HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-185JUNE 8, 2010
10 -185 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7 -0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE AND SUBMIT WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES 2009 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE
ANNUAL REPORT / WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the 2009
Compliance Maintenance Annual Report, having been reviewed, is approved, and the
proper City officials are authorized and directed to submit the Report to the Department
of Natural Resources.
( 0
OfHKOlH
ON THE WATER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Stephan M. Brand, Utilities Superintendent
DATE: June 1, 2010
RE: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2009 Compliance Maintenance Annual
Report City of Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant
BACKGROUND
The City of Oshkosh is required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources as part of the
Wisconsin Pollution Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) Permit to complete a Compliance
Maintenance Annual Report. This report outlines the performance of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and
sanitary sewer collection system for the previous year. This report needs to be formally approved by the
common council and submitted to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources by June 30, 2010
ANALYSIS
The report is broken down into sections that address specific areas of performance for the wastewater
system. Based on the responses in each section a score is determined and a letter grade is given based
on the score. This grade is used by the Department of Natural Resources to determine the need for
improvements to the wastewater treatment system. A letter grade of an A or B does not require any
action be taken based on the information provide. The following is a brief summary of each section.
Influent Flow and Loadinci This looks at plant flow capacity and treatment ability based on the design of
the facility. Our highest flow month for 2009 was March with a monthly average of 17.64 million gallons
per day which is 50.4 percent of the design flow of 35 million gallons per day . The treatment capacity is
based on Biochemical Oxygen Demand in pounds per day. Our highest influent loading monthly average
was 14,161 pounds in the month of March. Our design loading is 33,336 Ibs which puts us at 42.5 percent
of our design loading for the facility. Based on the available capacity of the facility this section scored a
letter grade A
Effluent Quality BOD, TSS, Ammonia, Phosphorus These four sections look at the quality of our
treatment for each of these parameters based on our permit requirements. We did have one issue as
noted in Section 5.1 with the equipment that feeds the chemical to remove the chlorine required for
disinfection prior to discharge. We were able to correct the problem right away and have increased the
maintenance frequency on this equipment to prevent a reoccurrence. There no points associated with
the issue noted so this section scored a letter grade A .
Biosolids Manaciement Solids are generated from the treatment process due to the growth of the
microorganisms that are used for the treatment of wastewater. We have a separate process to treat this
material as it is removed and turn it into a product that can be beneficially reused as fertilizer on approved
agricultural land. This section of the report looks at the treatment process and management of the
biosolids in compliance with the permit requirements. All requirements were met and this section scored a
letter grade A.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2009 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report City of
Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant
Page 2
Preventative Maintenance and Staffing This section asks general questions about plant maintenance
procedures, record keeping and staffing levels. There were no issues identified with either plant
maintenance or staffing and this section scored a letter rade A.
Operation Certification Department of Natural Resources requires that facilities have certified
operators on staff to operate and manage a wastewater treatment facility and that they attend approved
conferences and training to obtain continuing education credits for certification renewal every three years.
We have certified operators on staff that are certified at the appropriate levels for the wastewater
treatment plant. This section scored a letter grade A.
Financial Management This section looks at the financial aspects of the utility and is done with the
assistance of the Finance Department. In addition to rates, it looks at the funding in the Equipment
Replacement Fund which was is required as a condition of the Clean Water Fund when financing projects
through the Clean Water Fund Financial Assistance Program. Additional information from the CIP has
been added to the Future Planning section to help identify CIP projects specifically related to future
potential Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wastewater Collection System improvements. There were no
issues identified and this section scored a letter grade A .
Collection System This section is completed using information provided by the Streets and Sanitation
Division and Engineering Division based on the activities reported for sanitary sewer maintenance and
construction in 2009. Much of this section is subjective and based on planning and maintenance
activities and scored a letter grade A . The first phase of the Inflow and Infiltration Study undertaken by
the Consulting firm McMahon Engineers /Architects has been completed and implementation of the
recommendations are planned for this year. As noted in the Future Planning section, improvements for
removal of clear water from the collection system is a multi year effort that will continue into the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS
I recommend approval of the Compliance Maintenance Annual Report 2009 for submittal to the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Respectfully Submitted,
Stephan M. Brand
Utilities Superintendent
Approved:
City Manager
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influent Flow and Loading
flows and (C)BOD
12: k'IlVlaximum month design flow and design (C)BOD loading. I
Page 1 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influent Flow and Loading (Continued)
13'.' : ( Number of times the flow and (C)BOD exceeded 90% or 100% of design, points earned, and score:
lk `.I ;;,1V1/as the influent flow meter calibrated in the last vear?
• Yes Enter last calibration date, MM /DD/YYYY 12/1/2009
O No - explain
Use Ordinance
5.1 Did your community have a sewer use ordinance that limited or prohibited the discharge of excessive
conventional pollutants ((C)BOD, SS, or pH) or toxic substances to the sewer from industries, commercial
users, hauled waste, or residences?
• Yes
O No
If No, please describe:
Page 2 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influant Flnw and Loading (Continued)
5.2 Was it necessary to enforce?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, please describe:
e Receivin
6.1 Did you have reauests to receive septaqe at your facility?
Septic Tanks
Holding Tanks
Grease Traps
1
0 Yes O No
1 • Yes ;O No
0 Yes 'O No
6.2 Did you receive seotaae at vour facility? If yes, indicate volume in gallons
Septic Tanks
Holding Tanks
Grease Traps'
0 Yes'O No
0 Yes 'O No
0 Yes 'O No
75040 gal
16475900 gal
5000 gal
6.2.1 If yes to any of the above, please explain if plant performance is affected when receiving any of these
wastes
No adverse effects in plant performance noted.
7.1 Did your facility experience operational problems, permit violations, biosolids quality concerns or
hazardous situations in the sewer system or treatment plant that were attributable to commercial or
industrial discharges in the last year?
• Yes
O No
Yes, describe the situationand your community s response:
There was a diesel fuel spill at an industry that entered the collection system. No adverse effects on
plant performance
7.2 Did your facility accept hauled industrial wastes, landfill leachate, etc?
O Yes
• No
If yes, describe the types of wastes received and any procedures or other restrictions that were in place to
protect the plant fro the discharge of hauled industrial wastes.
Page 3 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Influent Flow and Loading (Continued)
Page 4 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quali and Plant Performance ((C)BOD)
effluent values, e xceedances, and points for
elf any violations occu rred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
as t he effluent flow meter calibrated in the last vear?
0 Yes - enter last calibration date, MO /DAY/YEAR: 11/23/2009
O No - explain:
Page 5 of 31
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
12/6 = 2.0
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance ((C)BOD) (Continued)
Page 6 of 31
What problems, if any, were experienced over the last year that threatened treatment?
Other Monitoring and Limits
5.1 At any time in the past year was there an exceedance of a permit limit for any other pollutants suchas
metals, pH, residual chlorine, or fecal coliform?
0 Yes
O No
If Yes, please describe:
3 -31 -09 Plant equipment failure caused insufficient feed of dechlorination chemical
5.2At any time in the past year was there an effluent acute or chronic whole effluent toxicity (WET) test?
0 Yes
O No
If Yes, please describe:
F 27nd quarter 2009 acute & chronic W.E.T. tests performed. Both passed.
5.31f the biomonitoring (WET) test did not pass, were steps taken to identify and/or reduce source(s) of
toxicity?
O Yes
O No
NA
Please explain unless not applicable:
Page 6 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Qualitv and Plant Performance (Total Suspended Solids)
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
12/6 = 2.0
If anv violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
Page 7 of 31
Aonthlv averaoe effluent values, exceedances, and points for TSS: I
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
effluent values, exceedances, and points for NH3:
Note: Limit exceedances are considered for monthly OR weekly averages but not both.
When a monthly average limit exists it will be used to detect exceedances and
generate points. This will be true even if a weekly limit also exists. When a weekly
average limit exists and a monthly limit does not exist, the weekly limit will be used
to detect exceedances and generate points.
Page 8 of 31
Effluent Quality and Plant Pe rformance (Am monia = NH3)
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Ammonia = NH3) (Continued)
If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance?
Page 9 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Effluent Quality and Plant Performan (Phosphorus)
effluent values, exceedances, and p oints for Phosphorus:
any violations occurred, what a ction was taken to regain com
Page 10 of 31
NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance
for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of
discharge.
Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is
12/6 = 2.0
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
6iosolids Quality and Management
Questions
Points
Biosolids Use /Disposal:
1.1 How did you use or dispose of your biosolids ?(Check all that apply)
® Land Applied Under Your Permit
❑ Publicly Distributed Exceptional Quality 6iosolids
❑ Hauled to Another Permitted Facility
❑ Landfilled
❑ Incinerated
❑ Other
NOTE: If you do not remove biosolids from your system annually, please describe your system typ
such as lagoons, reed beds, recirculating sand filters, etc, and if biosolids were land applied last
year, please also check top box above.
1.1.1 If you checked Other, Please describe:
Land Application Site:
Last Year's Approved and Active Land Application Sites
2.1.1 How many acres did you have? 2.1.2 How many acres did you
use?
535 acres 535 acres
2.2 If you did not have enough acres for your land application needs, what action was taken?
2.3 Did you overapply nitrogen on any of your approved land application sites you used Iasi
0
year?
Yes(30 points)
• No
2.4 Have all the sites you used last year for land application been soil tested in the previous
0
4 years?
Yes
O No (10 points)
O N/A
3` 6iosolids Metals
Number of biosolids outfalls in your WPDES permit = 1
3.1 For each outfall tested, verify the biosolids metal quality values for your facility during the last
calendar year
BIOSOLIDS METALS CHARACTERISTICS
:002 - Cake sludge
Page 11 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
Parameter
80% of
H.Q.
Ceilii
May
Limit
Limit
Limit
arsenic
111111111111111111111111
Nov
75
cadmium
39
185
copper
1500
4300
lead
300
840
mercury
I
17
57
molybdenum 60
8.9
75
nickel
336
8 0 0
i
420
selenium
80
100
on a dry weight basis Times Exceeded
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec High Ceiling
Quality
4.5
8.3
8.3
8.9
9.4
8 0 0
i
1
.7
.61
1.3
1.1
1 0 0
660
570
540
650
610
650 0
37
25
28
37
40
35 0 0
<.074
.11
.099
.1
.18
.35 0 0
6.7
5.5
7.5
9.3
10
9.8
24
22
25
29
25
28
4.2
<1.6
5.7
5.9
4
4.1
LOR10
640
640
540
680
610
680
3.1.1 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the high quality limits OR 80% of the limit for I0
molybdenum, nickel or selenium = 0
Exceedance Points
9
0
0 Points
O
1 -2
10 Points
O
> 2
15 Points
3.1.2 If you exceeded the high quality limits, did you cumulatively track the metals loadings at each 0
land application site? (check applicable box)
O Yes
O No (10 points)
0 NA. Did not exceed limits or no HQ limit applies (0 points)
O NA. Did not land apply biosolids until limit was met(0 points)
3.1.3 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the ceiling limits = 0 0
Exceedance Points
9
0
0 Points
O
1
10 Points
p
> 1
15 Points
3.1.4 Were biosolids land applied which exceeded the ceiling limit? 0
Yes(20 points)
• No (0 points)
3.1.5 If any metal limit (high quality or ceiling ) was exceeded at any time, what action was taken?
Has the source of the metals been identifed?
Page 12 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
4 q!,3
,
Pathogen Control(per outfall):
g
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
1/1/2009 - 2/28/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
g
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
1/1/2009 - 2/28/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
g
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
3/1/2009 - 4/30/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
g
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
5/1/2009 - 6/30/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Page 13 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Rinsnlids Otiality and Manaaement (Continued)
Outfall Number: 002
Biosolids Class: B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates: 7/1/2009 - 8/31/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process: ANAER
Process Description: HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE.
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
9/1/2009 - 10/31/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE
Outfall Number:
002
Biosolids Class:
B
Bacteria Type and Limit
Sample Dates:
11/1/2009 - 12/31/2009
Density:
Sample Concentratinor Amount:
Process:
ANAER
Process Description:
HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME
GREATER THAN 15 DAYS AT 35
DEGREES CENTIGRADE
4.1 If exceeded Class B limit or did not meet the process criteria at the time of land
application(40 Points)
4.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time?
O Yes
Page 14 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
Outfall Number:
• No
If yes, what action was taken?
Method Date:
5%
Vector Attraction Reduction(per outfall):0
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
64.3
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
2/11/2009
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
64.3
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
4/8/2008
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
48.1
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
6/3/2009
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
i 58
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
8/5/2009
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
53.6
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
10/5/2009
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
56.3
Page 15 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued)
Page 16 of 31
Outfall Number:
002
Method Date:
12/2/2009
Option Used To Satisfy Requirement:
VSR
154.7
Limit (if applicable):
38
Results (if applicable):
5.1 If the limit or criteria was exceeded at the time of land application, 40 point
5.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time?
0
Yes
No
If yes, what action was taken?
Biosolids Storage:0
6.1 How many days of actual,current biosolids storage capacity did your wastewater treatment
facility have either on -site or off -site?
0
0 >+ 180 days (0 points)
O 150 - 179 days (10 points)
O 120 - 149 days (20 points)
O 90 - 119 days (30 points)
O < 90 days (40 points)
O Not Applicable (0 points)
6.2 If you check Not Applicable above, explain why.
Issues:
7.1 Describe any outstanding biosolids issues with treatment, use or overall mgt?
Page 16 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
.qtatenn anfi PravPntative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants)
Page 17 of 31
Questions
Points
Was your wastewater treatment plant adequately staffed last year?
• Yes
O No
If No, please describe:
Could use more help /staff for:
Did your wastewater staff have adequate time to properly operate and maintain the plant and fulfill
all wastewater management tasks including recordkeeping?
• Yes
O No. Explain
3. . ' Did your plant have a documented AND implemented plan for preventative maintenance on major
0
equipment items?
• Yes (Continue with questions below)
O No (40 points and go to question 6)
If No, explain:
4,,.' "', Did this preventative maintenance program depict frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, and
0
other tasks necessary for each piece of equipment?
• Yes
O No (10 points)
5W ere Were these preventative maintenance tasks, as well as major equipment repairs, recorded and
0
filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly?
• Yes
O (Paper file system)
O (Computer program)
• (Both Paper and Computer)
O No (10 points)
6, Did your plant have a detailed O &M Manual that was used as a reference when needed?
• Yes
O No
7 Rate the overall maintenance of your wastewater plant.
• Excellent
Page 17 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Staffina and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants) (Continued)
O Very Good
O Good
O Fair
O Poor
Describe your rating:
Facility staff are proactive with operations, maintenance, and equipment replacement.
Page 18 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Operator Certification and Education
Questions Points
Did you have a designated operator -in- charge during the report year? 0
• Yes (0 point)
O No (20 points)
Name: KEVIN R SORGE
Certification No: 33081
". In accordance with Chapter NR 114.08 and 114.09, Wisconsin Administrative Code, what grade
and subclass(es) were required for the operator -in- charge to operate the wastewater treatment
plant and what grade and subclass(es) were held by the operator -in- charge?
Required: 4 - ACEFGIJ; A - PRIMARY SETTLING; C - ACTIVATED SLUDGE; E -
DISINFECTION; F - ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; G - MECHANICAL
SLUDGE; I - PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; J - LABORATORY
Held: 4 - ACEFGIJ; 4 - A= PRIMARY SETTLING GRADE 4; C= ACTIVATED
SLUDGE GRADE 4; E= DISINFECTION GRADE 4; F= ANAEROBIC
DIGESTION GRADE 4; G= MECHANICAL SLUDGE GRADE 4;
1= PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL GRADE 4; J= LABORATORY GRADE 4
Was the operator -in- charge certified at the appropriate level to operate this plant? 0
• Yes (0 point)
O No (20 points)
4 3 t In the event of the loss of your designated operator -in- charge, did you have a contingency plan to 0
=I j ensure the continued proper operation & maintenance of the plant that includes one or more of the
following options (check all that apply):
4.1 ® one or more additional certified operators on staff
4.2 ❑ an arrangement with another certified operator
4.3 ❑ an arrangement with another community with a certified operator
4.4 ❑ an operator on staff who has an operator -in- training certificate for your plant and
is expected be certified within one year
4.5 ❑ a consultant to serve as your certified operator
4.6 ❑ None of the above (20 points)
Explain: The wastewater superintendent, utilities superintendent, and two liquids
operators hold all of the necessary certifications.
Page 19 of 31
Operator Certification and Education (Continued)
5 l I If you had a designated operator -in- charge, was the operator -in- charge earning continuing
„ ,i�' education credits at the following rates?
Grades T, 1, and 2:
• Averaging 6 or more CEUs per year
O Averaging less than 6 CEUs per year
Grades 3 and 4:
• Averaging 8 or more CEUs per year
O Averaging less than 8 CEUs per year
Not applicable:
O See Question 1
Page 20 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Financial Managem
Questions
1 :.. Person Providing This Financial Information
Name: Jeremy Maurer
Telephone: (920) 232 -5321
E -Mail Address(optional):
2 Are User Charge or other Revenues sufficient to cover O &M Expenses for your wastewater
0
,.. treatment plant AND /OR collection system ?
Yes (0 points)
O No (40 points)
If No, please explain:
3< When was the User Charge System or other revenue source(s) last reviewed and /or revised?
0
; Year: 2009
0 -2 years ago (0 points)
O 3 or more years ago (20 points)
O Not Applicable (Private Facility)
Did you have a special account (e.g., CWFP required segregated Replacement Fund, etc.) or
0
financial resources available for repairing or replacing equipment for your wastewater treatment
plant and/or collection system?
0 Yes
O No (40 points)
REPLACEMENT FUNDS(PUBLIC MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SHALL COMPLETE QUESTION 5)
Equipment Replacement Funds
5.1 When was the Equipment Replacement Fund last reviewed and/or revised?
0
Year: 2009
0 1 -2 years ago (0 points)
O 3 or more years ago (20 points)
O Not Applicable Explain:
5.2 What amount is in your Replacement Fund?
Equipment Replacement Fund Activity
5.2.1 Ending Balance Reported on Last Year's CMAR: $3,781,395.79
5.2.2 Adjustments + $0.00
if necessary (e.g., earned interest, audit correction, withdrawal of
excess funds, increase making up previous shortfall, etc.)
5.2.3 Adjusted January list Beginning Balance $3,781,395.79
Page 21 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
M ' I M na ement (Continued)
inancia
a g
5.2.4 Additions to Fund (e.g., portion of User Fee, earned interest, etc.) + $28,036.33
5.2.5 Subtractions from Fund (e.g., equipment replacement, major repairs - $1,123,452.93
- use description box 5.2.5.1 below *.)
5.2.6 Ending Balance as of December 31st for CMAR Reporting Year $2,685,979.19
(All Sources: This ending balance should include all Equipment Replacement
Funds whether held in a bank account(s), certificate(s) of deposit, etc.)
"5.2.5.1. Indicate adjustments, equipment purchases and /or major repairs from 5.2.5 above
Final clarifier rebuilds, HVAC upgrade in the headworks, Barscreen upgrade in the
F headworks
5.3 What amount should be in your replacement
fund? $1,670,506.00
(If you had a CWFP loan, this amount was originally based on the Financial Assistance Agreement
(FAA) and should be regularly updated as needed. Further calculation instructions and an exampl
can be found by clicking the HELP option button.)
5.3.1 Is the Dec. 31 Ending Balance in your Replacement Fund above ( #5.2.6) equal to or greater
than the amount that should be in it( #5.3)?
• Yes
O No Explain:
Future Planning
6.1 During the next ten years, will you be involved in formal planning for upgrading, rehabilitating
or new construction of your treatment facility or collection system?
• Yes (If yes, please provide major project information, if not already listed below)
O No
Project Description
Estimated Cost
Approximate
Construction
Year
Additional Aeration Basin
$2,700,000.00
2015
2 Final Clarifiers
$2,600,000.00
2015
New influent pump room
$1,800,000.00
2012
Digester draft tube mixers
$2,500,000.00
2016
Sanitary Sewer Improvements 4.21 miles CIP
$4,104,200.00
2010
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements based in previous years study Capital
Improvment Program (CIP)
$750,000.00
2010
Sanitatry Sewer Improvements CIP
$3,500,000.00
2011
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements based on previous years study CIP
$750,000.00
2011
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$5,154,000.00
2012
Page 22 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
C; ini AAnnnnomont [r.nntintip-H)
Page 23 of 31
Inflow and Infiltration study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study CIP
$750,000.00
2012
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$3,916,800.00
2013
Inflow and Infiltration Study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study CIP
$750,000.00
2013
Sanitary Sewer Improvements CIP
$3,500,000.00
2014
Inflow and Infiltration study continuation and implementation of
improvements from previous years study
$750,000.00
2014
7. ',:. ';
Financial Management General Comments:
Page 23 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems
Do you have a Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance(CMOM) requirement in your
WPDES permit?
O Yes
• No
Did you have a documented (written records /files, computer files, video tapes, etc.) sanitary sewer I0
M
collection system operation & maintenance or COM program last calendar year?
• Yes (go to question 3)
O No (30 points) (ao to auestion 4
(3 „) Check the elements listed below that are included in your Operation and Maintenance (O &M) or I
CMOM program.:
® Goals: Describe the specific goals you have for your collection system:
Implement improvements identifed in 2009 study.Continue study of system in 2010
including flow monitoring, implement study recommedations, develop new study
area based on data from previous study. Continue process.
®
Organization: Do you have the following written organizational elements (check only
those that you have):
®
Ownership and governing body description
®
Organizational chart
®
Personnel and position descriptions
®
Internal communication procedures
❑
Public information and education program
®
Legal Authority: Do you have the legal authority for the following (check only those tt
apply):
®
Sewer use ordinance Last Revised MM /DD/YYYY 7/31/2007
®
Pretreatment/industrial control Programs
®
Fat, Oil and Grease control
®
Illicit discharges (commercial, industrial)
®
Private property clear water (sump pumps, roof or foundation drains, etc)
®
Private lateral inspections /repairs
®
Service and management agreements
®
Maintenance Activities: details in Question 4
®
Design and Performance Provisions: How do you ensure that your sewer system is
designed and constructed properly?
®
State plumbing code
®
DNR NR 110 standards
®
Local municipal code requirements
®
Construction, inspection and testing
❑
Others:
Page 24 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary ..'PwPr Collection Svstems (Continued)
Page 25 of 31
Overflow Emergency Response Plan: Does your emergency response capability
include (check only those that you have):
® Alarm system and routine testing
® Emergency equipment
® Emergency procedures
® Communications /Notifications (DNR, Internal, Public, Media etc)
® Capacity Assurance: How well do you know your sewer system? Do you have the
following?
® Current and up -to -date sewer map
® Sewer system plans and specifications
® Manhole location map
® Lift station pump and wet well capacity information
® Lift station O &M manuals
Within your sewer system have you identified the following?
® Areas with flat sewers
® Areas with surcharging
® Areas with bottlenecks or constrictions
® Areas with chronic basement backups or SSO's
® Areas with excess debris, solids or grease accumulation
® Areas with heavy root growth
® Areas with excessive infiltration /inflow (1 /1)
® Sewers with severe defects that affect flow capacity
® Adequacy of capacity for new connections
® Lift station capacity and /or pumping problems
❑ Annual Self- Auditing of your O &M /CMOM Program to ensure above components are
being implemented, evaluated, and re- prioritized as needed.
® Special Studies Last Year(check only if applicable):
® Infiltration /Inflow (1 /1) Analysis
❑ Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)
❑ Sewer Evaluation and Capacity Managment Plan (SECAP)
❑ Lift Station Evaluation Report
® Others:
Continuation of Northwest Sanitary Sewer Study. Discussions with Butte de Mort
Sanitary District.
r:.
Did your sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program include the following
maintenance activities? Complete all that apply and indicate the amount maintained:
Cleaning 31 /o of system /year
Root Removal 2.4 /o of system /year
Flow Monitoring 75 /o of system /year
Smoke Testing of system /year
Page 25 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitnry Sewer Collection Svstems (Continued)
Page 26 of 31
+ Sewer Line Televising 5.2 /o of system /year
Manhole Inspections 52 /o of system /year
Lift Station O &M 104 per L.S /year
Manhole Rehabilitation of manholes rehabed
Mainline Rehabilitation 1.70 /o of sewer lines rehabed
Private Sewer Inspections .80 /o of system /year
Private Sewer 1/1 Removal 1.6 /o of private services
Please include additional comments about your sanitary sewer collection system below:
Flow monitoring conducted at 5 major interceptor connection locations
Provide the following collection system and flow information for the past year:
28.37 Total Actual Amount of Precipitation Last Year
31.57 Annual Average Precipitation (for your location)
269.84 Miles of Sanitary Sewer
17 Number of Lift Stations
0 Number of Lift Station Failure
LJ Number of Sewer Pipe Failures
15 Number of Basement Backup Occurrences
94 Number of Complaints
11.302 Average Daily Flow in MGD
Page 26 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
17.639 1 Peak Monthly Flow in MGD(if available)
Peak Hourly Flow in MGD(if available)
Page 27 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued)
NUMBER OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) REPORTED (10 POINTS PER OCCURRENCE) 0
Date Location Cause Estimated
Volume (MG)
NONE REPORTED
Were there SSOs that occurred last year that are not listed above?
O Yes
• No
If Yes, list the SSOs that occu
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
0.00 Lift Station Fail ures(failu res/ps/year)
0.01 Sewer Pipe Failures(pipe failures /sewer mile /yr)
0.00 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (number /sewer mile /yr)
0.06 Basement Backups(number /sewer mile)
0.35 Complaints (number /sewer mile)
1.6 Peaking Factor Ratio (Peak Monthly:Annual Daily Average)
0.0 Peaking Factor Ratio(Peak Hourly:Annual daily Average)
Was infiltration /inflow(1 /1) significant in y our community last ye ar?
If Yes,
O Yes
• No
ease describe:
7 3,;
'. Has infiltration /inflow and resultant high flows affected performance or created problems in your
collection system, lift stations, or treatment plant at any time in the past year?
O Yes
9 No
If Yes, please describe:
Explain any infiltration /inflow(1 /1) changes this year from previous years?
Page 28 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Qnnif�M/ QnUmr (`nllac4inn gvgtp-mq (rnntinllP(tl
Page 29 of 31
9.,.,
What is being done to address infiltration /inflow in your collection system?
Consultant continuing on next phase of M study and implemetation of improvements identifed
in 2009 study.
Page 29 of 31
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2009
�wmr�ro ki- /V17rn
Notes:
A = Voluntary Range
B = Voluntary Range
C = Recommendation Range (Response Required)
D = Action Range (Response Required)
F = Action Range (Response Required)
COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT
Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Plant Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2009
Rasnlutinn or Owner's Statement
NAME OF GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER; [ DATE OF RESOLUTION OR ACTION TAKEN
RESOLUTION NUMBER
ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO SPECIFIC CMAR
SECTIONS (Optional for grade A or B', required for grade C, D, or F):
Influent Flow and Loadings: Grade =A
Effluent Quality: BOD, Grade =A
Effluent Quality: TSS: Grade =A
Effluent' Quality: Ammonia: Grade =A
Effluent! Quality: Phosphorus: Grade =A
Blosolids Quality and Management: Grade =A
Staffing: Grade =A
Operator Certification: Grade =A
Financial Management: Grade =A
Collection Systems: Grade =A
ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO THE OVERALL GRADE
POINT AVERAGE AND ANY GENERAL COMMENTS (Optional for G.P.A. greater than or equal to 3.00,
required for G.P.A. less than 3.00) G.P.A. _'