HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-280AUGUST 24, 2010 10 -280 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED LOST 0 -7 LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ADAPTIVE
REUSE OF A BUILDING TO CHANGE EXISTING TAVERN AT
351 ROSALIA STREET TO A CONFORMING USE AND PERMIT
EXPANSION OF THE USE TO CONSTRUCT A PATIO
INITIATED BY: DAVE KRUEGER, PETITIONER
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Found not to be consistent with Standards
set forth in Section 30 -11(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and denied
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a
conditional use permit is hereby granted under Section 30 -11 of the Oshkosh Zoning
Ordinance for the adaptive reuse of a building at 351 Rosalia Street to change the
existing tavern to a conforming use and permit expansion of the tavern to construct a
16' x 20' patio, per the attached, with the following conditions:
1) A minimum 6 foot tall solid fence be placed around any outdoor use on the site.
2) A year round vegetative screen be placed on all sides of the outdoor use.
3) Further expansion of the use requires a conditional use permit amendment
1 'HK 1 H
ON THE WATER
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Burichvj
Director of Planning Services
DATE: August 19, 2010
RE: Approve Conditional Use Permit for Adaptive Reuse of a Building to Change Existing Tavern
at 351 Rosalia Street to a Conforming Use and Permit Expansion of the Use to Construct a Patio
(Plan Commission Recommends Denial)
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a 0.18- acre /7,750 square foot parcel of land and is located at the southwest corner of
Rosalia Street & Winnebago Avenue. According to City records, the existing building was constructed in 1920
as a grocery store with upper floor housing and has been operated as a neighborhood tavern with upper floor
housing since the late 1940s -early 1950s. Records further indicate that the zoning has been R -2 since at least
1965, leading staff to believe the tavern use has been legal nonconforming for the last 45 years. In July, the
petitioner applied for a building permit to construct a patio on the south side of building but the permit request
was denied due to the property's nonconforming use status (expansions are not permitted to nonconforming
uses). In 2009, the City approved an Adaptive Reuse Ordinance to try to accommodate some of these
nonconforming use situations and as such a CUP is being requested to provide for construction of the proposed
patio.
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is requesting to make the historic and existing tavern use conforming as well as to provide the
ability for expansion of the use to include the construction of a 16 by 20 foot concrete patio enclosed by a 6 foot
tall wood privacy fence to be used as a smoking area. The property is currently used as a mixed -use
development (tavern on the ground floor and housing unit above), and is zoned residential. The Comprehensive
Plan's recommended land use is residential for this area however the approval of an adaptive reuse conditional
use for a tavern may not be in contrast to the residential designation as the Comprehensive Plan states that
neighborhood business districts should be considered in or near residential areas when providing goods and
services to residents of the surrounding area. The proposed conditional use permit, if approved, will not change
the essential character of the property from its historic use however an outdoor patio may have a negative impact
on surrounding residential uses. Staff is recommending that, if approved, the outdoor patio be screened with a
minimum of a 6 foot tall solid fence as well as a year -round vegetative screen with any further expansion of the
use requiring a conditional use permit amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT
01".1
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended denial of this request at its August 17, 2010 meeting.
Approved,
a4 �% .
City Manager
ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A
TAVERN LOCATED AT 351 ROSALIA STREET
Plan Commission meeting of August 17, 2010
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Woodchucks Bar and Grill, LLC
Owner: Spiegelberg Enterprises
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit approval for the adaptive reuse of a tavern at
their existing establishment located at 351 Rosalia Street.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The adaptive reuse of a structure /property is permitted only through the approval of a conditional
use permit within the R -2 Two - Family Residence Zoning District and is defined as follows:
"Adapting an existing building originally designed for an institutional, quasi - public, public or
other specific special purpose to a new use ". The Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria and
guidelines for the establishment of a Conditional Use Permit in Section 30 -11 (D).
Background Information Property Location and Type:
The subject property is a 0.18- acre /7,750 square foot parcel of land and is located at the southwest
corner of Rosalia Street & Winnebago Avenue, approximately 630 feet east of Washington
Elementary School and 1,225 feet west of The Waters Special Event Facility and Yacht Club.
According to City records, the existing building was constructed in 1920 as a grocery store with
upper floor housing and has been operated as a neighborhood tavern with upper floor housing
since the late 1940s -early 1950s. Records further indicate that the zoning has been R -2 since at
least 1965, leading staff to believe the tavern use has been legal nonconforming for the last 45
years. In July, the petitioner applied for a building permit to construct a patio on the south side of
building. The permit could not be issued as the addition of the patio is deemed an expansion of the
legal nonconforming tavern use thereby requiring the Conditional Use Permit.
Subiect Site
Existing Land Use
Zonin
Mixed -Use (Tavern with Upper Floor Housing)
I R -2
Adiacent Land Use and Zonine
Existing Uses
Zonin
North
Single and two-Family Residential
R -2
South
Single and two - Family Residential
R -2
East
Single and two - Family Residential
R -2
West
Single and two-Family Residential
R -2
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation
Land Use
10 Year Land Use Recommendation
Residential
20 Year Land Use Recommendation
Residential
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is requesting an Adaptive Reuse Conditional Use Permit to make the historic and
existing tavern use conforming as well as to provide the ability for expansion of the use. The site
plan submitted with the application indicates the expansion to include the construction of a 16 foot
by 20 foot (320 square foot) concrete patio, enclosed by a 6 foot tall wood privacy fence, to
primarily be used as a "smoking patio ". In the application, the petitioner states that the patio will
provide a screened and controlled area for customers use as opposed to the current use of the
public sidewalk.
In terms of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the property is currently used as a mixed -use
development (tavern on the ground floor — housing unit above), is zoned residential and the
recommended 10 and 20 year land use plan maps identify this area as appropriate for residential
land use. The approval of an adaptive reuse conditional use for a tavern would appear to be in
contrast to the residential designation however this may not be the case as the Comprehensive Plan
states:
"Neighborhood business districts should be considered in or near residential areas and
developed in scale with surrounding development and be pedestrian accessible.
Neighborhood business districts provide goods and services to residents of the
surrounding area, generally within 5- minute driving time or 10 to 15- minute walk and
include uses such as food, drugs, hardware, clothing & sundries, and personal service
establishments. Smaller scale commercial areas are not identified on the land use maps;
however, future areas will be evaluated as they are proposed near residential areas "
(Page 52, City of Oshkosh Comprehensive Plan, 2005- 2025).
Overall, the proposed Adaptive Reuse Conditional Use will not change the essential character of
the property from its historic use. However, the addition of an outdoor patio or "smoking patio"
may have a negative impact on surrounding residential uses such as lights and noise. Therefore
staff suggests that if approved, the Adaptive Reuse Conditional Use be conditioned on the
screening of any outdoor use with a minimum of a 6 foot tall solid fence to visually block the use
as well as a year -round vegetative screen, such as a row of arborvitae or a hedge wall, on all sides
of the outdoor use to help reduce any noise impacts. Additionally, because of the sensitive nature
of the business, it is recommended that any further expansion of the use receive Common Council
approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit.
RECOMMENDATION /CONDITIONS
Staff recommends a finding that the proposed conditional use permit request is consistent with
Sections 30 -11(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and be approved with the following conditions:
1) A minimum of a 6 foot tall solid fence is placed around any outdoor use of the site.
2) A year -round vegetative screen is placed on all sides of the outdoor use.
3) Further expansion of the use requires Conditional Use Permit amendment.
Item - 351 Rosalia CUP Tavern
The Plan Commission denied the conditional use permit with conditions noted. The following is
the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Mr. Buck presented the item and explained the definition of adaptive reuse of a structure /property.
He reviewed the site and surrounding area, the existing zoning and land uses in said area, and the
history of the subject site. He stated that the neighborhood tavern has been a legal nonconforming
use for the past 45 years and explained that the request to expand on the nonconforming use was to
make the existing tavern use conforming and allow for an addition of an outdoor concrete patio
enclosed by a 6 foot tall fence primarily to be used as a "smoking patio ". He reviewed photos of
the site and the proposed site plan and discussed its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. He
also reviewed the conditions recommended for this request and stated that he had received several
calls from concerned neighbors regarding this proposal. He reviewed an email that was distributed
to Commission members from Kim Hoeper, 372 Rosalia Street, voicing her concerns regarding
this request as it would create additional noise from patrons outside the tavern which she feels is
already an issue with talking loudly and using foul language late in the evening. He also received
a phone call from Susan Jones, who owns both the property at 346 Rosalia Street and 1339
Winnebago Avenue and has resided in this neighborhood for 33 years. She also had concerns with
noise issues from the tavern and did not feel this use should be allowed to expand as it would
negatively impact the residential property values in this area.
Mr. Hinz questioned if the City had local ordinances regulating outdoor consumption of alcohol
and if this request was approved, if it would be setting a precedent with these situations.
Mr. Buck responded that the liquor license for the establishment would have to be amended to
allow for the consumption of alcohol outside of the tavern.
Mr. Burich added that each situation would have to be considered on a separate basis as
circumstances could differ from one location to another and in some cases could create a negative
impact on neighboring properties which is why these are being considered through CUP.
Mr. Palmeri commented that there were quite a few neighborhood taverns in Oshkosh and
questioned if any other establishments have these types of outdoor patios.
Mr. Burich replied that there are several other taverns in Oshkosh with outdoor patios although he
could not quote an exact number of how many were currently in existence and what there zoning
status was.
Mr. Palmeri inquired if staff believed that the approval of this expansion of a nonconforming use
would negatively affect property values in this neighborhood.
Mr. Buck responded that the tavern use already existed in the neighborhood and he did not feel
that the addition of an outdoor smoking patio would be that significant as patrons were already
outside and the location of an established area would be enclosed with screening in place to help
alleviate noise issues.
Mr. Monte questioned if the City enforces a noise ordinance which would provide other avenues
for residents if noise issues got out of hand.
Item - 351 Rosalia CUP Tavern
Mr. Burich responded that it did and he believed the ordinance was in effect at 10:00 pm.
Mr. Nollenberger commented that with the smoking ban in effect, patrons were required to go
outside to smoke and he could not think of any alternatives at this time to alleviate the issues with
noise that this situation creates.
Mr. Burich commented that going outside in the yard or on the sidewalk was the only alternatives
and the request today was to create a designated area for this purpose.
Mr. Hinz questioned if music would be broadcast outdoors to the patio area.
Mr. Buck replied that the petitioner stated in their application that the patio was for smoking
purposes only and did not indicate that it would include music or other activities.
Mr. Hinz then inquired if a condition could be added to the request to not permit outdoor music to
alleviate concerns of noise from the neighboring residential property owners.
Mr. Burich responded that a condition could be added to the request to address this issue as
amplified music probably would not be acceptable in this location.
Mr. Hinz also inquired if a roof would be installed on the patio structure.
Mr. Buck replied that a roof was not proposed for the patio at this time however the adaptive reuse
conditional use permit, if approved, would allow for other additions in the future with approval of
an amendment to the CUP.
Mr. Borsuk questioned if the request was to approve the use of the smoking patio only.
Mr. Buck responded that the tavern was a legal nonconforming use so it would be permitted to
continue operating in this residential district regardless of the approval of the conditional use
permit.
Mr. Borsuk then questioned if the CUP amendment for future expansion or improvements would
provide added protection for future modifications or other improvements on the site.
Mr. Burich replied that it would and added that a condition could be included with the current
request that no alcohol or food be allowed on the outdoor patio if Commissioners felt it would be
appropriate.
Mr. Borsuk also inquired if patios are allowed at other taverns that are a conforming use.
Mr. Burich responded that outdoor patios would be allowed if the tavern has the appropriate
zoning classification for such use and if they have adequate space to meet the necessary setbacks
for such structures.
Sue Ertmer, 348 Rosalia Street, stated that she would like to thank the staff of the Planning
Services division for their assistance in this matter and commented that the noise issue was her
primary concern. She further stated that she has lived at this location since 1966 and has seen
item - 351 Rosaiia CUP Tavern
numerous taverns come and go at this location, some good and some bad. When the windows are
open, noise is an issue with the existing use as well as patrons using foul language outside of the
tavern. She voiced her concerns that a large outdoor patio will intensify the current situation and
stated that she was not adverse to Woodchuck's, however this was a family area and she felt that
the outdoor patio use could create more problems. She also commented that she has experienced
issues with tavern patrons parking across her driveway access and numerous cars parked on the
street due to the fact that the bar has no off - street parking area. Trash in the street was also a
concern and she felt that other taverns may have outdoor areas for patrons; however they were not
located in an area that was as residential as this one.
John Segura, 1225 Winnebago Avenue, stated that the application indicated that this outdoor patio
would be used primarily as a smoking area and questioned what other things it would be used for
once established. He further stated that he did not agree that the addition of this outdoor area
would not have a negative affect on the surrounding properties or that the use will not change the
area. He lives next door to the tavern and the proposed patio would come very close to his deck
and bedroom. He felt that alcohol would be taken outside and patrons would congregate in this
area all night.
Mr. Borsuk asked if someone from Woodchuck's Bar had contacted him to discuss this proposal.
Mr. Segura responded that he did not have any contact from the petitioner and that the only thing
he received was the meeting notice from the City.
Kathryn Larson, 1935 Doemel Street, stated that she was there on behalf of an acquaintance that
lived near the tavern. She commented that she has experienced problems getting in and out of the
driveway due to the numerous cars parking on the street. She did not feel that the nonconforming
use should be allowed to be expanded as it only exists on this site from a historical standpoint and
this proposed expansion would have a huge impact on residential neighbors. She felt that the
nonconforming use should remain as is and commented that there were noise issues currently and
that hedges will not be sufficient to address the matter.
Mary Louise Lewis, 1350 Winnebago Avenue, stated that she has lived at this residence for 50
years and there has always been a tavern at this location. Her home is located between
Woodchuck's Bar and The Waters which both have patrons frequenting their establishments
however events at The Waters are occasional as compared to the tavern use which is every night.
She commented that they leave the doors open and the noise can be heard at her home a half a
block away. She has experienced noise issues with other establishments such as the Boat Yard and
has contacted police with no response. She was concerned with the proposed outdoor use as she
felt that when patrons are consuming alcohol there will be noise associated with it and does not
want to see this request approved.
Catherine Lindsay, 368 Rosalia Street, stated that since the smoking ban went into effect, there
was more noise associated with the tavern use and at times it was still going on after 2:00 am. She
voiced her concerns that the noise will be increased with an outdoor patio and expressed her
empathy with direct neighbors to the tavern for both noise and smoke fumes from the patrons. She
also stated that she realized that the tavern was a neighborhood tradition; however the behavior of
the current patrons was an issue.
Item - 351 Rosalia CUP Tavern
David Peterson, 1217 Winnebago Avenue, stated that he had experienced minor problems with the
tavern use such as the parking issues and noise mentioned previously, however he did not feel that
the addition of an outdoor smoking area would be a good fit. He commented that the Varsity Club
has an outdoor area at its establishment and it can get rather loud and vulgar at times. He felt that
the outdoor patio would encourage patrons to remain outdoors which would not be good for the
residential properties in the area.
Patricia Segura, 1225 Winnebago Avenue, stated that she wished to present a letter from Allen and
Jennifer Newell, 336 Rosalia Street, and a petition signed by five neighboring properties, both
objecting to the proposed outdoor patio. Both the letter and petition brought up previously heard
concerns regarding excessive noise, trash, and foul language all with the anticipation that these
issues will be more prevalent with patrons in an outdoor patio area.
Sherry Krueger, Woodchuck's Bar and Grill, 351 Rosalia Street, stated that they were attempting
to get patrons off of the street and into the yard with their proposal for an outdoor patio. Currently
patrons are out on the sidewalk and they feel that it would be less disturbing to neighbors to have
them located in the backyard of the tavern. She further commented that they do not serve food
after 10:00 pm and there was no intention of food or music to be permitted outside. The outdoor
patio was for smoking purposes only.
Mr. Fojtik inquired if they met with neighbors regarding their request prior to today's meeting.
Ms. Krueger responded that they did not have a formal meeting but they did speak with any
neighbors that stopped in the tavern about the request.
Mr. Hinz questioned if a roof would be planned for the patio.
Ms. Krueger replied that City staff told them that they could not include a roof on the patio and
that they desired to create more of a shelter -type of structure initially.
Mr. Burich stated that the shelter -type structure may not meet the intent of the new smoking rules
and may also have building codes issues.
Mr. Buck added that the regulations regarding the types of structures that could still permit
smoking were maintained by the State and that from a zoning standpoint, required setbacks had to
be satisfied.
Ms. Krueger commented that the Site Plan Review Committee suggested the outdoor patio and
that they were told at that meeting that the zoning of the property was the issue.
Ms. Ertmer questioned if serving alcohol outside would be an issue.
Ms. Krueger stated that they were told that patrons would be allowed to take drinks outside if they
created an enclosed area for this purpose.
Ms. Propp stated that she felt the outdoor use was unacceptable particularly for the residents at
1225 Winnebago Avenue which would be directly adjacent to the patio area.
Item - 351 Rosalia — CUP Tavern
Mr. Monte agreed and commented that the smoking ban was implemented for health reasons and
placing a patio with smokers 10 -20 feet from the residence next door contradicts what the smoking
ban was meant to prevent.
Mr. Borsuk commented that he would not be supporting this request as he would like to see how
we address the legal nonconforming issue as the adaptive reuse conditional use permit opens up
the ability for the site to expand its current use.
Mr. Burich stated that the conditions recommended for this request would require the petitioner to
come back through the Plan Commission and Common Council process for any future expansion
of the use on the site.
Mr. Hinz stated that his family has owned a tavern in a residential neighborhood for many years
and some of the concerns brought up by neighbors would be addressed by the creation of the
outdoor patio such as trash and patrons standing on the street. He further stated that the business
owner is trying to stay in business and keep customers off the street and he feels we will see more
of these types of requests with local taverns. He understands the concerns with the neighbor at
1225 Winnebago Avenue due to their close proximity to the proposed outdoor patio, however it
appears that only a quarter of the residents in the neighborhood have complained about the request
so the remaining residents apparently see the situation differently. He wants to support the
business owner's rights and their request for the patio and proposed that a condition could be
added that no music or alcohol be permitted outside if that would make the request more
acceptable.
Mr. Palmeri stated that he contacted the Police Department regarding Woodchuck's reputation in
the community and found that noise was the most prominent issue with the tavern. He found it
difficult to believe that the outdoor patio would create a better situation as far as noise complaints
and although the intentions of the petitioner are understandable, he would not support this request.
Mr. Monte commented that he smokes himself and understands the issue, however to place an
outdoor smoking patio 10 to 15 feet from a residence is not appropriate.
Mr. Fojtik stated that he anticipates we will see more proposals of this type in the future and it
appeared that most of the neighbors in the surrounding area are against this request. He also
commented that he appreciated the appropriate behavior at the meeting as some of these issues can
result in some heated discussion.
Mr. Hinz stated that the location of the patio seemed to be an issue and suggested that the item be
laid over to the next Plan Commission meeting to give the petitioner time to possibly relocate the
patio to an area that would be less objectionable.
Mr. Burich responded that it could provide time for the petitioner and neighbors to discuss the
issue and possibly find an acceptable alternative.
Mr. Borsuk commented that the item would still be going before the Common Council so there
would be an opportunity to address a change in the site plan at that level.
Item - 351 Rosalia CUP Tavern
Motion by Nollenberger to deny the conditional use permit for the adaptive reuse of a
tavern located at 351 Rosalia Street with the following conditions:
1) A minimum of a 6 foot tall solid fence is placed around any outdoor use of the site.
2) A year -round vegetative screen is placed on all sides of the outdoor use.
3) Further expansion of the use requires Conditional Use Permit amendment.
Seconded by Monte. Motion carried 6 -1. ( Ayes- Borsuk/Fojtik/Palmeri/Propp /Monte/
Nollenberger. Nays- Hinz.)
Item - 351 Rosalia CUP Tavern
City of Oshkosh Application
❑ Planned Development Review
0_ HKQIH Conditional Use Permit Review
ON THE WATER
* *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK **
SUBMIT TO:
Dept. of Community Development
215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130
PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
Date: ' 3 _10
Petitioner's Address: 1 Kj}ui la S y t ,) City: US h Kb State: - -y Zr�ip: ,�} -96
Telephone #: (�z� Fax: ( ) Other Contact # or Email q) �� q93 7
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): ❑
Petitioner's Signature (required):
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s):
❑ Representative X Tenant ❑ Prospective Buyer
Owner(s) Address:
Telephone #: (q)_D) Fax:
Date: 7 ' )Ir" I d
Date: ,! 0
City: State Zip: Q
Ownership Status (Please Check): ❑ Individual ❑ Trust ❑ Partnership ❑ Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I /We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the
property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative
and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature:
SITE INFORMATION
U.r,a Date \ \1D
Address /Location of Proposed Project:
Parcel No.
Proposed Project Type:
to i 10 - i b /` � YQ 4
% ✓e�,� : �2� 1 L
C; �� i ✓Q � .
Current Use of Property: k (j In ��� ] Zoning: & s I
Land Uses Surrounding Site: North:
South:
East:
West:
4-( a,
"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request.
➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
s Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at N,,ww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/ Community _Development /Planning.htm �� +
Staff Date Rec Y
d yd 10
Other Contact # or Email:
r�
Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use /development plan will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
1. Health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
W51oMer5 w'► I t be i h area, '1r)51nd o- 5 i dcu)t 1 k
2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety.
Same a,(5 0_&
3. Noise, air, water, or other forms of environmental pollution.
w i l l be i a- coi 6 f l ed xreo. i 0 d of vii -4f eC f
4. The demand for and availability of public services and facilities.
t,4I/�-
5. Character and future development of the area.
16 '?c&bwdl be W� a- wdl de,51 i:�00_t
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
➢ A NARRATIVE of the proposed conditional use/Development Plan including:
❑ Existing and proposed use of the property
❑ Identification of all structures (including paving, signage, etc.) on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
❑ Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers
❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the
nearest one - hundredth of an acre
❑ Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fumes, vibration, etc.
❑ Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area.
❑ Traffic generation (anticipated number of customers, deliveries, employee shift changes, etc.)
❑ Any other pertinent information to properly understand the intended use /plan and its relation to nearby properties and the
community as a whole
A complete SITE PLAN and BUILDING ELEVATIONS must include:
❑ Two (2) full size (minimum 24" x 36 ") scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations
❑ Two (2) 8 '' /z" x 11 (minimum) to 11" x 17" (maximum) reduction of the site plan and building elevations
❑ One compact disc or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the project in AutoCAD 2000 format with fonts and plot style
table file (if plans have been prepared digitally)
• Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner and contact information of petitioner's
engineers /surveyors /architects, or other design professionals used in the preparation of the plans
• The date of the original plan and revision dates, if applicable
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale.
❑ All property lines and existing and proposed right -of -way lines with dimensions clearly labeled
❑ All required setback and offset lines
❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives, signs, decks, patios,
fences, walls, etc.
❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for screening
❑ Location and dimension of all on -site parking (and off -site parking provisions if they are to be employed), including a summary
of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30 -36 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance
• Location and dimension of all loading and service areas
• Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the including a photometrics plan
❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e.
visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to; HVAC
equipment, electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators, etc.
J0
i�
ENCLOSED OUTDOOR PATIO
351 ROSALIA ST
PC: 08 -17 -10
STUPEY MICHAEL P /HOLLY
352 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901 5366
ERTMER SUSAN T
348 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901 5366
KOEHN MICHAEL S /STACEY
344 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
DAUGHERTY BRIAN P
360 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
SPIEGELBERG ENTERPRISES
934 S WESTFIELD ST
OSHKOSH WI 54902 6141
RE 351 ROSALIA ST
JONES DEVON E /SUSAN K
1339 WINNEBAGO AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54901 5334
RE 346 ROSALIA ST
MOON JOHN H
77 JOHNSON AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902 7377
RE 1226 WINNEBAGO AV
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
7105 CORPORATE DR
PLANO TX 75024
RE 359 ROSALIA ST
MELCHIORS PATRICIA S
1225 WINNEBAGO AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54901 5332
HUHN ANGELA
341 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901 5364
RE 345 ROSALIA ST
WOODCHUCKS BAR & GRILL
ATTN DAVE KRUEGER
351 ROSALIA ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
la
A
r
;� l J
A IL
US
i nlll Ill
ME
ads u7
_ ■■■ _ i
IMP
It
Emu,
i
; Cis ;
.� L14A
*11111m
L am ,
11111
Ago
, � , �►�rliii ��u�IlI1/U�i� �1
�li��
St at�1r�1:1'llll/t
111
I 4 �k {■till
1 4 Alb Ig
� X0 1
J�
�� J
DISCLAIMER ENCLOSED ( 0 0?N
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it Is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and s tate offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
OUTDOOR PATIO
351 ROSALIA ST
Scale: 1" = 50'
N OfHK 1H
oN THE WATER
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
08/04/10
5