HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-246JUNE 14, 2011
11 -246 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7 -0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE AND SUBMIT WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES 2010 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE
ANNUAL REPORT / WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the 2010
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report, having been reviewed, is approved, and the
proper City officials are authorized and directed to submit the Report to the Department
of Natural Resources.
( 0
OJHKO H
ON THE WATER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Stephan M. Brand, Utilities Superintendent
DATE: June 8, 2011
RE: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2010 Compliance Maintenance Annual
Report City of Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant
BACKGROUND
The City of Oshkosh is required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources as part of the
Wisconsin Pollution Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) Permit to complete a Compliance
Maintenance Annual Report. This report outlines the performance of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and
sanitary sewer collection system for the previous year. This report needs to be formally approved by the
Common Council and submitted to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources by June 30, 2011.
ANALYSIS
The report is broken down into sections that address specific areas of performance for the wastewater
system. Based on the responses in each section a score is determined and a letter grade is given based
on the score. This grade is used by the Department of Natural Resources to determine the need for
improvements to the wastewater treatment system. A letter grade of an A or B does not require any
action be taken based on the information provided. The following is a brief summary of each section.
Influent Flow and Loading This looks at plant flow capacity and treatment ability based on the design of
the facility. Our highest flow month for 2010 was July with a monthly average of 24.32 million gallons per
day which is 69.5 percent of the design flow of 35 million gallons per day. Our normal months are closer
to 33 percent of design flow or an average of 11.5 million gallons per day. The treatment capacity is
based on Biochemical Oxygen Demand in pounds per day. Our highest influent loading monthly average
was 15,911 pounds in the month of July. Our design loading is 33,336 Ibs which puts us at 47.7 percent
of our design loading for the facility. Based on the available capacity of the facility this section scored a
letter rag de A
Effluent Quality BOD, TSS, Ammonia, Phosphorus These four sections look at the quality of our
treatment for each of these parameters based on our permit requirements. There were no treatment
issues for any of these sections and each scored a letter grade A .
Biosolids Management Solids are generated from the treatment process due to the growth of the
microorganisms that are used for the treatment of wastewater. We have a separate process to treat this
material as it is removed and turn it into a product that can be beneficially reused as fertilizer on approved
agricultural land. This section of the report looks at the treatment process and management of the
biosolids in compliance with the permit requirements. All requirements were met and this section scored a
letter -grade A.
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influent Flow and Loading
flows and (C)BOD load
12. Waximum month design flow and desiqn (C)BOD loadinq.
Page 1 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influent Flow and Loadinq (Continued)
Number of times the flow and (C)BOD exceeded 90% or 100% of design, points earned, and score:
14.: : '.__ IWas the influent flow meter calibrated in the last year? __ I
• Yes Enter last calibration date, MM /DD /YYYY 9 -17 -2010
O No - explain
Use Ordinance
5.1 Did your community have a sewer use ordinance that limited or prohibited the discharge of excessive
conventional pollutants ((C)BOD, SS, or pH) or toxic substances to the sewer from industries, commercial
users, hauled waste, or residences?
• Yes
O No
If No, please describe:
Page 2 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Page 3 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance ((C)BOD)
nthlv averaoe effluent values, exceedances, and points for
12. any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance? I
13 : Was the effluent flow meter calibrated in the last year?
• Yes - enter last calibration date, MO /DAY/YEAR: 11 -22 -2010
O No - explain:
Page 4 of 31
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
12/6 = 2.0
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance ((C)BOD) (Continued)
Page 5 of 31
4.
W hat problems, if any, were experienced over the last year that threatened treatment?
5.
Other Monitoring and Limits
5.1 At any time in the past year was there an exceedance of a permit limit for any other pollutants suchas
metals, pH, residual chlorine, or fecal coliform?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, please describe:
5.2At any time in the past year was there an effluent acute or chronic whole effluent toxicity (WET) test?
• Yes
O No
If Yes, please describe:
1 st Quarter 2010 Acute and Chronic W.E.T. tests performed. Both Passed.
5.31f the biomonitoring (WET) test did not pass, were steps taken to identify and /or reduce source(s) of
toxicity?
O Yes
O No
• NA
Please explain unless not applicable:
Page 5 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Total Suspended Solids)
averaqe effluent values, exceedances, and points for TSS:
12 ' ;Ilf anv violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance? 1
Page 6 of 31
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
12/6 = 2.0
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Ammonia = NH3)
and weekly averaqe effluent values, exceedances, and points for NH3:
Note: Limit exceedances are considered for monthly OR weekly averages but not both.
When a monthly average limit exists it will be used to detect exceedances and
generate points. This will be true even if a weekly limit also exists. When a weekly
average limit exists and a monthly limit does not exist, the weekly limit will be used
to detect exceedances and generate points.
Page 7 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Ammonia = NH3) (Continued)
2. If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
Page 8 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Phosphorus)
averaqe effluent values, exceedances, an points for
[2 IIf anv violations occurred, what action was taken to regain co mpliance? I
Page 9 of 31
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
1216 = 2.0
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids
Quality and Management
Questions Points
1
Biosolids Use /Disposal:
1.1 How did you use or dispose of your biosolids ?(Check all that apply)
® Land Applied Under Your Permit
❑ Publicly Distributed Exceptional Quality Biosolids
❑ Hauled to Another Permitted Facility
❑ Landfilled
❑ Incinerated
❑ Other
NOTE: If you do not remove biosolids from your system annually, please describe your system typ
such as lagoons, reed beds, recirculating sand filters, etc, and if biosolids were land applied last
year, please also check top box above.
1.1.1 If you checked Other, Please describe:
2!.
Land Application Site:
Last Year's Approved and Active Land Application Sites
2. 1.1 How many acres did you have? 2.1.2 How many acres did you
use?
535 acres 420 acres
2.2 If you did not have enough acres for your land application needs, what action was taken?
2.3 Did you overapply nitrogen on any of your approved land application sites you used Iasi
0
year?
Yes(30 points)
• No
2.4 Have all the sites you used last year for land application been soil tested in the previous
0
4 years?
Yes
O No (10 points)
O N/A
3.
Biosolids Metals
Number of biosolids outfalls in your WPDES permit = 1
3.1 For each outfall tested, verify the biosolids metal quality values for your facility during the last
calendar year
BIOSOLIDS METALS CHARACTERISTICS
utfall:002 - Cake sludge
Page 10 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Qualitv and Management (Continued)
Parameter
80% of
H.Q.
Ceiling
mg /kg on a dry weight basis
1 -2
10 Points
O
> 2
Times Exceeded
Limit
Limit
Limit
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
High
Ceiling
Quality
arsenic
41
75
9
8
9
1640
6.2
11
9.8
i
0
0
cadmium
39
85
1.5
1.1
1.1
.83
1.4
1.5
0
0
copper
1500
4300
610
560
400
660
700
0
lead
300
840
31
26
35
25
42
37
0
0
mercury
17
57
.087
.14
.38
.38
.12
<.091
0
0
molybdenum 60
75
6.8
11
10
51
122
12
12
0
0
nickel
336
420
29
26
1 590
40
33
35
0
0
selenium
80
100
3.4
.53
5.8
3.4
<4.5
7.8
0
0
zinc
2800
7500
650
680
400
700
1
1660
0
0
3.1.1 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the high quality limits OR 80% of the limit for
1 0
molybdenum, nickel or selenium = 0
Exceedance Points
0
0
0 Points
O
1 -2
10 Points
O
> 2
15 Points
3.1.2 If you exceeded the high quality limits, did you cumulatively track the metals loadings at each 0
land application site? (check applicable box)
O Yes
O No (10 points)
• NA. Did not exceed limits or no HQ limit applies (0 points)
O NA. Did not land apply biosolids until limit was met(0 points)
3.1.3 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the ceiling limits = 0 0
Exceedance Points
0
0
0 Points
O
1
10 Points
O
> 1
15 Points
3.1.4 Were biosolids land applied which exceeded the ceiling limit? 0
Yes(20 points)
• No (0 points)
3.1.5 If any metal limit (high quality or ceiling ) was exceeded at any time, what action was taken?
Has the source of the metals been identified?
Page 11 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Rinsnlids Quality and Manaaement (Continued)
Page 12 of 31
4.
Pathogen Control(per outfall):
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates
01/01/2010 - 02/28/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
03/01/2010 - 04/30/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
05/01/2010 - 06/30/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Page 12 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
Outfall Number: 002
Biosolids Class: B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates: 07/01/2010 - 08/31/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process: ANAER
Process Description: HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
09/01/2010 - 10/31/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
11/01/2010 - 12/31/2010
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE
4.1 If exceeded Class B limit or did not meet the process criteria at the time of land
application(40 Points)
4.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time?
O Yes
Page 13 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Qualitv and Manaqement (Continued)
Number:
• No
If yes, what action was taken?
Method Date:
5
Vector Attraction Reduction(per outfall):0
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
02/03/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
72.2
Outfall
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
06/02/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
56.6
Number:
002
Method Date:
02/03/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
72.2
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
04/14/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
55.1
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
04/14/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
55.1
Page 14 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Qualitv and Management (Continued)
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
06/02/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
56.6
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
08/11/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
52
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
08/11/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
52
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
10/06/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
71.6
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
10/06/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
71.6
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
12/01/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
59.7
Page 15 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
12/01/2010
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
59.7
5.1 If the limit or criteria was exceeded at the time of land application, 40 point 0
5.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time?
Yes
• No
If yes, what action was taken?
Biosolids Storage:0
6.1 How many days of actual,current biosolids storage capacity did your wastewater treatment
I0
facilitv have either on -site or off -site?
•
>+ 180 days (0 points)
O
150 - 179 days (10 points)
O
120 - 149 days (20 points)
O
90 - 119 days (30 points)
O
< 90 days (40 points)
O
Not Applicable (0 points)
6.2 If you check Not Applicable above, explain why.
Issues:
7.1 Describe any outstanding biosolids issues with treatment, use or overall mgt?
Page 16 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants)
Questions
Points
1. Was your wastewater treatment plant adequately staffed last year?
• Yes
O No
If No, please describe:
Could use more help /staff for:
2. Did your wastewater staff have adequate time to properly operate and maintain the plant and fulfill
all wastewater management tasks including recordkeeping?
• Yes
O No. Explain
3. Did your plant have a documented AND implemented plan for preventative maintenance on major
0
equipment items?
• Yes (Continue with questions below)
O No (40 points and go to question 6)
If No, explain:
4.: , ' Did this preventative maintenance program depict frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, and
0
other tasks necessary for each piece of equipment?
• Yes
O No (10 points)
5. Were these preventative maintenance tasks, as well as major equipment repairs, recorded and
0
filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly?
• Yes
O (Paper file system)
O (Computer program)
• (Both Paper and Computer)
O No (10 points)
6. Did your plant have a detailed O &M Manual that was used as a reference when needed?
• Yes
O No
7. Rate the overall maintenance of your wastewater plant.
• Excellent
Page 17 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants) (Continued)
O Very Good
O Good
O Fair
O Poor
Describe your rating:
Facility staff are proactive with operations, maintenance, & equipment replacement.
Page 18 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Operator Certification and Education
Questions Points
1. Did you have a designated operator -in- charge during the report year? 0
0 Yes (0 point)
O No (20 points)
Name: KEVIN R SORGE
Certification No: 33081
2.. In accordance with Chapter NR 114.08 and 114.09, Wisconsin Administrative Code, what grade
and subclass(es) were required for the operator -in- charge to operate the wastewater treatment
plant and what grade and subclass(es) were held by the operator -in- charge?
Required: 4 - ACEFGIJ; A - PRIMARY SETTLING; C - ACTIVATED SLUDGE; E -
DISINFECTION; F - ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; G - MECHANICAL
SLUDGE; I - PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; J - LABORATORY
Held: 4 - ACEFGIJ; 4 - A= PRIMARY SETTLING GRADE 4; C= ACTIVATED
SLUDGE GRADE 4; E= DISINFECTION GRADE 4; F= ANAEROBIC
DIGESTION GRADE 4; G= MECHANICAL SLUDGE GRADE 4;
1= PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL GRADE 4; J= LABORATORY GRADE 4
3. Was the operator -in- charge certified at the appropriate level to operate this plant? 0
• Yes (0 point)
O No (20 points)
4. In the event of the loss of your designated operator -in- charge, did you have a contingency plan to 0
ensure the continued proper operation & maintenance of the plant that includes one or more of the
following options (check all that apply):
4.1 ® one or more additional certified operators on staff
4.2 ❑ an arrangement with another certified operator
4.3 ❑ an arrangement with another community with a certified operator
4.4 ❑ an operator on staff who has an operator -in- training certificate for your plant and
is expected be certified within one year
4.5 ❑ a consultant to serve as your certified operator
4.6 ❑ None of the above (20 points)
Explain: The Wastewater Superintendent, Utilities Superintendent, and two liquids
operators hold all of the necessary certifications.
Page 19 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Operator Certification and Education (Continued)
5
If you had a designated operator -in- charge, was the operator -in- charge earning continuing
education credits at the following rates?
Grades T, 1, and 2:
• Averaging 6 or more CEUs per year
O Averaging less than 6 CEUs per year
Grades 3 and 4:
0 Averaging 8 or more CEUs per year
O Averaging less than 8 CEUs per year
Not applicable:
O See Question 1.
Page 20 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Financial Management
Questions
Points
Person Providing This Financial Information
Name: Jeremy Maurer
Telephone: (920) 232 -5321
E -Mail Address(optional):
2. Are User Charge or other Revenues sufficient to cover O &M Expenses for your wastewater
0
treatment plant AND /OR collection system ?
• Yes (0 points)
O No (40 points)
If No, please explain:
3_ When was the User Charge System or other revenue source(s) last reviewed and /or revised?
0
Year: 2011
• 0 -2 years ago (0 points)
O 3 or more years ago (20 points)
O Not Applicable (Private Facility)
4. Did you have a special account (e.g., CWFP required segregated Replacement Fund, etc.) or
0
financial resources available for repairing or replacing equipment for your wastewater treatment
plant and /or collection system?
• Yes
O No (40 points)
REPLACEMENT FUNDS(PUBLIC MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SHALL COMPLETE QUESTION 5)
5 .' Equipment Replacement Funds
5.1 When was the Equipment Replacement Fund last reviewed and /or revised?
0
Year: 2011
• 1 -2 years ago (0 points)
O 3 or more years ago (20 points)
O Not Applicable Explain:
5.2 What amount is in your Replacement Fund?
Equipment Replacement Fund Activity
5.2.1 Ending Balance Reported on Last Year's CMAR: $2,685,979.19
5.2.2 Adjustments + $0.00
if necessary (e.g., earned interest, audit correction, withdrawal of
excess funds, increase making up previous shortfall, etc.)
5.2.3 Adjusted January 1st Beginning Balance $2,685,979.19
Page 21 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Financia Manageme (Continued)
5.2.4 Additions to Fund (e.g., portion of User Fee, earned interest, etc.) + $8,547.32
5.2.5 Subtractions from Fund (e.g., equipment replacement, major repairs - $819,968.95
- use description box 5.2.5.1 below".)
5.2.6 Ending Balance as of December 31st for CMAR Reporting Year $1,874,557.56
(All Sources: This ending balance should include all Equipment Replacement
Funds whether held in a bank account(s), certificate(s) of deposit, etc.)
.2.5.1. Indicate adjustments, equipment purchases and/or major repairs from 5.2.5 above
Oshkosh WWTP plant and lift station telemetry upgrade, Lift station electrical and
controls upgrade, Oshkosh WWTP HVAC upgrades, Oshkosh WWTP concrete and
clarifier repairs.
5.3 What amount should be in your replacement
fund? $1,705,580.08
(If you had a CWFP loan, this amount was originally based on the Financial Assistance Agreemen
(FAA) and should be regularly updated as needed. Further calculation instructions and an example
can be found by clicking the HELP option button.)
5.3.1 Is the Dec. 31 Ending Balance in your Replacement Fund above ( #5.2.6) equal to or greater
than the amount that should be in it( #5.3)?
• Yes
O No Explain:
Future Planning
6.1 During the next ten years, will you be involved in formal planning for upgrading, rehabilitating
or new construction of your treatment facility or collection system?
• Yes (If yes, please provide major project information, if not already listed below)
O No
Project Description
Estimated Cost
Approximate
Construction
Year
Additional Aeration Basin
$2,700,000.00
2017
2 Final Clarifiers
$2,600,000.00
2017
Digester draft tube mixers
$2,500,000.00
2016
Sanitatry Sewer Improvements CIP
$4,245,200.00
2011
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements based on previous years study CIP
$975,000.00
2011
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$4,682,700.00
2012
Inflow and Infiltration study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study CIP
$1,000,000.00
2012
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$3,918,800.00
2013
Page 22 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Financial Management (Continued)
Page 23 of 31
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study CIP
$1,000,000.00
2013
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$4,500,000.00
2014
Inflow and Infiltration study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study
$1,000,000.00
2014
Centrifuge backdrive upgrade
$600,000.00
2011
Rebuild two primary clarifiers
$320,000.00
2011
WWTP PLC upgradeand programming, plant controls and
automation study
$655,000.00
2011
Concrete repairs, add control gates, rebuild Grit Chamber gates
$420,000.00
2011
Treatment Plant Automation
$6,000,000.00
2012
Rebuild two primary clarifiers
$320,000.00
2012
Anaerobic digester maintenance and painting
$300,000.00
2012
WWTP rooftop exhaust fan replacement engineering
$120,000.00
2012
WWTP roof top exhaust fan replacement - construction
$900,000.00
2013
New jetter truck and new TV camera and truck
$490,000.00
2013
New jetter truck
$200,000.00
2012
New Phosphorous rule - secondary treatment study
$250,000.00
2015
Fountain Ave. lift station replacement
$500,000.00
2014
Effluent treatment to meet Phosphorous limits. Construction
$30,000,000.00
2016
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years CIP.
$1,000,000.00
2015
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
$5,061,000.00
2015
7.
Financial Management General Comments:
Page 23 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems
Do you have a Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance(CMOM) requirement in your
WPDES permit?
O Yes
• No
Did you have a documented (written records /files, computer files, video tapes, etc.) sanitary sewer I0
M
collection system operation & maintenance or COM program last calendar year?
• Yes (go to question 3)
O No (30 points) (go to question 4
I3. I Check the elements listed below that are included in your Operation and Maintenance (O &M) or 1�
CMOM program.:
Fal
a]
1�
Goals: Describe the specific goals you have for your collection system:
Implement improvements identified in 2010. Continue study of system in 2011
including flow monitoring, implement study recommendations, develop new study
area based on data from previous study. Continue process.
Organization: Do you have the following written organizational elements (check only
those that you have):
® Ownership and governing body description
® Organizational chart
® Personnel and position descriptions
® Internal communication procedures
❑ Public information and education program
Legal Authority: Do you have the legal authority for the following (check only those tr
apply):
® Sewer use ordinance Last Revised MM /DD /YYYY 3/22/2011
® Pretreatment/industrial control Programs
® Fat, Oil and Grease control
® Illicit discharges (commercial, industrial)
® Private property clear water (sump pumps, roof or foundation drains, etc)
® Private lateral inspections /repairs
® Service and management agreements
Maintenance Activities: details in Question 4
Design and Performance Provisions: How do you ensure that your sewer system is
designed and constructed properly?
® State plumbing code
® DNR NR 110 standards
® Local municipal code requirements
® Construction, inspection and testing
❑ Others:
Page 24 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
Page 25 of 31
Overflow Emergency Response Plan: Does your emergency response capability
include (check only those that you have):
® Alarm system and routine testing
® Emergency equipment
® Emergency procedures
® Communications /Notifications (DNR, Internal, Public, Media etc)
® Capacity Assurance: How well do you know your sewer system? Do you have the
following?
® Current and up -to -date sewer map
® Sewer system plans and specifications
® Manhole location map
® Lift station pump and wet well capacity information
® Lift station O &M manuals
Within your sewer system have you identified the following?
® Areas with flat sewers
® Areas with surcharging
® Areas with bottlenecks or constrictions
® Areas with chronic basement backups or SSO's
® Areas with excess debris, solids or grease accumulation
® Areas with heavy root growth
® Areas with excessive infiltration /inflow (1 /1)
® Sewers with severe defects that affect flow capacity
® Adequacy of capacity for new connections
® Lift station capacity and /or pumping problems
❑ Annual Self- Auditing of your O &M /CMOM Program to ensure above components are
being implemented, evaluated, and re- prioritized as needed.
® Special Studies Last Year(check only if applicable):
® Infiltration /Inflow (1 /1) Analysis
❑ Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)
❑ Sewer Evaluation and Capacity Managment Plan (SECAP)
❑ Lift Station Evaluation Report
® Others:
Continuation of sanitary sewer study. Discussions with Sunset Point sanitary
district.
4
Did your sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program include the following
maintenance activities? Complete all that apply and indicate the amount maintained:
Cleaning 49 /o of system /year
Root Removal of system /year
Flow Monitoring 30 /o of system /year
Smoke Testing � /0 of system /year
Page 25 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
Page 26 of 31
Sewer Line Televising 5.3 /o of system /year
Manhole Inspections 76 /o of system /year
Lift Station O &M 1 o4 per L.S /year
Manhole Rehabilitation � /o of manholes rehabed
Mainline Rehabilitation 1.8 /o of sewer lines rehabed
Private Sewer Inspections o.9 /o of system /year
Private Sewer 1/1 Removal of private services
Please include additional comments about your sanitary sewer collection system below:
5
Provide the following collection system and flow information for the past year:
41.27 Total Actual Amount of Precipitation Last Year
31.57 Annual Average Precipitation (for your location)
269.71 Miles of Sanitary Sewer
17 Number of Lift Stations
1 Number of Lift Station Failure
12 Number of Sewer Pipe Failures
12 Number of Basement Backup Occurrences
83 Number of Complaints
12.519 Average Daily Flow in MGD
Page 26 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
24.316 1 Peak Monthly Flow in MGD(if available)
Peak Hourly Flow in MGD(if available)
Page 27 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
Page 28 of 31
NUMBER OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) REPORTED (10 POINTS PER OCCURRENCE)
0
F1
Date
Location
Cause
Estimated
iVolume(MG)
NONE REPORTED
Were there SSOs that occurred last year that are not listed above?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, list the SSOs that occurred:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
0.06 Lift Station Failures(failures /ps /year)
0.04 Sewer Pipe Failures(pipe failures /sewer mile /yr)
0.00 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (number /sewer mile /yr)
0.04 Basement Backups(number /sewer mile)
0.31 Complaints (number /sewer mile)
1.9 Peaking Factor Ratio (Peak Monthly:Annual Daily Average)
0.0 Peaking Factor Ratio(Peak Hourly:Annual daily Average)
6.
Was infiltration /inflow(1 /1) significant in your community last year?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, please describe:
7. ;.;
Has infiltration /inflow and resultant high flows affected performance or created problems in your
collection system, lift stations, or treatment plant at any time in the past year?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, please describe:
8.
Explain any infiltration/inflow(ill) changes this year from previous years?
Page 28 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
sanitary Sewer uonection systems
What is being done to address infiltration /inflow in your collection system?
Consultant continuing on next phase of I & I study and implementation of improvements
identified in 2010 study. Replacement of outdated sanitary sewers during street construction.
Page 29 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2010
WPDES No.0025038
Notes:
A = Voluntary Range
B = Voluntary Range
C = Recommendation Range (Response Required)
D = Action Range (Response Required)
F = Action Range (Response Required)
COMPLIANCE REPORT
Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2010
Resolution or Owner's Statement
NAME OF GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER DATE OF RESOLUTION OR ACTION TAKEN
RESOLUTION NUMBER
ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO SPECIFIC CMAR
SECTIONS (Optional for grade A or B, required for grade C, D, or,'F):
Influent Flow and Loadings:', Grade =A
Effluent Quality: BOD': Grade =A
Effluent Quality: TSS': Grade =A
Effluent Quality: Ammonia: Grade =A
Effluent Quality: Phosphorus: Grade =A
Biosolids Quality and Management: Grade =A
Staffing: Grade =A
Operator Certification: Grade =A
Financial Management: Grade =A
Collection Systems: Grade =A I
ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO THE OVERALL GRADE
POINT AVERAGE AND ANY GENERAL COMMENTS (Optional for G.P.A. greater than or equal to 3.00,
required for G.P.A. less than 3.00) G.P.A.