Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Certificate of Occupancy - 07/13/2010
CITY HALL Inspection Services Div 215 Church Avenue City of Oshkosh 0 PO Box 1130 Oshkosh WI 461Fr 54903 -1130 OJHKOJH ON THE WATER Approved: 07/06/2010 Reissued: 07/13/2010 524 N Koeller St LLC 230 Ohio St, Suite 200 Oshkosh WI 54902 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY An Occupancy Permit is hereby issued for the new office of Schenck Technology located at 520 N Koeller St, Oshkosh WI as described in Building Permit #138434. This building shall be used for a Business Office and is located in the C -2 General Commercial District. LIMITATIONS: Maximum number of persons: Per State Approved Plan Certificate of Occupancy shall be required prior to occupancy, should additional building(s) be erected, or should any buildings mentioned above be altered or moved. The use of land, or buildings, shall not be changed until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for that occupancy. All conditions noted above must be complied with in order for this certificate to be valid. ..� ����� C'.t9f). Building Systems Inspector cc: Cumings Electric O'Neill Enterprises Building Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 0138434 Create Date 10/5/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor OWNER Category 221 - New Offices, Banks, Professional Plan J5- 2764 -0809 Occupany Permit Required Flood Plain Height Permit Class of Const: Use /Nature COMM/ 520 N Koeller St/ Interior Build Out (Schenck) *This permit is for the interior build out for the north unit in the new office of Work building. State Approved plans for Koller Street III office builidng. HVAC Contr Plumbing Contr Electric Contr Inspections: Date 7/6/2010 Type %K - 64..#r'.— Inspector Nicole Krahn approved Date/Time requested: 7/6/2010 12:55 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 7/6/2010 12:55 PM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Page 2 of 2 Building Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 0138434 Create Date 10/5/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor OWNER Category 221 - New Offices, Banks, Professional Plan J5 -2764 -0809 Occupany Permit Required Flood Plain Height Permit Class of Const: Use /Nature COMM/ 520 N Koeller St/ Interior Build Out (Schenck) This permit is for the interior build out for the north unit in the new office of Work building. State Approved plans for Koller Street III office builidng. HVAC Contr Plumbing Contr Electric Contr Inspections: Date 10/9/2009 Type Rough In Inspector Nicole Krahn approved w /cond. 1) Seal the metallic cable through the top plate in the file storage room. A 1 -hr system is required. (This will be inspected at the insulation inspection). I inform Mr. Walters that the pex plumbing line needed to be moved on the center division wall. This wall will need to be drywalled to the top plate. Date/Time requested: 10/9/2009 12:59 PM Notice Type: FC Ready Date/Time: 10/9/2009 12:59 PM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date Type Reinspect Inspector Nicole Krahn REQUEST LINE / READY FOR A REINSPECTION Date/Time requested: 11/24/2006 03:16 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/24/2009 03:16 PM Access: DOORS ARE OPEN AFTER 7:OOAM Requested By: BOB WALTER Phone Number: (920) 379 -1111 O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/19/2009 : Type Final Inspector Nicole Krahn not approved Date/Time requested: 11/19/2009 12:53 PM Notice Type: FC Ready Date/Time: 11/19/2009 12:53 PM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/24/2009 : Type Re Final Inspector Nicole Krahn approved w /cond. TOP ISSUED Date/Time requested: 11/24/2009 12:54 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/24/2009 12:54 PM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Page 1 of 2 Electric Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 138274 Create Date 9/24/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC Service 0 New 0 Change° Temp • N/A 1 Type 0 Overhead 0 Underground • N/A Volts Circuits Luminaires Amps - Switches Receptacles Value $25,000.00 Use /Nature (Commercial Office wiring for the north 1/2 of the building of Work Inspections: Date 10/06/2009 Type Rough In Inspector Kevin Benner approved REQUEST LINE / READY FOR A ROUGH INSPECTION Reviewed with Bob Walters from the developer Date/Time requested: 10/02/2009 09 :09 AM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 10/06/2009 00:00 Access: Requested by: VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC - Rob Phone Number: (920) 428 -4160 O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Wavied ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/06/2009 Type Abv Ceiling Inspector Kevin Benner approved w /cond. Request line Need support for the master -slave troffer cables, open wiring in the bathrooms for exhaust fans, emergency illumination was not on the 'local lighting circiuits. Reviewed with the electrician on site. Date/Time requested: 11/05/2009 12:32 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/06/2009 : Access: Requested by: VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC - Rob Phone Number: 920 - 428 -4160 _ O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Wavied ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/19/2009 Type Final Inspector Kevin Benner not approved Request line / ready late Wed 11/18 or early Thurs 11/19 Correct the gas and water bonding, GFCI for refrigerator receptacle in the break room,multi -wire branch circuits to be on one breaker, water heater and condensing units were not installed. Called Rob while on site. Also discussed the lack of LV permits and inspection with Bob from Dumkes and Faith Tech while on site. Date/Time requested: 11/17/2009 06:11 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/18/2009 _ : PM Requested by: VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC - Rob Phone Number: 920 - 428 -4160 O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Wavied ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/20/2009 Type Re Final Inspector Kevin Benner approved w /cond. REQUEST LINE / READY FORA FINAL REINSPECTION (500 N KOELLER) Condensing units were not installed and correct labeling with addresses shall be installed for the service disconnects. Caliled Rob while on site. LV inspections were not conducted or reques ted. Date/Time requested: 11/19/2009 01:01 PM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/20/2009 00:00 AM Access: Requested by: VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC - Rob Phone Number: (920) 428 -4160 O Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Wavied ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Electric Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 138274 Create Date 9/24/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC Service 0 New 0 Change 0 Temp • N/A J Type 0 Overhead 0 Underground • N /A Volts Circuits Luminaires Amps Switches Receptacles Value $25,000.00 Use /Nature (Commercial Office wiring for the north 1/2 of the building of Work Inspections: Date 03/30/2010 Type Underground Inspector Kevin Benner approved w /cond. Called Rob while on site to discuss the route of the existing portion of the raceways to be sure that we have not exceeded 360 deg. of bends Date/Time requested: 03/30/2010 07:58 AM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 03/30/2010 00:00 PM Access: Requested by: VAN OFFEREN ELECTRIC LLC - Rob Phone Number: (920) 428 -4160 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Wavied ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid HVAC Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 138352 Create Date 09/30/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor CONDON TOTAL COMFORT Fuel if Gas 1 Oil Electric U Solar U Solid Value $39,898.00 System 0 New ❑ Replace ❑ Other Li] Forced Air u Radiant u Steam u A/C u Vent Li Electric u Hot Water U Suppl. u Con. Burner Chimney Type 0 Chimney A 0 Chimney B 0 Direct Vent 9 Not Applicable Use /Nature COMM/ Hvac for New Office Building. of Work Inspections: Date 11/19/2009 Type Final Inspector Nicole Krahn not approved Date/Time requested: 11/19/2009 08:28 AM Notice Type: FC Ready Date/Time: 11/19/2009 08:28 AM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/24/2009 Type Final Inspector Nicole Krahn approved Date/Time requested: 11/24/2009 08:28 AM Notice Type: Ready Date/Time: 11/24/2009 08:28 AM Access: Requested By: Phone Number: 0 Reinspect Fee ❑ Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Plumbing Permit Work Card Job Address 500 -520 N KOELLER ST Permit Number 137860 Create Date 08/28/2009 Owner DUMKE AND ASSOCIATES LLC Contractor O'NEILL ENTERPRISES INC Category 412 - Res - Interior (New /Relocated Fixtures) Plan FL- 384 - 0410 -P Value $5,400.00 Bathtub Clothes Wshr Classrm Sink Surgeons Sink Roof Drain Deduct Meters Shower Lndry Tray 1 Exam Sink Sterilizer Soda Disp Wtr Sewer Mtrs Whirlpool Sump Pump F Prep Sink RPZ Valve Coffee Maker Wtr Usage Mtrs Lavatory 2 San Sump /Pump Flr/Wst Sink Bidet Site Drain Misc. Toilet 2 Water Softner Hand Sink Urinal Wait. St. Fixtures Kit Sink Standp Rec Lab Sink Beer Tap Ice Chest Disposal Gar Drain Plaster Sink Dip Well Comm Ice Maker Dishwasher Local Waste Sculry Sink Drink Ftn Int Grease Trap Floor Drain 3 Bar Sink Sery Sink Wash Ftn Ext Grease Trap Hose Bibb 2 Breakrm Sink 1 Shamp Sink Catch Basin Eye Wash Statn Water Heater 1 Use /Nature Interior plumbing for new office building. A water calc sheet is required to be submitted prior to rough inspection. of Work Size Material Type # Conn.Type Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Water Service Inspections for Work Card 106221 Date 8/28/2009 Type Underground Inspector Paul Wolf approved w /cond. "A" value is 34 for water distribution. UG was not completed, no violations noted. Date/Time requested: 8/28/2009 09:49 AM Notice Type: FC Telephone Number: Access: Ready Date/Time: 8/28/2009 09:49 AM Requested By: O'NEILL ENTERPRISES INC 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 9/28/2009 Type Rough In Inspector Paul Wolf approved w /cond. E -mail request. Water calcs are required to be submitted, emailed O'Neill's. Date/Time requested: 9/24/2009 03:24 PM Notice Type: Telephone Number: 230 -2007 Access: Open Ready Date/Time: 9/25/2009 : Requested By: O'NEILL ENTERPRISES INC - Joyce 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date Type Water Inspector Paul Wolf approved E -mail request/A" value is 31 for water distribution. Date/Time requested: 10/5/2009 02:24 PM Notice Type: Telephone Number: 920 - 296 -0014 Access: Open Ready Date/Time: 10/7/2009 : Requested By: O'NEILL ENTERPRISES INC - Robert Abel 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid Date 11/23/2009 Type Final Inspector Paul Wolf approved w /cond. Called Pat and went over added fixtures and plan review requirements per 82.20. Issued a new permit for additional work and noted plan review note. Date/Time requested: 11/23/200407:41 AM Notice Type: FC Telephone Number: Access: Ready Date/Time: 11/23/2004 07:41 AM Requested By: O'NEILL ENTERPRISES INC 0 Reinspect Fee 0 Fee Waived ❑ Reinspect Fee Paid City of Oshkosh Division of Inspection Services 215 Church Avenue PO Box 1130 Oshkosh W H O H ffice 920-236-5050 20- ffi ON THE WATER Fax 920-236 -5084 Temporary Occupancy Permit Application Address for the Requested Temporary Occupancy Permit: S� 1`.31 . 6p'Z_A-A-5 � - Occupancy or Use of Structure: - .� ' f�► x �c -�+' 1 Vr,J t �33V Building Permit Number: L 3 3 Issue Date: �i 1 c j Applicant Information Name: by nn eS2 1�.Sae`,i.ef Company Name: 91 4n9 Mailing Address: 2 z /j,Q o St;„ [4 2nc3 Phone Number: X36 Fax Number: 236 -6 Vg 5 As (check all that apply) y the owner, the General Contractor, the Building Permit Applicant, the agent for the owner, I hereby request approval for a Temporary Occupancy Permit at the aforementioned address. Temporary Occupancy is requested from 11- 24-K(date) through - 3 - Dot (date.) I agree to abide by any Conditions of Approval. I understand that Final Occupancy Approval or a Temporary Occupancy Permit Extension must be secured by the Temporary Occupancy Permit expiration date or I may be subject to Municipal Citation issuance for each day the structure is occupied without the required Occupancy Permit. (Applicant Signature) (date) (Office Use Only) Application Status: Approved Denied Expiration Date: Fee Collected Comments /Conditions of Approval: c O ti`t s Q Lk -►k.a. 1 3 4 l r `� 1 L �- CJJN11.62t■_ (hex dociect 't 1 iy1 . PtY-,o O� , .na3 e l�� - �� 1G v►�p�- c�,:,�n� �.pQ�.1�S 44-I (tau) v0 ►,r ( 4 A . Reviewing Inspector: LD\C: Date: /a4-J0) 01/26/2010 TUE 8:58 FAX 2002/002 BUILDINGS, HVAC, COMPLIANCE STATEMENT SBD -9720 This form is required to be submitted by the supervising professional (architect, engineer, HVAC designer or electrical designer) observing construction of projects within buildings with total areas 50,000 cubic feet or greater and bleachers (Comm 61.40). Failure to submit this form may result in penalties as specified in Comm 61.23 and /or local ordinances. This form must be submitted prior to the plan approval expiration date or another submittal may be required. General Instructions: Prior to the initial occupancy of new buildings or additions and the final occupancy of altered existing buildings, submit this completed and signed form to: • The municipal building inspection office (refer to the plan approval letter for agency address) and • Safety and Buildings, 10541N Ranch Road Hayward, WI. 54843 Note: If the review was done by the municipality, the compliance statement goes only to the municipal building inspector. A copy is not needed by Safety & Buildings. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1)(m)). 1. PROJECT INFORMATION: Please fill in the following with information from your plan approval letter. _,,� Transaction ID Number 4o ld Project Name A�� 1� a"' Site Number ___6/Z /Pep 5OO Site location (number & street) _ _029 c%eCG,Z-___ ,1./ 1" Af City ❑ Village ❑ Town of���� County of Z�,04 2. PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT: (Check Box A, B, C, or D to indicate purpose and complete any other applicable boxes and information. Attach additional pages if necessary.) Check those which apply: ,'Building Object ID # ��� ❑ HVAC Object ID # ❑ Lighting Object ID # ❑ Partial Completion Description of Portion Completed A) g Statement of Substantial Compliance To the best of my knowledge, belief, and based on onsite observation, construction of the following building and /or HVAC items applicable to this project have been completed in substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications. % BUILDING /LIGHTING ITEMS 1. Structural system including submittal and erection of all building components 10. Exterior lighting & control requirements (trusses. precast, metal building, etc.) 11. Interior lighting & control requirements 2. Fire protection systems (sprinklers, alarms, smoke detectors) designed, installed, 12. All conditions of lighting plan approval and tested (Including forward flow on back flow devices) by appropriately and applicable variances registered professionals 3. Shaft and stairway enclosure 4. Exits including exit and directional lights 5. Fire- resistive construction, enclosure of hazards, fire walls, labeled doors, class ❑ HVAC ITEMS of construction, fire stopped penetrations 6. Sanitation system (toilets, sinks, drinking facilities) 1. HVAC system including final test 7. Barrier -free including Comm 18 elevators and lifts 2. All conditions of HVAC plan approval and 8. Energy envelope requirements applicable variances 9. All conditions of building plan approval and applicable variances The following items are not in compliance and must be addressed: , 4. AI &.r B} CI Statement of Noncompliance ,8/ /jIY6,�O v/!d f/4f"s�/ ,r • .t , p Due to the following listed violations, this project is not ready for occupancy: C) ❑ Supervising Professional Withdrawn From Project (Use A or B above to indicate project status as of this date.) D) ❑ Project Abandoned 1 SUPERVISING PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE FOR: ix Building ❑ HVAC ❑ Lighting__ _1�` .�� Date _�l,P Na e (please rint or type) Phone number 7 ,;j _ Q.Bd ¢ g �.� 1� Custo ID # Si natur• -�•••■• S8I) - 9720 (R.0712008) S80-9720 (8.02/2004) 11/19/2009 THU 13:21 FAX Ia1002/002 BUILDINGS, HVAC, COMPLIANCE STATEMENT SBD -9720 This form is required to be submitted by the supervising professional (architect, engineer, HVAC designer or electrical designer) observing construction of projects within buildings with total areas 50,000 cubic feet or greater and bleachers (Comm 61.40). Failure to submit this form may result in penalties as specified in Comm 61.23 and /or local ordinances. This form must be submitted prior to the plan approval expiration date or another submittal may be required. General Instructions: Prior to the initial occupancy of new buildings or additions and the final occupancy of altered existing buildings, submit this completed and signed form to: • The municipal building inspection office (refer to the plan approval letter for agency address) and • Safety and Buildings, 10541N Ranch Road Hayward, WI. 54843 Note: If the review was done by the municipality, the compliance statement goes only to the municipal building inspector. A copy is not needed by Safety & Buildings. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1)(m)]. 1. PROJECT INFORMATION: Please fill in the following with information from your plan approval letter. Transaction ID Number /f 0 Project Name 4g4,4, 0,/ - _54.44 - _y y ep Site Number - _(4/273,g_ Site location (number & street)_,fg D r /4_ 4 6gror - - -_— g City ❑ Village ❑ Town °f'2__ County of_ - 2. PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT: (Check Box A, B, C, or D to indicate purpose and complete any other applicable boxes and information. Attach additional pages if necessary.) Check those which apply: ,$ Building Object ID # /z e' _ ❑ HVAC Object ID # ❑ Lighting Object ID # ❑ Partial Completion _ Description of Portion Completed — A) Ar Statement of Substantial Compliance To the best of my knowledge, belief, and based on onslte observation, construction of the following building and /or HVAC items applicable to this project have been completed in substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications. Jil BUILDING /LIGHTING ITEMS 1. Structural system including submittal and erection of all building components 10. Exterior lighting & control requirements (trusses, precast, metal building, etc.) 11. Interior lighting & control requirements 2. Fire protection systems (sprinklers, alarms, smoke detectors) designed, installed, 12. All conditions of lighting plan approval and tested (including forward flow on back flow devices) by appropriately and applicable variances registered professionals 3. Shaft and stairway enclosure 4. Exits including exit and directional lights 5. Fire - resistive construction, enclosure of hazards, fire walls, labeled doors, class ❑ HVAC ITEMS of construction, fire stopped penetrations 6. Sanitation system (toilets, sinks, drinking facilities) 1. HVAC system including final test 7. Barrier -free including Comm 18 elevators and lifts 2. All conditions of HVAC plan approval and 8. Energy envelope requirements applicable variances 9. All conditions of building plan approval and applicable variances The following items are not in compliance and must be addressed: B) 0 Statement of Noncompliance Due to the following listed violations, this project is not ready for occupancy: _— C) ❑ Supervising Professional Withdrawn From Project (Use A or 8 above to indicate project status as of this date.) D) 0 Project Abandoned 3. SUPERVISING PROFESSIONAL S I %% �� rr i��NN� AT R FOR: Building ❑ HVAC ❑ Lighting--,��[J�����2 Date / Na a (please pr' or type) Phone number % .. / /5Customer ID # _I 02F0 ‘ Signature SBD -9720 (R.0712008) SBD -9720 (R.02/2004) ll NOV -25 -09 08:33 AM CONDON TOTAL COMFORT 9207485034 P.01 • I • • BUILDINGS, HVAC, COMPLIANCE STATEMENT SBD -9720 This form is required to be submitted by the supervising professional (architect, engineer, HVAC designer or electrical designer) observing construction of projects within buildings with total areas 50,000 cubic feet or greater and bleaches (Comm 81.40). Failure to submit this form may result in penalties as specified in Comm 61.23 and/or local ordinances. : this form must be submitted prior to the plan approval expiration date or another submittal may be required. i General Instructions: Prior to the initial occupancy of new buildings or additions and the final occupanc of ' altered existing buildings, submit this completed and signed form to: : • The municipal building inspection office (refer to the plan approval letter for agency address) 4.4 • Safety and Buildings, 1064114 Ranch Road Hayward, WI. 54843 • Note: If the review was done by the municipality, the compliance statement goes only to the municipal bu inspector. 'A copy is not needed by Safety & Buildings. I . Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1)(m)J. 1. PROJECT INFORMATION: Please fill in the following will information fro your plan approval letter. Transaction ID Number 1�1 t77 l� � � Project Name LC.Jll 1Cm1� c4-1 f SSG ii • • . Site Number 61 1 7 . . • Site location (number & street) __S:24.. lei . }'sc•E�_____ _ Utar_. M. City 0 Village 0 Town of si)( County of k-1 kAt4 EC c • . 2. PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT: (Check Box A, B, C, or D to indicate purpose and complete any other applicable boxes and information. Attach additional pages if necessary.) Check those which apply: 0 Building Object ID # 40 HVAC Object ID 0 1A 4 f-n► 6 0 Lighting Object ID # 0 Partial Completion _ 1_; Description of Portion Completed { A) 0 Statement of Substantial Compliance • I To the best of my knowledge, belief, and based on onslte observation, construction of the following building and /or fiVAC items applicable to this project have been completed in substantial compliance with the approved plans and i specifications. ! • • 0 BUILDING/LIGHTING ITEMS • 1. Structural system Including submlttal and erection of all building components 10. Exterior htinp 8 control requirements (trusses, precast, metal building. etc.) 11. Interior lighting 8 control requirements 2. Fire protection systems (sprinklers, alarms, smoke detectors) designed, 12. All conditions of lighting plan approval installed, and tested (Including forward flow on back flow devices) by and applicable variances appropriately registered professionals ! 3. Shaft and stairway enclosure 4. Exits including exit and directional lights • • 5. Fire - resistive construction, enclosure of hazards, fire walls, labeled doors, class X HVAC ITEMS of construction, fire stopped penetrations . B. Sanitation system (toilets, sinks, drinking facilities) 1. HVAC system Including final test 7. Barter -free including Comm 18 elevators and lifts 2. All conditions of HVAC plan approval an • 8. Energy envelope requirements applicable varlances ' 9. All conditions of building plan approval and applicable variances • The following Items are not In compliance and must be addressed: B) 0 Statement of Noncompliance Due to the following listed violations, this project is not ready for occupancy: C) 0 Supervising Professional Withdrawn From Project (Use A or B above to Indicate project status as of this date.) D) 0 Project Abandoned 3. SUPERVISING PROFESSIONAL S1NATURE FOR: 0 Building 4 HVAC 0 Lighting 1 eT1i4ti-. W flQ Date . ! ji'g2 41 . up" Name (please print or type) ��` Phone number 4% • 6:s Customer ID* age) , a O Signature S n 11,0 . SBD 0720 (R.07/2O081 CORRECTION NOTICE / FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JOB LOCATION: aDO - ' fj N Z.Cx`k-e- SZO City of Oshkosh Inspection � � nspection Services Division CONTRACTOR: 215 Church Avenue, PO Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903 -1130 PROJECT TO BE INSPECTED: �t�t- �j \,t) Phone: 2 250 -5050 Fax (9) 1 , Fax (920) 0) 233 6 -5084 TYPE OF INSPECTION: r Violations must be corrected and approved within 30 days unless otherwise noted. Call for re- inspections prior to concealment and/or occupancy. Upon completing the corrections, the owner /contractor /agent must sign and date at the bottom of this notice and return it to the Inspection Services Division by the Compliance Date of ITEM# ' CODE INSPECTION RESULTS C3�►� -`�'� ` '� `t Z-AlX Z),Uk. s Cc / %‘1.0.4 ct)- (� fie,) Gam' - J C, ems &3 .,v vt. a kS eorv\ s � ‘N1ol �1 v T C154 -t_'L t # 1-7 Mx-Ai t,) LA., Lt (J' t-- 1 L ► �1 C - 11014f9$1(5. 4 ")V\ �c� *-t _ ' ��z `� zCa . Z gel)(1r�:.t ()=-- ?ct,&) i t..0 V6160:‘ k V Lb St 19,n,Q•L 0,` Tit LIci oz.D. int.5x-( r '': w _r � ACTION TAI : ❑ Not Approved/ Insp. Report left on site r ot Approved/ his p. Report given to � `� (� Q � P eP S �� ��� �� ❑ Mailed/Faxed Signed ICJ t ems""`. \ 114 / 05 Inspection Services Division Date of Inspection Phone # ' certify that the violations listed on this Not Noticeaeport Print Name Company Signature: Date t 3 eg 5 Lq L i &S —MIZOL.X.AA CORRECTION NOTICE / FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JOB LOCATION: r - 5 7.p ).l eN ' Yr_`Z- ST' Cit of Oshkosh Inspection Services Division CONTRACTOR: O uj,. `Z- 215 Church Avenue, PO Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903 -1130 PROJECT TO BE INSPECTED: L Z Phone: (920) 236 -5050 Fax (920) 236 -5084 TYPE OF INSPECTION: H()i t U Violations must be corrected and approved within 30 days unless otherwise noted. Call for re- inspections prior to concealment and/or occupancy. Upon completing the corrections, the owner /contractor /agent must sign and date at the bottom of this notice and return it to the Inspection Services Division by the Compliance Date of ITEM# CODE INSPECTION RESULTS `7) CZ.S.CA b" 7X 4 ) % - a , q- - i , c Tip - r - - t,or ik k l R-4 b 5 (t0 CAL-t401,. – ' V * t- > N CX V C> u 4 e>4-11-42(15.4t - U.A CSC k�� (714 t,,t,,4 1 dim °C oic ‘siotiA4 047--- L I edit_ > Imo. ikys-rAc ACTION TAKEN: ❑ Not Approved/ Insp. Report left on site r ot Approved/ Insp. Report given to 150P, ❑ Mailed/Faxed Signed 13 tAgt , (otocl Inspection Services Division Orate of Inspection Phone # . �... , .. ' certify . that the listed on tins Notice/Report love, Print Name Company Signature: Date 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 01 BALCO BALANCING INC. 3135 Sundew Way Neenah, WI 54956 CERTIFIED TEST, ADJUST, AND BALANCE REPORT DATE 11/09 • PROJECT KOELLER STREET III ADDRESS OSHKOSH, WI ARCHITECT CRIES ARCHITECTURAL GROUP INC. NEENAH, WI ENGINEER CONDON TOTAL COMFORT INC. RIPON, WI HVAC CONTRACTOR CONDON TOTAL COMFORT INC. RIPON, WI NEBB TAB FIRM BALCO BALANCING INC. ADDRESS 3135 SUNDEW WAY NEENAH, WI retiF DANIEL. P. ANNON National Environmental Balancing Bureau cam 29 Fi 7 nTtoN 71 Exp. 3/31/10 0, yam dronic 5 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 02 BALCO BALANCING INC CERTIFICATION 3135 Sundpw Way Neenah, WI 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III ADDRESS OSHKOSH, WI THE DATA PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT IS AN EXACT RECORD OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND WAS OBTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEBB STANDARD PROCEDURES. ANY VARIANCES FROM DESIGN QUANTITIES WHICH EXCEED NEBB TOLERANCES ARE NOTED THROUGHOUT THIS REPORT. THE AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND BALANCED AND FINAL ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEBB "PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR TESTING, ADJUSTING. BALANCING OF ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS" AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. NEBB TAB FIRM BALCO BALANCING INC, REG.NO. 2971 CERTIFIED BY DANIEL P. CANNON DATE 11109 (Air TAB Supervisor) THE HYDRONIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND BALANCED AND FINAL ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEBB "PROCEDUREAL STANDARDS FOR TESTING, ADJUSTING, BALANCING OF ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS` AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. NEBB TAB FIRM BALCO BALANCING INC, REG. NO. 2971 CERTIFIED BY DANIEL P. CANNON DATE 11/09 (Hydronic TAB Supervisor) SUBMITTED AND CERTIFIED BY: NEBB TAB FIRM BALCO BALANCING INC. TAB SUPERVISOR DANIEL P. CANNON REG. NO. 2971 SIGNATURE • DATE 11/09 CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE 12/31/09 ,c0 8Qlancin s r. National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with DANIEL .C ANNON NEBB Certification Seal CERTIFICATION 2971 9 Exp. 21no /en H dronic S•k 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 03 BALCO BALANCING INC. INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REPORT 3135 SUNDEW WAY NEBB CERTIFIED NEENAH, WI 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III CALIBRATION INSTRUMENT /SERIAL NO. APPLICATION TEST HATE SHORTRIDGE ADM -860 / M926 I KAVEHSE 11/11/09 SHORTRIDGE ADM -R80 / M92875 FL HOOD 11/11/09 SHORTRIDGE ADM -860 / M92675 STATIC PRESSURES 11/11/09 EXTECH 461891 / Q377696 TACHOMETER 11/11/09 FLUKE - 322 / 95340509 VOLTS & AMPS 11/11/09 CHECK -I 1 626 / BBI -PY -1 CONTACT PYROMETER 11/11/09 EXTECH HD500 / 09085368 TEMPERATURE / HUMIDITY 11/11/09 HYDRO DATA HDM-300 / W03078 WATER PRESSURE 11/11/09 TEST DATE 11/00 READINGS BY A.KOEPKE/M.GENETT 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 04 BALCO BALANCING INC. AIR APPARATUS 3135 Sundew Way TEST REPORT Neenah, WI PROJECT KOELLER STREET III SYSTEM /UNIT F - LOCAL ION OSHKOSH, WI UNIT DATA MOTOR DATA Make/Model No. LENNOX Make /Frame - - Type /Size G61MPV -60C- 090 -10 H.P./RPM (W) 1 - Serial Number 5909J18796 Volts/Phase/Hertz 120/1/60 Arr. /Class VERT BLOW THRU _ F.L. Amps /S.F. 11.0 - Discharge UPBLAST Make Sheave - Make Sheave - Sheave Diam/Bore - Sheave Diam/Bore - Sheave & Distance - No. Belts/Make /Size DIRECT DRIVE Sheave Oper. Diam. DIRECT DRIVE No. Filters/Type/Size 2 T.A. 12X24X2 TEST DATA DESIGN ACTUAL TEST DATA DESIGN ACTUAL Total CFM (Us) 1900 1 607 Discharge S.P. - .19 Total S.P. - - Suction S.P. - .43 Fan RPM - HIGH Reheat Coil Diff S.P. - - External S.P. - .62 Cooling Coil Diff S.P. - - - Motor Volts T1 T2 T3 120 121 Preheat Coil Diff S.P. - - Motor Amps T1 T2 T3 - • 7.4 Filters Diff S.P. - - Outside Air CFM (Vs) 260 254 Return Air CFM (I /s) 1640 1403 . Vortex Damp Position - - Outside Air Damp Position - - Return Alr Damp Position - - REMARKS TEST DATE 11/09 READINGS BY A.Koepk /M. aerie-Et National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 05 BALCO BALANCING INC. AIR OUTLET 3135 SUNDEW WAY TEST REPORT NEENAH, WI 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III SYSTEM F -1 OUTLET MANUFACTURER - TEST APPARATUS ADM - 860 AREA - OUTLET DESIGN PRELIMINARY FINAL PERCENT OF SERVED NO, TYPE SIZE AK VEL AIRFLW VEL AIRFLW VEL AIRFLW DESIGN SUPPLY 1 240B 1 - 150 - 134 108 2 2408 1 - 150 - 129 3 2408 1 - 150 - 131 103 2406 1 - 50 - 42 COPY ROOM 2406 1 - 90 - 76 119 1 2408 1 - 150 - 126 2 2408 1 - 150 - 137 10R 1 240R 1 - 1R() - 140 2 2408 1 - 160 - 144 100 2406 1 - 236 - 194 101 1 2408 1 - 236 - 203 2 2408 1 - 236 - 201 MIN O.A. DUCT 20X14 1.94 134 260 131 254 REMARKS: TEST DATE 11/09 READINGS BY A.KOEPKE /M.GENETT National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 06 BALCO BALANCING INC. AIR APPARATUS 3135 Sundew Way TEST REPORT Neenah, WI PROJECT KOELLER STREET III SYSTEM /UNIT F - LOCATION OSHKOSH, WI UNIT DATA MOTOR DATA Make/Model No. LENNOX MaKe /Frame - - Type/Size G61 MPV - 090 - H.P./RPM (W) 1 - Serial Number 5909J18794 Volts /Phase/Hertz 120/1/60 Arr. /Class VERT BLOW THRU __ _ F.L. Amps /S.F. _ 11.0 - Discharge UPBLAST Make Sheave - Make Sheave .. Sheave Dlam /Bore - Sheave Diem /Bore - Sheave & Distance - No. Belts/Make /Size DIRECT DRIVE Sheave Oper. Diam. DIRECT DRIVE No. Filters/Type /Size 2 T.A. 24X12X2 TEST DATA DESIGN ACTUAL TEST DATA DESIGN ACTUAL Total CFM (Ws) 1400 1488 Discharge 3.P. - .42 Total S.P. - - Suction S.P. - .33 Fan RPM - HIGH Reheat Coil Diff S.P. - - Extemal S.P. - .75 Cooling Coil Diff S,P. - - Motor Volts T1 T2 T3 120 121 Preheat Coil Diff S.P. - - Motor Amps T1 T2 T3 - 7.2 Filters Diff S.P. - - Outside Air CFM (Ifs) 217 237 Retum Air CFM (I /s) 1183 1251 Vortex Damp Position - - Outside Air Damp Position - Retum Air Damp Position - - REMARKS TEST DATE READINGS BY National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal '.., F „ - --. 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 07 BALCO BALANCING INC. AIR OUTLET 3135 SUNDEW WAY TEST REPORT NEENAH, WI 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III SYSTEM F -2 OUTLET MANUFACTURER - TEST APPARATUS ADM -860 AREA OUTLET DESIGN PRELIMINARY FINAL PERCENT OF SERVED NO. TYPE SIZE AK VEL A I VEL AIRFLW VEL AIRFLW DESIGN SUPPLY 118 2408 1 - 225 - 228 115 2408 1 - 225 - 235 114 2408 1 - 193 - 208 113 2406 1 - 93 - 98 112 2406 1 - 93 - 101 111 2406 1 - , 93 - 96 110 2406 1 93 - 99 109 2406 1 - 93 - 102 102 1 2408 1 - 150 - 159 2 2408 1 - , 150 - 162 MIN O.A. : DUCT 8 0,D. .35 620 217 377 237 REMARKS: TEST DATE 11/09 READINGS BY A.KOEPKE /M.GENETT National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 08 BALCO BALANCING INC FAN TEST REPORT 3135 Sundew Way Neenah, Wi 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III FAN DATA FAN NO. 1 EF -1 FAN NO. EF -2 FAN NO. EF -3 Location RESTROOM RESTROOM FURNACE ROOM Service RESTROOM EXHAUST R EXHAUST FURNACE RM EXHAUST Manufacturer BROAN BROAN BROAN Model Number L300 L300 684 D/2884F - A Serial Number - - - Type /Class CEF I CEF I CEF I Motor Make /Style - OPEN - OPEN BROAN OPEN Motor H.P. /RPM /Frame (W) - - - - - - _ - _ Volts /Phase /Hertz 120/1/60 120/1/60 120/1/60 F.L. Amps/S.F. 2.6 - 2.6 - .5 - Motor Sheave Make /Model - - Motor Sheave Diam. /Bore - - - Fan Sheave Make - - - Fan Sheave Diam /Bore - - - No. Belts /Make /Size - - - Sheave & Distance DIRECT DRIVE DIRECT DRIVE DIRECT DRIVE TEST DATA DESIGN 1 ACTUAL DESIGN 1 ACTUAL DESIGN 1 ACTUAL CFM(I /s) 200 255 200 261 75 78 Fan RPM - HIGH SPEED - HIGH SPEED - HIGH SPEED S.P. In /Out - .091.15 - .07/.14 - .041.10 Total S.P. - .24 - .21 - .14 Voltage T1,T2,T3 120 121 120 120 120 120 AmperageTl,T2,T3 - 2.2 - 2 - .4 REMARKS: TEST DATE 11/09 READ BY A.KOEPKE/M.GENETT National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal 11/25/2009 13:12 9208361702 BALCO BALANCING PAGE 09 BALCO BALANCING INC, AIR OUTLET 3135 SUNL) W WAY TEST REPORT NEENAH, WI 54956 PROJECT KOELLER STREET III SYSTEM EF'S OUTLET MANUFACTURER - TEST APPARATUS ADM -860 AREA OUTLET DESIGN PRELIMINARY FINAL PERCENT OF SERVED NO. TYPE SIZE AK VEL AIRFLW VEL AIRFLW VEL AIRFLW DESIGN EF -1 RESTROOM 14X14 1 - 200 - 255 EF -2 RESTROOM 14X14 1 - 200 - 261 EF -3 MECH RM 11X11 1 - 75 - 78 • REMARKS: TEST DATE 11/09 READINGS BY A,KOEPKE/M,GENETT National Environmental Balancing Bureau Report Not Valid Unless Stamped with NEBB Certification Seal COMcheck Software Version 3.6.0 /1141*‘fil Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate 2006 IECC Section 1: Project Information Project Type: Addition Project Title : Koeller Street 11I Construction Site: Owner /Agent: Designer /Contractor: 524 N. Koeller Street 612730 Koeller Street III Bruce Cottrell Oshkosh, WI 54901 524 N. Koeller Street Cottrell Design, Inc. 54901 1500 Temple More Lane Green Bay, WI 54313 920 -490 -9415 cottrelldesign @new.rr.com Section 2: General Information Building Use Description by: Activity Type Activity Tyoe(s) Floor Area Office 10043 Section 3: Requirements Checklist Interior Lighting: 1. Total proposed watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts. Allowed Watts Proposed Watts Complies 10043 5967 YES Controls, Switching, and Wiring: 2. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor). Exceptions: Areas designated as security or emergency areas that must be continuously illuminated. Lighting in stairways or corridors that are elements of the means of egress. ❑ 3. Master switch at entry to hoteUmotel guest room. ❑ 4. Individual dwelling units separately metered. ❑ 5. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction by at least 50 %. Exceptions: Only one luminaire in space; An occupant- sensing device controls the area; The area is a contdor, storeroom, restroom, public lobby or sleeping unit. Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.ft. ❑ 6. Automatic lighting shutoff control in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ft. Exceptions: Sleeping units, patient care areas; and spaces where automatic shutoff would endanger safety of security. ❑ 7. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Lighting intended for 24 hour use. ❑ 8. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires (No single -lamp ballasts). Exceptions: Project Title: Koeller Street III ___,. .__ -_,__ ._.___. Data filename: C:1Documents and Settings\OwnerlDesktop12009 DIHLR P Report date: 10/21/09 Comchedc forrn.cck Projects\209082 Dumke & Associates Werner Ei?ec1209 Page 1 of 3 Electronic high-frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair. Section 4: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2006 IECC requirements in COMcheck Version 3.6.0 and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. 1. 7ZLt fir--d-114.)C&r7 /s ? 4/ Zfrs' Name - Title ignature Date _ Project Title: Koeller Street III Report date: 10/21/09 Data filename: C:\Documents and SettingslOwner1Desktop12009 DIHLR Projects1209082 Dumke & Associates Werner Elect209082 Comcheck form.cck Page 2 of 3 COMcheck Software Version 3.6.0 Interior Lighting Application Worksheet 2006 IECC Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts (ft2) Watts / ft2 (B x C) Office 10043 1 10043 Total Allowed Watts = 10043 Section 2: Proposed Lighting Power Calculation A 8 C D E Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast lamps/ # of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. Office (10043 sq.ft.) Linear Fluorescent 1: A: Recessed Indirect/48" T8 32W / Electronic 3 37 88 3256 Linear Fluorescent 2: B: Troffer / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 3 2 88 176 Incandescent 1: C: Recessed Can / Incandescent 65W 1 39 65 2535 Total Proposed Watts = 5967 Section 3: Compliance Calculation If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Proposed Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 10043 Total Proposed Watts = 5967 Project Compliance = 4076 Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 41% better than code \` \ „ • BRUCE E • L • COT : 9 70 -007 - G C: reen Ba • W • 72 a • • • . T /d /22/ Project Title: Koeller Street III Report date: 10/21/09 Data filename: C:1Documents and Settings\OwneADesktopl2009 DIHLR Projects1209082 Dumke & Associates Wemer EIec1209082 Comcheck form.cck Page 3 of 3 Wisconsin Department of Commerce OFFICE USE: Trans ID: APPLICATION FOR REVIEW Assigned Reviewer BUILDINGS, HVAC, LIGHTING, FIRE AND COMPONENTS — SBD -118 Assigned olr: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law s. 15.04(1)(m), Stab.] Revie�weejr Date*: For pre - scheduling of building HVAC, and fee plans, use the Enter Previous Related Trans. ID 1 applicable: -i � --L ' ) • electronic online request.forcommerpal building plan. ., eppobkmenfs found'at trill : //corivrhenoe.y,, oov/SB/SB- (K no privious related transaction is Provided, plan review will be based on the current node, except for DiyPtanReview.hfnfp.This form is to be used only for mailing or revisions. If a previous related transaction is entered and the parent building approval transaction has dropping off plans without an appointment, or it you are not expired, you may elect below to use the code in effect at the time of that approval for follow -up scheduling a Revision or Lighting via FAX (see Box 13 for revision, HVAC and fire protection submittals related to that building approval. Note that this further information). Check our website at submittars approval would then expire no later than the parent building approval.) htto:// commeroe .wiaov /SB/SB- DivForms.htrit for the most ❑ Please review under the code in effect at the time of the parent building approval. current version of this form. We may redistribute plans to Circle your choice of office. 1.Next available appt In any office 2. Credit Say another office if needed to reasonably balance turnaround 3. Hayward 4. LaCrosse S. Madison 6. Shawano 7. Waukesha times. You may monitor the stabs of your plan at FOR SCHEDULING REVISIONS BY FAX - Enter date plan will be in our office: t / r J.u.h L .L : tr .. 61d .y.n - -- _ - - -- - Vlihere should we send the Appointment Confirmation: O E -mail: ❑ Fax 1.a. Type of Submittal or Service 2. Occupancy Type Additional Non Accessory 3. Construction Information Requested (check alt that apply) Major Use - Check Use with Occupancies - Circle All Construction Class - Circle One () New the Greatest Floor Area that Apply) IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB . () Alteration - Level: ❑ 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 , () Extension A AI erat evel: ❑ 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ( ) A Am Al A2 A3 A4 A5 Area (project area, include all levels): / � 1 T / 13 sq it B Business/Office / ' O () Revision E Educational E Number of Floor Levels () Footing & Foundation Plans Only () F Factory/Industrial F1 F2 • () Permission to Start () H Hazardous H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 Total Buildingyolume is less than 50,000 Cu. Ft () Follow Up of a Denial Within 8 Months ( ) I Instihntion Daycare/CBRF 11 12 13 14 yes ✓ (Lo () Preliminary Consultation (contact O M Mercentile/Retail M — — reviewer before scheduling or submitting) () R Residential R1 R2 R3 R4 Seismic Review Threshold (circle one) () Structural Framework - Shell Only () S Sage 052 1. B-F and greater than 1 story 2. A or 1 story () Multiple Identical Buildings (see box 5) ( 1U Utititv/Misc 1J 3. Non-Structural Alteration Number of Buildings 4. Project Informatio Fill in all known information Site Number If Known b. Objects Submitted for Review as Project/Site Name E. LC. -,_t . k- S' -- .i cr 7 1 Current Review (check all that apply) ( ) Building Tenant name or building designation ( ) HVAC Previous Tenant Name r Lighting & Emergency Egress ( ) Fire Suppression (see box 7) Number & Street 6 /...4 c's- ,.•� ++- ( )Fire Detection/Alarm (see box 7) C ,, vAs C S e City (y Village () Town () of C4riAf /4'S" Other Projects (Stand Alone from above) 5. Identical Buildings (NOTE: Complete a separate application for each non - Identical building) ( ) Bleacher Building/Facility Name/Designation Building/Facillty Address O Canopy () Kitchen Exhaust Hood () Membrane Construction () Rack Supported Storage Building • () Elevated Pedestrian Access c. Structural Component Plan(s) which accompany this current plan submittal Desifiner's Project Number (If Applicable) Add Add'I Sheets if Needed (check all that apply): 6. After plans are reviewed, please: (check all that apply) 'Refers to customer number from () Roof Truss () Metal Bldg b ( ) Floor Truss ) Fire Escape ❑ Call Customer 1, 2, 3. 4 (circle number)* ❑ Mail plans to customer 1, 2, 3, 4 (circle number)* ' () Steel Girder O Precast Plank ❑ Hold ns for pickup ' ( ) Laminated Wood () Precast WaN P� Pi uP by designer designated agent , r Designer IMn / onatlon (Customer 1) First Time Submitter Yes - No Designer information (Customer 2) First Time Submitter — Yes No First Name Last Name Customer Number First Name. Last Name Customer Number ce C -7"7 Z U,. 2.o� 7 Company Name Company Name ed 7 yftc. L. 01. S/4„4 INC. Address 5 cit./ 7 , 1 C -4- /�/ 4 - 1.1 Address City State 4 (9 digits) City State Zip+4 (9 digits) ' 6 4 ,f� , / "e7 /r sY one Number (area ) Fax E-Mail Phone Number (area code) Fax E-Mail S2e)L/Sa pole) /1 � ci2o)4ic - Jrizi .,% Check others if applicable Check others 1 applicable () Designer of _ BIdQ._HVAC, k Lighting Fire arm Fire Suppression () Designer of _ Bldg — HVAC, _Lighting — Fire Alarm _Fire Suppression ` Al 1 Designer A/E IS' , - 7 tr Designer A/E i , ( ) Supervising Professional NE o f _ Bldg HVAC () Supervising Professional A/E 1 of _ Bldg _ HVAC ) Props ty Owner (not Meld..) Information ( Customer 3 ) Other (Customer 4) Adel Owner Designer Max ',• to Payer First Name Last Name Customer Number" First Name Last Name Customer Number Company Name /,_40 - G �C ri- -{ 7.4.L r , ' T Company Name z,, 3, t , ix£ ! . t Address 2 , /ter << C Wit: r^ Address 1 x r City ' State Z +4 (9 digits) City ,. "` rt" ^' k State Zip +4 (9 digits) ( �Srl/c� SaJ G.J/ 57u� :., r Plane Number (area code) Fax E-Mail Phone Nu=mber (area code) Fax E -Mail SBD -118 (R. 3/01/2009) r q 2 ,r }{'e .^? ' "• 0 : w °"" r C ti ° v Ir o FW ' -'- • ' ` *,d ,JO"WSr, 'a.'c ° " a ' Z3 ''t g 4, . "' s °1,Y.7 E. +f: z ° i y 1 ar`` ICA .e o tec hnic _3 o C SUBSURFACE;EXPLORA 0 le © ' r ®lNa ° ,- Iii@ JC\1' ' ° :0 ND BBA,SIN a . ° ° . ° . 4 ° o a o 0 0° a o ose D P ° _ ((??�� �� X�71I fi , ° C a m 0 Ul1 V u✓ �N IJV1f ° ° ° ° ° s w1G° �f fit1 ° ° o, [ ° fl D cc, n on tqG �f ° ° 0 ry' o R r I t It s y tx ` a Y �k 'rs'. �,r � w TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 • General • Purpose • Scope • Authorization SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 • Site Features • Project Description EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES 2 • Scope Summary • Field Exploration • Laboratory Testing DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 • General • Soil Conditions • Groundwater Observations EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 • General Development Considerations • Site Preparation • Foundation Analysis • Floor Slab and Pavement Subgrades • Exterior /Unheated Area Slab • Utility Construction CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 12 • Groundwater Control • Excavation and Site Drainage • Seismic Design Considerations STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA CONSIDERATIONS 13 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GENERAL COMMENTS 17 APPENDIX (in order of appearance) Figure 1 - Boring Location Diagram Soil Boring Logs General Notes Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 1 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the subsurface exploration, and foundation and stormwater management basin evaluation for the proposed Koeller Street Office Building in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The work was performed for Mr. Leland Franke of Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at specific boring locations on the site, and to establish parameters for use by the design engineers and architects in preparing the foundation, floor slab, pavement, and stormwater basin designs for the proposed project. Scope The scope of services included a site reconnaissance, the subsurface exploration, a determination of soil characteristics by field and laboratory testing, and an evaluation and analysis of the data obtained. The scope of the field work, including the number, depth, and locations of the borings was determined by the client. Authorization The description of services and authorization to perform this subsurface exploration and analysis were in the form of a signed acceptance copy of M.E.S. Proposal No. 12 -9087, dated June 15, 2009. The general conditions for the performance of the work were referenced in the proposal. This report has been prepared on behalf of, and exclusively for the use of Gries Architectural Group, Inc. The information contained in this report may not be relied upon by any other parties without the express written consent of MES, and acceptance by such parties of MES' General Conditions. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Features The project site is located on the east side of north Koeller Street approximately 100 feet south of the intersection with Taft Avenue in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. At the time of the exploration, the site was vacant. However, a former house was previously located on the northwest corner of the site. Pavement remnants associated with the house are present in Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 2 areas. A large pile of possible topsoil fill was located in the center of the site. The topography of the general area is flat and the project site is also relatively flat with an elevation difference of approximately 3 feet, sloping down towards the north. At the time of the exploration, the surface of the site was firm and the drill rig experienced no difficulty in moving around. Project Description From the information provided by client, it is understood that the proposed project will .consist of a one story structure, without a basement, about 75 feet by 255 feet in plan dimension to be constructed in two phases, each being approximately 9,500 square feet in size. No basement is planned. The building construction will be of steel, masonry, and wood frame, with a concrete slab -on -grade floor. Structural loads were not provided, but are estimated to be light to moderate in magnitude. Based upon the information provided by Mr. Frank of Gries Architectural Group Inc., it is understood that the finished first floor elevation will be EL. 760.0. A planned finished first floor elevation of EL. 760.0 was shown on the topographic map provided to MES. The existing grades across the property presently range between about EL. 759.6 and 757.0. Therefore, on the basis of the planned first floor elevation, only minor grade changes are anticipated. However, this will also be dependent on the subgrade preparation criteria, to be discussed in a later section. It is understood that the proposed pavement areas will be subjected to relatively light traffic volumes and loading, with 50 cars and 1 truck per day. It is understood that stormwater management basins will be located on the west, north, and east sides of the site. The size, type, bottom elevation and other design details of the three basins were not provided. EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES Scope Summary The field and laboratory data utilized in the evaluation and analysis of the subsurface materials was obtained by drilling exploratory test borings, securing soil samples by the split -spoon sampling method, and subjecting the samples to laboratory testing. With respect to the stormwater management areas, the field and laboratory work for classification of the subgrade soils was performed to provide information for use by the basin design personnel when considering requirements of Chapter NR151 of the Wisconsin Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 3 Administrative Code, and of WDNR Technical Standard 1002, "Site Evaluation for Stormwater Infiltration" guidelines. The design of the proposed stormwater management area was beyond the scope of services for this project. Field Exploration Eight (8) soil test borings were drilled for this project to a depth of 15 feet below the existing • ground surface. The number, depths, and locations of the borings were provided by the client. The borings were located in the field by the drill crew utilizing conventional taping procedures referenced to existing site features and apparent property lines. They are considered accurate to within a few feet. . The surface elevations shown on the logs were estimated by interpolation of a 1 foot contour map of the property, provided by the client. The elevations are considered accurate to within about 1 foot. The soil test borings were performed with a truck- mounted rotary drilling rig utilizing continuous flight hollow stem augers to advance the holes. Representative samples were obtained by the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) method in .general accordance with ASTM D -1586 procedures at 2.5 foot intervals to 10 feet, and then at 5 foot intervals thereafter to the end of the. borings. As an exception, samples were obtained at continuous 2 foot intervals at borings B -1, B -2, and B -3, which were performed within the proposed stormwater management areas. • The SPT provides a means of determining the relative density of granular soils and comparative consistency of cohesive soils, thereby providing a method of evaluating the relative strength and compressibility characteristics of the subsoils. The SPT soil samples were transferred into clean glass jars immediately after retrieval, and returned to the laboratory upon completion of the field operations. Samples will be discarded unless other instructions are received. All soil samples were visually classified by a soils engineer in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D- 2488 -75): After completion of the borings, the auger holes were backfilled to the ground surface with bentonite chips. A copy of the Soil Boring Logs and Boring Location Diagram (Figure 1) are enclosed in the Appendix. The soil stratification shown on the logs represents the approximate soil conditions in the actual boring locations at the time of the exploration. The terms and symbols used on the logs are described in the General Notes found in the Appendix. Laboratory Physical Testing Soil samples obtained from the exploration were visually classified in the laboratory, and subjected to testing, which included moisture content determination. Selected cohesive soil samples were tested in unconfined compression with a controlled strain loading rate and /or Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation. Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 4 with a calibrated hand penetrometer to aid in evaluating the soil strength characteristics. The values of strength tests performed on soil samples obtained by the Standard Penetration Test Method (SPT) are considered approximate, recognizing that the SPT method provides a representative but somewhat disturbed soil sample. The laboratory . testing was performed in general accordance with the respective ASTM methods, as applicable, and the results are shown on the boring Togs in the Appendix. DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . General A description of the subsurface conditions encountered at the test boring locations is shown on the Soil Boring Logs. The lines of demarcation shown on the logs represent approximate boundaries between the various soil classifications. It must be recognized that the soil descriptions are considered representative for the specific test hole location, but that variations may occur between and beyond the sampling intervals and boring locations. Soil depths, topsoil and layer thicknesses, and demarcation lines utilized for preconstruction planning should not be expected to yield exact and final quantities. A summary of the major soil profile components is described in the following paragraphs. Soil Conditions The surface materials present at the boring locations consisted of about 2 inches of asphalt in the location of B -1, and 2 to 6 inches of reddish brown sandy loam to silty loam to sandy silt . topsoil at B -2, B -3, and B -7. A discernible surface topsoil layer was not present at the remaining boring locations. The soils beneath the topsoil at B -1, B -2, B -3 and B -7; and the surface soils at the remaining borings consist of predominately reddish brown silty clay to clay loam to : depths of about 5 to 7.5 feet (EL. 749.5 to EL. 754.6±). At B -8, the soil fill was underlain by concrete rubble to a depth of about 13.5 feet (EL. 743.5±). The underlying natural soils were predominantly silty clay. The cohesive soils were stiff to hard in consistency. Unconfined compressive strengths ranged from 1.5 to 4.5 tsf. The fill and possible buried topsoil materials were classified as such based on their varied visual characteristics and composition. However; it must be recognized that in the absence of foreign substances and /or debris within the soil samples obtained, it is difficult to distinguish between natural soils and clean soil fill. The foregoing discussion of soil conditions on this site represents a generalized soil profile as determined at the test boring locations. A more detailed description and supporting data for each test location can be found on the individual Soil Boring Logs. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 5 Groundwater Observations Groundwater observations were made during the drilling operations, and in open boreholes at completion. Groundwater was encountered during auger advancement in boring B -2 at a depth of 13 feet (EL. 744.5) below the ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered in the remaining boreholes at the time of drilling. All of the holes caved to varying depths upon withdrawal of the auger; therefore observations could not be made below the caved depth. On the basis of the field observations, the soil coloration and relative moisture contents, the . free water level at the borings, is judged to be generally below the termination depth of the borings at the time of the exploration. The observation at B -2 may be attributable to an isolated perched zone. The groundwater observations reported herein are . considered approximate. It must be recognized that groundwater levels fluctuate with time due to variations in seasonal precipitation, lateral drainage conditions, and soil permeability characteristics. Longer term monitoring would be required to better evaluate groundwater levels on this site. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Development Considerations Fill soils and possible buried topsoil with somewhat variable support characteristics were present to a depth of about. 5 feet (EL. 752.2 to EL. 754.6±) below existing grade at the building test boring locations. The fill soils are not recommended for foundation support due to potential excessive total and differential settlements. The proposed structure can be supported by means of conventional spread footings extended through the existing .fill and buried topsoil, to bear on suitable natural soils, or upon newly placed compacted structural fill (or lean concrete slurry) used to replace the existing materials. About 1.5 to 4 feet of overexcavation is expected to be necessary below frost depth in the planned building area to reach suitable materials. However, some variation should be expected The existing fill soils can be utilized for support of the floor slab after proper subgrade preparation. However, some overexcavation of unsuitable soils will likely be necessary. Conventional asphalt pavement can be used in the parking lot and driveway areas. However, some increased maintenance must be expected due to the presence of variable strength existing fill. A discussion of the building foundation and pavement design parameters, as well as the support conditions for the floor slab and pavement are included in later sections. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 6 Site Preparation The presence of organic topsoil and vegetation . in the subgrade can adversely affect the serviceability of structural fills, foundations, floor slabs, pavements, and other structures placed upon them. Approximately 2 to 8 inches of . topsoil were present on the surface of the - site at some of the boring locations. However, some variation should be anticipated. All existing pavement, .topsoil, vegetation, trees, roots and other organic matter must be .stripped from the areas of footings, floor slabs, pavements, sidewalks, and other structures. Exposed subgrades not be allowed to undergo significant moisture changes, or to desiccate, since subsequent swelling, possibly resulting in slab or pavement deformation, may occur with the addition of moisture. . Site preparation will require removal of the remnants of former buildings, including foundations and underground utilities. Extensive areas of loose backfill material may be encountered within utility trenches, adjacent to the existing structures, and in former building and basement areas. These will also require removal. The areas, including basements, must then be properly backfilled with compacted structural fill. Prior to the backfilling, the areas must be observed by an MES representative to evaluate the suitability of the subgrade for subsequent support of the new building, utilities, or other structures. After stripping the topsoil and cutting high areas of the site to the planned finished grade, and prior to the placement of new fill which may be placed to raise grades, the subgrade must be improved by surface compaction with a minimum of 10 overlapping passes (2 sets of 5 at right angles) with a heavy (minimum 10 ton static weight) compactor. The subgrade must then be thoroughly proofroiled to detect unstable, yielding soils, which must be removed or improved by appropriate preparation and compaction techniques. Proofrolling should consist of overlapping passes in a perpendicular grid pattern of a fully - loaded tandem -axle dump truck, or other equipment of similar size and weight. However, care must be used on this site to avoid disturbing the near surface fine- grained soils during the proofrolling, especially during . periods of precipitation or spring thaw. Proofrolling with rubber tired equipment may be preferable, but should be performed in consultation with the geotechnical engineer at the time of construction. Unstable soils should be expected, especially within existing fill. When encountered, they must be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. Scarification, drying and recompaction of wet soils or removal and replacement with suitable fill, are two methods, which can be considered, but this must be determined by the soils engineer at the time of construction. Low areas may then be .raised to the planned grades with . suitable properly compacted fill. It must be recognized that the silty clay soils present on the site are highly moisture sensitive, and substantial difficulty with subgrade preparation can be expected if the soils are wet during construction. The exposed subgrade in the building and pavement areas is expected to consist of at least some areas of cohesive soils. Such soils are considered highly moisture sensitive and subject to softening. Therefore, equipment and worker traffic must be kept to a minimum on subgrade Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 7 bearing surfaces, especially during times of precipitation or following spring thaw. Some . difficulty with subgrade preparation can be expected in wet or cold weather conditions. Removal of unsuitable portions of the near surface soils and replacement with structural fill will likely be required, on at least an isolated basis, especially if earthwork is not carried out during periods of relatively warm, dry weather, which provide more favorable conditions for drying of these soils. Any soft zones, which cannot be improved by scarification and aeration, must be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill, such as clean crushed stone; .possibly in conjunction with the use of a geotextile fabric. Lime and fly ash modification are two additional remedial measures which can be considered. However, this must only be performed at the direction and under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer. A proper mix design must be performed prior to the performance of any modification. Substantial construction delays and difficulty with subgrade stabilization should be expected during periods of wet and /or cool weather. Consideration should be given to installing construction roads to reduce disturbance to the sensitive subgrade soils. Every effort must be made to keep excavations dry. If construction proceeds during wet weather, some additional overexcavation may be necessary. If weather permits, the soil could be dried and recompacted. A crushed stone working mat, possibly in conjunction with a geotextile fabric may also be feasible to help stabilize subgrades. Site grading runoff should be directed to catch basins, so that the potential for the softening of the foundation and pavement subgrade soils is reduced. Where the removal of unsuitable bearing material is performed beneath proposed footings, the excavation must extend laterally beyond the perimeter of the foundation for a distance at least equal to the thickness of the fill below the footing bottom. This general guideline also applies to instances where a raised structural fill pad is constructed to achieve a bearing elevation greater than existing grades. The influence zone of footing stresses can be represented as an imaginary 45° line extending downward and outward from the footing bottom. All fill placed within this zone after cutting to firm soil must be properly engineered, from the bottom of the cut, up to the floor slab subgrade elevation. If site grades are raised in excess of 2 feet, the first lift of new fill must be placed so as to extend a minimum lateral distance of 5 feet beyond the planned top building pad. dimension (for fills less than 5 feet in thickness), or for a distance equal to at least 1 foot laterally beyond the top pad dimension for every foot of fill thickness (for fills greater than 5 feet in depth). Subsequent lifts can then be placed on an approximate 1 H:1V slope back up to the planned top perimeter dimension of the pad. Proper moisture control is essential to reduce the amount of compactive effort necessary to achieve the desired densities. When a firm and stable subgrade is established, low areas may be raised to planned grades with properly compacted structural fill. Any new fill should be a clean granular soil, such as those materials ' meeting the gradations outlined in Section 209 or 305 of the State of Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 8 Wisconsin Standard Specification for Highway and Structure Construction. If fine- grained soils, such as those with high silt or clay content are used, they should generally be placed over large open areas, where conditions are more favorable for the proper placement and compaction of such materials. It must be recognized that high silt or clay content materials are difficult to compact when placed at moisture contents beyond a few percent of the optimum moisture content. In addition the near surface soils across the site are considered moisture . sensitive;. therefore, some difficulty with subgrade preparation should be expected; especially if they become wet during construction. Fill must be placed in layers of not more than nine (9 inches in thickness, at moisture contents at or optimum, and be compacted to a minimum density of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM designation D -698. Silt, clay, and wet granular soils are not suitable' for reuse as compacted fill in trenches, or adjacent to foundation stem walls or retaining walls. Proper moisture control is essential to reduce the amount of compactive effort necessary to achieve the desired densities. This is especially true of clayey soils, where scarification and aeration may be required to achieve near - optimum moisture levels prior to compaction. A sheepsfoot roller is generally required for compaction of clayey soils, whereas a vibratory smooth drum roller is preferred for granular material. Small hand- operated compactors should be used in confined areas; granular fills are generally more readily compacted to the required densities in such applications. It is recommended that well - graded granular soils be utilized as backfill in new utility trenches and along side below grade walls to reduce the potential for consolidation and settlement of the fill. All fill soils must be placed and compacted under engineering controlled conditions, to provide suitable support for overlaying structures and roadways. Additional guidance can be provided at the time of construction in the selection process for grade - raising fill and trench backfill. The selection of fill materials for various applications should be done in consultation with the soils engineer. Similarly, the evaluation of the subgrade and placement and compaction of fill for structural applications should be monitored and tested by a qualified representative of the soils engineer. Foundation Analysis The proposed structure may be supported by a conventional . spread foundation system. However, based upon the borings and the planned finished floor elevation (EL. 760.0), the soils at the approximate footing bearing elevations (EL. 758.5 and EL. 756.0 for interior and exterior footings, respectively) are estimated to consist of existing fill, which is potentially variable in strength and support characteristics and not considered suitable for support. All footings must therefore be extended though the existing fill and any buried topsoil to bear upon underlying natural clay soils, encountered at a depth of about 5 feet (EL. 7522 to EL. 754.6) in B-4 through B -7. Undercuts on the order of about 1.5 to 4 feet below the typical frost Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 9 depth may be required. However, some variation should be expected. Spread and continuous wall footings bearing upon suitable natural soils, or upon compacted structural fill or lean concrete slurry used to replace unsuitable materials, may be designed for a net allowable soil pressure of 3,000 psf. The suitability of the existing soils for support of the proposed foundation must be determined . by testing by a qualified geotechnical engineer during construction, utilizing static cone penetrometer tests or dynamic cone penetrometer tests for cohesive and granular soils, respectively. Soft, loose, or .otherwise unsuitable materials not disclosed byy the borings, may be encountered in the foundation excavations at the bearing elevation. If unsuitable existing soil is present, it must be removed throughout a zone extending one foot laterally for each two feet removed below the foundation, on either side of the planned footing. The over- excavated area must be backfilled with structural compacted fill. As an alternate, the excavation could extend. 4 inches beyond the plan footing width to suitable bearing soil and then backfilled with lean (500 to 1000 psi) concrete mix to planned footing grade to reduce lateral over- excavation. In lieu of the use of deep spread footings, the fill soils and any unsuitable natural materials could be removed from beneath new footings and the excavation backfilled to the original planned bearing depth with a lean concrete slurry mix. If it is elected to utilize a lean concrete slurry to replace the unsuitable soils, the foundation excavations should be 4 inches wider than the proposed footing width and must extend through the unsuitable bearing materials to the natural soils. The slurry must be placed .immediately after excavation to avoid intrusion of soil into the excavation. The concrete should contain sufficient aggregate and cement to attain a 28 -day compressive strength of at least 1000 psi. Some sloughing or caving of the overlying soils may be experienced. Should this occur during the slurry placement, the area must be removed and recast. Additionally, should caving become extensive, it may be necessary to substantially widen excavations to avoid soil intrusion into the concrete slurry. This may result in the use of additional slurry quantities significantly in excess of preconstruction budget estimates. All perimeter footings must be placed at a depth of 4 feet below the finish grade for frost protection. Due to periodic severity of winters in this area, it is recommended that footings in poorly heated or unheated areas of the building also be placed at least 4 feet below the adjacent exterior grade. interior footings not subject to frost action may be placed at a shallow depth . of 18 inches below the floor slab, provided they bear on suitable natural soils or engineered fills. All footings must be protected from the effects of frost if construction is carried out during winter months. It is recommended that the footings supporting individual columns have a minimum dimension of 24 inches, and continuous footings have a minimum width of 18 inches, even if the maximum recommended allowable bearing pressure is not fully utilized. In order to minimize the effects of any slight differential movement that may occur due to variations in the character Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation - Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 10 of the supporting soils and any variations in seasonal moisture contents, it is recommended that all continuous footings be suitably reinforced to make them as rigid as needed. In general, the performance of the foundation system on this site is dependent on the various factors discussed herein. The excavation, preparation, and concreting of foundations should be monitored and tested by a representative of the soils engineer. Floor Slab and Pavement Subarades • Prior to constructing the floor slabs or pavements, and prior to the placement of any fill used to raise grades, the exposed subgrade must be prepared utilizing the proofcompacting and proofrolling procedures described previously. In areas that exhibit soft; yielding or unstable soil conditions, the following remedial measures are recommended to provide a stable subgrade. It must be recognized that the high silt and clay content soils are highly sensitive to increases in moisture and construction disturbance. It will therefore be necessary to maintain these materials in a relatively dry condition to allow for proper subgrade preparation. It is recommended that the proofcompacting and ° proofrolling operations be monitored by a representative of the geotechnical engineer to ensure that a firm, suitable subgrade is subgrade is present prior to placement of new fills, or to construction of floor slabs and pavements. Localized wet, soft or unstable areas can be undercut to such depths determined necessary in the field to reach stable material, and the area backfilled with imported crushed stone, such as the 1 % -inch gradation specified in Section 305 of the WisDOT Standard Specifications, placed compacted as recommended in the Site Preparation section of this report. If relatively thick zones or areas of extensive yielding are observed, and they cannot be stabilized by normal discing, aeration and recompaction procedures, undercutting and replacement with crushed stone and geotextile fabric (if needed) may also be required in these areas. The floor slabs may be designed utilizing an estimated modulus of subgrade reaction of 120 pci based on the presence of silty clay, prepared as discussed in this report. The final design and detailing should be performed by a qualified structural engineer based on the intended slab use, loading conditions and anticipated subgrade conditions. A granular mat, which can be designed as a drainage layer, should be provided below the floor slab. This must be a minimum of six (6) inches in thickness and properly compacted. In moisture sensitive areas, a vapor retarder may be placed beneath the floor slab or base course, however, it is recommended that the architect be consulted in this regard. The proper use of a vapor retarder may not completely prevent moisture beneath or on top of slabs. If the base course contains sharp particles, .a cushion layer of sand approximately 2 inches in thickness may be required to provide protection from puncture. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 11 The floor slabs should be suitably reinforced to make them as rigid as necessary and proper joints provided at the junction of slabs and the foundation system so that a small amount of independent movement can occur without causing damage. Large floor areas must be provided with joints at frequent intervals (maximum spacing of 30 times the slab thickness, per ACI) . to compensate for concrete volume changes (shrinkage). It is recommended that appropriate construction methods and curing procedures be used to minimize shrinkage and curling of the floor slabs. Exterior /Unheated Area Slabs Entry slabs, sidewalks, aprons, and other slabs in exterior or unheated areas may bear upon silty or clayey soils. Such materials are highly frost .susceptible and poorly drained. Slabs placed .. directly upon such soils are subject to heaving and subsequent settlement due to freeze/thaw cycles. This can result in cracking, misalignment, and other related effects, . especially at joints. It is recommended that consideration be given to limited undercutting of the frost susceptible materials to a depth of 1 to 2 feet below the slab, and replacement with well graded, properly placed and compacted granular soils. A properly designed underdrain system connected to the municipal sewer, if permissible, or directed to on -site stormwater management areas should also be incorporated to reduce the potential effects of freeze /thaw cycles. Utility Construction In general, the on -site soils can be used for support of utility lines. However, some undercutting of softened soils, unsuitable fill, or buried topsoil, in conjunction with the placement of crushed stone or other suitable granular backfill may be necessary to establish a stable working mat and /or bearing subgrade. Some difficulty with the stability of utility trenches should be expected. The use of shoring, bracing, or trench boxes will be required. Utility construction should be performed in accordance with "The Standard Specifications for Sewer and Water Line Construction" for the State of Wisconsin. It is recommended that well graded granular soils such as those specified in Tables 37 and 39 of the Standard Specification for Sewer and Water Construction be utilized as backfill in utility trenches to reduce the potential for consolidation and settlement of the backfill. All fill soils should be properly placed and compacted under .engineering controlled conditions to provide suitable support for overlaying structures and roadways. Silty and clayey soils are not recommended for use as backfill within utility trenches due to the substantial difficulty of obtaining proper compaction in confined areas. As with all excavation work, all open cut trenches must be properly shored and braced as required by applicable federal and state OSHA codes, and as necessary to protect life and property. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 12 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Groundwater Control The long term groundwater level in the borings was judged to have been below the depth of the borings at the time of the exploration.. ' On the basis of the observations and the planned finished floor elevation, no major difficulty with groundwater is expected during excavation work on this site. It is expected that filtered sump pumps or other conventional means should suffice to control the groundwater. However, for deeper excavations, or for substantial perched zones, prolonged dewatering with a series of sumps or well points and high capacity sump pumps, or other more comprehensive • means may be necessary to facilitate construction. Since the foundation materials are subject to softening when exposed to free moisture, every effort should be made to keep excavations dry. Discharge water from roof drains should be directed away from the building, and the site grading direct runoff to catch basins, so that the potential for the softening of the foundation and pavement subgrade soils is reduced. While little or no groundwater was encountered at the time the borings were drilled, seasonal variations in precipitation and site drainage conditions can cause groundwater to be present in the upper soils. Excavations and Site Drainage Sloping, shoring or bracing of the excavation sidewalls may be necessary. Trenching in granular soils and fill materials may be difficult due to the instability of vertical slopes, and will therefore require a flattening of trench sides, or some other means of protection, to facilitate construction and to protect life and property. The degree of excavation instability problems is dependent upon the depth and length of time that excavations remain open, excavation bank slopes, water levels and the effectiveness of any dewatering systems. All excavation work must be performed in accordance with OSHA and local building code requirements. Concrete fill was encountered in B -8 between depths of about 7.5 and 13.5 feet (EL. 749.5 to EL. 743:5 +). Substantial difficulty digging can be expected with increasing depth in at least this area. Where excavations encroach upon or extend below the groundwater or perched zones and into fine sand, silt, or soft clay, they may become substantially unstable when the confining effect of the overburden is removed. Significant sloughing or caving of sidewalls may also occur. Some overexcavation of softened or loosened soils, in conjunction with the use of a crushed stone working mat, may be necessary to establish a stable bearing subgrade. Additionally, significantly widened excavations may result, or be required to maintain or achieve sidewall stability. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 13 Since the subgrade soils are generally sensitive to moisture, every effort should be made to provide adequate drainage across the site during construction, and to prevent ponding of runoff on the subgrade. These soils are also subject to erosion caused by runoff, and erosion control measures should be implemented where needed or required by local ordinances. Seismic Design Considerations On -site natural soils generally consist of stiff to very stiff cohesive soils and loose to medium dense granular soils. The on -site natural soils are considered to meet the criteria for Site Class D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code- 2006. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA CONSIDERATIONS As requested by the client, Borings .B -1 though B -3 were performed in the areas of the proposed stormwater management area(s). The subgrade soils encountered in borings B -1 through B -3 have been .classified in general accordance with the USDA textural soil classification system. Estimated infiltration rates for various soil types, are shown. Table 2 of the Site Evaluation for Stormwater Infiltration (1002) document, which is published by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Conservation Practice Standards, is shown below. Soil Texture' Design Infiltration Rate Without Measurement Inches /hour Coarse sand or coarser _(COS) 3.60 Loamy coarse sand (LCOS) 3.60 Sand (S) 3.60 Loamy sand (LS) 1.63 Sandy loam (SL) 0.50 Loam (L) 0.24 Silt loam (Si, L) 0.13 Sandy clay loam (SCL) 0.11 Clay loam (CL) 0.03 Silty Clay loam (Si, CL) 0.04 Sandy clay (SC) 0.04 Silty clay (Si, C) 0.07 Clay (C) 0.07 'Use sandy loam design infiltration for fine sand, loamy fine sand, very fine sand, and loamy fine sand soil textures. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 14 NR -151 guidelines indicate infiltration rates shall be based on the least permeable soil horizon within 5 feet of the bottom elevation of the proposed infiltration system. At the time of this report, the basin design details including type, size, and bottom elevation were not available. The soils encountered below the topsoil in B -1, B -2, and B -3 consist of silty clay and clay loam which have estimated infiltration rates of 0.3 and 0.7 inches per hour, based on Table 2 above. These rates are Tess than 0.6 inches per hour, and such soils are . exempt from the infiltration requirements of NR151.12(5)(c) under NR151:12(5)(c)6a. However, rates can vary significantly across a site, especially where fill materials are present. In -situ infiltration testing is recommended when additional details regarding the basins are known. Care must be exercised in construction of basements in the vicinity of stormwater management basins. If basement floors are below the elevation of basin bottoms, lateral migration of water may result in increased sump pump activity. Granular backfill in utility trenches in the vicinity of stormwater management basins can act as drains, and carry water from basins into nearby basements. Consideration should be given to construction of clay collars around utility lines to prevent movement of water through the free draining backfill. The preceding infiltration rate estimates are intended only for use in preliminary planning. In situ testing, such as with a double ring infiltrometer, along with test pits in other areas of the basins are recommended to allow more detailed evaluation of subsurface conditions, including groundwater levels, and to provide more representative infiltration rates to be used in the final basin design. It is recommended that the bottom of the stormwater management area be observed by qualified geotechnical personnel at the time of construction to verify the soil types. The type of basin and intended use, such as being "wet" or "dry", must be carefully considered when evaluating infiltration rates. It must be recognized that actual infiltration rates will be somewhat variable depending upon the uniformity, in -place density, and /or grading of the subsoils below the individual basin or trench footprint. It should also be recognized that the performance of the basin could be affected by other factors such as densification by construction equipment and sedimentation. A maintenance program must be developed to address the removal of sedimentation and or organic materials should they develop. Additionally, it is recommended that the basin design be performed by an experienced civil engineering firm, and that thorough review of applicable codes (especially NR151) and regulations be performed. Proper design and construction of sidewalls and berms will also be essential for proper basin performance. PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement for this project is understood to consist of a main parking lot for automobiles and drive lanes where truck traffic will be present. Specific traffic loading design details were Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 15 not known at the time of this report. However, for the purpose of this analysis, a projected average daily traffic loading of 5 -18 kip ESALs /day was estimated. The subgrade conditions encountered at the boring locations and silty clay indicated that the . pavement subgrade will generally consist of silty clay and /or new engineered fill used to raise grades where needed. The silty clay soils have . been assigned an _ estimated visual classification of A -6 by the AASHTO soil classification system. These soils are generally rated as poor for pavement subgrade support based on their high shrink -swell potential, high frost susceptibility, low drainage and their high potential to soften when exposed to moisture. They . have a frost index of F -3, a design group index of 14; and a soil support value (SSV) of 4.0. In order to use this value, all new fill used to raise low areas must have pavement. support characteristics that are equal to or better than the existing soils. During construction, the surficial subgrade soils can become wet, softened and disturbed from rainfall and construction equipment. Therefore, prior to placing the pavement base materials, the subgrade must be recompacted and proofrolled. Particular attention should be given to high traffic areas that have become rutted and areas of backfilled trenches.. Localized wet, soft, or unstable areas can be undercut to such depths determined necessary in the field to reach stable materials, and the area backfilled with crushed stone, such as 1 ' or 1 % inch traffic bond (Section 305 of the State of Wisconsin Standard Specification for Highway and Structure Construction). If relatively large or thick zones of extensive yielding are observed, and normal discing and recompaction procedures cannot stabilize them, undercutting and replacement with crushed stone and geotextile fabric (if needed) may also be required in these areas. Preparation of the pavement subgrade must be performed as outlined in the Site Preparation section of this report. In general, a flexible pavement derives its strength from the characteristics of the subgrade soils (or new fills), the base course, and the asphaltic concrete binder and surface mixtures. In view of the anticipated traffic volumes; and subgrade soils for this project, analysis of the proposed pavement and recommended pavement section were based upon a 20 year design life, regional factor of 3.0 and terminal serviceability of 2.0 using the WisDOT flexible pavement design nomographs. The following table the recommended thickness for a flexible pavement structure on :.predominantly silty clay subgrade soils, along with their recommended structural coefficients. The following table presents the recommended thicknesses for the flexible pavement structure, along with the recommended structural coefficients, for pavements constructed on the existing subgrade soils. Circulation Area Wisconsin Pavement And Drives Parking Areas DOT Components (Heavy Duty) (Light Duty) Specifications Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 16 Asphaltic Concrete 1.5" 1.5" Section 460, E- 0.3/E -1* Surface Course (a =0.4) Asphaltic Concrete 3.0" 2.0" Section 460, E- 0.3/E -1* • Binder Course (a =0.44) Aggregate Base 8.0" 8.0" Section 305, 11/4" Crushed Course Stone (a =0.14) *Asphalt mixture type E -1 is recommended for heavy duty applications The asphaltic base and surface course should be placed and provided in . accordance with Section 455/460 of the. State of Wisconsin Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction. The crushed aggregate base course should be provided and placed in accordance with Sec. 301/305 of the. Standard Specification. it may be advantageous to utilize rigid Portland Cement Concrete pavement at entrance and exit aprons. It is recommended that a minimum of 7 inches of 4000 psi, air - entrained concrete (5 to 7 percent) be utilized along with a 6 inch thickness of aggregate base for a rigid pavement section. The construction materials and procedures should be in accordance with Section 415 and Section 304 (for concrete and base course, respectively) of the WDOT Standard Specification. The thickness designs shown above are based on the planned traffic loading; the assumption that all subgrade materials, natural or fill, have minimum strength characteristics equal to or greater than the expected cohesive subgrade; the subgrade being properly prepared; and the pavement being properly drained to prevent softening and erosion of the subgrade. Actual service life will be dependent upon deterioration caused by weather conditions and pavement use. All pavement materials and construction must be in accordance with the guidelines of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for Highway and Bridge construction. If design traffic loading is found to be different from that assumed above; or if the soils encountered at planned subgrade vary from the silty sand existing fill soils; a new pavement section design may be necessary. Periodic pavement maintenance is required to keep a pavement, under normal traffic and environmental conditions, as near as possible to its constructed condition. Maintenance is necessary to reduce the effects of pavement stress caused by changes in temperature and moisture, repetitive traffic loadings, and movement of the subgrade soils. As pavement distress is observed, it should be repaired as quickly as possible. Unrepaired areas will generally lead to more severe and widespread distress, and . eventually, pavement disintegration. Therefore, periodic maintenance consisting of crack sealing, seal coating every 3 to 5.years, and other necessary repairs at least annually, will be required to obtain the design service life. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation and Basin Evaluation Proposed Koeller Street Office Building Oshkosh, Wisconsin MES Project No. 12 -93029 Page 17 The subject site is located in an area that experiences annual freezing cycles and the subgrade soils encountered have been classified as highly susceptible to frost action when free water is present. In order to reduce the potential for frost action, it will be necessary to control surface runoff and water seepage as complete removal and replacement of the frost susceptible subgrade soils is not considered economically feasible. It is recommended that underdrains be placed within the subgrade, just below the granular base; to help reduce the potential for trapping water within the aggregate base layer. At a minimum, this should consist of installing 3 to 4 drain tiles extending radially outward, 20 feet from each interior catch basin. In- addition, drain tiles should extend along curb lines, 20 feet up the slope from curb inlets. The drain tile should be directly connected to the storm sewer manholes or catch basins. The drain tile should consist of 4 inch diameter perforated PVC pipe placed beneath the base layer, extending at least 8 inches into the subgrade. The pipe should be surrounded by 1 inch size clean stone, with the pipe and stone being wrapped with a geotextile filter fabric to reduce the potential of soils from migrating into and obstructing the pipe. It is also recommended that roof drains be connected to the stormwater collection system to minimize the potential for this water to enter the base and subgrade. GENERAL COMMENTS This geotechnical exploration and foundation analysis has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of the foundation conditions on this site. The recommendations presented herein are based on the available soil information and the design information provided. Any changes • in the design information or building locations should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer to determine if modifications in the recommendations are required. The final design plans and specifications should also be reviewed by the soils engineer to determine that the recommendations presented herein have been interpreted and implemented as intended. This geotechnical study has been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care . ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. The findings, recommendations and opinions contained herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted practice in the fields of foundation engineering, soils mechanics, and engineering geology. No other representations, expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this report. It is recommended that the earthwork and foundation operations be monitored by the soils engineer, to test and evaluate the bearing capacities, and the selection, placement and compaction of controlled fills. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. • p I rr O W - W - .J �. ,_, _,. r PROPOSED STORMWATER + MANAGEMENT BASIN —5 I J , � —4 AN: i — — � - 1 FORMER 1 i 1 L ^ HOUSE L.1 LA - z L B-8 — ED i - a m PHASE II in 1 1 PROPOSED 1 CC - z BUILD I — _ — - J - LLJ I J O w O z Y - < - B -1 B -3 ED Lu 1 1 1 3 PROPOSED 3 STORMWATER o_ MANAGEMENT 1 PHASE I BASIN o PROPOSED - 1 . 1 . 1 BUILDING - o f I 1 a - �k x is - B -7 B -6 o 0 410 a fl w SCALE: 1 = 60' G- - � 30' 0 30' 60' SOIL BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM Scale: 1" = 60' NM w MICia Project No: 12 -93029 KOELLER STREET Date: 7/09 m'elresf engineering services, inc. OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN Drawn By: KP ■ i SOIL BORING LOG: B -1 tnidwest enifhleering services, inc. Project: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Wellner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTH/EL VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE - N Qp • Qu MC Peet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 768.4 NO. PM) (ten (tsf) (%) REMARKS _ 2" Aspha6 5 yr. 414 Olive Sandy LOAM with Gravel and Asphalt, -- (FILL), Damp 8 1 757.4 " 2.5 yr. 4/4 Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, (FILL), - - Damp 1 -SS 9 - - . 2 758.4 ` 18 3' 755.4 ` • 4 754.4 2-SS 17 2.5 - 12 — • 6 - 753.4 _ 2.5 yr. 414 Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Damp 6 752.4 3-SS 26 3.5 16 7 751.4 8 750.4 5-SS 30 3.5 - 14 — 9 749.4 ■ 10 748.4 8-SS 22 3.0 - 18 +� 11 747.4 12 ' 748.4_" 7 -SS 21 3.5 - 16 13 745.4 14" 744.4 8-SS 27 3.0 - 19 15 743.4 - •- - END OF BORING 15± FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level ..: Dry v Water Level , a Dry • Caved at , r , p, : 10± feet below ground surface (EL. 748.4 s) Delay Time: N/A - Water Level ; N/A 8 Caved at ,w,,,Q: N/A J. Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between samp9ng intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. rill IC 1 . SOIL BORING LOG: B - 2 midw :en eethig.sei s, Inc . Project: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 • Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Wellner Logged by: Clint Mafinski . DEPT /EL. VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Op Qu MC - REMARKS Imo) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 757.5 NO. (bpf) (tar) (tan MO --I 2 yr. 4/3 Reddish Brown Silty LOAM, (FILL), (TOPSOIL), Dampr 12 1 758.5 5 yr. 5/3 Reddish Brown Clay LOAM, (FILL), Damp - 1-SS 9 2 - - 2 ' 755.5' 26 — 3 - 754.5 . 4 753.5' 2 -SS 14 - - 19 ._ 5 752.5 2.5 yr. 4/4 Reddish Brown Say Clay, Trace Gravel, Damp 8 .. - . 751.5 3-SS 19 3.5 - 18 i — 7 - 750.5 8 749.5 - ^ 5-SS 21 4.0 - 16 — 9 748.5 10 747.3 - �^ 6-SS 23 4.0 - 17 11 - 746.5 12 _ 745.5 7 -SS 23 3.75 - 15 — 13- 744.5 V - 14 - 743.5 - 8-SS 27 - - 20 _ 15 742.5 - - END OF BORING @ 15t FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level...v ache: 13 t feet below ground surface (EL. 744.5 t) _v Water Level w ,,, m „y,r,,,: Dry • Caved at wanda„q.u,n: 6t feet below ground surface (EL. 751.5 t) j Delay Time: N/A - Water Level d,,,,,d: N/A V Caved at, .,,d: N/A Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. SOIL BORING LOG: B - 3 miidv.es.t a agineearing ices, Project: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Wellner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTH/EL VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Qp Qu MC REMARKS (feet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 757.0 NO. (bpi) (tat) (ton (%) r 5 yr. 4/3 Reddish Brown Silty LOAM, (FILL). (TOPSOIL), Damp 22 1 758.0 5 yr. 5/3 Reddish Brown Clay LOAM, (FILL), Damp 1 -SS 10 3.5 - .. 2 755.0 23 _. 4� 753.0 2-SS 12 3.75 - 20 — 5_ 752.0 - • - 2.5 yr. 4/4 Reddish Brown Silly CLAY. Trace Gravel, Damp 8� 751.0 3-SS 17 4.0 - 26 _ 7 - 750.0 - 8 749.0 5-5S 10 2.0 - 18 r. 9 10 747.0 6-SS 29 - - 13 11 746.0 12 - 745.0 7-SS 14 - - 17 _ 13 - 744.0_ 14 - 743.0 8-SS 27 - - 18 _ 15 742.0 END OF BORING g 151 FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level ar as „: Dry v Water Level s , : Dry • Caved at ,, ,, q , 6 ,, : 8± feet below ground surface (EL. 749.0 ±) Delay Time: N/A - Water Level a,,,,,: N/A g Caved at . N/A Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. • • NIS ilk SOIL BORING LOG: B - 4 • d t gine ri g;. serv: es, Inc.. • Project Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 • Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Wellner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTH/EL VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Qp Qu MC REMARKS (feet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 7671 NO. (bpf) (taf) (tsf) (%) Reddish Brown Silty SAND with Gravel, (FILL), Damp 1 - 758.2 _ 1- AS — — — 5 2 - 755.2 3 754.2 - Reddish Brown Silty SAND with Gravel and Clay, (FILL), Damp 2 -SS 13 — — 11 • 4 _ 753.2 5 � 762.2 Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Damp 6= 751.2 3-SS 18 3.0 — 23 7 750.2 8 749.2 4-SS 18 3.5 — 18 9 - 748:2 10 747.2 11 746.2 5-SS 22 4.0 — 15 12 13 744.2 14 - 743.2 8-SS 18 3.5 -- 17 16 - 742.2 END OF BORING 0 15t FEET • • FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level d r Dry Water Level „ Dry • Caved at „ �,„ : 5± feet below ground surface (EL. 752.2i) Delay Time: N/A — Water Lever : N/A K Caved at N/A Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between sot types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. M CI • • SOIL BORING LOG: B - 5 trikiwestertigneering .s i r , inc.. Project: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Wollner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTHIEL. VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION - SAMPLE N Op Qu MC (feet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 757.8 NO. (bP4 (faQ (mil (9G) REMARKS Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel and Sand, (Fill), — — Damp ., 1 756.8 1 -AS - - - 19 — 2 755.8 - - Reddish Bmwii Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, (FILL), Damp -' 3 754.8 — - 2 -SS 14 3.0 - 15 - 4 753.8 5 752.8 _ - - Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Damp "' 6 - 751.8_ 3-SS 32 - - 6 7 750.8 8 749.8 _ _ 4-SS 29 - - 11 9 - 748.8_ 10 - 747.8 l 11 _ - 748.8- 5-SS 17 4.0 - 17 - 12 - 745.8 13 - 744.8 —r 14 743.8 " - &-SS 25 - - 17 15 742.8 - - END OF BORING et 15t FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level ,, Dry v Water Level,,,,,,,,, Dry • Caved at ,,,,,,,,, at feet below ground surface (EL 751.8±) ,I, Delay Tune: N/A - Water Level dft. N/A g Caved at 0,..,4: N/A . Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. • 1 1 1 IC 1 SOIL BORING LOG: B - 6 i t :'iee9i .eerlflg.:SenficPA, ir..lc: . _ 4r Project: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Weliner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTH/EL VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Qp Qu MC (mot) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 758.0 NO. (bpf) PO PI Mr) REMARKS _ - Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel and Sand, (FILL), Damp 1 - 757.0 - 1-AS - - - 17 2 756.0 — . 3 755.0 _ 2-SS 11 . 2.75 - 20 - 4 _ 754.0 " • 5 753.0 Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Damp . _ — 6 - 752.0 3-SS 22 4.0 - 16 7 751.0 _ 8.- 750.0 _ _ 4-SS 28 3.75 - 16 9 _ 749.0 - 10 748.0 - i1^ 747.0= 5-SS 25 4,0 - 17 12 746.0 - — 13 745.0 - 14 " 744.0 - - - - _ _ 6-SS 29 4.0 - 16 15 _" 743.0 - END OF BORING 15t FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level Dry v Water Level, , ,,„ Dry • Caved at , 6± feet below ground surface (EL. 752.0 ±) J. Delay Time: N/A - Water Level : N/A K Caved at �>4r.a: N/A ./ Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling Intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. SOIL BORING LOG: B - 7 mildest a er ... E .. n ::services Inc.. • Protect: Koeller Street Project No.: 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Locadon: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Drilled by: Gary Weliner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTH/EL. VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Op Qu MC REMARKS (feet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 759.5 NO. (bpt) (tsf) (tsf) (%) — 6" Brown Sandy SILT, (TOPSOIL) J 1 758.6 - Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, (FILL), Damp - •• 1-AS - - - 8 2 3 _ 756.6 _ Black SILT, Trace Sand, (Possible BURIED TOPSOIL), (FILL), Damp 2 -86 10 - - 26 4 - 755.6 5 754.5 Reddish Brown CLAY, Trace Gravel, Moist 6- 753.6 3-SS 14 3.5 - 25 7� 752.6 - 8 751.6 Reddish Bra Silty CLAY, Trace Sand, Moist 4-SS 18 1.5 - 16 9 - 750.6 10 749.6 Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Damp 11- 748.6 5-SS 18 3.0 - 15 12 747.6 13 ' 748.6 14 - 745.6_7 8-SS 18 - - 15 15 - 744.6 - END OF BORING la 15t FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level &li Dry v Water Level ,,,,,„„ ,,,: Dry • Caved at r„ " 7± feet below ground surface (EL. 752.6 t) Delay Time: N/A - Water Level N/A y Caved at : N/A { Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. Milk lill C 1.31111 SOIL BORING LOG: B - 8 mtdwest : engIngerIng. : serviPes, Inc. Protect: Koeller Street Project No.: • 12 -93029 Drill Date: June 26, 2009 Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin - Drilled by: Gary Weliner Logged by: Clint Malinski DEPTNIEL. VISUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION SAMPLE N Op Qu MC REMARKS (feet) GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: 757.0 NO. (bpf) (tat) (tsf) (%) _ Reddish Brown My CLAY, Trace Gravel, (FILL), Damp 1, 756.0 .- 1-AS _ - - 17 2 755.0 3 _ " 754.0 _ Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Sand and Gravel, {FILL), Moist 2-SS 4 0.75 - 18 4 - ....' 753.0 ` • 5 - 752.0 ■ g. 6= 751.0_ 3-55 16 0.75 - 18 7 750.0 - 8" 749.0 Concrete FILL 4-SS 5011" - - -" 9 748.0 10 747.0 11 _ 746.0 w 5- SS 7 - - No Recovery - 12 745.0 _ - — - 13 744.0 14 743.o Reddish Brown Silty CLAY, Trace Gravel, Moist - _ _ BSS 14 1.5 - 13 15 - 742.0 — END OF BORING $115t FEET FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Water Level d „ n „ a dd _: Dry v Water Level,,,,,,,, Dry Caved at upon emp.mn: 8t feet below ground surface (EL. 749.0 t) 1 Delay Time: N/A _ Water Level ,,,, N/A a Caved at v ,,.,,, d : WA Note: Lines of stratification represent an approximate boundary between soil types. Variations may occur between sampling intervals and/or boring locations. Transitions may also be gradual. • • GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Visual soil classifications are made in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification ' System on the basis of textural and particle size categorization, and various soil behavior . characteristics. Visual classifications should be substantiated by appropriate laboratory testing when a more exact soil identification is required to satisfy specific project applications criteria. PARTICLE SIZE t . Boulders: 8 inches . Coarse Sand: 2 to 4mm • Silt 0.005 to 0.074mm Cobbles: 3 to 8 inches Medium Sand: 0.42 to 2mm Clay: - 0.005mm Gravel: 5mm to 3 inches Fine Sand: • 0.074 to 0.42mm • • DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS SS: Split - spoon, 2' O.D. by 1 3/8" 1.D. ST: Shelby Tuba, 2" O.D. or 3' O.D., as noted in text RB: Roller Bit AU: Auger Sample WS: Wash Sample • DB: Diamond Bit BS: Bag Sample CB: Carbide Bit HA: Hand Auger SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS N: • Standard penetration count, indicating number of blows of a 140 Ib. Hammer with a 30 inch drop, required to advance a split -spoon sampler one foot. • Qu: Unconfined compressive strength, tons per square foot (tsf) Qp: Calibrated hand penetrometer resistance, tsf • MC: Moisture Content, % LL Liquid Limit PL: Plastic Limit PI: Plasticity Index Dd: Dry Density, pounds per cubic foot (pcf) PID: Photoionization Detector (Hnu meter) volatile vapor level, ppm SOIL RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION NON- COHESIVE SOI LS COHESIVE SOILS . • Classifier N-Value Range Classifier Qu Range (tsf) N -Value Range • Very loose 0 - 3 Very soft 0 — 0.25 0 - 2 • Loose 3 -7 . Soft . 0.25 -0.5 2 -5 Medium dense 7 -15 Medium stiff 0.5 —1.0 5 —10 Dense 15 - 38 Stiff 1.0 — 2.0 10 -14 Very dense • 38 + Very stiff 2.0 — 4.0 14 - 32 • Hard 4.0 + 32 + • GROUNDWATER , Approximate Groundwater level at time noted on soil baring log, measured in open bore hole unless otherwise noted. Groundwater levels often vary with time, and are affected by soil permeability characteristics, weather conditions, and lateral damage conditions. • • Safety and Buildings commerce.wl.gov 2331 SAN LUIS PL STE 150 GREEN BAY WI 54304 Contact Through Relay i sco ns i n www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ Department of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary September 16, 2009 CUST ID No. 260804 A777V Buildings & Structures Building Inspector STEPHEN GRIES BUILDING INSPECTION GRIES ARCHITECTURAL GROUP INC CITY OF OSHKOSH 500 N COMMERCIAL ST POB 1130 NEENAH WI 54956 OSHKOSH WI 54902 (Please forward a copy of this letter to the fire department conducting inspections of this project.) CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/11/2011 - 4ardi . siG Transaction ID No. 1707376 SITE: Site ID No. 612730 Koeller Street III PI . I�td Q affical:rnnukbe, 524NKoeller " arse• 3.q 7' _ ate City of Oshkosh, 54901 Facility: 612730 KOELLER STREET III 524 N KOELLER OSHKOSH 54901 Object Type: Truss, Roof Regulated Object ID No.: 1240945 Code Applies Date: 09/09/09 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. Only those object types listed above have been approved; other submittals such as plumbing and those listed below under Also Submit, may be required. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: Also Address • IBC 2303.4.1.5 - The bracing of wood trusses shall comply to their appropriate engineered design. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installation/operation. Any local requirements shall be complied with. This plan has not been generally reviewed for compliance with fire code requirements, including those for fire lanes and fire protection water supply, so contact the local fire department for further information. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 7 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. You will need to either file the NOI and an erosion control plan summary on -line at www.commerce.wi.gov /sb or submit a completed NOI form and either a plan summary or complete plan to us, with additional fees, or to the certified municipality. STEPHEN GRIES Page 2 9/16/2009 In granting this approval, the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions, should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. The Division does not take responsibility for the design or construction of the reviewed items. Per s. Comm 61.40(4), projects for buildings of over 50,000 cubic feet total volume shall have supervising professionals who file compliance statements with this agency and the local code officials prior to occupancy of the project. The compliance statement form is available on our website, www.commerce.wi.gov /sb under forms for commercial buildings. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Donald L Diedrick Plan Reviewer , Integrated Services 4, ' " , • , (920)492 -5606 , M -TH 6:30 am - 4:00 pm, Fri a.m. Only don.diedrick@wisconsin.gov cc: John R Anderson, State Building Inspector, (715) 823 -2014 , Monday,7:45A.M.- 4:30P.M. Andy Dumke, Dumke & Associates Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs any building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www. commerce. wi. gov/ SB/ SB- BuildingContractorProgram.html Note: Your project may be eligible for free technical assistance and financial incentives from Focus on Energy if you incorporate renewable energy and/or higher efficiency HVAC or lighting systems into your building. For more information about Focus on Energy's New Construction Program, call (800) 762 -7077 or visit http: / /www. focusonenergy. com/Business/New- Business- Construction/ Safety and Buildings commerce.wi.gov 2331 SAN LUIS PL STE 150 GREEN BAY WI 54304 Contact Through Relay tisconsin www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ Department of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary September 16, 2009 CUST ID No. 259120 ATTN.: Buildings & Structures Building Inspector ARTHUR WARREN CONDON TOTAL COMFORT INC BUILDING INSPECTION 11 BLACKBURN ST CITY OF OSHKOSH PO BOX 184 POB 1130 RIPON WI 54971 OSHKOSH WI 54902 (Please forward a copy of this letter to the fire department conducting inspections of this project.) CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 09/16/2010 ` - -- c °�'� Transaction ID No. 1706838 SITE Site ID No. 612730 Koeller Street III w 47 de-41 524 N Koeller above,*41I City of Oshkosh, 54901 ` ' FOR: Facility: 612730 KOELLER STREET III 524 N KOELLER OSHKOSH 54901 Tenant Name or Addn /Alt Description: Schenck Tenant Alteration Object Type: HVAC ICC System Regulated Object ID No.: 1240696 Code Applies Date: 09/08/09 5,022 sq ft Area Heated The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. Only those object types listed above have been approved; other submittals such as plumbing and those listed below under Also Submit, may be required. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: Reminders • IMC 1101 /Comm 64.1101 Air conditioning systems shall be constructed and installed in compliance with the standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, as adopted under Comm 45. • IMC 606 Provide a duct smoke detection system in new duct systems, with appropriate controls, unless (1) the return air rate is 2,000 cfm or less (See balancing report Comm 64.0313), OR (2) the air distribution system is incapable of spreading smoke beyond the enclosing walls, floor and ceiling of the room or space in which the smoke is generated. The smoke detection system shall shut down the air distribution system upon activation. Smoke detectors shall be connected to a fire alarm system. The activation of a smoke detector shall activate a visible and audible supervisory signal at a constantly attended location unless exceptions are met. The detectors shall be located in the return duct. By definition in IMC 202, an air distribution system consists of "...air- handling equipment that circulates air within a space or spaces and includes systems made up of one or more air - handling units." Multiple systems shall have their return air added aggregately for any one space when determining application of the 2,000 cfm return air criteria. ARTHUR WARREN Page 2 9/16/2009 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installation/operation. Any local requirements shall be complied with. This plan has not been generally reviewed for compliance with fire code requirements, including those for fire lanes and fire protection water supply, so contact the local fire department for further information. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 7 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. You will need to either file the NOI and an erosion control plan summary on -line at www.commerce.wi.gov /sb or submit a completed NOI form and either a plan summary or complete plan to us, with additional fees, or to the certified municipality. In granting this approval, the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions, should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. The Division does not take responsibility for the design or construction of the reviewed items. Per s. Comm 61.40(4), projects for buildings of over 50,000 cubic feet total volume shall have supervising professionals who file compliance statements with this agency and the local code officials prior to occupancy of the project. The compliance statement form is available on our website, www.commerce.wi.gov /sb under forms for commercial buildings. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 400.00 Fee Received $ 400.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Donald L Diedrick Plan Reviewer , Integrated Services , 'm (920)492 -5606 , M -TH 6:30 am - 4:00 pm, Fri a.m. Only don.diedrick@wisconsin.gov cc: John R Anderson, State Building Inspector, (715) 823 -2014 , Monday,7:45A.M.- 4:30P.M. Andy Dumke, Dumke & Associates Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs any building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www.commerce.wi. gov/ SB/ SB- BuildingContractorProgram.html Note: Your project may be eligible for free technical assistance and financial incentives from Focus on Energy if you incorporate renewable energy and/or higher efficiency HVAC or lighting systems into your building. For more information about Focus on Energy's New Construction Program, call (800) 762 -7077 or visit http: / /www. focusonenergy. com/Business/New- Business- Construction/ Safety and Buildings commerce.wi.goV 2331 SAN LUIS PL STE 150 GREEN BAY WI 54304 Contact Through Relay i s c o n s i n www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ Department of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary November 04, 2009 CUST ID No. 260075 ATTN:• Buildings & Structures Building Inspector BRUCE E COTTRELL BUILDING INSPECTION COTTRELL DESIGN CITY OF OSHKOSH 1500 TEMPLE MORE LN POB 1130 GREEN BAY WI 54313 OSHKOSH WI 54902 (Please forward a copy of this letter to the fire • department conducting inspections of this project.) CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/11/2011 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1732828 SITE Site ID No. 612730 Koeller Street III Please refer to both identification numbers, 524 N Koeller above, in all correspondence with the agency. City of Oshkosh, 54901 FOR: Facility: 612730 KOELLER STREET III 524 N KOELLER OSHKOSH 54901 Tenant Name or Addn/Alt Description: Schenck Tenant Alteration Object Type: Lighting Regulated Object ID No.: 1246674 Code Applies Date: 10/22/09 8.6 KW lighting load The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. Only those object types listed above have been approved; other submittals such as plumbing and those listed below under Also Submit, may be required. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: NONE A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installation/operation. Any local requirements shall be complied with. This plan has not been generally reviewed for compliance with fire code requirements, including those for fire lanes and fire protection water supply, so contact the local fire department for further information. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 7 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. You will need to either file the NOI and an erosion control plan summary on -line at www.commerce.wi.gov /sb or submit a completed NOI form and either a plan summary or complete plan to us, with additional fees, or to the certified municipality. In granting this approval, the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions, should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this Z/10 BRUCE E COTTRELL Page 2 11/4/2009 review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. The Division does not take responsibility for the design or construction of the reviewed items. Per s. Comm 61.40(4), projects for buildings of over 50,000 cubic feet total volume shall have supervising professionals who file compliance statements with this agency and the local code officials prior to occupancy of the project. The compliance statement form is available on our website, www.commerce.wi.gov /sb under forms for commercial buildings. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. l y' Fee Required $ 175.00 This Amount Will Be Invoiced. i When You Receive That Invoice, • onald L Diedrick Please Include a Copy With Your Plan Reviewer , Integrated Services Payment Submittal. (920)492 -5606 , M -TH 6:30 am - 4:00 pm, Fri a.m. Only WiSMART code: 7648 don.diedrick@wisconsin.gov cc: John R Anderson, State Building Inspector, (715) 823 -2014 , Monday,7:45A.M.- 4:30P.M. Stephen Gries , Gries Architectural Group Inc Andy Dumke, Dumke & Associates Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs any building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www. commerce. wi. gov/ SB/ SB- BuildingContractorProgram.html Note: Your project may be eligible for free technical assistance and financial incentives from Focus on Energy if you incorporate renewable energy and/or higher efficiency HVAC or lighting systems into your building. For more information about Focus on Energy's New Construction Program, call (800) 762 -7077 or visit http: / /www.focusonenergy. com/Business/New- Business - Construction/ ELECTRICAL LEGEND: FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE SEE FIXTURE SCHEDULE DOR DETAILS ® RECESSED FIXTURE, EIT14ER FLUORESENT, HID, OR INCANDESCETIT. SEE FIXTURE SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS FIXTURE SCHEDULE CEILMG MOUNT FIXTURE. SEE FIXTURE 10, SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS. \(� U14LL MOUNT FIXTURE. SEE FIXTURE M SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS. $ SINGLE POLE SWITCH MW 48' AFF. $o OCCUPANCY SENSOR NOVITAS CAT 9I -211 MOUNT 46' AFF. ® OCCUPANCY SENSOR NOVITAS CAT 0 01 -083 MOUNT AS NEAR TO CENTER OF ROOM AS POSSIBLE CONS * : BRUCE E. : >� COTTRELL •. 970 -007 _ Green Bay, : i WI • 6/Zzlo COTTRELL DESIGN, INC. u;. I. FIXTURE TO HAVE ELECTRONIC BALLASTS) W/ TWO RATING OF LESS THAN 101, AND AP'PROPREIATE LAMPS. 2. REFER TO DRAWING E -01 FOR LOCATIONS OF EXIT AND E "lERSENCY LIGHT FIXTURES. 1500 TEMPLE MORE LANE GREEN BAY, WI 54313 TELEPHONE 920 -490 -9415 FAX 920 -490 -9421 ELECTRICAL DESIGN /CONSULTING SERVICE 501 N. KOELLER ST. OSHKOSH, WI PROPOSED EM LIGHTING CALCULATIONS Nmow MLKOTR /C SUADAWLY 2431 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE NEENAH, WI 54956 120) 729 -4500, (920) 729 -4492 FAX WWW.WERNERELE DRAWN BY BEC JOB NO: 100409 DATE: 10/21/09 SCALE 3/16 -- i' -0" SHEET: E -02 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE LAMP" / GAT! DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER CATALOG NO. DIFFUSER FINISH MOUNTING NOTES A (3) F32T8/A0VS41 /ALT0 RECESSED INDIRECT METALUX 2RO 332RP -UNV - I5U11.E. RECESSED I 8 (3) F32TS/A0V841 /ALT0 LAY IN TROFFER METALUX 2GM332A -UNV ACRYLIC BIUz. RECESSED I C (U 65BR30FL RECESSED CAN HALO WlIIC4T /310W - B.W.E. RECESSED I XE W/UNIT EXIT WBATTERY 1 HEADS DUAL LITE HCXURW - WHITE UNIVERSAL 2 E WA NIT E EWSENCY W/BATTERY DUAL LITE LZ2 - I WHITE I WALL 2 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE NOTES: I. FIXTURE TO HAVE ELECTRONIC BALLASTS) W/ TWO RATING OF LESS THAN 101, AND AP'PROPREIATE LAMPS. 2. REFER TO DRAWING E -01 FOR LOCATIONS OF EXIT AND E "lERSENCY LIGHT FIXTURES. 1500 TEMPLE MORE LANE GREEN BAY, WI 54313 TELEPHONE 920 -490 -9415 FAX 920 -490 -9421 ELECTRICAL DESIGN /CONSULTING SERVICE 501 N. KOELLER ST. OSHKOSH, WI PROPOSED EM LIGHTING CALCULATIONS Nmow MLKOTR /C SUADAWLY 2431 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE NEENAH, WI 54956 120) 729 -4500, (920) 729 -4492 FAX WWW.WERNERELE DRAWN BY BEC JOB NO: 100409 DATE: 10/21/09 SCALE 3/16 -- i' -0" SHEET: E -02