The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0011378-Building (carport)PERMIT — APPPI- 19ATION AND RECORD I Address zy G Z t "lock Ward Type of Permit: Building of r o V Electrical ❑ Heating ❑ Plumbing ❑ PLUMBING CONTRACTOR Bu. San. Sewer Curb Bu. Bu. St. Sewer Curb to Bu. Main to Curb: Main to Curb. CITY OF OSHKOSH N° 113 7 8 Owner Id. No. Subdivision Zoning Flood Plain 9�0 Sign ❑ Wrecking ❑ Occupancy Permit Insp. Permit Date BUILDING Use General Cont. Water Service Sewer Fees Bath Tub Floor Drain Urinal Wash Basin _ Garbage Disp. S. Sink Water Closet Dish Washer Catch Basin Kit. Sink Laundry Mach. S. Pump Water Heater Water Soft. B & S Waste Shower Bath Bubbler Conductors Plumbing Fees Total Fees HEATING CONTRACTOR`- -- Fuel: Gas ❑ Oil ❑ Elec. ❑ Solar ❑ Solid ❑ Conditioning Forced Air ❑ H. W. ❑ Elec. Base ❑ Steam ❑ Radiant ❑ System Gravity ❑ Supplementary ❑ Air Cond. ❑ Ventilation Cl Chimney: "A" ❑ "B" ❑ Direct Vent ❑ Con. Burner ❑ Calculated Heat Loss System BTU Rating ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR Electric Service: New Changes Description -Type Fixtures Switches Appliances Electrical Signs Temp. Volts Amps Recep's Circ's Roof Siding z L 'Z -- Foundation Type of Construction Size: �/� L feet wide X' 1 -� feet long Square feet area Height: _.� Stories an ent %� feet above Grade 7 " Width of Lot 4 �J(' a 0 y v Q No. of Rooms Mason Carpenter Architect Inspections - Footing Foundation Electric Service R.I, Sewer Water Service Final Estimated Cost Fees Paid � w�c� _ Date TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR: In accordance with Section 7-18 of the Municipal Code of the City of Oshkosh, it is agreed that if work shall be discontinued for a period of 30 days at any time for any cause after excavation work is commenced, a solid barrier, wall, or wire fence not less than five feet in height shall be erected all around such excavation. Such barrier, wall or wire fence will remain in position until removal is approved by the Building Inspector. X In the performance of this work the undersigned agrees to abide by and do work pursuant to all statutes, ordinances codes, and rules governing the described construction. (Signed) Owner Address By-)(-- Address '00 W. 7 '� ave. Pho Phone 23 Agent 5`• s" LET L I vz / #, A -1 �'V p R H 47 FE�1vCt iFj"", PoPosEo o-f owe r r 7r St4 Kc,-S � W +S. S L: L,"7- H :• "� • • w ... a ., WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1982 MEMBERS PRESENT: Elaine Cartwright (alternate), Daniel Goldthwaite, Tom King, James Larson (alternate), Harry Luebke, Norman Miller STAFF PRESENT: Phil Rosenquist, Associate Planner Darlene Matulle, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order and the minutes of October 6, 1982 were ap- proved as recorded. I. Appeal of Dorothy Schroeder, owner of the property at 920 W. 9th _ Avenue (R -2 Zone), proposes to erect a carport addition to an exist- ing house. The carport supports would be 1' 9" from the side pro- perty line, whereas 4.75' reduced side yard setback is required. Mr. Rosenquist stated that the appellant is proposing to construct a carport. He continued that the carport would be attached to the home and requires principal building setbacks. As per the appellant's site plan, a 1'9" side yard setback is proposed whereas a 4.75' reduced side yard setback, or 10% of the lot width, is required. Mr. Rosenquist stated that a variance was unanimously granted for a carport in 1979 but the construction did not take place within the six month period so the variance is being requested again. Mr. George Reischl, 801 W. 7th Avenue, who is a nephew of Ms. Dorothy Schroeder, owner of the property at 920 W. 9th Avenue, stated that Ms. Schroeder would like to purchase a carport from. Sears. He stated that the approximate size of the carport is 10 x 20 and is 60 lbs. per square foot. Mrs. Cartwright inquired if the carport were enclosed? Mr. Reischl stated that just the back side would be enclosed for storage purposes. Mrs. Cartwright inquired into a discrepency in the 1979 variance request and the present request. She stated that a 2' sideyard setback was requested in 1979 and now a 1' 9" side yard setback was being requested. Why the difference? Mr. Reischl stated that he was under the assumption that the figures were the same. Mrs. Cartwright inquired if the carport would be constructed within the six month period? i Mr. Reischl replied yes. Ms. Schroeder stated that there were some family problems that did not allow them to start after the granting of the variance in 1979. Mr. King inquired if the house was constructed prior to 1965? �Mr. Reischl replied yes. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MIlVU'I'ES OCTOBER 20, 1982 MEET'IIQG PAGE TWO Mr. King inquired if other houses in the area had garages? Mr. Reischl replied that there were other garages in the area. Mr. King inquired if the carport would cause any detriment to any other neigh- bors? Mr. Reischl stated that he had spoken with the neighbors and they had no objec- tions. Dan Goldthwaite made a motion to approve the variance as requested. Motion seconded by Tom King. Motion approved 5 -0. II. Discussion and Adoption of Procedures and Regulations for the Board of Zoning Appeals. Chairman Miller opened the floor for discussion on the Procedures and Regula- tions for the Board of Zoning Appeals. Discussion ensued on various items contained in the proposed procedures and regulations. Concern was expressed regarding Article II, paragraph 1 on alter- nate members voting in the absence of a regular member or when a regular member refuses to vote because of interest. Mr. Rosenquist stated that when the situa- tion arises, which is not too often, that member usually contacts the office and an alternate member is then contacted. Article II does not appear to indicate that an alternate be present at all times. Considerable discussion ensued regarding Article VII Guides and Standards for a Zoning Variance. Mr. King pointed out that these proposed procedures and regulations are intended as a guideline for the granting of a variance. He referred to Section 30 -24 The Powers of the Board of Appeals, of the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance. Tom King made a motion to change the word "shall" to "should" in Article VII, paragraph 1, sentence 1. Motion seconded by Dan Goldthwaite. Motion approved 6 -0. Article VII, paragraph 1, sentence 1 shall read as follows: 111. A variance from the terms of this Ordinance should not be granted by the Board unless and until it is determined that such a variance will not be contrary to the public inter- est and where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provi- sions of this Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship." The remaining sections of Article VII shall remain the same. Considerable discussion followed regarding the number of times that an appeal may be brought before the Board. It was the consensus of the Board to retain the number of times that an appeal may be brought before the Board, that being three times in any 12 month period. Dan Goldthwaite made a motion to approve the Procedures and Regulations for the Board of Zoning Appeals as amended. Motion seconded by Tom King. Motion approved 6-0. OWNER �� 2 ��C �° ADDRESS DATE /lr�'� -- PERMIT # ' r USE WOZ ENE -U CONTRACTOR /1if(r "o s+ O w 0 s 4W a m a fists o MASON . CONTRACTOR ZONE Width of DATE INSPECTIONS Front of lot l %0 REIIARKS MAILING ADDRESS