HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-210JUNE 22, 2010
10 -210 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 6 -1 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
VOCATIONAL SCHOOL FOR FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL
COLLEGE ON POBEREZNY ROAD, BETWEEN WEST
RIPPLE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD N, NORTH OF 4300
POBEREZNY ROAD
INITIATED BY: KELLER INC., PETITIONER
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w /conditions
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a
conditional use permit for a planned development to construct a vocational school for
Fox Valley Technical College, per the attached, is hereby approved with the following
conditions:
1) Base standard modification to allow a zero foot setback for proposed shared
driveway.
2) Parking lot to be located entirely outside of the required 25 foot front yard
setback area.
3) Interior landscape islands are included on final plan submittal.
4) Fire lane is provided on the north side of the proposed building.
5) Future pedestrian walk leading to public right -of -way is indicated on final plans.
6) Overhead door on north elevation is removed unless vehicular access is
provided to the door.
A
.IHK 1H
ON THE WATER
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Darryn Burich/�j
Director of Planning Services
DATE: June 17, 2010
RE: Approve Conditional Use Permit; Planned Development for Construction of a
Vocational School for Fox Valley Technical College on Poberezny Road, Between
West Ripple Road and County Road N, North of 4300 Poberezny Road (Plan
Commission Recommends Approval)
(The petitioner's are requesting to waive the 2 °a reading of the Poberezny Annexation and take action
on the annexation ordinance at the June 22, 2010 Council meeting that will permit action to be taken
on this request. Should the rules not be waived, this item will be addressed at the Council meeting
where the annexation ordinance is adopted. Should the annexation not be adopted, the item will be
withdrawn.)
BACKGROUND
The approximate 24 acre property is currently located within the Town of Nekimi but is one of seven
properties (approximately 163.66 acres of land) requesting a direct annexation by unanimous approval.
They are requesting a permanent zoning designation of M -1PD which is consistent with the overall
recommended land use for the area and the existing zoning to the west along the Washburn Street
frontage road. The Planned Development designation allows review of all new development in the
corridor.
ANAINSiS
The request is for the construction of an approximately 26,000 square foot building for a vocational
school for advanced manufacturing processing, which consists of welding booths, computer
classrooms, research/development centers, laboratories and a lunch room. The school is anticipated to
have between 50 -100 occupants /visitors daily. The building is proposed to be located at the southwest
corner of the property within the required setbacks. The north elevation includes an overhead door
which is recommended to be removed as it appears to not serve any vehicular purpose. Proposed
access to the site will be made via a shared driveway with the Veterans' Museum, under construction
to the south, which will require a base standard modification to allow a zero -foot setback. The
proposed parking lot will accommodate 55 vehicles and staff is recommending that it be reconfigured
as it is currently located 15 feet inside the 25 -foot front yard setback. No lighting plans, signage, or
stormwater management and landscaping plans have been submitted at this time but will be required to
meet code standards. Pedestrian access walks will eventually be required and the Fire Department has
requested the addition of a fire lane on the final plans to access the north side of the building.
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission approved of this request at its June 15, 2010 meeting.
Approved,
Crty Manager
ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A VOCATIONAL SCHOOL ON PROPERTY
DIRECTLY NORTH OF 4300 POBEREZNY ROAD
Plan Commission meeting of June 15, 2010
GENERAL INFORMATION
Petitioner:
Property Owner:
Actions Requested:
Keller, Inc.
Schwab Properties
The petitioner requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit and approval of a Development
Plan for the development of a vocational school on a greenfield site located north of 4300
Poberezny Road, currently included in a direct annexation request to the City of Oshkosh from
the Town of Nekimi.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Vocational schools are permitted only as a Conditional Use within the proposed M -1 Light
Industrial District and the site is governed by the proposed Planned Development Overlay zoning
designation, requiring Development Plan approval for the schools development. The Zoning
Ordinance establishes criteria and guidelines for the establishment and /or amendment of a PD
overlay district in Section 30 -33 and Conditional Use Permit in Section 30 -11.
Property Location and Type:
The approximate 24 acre property is currently located within the Town of Nekimi but is one of
seven properties (approximately 163.66 acres of land) requesting a direct annexation by
unanimous approval. They are requesting a permanent zoning designation of M -1PD which is
consistent with the overall recommended land use for the area and the existing zoning to the west
along the Washburn Street frontage road. The Planned Development designation allows review
of all new development in the corridor.
C ■■hin�+ Cita
Existin Land Use
Zonin
Undeveloped Agricultural Land
County B -3 /Proposed
City M -1 PD
Adjacent Land Use and Zonin
Existing Uses Zoning
County B -3 /Proposed
North General Commercial — Retail & Service City M -1 PD
.............._.........................___...._...................................................................._.........__..............................__-....._.. .........................._..._ ...................................................._.................................................._ ......_........................
South . Veterans Museum County P -1
.........._.__. ._ ............. .. . _
............ _.............................._..... _._.............. . _ _
........................................................................._ _ _
......................................................................................................................... .... ................... .... _ ...............................................
...
EastUndeveloped Agricultural Land ..................................................._._.................. ........................ ...._ County.. P.-. 1.........._ . ... ..... ... ... ........... ..............
_.....
West STH "41 41 N/A
I
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation
Land Use
10 Year Land Use Recommendation
Industrial
20 Year Land Use Recommendation
Industrial
ANALYSIS
Use
This request involves the construction of an approximately 26,000 square foot building for a
vocational school for advanced manufacturing processing, which consists of welding booths,
computer classrooms, research/development centers, laboratories and a lunch room. It is
anticipated that the school will have between 50 -100 occupants /visitors daily.
The proposed use of a vocational school may not be a traditional use found within the Highway
41 commercial corridor; however, that does not mean it is not a compatible and harmonious one.
As stated in the application, this location is highly visible and has good access to Highway 41.
The establishment of the school at this location is also advantageous as there is plenty of room
for future expansion (not included in this request) and may act as a catalyst to spur additional
development along the east frontage road of Highway 41.
Site Design
The proposed 26,000 square foot building will contain areas typically found at establishments of
higher education including classrooms, commons, offices and welding, fabrication, metallurgical
and computer labs. The building itself is located at the southwest corner of the property and
setback 176 feet from the front property line, exceeding the 50 foot minimum requirement. The
proposed south side yard setback is shown at 115 feet, again exceeding the 15 foot minimum
requirement.
Building Design
Architecturally, the front (west) fagade consists of a 3' -4" split face knee wall under an
additional 8' -8" masonry split block section. The remaining 11' -8" to the roof line will consist
of an EFIS wall covering with a number of architectural elements to break up the expanse. The
west elevation also possesses numerous windows to offer natural lighting to the classrooms,
offices and commons and breaks up the fagade nicely.
The knee wall wraps around to and throughout the south and north facades and incorporates
sections of architectural steel panels broken up by split face block columns to the roof line. The
north facade also contains a large number of windows and a continuation of split face block and
EFIS material.
The north elevation includes an overhead door which does not lead to any proposed paved area.
Staff recommends removing this door as it appears it will not serve any vehicular purpose and is
not incorporated into future expansion plans.
The rear (east) fagade is proposed to be entirely made up of architectural steel panel with no
masonry elements. Staff is recommending that the knee wall and vertical elements be continued
in a similar fashion as the north and south elevations to meet the minimum requirements of the
U.S.H. 41 Corridor architectural standards which prohibits all -metal facades.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
Access /Parking
Proposed access to the site will be made via a shared driveway with the Veterans' Museum
(under construction) to the south. The proposed ingress /egress appears to meet the minimum
requirements of the Access Control Ordinance in regard to size. The shared driveway does have
a zero -foot setback where a 15 -foot setback is required, but staff is supportive of a base standard
modification to allow the zero -foot setback as proposed. The plans indicate that the proposed
parking lot will accommodate 55 vehicles including two handicap stalls and meets the minimum
parking requirements. The parking lot is shown to be 15 feet inside the 25 -foot front yard
setback. Staff is recommending that the lot be reconfigured so that the parking lot is outside of
the setback area and does not support a base standard modification. The proposed parking lot
also lacks required interior landscape islands and staff recommends the minimum amount of
islands be included on the final site plan prior to approval.
Staff would also point out that a future pedestrian access walk leading to public right -of -way be
indicated on the final plan for the eventual construction of a public sidewalk along Poberezny
Road.
The Oshkosh Fire Department has reviewed the proposed site plan and is requesting that a fire
lane to access the north side of the building be included on the final plan.
Lightin
No lighting plan has been submitted but will be required to meet code standards.
Si na e
No formal signage plans have been submitted. The west elevation does include wall signage and
appears to meet code requirements. Any proposed ground signage will have to meet code
standards of the Sign Ordinance and U.S.H. 41 Corridor Overlay standards. (ground signs less
than 60 feet tall, 1,600 square feet and wall signs less than 30% of fagade area)
Erosion Control and Landscaping
No erosion control and landscape plan have been submitted with the application but landscaping
will need to meet code standards.
Stormwater Management
Stormwater plans must meet minimum standards required by the Department of Public Works.
RECOMMENDATION /CONDITIONS
Staff believes that the proposed development, with conditions, will meet the standards as set
forth in Section 30 -11: Conditional Use Permits as well as Section 30 -33: Planned Developments
and not have a negative impact on surrounding lands, will be harmonious with the intended
character of the general vicinity, and will not be detrimental to neighboring property or the
community as a whole.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit/development plan with the following
conditions:
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
I- East fagade include architectural elements including knee wall and vertical split faced
block columns, similar to the north and south facades.
2- Base standard modification to allow a zero -foot setback for proposed shared
driveway.
3- Parking lot to be located entirely outside of the required 25 -foot front yard setback
area.
4- Interior landscape islands are included on final plan submittal.
5- Fire lane is provided on the north side of the proposed building.
6- Future pedestrian walk leading to public right -of -way is indicated on final plans.
7- Overhead door on north elevation is removed unless vehicular access is provided to
the door.
The Plan Commission approved of the conditional use permit/planned development as requested
with revised conditions. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Mr. Nau presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area. He stated that if the
annexation request is approved, the zoning designation would be M -1PD for this area. He
reviewed the site plan and proposed use on the 24 acre parcel and explained that the use may be
expanded in the future. He also commented that the development had potential to spur more
action along the Highway 41 corridor and reviewed the proposed building features and parking
lot. The parking lot is recommended to be redesigned and relocated as it currently is shown to be
15 feet inside the 25 -foot front yard setback area but it does meet minimum parking
requirements. He also reviewed the building elevations and stated that a pedestrian walk is
recommended to be installed at such a time when sidewalks would be available on Poberezny
Road. He also commented that the Fire Department has requested that a fire lane is provided on
the north side of the proposed building and staff is recommending that the overhead access door
shown on the site plans be removed or incorporated into some type of vehicular access.
Lighting, signage, landscaping, and stormwater management plans have not yet been submitted
and will be required to be approved prior to building permits being issued. He also discussed the
shared driveway proposed with the Veterans' Museum currently under construction which would
require a base standard modification for a zero -foot setback and reviewed the conditions
recommended for this request.
Mr. Hinz questioned if the purpose of the overhead door was known.
Mr. Nau replied negatively and stated that a narrative was not included with this request.
Mr. Thoms inquired why a shared driveway was being proposed and if the building could be
moved back instead.
Mr. Burich responded that the Veterans' Museum was developed with the concept that additional
development would occur to the north of the site and clarified that the zero -foot setback referred
to in the staff report was for the driveway only and had no affect on the setback for the building
itself.
Mr. Thoms also inquired if the Veterans' Museum was agreeable to the shared driveway concept.
Mr. Nau replied that they found it acceptable.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
Mr. Thorns then questioned why the parking lot was located in front of the building facing the
road as it would be more aesthetically pleasing to locate the parking lot behind the facility.
Mr. Burich responded that the City has no design standards that require this concept to be
enforced however the Commission could recommend that the parking area be relocated for
aesthetic purposes.
Mr. Palmeri inquired if there was any public transportation that would reach this site.
Mr. Burich replied that Chris Strong, the Director of Transportation, did not express any
concerns regarding the matter when the site plans were reviewed.
Mr. Palmeri commented that he did not feel that a school should be developed on a site that did
not have public transportation available to it. He also commented that the proposed site plan did
not come close to criteria suggested in the Vision Oshkosh document. He felt that there was
available space in the city that could be utilized for this project rather than constructing a new
building in this area.
Ms. Lohry questioned why we are allowing a shared driveway between the properties and
suggested that a road be installed between the developments instead that could service future
development to the east.
Mr. Burich responded that there would not be development to the east that would be accessed
from Poberezny Road. There is a navigable waterway in this area that would prevent
development in some locations and from an efficiency standpoint; any development on the east
side would be accessed from Waupun Road.
Mr. Borsuk stated that the Vision Oshkosh document was non - binding and he felt that
development such as this project that meets current standards should be welcomed and that if
recommendations in the Vision Oshkosh report are to be considered when reviewing
developments, it should be incorporated into City ordinance and applied to all developments
equally. He questioned what the use for the school would be considered.
Mr. Burich replied that the school use is institutional however there is not a zoning designation
for such use.
Mr. Buck added that the vocational school is on leased property and could cease to exist in time
and the underlying zoning classification of the M -1PD would allow light industrial or
commercial use and could be adapted to other uses without any change to the zoning
classification.
Ms. Lohry inquired if the site was to be used for a school, did that mean that it would be a tax
exempt property.
Mr. Burich responded that since the property is leased, it will be on the tax roll and would not be
considered exempt.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
Mr. St. Peter stated that the Veterans' Museum's deed dated June 24, 2008 included a statement
that the grantee consents to annexation to the City when adjacent properties are annexed. He
also commented that the developer is apparently present and still has not spoken about their
proj ect.
Mr. Bowen inquired if the Town was objecting to the proposed use.
Mr. St. Peter replied that they did not.
Deborah Heath, Dean of Transportation and Construction Technology for Fox Valley Technical
College, stated that she has been working on the project since its conception and that they have
been looking at expanding their welding training facilities for the past few years and already
have a leased building in the city. The project went up for bids and the college has reviewed 8-
10 proposals and the selection process was very specific. They wished to move into the new
facility by October of 2010 and considered visibility, access, and cost effectiveness to base their
decision on a site which the chosen location was Poberezny Road. She further stated that they
did not feel that bus lines to the facility were necessary at this time as their other facility on
Spanbauer Road is not accessible by bus service and has not had an effect on attendance as they
currently have 200 students at that site. Their plans were to lease the facility for ten years and
the development would be operating with a well and holding tank until such time that City water
and sewer services would be installed in the area.
Ms. Propp questioned if FVTC was also considering the site at 1200 South Koeller Street as an
alternate location if this site did not work out.
Ms. Heath responded that FVTC rejected this site's proposal in the bid process and was not
considering it as an alternative location at this time.
Mr. Borsuk inquired if they would consider it as a second choice if the Poberezny Road site was
not approved.
Ms. Heath replied that the Poberezny Road site was their selected site in the bid process and if it
did not receive approval, FVTC would possibly have to go back out for bids again before
selecting an alternate location.
Dennis Schwab, 601 Oregon Street, stated that his agency was the developer for the site and that
the parcel would be a taxable entity. He further commented that they were in a position to agree
to all conditions recommended for this request and that he felt this development would open up
the corridor for additional developments. He felt that it would create a good tax base for the City
and was a natural growth pattern and beneficial for the community.
Ms. Lohry questioned if the land not included in the development would be kept in a state of
natural habitat.
Mr. Schwab responded that he was not the owner of the land in question.
Richard Gabert, owner of the land, stated that it would be left as agricultural use.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
Mr. Thorns stated that he felt the Vision Oshkosh report was relevant and that the parking lot
should not be as visible with its location in the front of the structure and questioned if its location
could be moved to the rear of the site.
Mr. Schwab replied that he would have to discuss the issue with FVTC but he felt that the
development as proposed was not any different than other sites that currently exist on the
frontage road.
Mr. Thorns stated that this would be a planned development area and he did not feel that we
should continue to allow projects to be developed as ones previously done just because they
already exist.
Mr. Schwab responded that he did not feel it was appropriate to expect their development to
adhere to different standards than other projects that were previously developed.
Ron Metz, representing the Veterans' Museum, stated that they did not have any objections to
this development and he was satisfied with the 25 -foot setback for the parking lot in front of the
structure. He further stated that their property would be an island remaining in the Town and he
was hoping to be a good neighbor with the adjacent development.
Kip Golden of Keller, Inc., N216 State Road 55, Kaukauna, stated that their time frame for this
development was very tight as they would only have three months to build this project. He
further stated that they came up with different designs for the development and could move the
parking lot out of the setback area. The landscape islands in the parking lot, the fire lane, and
pedestrian access included in the conditions would not be a problem and the overhead door
included in the elevation plans was a mistake. He displayed revised elevation plans which
included the removal of the overhead door with the addition of windows and EFIS on other sides
of the structure but they did not desire to meet the first condition recommended for this request
to add architectural elements to the east facade as that was the area proposed for future expansion
and was not visible from the roadway. He also commented that it was not technically a "green
building" but would be utilizing 75% recycled steel for the structure with lighting and HVAC
elements of high efficiency and ADA approved throughout the building.
Mr. Vajgrt inquired where the parking stalls that were located in the setback would be placed.
Mr. Golden responded that they would leave the layout of the parking lot as presented and move
the structure back to provide the additional area to meet the 25 -foot setback requirement. They
did not wish to place parking stalls behind the structure as that area was going to possibly be
used for future expansion of the building.
Mr. Poberezny commented that he thought today's action was to consider the annexation of the
property only and it appeared that the development on the site was already designed.
Mr. Bowen stated that the Vision Oshkosh report assists the Commission in making decisions
that would provide the community with elements of development that they desire to see and
those large parking lots that create a sea of asphalt are not a good development pattern to
continue. He did not feel that this parking lot layout was that objectionable other than it needs to
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
be relocated out of the setback area and he did not see that the opinions of the Vision Oshkosh
report would prevent this development from receiving the necessary approval.
Mr. Borsuk commented that he understood the community's desire for higher design standards
for development but the Commission needs to consider these desires in an appropriate context
and he felt that this was still a positive project.
Mr. Palmeri stated that if the Commission approved of this development in its current form, the
Vision Oshkosh report is meaningless and quoted excerpts from said report. He further
commented that it appeared to be a big box structure that does not come close to the expectations
in the Vision Oshkosh report and he did not agree with the opinion of FVTC that bus services to
the location were not important as we should be considering the citizen's needs. He also felt that
we should be encouraging the reuse of available spaces as both the Vision Oshkosh report and
the Comprehensive Plan designate this as important criteria for development.
Mr. Thorns stated that the City's ordinance and design standards should support the elements of
the Comprehensive Plan and it does not and it seems that we continue to go down the path of
approving developments as they are in line with what was always acceptable in the past. He felt
that the elements of the Vision Oshkosh report and the Comprehensive Plan should be
considered when reviewing proposed developments and the practice of continuing to address
each request as a single item should cease.
Ms. Propp commented that she did not feel that applying higher standards to this development
would be fair to FVTC and that some of the issues being brought up were items that would be
more appropriate to discuss during the joint workshop with the Common Council scheduled after
today's meeting.
Mr. Monte stated that he did not feel it was necessary to require the east fagade to include
architectural elements similar to the north and south facades as the petitioner had clarified that
those elements were not present due to the future expansion plans in that area and its lack of
visibility to the public should not detract from the development.
Motion by Monte to amend the conditions recommended for this request to remove
condition #1 to include architectural elements on the east facade of the structure.
Seconded by Borsuk Motion carried 7 -2. Ayes -
Borsuk/BowenIFojtik/Hinz /Palmeri /Monte/
Nollenberger. Nays - Thoms / Propp.
Motion by Monte to approve the conditional use permit /development plan for the
establishment of a vocational school on property directly north of 4300 Poberezny Road
as requested with the following conditions:
I- Base standard modification to allow a zero foot setback for proposed shared
driveway.
2- Parking lot to be located entirely outside of the required 25 foot front yard setback
area.
3- Interior landscape islands are included on final plan submittal.
4- Fire lane is provided on the north side of the proposed building.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
5- Future pedestrian walk leading to public right -of -way is indicated on final plans.
6- Overhead door on north elevation is removed unless vehicular access is provided to
the door.
Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 7 -2. Ayes -
Bors ukIBowen/Foj tik/Hinz/Propp /Monte/
Nollenberger. Nays -Thoms /Palmeri.
Item — PobereznyRd -FVTC CUP /PD
City of Oshkosh Application
`► Planned Development Review
f � Conditional Use Permit Review
ON THE WATER
* *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK **
APPLICANT INFORMATION
SUBMIT TO:
Dept of Community Developme
215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 113C
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -113C
PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
Petitioner: 1V /" GL41:� 1610 Date: s� Z y •�c
Petitioner's Address: U & OX CD 2 C' City: ' V K VA4 State: W / Zip: x yj!; 0
Telephone #: (970) ? (- -5'7'1f Fax: ('770) 7 66 - SOd y Other Contact # or Email: 1 L000OPU " 8C "K 'Y'
COA
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): ❑ Ownyr K
❑ Tenant ❑ Prospective Buyer
Date: J5 Z5/ -
Petitioner's Signature (required):
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): SC H WA (3 PaOPr%�f� /GS Date: 'S -Ly -1 d
Owner(s) Address: 0420 / DICI L60^ 5T V 4 �� AM-- B City [� S/� JCOS/ f State: t,,) I Zip:
Telephone #: '110 ) 2,53 /8 Y Fax: (QZO) Z y ^ 7AP 3 Other Contact # or Email: S $,/-}W A $ SL. F!QSTWL
Ownership Status (Please Check): ❑ Individual ❑ Trust ❑ Partnership Acorporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the
property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative
and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: Q 0`'6 - Date: CJ -./ 0
0
SITE INFOR
Address/Location of Proposed Project: P0)9,6 2 H F— NY k D : Parcel No.
Proposed Project Type: RVl ut A)b E od z 091-U% Y l4' CY k11 C/Q C o 'ff— '4
ty: A 6
Current Use of Proper )96P C V ` T L Zoning:
Land Uses Surrounding Site: North: /7 n 6AI C UC. TUt ig-L
South:
East:
West: 1�WY 41
* *Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request.
Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/ Community _Development /Planning.htm
Staf Date Rec
Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use/development plan will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
1. Health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
A 621 cU(,rvn91_ Wilco s�rl�2vc�ar� n�1(1P �rtia�_
T7f�n tJI�T ,��s�vr�t
2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety.
,46J )c v1rV0X OND 4AOU�JO �?�'v vpm �T. 1-'WY 9 r 2-6
NT9AC NANG/r JU57 svuTl+ Or PVQ --- *EY
3. Noise, air, water, or other forms of environmental pollution.
tL Sdr`i' cuNT. A 1N1: n i u S <bL 7 Ve cbi
4. The demand for and availability of public services and facilities.
iVoAR- A 09 tA
5. Character and future development of the area.
1=1TS / NwY q/ Coo 1 owe pee- .4A',�sH'�f
SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
D A NARRATIVE of the proposed conditional use/Development Plan including:
❑ Existing and proposed use of the property
❑ Identification of all structures (including paving, signage, etc.) on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
❑ Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers
❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the
nearest one - hundredth of an acre
• Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fumes, vibration, etc.
• Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area.
• Traffic generation (anticipated number of customers, deliveries, employee shift changes, etc.)
❑ Any other pertinent information to properly understand the intended use/plan and its relation to nearby properties and the
community as a whole
A complete SITE PLAN and BUILDING ELEVATIONS must include:
❑ Two (2) full size (minimum 24" x 36 ") scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations
❑ Two (2) 8 ' /z" x 11 (minimum) to 11" x 17" (maximum) reduction of the site plan and building elevations
❑ One compact disc or diskette with digital plans and drawings of the project in AutoCAD 2000 format with fonts and plot style
table file (if plans have been prepared digitally)
❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner and contact information of petitioner's
engineers/surveyors/architects, or other design professionals used in the preparation of the plans
❑ The date of the original plan and revision dates, if applicable
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale.
❑ All property lines and existing and proposed right -of -way lines with dimensions clearly labeled
❑ All required setback and offset lines
❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives, signs, decks, patios,
fences, walls, etc.
❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for screening
❑ Location and dimension of all on -site parking (and off -site parking provisions if they are to be employed), including a summary
of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30 -36 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance
❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas
❑ Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a photometrics plan
❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e.
visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited to; HVAC
equipment, electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators, etc.
NISNO�SIM %SONNSO Y■
it � 1 1 1 1 it vj
DO 0
t Y � y
3931100 MINOR A311VA X0J
voi oNmns a3soaoae v . I'm
E l
...... ...... —. —. —•—.—.—•—•—•—•—,•—•—•—•—•—,—•-
- - -- ---------------------------------------
i
s � �
it i •�, • • �.
E i • • ; 0 - a
la
I li . . � ' �4 •�� • � • �
•I.
i
•
le e
Ij
E !S tlEg
Ili � R ��� • d } d � f �`y�� pti �� Q 9k
Il pr I N �
.
' — — — — — - - -- — — — — — — — — -
— — — — — — — — — — — —`
I
_• man ... � ''
------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
a xN a
is .- :.
CUP /PD- ED /TRAING FACILITY
4300 BLOCK POBEREZNY RD
PC: 06 -15 -10
KELLER INC
PO BOX 620
KAUKAUNA WI 54150
SCHWAB PROPERTIES
601 OREGON ST STE B
OSHKOSH WI 54902
OSHKOSH YOUTH BASEBALL INC
2860 FOXTAIL LN
OSHKOSH WI 549040000
RE 4233 WAUPUN RD
RUEDINGER PATRICK J
4315 WAUPUN RD
OSHKOSH WI 549020000
RE 4315 & VAC LOT WAUPUN RD
MILITARY VETERANS MUSEUM
PO BOX 1582
APPLETON WI 549121582
RE 4300 POBEREZNY RD
RUSCH THOMAS N
GABERT RICHARD
3807 STATE RD 21 #A
OSHKOSH WI 549040000
RE VAC LOTS W RIPPLE /POBEREZNY
RUEDINGER FAM TST CATHER
PO BOX 368
WINNECONNE WI 549860000
RE VACANT LOT POBEREZNY RD
WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERV CO
PO BOX 19002
GREEN BAY WI 543070000
RE 4320 POBEREZNY RD
1,I
DISCLAIMER
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and It Is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located In various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It Is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh Is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
EDUCATIONAL/ AV
TRAINING FACILITY N .fHK 1H
POBEREZNY RD «THE WATER
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
Scale: 1" = 600'
06!07/10
l
1
I
1
1
I
i
I
I
j 1 1
I j I
I j 1
I j I
I j I
I j I
I j I
j
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
j
_.___._.--- ..------- . - -.y
I 1 I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
j
I
j
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
N
1 I 1
1 I 1
I I j
I I i
1 i j
I I j
I 1 j
I I j
I I I
I I j
I 1 j
I j i
I 1 j
I j i
I I j
1 i j
I I j
1 i j
1 I j
I I j
I I j
I I j
1 j o•
I
ui'
X
%
j
j
j i i
I j i
i
i
I
I
I
I
/
1 I I
1 I 1
I i
I
I
I
I I I
I I j
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 i j
I I i
I I I
I I I
I I j
I I i
1
j
I
I I 1
I I i
I I
j
1
j
I i
I j j 0
I I j
I
i
I
I
I
r!
1 I j
I i
! i
! I
1 1
1 I
wj z
n r I ^\
DISCLAIMER
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and It Is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located In various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It Is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh Is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
EDUCATIONAL/ AV
TRAINING FACILITY N .fHK 1H
POBEREZNY RD «THE WATER
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
Scale: 1" = 600'
06!07/10
l
1'
rr . A /:
fi *I 4 r, ply
O A 'POO"r
V A6
P L
- M.
Y7
lz_
Allm ii' lo
DISCLAIMER
This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and It Is not Intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and It is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh Is not re-
sponsible for any inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
EDUCATIONAL/
TRAINING FACILITY
POBEREZNY RD
Scale: 1" = 600'
N .IHK H
on nc w�hn
City of Oshkosh
Department of
Community Development
06/07/10
Created by - dff