HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-389SEPTEMBER 23, 2008
FIRST READING
(CARRIED 7 -0
PURPOSE:
INITIATED BY:
OCTOBER 14, 2008 08 -337 08 -389 ORDINANCE
SECOND READING
LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ZONINGS OF R -3 AND R -3 PD /
MIDWEST VOLUNTARY ATTACHMENT
OSHKOSH OFFICE BUILDING LLC
A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30 -14
(B) OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS.
The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. That Section 30 -14(B) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to
Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by adding thereto
the district character of the following described area.
MIDWEST VOLUNTARY ATTACHMENT
Attached to the 13th Ward on September 23, 2008
Zonings: R -3 Multiple Dwelling and R -3 PD Multiple Dwelling with a
Planned Development Overlay (per attached)
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication.
SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh
enacted Ordinance #08 -390 APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ZONINGS OF R -3 AND R -3
PD / MIDWEST VOLUNTARY ATTACHMENT on October 28, 2008. The Ordinance
applied permanent zoning of R -3 Multiple Dwelling and R -3 PD Multiple Dwelling with a
Planned Development Overlay. The full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the
Office of the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave. and on the City's website at
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us Clerk's phone: (920) 236 -5011.
MIDWEST VOLUNTARY ATTACHMENT - PERMANENT ZONINGS
[NOTE: All zonings go to the centerlines of W. 20th Ave. and Meadow Park Dr,]
Zoning: R -3 Multiple Dwelling
Part Of 20th Avenue And All Of Lot 1 Of Certified Survey Map Number 6070, Located In The
Northwest '/4 Of The Northeast '/4 And The Southwest '/4 Of The Northeast '/4 Of Section 32,
Township 18 North, Range 16 East, Town Of Algoma, Winnebago County, Wisconsin, Bounded
And Described As Follows: Beginning At The North '/4 Corner Of Section 32; Thence
S89 0 13'55 "E, 893.61 Feet Along The North Line Of The Northeast '/4 Of Section 32; Thence
S00 0 23'13 "W, 583.00 Feet; Thence S89 0 13'55 "E, 400.00 Feet; Thence S00 0 23'13 "W, 743.48
Feet; Thence S89 0 17'37 "E, 9.75 Feet To A Point On The East Line Of The West %2 Of The
Northeast '/4 Of Section 32; Thence S00 0 41'57 "W, 124.52 Feet Along Said East Line To The
South Line Of Said Lot 1; Thence N89 0 13'55 "W, 1316.91 Feet Along Said South Line To A
Point On The West Line Of The Northeast' /4 Of Section 32; Thence N00 0 56'56 "E, 1450.97 Feet
Along Said West Line To The North '/4 Corner Of Section 32 And The Point Of Beginning,
Excepting Therefrom the Following Described Property.
Zoning: R -3 Multiple Dwelling PD with a Planned Development Overlay
Being Part Of Lot 1 Of Certified Survey Map Number 6070 As Recorded In Volume 1 Of
Certified Survey Maps On Page 6070, Located In The Northwest '/4 Of The Northeast '/4 And
The Southwest '/4 Of The Northeast '/4 Of Section 32, Township 18 North, Range 16 East, City
Of Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin, Bounded And Described As Follows: Commencing
At The North '/4 Corner Of Section 32; Thence S00 °56'56 "W, 40.00 Feet Along The West Line
Of The Northeast' /4 Of Section 32 To The South Right Of Way Line Of W. 20 Avenue (C.T.H.
"K "); Thence S89 0 13'55 "E, 432.94 Feet Along Said South Right Of Way Line To The Point Of
Beginning; Thence Continuing S89 0 13'55 "E, 461.06 Feet Along Said South Right Of Way Line;
Thence S00 0 23'13 "W, 543.00 Feet; Thence S89 0 13'55 "E, 400.00 Feet; Thence S00 0 23'13 "W,
458.45 Feet; Thence S76 0 24'33 "W, 113.93 Feet To The Start Of A 250.00 Foot Radius Curve
To The Left; Thence Southwesterly 330.35 Feet Along The Arc Of Said Curve On A Chord
Which Bears S38 0 33'15 "W And Is 306.83 Feet In Length To The Termination Point Of Said
Curve; Thence S00 0 41'57 "W, 138.95 Feet; Thence N89 0 13'55 "W, 182.25 Feet; Thence
N00 0 46'05 "E, 175.74 Feet To The Start Of A 130.00 Foot Radius Curve To The Left; Thence
Northwesterly 93.24 Feet Along The Arc Of Said Curve On A Chord Which Bears N19 0 46'48 "W
And Is 91.26 Feet In Length To The Termination Point Of Said Curve; Thence N40 0 19'41 "W,
156.47 Feet To The Start Of A 70.00 Foot Radius Curve To The Right; Thence Northwesterly
17.56 Feet Along The Arc Of Said Curve On A Chord Which Bears N33 0 08'22 "W And Is 17.52
Feet In Length To The Termination Point Of Said Curve; Thence N25 0 57'03 "W, 578.61 Feet To
The Start Of A 70.00 Foot Radius Curve To The Right; Thence Northerly 32.64 Feet Along The
Arc Of Said Curve On A Chord Which Bears N12 0 35'29 "W And Is 32.35 Feet In Length To The
Termination Point Of Said Curve; Thence N00 0 46'05 "E, 444.01 Feet To The Beginning Of A 25
Foot Radius Curve To The Right; Thence Northeasterly 39.27 Feet Along The Arc Of Said
Curve On A Chord Which Bears N45 0 46'05 "E And Is 35.36 Feet In Length To A Point On The
South Right Of Way Line Of W. 20 Avenue (C.T.H. "K ") And The Point Of Beginning.
PERMANENT ZONING - MIDWEST VOLUNTARY ATTACHMENT
PROPOSED LOT 1 - R -3 Multiple Dwelling
PROPOSED LOT 2 - R -3 PD Multiple Dwelling with a
Planned Devel
W
UffjrlmAo" &?VlY F".' ice— - . -
PAGE 6o77o0LOCCAATED N THE R 1/44 OF��NORTHEAST RECORDED THE SO OF CERTIFI NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, COY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY. WISCONSIN.
NORTH 1/4 CORNER NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
'1/4 OF SECTION 32 -18-16
SECTION 32 -18 716
]l. 20TH AYE (�T.E " 1FIDTH PAM
w cao y353'F
—282f. 18'— w
• �o '3s9'135 89400" • w --
`' +. 322.314' C
j a A �12' unurr laov' 1 unurrr o SECT NA32
c
\ $ EASEMENT EASEMENT a
UNPLATTED LAWS I I uNPLnrrm LANDS t
LOT z w Ro1#RT M. JAR do ( EDNN IJUFLLFR I
Z X \ w 714,696 DORIS. SOfT.t DOR GRIM 1�
N 2 � (194072 AWM1 I a
= c gym_ 25' WETLANDS $ I
a x Bl �R � ; - •.: BUFFER S89'f335' 40000'
a� eP vi cr ............................
oFPARK .n �soj
� q T TO THE PU LIC ; ; y
X; \ DEDICATED �' FOR ROAD PURPOSES
91.665 SQ.FLf (221043 LO I
o
S m
$�
PA ' j. 707,0111 SOf - 15 47'
o 1 . 161514 Ad1ESf a+�p/� ss •17',F7E
g w z 1 54rw A75'
J
(500'43'1211')
U N E
.o, CENtER ;
RVALF .'��
f82.25'
S004f71V
12452`
LOT 1 I
� 3- �
OF LIMIT
(3i 78�
LOT 2
CSM 4446 I
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF wMMDS PER NATURAL
TEMPORARY 60 RADIUS
I CS 5�7
RESOURCES CONSULTING, INC. do
FIELD LOCATION (TYPICAL)
CUL DE SAC EASEMENT
TO BE REMOVED WHEN
"SEE SHEET' 2 OF 4 SHEETS 'FOR DUAL
THE ROAD IS EXTENDED
OF THIS AREA AND CURVE TABLE'
m
Q� 6d9�
OWNERS OF RECORD:
V
OSHKOSH OFFICE BUILDING. LIZ
0
I
� /
G%
TAX PARCEL NO: 0020401
LEGEND:
• = 3/4' X 24' SOLD ROUND IRDN REBAR
SET. .WEIGHING 1.502 LES. PER EMI. FL
®� 3/4' SOLID ROUND IRON REBAR FOUND
®@ 1' LD. ROUND IRON PIPE- FOUND
BERNMEN MONUMENT FOUND
() = RECORDED AS BD MIG/DISTANCE
EXISTING FENCE
®= CHISEL CROSS FOUND
GAPNAW SCALE 1 • _ .3Q0'
0 f50 300 450 Coo -
.300
.NORTH IS REFERENCED TO THE NORTH LIKE OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH,
RANGE 16 EAST. TOWN OF ALBOMA. WINNEBAGO COUNTY,
WISCONSIN. WHICH BEARS S89'1355'E PER THE WINNEBAGO
COUP COORDINATE SYSTEIA' SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS
r � tS GUNS. l �1,� '4
THOMAS F. '•., .
. HALVERSON ''
{r 5.1445
ppPLETON, r r�
THOMAS F. HALVERSON. RL5-1445 DATED
CAROW LAND SURVEYING CO., INC.
615 N. LYNNDALE DR., P.O. BOX 1297
APPLETON. WISCONSIN 54912 -1297
PHONE: (920)731 -4168
A067.31 -08 8- 19-08.
DRAFTED BY. (RDO)
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Jackson Kinney
Director of Community Development
DATE: October 9, 2008
RE: Approval of Permanent Zoning of R -3 and R -3 PD for Midwest
Voluntary Attachment
Oshkosh Office Building LLC, owner
(Plan Commission Recommendation: Approved)
BACKGROUND
On February 26, 2008 (Ord. 08 -72) Council. approved the attachment of this 37+ acre parcel of
land on the south side of W. 20th Avenue from the Town of Algoma with temporary zoning of
R -3 Multiple Dwelling. The owner requested attachment to obtain municipal services for future
single and multiple family residential developments.
The owner is now requesting permanent zonings of R -3 Multiple Dwelling for the western half
of the parcel and R -3 PD Multiple Dwelling with a Planned Development Overlay for the eastern
half.
ANALYSIS
The property in question is within the designated expansion area of the approved Cooperative
Plan between the City and the Town of Algoma and can be attached to the City. The
Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as appropriate for residential use.
FISCAL IMPACT
Sewer and water service is available from 20 Avenue and would be the developer's
responsibility to extend these lines to service the development. City services are provided to
properties to the adjacent east and generally to the north across 20 Avenue.
The subject property was assessed by the Town of Algoma at $89,900. The assessed land values
in the City will be naturally higher based on the developed value of the land but is indeterminate
at this time due to there not being any proposed or approved development plans for the property.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission approved this request at its September 2, 2008 meeting.
ITEM: ZONE CHANGE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT
PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CREATION OF A MULTIPLE FAMILY
APARTMENT AND TWO FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED AT 3127 WEST 20 AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of September 2, 2008.
When reviewed by the Plan Commission, this item also included a request for a land division,
street dedication, and access control variance.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Thomas Halverson, Carow Land Surveying
Owner: Oshkosh Office Building, LLC
Actions Requested:
1) A zone change request to add a planned development overlay district (PD) to
. I approximately 16.4 acres of land currently zoned R -3, to establish an R -3PD zone.
2) Approval of a conditional use permit/development plan for a development that includes the
following:
Seven 8 -unit apartment buildings (56 units)
Fourteen two- family condominium structures (28 units)
950 linear feet of private roadway
One detention pond
Open spaces including wooded wetlands
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning
from one classification to another but relies on the Comprehensive Plan and sound planning
principles. The Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria and guidelines for the establishment of a PD
overlay district in Section 30 -33 (A)(1),
Property Location and Type:
The subject 16.4 -acre property is currently in agricultural usage and is located on the south side of
West 20 Avenue on the city's westerly border with the Town of Algoma, approximately one -half
mile east of Clairville Road. The property is bordered on the west and east by the Town of
Algoma, in the 20 -year expansion area. The property to the north across West 20 Avenue is Carl
Traeger Elementary/Middle School and Oakbrook Church. Land to the south is undeveloped. The
YMCA is adjacent to the west and Griese Construction is to the east.
Subject Site
Erstzna�'se
Agricultural/Undeveloped
R -3
acent Land Use and
North Institutional (across 20" Avenue
South_ Agricultural
East _
West Recreational
R -1
ETZ M -3
ETZ A-2
ETZ C -1
Col�prehensve Plan: Z�nd °' use R�cafiitnen�ahan :Zane
I�s�
10 Year Land Use Recommendation
Residential
20 Year Land Use Recommendation
Residential
ANALYSIS
Rezoning
The petitioner is requesting approval to rezone the subject property's existing R -3 Multiple
Dwelling District zoning designation with a Planned Development Overlay District. The purpose
of rezoning is to allow a conditional use /planned development to create an apartment building
complex and multiple two -unit condominium buildings on a single property, utilizing a private
roadway system. Planned Development designation is necessary as it can incorporate base
standard modifications to allow the use of a private road for access and for the placement of more
than one two - family structure on a single lot.
Design/Lao
The proposed plan includes development of seven eight -unit two -story apartment buildings (56
units) on the northern portion of the parcel and 14 two - family condominium structures (28 units)
on the southern portion of the parcel for a total of 84 units. Density can be considered low at
approximately 5.12 units per acre (one unit per 8,500 square feet), which is approximately 2.8
times less than the density that would be permitted within the regular R -3 zoning designation (14.5
units per acre, one unit per 3,000 square feet). Green space constitutes 67% of the site while
impervious surfaces (roads & buildings) constitute approximately 33% of the total land area.
The apartment complex is designed as a campus with three of the seven buildings in the center of
the development area bordered on the north and south with the remaining 4 buildings. A small
area of greenspace is adjacent to each building. Each apartment building contains eight two -
bedroom apartments each with a single garage space and shared 14 open stalls located on the
buildings ends.
The two - family condominiums are designed as side -by -side attached units, each with a two -stall
garage and space for parking two vehicles within the driveways. The driveways are proposed to
have a 44 foot wide access onto the private roadway. Staff recommends that the individual
driveways be separated with a minimum of a four foot greenspace as would be required if
developed per zoning code. This should help to create a more defined separation of units and not
be problematic in that there is five feet of separation between the garage doors.
Item - 3127 W20' Change and CUP /PD
Building Elevations
The apartment buildings are two -story buildings with an overall height of approximately 27 feet.
The inclusion of front and rear dormers and porch roofs as well multiple roof lines on the building
sides help to break up the overall mass of the main roof and provide building articulation. The
exterior is proposed to be primarily vinyl siding and will contain a three foot face brick knee wall.
Fagades also include entry doors, garage doors and multiple windows.
The two - family units are designed as single story structures with an overall height of 20 feet. The
home design places the garages and entries in the front of the structure and rear fagade includes
three roofs, two decks and multiple windows.
Access
Access to the entire development area will be provided by the proposed 60 foot local right -of -way
named Meadow Park Drive. Vehicular access to the apartment portion of the development is
proposed to be provided in the form of two driveways from said roadway. These drives would
circle within the complex to provide access to all the apartment buildings and parking areas and
also provide full circulation from drive to drive. Vehicular access to the two - family
condominiums is similarly provided by two driveways and through use of a private roadway
leading throughout the development area. Each of the 14 two - family units will access this private
roadway by 44 foot wide driveways.
Pedestrian walks are not currently located on West 20 Avenue and internal pedestrian walks are
not included within the development area. Staff believes that walks, at least five foot wide,
connecting all apartment buildings to the proposed Meadow Park Drive should be included within
the site design and also believes that a five foot wide sidewalk be included along the north side of
the private roadway to provide protected/safe pedestrian access to the walks to be located on the
local roadway.
Sinae
A subdivision/development sign is proposed at the southeast corner of the West 20 Avenue and
proposed Meadow Park Drive intersection. It is proposed to be an approximately six foot tall
monument sign with approximately 39 square feet of sign area. The proposed sign is situated to
meet setback requirements but exceeds the maximum of 24 square feet of area allowed by code.
Staff believes the sign is designed well and recommends a base standard modification to allow the
increased sign area.
Landscaping
A landscape plan has been submitted with the proposal. Landscaping appears to be consistent with
code but will be required to be reviewed at time of building permit issuance.
Stormwater Detention
Stormwater management is proposed in the form of a detention basin situated between the
apartment complex and the condominium portion of the development site. Formal erosion control,
drainage and stormwater management plans must be approved by the Department of Public Works
and staff suggests that a more "natural" style of detention basin be utilized involving planting of
emergent plants in the safety shelf area and native plants on the side slopes rather than the use of
riprap as it is better functioning, environmentally friendly, is a deterrent to intrusion and more
aesthetically pleasing.
Item - 3127 W 20` -Zone Change and CUPIPD
RECOMMENDATION /CONDITIONS
The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the zone change and
CUP/Development Plan for the multifamily apartment and two - family condominium development
with the following conditions;
1) Base standard modification to allow multiple two - family residential units on a single
parcel.
2) Base standard modification to allow four driveways onto one parcel.
3) The two - family condominium driveways are separated with a minimum of a four foot
greenspace.
4) Base standard modification to allow the subdivision/development sign, as proposed.
5) Provide pedestrian walks from the apartment buildings to Meadow Park Drive.
6) Provide a sidewalk along the north/east side of the private roadway.
7) Detention basins are designed without riprap above the water line and native plants be
planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety shelf.
The Plan Commission approved of the zone change and CUP/Development Plan as requested with
conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Mr. Burich presented the land division and right -of -way dedication and stated that this parcel was
formerly the Beck farm and the petitioner was requesting to divide the parcel into two lots for the
development of an apartment /condominium project which would be divided by the street
dedication of Meadow Park Drive. He also stated that Condition #4 relating to the land division
should state that the 20 foot wide easement centered swale required on Lot 1 not on Lot 2.
Mr. Buck presented the access control variance and stated that city ordinance limits parcels to a
maximum of two driveways on local and collector streets; however this development would
contain 56 units in eleven buildings so the additional driveway accesses do not seem excessive.
Mr. Buck also presented the zone change request from a standard R -3 district to establish an R-
3PD zone and the conditional use permit /development plan request for the construction of a private
roadway with multiple apartment buildings and condominium units. The proposed dedication of
Meadow Park Drive would serve the entire development.
Thomas Halverson, Carow Land Surveying, 615 N. Lynndale Drive, Appleton, stated that they did
not have any issues with the conditions for the land division and that he did realize that there were
some issues on the language on the CSM that needed to be addressed.
Ms. Mattox questioned if there would be walking trails incorporated around the stormwater areas.
Mr. Halverson replied that there were not formal plans for it at the present as the magnitude of size
of the detention areas was not there, but they may be able to integrate some trails at a later time.
The plans depict that 66% of the square footage of the development would be greenspace,
however, 75% of this is wetland area which cannot be filled or modified.
Item - 3127 W 2e -Zone Change and CUP/PD
Jeffrey Hafemeister, 3249 West 20th Avenue, stated that his property abuts the subject site on the
west side and he was concerned with the drive aisle along his property line due to noise issues. He
further stated that it appears. to be a nice development, but he was also concerned with any
elevation changes that could result in flooding issues. He also suggested that the developer create
a pathway going through their property leading to the YMCA site to prevent kids cutting through
his property to get to the facility. He also suggested that some fencing and some type of bushes or
trees be installed to separate his property from the development site. He also voiced his concern
with the lighting for the site as he did not want any spillover onto his property and he was also
wondering if these were going to be owner occupied units or rentals.
Mr. Halverson stated that the condominiums would be owner occupied units and that the lighting
along the drive aisles will be small light poles without any high intensity lighting on the site.
Mr. Buck added that code requires that lighting be .5 foot candles at the property line.
Mr. Halverson stated that the drive aisle on the west side of the property could not be eliminated as
fire codes required that access as they have a limit of 150 feet for fire hose reach.
Mr. Burich suggested that an enhanced level of landscaping could be placed along the property
line to help alleviate light and noise issues.
Mr. Halverson stated that he could look into the possibility of placing an easement leading to the
YMCA property, but he would have to discuss it with the DNR to see if they would approve it.
Mr. Fojtik stated that he would like to add a condition to Item IIIA to provide an easement on the
west side of the property for a path to the YMCA facility.
Mr. Borsuk questioned what the costs would be for the developer to provide this pathway.
Mr. Burich responded that it was better to request the easement at this point and look into whether
it is feasible later.
Motion by Esslinger to approve the land division/CSMfor property located at the south
side of 20th Avenue, west of 2979 West 20th Avenue and the right -of -way dedication for
Meadow Park Drive and the access control variance for additional driveways to Meadow
Park Drive as requested with the following conditions to be applied to Item IIIA:
1. The owner enters into a developer's agreement to facilitate construction ofpublic
utilities and street construction.
2. Grading and drainage plan to be submitted and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to building permit issuance.
3. 100 foot wide easement centered on the non - navigable ditch required.
4. 20 foot wide easement centered swale required on Lot 1.
5. Label Outlot I on first page of CSM.
6 All existing public and private easements as well as any proposed public and
private utility easements are shown /depicted on the C.S.M. prior to acceptance by
the city.
Item - 3127 W20"-Zone Change and CUP /PD
7. The applicant comply with all other plat development requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations.
8. Fees in lieu of parkland dedication be paid at time of building permit issuance.
9. Provide a 15' wide public path easement be provided on the west side of the
property for a pathway from the site to the YMCA facility as determined by the
Department of Community Development.
Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 5-0.
Jim Mueller, representing his mother Edna Mueller, 2949 West 20th Avenue, on the east side of
the development site, stated that she was concerned with the detention pond planned for the site
and how the water would be routed there. The ditch is frequently flooded in heavy storms and she
was concerned with flooding issues. She was also concerned with traffic going through her
property once the land to the south is developed.
Mr. Halverson responded that the detention pond would be located between the two lots and he did
not anticipate it creating any flooding issues. The stormwater runoff would be collected in the
stormwater sewer system between the condominiums and apartment buildings and then discharged
to the wetland area creating a more controlled runoff. The proposed road pattern was reviewed
With both the Planning and Engineering Departments and it was determined that the majority of
traffic would be utilizing Meadow Park Drive to access this site. He further stated that conditions
#3, 5 and 6 relating to providing pedestrian walks on the site would be taking 25% of the
greenspace away.
Mr. Burich questioned if some type of internal walkway system was planned to connect the
development.
Mr. Halverson replied that the private road could be widened with a striped pedestrian way along it
in lieu of separate sidewalks as the private road was not planned to have curbing either. They
could live with the present conditions if need be.
Mr. Borsuk voiced his concern over rear yard setbacks on outlot 1 to protect the industrial park
development to the south. He felt that the new development should be responsible for any
additional buffers or transitional yard setbacks for the residential site as the industrial park should
not be required to provide such screening as they were located there first.
Mr. Burich responded that he did not anticipate much development on outlot 1 as there was not
sufficient area for building construction, but if the area to the south would be developed, the issue
could be addressed at that time.
Mr. Hafemeister questioned if there was an economic need for more apartment buildings in the
community and how upscale would the units be.
Mr. Halverson replied that the structures would be similar to the units on Westhaven Drive
between Witzel Avenue and Highway 21. They will be nice looking buildings with eight units
each with some brick on the exterior. Marketing studies were completed that concluded the need
for apartments in this area mainly because of the presence of the school across the street.
Item - 3127 W20-Zone Change and CUP /PD
Mr. Dell'Antonia inquired why the entire development was not made up of all condominium units.
Mr. Halverson responded that with the presence of both the YMCA and the school in the area, they
were attempting to market their units to two different age groups -the young families as well as the
50 and older age group. They felt that the apartments would appeal more to the families where as
the condominiums would be marketed more towards older persons looking to downsize from the
family home.
Ms. Mattox asked if the development was being built on the basis of the city growing and the need
for more housing.
Mr. Burich replied that the developer was responding to marketing and economic studies that
determined there was a need for these housing units.
Ms. Mattox then asked what effect the new housing units would have on the older housing stock in
the community as she was supportive of attracting new people to the area and not just relocating
them from other housing units in the city.
Mr. Bunch responded that the city has not completed an analysis of this type of information and
the developer is reacting to marketing needs for the community. The issue here is to determine if
the land use is appropriate for the area and in any business, new competition will change the
market somewhat.
Mr. Fojtik stated that he felt the new development was a positive thing as it created variety and
options for residents in our community.
Mr. Buck added that according to the Comprehensive Plan, our community should be adding 260
new dwelling units per year.
Karen Hafemeister, 3249 West 20th Avenue, stated that she was concerned with the impact on the
storm sewers that this development would create and she also commented on the apartments on
Westhaven that were used as a comparison as they had additional amenities on their site, such as a
pool and clubhouse, that these units would not have. She was concerned with the type of residents
that the apartments would attract.
Mr. Halverson responded that this development was not large enough to support a clubhouse and
other amenities such as those on the Westhaven site.
Mr. Burich added that stormwater management requirements would have to be met for the new
development which should address any flooding issues created from the site.
Mr. Gohde stated that the development would be designed to meet ordinance which requires that
there be less stormwater runoff from the site than before it was developed.
Mr. Esslinger commented that the developer was constructing this project with all of their own
funds as they are not in a TIF district or receiving any city funding to help offset costs so they
obviously are confident that there is an economic need for these housing units.
Item - 3127 W20' Change and CUP /PD
Ms. Hafemeister questioned if this would all be developed at one time or if it would be constructed
in two separate phases.
Mr. Halverson replied that all three phases would be developed on the same time frame. This fall
they planned on constructing the road with the buildings getting under way by late next year.
Motion by Esslinger to approve the zone change to add a planned development overlay
district and a conditional use permit /development plan for a multiple family apartment and
condominium development at 3127 West 20th Avenue as requested with the following
conditions:
1) Base standard modification to allow multiple two-family residential units on a single
parcel.
2) Base standard modification to allow four driveways onto one parcel.
3) The two-family condominium driveways are separated with a minimum of a four foot
greenspace.
4) Base standard modification to allow the subdivision /development sign, as proposed.
5) Provide pedestrian walks from the apartment buildings to Meadow Park Drive.
6) Provide a sidewalk along the north /east side of the private roadway.
7) Detention basins are designed without riprap above the water line and native plants be
planted on the side slopes of the basin and emergent plants on the safety shelf.
Seconded by Borsuk. Motion carried 5 -0.
Item - 3127 W 20` Zane Change and CUPIPD
. 0
OJH<C n
ON THE WATER
City of Oshkosh Application
Rezoning
* *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK **
SUBMIT TO:
Dept of Community Development
215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 -1130
PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: '% Ef oA .4 S AI A 1-%J 0 S V J " C,40 0u) 1,-A J G $14 2 J.IE �t �N c. Date: 7 O R
Petitioner's Address: I P I S P . L Y x9A3 D A t.E VIZ City: Q JOA y0 TZLZ State: IJ 1 Zip: S Y9' I
Telephone #: (4 2 v) 73 I - &lI G S Fax: (g t 73 t - 5 I, *73 Other Contact # or Email:
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): D Owner representative Tenant E Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required):
Date:
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): O S K tc o S H O t= OI C. E u c. D iy G L v c. Date:
Owner(s) Address ST - _ City: D S Y/eel ff State: W / Zip: XI/9 a y/
Telephone #: (5 ZO) HZ t - L G o8 Fax: (¢ZO) Y24 - ZY 4 c/ Other Contact # or Email:
Ownership Status (Please Check): - Individual D Trust C Partnership -�rporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon
the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are
tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature. Date 4
ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
Address/Location of Rezoning Request: 2 0 - rW A U 0- J 14, E
Tax Parcel Number(s):
Rezone property from: IZ " 3 to lZ 3 ' P D
Purpose for Rezon e- na 00 M r,J I u ru S
b a PA C c-,
Describe existing property development and land use: V A G I — F-4 6
Describe proposed development and/or proposed land use: /y/ cr 4, i I — 64M I L Y W 1 774- .Cl
1 A-T M f j i3 A..9 D G o d Do J,& wit S
Proposed time schedule for development and/or use of the property: l2 DA DS A AJ a ti T/ e- r 77 IC.S Tb
131E PLAT //J ?I,FrS yX" A4 0•-o6 W I TN S /7Z "040 AJO- 0,0A , a /j,vI r
GD/ot7'/darG 719.� 7"0' Fotrc.0aj /A) SP/Lr-*jv
Staff I Date Ree'd —7 �
SA
Zoning Adjacent to the Site: North: S a H m a L
South: V G .4 ay — F A r-o4 .y 0
East: /.-J O us 7•IZ 1.4 t_ fZ lc S. DEn0 '77,¢ e,
West: I N O u s rme *e- / A0 St Dx^ -)T1A t-
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - Must accompany the application to be complete.
❑ Map of the immediate area showing property involved. Area to be rezoned must be outlined in color
❑ A site plan drawn to readable scale showing present status of property and proposed development
❑ Street address, adjacent streets, intersections and any other information or landmarks to help identify the property
❑ Location of existing uses, structures, fences and signs and location of proposed uses, structures, fences and signs
❑ A narrative statement explaining the zone change and discussion of the project
D . Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
SUMMARY OF PROCESS
The City of Oshkosh Plan Commission and Common Council act on all zone changes. The petitioner or owner
should be rep sent at both the Plan Commission and Common Council meetings to discuss and answer
questions regarding the request.
Neighborhood opinion is an important factor in the decision - making process. For complex or controversial
proposals, it is recommended that the petitioner conduct a neighborhood meeting to solicit public input prior to
action by the Plan Commission and City Council. Planning Services staff is available to offer assistance in
compiling a mailing list for the neighborhood meeting. Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all
abutting property owners regarding your request.
The application package is reviewed by Planning Services staff to determine conformance with adopted city
plans, zoning requirements and development standards. A staff recommendation is prepared for consideration
by the Plan Commission and Common Council. The petitioner will be provided with a copy of the staff report
and meeting notice several days prior to the Plan Commission meeting. No notice is sent to the petitioner or
owner regarding the Common Council's consideration of the request. Petitioners and owners are encouraged
to contact Planning Services staff to find out when the request will be sent to the Common Council for review.
The Plan Commission's decision is advisory only. The Common Council will make the final decision
regarding all zone change requests. The Plan Commission may lay over requests to subsequent meetings if
incomplete information is provided or additional questions or concerns are raised at the meeting.
After the Plan Commission makes its recommendation, the request will be forwarded to the Common Council
for consideration. This generally occurs three weeks after the Plan Commission meeting depending on the date
the Council meeting is scheduled (the Council meets on the 2 nd and 4 Tuesday of every month) and on the
availability of a legal description for the zone change. Wisconsin State Statutes require a zone change to be
published as Class II notice in the local newspaper, the City takes care of this publication requirement prior to
the Council meeting.
If Council approves the rezoning, the Ordinance is published in the newspaper on the following Saturday and
will be effective on Sunday. City administrative offices are notified of the effective date of the Ordinance and
will make changes to the official zoning map accordingly.
For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/ Community _Development /Planning.htm
6A
MD WEST COWANIES
1V.IEADQW PARKDET ELOP.1 NT
This is a vacant piece of property presently being cropped which is proposed for development by Midwest
Companies. The proposed use is multi family residential which is consistent with the present R -3 zoning.
The property to the north is a school and adjacent property is a mixed use of residential and industrial.
The property to the south has been rezoned for residential use.
The project will have a total of 7 — 8 unit apartment buildings for a total of 56 units and duplex
condominiums totaling 30 units on the east side of Meadow Park Drive. Below is a. breakdown of the
building, pavement and green areas:
East parcel:
Buildings
114,905 sq. f1. 2.64 acres 16%
Pavement
125,808 sq. fL 2.88 acres 18%
Green area
474,117 sq. & 10.88 acres - 66%
Residents in this development will enter and leave this project via Meadow Park Drive. Meadow Park
Drive intersects with 2e Avenue.
EV
City of Oshkosh Application
0 Conditional Use Permit SUBMIT T O:
Dept. of Community Development
OjiAcji� 215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130
ON THE WATER * *PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK ** Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54903 - 1130
PHONE: (920) 236 -5059
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: D�lA -S y00. iZ S o Date: !Xf fJ g
Petitioner's Address: 101S N. L J 04 t. OQ. City: 4 "Lim iy^) State: U/ Zip: Sy91 yf
Telephone #: (g 2 p) 13 1- y 1 4 4 Fax: (J '79 1 Other Contact # or Email:
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): - Owner Representative Tenant C Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required): Date:
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): OSW rtGOf I4 OFf%/GE Or.J b I- I., C- Date: Z1Vp
Owner(s) Address: Z f ft . MA Jf f&0,0 2. sr City: OS M 0 0 State: W t Zip: .5 7 YfO
Telephone #: (O/Zo) Yz G - Z 0,2% Fax: ( f Zo) yL G L'f 14 Other Contact # or Email:
Ownership Status (Please Check): 0 Individual C Trust, ❑ Partnership corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the
property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative
and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signatur r� Date:
SITE INFORMATION
Address/Location of Proposed Project: Z O TEL A 0 fm.. A--5 CL 1=
Proposed Project Type: A ) 0, 41 2 - r i,E. 73 4 1 N 841A 20 GO• D e
Current Use of Property: 11,4r,,4 .*J T - w4 y d Zoning:
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: S G Ef Dot,
South: Vk C4 w r - 4 eau e, *,0-Q
East: 1A.0 09(57 4-4- 12JVf,0X.y77* 4-
West: IAJ VwSr2tAri�, I tZr-Sr ozi4
"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request.
Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
D Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON - REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us / Community _Development /Planning.htm
Staff K Date Recd �.
s�
Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
1 Huth, safety. and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
�/f ALA S # osaL- d oe_ �!o
L r�v D S W ♦T T1f�.s Fr a 9-.�T /.se P.a2T owl .i�OJ�eLa��'
�sp�t.�r�2iAe DEJJY'.`o/ ��i�` A - ,.laA �ix-r.��.f' d4v6e..oPsvE, yr. T•f/F_
Z Pedestrian and vehicular circulatio ' ''s afe '' ty� "4 ! AA' W ' W O��' o �e5.
.4 w lNTEP � TtL�3FFrG rrri.c. f rT ra: .ss
Lvir.er I�+T{�fBer^ 4�J7}aI 2oT�i A ✓E. Tn�� P lJNtet1
3. Noise, air, water, or other forms 71111 f environmental pollution
THIS
lr IJ�J.,*040� Cv!4L eJ GJ TTGt� /�► /S 40 7
w�re..fays >'aora�e- 0AP0 .0 rZ7d e.e w.v r
4. The demand for and availability of public services and faciliti
1 XX A. 47799P Le T ic. J nes AefrZE
I�d.�! 4 �Qur r✓D� Timis t�EJJrEeo /a+r^c'.
5• Character and future development of the are a
TIfF t/i¢ � - G I! .J+O 7".O4 50� T7� If
17 E e9 v d Ali id �', Z m✓ p t --o.C. /Z� S /d e
A R� /LJG,4 Ira td 4 sf"
t i. r jl Fe.. / t.J DW J 3'
Sus T �UmEMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
A narrative of the proposed conditional use and project including:
❑ Proposed use of the property
❑ Existing use of the property
❑ Identiflcation of structures on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
CI Projected number of residents, employees, and/or daily customers
❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units, floor area, landscape area, and parkin
nearest one - hundredth of an acre p g area expressed in square feet and acrea�c
13 Effects on adjoining ° 4s� .o the
J g properties to include: noise, hours of operation, glare, odor, fi vibration, etc.
� "Founding land uses
❑ Compatibility -:;'posed use with ad'acP
❑ Tic Z ,aeration 1 and other properties m the area.
❑ A "_, other infar!! „° x-;40+ +^
adequate understanding of the intended use and i ts relation to nearby properties
A complete site plan including;
❑ Two (2) full size (24";, 36 ") scaled and dimensioned prints of site plan and building elevations
Q Two (2) 8 ' /z" x I I (minimum) to 11" x 17" (maximum) reduction of the
(3 One aid pl an
One compact disc or diskette with digital plan s and drawings of the ro'ect i. r: uilding elevati ; site p
table file (if plans have been prepared digitally) p ' Auto - W 2000 format with fonts and plot style
❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner, if different
❑ Full name and contact information of petitioner's en g i neers/surveyors /architects, or other design professionals used i
Preparation
11 The date of the original plan and latest date of revision to the plan n the plan
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale. Said scale is not to be smaller than one inch equals sixty feet (1 " =60'
approved by the Department of Community Development prior to submittal )unless otherwise
13 All property lines and existing and proposed right -of -way lines with bearings and
❑ All required building setback and offset lines dimensions clean Y labeled
❑ All existing and proposed buildings, structures, and paved areas, including building entrances, walks, drives ' d
fences, walls
❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and m on
aterials used for constructi decks, patios,
❑ Location and dimension of all on -site parking (and off-site park
of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30-36 1 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance
❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas on the subject property em ployed), including a summary
❑ Location, height, design, illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the prop a hot
C3 Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of erty including proposed screening devices where applicable visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes, but is not limited o; HVAC etncs plan
transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents, gas regulators, generators pp able (i.e.
equipment, electrical
PI
1ffDWEST COMPANIES
AHADOWPARKDEVELOPAIIENT
This is a vacant piece of property presently being. cropped which is proposed for development by
Midwest Companies. The proposed use is multi family residential which is consistent with the
present R-3 zoning. The property to the north is a school and adjacent property is a mixed use of
residential and industrial. The property to the south has been rezoned for residential use.
The project will have a total of 7 8 unit apartment buildings fora total of 56 units and duplex
condominiums totaling 30 units on the east side of Meadow Park Drive. On the west side of
Meadow Park Drive there are a total of 65 c units. Below is a breakdown of the
building, pavement and green areas:
East parcel:
Buildings
114,905 sq. fl.
2.64 acres
. 16%
Pavement
125,808 sq. ft.
2.88 acres
18%
Green area
474,117 sq. ft.
10.88 acres
66%
West parcel:
Buildings
122,703 sq. ft.
2.81 acres
17%
Pavement
121,331 sq. ft.
2.78 acres
17%
Green area
464,011 sq. ft.
10.65 acres
66%
Residents in this development will enter and leave this project via Meadow Park Drive. Meadow
Park Drive intersects with 2e Avenue.
10
[ert a
Jw . w r aua s m�vwt aeu w -01-0 �y
'®� "°'° .. • "� SAT `■W ORMOS OW JOM MMdR O .T S aYr
F•
�$ file F
� . ���.■.. ..�� ..n..u..u�....■..nu.uun.. � E
eoeame . x.■ ps. e�eeo . :smmrm.wo�F @eYrtg$�dd��
1
I IK ' �mml mw
Pik
m
to
Z?
JC-5
�Z
�o
F� � O v
to
O V °
�y
o
W �
W �.
y
Q o
y
�
i
m
m
s fit
g� 5R FRRA
!. I fill
ff. if
em 11mil g
- - - - --� all digWo
gg
Pill
-
awn-
OFF
11
R�
rcrr -ruxr/ rrrrrr�faxV' �e
tart -rrsrr wmxvat rn +r on°r
sacxatct W
9aaaaro
t�arcr ��
rO- iCLr09
a
sw
i p
,s
/�l[Il �
f 00 ✓AUMM {! iQQ /✓ o�
SisilrI�Q✓ 1!/�7 ^� ([iJ[
'G°r
few
R � �
••ewa• . x.. crs.••••..: z ■..n @�6errtEg6lS�r.�S� e ` "Q
1
y
4.1
�
a�
�gz
�o
�yoo
0
Q
� y
�O
w z �
Z
to
00
y
U,
a in- '.-
f f
A l t �e�flt t
�• E n
rigs
r
9
b
--- - - - - --
I
A
0
, /
J� it l
/
12
IV I J C'j U U IV d d X ODC L —ra L lydrD y^ruc —ycr Luca
N
b x015 4 j== &W MW MW ZLtIV 'NA 33M MA 'S $1 'IM HSONHSO - o
cunt cum 91st pa io oot ao '3AY 3�3 f70� ££Ct w MOMSW 'N W1 °z N
`°` SM o M W fl I N i WOa N IMl 3 NMOiS3M NOISMa 3VnVM'II N aiswa AMA xa3 .
,.�,.,
°o imoonaof�ew m�amu suaat Ta
II iI
I 11 JI
11 II _
® I II
I! II 11 _ fl
( N
L__ 11 it
® I f ®
® ®®
I it 11 > II II
—u__II � II !I
f w
'hel n W II o 11
❑ ❑ ❑ �r
I ❑ ❑❑ � I I I I I � ��e
❑ ❑❑ it II II w Ij INS
❑ ❑❑ it o II II — II � s
❑ ❑❑ II II �! ® II
❑❑❑ ii
II mil o` s ® IINe UJI
Z
LL-
J y�
❑❑❑ 11 tl o o =1N
❑❑❑ jj II _ Z
❑❑❑ II11 m= o
II I I
` ❑❑❑ II / II I
I)
_ — t1 I I
®® I I I g e m
13
6
' On
C
Z
0
W
0
�g
13
14
CUP /REZONING
OSHKOSH OFFICE BLDG LLC
MERIDIAN MK LLC
3127 W 20TH AV
2990 UNIVERSAL ST C
250 CITY CTR
PC: 08 -19 -08
OSHKOSH WI 54904
OSHKOSH WI 54901 4824
RE 3127 W 20TH AV
RE .2155 S OAKWOOD RD
SPRING VALLEY ESTATES LLC
CITY OF OSHKOSH
OAKBROOK EVAN FREE CHURCH
601 OREGON ST A
PO BOX 1130
3126 W 20TH AV
OSHKOSH WI 54902
OSHKOSH WI 549031130
OSHKOSH WI 54904
RE VACANT LOT -W 20TH AV
RE VACANT LOTS -W 20TH AV
OSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTCT
YMCA
JEFFREY /KAREN HAFEMEISTER
PO BOX 3048
324'WASHINGTON AV
3249 W 20TH AV
OSHKOSH WI 54903 3048
OSHKOSH WI 54901
OSHKOSH WI 54904
RE 3000 W 20TH AV
RE 3303 W 20TH AV
ROBERT /DORIS GRIESE
EDNA MUELLER
CAROW LAND SURVEYING
PO BOX 3221
2949 W 20TH AV
ATTN THOMAS HALVERSON .
OSHKOSH WI 54903
OSHKOSH WI 54904
615 N LYNNDALE DR
APPLETON WI 54914
RE 2979 W 20TH AV
M
DISCLAIMER
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor
a survey and it is not intended to be used as one.
This drawing Is a compilation of records, data
and information located in various city, county
and state offices and other sources affecting
the area shown and it Is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re-
sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the
City of Oshkosh.
Created by - dff
MULTI- FAMILY
RESI DEVELOPMENT
3127 W. 20TH AV.
Scale: 1" = 500'
}1
N O.lHKO1H
ON THE WATER
City of Oshkosh.
Department of
Community Development
08/07/08
soft
tf�Alkvq
I ��
oil al
11 Ail
IN
win
w
.. jj
IL 1 INE f
nn.
, 1 7 ,
V
tili
room
1!Ajg=
0" ttnn7 n771
Mill ERJAH:-
21
75 ;r l r. -
golf 911 111111111 1 6" 7 M Alit
T tj Ip r 1 - h 1 4
FA -