HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-176MAY 25, 2010 10 -176 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 6 -0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: AWARD BID TO PHENCO INC. FOR RIVERSIDE PARK
RIVERWALK PROJECT ($871,933.33)
INITIATED BY: PARKS DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Oshkosh has heretofore advertised forbids for the Riverside
Park Phase 2 Seawall and Riverwalk Construction; and
WHEREAS, upon the opening and tabulation of bids, it appears that the following is
the most advantageous bid:
PHENCO, INC.
133 S. FIELDCREST DRIVE
NEENAH WI 54956
Total Bid: $871,933.33
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that the said bid is hereby accepted and the proper City officials are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into an appropriate agreement for the purpose of same, all
according to plans, specifications, and bid on file. Money for this purpose is hereby
appropriated from:
Acct. No. 323 - 0740 - 7216 -06020 Property Improvements - Riverwalk/Riverside Park
CITY HALL
215 Church Avenue
P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, City of Oshkosh
549903 -103 -111 30 0
0
QIHKOlH
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Ray Maurer, Parks Director
DATE: May 20, 2010
RE: Riverside Park River Walk Project Bids
BACKGROUND
In 2005, the City of Oshkosh Fox River Corridor River Walk Plan and Design Guidelines
prepared by JJR were approved. As stated in the document, "the Fox River has long been
recognized as a great asset of the City of Oshkosh; it is now time to celebrate the River ". The
Plan recommended various river walk development, connections to regional trails, north side
river walk development and south side river walk development. In 2009, AECOM was retained
by the City to prepare permit applications and design plans for the Riverside Park River Walk.
On April 12, 2010, the Advisory Parks Board approved the plans for bidding.
Major highlights of the bid specifications include site preparation, sheet pile seawall construction,
concrete walkway paving and grading and seeding. The base bid included a colored, stamped
concrete edge on the back side of the concrete walkway.
ANALYSIS
On May 18, 2010, three bids were received for the Riverside Park River Walk project. The bid
tabulation is attached. Various alternates were requested in the bid specifications including
decorative railing along the water edge; brick paver border rather than the colored, stamped
concrete; curb head rather than the colored, stamped concrete; additional grading and soil if the
curb head were selected; alternate sheet pile; and clear the dock wall driving line. Considering
the various alternates, the project team decided the curb head was the best alternative as this was
included in the Plan for all the various areas of the river walk to be constructed in the future and
the other alternatives were deemed to be more labor intensive in the future and less likely to
remain aesthetically pleasing (paver bricks or colored, stamped concrete). This area will most
likely require snow removal and having the curb head to guide the snow plows or snow blowers
will reduce the amount of turf damage compared to the paver bricks or colored, stamped concrete.
With the curb head, additional grading and soil is necessary to obtain site grades. to the back of
the curb. The final alternate the team and AECOM have decided to recommend is the alternate
sheet pile; AECOM has reviewed and approved the specifications for the alternate sheet pile. The
project team has decided not to recommend installation of the stainless steel railing at a cost of
$215,578.00 which is consistent with the direction provided by the Advisory Park Board. The
contract contains numerous pay items at unit prices; the final contract price will be based on the
actual quantities of measured materials. In addition, there are some direct purchase costs that the
City has agreed to assume. This includes the tipping fee for unsuitable excavated materials taken
to landfill, benches, trash receptacles, landscaping and the purchase of lighting and electrical
fixtures (light poles, bollard lights, power service, and electrical handholes). The City is
presently obtaining quotations but estimates the following:
Tipping fee at landfill: 3,900 tons @ $30.00 per ton = $117,000
Purchase of lighting and electrical: $ 56,700
Benches, trash receptacles and landscaping: 15,000
Total estimated direct purchase costs:
$188,700
FISCAL IMPACT
The Phenco, Inc. bid for this project, with the recommended alternates, will have a fiscal impact
of $871,933.33. Estimated direct purchase costs by the City will have a fiscal impact of
approximately $188,700. Funding for this item would be charged to account 323- 0740 -7216-
06020. The total budget for this project, including design services and construction management
is $1,471,500.00. Of this amount approximately $94,500.00 will be used for design services and
construction management resulting in the entire project being approximately $316,000.00 under
budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Parks Department and Purchasing Department
Riverside Park River Walk project to Phenco, Inc
Respectfully Submitted,
Ray Maurer, Parks Director
recommends the Common Council award the
for $871,933.33.
Approved:
Mark Rohloff, City Manager
Contractor Recommendation for Riverside Park Phase 2 Seawall and Riverwalk Construction
May 20, 2010
To: Ray Maurer — City of Oshkosh Parks Director CC: Darlene Brandt — Planning Dept.
From: Terry Peterson, Principal Engineer — AECOM
On May 18, 2010 three bids were received and opened for the Riverside Park Phase 2 Seawall and
Riverwalk Construction. Apparent low bidder at time of opening was Phenco Inc. of Neenah, WI.
Phenco submitted their pre - qualification form on May 13, 2010, as required.
Following the opening, AECOM reviewed the bid and contacted Phenco for clarification on two items:
Alt. 1 Decorative Railing — Phenco's bid price of $229.82 did not include all stainless steel material for
the railing posts. Phenco recontacted their fabricator and supplied a price of $307.97 for this railing.
Fax copy is attached.
Alt. 5 Seawall using alternate steel sheetpile section — Phenco intends to utilize a SKZ22 sheetpile,
supplied by Skyline Steel. Fax copy is attached.
Bid Review
AECOM reviewed Phenco's bid and found no errors in the extension of unit prices and quantities, and
with the total base bid amount of $890,966.05.
As noted above, Phenco was pre - qualified with the City for work of this nature. AECOM has worked on
prior projects with Phenco as the contractor, and their workmanship has been acceptable.
Discussions with Ray Maurer and Darlene Brandt indicate the City may desire to utilize some of the
alternate bid items. These include Alt. 3 Walkway Curb Head, Alt. 4 Additional Grading associated with
the Walkway Curb Head, and Alt. 5 Alternate Steel Section Dockwall.
The following table lists the contract price using these Alternates:
Base Bid:
Delete Item D -3 Stamped Colored Concrete Border:
Add Item Alt. 3 Walkway Curb Head:
Add Item Alt. 4 Addnl Site Grading Assoc. with Curb Head
Delete Item C -3 Steel Dockwall:
Add Item Alt. 5 Alternate Steel Section Dockwall:
New Contract Price:
$890,966.05
- $19,224.55
+$16,991.48
+$10,207.35
- $505,921.00
+$478,914.00
$871,933.33
Comments
Using the Walkway Curb Head alternate will provide a consistent appearance with the proposed
walkway for the Marion Road Development . However this Curb Head will not match the existing brick
paver border along the Leach Amphitheater dockwall. Therefore a transition between the Curb Head
and the brick pavers will need to be selected during construction (optionally, the existing brick paver
border along the Leach dockwall could be replaced with Curb Head). The Parks Dept reports ongoing
problems with maintenance of the brick pavers. The Curb Head alternate requires regrading of the lawn
section adjacent to the new walkway. This lawn area is quite flat at present, so particular attention will
be needed during construction to ensure adequate drainage is provided; possibly one or two yard
drains may need to be added. These could be connected directly to the storm sewer extensions.
The proposed SCZ22 alternate steel pile section has acceptable structural capacity, but has slightly
different dimensions than the PZ22, which was used in the design. Phenco will be responsible for
submitting shop drawings showing how this section will fit together with the tie -rod spacing and waler
connections. AECOM will need to do a detailed review of the submitted shop drawings using this
section to confirm that the design parameters are met. The cost for this review was not included in our
scope for construction services, but should be in the $1000 + /- range. Therefore there is a net cost
savings to use this section. Please be aware that SCZ22 is a cold - rolled section, and will not have as tight
a tolerance for fit -up in the interlocks as would a hot - rolled section. Over the long -term, this may allow
some movement of backfill particles through the interlocks, causing voids beneath the concrete
walkway. However, the walkway was designed to be supported by the dockwall and not the backfill
beneath it, therefore the loss of some backfill will likely not be noticeable. Driving of cold - rolled sheets
can be more difficult to maintain alignment. A hot - rolled section will provide a better final product, but
this alternate section can be used if the cost savings to the City are considered appreciable.
As we discussed, this contract contains numerous pay items at unit prices. The final contract price will
be based on the actual quantities of measured materials.
In addition to the contractor's bid costs, there are some direct purchase costs that the City has agreed to
assume. This includes the tipping fee for unsuitable excavated materials taken to the landfill in Berlin,
and purchase of lighting and electrical fixtures (pole- mounted luminaires, poles, bollard lights, power
service, and electrical handholes) . The City is presently obtaining quotations from the supplier,
therefore the figures listed below should be considered estimates only
Tipping Fee at landfill: 3900 tons @ $30.00 per ton = $117,000
Purchase of lighting and electrical: 56,700
Total direct costs: $ 173,700
Based on the information provided, AECOM recommends contracting with Phenco for this project.
End of Summary
Attachments: E -mail from Phenco with Alt. 1 and Alt. 5 details.
RIVERSIDE PARK PHASE 2
SEAWALL & RIVERWALK CONSTRUCTION
BIDS OPENED MAY 18, 2010
10:00:00 AM
NAME OF
BIDDER
Lunda Construction Co
2000 Taylor Street
Little Chute, WI 54140
Phenco Inc.
133 S Fieldcrest Drive
Neenah, WI 54956
McMullen & Pitz Construction C
17 Maritime Drive
Manitowoc, WI 54221
TOTAL
BASE BID
$1,106,888.70
$890,966.05
$1,281,868.57
Alt. 1
$101,514.00
$160,875.00
$290,500.00
Alt. 2
$27,350.91
$11,081.40
$25,185.00
Alt. 3
$16,084.82
$16,991.48
$16,790.00
Alt. 4
$2,551.00
$10,207.35
$2,000.00
Alt. 5
$525,801.00
$478,914.00
($85,000.00)
Alt. 6
$2,510.85
$4,500.00
$6,300.00
BID BOND /
CERTIFIED CHECK
BB
BB
BB
Riverside Park Phase 2 Seawall & Riverwalk Construction
Bids Opened May 18, 2010
10:00 AM
NAME OF
BIDDER
Phenco Inc
133 S Fieldcrest Dr., Neenah Wis
McMullen & Pitz Constr.
17 Maritime Dr, Manitowoc
Lunda Construction
2000 Taylor St., Little Chute
Bid Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
Bid Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
A. General
A -1 Mobilization /demobilization
1
3,700.00
3,700.00
1
82,500.00
82,500.00
1
38,300.00
38,300.00
A -2 Bonds &Insurance
1
13,000.00
13,000.00
1
12,750.00
12,750.00
1
10,959.00
10,959.00
A -3 Security Fence
1
4,000.00
4,000.00
1
7,200.00
7,200.00
1
3,776.00
3,776.00
TOTAL-GENERAL
$20,700.00
$102,450.00
$53,035.00
B. Site Preparation
B -1 Remove /dispose concrete, pole bases, timber dockwall, &
Misc
1
5,000.00
5,000.00
1
20,825.00
20,825.00
1
8,550.00
8,550.00
B -2 Remove /dispose asphalt pavement
480
2.00
960.00
480
2.50
1,200.00
480
2.35
1,128.00
B -3 Sawcut concrete /asphalt pavement
15
5.00
75.001
15
50.001
750.00
15
2.04
30.60
B-4 Remove existing flag poles; transport to City garage
1
500.00
500.00
1
2,150.00
2,150.00
1
510.00
510.00
B -5 Remove existing trees, dispose off -site
3
960.00
2,880.00
3
150.00
450.00
3
170.00
510.0
B -6 Remove existing storm sewer & manholes, backfill
1
3,757.00
3,757.00
1
2,750.00
2,750.00
1
2,602.00
2,602.00
B -7 Strip & stockpile topsoil
4260
0.35
1,491.00
4260
0.80
3,408.00
4260
0.62
2,641.20
TOTAL - SITE PREPARATION
$14,663.00
$31,533.00
$15,971.80
C. SEAWALL
C -1 Excavation, salvage backfill
675
4.00
2,700.00
675
5.50
3,712.50
675
7.56
5,103.00
C -2 Excavation, transport to landfill
2200
8.35
18,370.00
2200
18.54
40,788.00
2200
9.32
20,504.00
C -3 Steel dockwall, anchor wall, end details, tie -rods, walers,
structural members & connections
1
505,921.00
505,921.00
1
737,750.00
737,750.00
1
668,500.00
668,500.00
C-4 Crushed stone backfill; clean aggregate fill between timber
bulkhead & steel
3500
10.35
36,225.001
3500
12.271
42,945.00
3500
1 10.99
38,465.00
C -5 Dockwall
950
14.50
13,775.00
950
15.40
14,630.00
950
1 16.65
15,817.50
C-6 Type SAS geotextile
3300
1.35
4,455.00
3300
1.50
4,950.00
3300
1.55
5,115.00
C -7 Timberfender
600
18.00
10,800.00
600
31.88
19,128.00
600
21.43
12,858.00
C-8 Penetration for 43 x 68 outfall
1
13,000.00
13,000.00
1
22,500.00
22,500.00
1
13,276.00
13,276.00
C -9 Special detail for watermain crossing
1
1,445.00
1,445.00
1
5,970.00
5,970.00
1
3,267.00
3,267.00
C -10 Penetration for 12 in. oulfall
1
10,000.00
10,000.001
1
1,600.001
1,600.00
1
10,137.00
10,137.00
C -11 Penetration for 15 in. outfall
1
2,590.00
2,590.00
1
1,600.00
1,600.00
1
10,137.00
10,137.00
TOTAL-SEAWALL
$619,281.00
$895,573.50
$803,179.50
D. PAVING
D -1 114 in. dense aggregate base course
480
16.50
7,920.00
480
10.50
5,040.00
480
11.05
5,304.00
D -2 Concrete walkway - 6 in.
11854
4.40
52,157.60
11854
4.63
54,884.02
11854
4.16
49,312.64
D -3 Stamped colored concrete border
1679
1145
19,224.55
1679
10.45
17,545.55
1679
10.82
18,166.78
D-4 Concrete walkway w/thickened edge
700
9.70
6,790.00
700
4.02
2,814.00
700
9.16
6,412.00
D -5 Structural angle for walkway support on existing dockwall at
Leach Amphitheater
70
13.75
962.50
70
34.28
2,399.60
70
139.27
9,748.90
D -6 Delectable warning late
8
44.00
352.00
8
62.50
500.00
8
40.85
326.80
D -7 Replacement curb
7
66.00
462.00
7
39.00
273.00
7
62.70
438.90
TOTAL - PAVING
$87,868.65
$83,456.17
$89,710.02
E. EROSION CONTROL
E -1 Erosion control silt fence
470
2.00
940.00
470
2.50
1,175.00
470
2.17
1,019.90
E -2 Turbidity curtain
1
15,312.00
15,312.00
1
18,600.00
18,600.00
1
23,280.00
23,280.00
E -3 Truck tracking pad wl eotextile
1
1,000.001
1,000.00
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
1
1,531.00
1,531.00
E-4 Inlet protection
5
100.00
500.00
5
459.00
2,295.00
5
63.27
316.35
E -5 Erosion control matting
3305
1.50
4,957.50
3305
1.49
4,924.45
3305
1 0.93
3,073.65
TOTAL EROSION CONTROL
$22,709.50
$29,494.45
$29,220.90
F. LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL
F -1 Install light poles & fixtures/lighted bollards, power
center /hand holes; Provide concrete pole bases, conduit, stubs,
wiring, receptacles, connections to Amphitheater, Main St &
Convention Ctr& assoc. items
1
65,438.00
65,438.00
1
75,590.001
75,590.00
1
55,102.00
55,102.00
F -2 Conduit from Main St to Court Str for future commuications 3
700
8.50
5,950.00
700
5.46
3,822.00
700
5.10
3,570.00
TOTAL - LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL
$71,388.00
$79,412.00
$58,672.00
G. GRADING & LANDSCAPING
G -1 General grading & soil import/export to obtain site grades per
plan - not including topsoil
1
4,460.001
4,460,001
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
1
3,602.00
3,602.00
G -2 Topsoil processed from stockpile & replaced
2855
2.00
5,710.00
2855
1.10
3,140.50
2855
0.64
1,827.20
Riverside Park Phase 2 Seawall & Riverwalk Construction
Bids Opened May 18, 2010
10:00 AM
NAME OF
BIDDER
Phenco Inc
133 5 Fieldcrest Dr., Neenah Wrs
McMullen & Pitz Constr.
17 Maritime Dr, Manitowoc
Lunde Construction
2000 Taylor St., Little Chute
Bid Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
Bid Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
Qty
Cost/ Unit
Item Cost
G -3 Dispose excess stockpiled topsoil
106
9.80
1,038.80
106
11.00
1,166.00
106
9.15
969.90
G-4 Imported topsoil & placement
450
3.30
1,485.00
450
3.03
1,363.50
450
2.49
1,120.50
G -5 Seed, fertilize & mulch
3305
3.30
10,906.50
3305
0.83
2,743.15
3305
1.23
4,065.15
TOTAL - GRADING & LANDSCAPING
$23,600.30
$10,913.15
$11,584.75
H. STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION
H -1 38 x 68 RCP extension w/ granular backfill
8
261.20
2,089.60
8
148.00
1,184.00
8
140.31
1,122.48
H -2 38 x 68 RCP endwall
1
3,515.00
3,515.00
1
4,800.00
4,800.00
1
4,592.00
4,592.00
H -3 Mechanical joint restraint for 38x68 RCP & endwall
1
457.00
457.00
1
275.00
275.00
1
511.00
511.00
H-4 Heavy riprap
190
23.00
4,370.001
190
32.37
6,150.30
190
40.28
7,653.20
H -5 Type HR geotextile
110
3.25
357.50
110
9.20
1,012.00
110
1.53
168.30
H-6 43 x 68 RCP storm sewer w /granular backfill
40
237.60
9,504.00
40
390.00
15,600.00
40
257.46
10,298.40
H -7 96 in. storm sewer manhole w /frame & cover
1
5,049.00
5,049.00
1
10,500.001
10,500.00
1
10,164.00
10,164.00
H-8 15 in. RCP storm sewerw /granular backfill
45
39.25
1,766.25
45
79.00
3,555.00
45
84.95
3,822.75
H -9 12 in. RCP storm sewerw /granular backfill
45
29.65
1,334.25
45
76.00
3,420.00
45
82.68
3,720.60
H -10 48 in. dia. Storm sewer manhole w/frame & cover
1
2,313.00
2,313.001
1
2,540.00
2,540.00
1
3,462.00
3,462.00
TOTAL - STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION
$30,755.60
$49,036.30
$45,514.73
TOTAL BID COST
$890,966.05
$1,281,868.57
$1,106,888.70
ALTERNATE BID ITEMS
Alt. 1 Decorative railing
700
229.82
160,875.00
700
415.00
290,500.00
700
145.02
101,514.00
Alt.2 Brick aver border
1679
6.60
11,081.40
1679
15.00
25,185.00
1679
16.29
27,350.91
Alt.3 Walkway curb head
1679
10.12
16,991.48
1679
10.00
16,790.00
1679
9.58
16,084.82
Alt. 4 Addrl general grading & soil import/export to obtain site
grades assoc. w /walkway curb head alt.
1
10,207.35
10,207.35
1
2,000.001
2,000.00
1
2,551.00
2,551.00
Alt. 5 Alternate sheetpile.
1
478,914.00
478,914.00
1
85,000.00
85,000.00
1
525,801.00
525,801.00
Alt. 6 Clear dockwall driving line
15
300.00
4,500.00
15
420.00
6,300.00
15
167.39
2,510.85
5% BID BOND
yes
yes
yes
Addendum 1
yes
yes
es
Phe inc
May 20, 2010
Aecom
Attn: Terry Peterson
Terry. Peterson@aeco m. com
Terry:
133 S Fieldcrest Dr I Neenah, WI 54956 1 p: 92o.969.2200 I f: 92o.969.2204
Following is the additional information you requested on behalf of the City of Oshkosh
for the Riverside Park Phase 2 Seawall & Riverwalk Construction project.
Alt #1 — Decorated Railing: Originally quotes painted $229.82/lf = $160,875.00
Railing finished in stainless steel $307.97/lf= $215,578.00
Alt # 5 — Alternate Sheetpiling using SCZ19 steel sheet pile with matching walers,
cap and tie rods. * Specification sheet is attached *
If you or City representatives would like further information, I'd be happy to provide.
Please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Rod Paul
Project Manager
rpaul@phenco.com
920.428.3226
�g-�
��
M c Y B@ R
www.phenco.com
Specializing in unique and diverse construction solutions
An Equal Opportunity Employer"
skylinesfeel
Technical Hotline: 1- 866- 875 -9546
engineering @skylinesteel.com
www.skylinesteel.com
03/08
SKZ /SCZ
SKZ/SCZ Cold Formed Steel Sheet Piling
t
h
w w 77,
SKZ /SCZ
SCZ 14
2850
10.00
0250
4.18
WEIGHT
1423
14.36
COATING AREA
6.10
1.28
7239
Cross
64
Section
Moment of
69.50
772
Width
Height
Thickness
Sectional
Modulus
Inertia
0.276
4.62
Both
Coating
15.75
(w)
(h)
(t)
Area
PUG
Wall
70
97.79
Sides
Area
847
in
in
Win
Inz/ft
lb/ft
lb/ft'
in /ft
in /ft
11
ft' /R
SECTION-
(mm)
(mm)
(kWm)
(cm21m)
(kq/m)
(kg/m ?)
(cm' /m)
(cm'!m)
(mW /m)
(me /m')
SKZ 20
28.50
16.00
0.315
UO
48.24
2031
31.69
253.51
7.50
1.60
7.86
723.9
406.4
ao
13620
71.79
99.17
1704
34618
232
1.60
SKZ 22
28.50
16.00
0.335
6.30
51.30
21.60
33.43
267.40
7.60
1.60
18.74
723.9
4064
as
145.40
76.34
105.46
1197
36515
2.32
1.60
SKZ 23
28.50
16.00
0.354
6.70
54.20
71.82
35.61
284.90
7.60
1.60
19.85
723.9
4064
9.0
162.50
80.66
111.42
1915
38905
2.32
1.60
SKZ 24
28.50
16.00
0.375
SCZ 22
57.43
24.18
37.73
30].80
7.60
1.60
29.76
723.9
406.4
9.5
85.47
118.06
2028
41213
232
1.60
SKZ 25
2850
16.00
0.399
H7,60
61.10
25.73
40.14
32t.t2
760
1.60
31.62
723.9
4064
10.1
80.93
12a 67
2158
43857
2.32
1.60
SCZ 14
2850
10.00
0250
4.18
33.81
1423
14.36
71.82
6.10
1.28
7239
254
64
88.48
50.31
69.50
772
9808
1.86
728
SCZ ] 6
28.50
10.00
0.276
4.62
37.37
15.73
15.75
7833
6.10
1.28
7219
254
70
97.79
55.61
76.82
847
10751
1.86
1.28
SCZ 17
29.95
10.13
0.315
5.16
43.66
1757
16.86
88.77
6.32
1.27
760.8
2573
8.0
109.22
65.27
85.79
906
12122
1.93
1.27
SCZ 18
29.95
-- 073 - 3'9 -
5.
6.67
i
7.86
. 7
7608
2573
8.5
116.21
69.45
91.28
960
12356
1.93
1.27
SCZ 19
29.95
10.13
0.354
5.80
49.30
19.75
18.74
94.92
6.32
1.27
760.8
257.3
9.0
122.77
73.37
98.43
1006
12962
1.93
1.27
SCZ 21
29.95
10.13
0.375
6.14
52.19
20.91
19.85
100.55
6.32
1.27
760.8
257.3
9.5
129.96
77.67
102.10
1067
13731
1.93
1.27
SCZ 22
24.02
13.39
0.315
6.43
43.81
21.89
29.76
199.19
5.91
1.48
610
340
10
13620
65.19
106.90
1600
27200
1.80
1.48
SCZ 23
24.02
13.38
0.335
6.87
46.84
23.35
31.62
223.63
5.91
1.48
610
340
8.5
145.40
69.70
114.00
1700
28900
1.80
1.48
SCZ 25
24.02
13.39
0.354
727
49.60
24.78
33.48
244 .08
5.91
1.48
610
340
9.0
153.95
73.80
121.00
1800
30600
1.80
1.48
SCZ 26
24.02
13.39
0.375
7.68
52.28
26.22
35.34
236.53
5.91
1.48
610
340
9.5
162.50
77.80
128.00
1900
32300
1.80
1.48
SCZ 29
24.02
13.39
0.413
8.48
57.92
28.88
39.06
261.43
5.91
1.48
610
340
10.5 1
179.50 1
86.20
141.00
2100
35700
1.80
1.48
SCZ 30
24 .02
13.39
0.433
8.88
60.68
30.31
40.92
273.88
5.91
1.48
670
340
17.0
7860 0
90.30
148.00
2200
37400
1.80
1.48
Product Data Sheet
SKZ/SCZ Cold Formed Steel Sheet Piling