HomeMy WebLinkAboutE_E_Minutes_7-7-08MINUTES
Energy & Environment Advisory Board
Monday, July 7, 2008- 4:00 p.m.
City Hall, Room 406
The Monday, July 7, 2008, Energy & Environment Advisory Board was called to order
by Chair Dani Stolley.
Call to Order: Chair Stolley called the meeting to order and asked for roll call. Members
present included: Jan Scalpone, Steve Barney, Ronald Hardy, Robert Poeschl, Jessica
King and Margy Davey. Also present were Purchasing Agent Don LaFontaine, Media
Services Director Jon Urben and City Attorney Lynn Lorenson. There was no public
comment.
OLD BUSINESS
Approve June 2, 2008 meeting minutes: It was motioned by Scalpone, seconded by
Davey that the minutes be approved as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Intern Template: Chair Stolley noted they are still working to set a meeting with Dr.
Steve Dunn at UW-Oshkosh to discuss the internships.
Website Development: No report.
Subcommittee Reports: Ms. King noted the Natural Step Study Group had their last
meeting and she and Chair Stolley hope to have some recommendations for the board at
the August meeting. After some discussion it was motioned by Ms. King, seconded by
Mr. Hardy that the NS moderator, Catherine Neiswender, Community Development
Director UW-Extension is asked to present a full summary of the NS process and next
steps at the August meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Appoint Robert Breest: Chair Stolley noted she had appointed Mr. Breest to the
Municipal subcommittee.
Subcommittee Reports- Educational & Outreach: Mrs. Davey summarized the June 16,
2008 Education and Outreach subcommittee meeting and referred to the minutes
provided. It was noted all the subcommittee minutes would be available on the website.
Subcommittee Reports- Municipal: Mr. Hardy summarized the June 17, 2008 municipal
subcommittee meeting and referred to the minutes provided.
City Attorney- Role of the E & E Advisory Board: City Attorney then reviewed the role
of the E & E Board. She noted the board is an advisory board and is not as defined as
other statutory boards. The language defining the five charges of the board can be found
on 2-42 of the municipal code. Of the five charges, three are specifically set to review
and recommend. All are done at the request of the council/city manager for specific
projects or issues. Two of the five charges are more independent and suggest sending
recommendations to the council for their consideration. Ms. Lorenson noted the E & E
Advisory Board cannot take on additional charges or issues without a specific request
from the city manager/council with direction and guidance.
Some discussion then followed on how would the advisory board gain additional
direction/guidance from the city manager/council on specific issues. Ms. Lorenson noted
that such action would require two council members to support an ordinance change
followed by council support. On the question of would the E & E Advisory Board be
working in conjunction with other boards on similar issues or projects, Ms. Lorenson
reiterated the E & E would only need to be involved if they were specifically asked to
look into a project or issue by the city manager or council. As for the discussion on
municipal staff involvement with E & E Advisory Board projects, Ms. Lorenson stressed
that department heads are responsive to many duties, projects and priorities. She noted
the E & E can request information but has no authority to set priorities for departments or
staff. She stressed that city staff are very responsive and cooperative and that the E & E
must be patient for information.
Riverside Floating Dock Discussion: Ms. Lorenson reiterated that it was not within the
E & E role to review the Riverside Floating Docks project. She noted it was hoped the
DNR would continue to review this project and have an update for the group at the
August meeting. On the floating dock issue Ms. Lorenson noted under the City/WPS
purchasing agreement of that area WPS retains responsibility of environmental issues.
WPS is also the sole contact with agencies. As such, Ms. Lorenson notes the city does
not want to be in breech of contract by getting involved with any outside agencies and
states that this issue not be discussed at this time until the project moves through the
current process. She stressed again that any environmental remediation to this area is a
WPS/EPA coordinated issue, not a city issue. The floating docks are a separate issue.
She stressed that if a citizen has a concern on a city project, they should contact the city
manager/council on the issue and then if either the council or city manager determined
they would like the E & E Advisory Board to explore an issue they would make that
request. She noted the E & E Advisory Board must request permission to proceed on
exploring an issue to then review/advise the city manager/council on the issue.
New Business: It was noted Catherine would be asked to provide a summary of the NS
process at the August meeting. It was also noted that a draft agenda should be emailed
out to members at least one week prior for any changes or suggestions. Mr. LaFontaine
noted all minutes and agendas would be placed on the city website. Chair Stolley then
confirmed the next regular meeting date would be August 4, 2008. It was then motioned
by Ms. King, seconded by Chair Stolley that the board adjourns at 5 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
~'avi. C~. ur~iev~
Secretary, Oshkosh Energy & Environmental Advisory Board
cc Don LaFontaine, Purchasing Agent
John Fitzpatrick, Acting City Manager