Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-49FEBRUARY 10, 2009 09 -49 RESOLUTION (CARRIED 4 -3 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN ) AS AMENDED PURPOSE: GIVE DIRECTION REGARDING RECYCLING MATERIALS A) MANUAL COLLECTION / DUAL STREAM RECYCLING B) MANUAL COLLECTION / SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING C) AUTOMATED COLLECTION / SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the City of Oshkosh that city staff is hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the steps necessary to pursue the following option for the collection of recycling materials within the City of Oshkosh: 4\ MANUAL COLLECT ECTION / DUAL STREAM RECYCLING B) MANUAL COLLECT ECTION / S STREAM RECYCL C) AUTOMATED COLLECTION / SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING AMENDED TO DELETE CHOICES A & B COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS VARIABLE COST CALCULATION FEBRUARY 2009 Dual Stream Single Stream Single Stream /Manual _ Ran-,I (Manual - Bins) (Automated - Carts) 9 Year Total Cost (C +O) +$92,400 +$92,400 +$106,260 Vehicle Purchase 3 vehicles $462,000 $154k /vehicle $462,000 $154k /vehicle $705,000 $235k /vehicle Additional Equipment Manual Tipping Devices +$0 +$0 +$12,000 2 vehicle Additional Tipping Fee - Deba Bag cost borne by Bin cost borne by $1,100,000 Cart Purchase resident * resident ** - $2,068 Reduced Garbage Volume/ $0 $0 ( +5% = 183 ton) Total Capital Costs (C) $462,000 $462,000 $1,817,000 9 Year Total Cost (C +O) +$92,400 +$92,400 +$106,260 Vehicle Maintenance $256,053 ( *) $237,733 ( * *) +15% +$18,320 +$0 +$0 Additional Tipping Fee - Deba 3664 tons x $5 /ton - $2,068 Reduced Garbage Volume/ $0 $0 ( +5% = 183 ton) Increased Recycling Volume 183 x $11.30 /ton +$34,000 +$34,000 +$23,800 Worker Compensation 100% 100% 70% +$60,000 +$60,000 - $120,000 Labor /Benefit Expense +1 FT Employee) (+1 FT Employee) (-2 FT Employees Total Yearly Variable Operating Expense (0) +$204,720 +$186,400 +$7,992 9 Year Total Cost (C +O) $2,304,480 ( *) $2,139,600 ( * *) $1,888,928 Average Variable Cost per Year (C +O) - (9) $256,053 ( *) $237,733 ( * *) $209,880 COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS COST SUMMARY COMPARISON FEBRUARY 2009 Dual Stream Single Stream Single Stream /flA -mn11nl _ Rnncl (Manual - Rinsl (Automated - Carts) * Bag cost borne by resident * *Bin cost borne by resident C +$462,000 C +$462,000 C +$1,817,000 YEAR 1 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 2 O +$204,720 O +$186 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 3 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 4 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 5 O +$204,720 O +$186 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 6 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 7 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 8 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 C $0 C +$0 C $0 YEAR 9 O +$204,720 O +$186,400 O +$7,992 TOTAL $2,304,480* $2,139,600 ** $1,888,928 * Bag cost borne by resident * *Bin cost borne by resident CITY HALL 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130 City of Oshkosh OfHKOfH DATE: February 6, 2009 TO: Mark A. Rohloff City Manager FROM: David C. Patek e� Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM RE: Explanation of Cost Calculation for Collection of Recyclable Materials Per our discussion, I am writing to provide additional clarification regarding the various assumptions for the three recyclable material collection options. The costs are divided into capital costs and operating expenses. The assumptions are explained as follows: Capital Costs . • Manual collection is completed with a two - person crew and rear loading vehicles. • Automated collection is typically completed with a one - person vehicle. • As part of the automated collection option, two manual tipping devices will be purchased for installation on spare rear loading vehicles. These spare vehicles would be utilized by a two - person crew when an automated vehicle requires maintenance. • The automated collection option assumes that the cart purchase expense is paid by city funds, but the manual collection options do not show any cost paid by homeowners for bags or bins. Variable Operating Expenses • The vehicle maintenance expense was increased by 15% for the automated collection vehicles. This increase was utilized by the City of Madison for their cost calculations. • The debag expense was increased from the previous estimated $2.50 /ton to $5 /ton. This increase assumes elimination of this service by other communities in Winnebago County. The $5 /ton figure is likely to be too low. Also, this expense does not account for any capital replacement costs for the old conveyor system at the Winnebago County transfer station. • The increased recycling volume calculation accounts for the less expensive recycling tipping fee ($15 /ton) versus landfill disposal ($26.30 /ton). The 5% recycling tonnage increase estimate is conservative versus the actual number seen in other communities (i.e. Madison saw 30% for 2 years). • The worker compensation expense was reduced by 30% for the automated collection option. This decrease is also conservative based on discussions with DePere and Madison • The labor /benefit expense accounts for the staffing needed for the manual versus automated collection options. The manual collection program requires an increase of one full -time employee to return to full staffing for the Sanitation Division. The automated collection program will also add one full -time employee, but show a net decrease of two full -time employees because of the conversion to single person vehicles. Additionally I am attaching statistics that show Oshkosh having the lowest per capita recycling rate among all incorporated communities in Winnebago County. Moving to an automated single stream collection program has proved to increase the participation rate in other communities. I hope this provides an explanation for the variable cost calculation and cost summary comparison pages. Let me know if you have any questions. DCP /clm Attachment rl ia� 4J o a o o >I—