HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-Building (shed) CITY OF OSHKOSH N°_ 26365
PERMIT - APPLICATION AND RECORD
TYPE: BLDG HTG ❑ ELEC ❑ PLBG ❑ S IGN ❑ ZONING FLOOD PLAIN HEIGHT
ADDRESS /O S .-- ���t/
51477 PLAN NO.
OWNER ( Ar�
DESI N G�
G ERj�
USE /NATURE OF WORK__ __S t' X Z 4 _ .4‘........4
BUILDING CONTRACTOR 0107 W—
Size O C k / Sq. Ft. q ! G # Rooms ( # Stories ( Height
Foundation A. Class of Const. O Occupancy Permit
HEATING CONTRACTOR
Heat ❑ A/C ❑ Vent ❑ Fuel /System Heat Loss BTU'S
ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR
Electric Serv. New ❑ Change ❑ Temp ❑ Type Volts Amps
Fixtures Switches Receptacles Circuits
PLUMBING CONTRACTOR
BT WH Disp WSoft CBasin
Lay _ Sh DW DF San. Sewer
____WC FDr SP Ur Storm Sewer
Sink LTub Eject SS Water
Other
FEES: Valuation $ _ . o c7 Permit Fee Paid $ /6 • D d / Park Dedication $
ISSUED BY Ye �ti./ .0.,cL...
Date // 7F/ Final /O. P.
In the performance of this work I agree to perform all work pursuant to rules governing the described construction.
SIGNATUR ■∎i i/. //I/ . _ A: , i
' A, ER ' DATE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE #
R 8/89
ZONING /LAND USE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
JOB LOCATION: orb c / ZONING:
PROPERTY OWNER /CONTRACTOR: _1 C�' /sd� 1�
CONSTRUCTION DATA: - NEW CON RUCTI{N A ION ALTEReION PARKING LOT
TYPE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: (i.e. fence, pool, sign, deck, etc.)
i
COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST (Check only those applicable)
COMPLIES DEFICIENT DEFICIENCY /COMMENTS
Use
Lot Width
Lot Area
Floodplain
Front Yard
Side Street (front yard)
Rear Yard
Side Yard (R)
Side Yard (L)
Parking Spaces
Building Area •
Lot Area Per Family
Corner Lot
Landscaping
Transitional Yard
Off-Street Loading •
Vision Clearance
Height
REVIEW AUTHORITY:
The Director of Community Development, or designee, must approve all plans, except the
following: (1) Alterations or work when the use is conforming and when no change
in use is proposed. (2) Maintenance items, e.g. siding, windows, etc., when the use is
conforming and when no change is proposed.
Instances where work complies with the above criteria, the permit can be reviewed by the
Building Inspector without referral to the Director of Community Development, or designee.
APPROVED DENIED
Plan Commission Action Required
Variance(s) Required
. REVIEWED BY: DATE:
•
---
I' I I I , I I al
• i T I !!! ! !! ! III 11-/ --- .�. - _ ME _ - 111 _I■■1■II R 1
■ ■N I■■i ■1111■I : l t �'i� NMI � , _
- .._ _ __ i■■■l►■■i■IIII■ ■■r ' ' - , . .
1
i i simmoramounion . . • i, a 1 _ � ■■!- ■i'■II ■■■® .
■■r m■ilii®■■om■ 1 I ! ! , • ■■ lII11 ■■ ! , . .
•
■■ '' II11 ■■ i 1 i
1 '
' I■■
■ I I B EN '
• 1
11 1111111111111111 1 1 ! 1 11I1■ � + -
■ i 1■■■■■■■ ; OH
1 ■■a■I■■■■ ■■ In 1 • i .
- ■ ■ 1■■■■■■■ ! 11111 —
-- ' ` ■ 1 ill■■■■■■■ I r ■ j �=� ' a
• 1■■ a • i 1 MI
i i - -- 1111111111111113. G I . . i _ ; ;
i
! I 1 111 i 11111111111= NU : . 2 .._. _____
; ■ mi11111111 , , ,
. , __,__ __ , ,__ ...
-. _ L , -,-4 -,--•
. , , ,
I -' - --
r ..
L ,
' ! ; + r --
i s oul 3 _4 A... .._ i. i • _ _
, i : .1 1
I , 1 i .
1 �
1 ! 1 4- 1 __ ___ ___
. 4___
1 1 - i 1 i 1! I .1 1 1 ��! 1 i I . :.
Sc
4_ I ! ' .. I ■■ ■s� 111 ■■■ _- 1 ,
__, ________ ________ ..___ __
J _ 1_ it. :. :,_ 0 _ I _i _ __,,,, i_
:1 L ,T i 1 11=11111 - 1
_ vv■ ■ •
4 _l_ I ' ' 111111.1111.1111.1111111111111
I 1 1 1
_ 111.1111111111111111MNIMMII - _t_
--I REIHIMPIMEMINIMIMEM - 1 ‘ C‘ ISIEUrilliErapari ,:„....2 io
- ▪ -1-- - - -'I- - 1 ! P Biamom i _i____ i __H il -- 1
, ,
. _..._ , l num
I , v, i i. .__I
. 1 , x, i i __, -4
c — - 1111111111111 a _________ _ 4 _
■ ■ ■t� ■ ■■ ■ _l_
lU$UR.1_0 ' ' 1 'D a Z
. -1--- 1 1111111111111111111111___,_0 1111 Al
2 ; 3 ,
. , . 1 _ �
.....---1 r 1 ....,„
, ,
._ ,
I i
+ 4 ` - - I to ct¢
Z '
i i 1 , E.
:, �- ,- :x, _
;11 - i i - {►
! ' 4
I i i r i i
1 t t I mo. _ .
r
. . , - - i I . -
i
•
STAFF REPORT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
NOVEMBER 20, 1991
ITEM III. 805 RANDALL PLACE - Jon and Nancy Ludwig, owners
GENERAL DESCRIPTION /BACKGROUND
Applicants are requesting a variance to construct a utility
storage building with a 12 foot front yard setback; whereas
Section 30- 15(b)(2) R -1 Single Family Residential of the City of
Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance requires a 25' front yard setback for
accessory structures when attached to or less than 5 feet from a
principal structure.
The surrounding land use pattern can be characterized by a single
family dwelling use with a C -3 Commercial Zoning district to the
north, south, and east and an R -5 Multiple Dwelling district to
the west.
On November 6, 1991, this item was before the Board of Zoning
Appeals for review. However, the item was laid over in that the
applicants, or their representative, was not present to answer
questions and the Board felt it was necessary to have someone
present to answer any questions they may have.
ANALYSIS /RECOMMENDATION FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
In reviewing a variance request, the following question should be
addressed. Is there an unusual or unique characteristic about
the subject property which creates a hardship? Is the hardship
self- created? Is the variance being requested the least possible
to remove any hardship? Will granting of the variance have a
considerable adverse impact on the neighboring properties?
The lot in question is a small double frontage lot which contains
a single family dwelling without an accessory structure present.
The lot size is approximately 44x75 for 3300 sq. ft. of area. It
appears that it would be extremely difficult to place an
accessory structure on the lot in question without a variance due
to the lack of available land area for this purpose.
The lots on either side of the lot in question contain garages
which do not meet current -day setback standards.
The area proposed for structural placement is in the only area
available for this purpose on this lot. The proposed structure
is 8x12 for 96 sq. ft. and is the minimum size needed for the
applicant's purpose of storage of residentially associated
equipment and material.
The proposed setbacks are also the minimum setbacks required to
be permitted to place the proposed 8x12 storage structure on the
lot in question.
STAPP REPORT PAGE TWO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
NOVEMBER 20, 1991
Approval of this variance would not appear to have an adverse
effect on the neighborhood.
Based on this information, Staff recommends approval of the
variance as requested.
•