Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter-Variance approved o ~ City of Oshkosh Dept. . of Community Development Planning Services Division 215 Church Ave., PO Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 (920) 236-5059 (920) 236-5053 FAX http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us Jackson R. Kinney Director Dept. of Community Development OJHKOJH Darryn Burich Director Planning Services Division August 9,2007 Mr. Mark Showers 3011 Mockingbird Way Oshkosh, WI 54904 Re: 601 W 6th Ave Dear Mr. Showers: On August 8, 2007 the Board of Appeals approved a variance to allow the development of a new single-story office building with off-street parking and attached storage/garage facility with setbacks as requested in your application submitted July 16, 2007 with the following condition: a. . The property owner shall cooperate with the Department of Public Works in providing additional area for the construction of sidewalk and handicapped ramps at the comer of 6th Ave. and Ohio St. The decision of the Board was filed in the Planning Services Division Office of the Department of Community Development on August 9,2007. Per Section 30-6(C)(3) and (4) of the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance, your variance will expire on February 9, 2008 unless you have started construction for the activity allowed by the variance. If you fail to begin construction by this date, you must reapply for a variance if you intend to go ahead with the activity allowed by the variance. Please be advised that any person or persons aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Appeals may commence action in Circuit Court within thirty (30) days after the filing of the decision. Permits may be issued on approval of the Board, but you should be aware that further action could take place until as much as 30 days after the date of the decision. Building permits may be applied for from the Inspection Services Division in Room 205 at the Oshkosh City Hall between 7:30 - 8:30 AM and 12:30 - 1 :30 PM, Monday through Friday, or call (920) 236-5050 for an appointment. Please bring all required building plans and information necessary for review when obtaining your building permit. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (920) 236-5057. Respectfully, . Todd ~ Associate Planner/Zoning Administrator TM/kj g CC. Inspections Services Division, City Hall . OJHKOJH City of Oshkosh Planning Services Division 215 Church Ave., PO Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 (920) 236-5059 (920) 236-5053 FAX http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us Jackson R. Kinney Director Dept. of Community Development Darryn Burich Director Planning Services Division BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA AUGUST 8, 2007 3:30 PM To Whom It May Concern: Please note the City of Oshkosh Board of Appeals will meet on WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2007 at 3:30 PM in Room 404 at the Oshkosh City Hall to consider the following agenda. ROLL CALL AND DECLARATION OF A QUORUM APPROVAL OF JULY 11, 2007 MINUTES HEARING OF NEW APPEALS AND APPLICATIONS 1. 143 Church Avenue Scott & Nicole Brayton-applicant/owner, requests a variance to permit the creation of a 1.5 story detached garage. Section 30-22 (B)(6)(b)(i) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code: R-5 Multiple Dwelling District requires one story maximum. II. 601 W. 6th Avenue Mark Showers-applicant/owner, requests the following variances to permit the creation of a new single-story office building with off-street parking: Required (Section 30-35 (B)(J)(c)) I) 25' transitional yard setback (north) II) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west) III) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west) Proposed 9' transitional yard setback (parking) 2' 1 0" transitional yard setback (parking) 17' 4" transitional yard setback(building) III. 2005 Parkside Drive Erwin Warnke-applicant/owner, requests a variance to reduce the number of required off-street parking spaces. Section 30-36 (B)(8) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code: Off-Street Parking requires two family dwellings to provide two parking spaces for each unit up to three bedrooms plus an additional one-half parking space per bedroom for a Unit with more than three bedrooms. IV. 3450 Vinland Street Wisconsin Independent Christian Schools-applicant, Oshkosh Christian School-owner, requests a variance to permit the creation of a sign with a front yard setback of 15'. Section 30-17 (B)(2)(c) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code: R-l Single Family Residence District requires a front yard setback of25'. V. 802 Eastman Street Lowell L. & Jay L. Bruggink-applicant/owner, request a variance to permit the creation of an off-street parking area within required setbacks. Section 30-36(C)(5) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code: Off-Street Parking requires uncovered parking spaces to comply with the front, rear, and side yard setbacks of the principal structure and be screened in accordance with Section 30-35 (1). DISCUSSION OF BOA PROCEDURES Mr. Br n showed a picture of a garage with windows that is on Franklin St. and was approved 3-4 years ago. He in : ated he is not asking for anything nearly as large as that one. He went on to say that he is really asking .,a two-story garage, not a carriage house. He does intend to have the garage blend . the house and would adding wood to the fayade. The trim will be wood and painted the same co as the house trim. d had the authority to override a State code. Ms. Hentz said yes if it met the Mr. Carpenter said the limited space fo arking (four cars), the 2-car g space in the basement seemed like a har . to him. He also said h garage will eliminate the need to store items tside. e combined with the limited g the additional storage space in the Mr. Penney said he drove by the property and Mr. rayton made to the property. He said he did not see how th appearance of the property. He.,:;felt it would add to uld be commended for the improvements size of the garage would detract from the e of the property. Ms. Hentz said she is leaning in the direction of proval du 0 the uniqueness of the property and the hardship discussed as they relate to the varian review questi6\s. She indicated she would want the owner to reduce the height of the garage by 6" as said he would be ~.'ng to do. Further, she would like to see this as an amendment to the approval. T would make the height O',Jhe building 18' 8" instead of 19' 2". Mr. Cornell asked if the building e Mr. Muehrer indicated the buil"mg would be 1-112 stories and said the amen exceed 1-112 stories and 18' in height. ntz to approve the application with the following condition a. Th uilding "is not to exceed 1-112 stories and 18'8" in height. Seconded Wilusz. rried 3-2. Ayes-CarpenterIPenneyIHentz. Nays- CornelllWilusz Finding acts: There e unique limitations to the property. Th uilding will be aesthetically appealing. ere is no harmful effect to the neighborhood II. 601 W 6TH AVE ed a two-story building. Mark Showers-applicant/owner, requests the following variances to permit the creation of a new single-story office building with off-street parking: Required (Section 30-35 (B)(I)(c)) 25' transitional yard setback (north-bldg) 25' transitional yard setback (north-park) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west-park) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west-bldg) 19'3" transitional yard setback (south) Approved (06/13/07) 14' transitional yard setback 14' transitional yard setback 4' 10" transitional yard setback Not requested 1 0' transitional yard setback Board of Appeals Minutes 4 Requested No change 9' transitional yard 2' 10" transitional yard 17' 4" transitional yard No change August 8, 2007 property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome." He did not feel there was anything that qualified as a hardship and could not support the request. Ms. Hentz indicated she wanted as much input from the board members as possible and was inclined to agree with Mr. Wilusz but thought the property was unique in that the lot is small. Mr. Cornell concurred with Mr. Wilusz and said the different between an 18 ft garage and a 19' 2' (14") was not worth the time to discuss it. Mr. Carpenter asked if there could not be a floor if the garage was 18 ft. high. Mr. Muehrer said that was correct, no upper floor is allowed. The guideline is 18' and one story. Mr. Carpenter referred to the applicant's reference to his low basement and the lack of workspace and storage in the house. He asked what the dimensions of the garage would be. Mr. Muehrer said 24 ft. X 17 ft. Mr. Carpenter asked if the garage could be any bigger. Mr. Muehrer said no, it would infringe on setback guidelines if it were larger. Mr. Carpenter said 24 ft. x 17 ft. gives just barely enough room for 2 cars. He thought the small size of the lot and the fact that there is no useable basement in the house constituted a hardship. He asked if the other carriage house had a floor in it. Mr. Muehrer presumed it did. Mr. Carpenter asked if the other garages in the area were two-car garages. Mr. Muehrer said yes. Mr. Penney asked why two stories were not allowed. Mr. Muehrer thought it was to prevent the owner from turning it into an apartment. Mr. Wilusz asked if he had a two-story garage without a floor could he create access to the second area. Mr. Muehrer said he would need to consult with the inspection department to answer that question. Ms. Hentz mentioned if there were rafters in the garage he would potentially be able to store things without even having to construct an access. He could just use a ladder. She asked Mr. Brayton what types of things he wanted to store. Mr. Brayton said, bicycles, seasonal items such as lawnmowers furniture, carpets, etc. He indicated that with the bed and breakfast oftentimes they would be switching out furniture in the rooms. He went on to say that the basement is damp and miserable to be in. Board of Appeals Minutes 3 August 8, 2007 Required (Section 30-36 C(3)(e)) 18' parking space depth Approved (06/13/07) 16' parking space depth No change Ms. Hentz asked that because the last variance request was approved, this current request would be considered the first request not the third as indicated on the staff report. . Mr. Muehrer confirmed that he had consulted with other .staff and determined that was correct. Mr. Muehrer presented the item. Mr. Mark Showers, 3011 Mockingbird Way, Oshkosh, petitioner and owner, and Mr.Charles Showers, 619 W. 19th Ave, Oshkosh were present and passed out new drawings for the building. Mr. Charles Showers indicated that the Public Works Department had concerns regarding parking lot drainage. The new code requires the driveway to be 120 feet from the corner and it is only 68 feet away. That is why the entrance to the parking area has been reduced from 24 feet to 12 fe~t. The size. of the handicapped parking stall was standard width of 9 feet and needed to be 14 feet wide so the grassy area on 6th Avenue to the west was reduced in depth from 14 feet to 9 feet. Also the building can be right up to the sidewalk but that includes the overhands so the building needed to be moved 2' in from the sidewalk. Mr. Mark Showers indicated he had already signed paperwork with the Public Works Dept. allowing the city access for the handicapped sidewalk. Mr. Charles Showers said the building is improved because of being 2 feet in from the sidewalk and they are now able to have a basement under the building. Mr. Carpenter said that he was bothered by the fact that the building was going to be right up against the sidewalk. He is pleased that it is moved in by 2 feet. Mr. Cornell commented tl;1at there had been much discussioJ;1 about the project at the previous presentations and would move to accept the item. Motion by Cornell to approve the request with the condition that property owner shall cooperate with the Department of Public Works in providing additional area for the construction of sidewalk and handicap ramps at the corner ofW 6th Avenue and Ohio St. Seconded by Carpenter. Motion approved 5-0. Ayes-Wilusz/Carpenter/Cornell/ Penney/ Hentz. Nays- None. Finding of Facts: There is no harm to the neighborhood The property has limitations due to size and corner location. Project will be aesthetically appealing and will enhance the area. There will be improved safety with the handicapped sidewalk access. ~~\B4il\Ji~ DR _ .",,,,*~~ Erwin Warnke-applicant/owner, req . ance to reduc~:ym@'~}Ii,,~f'.-re<i.fH'ireei"G'f~~"pi:1flnng spaces. Section 30-36 (B)(8) of the Oshkos ~~e: 'Off-Street Parking requires two family dwe~lings to pr~vid~~p",~~iE@')s. ~ or each unit up to tIrroo.,~oms plus an additional one-half p~i{l;~a~~~rlYearoom for a umt WIth more than three bedrooms. ""~'~ Board of Appeals Minutes 5 August 8, 2007 ~ ~ STAFF REPORT BOARD OF APPEALS AUGUST 8, 2007 ITEM II: 601 W. 6m AVENUE GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND It should be noted this is the third hearing for this application. The most recent hearing occurred on June 13, 2007 and was approved 5-0. Mark Showers-applicant has altered his proposal and is requesting the third hearing. Mark Showers-applicant/owner, requests the following variances to permit the creation of a new single-story office building with off-street parking: Required (Section 30-35 (B)(I)(c)) 25' transitional yard setback (north-bldg) 25' transitional yard setback (north-park) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west-park) 19'3" tranSitional yard setback (west-bldg) 19'3" transitional yard setback (south) Approved (06/13/07) 14' transitional yard setback 14' transitional yard setback 4' 10" transitional yard setback Not requested 10' transitional yard setback Requested No change 9' transitional yard 2' 10" transitional yard 17' 4" transitional yard No change Required (Section 30-36 C(3)(e)) 18' parking space depth Approved (06/13/07) 16' parking space depth No change The subject 0.14 acre (approx. 6,155 sq. ft.) property is zoned C-3 Central Commercial District and is located on the southwest corner at the intersection of W. 6th Avenue and Ohio Street. The lot is rectangular in shape (approximately 68'x 90') and the general area can be characterized as mixed commercial-residential. ANALYSIS . In reviewing a variance request, the following questions should be addressed: When considering an area variance, the question of whether unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty exists is best explained as "whether compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing area, setbacks, frontage, height, bulk or density would unreasonably prevent the owner. from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome." Are there any unusual or unique physical limitations of the property, which create a hardship? Will granting of a variance result in harm to the public interest? The applicant is requesting variances from the Zoning Ordinance to allow the development of a new single-story office building with off-street parking as well as an attached storage/garage facility. The applicant's proposed plans are to raze the existing buildings located at 601 W. 6th Avenue because of their dilapidated condition. According to City Records, the existing two-story, 2,000 sq. ft. principal structure was built in 1894 and the existing utility shed (176 sq. ft.) and detached garage (484 sq. ft.) were constructed in 1950. According to the applicant, the variance requests will not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties because the existing build and garages are in very poor condition. The existing garages and principal structure are located up to the property's lot lines. Conversely, the proposed garage and principal structure will be setback farther away from the lot line. The applicant is also proposing a new maintenance free fence (details such as materials and design have not been submitted) along the entire west and south lot 1 STAFF REPORT ITEM II -2- BOARD OF APPEALS AUGUST 8, 2007 lines to enhance surrounding properties and mitigate the visual impact of the commercial structure on abutting residential properties. In the applicant's opinion, the special conditions related to the subject lot that do not apply to surrounding lots are the conflicting R-2 and C-3 districts. The applicant believes hardships will be imposed if the variances are not granted because the existing building will need to be razed eventually due to the major structural problems. The proposed new single-story building would be setback 14' from the north lot line, 10' from the south lot line, 2' from the east lot line, and feature approximatelyl,584 sq. ft. of office space with an additional 780 sq. ft. of attached garage/storage area. Vehicular access to the property would occur off of W. 6th Avenue. A four stall off street parking area is proposed to the west of the office building, which would be setback 9' from the north lot line and 2.8' from the west property line. A large asphalt driveway/platform area would be used to access the garage and storage facility. The applicant is also proposing a new fence along the south and west property lines to mitigate the visual impact of the commercial use on the abutting residential properties. A 17'3"open space/side yard area is proposed in the southwest portion of the property as well. The most recent adjustments/changes to the variance requests are needed for two reasons. First, the applicant must move the proposed building 2' off the east lot line to provide room for eaves, soffit, and gutters. By moving the building 2' to the west, the proposed garage/storage facility and off-street parking area are now two feet closer to the property line and require further variance. The second reason for the modified plan is the applicant must provide one (14'x 18') handicap accessible parking space for the development. The additional 5' needed for this parking space would reduce the transitional yard setback from the north lot line to 9'. Staff does not object to the most recent requests. Ample side yard (west) still exists on the property and the proposed 6' high fence along the west lot line will reduce the visual impact of the commercial development. Likewise, the sightline along W. 6th Avenue will not be interrupted as substandard setbacks are alfeady welfestabIlshed. RECOMMENDATION Based on the information provided within this report, staff recommends approval of the variances requested with the following condition: a) The property owner shall cooperate with the Department of Public Works in providing additional area for the construction of sidewalk and handicap ramps at the comer ofW. 6th Avenue and Ohio Street. 2 a. Gutters are to be insta Ave. . Hentz to approve the request for the creation of a detached garage wit e ollowing conditions: Seconded by Cornell. Findings . i C cts: Re a/the old garage will eliminate any safety issues. erse effect to the neighborhood ~,,--~~~fi221:.sew?uld make' . .~W<~ ~J{J1JiJo;J/APt III. 601 W 6th Ave It should be noted this is the second hearing for this application. The original hearing occurred on May 9, 2007 and was denied 0-5. Charles Showers-applicant has altered his proposal and is requesting the second hearing. Charles Showers-applicant, Kelly J. Burnett-owner, request tne following variances to permit the creation of a new single-story office building with off-street parking: Required (Section 30-35 (B)(l)(c)) I) 25' transitional yard setback (north) II) 19'3" transitional yard setback (west) III) 19'3" transitional yard setback (south) Proposed 14' transitional yard setback 4' 1 0" transitional yard setback 10' transitional yard setback Required (Section 30-36 C(3)(e)) IV) . 18' parking space depth Proposed 16' parking space depth The subject 0.14 acre (approx. 6,155 sq. ft.) property is zoned C-3 Central Commercial District and is located on the southwest corner at the intersection of W. 6th Avenue and Ohio Street. The lot is rectangular in shape (approximately 68'x 90') and the general area can be characterized as mixed commercial- residential. Mr. Muehrer presented the item. Mr. Charles Showers, 619 W. 19th Ave., applicant said the previous drawing for the building was torn up. He had met with Todd Muehrer and David Buck, Planners with the City of Oshkosh and together they had created something even better than what had been previously proposed. All the asphalt that was not going to be used for driveway/parking was eliminated and turned into grass. He feels they addressed all the concerns that the board had. Mr. Carpenter asked if Mr. Showers was now the owner. Mr. Showers said his son Mark, is actually the owner. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes June 13, 2007 3 Mr. Muehrer asked if Kelly Burnett was still the owner. Mr. Showers said, no, they closed on the property the previous Friday because they were concerned that Mr. Burnett would decide to increase the price. Mr. Penney asked what is the existing property's use. Mr. Showers said it is an old building. Someone used to live upstairs but there was no business downstairs due to the lack of plumbing on the first floor. A renovator did take a look at the building but he said it could not be saved. A meeting with an architect is scheduled for next week to create the actual plans. Mr. Nielsen reviewed the old design versus the new design. He commented that moving the garage to the backside improved the view by adding more green space. The office space is now 66' x 24', making it longer than the previously submitted plan of26' x 52' and the garage was 26'x32' but is now 26'x 30'. It fits into the area well. The Ohio Street area needs revitalization and this would be a good kick-start. It is laid out very well. Mr. Cornell commented that the area is definitely improved with the added green space on all four corners. It is always better to be able to get away from asphalt. Mr. Carpenter agreed that the result is greatly improved. He was pleased that Mr. Showers worked with City staff to create something that could be recommended to them. He asked staff if there was a reason why one side has 4'8" setback and Ohio Street has none. Mr. Muehrer said there is no setback requirement on Ohio St. Mr. Carpenter said he is always concerned about blind corners. Mr. Muehrer explained that the corner is a controlled intersection so there is not a problem with vision for drivers. If it were not a controlled intersection there would be an issue. Mr. Carpenter commented that he could see that it is better to have grass on other sides than on Ohio St. Mr. Muehrer said reducing the number of variance requests was a major concern. Since there is no setback requirement on the Ohio Street side it was decided to move the building closest to Ohio St. so that more green space could be on the west side of the building. Mr. Nielsen asked if Mr. Showerswas only planning on one door. Mr. Showers said there will only be one door for business traffic but there will be a second door coming out of the office in the back. Mr. Penney asked if there would be an entry on Ohio St. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes June 13,2007 4 Mr. Showers said no. He commented further that there will be construction to widen Ohio St and the sidewalk size will be reduced. Sixth St will also be under construction up to 30 feet from the corner. We know we will be in a bad spot because of the construction but we want that corner. Ms. Hentz said she will support the request and thanked the applicant for his persistence to get the project approved and for working closely with city staff. Ms. Hentz thanked staff as well for putting in the time with the applicant necessary to have a positive result. Often, people are turned down by the board and leave disgruntled and don't pursue solving the issues as Mr. Showers did. Mr. Showers said he was very impressed with Todd Muehrer and David Buck for their hard work and commented on how they had worked through their lunch hour. He extended a personal thanks to . them. Mr. Penney moved to approve the request as presented. Seconded by Mr. Carpenter. ) Motion approved 5-0. Ayes-Cornell/Nielson/Penney/Carpenter/Hentz. Nays-None. Findings of Fact: Removing dangerous building. There will be increased tax base. With no plumbing the building is useless. No adverse effect to the area. The least number o/variances were used to accomplish the goal. ~, '7~TI'~~..)~_~~~ . 'l';[ 1 4_~.~~...~- bers continued to discuss Board of Appeals procedures. As a follow up t e meeting, Ms. Hentz asked that when there is a second or third review of an item that submissions and resu e included in the staff report so that the history of the request can be revie new submission. Ms. Hentz then suggested the board mem review the "Proce section by section to determine if any changes w ro ria and Regulations for the Board 'of Appeals" d suggested that the name officially be Board of Ms. Hentz said she also had se elevator. She has experie that changing the na oth ways and it is listed as BZA meetin the agenda posted downstairs by the eople getting the Board of Appeals confused wi Board of Review. She agreed oard of Zoning Appeals would be less confusing to the gene ublic. ed if the change needed to be made in the form of a motion or could just be by June 13,2007 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · '-'. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . . . . . ... .. . . . . Ii . . .1 iii . . .. . ..' 5' " oM 10 ;.. SI, 5 ... '\\ <:S 0'- iI ew & I !;;nce Ma..lnfeno.YJce hee ~. -21.)' 2b! N elV O,rrJ~ e. f)u.;)din) . G a.. 'r d.}1 e. -If 30' 5r-cra;t~ . t~' /:;8. Lf I ~ -lil J!I/; SUBMITfED BY APPLICANT [< >-w 6 Please Type or Print in BLACK INK ~ O.JHKOJ"H Return to: Department of Community Development 215 Church Ave. P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 CITY OF OSHKOSH APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Please submit a complete reprod ucible site plan (maxim urn size 11" x 17"). (A complete site plan includes, but is not limited to, all structures, lot lines and streets with distances to each.) Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE. The fee is payable to the City of Oshkosh and due at the time the application is submitted. Address of Parcel Affected: ~O/ W 6t:!J Fft..-t., O~) WI: ~OOl Petitioner: /J1/tJ<?k' "'ShDVe e~ Home Phone: ;;?3;;L - 033? Petitioner's Addres" ~tx.f'~f (!.~~W'~ork Phone: ,;;>3,;2 - 07.33 Sign.toreRequired: ~~ Date: 07!;/P/o7 Owner (if not petitioner)~~ . Home Phone: . Owner's Address: Work Phone: Signature Required: Date: In order to be granted a variance, each applicant must be able to prove that an unnecessary hardship would be created if. the variance is not granted. The burden of proving an unnecessary hardship rests upon the applicant. The attached sheet provides information on what constitutes a hardship. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary, to provide the information . requested. Additional information may be requested as needed.) 1. Explain your proposed plans and why you are requesting a variance: 1. Per the city planners we are requesting 3 new variances after our existi~g variances had been approved to fmiher enhance the prope1iy. The 3 mam changes are: 1st: North lot line 14' to 9' for handicap parking. 2nd: ~es~ lot line 4.8' to 2.8' for parking lot. 3rd: West lot line 19.3' to 17.3' for bmldmg. 7 4\\~ 2. Describe how the variance would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties: 2. The variances will not have any adverse effect to the surrounding properties because the. The proposed new <;>ffice building will enhance and improve the surrounding properties. A new maintenance free fence will also be installed along the south & west lot lines to further enhance the surrounding properties. 3. Describe the special conditions that apply to your lot or structure that do not apply to surrounding lots or structures: 3. The surrounding lots are of mixed zoning, fl.'om C-3 Central Commercial District to R-2 Two Family Residential District. The properties existing structures andlot and including the surrounding structures and lots do not meet any of today' s new standards and existing codes. Any of the existing structures and lots in the surrounding areas which need to be razed or renovated will need variances. Our proposed plan, have kept the variances to the very minimum and have improved the existing conditions. 4. Describe the hardship that would result if your variance were not granted: 4. The city planners have reviewed our approved vari$1ces and are making these new recOlTIlnendations to further enhance the property. The hardship is since the approval of the new variances we have razed the building. 8 VARIANCES FOR OFFICE BULIDING 601 W. 6TH AVE., OSHKOSH NORTH 14' TO 9' HANDICAP PARKING WEST 4.8' TO 2.8' PARIZING WEST 19.3' TO 17.3' BUILDING 9 d I 3~ , I Q.) 01 V) II I :1 ~ ., n \\\1 I () I <1 ohio 1 st I [. <__h_'_"_" ). 'lJ "3 'U v\ ~j >-T Q ..1;- \f') 5 .1:::, t II + ~~J '\ , ". '''-'' " ",., -...... ", , " \, ;....,," \..\ I if l:! "', '....,' ~'. J',. ,J ---"\::-~C~ ~." '",j 30' ,~~G~~~\,. 't". " " '. '\ '\ ',,' . , '\" -...., \.j! :::0 ' " '. "-, ", " 'I g ~ "\, "\, '"" Door~ 1&' D::~:. t ~">"" ",..""~,~ ~I ...--/" /' ~......// ) .../..../.1 """":1' .' -" \ /'. .'. . / ../' ./., .. ., ". i' t /" ../' /./ /.... oJ'" ."'~: 2: 8 I.' .' ////0" /"/// ...../.... .,/ .........-;///./ / t! ) /' . }jj ~. '._~../' //./......,.. ......././' /' ,///,/ /// 1//' '\(~: ~ s.. ~-' ..//"- ....../ ,/ /~/.... i 01/0 /' /A/ /-"./ ../.-' I a <;:-\- .. / ./ /' ..... r---'" 1/ :~/// X\~~\ ";;::=::~>f~:\J <,' ....."" '\ '\ . . ,/ J ,- "- I/////\\S 0 // I ,~f() / //' .,o" n .. ..;/ ..-// ...//. ,'\,\ ! //..>>/// //. ~'(); '7' /-;.~ .1/'~"'i~ // /' V / . . ii ,/ // Y \ ~)/../" . (1 /// ~ i /' ,/ /\\..c~/ // ..// ..... e;l // ~/ ./ .' l ..../'\, I /,,/ ~. //// /7 ~':~r~- "/';; \'" ,,' ,/ / /..://,..,,/..../ ../ /..,....../ //<~./.,.."'../ 7 ~//// , Y. ../:~.......... ............/ C", ./ .. // '\ '.,..' . ,', . ...."d...... _.... ...... ," ,.". '" --- ..."" \' 1" ~. /,,/" . '" !~ " "'.....,.".."". "".,,.,.;-/2.:-e; ~\ "'2~';~s '~' ',' "'. , "-......//./ _, \ '\, 1 \',,-, C , /51 );1 5;d~:",uJcdl< (OC., I ~ rh Jl; L___~.~_"".....__...."_,_,.......-,_-..__,__"_____>,. W IV,. , ,....... 2 it I ____.__ ; ~ I _".._ ~~.. f.o " \ " ~I eW c'f.(; ~ e. bu.;!J j'~3 J58~ :;3'ff. GQ.Y-~ e I -0 5-T-oVQ ge.. 7 8 0 33- f-r, c: :SeT 'fSe.ck foY So{t;'t '6 b LLtJe. i" ~~':l:: t \;} l -;3 . \/) 1.:1 ~. () (' f\Oo.! Dr6.~n I \ ,"'!: '\ '\ '" \'-.,:, , 1 " '\ ."\ ) \\. \ - \"" "" -.. G'iJyc-(C)' \)2J \..\ \ \\~ -- "'~\ "\ \ \ "'" ", \ , . '\ ". 6:d w",n< New " gf' wa:..f.e, 'r J1 aitl 45' 75.45' 50.2' 50.0' DISCLAIMER This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and it is not Intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, data and information located in various city, county and state offices and other sources affecting the area shown and it Is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not reo sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepencies are found, please contact the City of Oshkosh. Created by - kjg 601 W. 6th Ave Scale: 1" - 60' 11 o r7:" l!:i ".; N 126.92' 37.5' 50. 50. 50.0' . . ~ OJHKOfH ON THE WA.TER City of Oshkosh Department of Community Development 04/20107 e .....'" , ~CO<O 'I"!:" "l;t N'" ... <0.,0 ... <0 <0 ...<OCO .,'" '" CO"'''' N"'... 1:'1 N"'~ 000 000 0. ""') 0. 0.0.0. ......... ... ;b;jl;;1; "''''''' '" ~~~ ~ ~~~ J:J:J: J: :rJ::r N(/)(/)(/) (/) (/)(/)en CIlOOO 0 000 Ul<:::<:::<: l<: ::<:::<:l<: ::!J::r:r J: J:J:J: <1;(/)0000 en en 0000 :2000 0 000 c:: 0 ::<: I- 0 lii~fi W (/) :;c Z~lU Z<CaJ O<C> <CJ:>- :r Cl:r<C O:2I-Z I- l(;!t::i3 O:JcoZ '" :'5~$11l $ ~$:C ~C!;~:e 0. ...."'., 0 ....00 :20. co'" '" ...."'.... "lit It):lt) ... "''''CO 0...... ... "'0')0') en co CO' '" 0."'''' Q.l()1l)1S) '" U;>U;>L? N~~~ N "''''''' 0 000 U<>>mcn 0. o.c>o. 0......... ;jI; ......... ...JU')U)tt) "''''''' I-~~ ~ WlU I-:;C:;C en:rJ: :r (/):r:r 001-1- I- Qt::t:: O:C <0 <0 '" 5$$ ;)0$$ $ o~gg '" co",,,, 0 ~oo ..,JLOtCW '" co",,,, j. fJ ..a -' ...,0 zO:: :r<C o:r ...,2 0::0:: WZ"" ClZW 0::0:: <1; W wW:2~ z[I)lL.1- $:2:J_ 0~;2g: 0:: >-",,.....r-- ,.... Xooo 0 <CoooIo r-NNN N 000 0 00000 aOOeDD OOOeDO 0~\:;j~3l~ Z81:'1t:i~o ~~~~~~ o."'''''''T''' :2 ~ W c:: o ..J en 0. :J ..J :c 0. 0. en c. :J ..J :c c. U ..J ..J >~ :r~iTI >-:2:2 0::01- o:::cen <cI-W Clu.> o::u.~ w::5o:: l<:~C:: o <C W c. ooen ............... 000 000 "''''''' 000 000 000 0.00 "''''a to '" 0. 0........ 000 to CD to 000 "''''''' 11 ----I- 75.45' 50.2' i'- ...... ~ us map IS nelt ler u eg eeor e mop nor n survey and it is nol inlended 10 be used as one. This drllwing is a compilation of records, data and information located in various city, county and state offices and other sourres affecting the area shown and it is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re~ sponsible ror any inaccuracies herein contained. I r discrepencies are round, please contact the City .r Oshkosh. Created by - kjg :"I~.""":~f',~1in 0) 126.92' 37.5' 50.0' ~ Cl.) ~ ~ en o ..c o 50.0' 50.0' . 50.0' co o I'- b o 601 W 6th Ave Scale: 1"= '60 12 50.03' ~ I"- m 0) 49.99' w. b o 0) b~ 0- 0) N A OS/29/2007 Source: City of Oshkosh GIS l1ils map IS nel er l\ egn )' recor e mnp nor n survey and i1 is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilntion ofrecords, data and information located in various city, count)' and slate offices and other sources affecting Ihe area shown and it is 10 be used for reference purposes only, The City of Oshkosh is not re- sponsible for uny inaccuracies herein contained, Ifdiscrepencies are found, please contact the City or Oshkosh. Created by- kjg ~I ~ ~ ~7~ <16.0" .... -W:-TfH-AVE. w. 601W 6th Ave N A OS/29/2007 Scale: 1 "= '150 13 Source: City of Oshkosh GIS This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and It Is not intended to be used as one. This drawing Is a compilation of records, data and information located in various city, county and state offices and other sources affecting the area shown and It is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Oshkosh is not re- sponsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained. If dlscrepencies are found, please contact the City of Oshkosh. Created by - kjg 601 W 6th Ave ~ OJHKOJH DISCLAIMER ON THE WATER Scale: 1 ,. - 60' City of Oshkosh Department of Community Development 04/20/07 14 1A