HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-02JANUARY 11, 2011 11 -02 ORDINANCE
FIRST READING
(CARRIED LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM M -3 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
TO R -3 MULTIPLE DWELLING WTIH A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY / VACANT LOT ON NORTH SIDE OF
OSBORN AVENUE, WEST OF MASON STREET
INITIATED BY: CITY ADMINISTRATION
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved
A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30 -16
(B) OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS.
The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. That Section 30 -16(B) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to
Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by changing the
district character of the following described area from M -3 General Industrial to R -3
Multiple Dwelling with a Planned Development Overlay.
The west 486 feet of Lots 7, 13 and 14, in the NE 1/4, Section 27, 13th Ward, City of
Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin, plus public right -of -way abutting said lot
extending to the centerline of Osborn Avenue.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication.
SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh
enacted Ordinance #10 -XXX APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM M -3 GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL TO R -3 MULTIPLE DWELLING WTIH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY / VACANT LOT ON NORTH SIDE OF OSBORN AVENUE, WEST OF
MASON STREET on January 25, 2011. The Ordinance changes the zoning
classification to R -3 PD. The full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the Office of
the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave. and on the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
Clerk's phone: (920) 236 -5011.
OfHKU
ON THE WATER
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Buric",T,--
Director of Planning Services
DATE: January 6, 2011
RE: Approve Zone Change from M -3 General Industrial to R -3 Multiple Dwelling with a Planned
Development Overlay for the Vacant Lot on North Side of Osborn Avenue, West of Mason
Street (Plan Commission Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND
The approximately 10 acre parcel included within this rezoning request is located at 1400 Osborn Avenue,
approximately 500 feet west of the Osborn Avenue /Mason Street intersection and is currently undeveloped open
space. The property has approximately 600 feet of frontage on Osborn Avenue and is bound on the north with
an established single family neighborhood, the Armory on the west, a 48 unit multiple family residential
development under construction on the east and the Vulcan Quarry on the south across Osborn Avenue. The
site was the former location of a contractors yard /asphalt batch plant but is now vacant open space.
ANALYSIS
The purpose of the City's rezoning request at this site from the M -3 General Industrial District to the R -3
Multiple Dwelling District with Planned Development Overlay is to make the property's zoning consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and to protect the adjacent areas from the potential of inappropriate land use and
development. The owners of the subject property do not desire to voluntarily rezone the parcel as they feel it
would limit the lands marketability as well as increase the taxes. Marketability of the property will change in
that industrial uses will no longer be permitted however residential uses that would be permitted with the
rezoning are more appropriate. The Assessor's office has verified that assessed values on the property will not
change due to the rezoning as the use of the property is not changing. Staff presented three scenarios to the Plan
Commission for consideration which are to leave the zoning unchanged on the property; to leave the underlying
zoning as M -3 but establish a planned development overlay on the property; or to change the underlying zoning
to R -3 with a planned development overlay. The Plan Commission approved the option to change the zoning to
R -3 with a planned development overlay as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use
recommendation and would protect the area from development of a myriad of industrial uses (many extremely
heavy) which are detailed in the attached use comparison tables.
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission approved of this request at its November 16, 2010 meeting.
Approved,
City Manager
ITEM: ZONE CHANGE FROM M -3 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO
R -3 MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT WITH PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400
OSBORN AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of November 16, 2010
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: City of Oshkosh
Owner: Strey Construction, Inc.
Action(s) Requested:
Zone change from M -3 General Industrial District to R -3 Multiple Dwelling District with
Planned Development Overlay.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning
but relies on recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, redevelopment plans and sound
planning principles.
Property Location and Background Information:
The approximately 10 acre parcel included within this rezoning request is located at 1400 Osborn
Avenue, approximately 500 feet west of the Osborn Avenue /Mason Street intersection and is
currently undeveloped open space. The property has approximately 600 feet of frontage on
Osborn Avenue and is bound on the north with an established single family neighborhood, the
Armory on the west, proposed 48 unit multiple family residential on the east and the Vulcan
Quarry on the south across Osborn Avenue. The site was the former location of a contractors
yard /asphalt batch plant but is now vacant open space.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use Z oning
V acant/Undeveloped _ M -3
Adjacent Land Use and Loning
—
Existin
Uses
Zonin
North
Single Family Residences
R -1
South
Industrial - Active Quarry (across Osborn Avenue)
M ... .
East
Vacant Residential – Proposed Multiple Family
R -3 PD
West
Institutional - Armory
R -1
Comprehensi P lan Land Use Reco _ Land Use
10 Year Land Use Recommendation Residential
20 Year Lan Use Recommendation Residential
ANALYSIS
The purpose of the City's rezoning request at this site from the M -3 General Industrial District to
the R -3 Multiple Dwelling District with Planned Development Overlay is to make the property's
zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to protect the adjacent areas from the
potential of inappropriate land use and development.
The topic of rezoning the subject property was briefly discussed within the staff report for the
rezoning of the adjacent property to the east (NW Corner of Osborn and Mason) at the September
21" meeting of the Plan Commission where there was concern expressed that the rezoning of that
one individual property without also rezoning the subject property could be problematic by
allowing the development of industrial uses surrounded on three sides with residential zoning
designation and uses. For that reason, staff feels that both properties should have been zoned for
residential uses together. The owners of the subject property have been contacted to inquire on
the desirability of voluntarily rezoning but felt a rezoning at this time would limit the lands
marketability as well as increase the taxes and therefore have concerns with the rezoning.
Marketability of the property will change in that industrial uses will no longer be permitted,
however staff believes that the residential uses that would be permitted with the rezoning are
more appropriate. Furthermore, the City Property Assessor's Division has stated "even though
the zoning may change on this property the use of the property is not changing, therefore the
assessed value will not change ".
The topic of rezoning the subject property was also a topic of discussion at a November 9`"
neighborhood meeting regarding the proposed development plan for the adjacent property to the
east. Concern and objection over the change to a residential district by the adjacent property
owners to the north was expressed at both the Plan Commission and neighborhood meetings. In
light of the owner's hesitation to rezone and the objections of the nearby residences, staff would
like to expound upon three scenarios for consideration.
SCENARIO 1 — ZONING REMAINS UNCHANGED
Scenario 1 leaves the existing General Industrial zoning designation as -is. This scenario is not
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use recommendation. Furthermore, staff is
uncomfortable with this scenario as it could jeopardize the land -use consistency of the area and
stability of the neighborhood to the north by permitting, without any oversight or review, heavy
industrial uses to be established (see attached use comparison tables).
SCENARIO 2 — UNDERLYING ZONING REMAINS M -3 BUT PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IS ESTABLISHED
Scenario 2 leaves the existing General Industrial zoning designation as -is but adds the protective
Planned Development Overlay zoning designation on the subject property. This scenario is also
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use recommendation. Staff remains
uncomfortable with this scenario as it continues to have the potential of land -use establishment
that is not consistent with the area. However, the Planned Development Overlay has the
protective element of allowing /requiring any proposed physical development to be noticed and
receive comment by surrounding property owners, the public at large, Plan Commission and
requires approval of the Common Council.
Item - 1400 Osborn Rezone 2
SCENARIO 3 — UNDERLYING ZONING CHANGED TO R -3 WITH PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
Scenario 3 changes the zoning designation to the R -3 Multiple Dwelling District designation
with a Planned Development Overlay and is the staff recommendation. This scenario is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use recommendation. The Comprehensive Plan
does not differentiate between single, two or multiple family within its residential land -use
recommendations and relies on a case -by -case review to determine appropriateness of individual
designations. As the property adjacent to the east has been recently rezoned to the R -3 zoning
designation and is proposed to be developed with a multiple family dwelling project, the R -3
designation is consistent with the adjacent land, is the City's lowest density multiple family
dwelling district and can act as a "buffer" between the existing quarry operations to the south and
the adjacent single - family neighborhood to the north. Staff believes that the probability of a
single or two - family housing subdivision being proposed at this location is questionable,
especially in light of the current housing market and the multiple family dwelling use is believed
to be the highest and best use of the property. Additionally, as currently zoned, the property
would allow a myriad of industrial uses (many extremely heavy) with the simple application of a
building permit where the proposed zoning would limit development to much more appropriate
uses (see attached use comparison tables). Additionally, as with scenario 2, the Planned
Development Overlay designation provides additional protection to the area as it requires any
proposed physical development to be noticed and receive comment by surrounding property
owners, the public at large, Plan Commission and receive approval of the Common Council.
RECOMMENDATI
Staff recommends approval of a zone change from M -3 General Industrial District to R -3
Multiple Dwelling District with Planned Development Overlay as requested.
The Plan Commission approved of the zone change to R -3 Multiple Dwelling District with
Planned Development Overlay as requested. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion
on this item.
Mr. Buck presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area, as well as the zoning
classifications and land use in said area. He stated that the City was proposing the zone change
to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which recommends residential use for this area and
to protect the neighborhood from the potential for inappropriate land use and development. He
referred to the list of permitted uses in the M -3 zoning district, many of them heavy industrial
uses, and commented that the City does not want to see these types of uses surrounded by
residential properties. The owner is objecting to the zone change of his property due to the effect
it may have on the marketability of the site and the zone change to R -3 would limit the
development of the site to residential uses only. The Assessors office has verified that the tax
burden will not be affected on the site until such a time that development would occur on the
parcel and the neighbors also prefer the M -3 zoning classification instead of the recommended R-
3 designation. Mr. Buck reviewed the three scenarios detailed in the staff report which are to
leave the zoning unchanged, to leave the zoning as M -3 but establish a Planned Development
Overlay, or to change the zoning to R -3 with a Planned Development Overlay which is the staffs
recommendation.
Mr. Thorns questioned if staff had considered changing the zoning classification to C -1.
Item - 1400 Osborn Re=one 3
Mr. Buck responded that the C -1 classification would have the same concerns with the allowable
commercial uses as the allowable manufacturing uses that could be established on the site as far
as not being compatible with the surrounding residential uses.
Mr. Thorns commented that it would provide the owner with a few more options than the R -3
classification and that he felt the M -3 zoning classification was not appropriate for this area.
Mr. Burich stated that the C -1 designation would allow R -5 Multiple Dwelling District uses
which is the most intensive use and the neighbors do not want the zone change to prevent
multiple family residential development of the site.
Mr. Thorns stated that he did not feel that leaving the M -3 zoning classification on this site was
good planning practice as it would provide the City with no control whatsoever as to the
development of this site and he did not understand why the neighbors would support retaining
this zoning designation.
Mr. Buck responded that neighbors who attended the previous meeting regarding the zone
change of the Rusch property were not in favor of a zone change for this site either.
Mr. Burich added that he attended the neighborhood meeting for the apartment development and
the zone change for this site was discussed as well and everyone at the meeting was opposed to a
zone change to R -3 as they did not want multi- family housing developed on the site.
Stuart Strey, owner of the property, stated that the storage units to the east and the Vulcan Quarry
across Osborn Avenue were both zoned M -3 and even if Mr. Rusch's property was rezoned to R-
3, he did not feel that the City should have the right to impose their will on him to change to the
R -3 zoning classification as well. The neighbors are opposed to the multi - family use and the
uses allowed in the M -3 district are not all bad. He referred to the list of permitted uses and
commented that there were 184 permitted uses in the M -3 district compared to 14 uses in the R -3
district which would decrease the marketability of his property. He concluded with his
property's zoning classification should not be changed due to the change of Mr. Rusch's parcel.
Ron Abitz, 1125 Canterbury Drive, questioned who decided that it is not feasible to have this
property zoned R -1 or R -2 instead of the R -3 classification.
Mr. Buck replied that single - family homes were not likely to be developed on this site and
therefore the zoning classification of R -1 would not be the highest and best use of the land. Even
if the zoning designation was changed to R -3, it could still be divided and developed for single -
family uses.
Kris Villars, 1325 Kensington Avenue, questioned if the easement on the Rusch property of 75
feet along the north side of the parcel would extend to the Strey property as well. She
commented on the path that water runs through the property as the land is higher in one area and
voiced her concern about drainage issues. She also discussed her concerns with children in the
area while the quarry is still operational and rumors of the Strey property being contaminated
land.
Ms. Smith stated that she wanted to retain the M -3 zoning status on this property as she thought
that any offensive or inappropriate uses of the land would not be allowed.
Item - 1400 Osborn Rezone 4
Mr. Fojtik responded that the City cannot prevent the use of the property for any purpose
providing that it is zoned appropriately for said use.
Ms. Smith commented that she had heard rumors that this property was contaminated and
questioned if the City would do testing to determine if this was true.
Mr. Burich replied that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) handles testing of
contaminated lands and he was aware that there was a file on this site but it was closed at this
time. Any approvals would have to be obtained from the DNR at such a time that development
would commence on the site.
Ms. Smith commented that she was torn on her feelings about the zone change issue now that she
was aware that uses could be established on the site with the M -3 zoning classification without
prior notice or public hearing to discuss the neighbors concerns or objections. She still had
concerns about the contamination on the site.
Mr. Burich responded that contaminated sites can be developed but plans would require approval
by the DNR and this site is no different than the redevelopment areas on Marion Road that are
currently under development after remediation efforts to clean up the contamination.
Ms. Smith stated that she would like to know what Mr. Strey's intentions are for the property and
the impacts of the easement agreement and contamination issues.
Mr. Buck replied that the easement and contamination issues would have to be addressed at the
time of development of the property. The site can be cleaned up if it is determined by the DNR
to be contaminated and the easement agreement is a private document between owners of the
parcels. Without any private easement, there would be a required 25 foot setback on the site for
residential uses.
Mr. Borsuk commented that it was very interesting what is permitted in the M -3 zoning district
and he felt it was unusual that neighbors would rather have the M -3 district adjacent to their
property rather than the proposed R -3.
Mr. Fojtik questioned if there was an urgent or impaling need to act on this at the present time.
Mr. Hinz stated that the property owner was opposed to the zone change and it appears that it
will reduce the sale value of the land. He further stated that he would like to believe that the
owner would not put an offensive or inappropriate use on the site and it is his property and he
should not be forced to have the zoning classification changed.
Mr. Thorns commented that although it has been stated that the neighbors are opposed to this
zone change, there are only three present today and two of them do not seem sure of it. There
will be no additional tax burden due to this change and although it may reduce the sale value of
the property, the City should protect the neighborhood from the potential uses of this site with the
M -3 zoning classification. It is not good planning practice to leave this site as is and we have
addressed these issues in other areas of the City in the past. The quarry is still operational at this
time but will cease to exist at some point in the future.
Mr. Hinz commented that the property owner did not request this zone change and he felt that
government was overstepping their boundaries.
Item - 1400Osborn Rezone 5
Ms. Lohry agreed with Mr. Thorns that the property should be changed to the R -3 zoning district
as this area has developed into a residential neighborhood and the land is still marketable with a
residential zoning classification.
Mr. Vajgrt agreed and stated that this property has been vacant for 20 years and it still could be
developed with the R -3 zoning designation.
Mr. Burich stated that down zoning is not uncommon in the city and is not always with 100%
support of the property owners. He gave several examples of previous areas that were down
zoned in the city. The change from M -3 to R -3 would limit the potential uses to 14 -15 from over
100 uses but the land would still be marketable.
Mr. Thorns questioned if the owner could petition to have the zoning changed on the property if
the future sale of the land was for a use not permitted in the R -3 district.
Mr. Buck responded affirmatively and stated that it would come back to the Plan Commission
and Common Council for consideration at that time and the zoning could be adjusted if the
proposed use was appropriate.
Mr. Hinz inquired if a planned development could be placed on the property but retain the M -3
zoning classification.
Mr. Buck replied that this was scenario #2 in the staff report however the issue with this choice
was that the use could not be prevented if found to be incompatible with residential uses, but it
would allow review of the site layout only.
Motion by Borsuk to approve a zone change from M -3 General Industrial District to R -3
Multiple Dwelling District with Planned Development Overlay for property located at
1400 Osborn Avenue.
Seconded by Vajgrt. Motion carried 5 -1. Ayes- BorsuklThoms /Fojtik/Lohry/Vajgrt.
Nays -Hinz.
Item - 1400 Osborn Re_one
R-3 to M -3 Zoning Use Comparison
P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use X = Not Allowed P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use X = Not Allowed
USE
R -3
M-3
Accessory Structure
P
P
Acid Manufacturer
X
C
Agricultural
X
X
AirstripslLanding Field (agricultural related)
X
X
Animal Hospftal (excluding open kennel)
X
P
Animal Husbandry
X
X
Antique Sales
X
P
Appliance Manufacturing
X
P
Appliance Repair Shop
X
P
Appliance Store
X
P
Aquatic Nursery
X
P
Art Center
C
P
Art Gallery
X
P
Art Shop
X
P
Asphalt/Concrete Batch Plant
X
C
Auction Establishment
X
P
Auto Body Shop
X
P
Automobile Garage
X
P
Automobile Sales
X
P
Automobile Service Facility (excluding body shop)
X
C
Electrical Supplies (wholesale & distributing)
X
P
Bakery (on premise sales only)
X
P
Bakery (manufacturing, packaging)
X
P
Banks
X
P
Barber Shop
X
P
Barns
X
X
Beauty Shop
X
P
Bed and Breakfast Inn
X
X
Beekeeping
X
X
Beer Depot
X
P
Beverage Manufacturing
X
P
Billiard Room
X
P
Blacksmith
X
P
Boarding /Rooming House
C
X
Boathouse
P
X
Book Store (retail)
X
P
Bottling of Beverages
X
P
Bowling Alley
X
P
Bus Depot
X
P
Bus Garage
X
P
Bus Repair Shop
X
P
Food Products Packing
X
P
Candy Manufacturing
X
P
Candy Store
X
P
Cash Crops
X
X
Caterer
X
P
Cement Manufacturing
X
C
Cemetery
C
P
Charitable Institutions
X
X
Church
C
P
Cigar /Cigarette Manufacturing
X
P
Cleaners (collection & distribution only)
X
P
Cleaners (commercial)
X
P
Clinic
X
P
Clothing Manufacturing
X
P
Clothing Store (retail)
X
P
Clubs, private
X
P
Clubs & Semi - Public Structures
X
X
Coffee & Tea Store
X
P
Colleges (including residence halls)
X
X
Commercial/Residential Structures
X
X
Community Centers
C
P
Concrete /Asphalt Batch Plant
X
C
Condenseries
X
X
Confectionary Store
X
P
Contractor's Yard
X
P
Convenience Foods, Prepackaged
(wholesaleldistdbuting)
X
P
Convention Hall
X
P
Cosmetic Manufacturing
X
P
Creameries
X
X
Crockery Store (retail)
X
P
USE
R -3
M -3
Dairying
X
X
Dance Hall
X
P
Dancing School
X
P
Day Care Center
C
C
Day Care Center, Family (6 or less children)
P
X
Day Care Center, Family (9 or more children)
C
X
Delicatessen
X
P
Dental Office
X
P
Directional Sign for Hotel/Motel
X
C
Distributing Establishment
X
P
Dormitories
X
X
Dress Shop (retail)
X
P
Drive- Up/Drive -Thru Restaurant
X
C
Drug Store
Dry Cleaners (collection & distribution only)
Dry Goods Store (retail)
X
X
X
P
P
P
Dwelling, Multiple Family
P
X
Dwelling, Single Family
P
X
Dwelling, Two Family
P
X
Dyeing Establishment
Dyer (retail, collection & distribution only)
X
X
P
P
Educationallnstitution
X
C
Electrical Supplies (retail)
X
P
Electrical Supplies (wholesale & distributing)
X
P
Elementary Schools (public & private)
C
X
Enameling Establishment
X
P
Engraving Establishment
X
P
Exhibition Hall
X
P
Explosive Manufacturing & Storage
X
C
Extraction of Sand/GravellOther Raw Materials
X
C
Family Day Care Center (8 or less children)
P
X
Family Day Care Center (9 or more children)
C
X
Fat Rendering
X
C
Feed Lots
X
X
Fertilizer Manufacturing
X
C
Field Crops, Raising of
X
X
Fish Farms
X
X
Fish Market (retail)
X
P
Fish Market (wholesale)
X
P
Flea Market
X
X
Floriculture
X
X
Florist Shop (retail)
X
P
Food Products (retail)
X
P
Food Products Packing
X
P
Forestry
X
X
Fratemity or Sorority House
X
X
Freight House
X
P
Fruit & Garden Produce Roadside Stand
X
X
Fruit & Vegetable Store
X
P
Funeral Home
C
P
Fur Farms
Furniture Upholstering /Refinishing /Repairs /Sales
X
X
X
P
Garbage or Rubbish Dumping
X
C
Gift Shop
X
P
Glue Manufacturing
X
C
Governmental Structure
C
P
Grazing
X
X
Greenhouse(
C
P
Grocery Store
X
P
Group Homes: Less than 8 persons
P
X
More than 9 persons
P
X
Less than 15 persons
P
X
More than 16 persons
C
X
Gypsum Manufacturing
X
C
Halfway House
C
X
Hardware Store
X
P
Hay
X
X
Heating Supply Store
X
P
High Schools (including Junior High)
C
X
P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use X =Not Allowed
P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use X = Not Allowed
USE
R -3
M -3
Heating Supply Store
X
P
High Schools (including Junior High)
C
X
Hobby Store
X
P
Hogs, Raising of
X
X
Hoisery Shop
X
P
Home Occupation
P
X
Homeless Shelter /Center
X
X
Horticultural
X
X
Hospital, Mental or Psychiatric
X
X
Hospital
C
P
Hotel
X
X
Hotel/Motel Directional Sign
X
C
Petroleum Refining
X
C
Ice Cream Store
X
P
Insurance Office
X
P
Interior Decorating Studio
X
P
Philanthropic Institution
Jail /Prison
X
P
Jewelry Store
X
P
Junior High School
C
X
Junk Yard
X
C
Plaster of Paris Manufacturing
X
C
Kennel
X
X
Kindergarten School
C
X
Knitting Mill
X
P
Poultry Farms
X
X
Laboratory (experimental or testing)
X
P
Laundromat (coin operated)
X
P
Laundry Service Establishment
X
P
Libraries
X
P
Lime Manufacturing
X
C
Liquor Store, Packaged
X
P
Livestock Raising
X
X
Lodges and Clubs (private)
X
P
Lodging /Boarding House
X
X
Lunchroom
X
P
Race Track (automobile)
X
C
Machine Shop
X
P
Marina
X
P
Meat and Fish Market
X
P
Medical Office
X
P
Mental or Psychiatric Hospital
X
X
Metal Stamp Manufacturing
X
P
Migratory Laborer Housing
X
X
Mink, Raising of
X
X
Monument Sales
Mobile Home Park (excluding commercial sale of}
Motel
X
C
X
P
X
X
Motel /Hotel Directional Sign
X
C
Multiple Dwellings
P
X
Municipal Structures
C
P
Museums
C
P
Music Store
X
P
Musical Instrument Manufacturing
X
P
Rdside Stand, Garden/Orchard Produce
oa
X
X
News Agency (except printing & publishing)
X
P
News Stand
X
P
Newspaper Printing
X
P
Notions Store
X
P
Novelty Manufacture
X
P
Nurseries & Commercial Greenhouses
C
P
Nursery School
C
X
Nursing Home
C
P
Sheet Metal Product Manufacturing
X
P
Office Supply Manufacturing
X
P
Oil Drilling
Open Storage (NOT junk, autos, salvage, etc)
Optical Store
X
X
X
C
P
P
Orchards
X
X
Orchards and Tree Farms
X
X
Outdoor Motor Vehicle Racing or Test Track
I X
I C
USE
R -3
M -3
Packaged Liquor Store
X
P
Paddocks
X
X
Paint Store
X
P
X
P
Painting Establishment
aper ro u s anu ac ure (not paper pu p
X I
P
Parking Lot
C
P
Parks
P
P
Parochial School, Elementary
C
X
Parochial School, Jr. High & High School
C
X
Pasturage
X
X
Pet Shop (excluding open kennel)
X
P
Petroleum Refining
X
C
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
X
P
Pharmacy
X
P
X
P
Philanthropic Institution
Photographers Studio
X
P
Photographers Supplies
X
P
Picture Framing Store
X
P
Pipe Store
X
P
Plaster of Paris Manufacturing
X
C
Plastic Goods Manufacturing
X
P
Plumbing Supply Store
X
P
Pool Room
X
P
Poultry Farms
X
X
Printing Establishment
X
P
Prison/Jail
X
P
Private Clubs or Lodges
X
P
Professional Service Office
X
P
Psychiatric or Mental Hospital
X
X
Public Parks
P
P
Public Recreation Structure
X
P
Public Utility Structure
C
C
Duany, Extraction of Sand, is
X
C
Race Track (automobile)
X
C
Radio Broadcasting Studio
X
P
Radio Relay Structure
X
P
Radio Store (retail}
X
P
Railroad Depot
X
P
Railroad Yard
X
C
Real Estate Office
X
P
Recreational Structure, Public
X
P
Repair /Service of Vehicles
X
P
Refining Operation
X
X
Refreshment Stand
X
P
Religious Structure
X
X
Restaurant
X
P
Restaurant w /Drive -Up or Drive -Thru
X
C
Retirement Community
P
X
Riding Stable
X
X
Rdside Stand, Garden/Orchard Produce
oa
X
X
Rooming /Boarding House
C
X
Rubber Products Manufacturing
X
P
Rubber Stamp Manufacturing
X
I P
Sanitarium
X
X
Schools, Private & Public
C
X
Vocational
X
X
Semi - Public Structures & Clubs
X
X
Service Industry (laundry, cleaning & dyeing)
X
P
Sheet Metal Product Manufacturing
X
P
Shoe Repair
X
P
Shoe Store (retail)
X
P
Shooting Range, Private
X
Sign Manufacturing
X
P
Silos
X
X
Single Family Dwelling
P
X
Skating Rink
X
P
Slaughterhouse
X
C
Sludge Dispoal
X
X
P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use X = Not Allowed
USE
R -3
M-3
Smelting (tin/coppedzinc/iron ore)
X
C
Sod Farming
X
X
Soda Fountain
X
P
Soft Drink Stand
X
P
Sorority or Fraternity House
X
X
Sporting Goods Manufacturing
X
P
Stables
X
X
Stationary Store
X
P
Stockyards
X
C
Substance Abuse Treatment Facility
X
X
Swimming Club, Private (non - profit)
C
X
Tailor Shop
X
P
Tannery
X
C
Tavern
X
P
Tea and Coffee Store
X
P
Telecommunication Towers/Antennas
X
P
Television Broadcasting Studio
X
P
Television Relay Structure
X
P
Television Repair Shop
X
P
Television Store
X
P
Theater (except drive -in)
X
P
Tinsmithing
X
P
Tobacco Store
X
P
Toiletry Manufacture
X
P
Toy Manufacture
X
P
Tree Farms and Orchards
X
X
Truck Farming
X
X
Truck Terminal
X
P
Two Family Dwelling.
P
X
Universities, Including Residence Halls
X
X
Utility Structures, public
C
C
Vegetable and Fruit Store
X
P
Viticulture
X
X
Vocational School
X
X
Warehouse
Water Heating Equipment Manufacturing
Water Treating Equipment Manufacturing
Wild Crop Harvesting
X
X
X
X
P
P
P
X
Wireless Telecommunication Towers /Antennas
X
P
Wholesale Establishment
X
P
Wholesale Market
X
P
Wood Products Mfg. (exc mfg of paper pulp &
plastics)
X
I P
u
REZONE - VACANT LOT OSBORN
PC: 11 -16 -10
DEHART CHRISTOPHER
STEINER ELIZABETH
1307 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
WOLLERSHEIM JEFFREY /TRINA
1335 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
PROUD WAYNE /KRISTINE S
1405 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
RUSCH THOMAS N
GABERT RICHARD
PO BOX 3808
OSHKOSH WI 54903 3808
RE OSBORN AV VACANT LOT
STINGLE CHAD M /KRISTINA
1230 DEVONSHIRE DR
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6235
HASSLER KATIE
1225 DEVONSHIRE DR
OSHKOSH WI 54902
SISTERS OF THE SORROWFUL
MOTHER GENERALA
9056 N DEERBROOK TRL
MILWAUKEE WI 53223
RE 1145 DEVONSHIRE DR
KOSMER JOHN F
1315 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
SMITH CYNTHIA A
1345 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
SCHNEIDER DENNIS R /SHARON
1425 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
LENTZ SCOTT A /AMY M
1124 MASON ST
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6255
WIS DEPT OF MILITARY AFFRS
2400 WRIGHT ST
MADISON WI 53704
RE 1415 ARMORY PLC
KOTSCHI ADOLF D
1303 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
VILLARS KRISTINE S
1325 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
SIEBER NANCY L
1355 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
ROBLEE MATTHEW T /SARA G
1435 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
STREY CONSTRUCTION INC
5037 RIVERMOOR DR
OMRO WI 54963 9428
RE MASON ST VACANT LOT
VULCAN LANDS INC
1000 E WARRENVILLE RD 100
NAPERVILLE IL 60563 1444
RE 1301 KNAPP ST
JV I
I
I
1
g
1
�. I
roomeRv
1415 ARMORY PL
rig'
] -
m • II�:R%H3
HE
�
fi s
�C
DISCLAIMER
This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and It is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing Is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh Is not re-
sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
REZONING PETITION
OSBORN AV VACANT LOT
Scale: 1" = 200'
N O.f HK IH
A ON THE WATER
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
10/14/10
Created by - dff
N N W
eI
0
T a
�1 AI
r�
L «,IML' ll'
Al Awn
'Mop.
or .
man
m 111
iI 11 1
NI�'fllr■
, Y 1 lop,
A. I A
II �I
M
16
II to ., 4 EJ
0,
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it is not intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and it is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepencies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
OSBORN AV VACANT LOT
Scale: 1 " = 200'
N OIHKOf H
A ON THE WATEfi
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
10/1411
I DISCLAIMER REZONING PETITION