HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-363NOVEMBER 23, 2010 10 -363 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7 -0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AT NORTHWEST
CORNER OF OSBORN AVENUE & MASON STREET
INITIATED BY: GABERT & RUSCH
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved with conditions
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a planned
residential development for construction of 6 eight unit two -story apartment buildings,
and associated amenities, at the northwest corner of Osborn Avenue and Mason Street,
per the attached, is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1) Curbing be installed along all parking facility areas, excluding the ingress /egress
driveways.
2) Pedestrian walks, at least 5 feet wide, connecting all apartment buildings to each
other and refuse areas be included as well as walk areas be designated leading
from the internal walk system to both street rights -of -way.
3) Additional vegetative screening be installed along the northern property line to
act as a buffer to the properties to the north, per approval of the Community
Development Department.
4) Base standard modification to allow a subdivision /development sign, no taller
than 10 feet or greater than 40 square feet of sign area (all sides).
5) Detention basin is designed without riprap above the water line and native plants
be planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety
shelf.
O,f HKOf H
ON THE WATER
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Burich
Director of Planning Services
DATE: November 18, 2010
RE: Approve Planned Development for Construction of a Multiple Family Development at
Northwest Corner of Osborn Avenue and Mason Street (Plan Commission
Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND
The 4.6 acre parcel is located at the northwest corner of Osborn Avenue and Mason Street and is
currently undeveloped open space. The property is a corner lot with approximately 500 feet of
frontage on Osborn Avenue and approximately 470 feet of frontage on Mason Street. The property is
bound on the north with an established single family neighborhood, vacant industrial (formerly Strey
Construction and asphalt batch plant) on the west, mini - warehousing on the east across Mason Street
and the Vulcan Quarry on the south across Osborn Avenue. The petitioner received approval of a zone
change of the subject property from M -3 General Industrial to R -3 Multiple Dwelling District zoning
designation with a Planned Development Overlay on October 26, 2010. A neighborhood meeting to
present the development plan proposal was held with area property owners on November 9, 2010.
ANALYSIS
The proposed development plan includes the construction of six eight -unit two -story apartment
buildings (48 units), five garage structures (48 garage stalls) and parking facilities that include 62
surface parking stalls (6 handicap and 8 guest). Overall height of the structures is 28 feet with the
exterior proposed to be entirely brick with front dormers and second floor balconies. Density is
considered medium -high but is 30% less than the density permitted within the R -3 zoning district. The
apartment complex is designed with four buildings on the western edge of the development area and
two closer to Mason Street with a 75 foot wide open area located on the northern property edge and
areas of greenspace adjacent to each building. Vehicular access to the development is proposed to be
provided by two driveways located on Mason Street and Osborn Avenue which will circle within the
complex providing access to all buildings. Curbing for all parking areas and pedestrian walks within
the development are not designated on the plans but will be required to be included. Signage is also
not identified on the plans but staff is recommending a monument sign no taller than ten feet or greater
than 40 square feet situated to meet setback requirements. Landscaping plans submitted appear to be
high quality but do not meet code requirements at parking lot perimeters and will require approval at
the time of building permit issuance. Property owners to the north have expressed the desire to have
additional vegetative screening installed at the northern lot line and staff supports this as it would
create a buffer area between the proposed use and the existing homes. Stormwater management is
identified in the form of a detention basin situated between the proposed garages and building six on
Mason Street with formal plans requiring approval by the Department of Public Works.
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission approved of this request at its November 16, 2010 meeting.
Approved,
'� / j�:d 4 "a-
City Manager
ITEM: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CRE ATION OF A
MULTIPLE FAMILY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OSBORN AVENUE AND
MASON STREET
Plan Commission meeting of November 16, 2010
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Thomas Rusch
Owner: Richard L. Gabert & Thomas N. Rusch
Actions Requested:
Approval of a development plan for a multiple family dwelling development that includes:
Six 8 -unit apartment buildings (48 units)
Five detached garage structures (48 garage stalls)
Surface off - street parking facility (62 stalls)
Stormwater detention area and open spaces
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria and guidelines for the Planned Development overlay
district in Section 30 -33 of the Oshkosh Municipal Code.
Property Location and Type:
The 4.6 acre parcel included within this development plan review request is located at the
northwest corner of Osborn Avenue and Mason Street and is currently undeveloped open space.
The property is a corner lot with approximately 500 feet of frontage on Osborn Avenue and
approximately 470 feet of frontage on Mason Street. The property is bound on the north with an
established single family neighborhood, vacant industrial (formerly Strey Construction and asphalt
batch plant) on the west, mini - warehousing on the east across Mason Street and the Vulcan Quarry
on the south across Osborn Avenue. The petitioner received approval of a zone change of the
subject property from M -3 General Industrial to R -3 Multiple Dwelling District zoning designation
with a Planned Development Overlay on October 26, 2010. A neighborhood meeting to present
the development plan proposal was held with area property owners on November 9, 2010.
Subiect Site
Existin Land Use I Zonin
Vacant/U R 3 P
A djacent - Land Us and Coning
Existing
Uses
Zonin
North
Single-Family Residences ...._
R 1 ...
h
South
_ ........ .... __ ... . ....__.
Indust... rial - Active Quarry (across Osborn Avenue)
M 3
___
.. . ....
East
. ... ... ..._ .......
Industrial Warehousing (across Mason Street)
.............. ..........
M 3
West
_ .. _ .. .1-1.1-1--.1 ... ..........
Vacant Industrial - Former Contractor Yard
M -3
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
10 Year Land Use Recommendation Residential
20 Year Land Use Recommendation Residential
ANALYSIS
Design/Layout
The proposed development plan includes the construction of six eight -unit two -story apartment
buildings (48 units), five garage structures (48 garage stalls) and parking facilities that include 62
surface parking stalls (6 handicap and 8 guest). Density is considered medium -high at
approximately 10.4 units per acre (one unit per 4,200 square feet), which is approximately 30%
less than the density permitted within the R -3 zoning district (67 units, 14.5 units per acre /one unit
per 3,000 square feet). Green space constitutes 61% of the site while impervious surfaces (roads &
buildings) constitute approximately 39% of the total land area.
The apartment complex is designed as a campus with four of the six buildings on the western edge
of the development area and the remaining two buildings closer to Mason Street on the eastern
portion of the development area. A large 75 foot wide open area is located on the northern
property edge and areas of greenspace are adjacent to each building. An area is designated for
stormwater detention and is sited between the proposed garages and building six on Mason Street.
Each apartment building contains eight two - bedroom apartments each with a single garage space
and shared 10 -11 surface stalls located adjacent to the buildings.
Access
Vehicular access to the development is proposed to be provided in the form of two 24 foot wide
driveways, one located on Mason Street and the other on Osborn Avenue. These drives will circle
within the complex to provide access to all the apartment buildings, garages and parking areas
while also providing full circulation from street to street. The submitted plans do not designate
curbing on -site and staff would point out and reinforce with recommendation that curbing is
required within the Municipal Code for all multiple - family parking areas, excluding the
ingress /egress driveways.
Pedestrian walks are not currently located on either Osborn Avenue or Mason Street and internal
pedestrian walks are not included within the development plan. Staff believes that walks, at least
five foot wide, connecting all apartment buildings to each other and refuse areas should be
included as part of the sites development and also believes walk areas leading to both street rights -
of -way should be designated (not required to be built until public walks are installed) to provide
protected /safe pedestrian access internally and for access to the local roadway.
Siege
A subdivision/development sign has been discussed at the southeast corner of the Osborn Avenue
and Mason Street intersection, but is not identified on the plan. The Municipal Code permits only
a small amount of ground signage for residential districts (maximum of 16 square feet for all sides)
and staff understands that larger developments such as this have unique identification issues.
Therefore staff is recommending a base standard modification to allow a monument sign for
development identification no taller than ten feet or greater than 40 square feet (20 square feet per
side) of sign area. The sign must be situated to meet setback requirements.
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
Landscaping
A landscape plan has been submitted with the proposal that appears to be high quality but does not
appear to meet code requirements as to location of plant materials at parking lot perimeters. Staff
would like to point out that landscaping will be required to be reviewed at time of building permit
issuance. Additionally, during the neighborhood meeting, property owners to the north expressed
a desire for additional vegetative screening to be installed at the northern lot line. Staff is in
support of the additional screening in this area as it will help to create a buffer area between the
proposed use and the existing single - family uses to the north.
Stormwater Detention
Stormwater management is identified in the form of a detention basin situated between the
proposed garages and building six on Mason Street. Formal erosion control, drainage and
stormwater management plans must be approved by the Department of Public Works and staff
suggests that a more "natural" style of detention basin be utilized involving planting of emergent
plants in the safety shelf area and native plants on the side slopes rather than the use of riprap as it
is better functioning, environmentally friendly, is a deterrent to intrusion and more aesthetically
pleasing.
Building Elevations
The apartment buildings are two -story buildings with an overall height of approximately 28 feet.
The inclusion of front dormers and second floor balconies help to break up the overall mass of the
main roof and provide some building articulation. The exterior is proposed to be entirely brick and
fagades also include entry doors, patio screen doors, windows and air conditioning units.
RECOMMENDATION /CONDITIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan for the multifamily apartment development
with the following conditions:
1) Curbing is installed along all parking facility areas, excluding the ingress /egress
driveways.
2) Pedestrian walks, at least five foot wide, connecting all apartment buildings to each
other and refuse areas are included as well as walk areas be designated leading from the
internal walk system to both street rights -of -way.
3) Additional vegetative screening is installed along the northern property line to act as a
buffer to the properties to the north, per approval of the Department of Community
Development..
4) Base standard modification to allow the subdivision/development sign, no taller than
ten feet or greater than 40 square feet of sign area (all sides).
5) Detention basin is designed without riprap above the water line and native plants be
planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety shelf.
The Plan Commission approved the development plan as requested with conditions noted. The
following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Mr. Buck presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and
zoning classifications in said area. He stated that the parcel had received approval for a zone
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
change in October, 2010, and a neighborhood meeting was held in November to give the neighbors
an opportunity to discuss the proposed plans with the developer. He reviewed the site plan
consisting of the above mentioned features and commented that the proposed development was
less dense than what is permitted in the R -3 zoning classification. He reviewed the large open area
on the north side of the property which would serve as a buffer area between the apartment
development and the single - family homes to the north and reviewed the drive accesses on Mason
Street and Osborn Avenue. He discussed the addition of pedestrian walks within the development
and leading to the right -of -way and signage for the site which was not submitted with the plans.
Staff was recommending a base standard modification for a monument -type sign and Mr. Buck
also reviewed the landscape plan which requires some adjustment to landscaping materials around
the perimeter of the parking areas. He also discussed additional landscaping for screening on the
north side of the site and the location of the detention pond which will require approval by the
Department of Public Works. He reviewed the building elevations and conditions recommended
for this request.
Mr. Hinz suggested that the signage recommended for the site could be smaller and have two
signs, one at each drive access, instead of one larger one on the corner.
Mr. Buck responded that the developer did not specify what was desired for signage and the
architect was the party that implied that one sign located on the corner of the development would
be desirable.
Ms. Lohry inquired how many bedrooms would be in the apartment units.
Mr. Buck replied that all the units were proposed to be two bedroom apartments.
Ms. Lohry also inquired if there would be a recreational area on the site for children to play and
would these apartments be low- income housing.
Mr. Buck responded that there was no designated "tot lot" on the site plans however there were
greenspace areas within the development and the apartments were not going to be low- income
housing.
Mr. Thorns questioned how staff came up with the height of ten feet for the development sign as it
seemed excessive in his opinion.
Mr. Buck replied that there was a 25 foot setback from the right -of -way for the placement of the
sign and if you install a 5 foot sign, it would allow additional space for ornamentation and
vegetation around the base of the sign which is more aesthetically pleasing.
Stuart Strey, 5037 Rivermoor Drive, Omro, stated that he owns the property adjacent to the
proposed development and there is currently a 75 foot private easement on the north side of the
development site for access to his property. He questioned if they desired to develop the currently
vacant site, would they still be able to use the easement area for an access point.
Mr. Buck responded that the driveway would have to be constructed to meet code requirements
and it would have to be relocated as it could not be constructed on private property. It may be
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
necessary to obtain a variance from the Board of Appeals depending on the layout of the site and
location of a new drive access.
Mr. Burich added that we currently do not have a copy of the easement agreement available and
we would have to look into the matter to see if the City was party to the easement.
Mr. Palmeri left the meeting at 4: 59 pm.
Cindy Smith, 1345 Kensington Avenue, stated that she attended the neighborhood meeting last
week to discuss the development plans and she still had concerns about the drainage issues. She
wanted to know how high up the whole development would be and if the sewer system in the area
would be able to handle the runoff from the site.
Mr. Buck replied that the grading plan would be required to direct the stormwater runoff to drain
into the detention pond on the site and that developments are not allowed to cause a negative
impact on neighboring properties.
Ms. Smith commented that there were flooding issues in their neighborhood and was concerned
with additional runoff from this site.
Mr. Buck responded that the detention pond was constructed to collect runoff from the site and
release it more slowly to alleviate flooding issues.
Mr. Gohde added that the City ordinance requires that post development numbers relating to
stormwater runoff are required to be less than pre - development statistics and the water flow would
have to be reduced for this site after it is developed. He further stated that this area is located on
the fringe of the Campbell Creek basin and the proposed development should not make the
situation worse.
Mr. Thorns questioned if the proposed Armory basin, when constructed, would provide flooding
relief to this area.
Mr. Gohde responded affirmatively.
Mr. Thorns then questioned if the developer is responsible to control stormwater on his property.
Mr. Gohde replied that the development has to retain stormwater runoff on its own site and cannot
discharge it to adjacent properties and would have to be connected to the City storm sewer system.
He gave further explanation of detention requirements in 10 and 100 year storm events.
Ms. Lohry inquired if the development is building up the site, how is the runoff handled.
Mr. Gohde reiterated that stormwater cannot be discharged on to neighboring properties and that
grading is monitored during the development process.
Ms. Smith questioned what the depth of the detention pond would be as she was concerned for the
children's safety in the area.
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
Mr. Gohde responded that plans for the detention pond have not yet been submitted at this time
and the depth would be based upon achieving the necessary requirements for the site.
Ms. Smith commented that she was concerned with the impact this development would have on
the neighborhood as this area was all single- family homes and she does not feel that the apartments
would be good for the area. She voiced her concerns again about the drainage issues, the detention
pond, the screening on the north side of the site, and the fact that there was no proposed screening
for the west side or any fencing enclosing the property. She also commented about the patios on
the back side of the units and if the residents of the apartments would be able to see into her
backyard. She also had concerns about the number of people who would be living in the units, the
additional traffic in the area, and the lack of a playground area on the site for the children.
Tom Rusch, 3801 State Road 21, stated that he has been building apartments in Oshkosh for over
25 years and he did not realize that curbing was now required in the parking lot areas. He further
stated that no curbing was on Mason Street or Osborn Avenue and it seemed to make more sense
to put the curbing on the outside on the street than within the development area. He felt that the
apartments were essentially no different than single- family homes and that placing curbing along
all the internal parking areas make snow removal difficult and he hoped that the City would
consider changing this requirement for residential parking lots in the future.
Ms. Lohry inquired if the practice of pushing the snow onto the grass areas was creating a muddy
situation.
Mr. Rusch responded that it was no different than snow blowing the snow onto your lawn at a
single family residence.
Mr. Thorns questioned what the reasoning was behind the requirement for internal curbing in
parking lots.
Mr. Burich replied that it was a requirement for commercial, industrial, and multi- family uses for
the protection of landscaping and shrubbery as well as stormwater drainage purposes.
Motion by Borsuk to approve a development plan for the creation of a multiple family
apartment development on property located at the northwest corner of Osborn Avenue and
Mason Street as requested with the following conditions:
1) Curbing is installed along all parking facility areas, excluding the ingress /egress
driveways.
2) Pedestrian walks, at least five foot wide, connecting all apartment buildings to each
other and refuse areas are included as well as walk areas be designated leading from
the internal walk system to both street rights -of -way.
3) Additional vegetative screening is installed along the northern property line to act as a
buffer to the properties to the north, per approval of the Department of Community
Development.
4) Base standard modification to allow the subdivision /development sign, no taller than
ten feet or greater than 40 square feet of sign area (all sides).
5) Detention basin is designed without riprap above the water line and native plants be
planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety shelf.
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
Seconded by Vajgrt.
Mr. Hinz stated that he lived in an apartment complex in the past very similar to this with no
playground area and detention ponds on site and children did not play in the ponds. He further
stated that residents in this type of housing have a tendency to keep to themselves and their
children will find places to play without providing a designated area. He commented that he felt
neighbors were concerned with the worse case scenario and he did not feel this development
would have a negative impact on the area.
Mr. Thorns commented that he felt this development was appropriate land use for this site and that
detention ponds are a good thing and are a way of life in Oshkosh. He further commented that he
has not heard of any issues with ponds on other sites in the City.
Motion carried 6 -0.
Item - NW Osborn and Mason -MF PD
L X
CV HI<DIH
ON THE WATER
Petitioner. I C. 6 L I e
City of Oshkosh Application
Planned Development Review
Conditional Use Permit Review
• •PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK•'
SUBMIT TO:
Dept of Community Development
215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130
PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
Date: /0 - 25 — /o
Petitioner's Address: P 6Oy, 3m b d City: 0 6 4 kos h State: 0! zip: 551 3
Telephone #: ( t 4 23 Z- b� Fax: (gZU) 2 3 2- L 11 I I Other Contact # or Email:
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): Owner U Representative U Tenant U Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required.):
Date: /-
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): flI ga -�eV4 Date:
Owner(s) Address: F0. 0 . s Cl�e 3 8O $ City: io d ej s� State: N zip: 5y9 3
Telephone #: dZp) 2 3 2 - T c l C Fax: (g2o) 23 Z - /I Other Contact # or Email:
Ownership Status (Please Check): U Individual U Trust U Partnership U Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the perfo of their fumctions, enter upon the
property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative
and may be postponed by the Planning ServiciA Division for incomplete submissions or other administra reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: 4
SITE INFORMATION
Date 1 - Z 1 � - . ( 0
Address/Location of Proposed Project: 136 05� o �� L Parcel No. 13 o7 37o 20o
Proposed Project Type: /'f ,pu r7 h. e ti // j � - e V e/ O p o, et 1
Current Use of Property: A CA y1 T zoo: 1\
Land Uses Surrounding Site: North:
South: �•d V r
East:
West: V 6lt 0414 f
"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request
➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at www.ei.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_I)evelopmenqlanning.htrn P) l �� I 10
Staff's' DateRec'd
NO
Brietly explain how the proposed conditional use/development plan will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
1. Health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. / / l ,
G P YO Df I'Cst ��°n fJD�I OC�Up�ilnL� t'it(l h°/ e 4i V �C �c�ON
p 1,e-l-weeh
�iS Pvc is IL 7 � + c tti at CC
dot 1�,� f -,I- P�
2. Pedestrian and vehicular cir culation and safety. g
tGf 4' t's jS �1YC:/�G Q� �
9 h c C mks
?cd' /'G('en� 7' A 14-, 1
�s Q(� ACekl 1J (.i ✓�
3. Noise, air, water, or other / forms L of er rv)ro n nmental pollution.
J�n ✓+"` w� N L,/�lI � TYeafrv� �er (.,' � �
YY /
�N2 1 �7�t1- �rnew a�eY �,�5.
e
4. The demand for and availabilijy of public ces and facilities.
SCwev 1- t,.�a r 2x,s ih a,!er, oe�, GrVC adder u•c [ljr 5' 1a
-K-r A-u-10PAe -,'
. Character and future develo of the area.
C 4 �� �•
70'i(C. 6 { .11vet., -Ae
.
Aleve V K t -1 1 4 41
A.1. ,,qei- UJPd 7 Sp i r`� •
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
ANARRATIVE of the proposed conditional use/Development Plan including:
• Existing and proposed use of the property
• Identification of all structures (including paving, signage, etc.) on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
❑ Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers
• Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the
nearest one - hundredth of an acre
• Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fumes, vibration, etc.
❑ Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area.
❑ Traffic generation (anticipated number of customers, deliveries, employee shift changes, etc.)
❑ Any other pertinent information to properly understand the intended uselplan and its relation to nearby properties and the
community as a whole
'd kc--"T
A complete SITE PLAN and BUILDING ELEVAT IONS must include:
❑ Two (2) full size (minimum 24" x 36') scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations
❑ Two (2) 8 %" x 11 (minimum) to 11" x 17" (maximum) reduction of the site plan and building elevations
❑ One compact disc or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the project in AutoCAD 2000 format with fonts and plot style
table file (if plans have been prepared digitally)
❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner and contact information of petitioner's
enginemWsurveyors/architects, or other design professionals used in the preparation of the plans
E3 The date of the original plan and revision dates, if applicable
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale.
❑ All property lines and existing and proposed right -of -way lines with dimensions clearly labeled
❑ All required setback and offset lines
❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives, signs, decks, patios,
fences, walls, etc.
• Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for scre
• Location and dimension of all on-site parking (and off -site parking provisions if they are to be employed), including a summary
of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30-36 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance
• Location and dimension of all loading and service areas
❑ Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a photometrics plan
❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e.
visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to; HVAC
equipment, electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators, etc.
DEERFIELD APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT PLAN NARRATIVE
The proposed development consists of the construction of six (6) two -story
apartment buildings of eight (8) units each along with associated parking garages,
parking lots, drives, and green space. The property is currently vacant. It is estimated
that approximately 75 people will occupy the 48 dwelling units on the site. Individual
units are between 800 and 900 square feet in size. There is 4,217 square feet of lot area
per dwelling unit which exceeds the 3,000 square foot minimum required by R -3 Zoning.
This is a residential development that will be professionally managed and
maintained and therefore noise, air, water and other environmental pollution will be
minimal. A large landscape buffer is proposed along the single family development to
the north, no buildings will be within 75 feet of the north property line. Street access
points will be at least 180 feet from any adjoining property lines and the streets can
accommodate the proposed traffic generated. The proposed use is compatible with
adjoining uses.
The following lot coverage is proposed:
Buildings 33,942 sq.ft. (0.78 ac) 16.8%
Paving 45,806 sq.ft. (1.05 ac) 22.6%
Green Space 122,678 sq.ft. (2.82 ac) 60.6%
Total 202,436 sq.ft. (4.65 ac) 100.0%
a
.-t
r
q�
6
g
n
0
IST a&,.° �PUw N ITS
$
q � I TEST 12TH AVE. ZONING: M3
SING (FAMILY I , 1k� _ tIMALVESCRXrnoN: that aartefl Sean
I . (7). lWb"(13) Ned ftxta b Uw
- N. ' .. 9 I 5lIAXIPWION al the Nmth tfa M of Se
14 }7T trady-an'an (27). T nN t fthu— (W)
n
�• 7haeeaah M are. CRT a( U11dm^
.n whndA+00
______ _ ...14 aw aiwc ery O CoMW, Vh WnSh W lsrNi Kay of Id"
I ���� �
Inooa � I I I .p' -� sa tOfA - 4.N7 AC
1d� �"R Mea°a PARCEL NO. 91307370MO
I I
tREES PROPERW AOORESS: UN OSBORN AVENUE
OMNERt RICHARD WEIR
A P
I 7 (MIT - I ° o al I ✓ sPACa Pa aaPrat 3o-3e OP aR ar
OsnROax N:IrrtarA� oOXe
MINI__�TORAGE — — • — _ m
Gwesa 5w Pie.Ieae de
sewda.d I"" the awes Pw.Nee sd
Pa.RA:91et SwmP,wtled e
44- 1 5 N a fft� • T.W awnsm in
Pat
1 a �1 1 3 I I I •,•�•••�' lOT A11G REalOa7rlAe UNIT .4
a. -a-r . a a • 21) aQ R. I I I
a V NDXNe O W EMQ .33,912 eF (ie.a %)
' 1 �, I MMSaa1TmVEAAQ . .s,a/as(t2 -a *1
i N ,M®asreaaer mMRC I ew . ,..- o OE. f 678 W E -».TSe
I �� t a... 7vilrsus 0as71 .12z a ax
r�sNE- a3dsP
I 4 a •d ,.� T0 ^
�j
lP
F- e� BUNDW6IXTORMATR]N
<Z !a• EL r \ OCILPANCY
QI p �7ja \ A. / ' APARREIRa: GROUP R-2
GAaABPt l 0 t coeh a.2(156h
V "MSIRUC"Op M^vUICAM"
MART. -M tYP9 V!(UNavPRaOaa ®)
/' aAaArt3s : TMen NnanNUaet ®>
m10 �.4 i � \ BUIIDWG NEIGHS
°� � d� .§ 4�� APA1XMaNra P stank itri•
OTAR0AM8!ft'
u CAR GARAGe(1awTh t7'
1 /
I f y d♦ /
Tarsmw
I T
' i aoR PA2s Ar /
n I �
, sOR Tats ,� O
I � �. g, / nF Ioe a aeNU.r .w er wa en .Twee
/ ltoT�
/ fC; twa +eieu�i,.s.t�v.t .rwm.
.I,ne.,,wreN �wawe ea�eawaa w aWewaa aaR
pV✓� � � taar wwNn ama- a-e�na .el wa .
� / huwe�wawaa• Rs� >�aw�at as SOltd nl fETT
/
Lagcnd
.; � '. /ice - s;`\ "� rc� \ /�• Q Q - Y,.1- r;.s. _...� (n)
el
\' '\
'kLS X-0wy1I .. «)
— 767
S ty •ova
" \ \
li M �1
�-7
V
-d .: ouzo 694 � u-
OD (D/"
issno
mno
�Z3
SWOHd 0 3SOdodd � SOdOad 71
! y
g \
wb\ u m
if C Z
pa \
ff
lINn 8 J.I 8 INn
QdQNd ;� Q.�S (IQlI� Q SQaO d
�N
PD- APARTMT DEV NW CORNER SISTERS OF THE SORROWFUL KOTSCHI ADOLF D
OSBORN AV & MASON ST MOTHER GENERALA 1303 KENSINGTON AVE
PC: 11 -16 -10 9056 N DEERBROOK TRL OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
MILWAUKEE WI 53223
RE 1145 DEVONSHIRE DR
DEHART CHRISTOPHER
STEINER ELIZABETH
1307 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
KOSMER JOHN F
1315 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
VILLARS KRISTINE S
1325 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
WOLLERSHEIM JEFFREY /TRINA
1335 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
PROUD WAYNE / KRISTINE S
1405 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
RUSCH THOMAS N
GABERT RICHARD
PO BOX 3808
OSHKOSH WI 54903 3808
RE 1180 OSBORN AV & VAC LOT
STINGLE CHAD M /KRISTINA
1230 DEVONSHIRE DR
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6235
SMITH CYNTHIA A
1345 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
SCHNEIDER DENNIS R /SHARON
1425 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
LENTZ SCOTT A /AMY M
1124 MASON ST
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6255
WIS DEPT OF MILITARY AFFRS
2400 WRIGHT ST
MADISON WI 53704
RE 1415 ARMORY PLC
SIEBER NANCY L
1355 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6244
ROBLEE MATTHEW T /SARA G
1435 KENSINGTON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6246
STREY CONSTRUCTION INC
5037 RIVERMOOR DR
OMRO WI 54963 9428
RE MASON ST VACANT LOT
VULCAN LANDS INC
1000 E WARRENVILLE RD 100
NAPERVILLE IL 60563 1444
RE 1301 KNAPP ST
1�
--- - - - -W-------------- -2TH------- - - - - -A
DISCLAIMER
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it Is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and Information located In various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It Is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh Is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepencies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - d ff
APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
NW CORNER OSBORN AV
& MASON ST
Scale: 1" = 150'
N OfHKOfH
ow n1e ware+
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
08/23/10
I r_
11L.)
N �
i i6 P I
I I
------------------------ - KE NS1 -N OTO . - -------------- VE .- - - -
AV
11
IR.
■ ` l �
l
111
OR .
11
U li
1 rl
.44 w 0111521
:1 111111 /.��C111T
DISCLAIMER
APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it Is not intended to be used as one.
N W CORNER O S B O R N AV N
Of HKOf H
This drawing is s a compilation of records, data
and information located In various city, county
sources affecting
&MASON ST
04 THE WATER
and state offices and other
the area shown and It is to be used for reference
City Of Oshkosh
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
Department Of
sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepencies are found, please contact the
Community Development
City of Oshkosh.
Scale. 1 11 = 200
0812311
Created by - dff