HomeMy WebLinkAbout0009544-Building (addition)
~
CITY OF OSHKOSH N2
PERMIT - APPLICATION AND RECORD
I .- . ....... -. .-.- .'-"-'".
09544
~PE: . . ~L~~ ~G. E? ~:E~. E? . ~:BG. 0 . ~'~~ .[] . ZON~N~.~. F~~OD. P'-':'~ -4!~I~HT~
!-/- ~ <!- ko 1 s,v-~ e f-
'?' . 't'> \" a..... "tA-. e.c . c' 4- Ct... (r:
OWNER
I~~
PLAN NO.
ADDRESS
DESIGNER
BUILDING CONTRACTOR
Siz~ 'f._~ Sq. Ft.
Z3 '(:2.' /'o~/~
Foundation
..sv It\. r t.>O v'^-.:.. !?e",,-o &-e I kl...-I- ~!tf n
-ZSf)h ~) ~ /.f>-~
# Rooms..... ~ # Stories
Class of Const. B
( Height.
Occupancy Permit ~ ~ qtl
HEATING CONTRACTOR
Heat 0 AlC 0 Vent 0 Fuel/System
'C
Heat Loss
BTU'S
ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR ~ fa. r-
Electric Servo New 0 Change 0 Temp 0
Type_ Volts_ Amps_
Fixtures
Switches
Receptacles
Circuits
PLUMBING CONTRACTOR ~""'- M o v\.... ..:s
_Ur
_ CBasin
_ San. Sewer
_ Storm Sewer
_BT _WH _Disp
_Lav _Sh _OW
_WC _FOr _SP
_Sink _ L Tub _ Eject
Other
_ WSoft
_OF
_SS
_ Water
ISSUED BY
Date
Park Dedication $ r
Final/O.P. !/I S;/Y j
FEES: Valuatio
In the performance of this work I agree
erform all work pursuant to rules governing the described construction.
SIGNATURE ~/4V.~;/"
AGENTIO
ADDRESS /"1fJ~6'8"? ~~
DATE
~~
SF.? r:7tJ2.
TELEPHONE #
ZCNING/mID USE CO!-1PLIANcr CHECI<r.J:ST
t. GENERAL
Buildi.n<] Pe1::mi.t # ZO .
~ . rung
Job t.ocation 1708 fi,<c~ ...(
Property OWner vir' hie
Confo:mi.ng_ Non-ConfO.tmlng_ '
tot Di1tension
IDt Area
a::NS'1'Ru:TICN DATA
Describei'brk: ('~~ p~ .t-o-rhA'L-
\ ~ J~ - b-frff~ ~
~ NEW CCNSTRUCTION ---LL ADDITICN
II.
_ Accessory Bui.lding
Fence
Eoathouse
_ utility Structure
_ Other (specify)
III. <DMPI.1:MCE am:KS
Pool
_ Deck/Patio
_ Sign
Porch
~~
~ ~~-:T:i~
ALmRATI~ ( ?'~
~ $.frytle' Fami.l: -
___ '::I- Y
'l'wo-FamiJ:
_ '!f
_ !t11.ti.-Family
O::mtercial
_ Mmufact:urip.g
Camlies
.L
I
..u
d..
..:L
-L
..L
-.\L
-1
d..
Deficient
Use
tot Width
tot Area
Floodplain _
F.ront Yard
Rear Yard
Side Yard (R)
Side Yard (L)
Parlting
Building Area
Lot Area per Family
Comer I.ot rJjf-
other (specify) tJ/t
Deficiency/Camlet1ts
IV. REVroi AUl'HORITY
The Planning Director, or appropriate designee, ItDJSt approve all plans, except
the following: (l) Alterations or interior \\O~k when the use is confo::ming am
when no change of use is proposed. (2) Maintenarice items, e:.g-.;.... si<:iir}<<;1 windct'iSr
etc., when t.~e use is confonning and when no chanqe of 'USe is pmposed'.
Instances where work o::nplieswith the al::ove cri~ia.. the pel:m.Lt ~, ~ revie<.o.'ed
by the Building Inspector without referral to the Planning Directcr:.
X APPROVED
/ '
Plan Corcmission Action Required
, NO!' APProvED
~ Variance (s) Required r~ ., J {p /' ~ ~
REVW'V"ED BY:
~ \1, lY\pl1'lL-
DATE :
~i06 @~l 111 'l5-~
"
STAFF REPORT
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
JULY 6, 1988
ITEM IV: 1708 HICKORY STREET - Faro and 'Serafina Vitale
GENERAL DESCRIPTION/13ACKGROt1Nn
The applicants are requesting a variance to construct an attached two
car garage with a 5 1/2 ft. side yard setback; whereas Section 30-
15(B) (1) (b) Standards for the R-l Single Family Residence District of
the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance requires a 7 1/2 ft. side yard
setback for attached garages.
On May 18, 1988, the Board of Zoning Appeals denied this variance
request.
The surrounding land use pattern is as follows: the areas to the
north, south, east and west are zoned R-l Single Family Residence with
single family dwellings.
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
In reviewing a variance request, the following questions should
be addressed. Is there an unusual or unique characteristic about
the subject property which creates a ha~dship? Is the hardship
self-created? Is the variance being requ'ested the least possible
to remove any hardship? will granting of the variance have a
considerable adverse impact on the neighboring properties?
The applicants are requesting this variance to allow construction of a
two car attached garage to replace an existing one car attached
garage. The existing one car attached garage meets the required 7 1/2
ft. side yard setback. The requested variance would allow the garage
to extend 2 ft. into the required side yard setback. The applicants
state that without the variance the garag~ would be too narrow for
anything but compact cars.
The house is situated on the north end of the lot. The applicants did
not construct the house, so the hardship is not self-created. There
is no other reasonable alternative for a new attached garage that
would meet the required setbacks and be usable for anything but
compact cars.
The majority of the surrounding single family homes have two car
attached garages. It appears that the granting of this variance would
not have a negative impact on the area.
The variance request is for the least amount of area needed for the
garage, and is equal to the 2 ft. allowed for architectural
projections into required setbacks.
Based on the above, staff recommends approval of the variance as
requested.
~
::t.
J-
f(
o
;:z:
-~-- S (;'1 :
- - /
Ii ;:
It { ~
1 ?
t [1)0
\ ~',
...
; 'fZr
Q.::::.;
:z.C,
~ <::.
-41
lLJ~
~~ I
\ "( tt;l ,
I ~g.:
-' - - - -~'--:'-I
I ~:x:.
I i::_ V _ I
W %i. C\j I
I S"~ I
:~~ I
.~
. ,
=->l"J'v'"M.::l OlS'...dO.'
-:;::;d.:/.:. 0../....-/ SS +-
~ltL
i::~
!-');,...L
"I
><l-
luO
, -L
~'O
o _~
l5! ;
" · 4l
'< : (!)
V)- ;.....-
....\! r-c..;
~:~
- .;j~
--~
I
, I
, . \r. I
ii~~
~ ~ \1-
f>. 0 ~
-f.U
. a
CO
I:~
"i (\( ~I
~ 1;- Ql
.-J ~
!~
41
-
~
.-lJ.J
~:
"'(
----.t
I
I !
i
lL.1
Z.
'<
-J
~
rt:'
o
~
(j
5:
~
~
0'
W
~~\~
(-
j'A>
1<.-
~r;r
,J.\- Y? ~ ~ JZ::yr:r ok ~
r~ ~O~~
r)
4~/J ~~
/~/<~
,
~
,/
~