
Iz
I �
Wa
J
C) <
U x
II I
II
II
II
--u
$
SY
e
--n
H
II
--H
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II z
II O
II < y I
116:
II �
II -
II -
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
— J
EZ.
En
0
s
a
II
_-
__
II
II
II
y
E�
6±
II
II
Er
E
II
II
Eo
6 1
--n
II
II
II
II
II
II
Iz
I �
Wa
J
C) <
U x
II I
II
II
II
--u
$
SY
e
--n
H
II
--H
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II z
II O
II < y I
116:
II �
II -
II -
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
— J
EZ.
En
0
w
Eb
�N
TI
ri
Q
�c
r
Q
Z�
C C
J c
a
W u
F
d z
s
II
_-
__
II
II
II
-
--
II
II
-
-
II
II
I0
a y
w
C3
_
-'
-
II
II
II
�:
-
II
w
Eb
�N
TI
ri
Q
�c
r
Q
Z�
C C
J c
a
W u
F
d z
'OT!'ubisao V u6!S Ae8 usaig of Aiale!pawwi ajgeAed si legl pabjego a pim>uomlie SnA jol aal e
'Asoo $ u6!S AEG uaaig wool uo!ssimiad lno4l!mj0 gl!mJap!OH Aq pasn aq 4jogje sup to uopiod Aue p!neLp Imp spuelsJapun Jap!OH •lsonbai uodn oil'u6isap 8 ufi!s Ae8 uaajg of Aple!p
l! Lunlal of pue'Aljed p!LA Aue a! Njomlje s!Lp aso!os!p o] lou saailie JapioH OU OT!'u6!sao R u6iS Ae8 uaajg to uo!ssimad ualpm aql inoLpim )pomlje s!tp aonpoidai jo'alnquls!p'a
'JaAe of IN sa3J6e JapIoH aql loaraq ldpoaj sl! AS - OTl'u6!sap v u0!S APB uaaig of Amlaudwd aje pue Apiqua sll u! palg6uAdoo aye paup'lu03 uopeLmolu! 3L9 p Lie 'L!IDmgIe aLA'luawnoo
£OL6UVOU Xtld•£6LS'Zlb'OZ6 W•£L£t5 WN13 NMOoLL EI S'Iia GNVIHRNOtld'SEOBL
LV95'BZC " ..0•.L =. &L '" LL•BZ•L
N J 1 S3 C1 NE) 1 S wi VA mow+ —µ= 1s 83T130)1 'S
mw 1NMNZ / 30 37NVL1lV
9 N 3
CN
= j N
/n LO O Z
V !V W
� I
(]
V;tL'
z
Z
C
z
Z
9 9 -d
0
T
z
Z
w
w
LL
W
c
O
0
6 - 6 L
0 - .0 L
10
iT) CO
�I I
niiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiin n
0
RE
m
\ U
w
Q
U
D
Z
I
Y
U
Q
m
w
N
F=
O
o�
a!
N
u-
11
LL
U)
O
m
LL
co
LL
LL
N
CO
U)
Q
0
O
U)
o
d
v
c
m
C
m
C
m
C
U
U
U
o
-
-
a
a
o_
v
N
X
X
X
(D
In
n
CJ
C
lid
o
o
e
e
�I I
niiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiin n
0
RE
m
\ U
w
Q
U
D
Z
I
Y
U
Q
m
w
N
F=
O
o�
a!
N
u-
11
00 ❑
O m ^ �
C C
L Y
O 0
L t
LL 0-
0
o
O
m
w
Z d
L
ti u
m Y
U N
•L C
U �
f0 ._
N H
C �
0 s
m u
0 3
ru p
� Y
m y
C
O1 m
ru CL)
3
3: F
Y
C
m
d
.
W
0
!Z
Q
m
a
0
m
a�
D
I
U
a
0
a
n
`m>
c �
o . m
N `
N d
a �
E E
m m
0
0
N
w
m
IA Ql
V/ N
/ o
li CI LL m
W
J
Z 3�
a_
m �
J � 3
a
a , o
10 ¢
EN
as
�Lr)
m m
C m
0
U-
L) d m _
C
� II
c
. [h
co N
L �
�/1 9
m.
0
co �
m
�I
_I
.j
uJ
12
c a
O m N
4+ N
C C
Q1 �' •" m
O � �
W y
S
a
O
O
M
W
Z
s
y U
Y
N
U m
U c
A .�
N �
c
o
L
N U
0 3
m p
d �
C t0
rn�
y
6S N
Y
C9
rn
d
.
s
1
O
O.
a
Q
N
a
0
7
0
a�
m
v
0
a
m
m
m>
C �
O d
N �
m o
a
c
m
F E
S �
m m
_
v. �Z
a
W
c LO
Z
a
_m
D
�
_
lL
J
�
J
m
3�
�
J ;
Q. o
m Q
C _
E �n
�a
_. (D
m
m
c o�
�
� o
a ii
� d
C m
c II
V 11 co
N m
Lo 'DD Z) cD
m,
o
m
C D 1
d i
=i
U
Lo
13
r— ❑
E2 -- --
cu c
9 a�
O m
W U)
Ln
0
CD 0
d
n
U
m:
�i
c M7Y9135 7NalIfIB ,aS i
I
1S a3113ON 'S ]� US 3dA5 W ,SL
0
0
M
W
Z m
u
y u
ro
r y
u N
I
t C
U .�
W N
C �
0 y
� L
m u
0 3
m o
m "
c
rn�
m m
L
m
0
m
v
6
0
a
a
Q
a
0
m
q
a
C
A
m �
U `
`m
o m
d �
� O
E E
� �i
v• Z
a
o�
a
W
7
m
m
a
O
J
�
m
a
m v
�
� 3
v
m o
i Q
�, co
m c
rn
O
lL
a) m
n
U � m
v�
LL- m
L = m
( D
14
C
0
a�
W
2
m
CO
� m
0
0
t
c
O
d
0 .0
_
N co
C W `
N f6
o E
� Q
O
N
N .L
J U
3 Co
0 0
N c
o
L Y
C N
O a
N
is N
N N
W a
'o
a
m
n
m
U �
d N
i
N �
o m
m d
ti d
� O
C C
E E
m m
m
° I
m
�I
d
YI
o m
a
LL
� o �
CO
CD Ln
0
N
..
a�
3
0
m
m
3
c
v
`m
m
O
v .
o=
Na
' O
L 10
N Y
a�
o LL
ro N
>o
m
0 o
d
m
>
0
a
o_
a
D-
o
m
v
0
co
m
'a
0
N
u'
16
KLEINHUIZEN REV TRUST
PD- RESTAURANT /RETAIL DEV 1028 N 14TH ST SHEBOYGAN LLC GERRITT J /DONNA
1200 S KOELLER ST 230 OHIO ST 200 1115 E NEW YORK AVE
PC: 07 -05 -11 OSHKOSH WI 54902 5825
OSHKOSH WI 54901 4030
KOELLER ONE LLC
1818 W BELTLINE HWY
MADISON WI 53713 2334
JBC DEVELOPMENT LLC
1138 EVANS ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901 3969
GAMS LLC
4932 9TH ST RD
OSHKOSH WI 54904 6530
TLK INVESTMENTS LLC
1754 RIVER MILL RD
OSHKOSH WI 54901 2769
1200 SOUTH LLC
3315 N BALLARD RD STE A
APPLETON WI 54911 8988
SHOPKO SPE REAL ESTATE LLC
PO BOX 19060
GREEN BAY WI 54307 9060
SONIC OF OSHKOSH LLC
230 OHIO ST 200
OSHKOSH WI 54902 5825
RMA ARCHITECTS INC
ATTN LAURA KROLL
1050 S GRIDER ST
APPLETON WI 54914
ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT
ATTN ANDY DUMKE
230 OHIO ST 200
OSHKOSH WI 54902
17
DISCLAIMER
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it is not intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and it is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepencies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
RESTAURANT /RETAIL
DEVELOPMENT
1200 S KOELLER ST
Scale: 1" = 150'
N O.IHKOlH
ON THE WATER
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
06/21/11
18
MININPI
hat
NMI ..
IL:11 I[ s.r WM
w ti
m� s
0
its
1 01
J. ' I ' mmm
lo
J
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it is not intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and it is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepencies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
DEVELOPMENT
1200 S KOELLER ST
Scale: 1" = 150'
N O.IHKOfH
ox me wnr�
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
Created by - dff 06/2111
20
DISCLAIMER RESTAURANT /RETAIL O