Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0123812-Building (sign) o OSHKOSH ON THE WATER Job Address 2201 JACKSON ST CITY OF OSHKOSH No 123812 BUILDING PERMIT - APPLICATION AND RECORD Owner JACKSON STREET DEVELOPMENT llC Create Date 03/07/2007 Designer Ann Simon Contractor APPLETON SIGN COMPANY INC Category 254 - Signs Plan Type o Building . Sign o Canopy o Fence o Raze I Zoning Class of Const: Size 148 sq.ft. Unfinished/Basement Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Rooms Height 20 Ft. D Projection I Finished/Living Bedrooms Stories Canopies Garage Baths Signs Foundation 0 Poured Concrete 0 Floating Slab o Concrete Block 0 Post . Pier 0 Other o Treated Wood 3' dia x Tdeep, direct embed Occupancy Permit Not Required Flood Plain Height Permit Park Dedication # Dwelling Units o # Structures Use/Nature Bank I Install one 20'2" high ground sign for Choice Bank with 6x12 ilium cabinet. . Ul#GT307549, electrician is Hullar Electric (note: of Work Hullar Electric shall obtain a local License prior to performing work associated with this sign.) HV AC Contractor Plumbing Contractor Electric Contractor Foes, V"U~ Issued By: $19,666.00 Plan Approval $0.00 Permit Fee Paid $148.00 Park Dedication $0.00 Date 03/15/2007 Final/O.P. 00/00/0000 D Permit Voided I Parcelld # 1219640000 In the performance of this work I agree to perform all work pursuant to rules governing the described construction. While the City of Oshkosh has no authority to enforce easement restrictions of which it is not a party, if you perform the work described in this permit application within an easement, the City strongly urges the permit applicant to contact the easement holder(s) and to secure any necessary approvals before starting such activity. Signature Date AgenVOwner Address 2400 HOllY RD NEENAH WI 54956 - 1012 Telephone Number 920-734-1601 To schedule inspections please call the Inspection Request line at 236-5128 noting the Address, Permit Number, Type of Inspection (i.e. Footing, Service, Final, etc.), Access into Building if Secure (how do we gain entry), your Name and Phone Number. Unless specified otherwise, we will assume the project is ready at the time the request is received. Work may continue if the inspection is not performed within two business days from the time the project is ready. CITY OF OSHKOSH - DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW - ZONING Location of Property: 2201 Jackson Street (Choice Bank) Date Rec' d: 03/06/07 Applicant Name: Ann Simon. Appleton Sign Phone: 920-378-0967 Fax: 920-734-1601 Applicant Address: 2400 Holly Road City: Neenah State: WI Zip: 54956 Owner: Jackson Street Development LLC Parcel Number(s): 12-1964-0000 Zoning: C-2 Type of Construction: Install a 20'2" high ground sign for Choice Bank Compliance Checklist Use Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area Floodplain Airport Height Front Setback Comer-Side Setback Interior-Side Setback Rear Setback Building Area Access Regulations Parking Standards Loading Standards Vision Clearance Trans. Yard Standards Screening Landscaping Lighting Signage Mechanical Screening Var.lCUP/PD Conditions Other: Comments/Conditions 1. NOTE: Board of Appeals granted variance (02/14/07) to allow sign setback to be 10' on Jackson Street. 2. CONDITION: Per condition of approval from Board of Appeals, the sign base shall be landscaped with low-level plantings. 3. NOTE: Proposed signage area is approximately 148 square feet total (12' x 6'2" = 74 square feet per side). Approved. ***$25.00 review fee not collected. Applicant must remit payment prior to permit being issued*** Review Fee: $25.00 D Approved [8] Approved w/Conditions D Denied D Hold Reviewed by: Todd Muehrer Review Date: 03/07/07 Please contact the Zoning Administrator at 920.236.5057 if you have any questions. REVIEW AUTHORITY As per Section 30-5 Enforcement of the City Zoning Ordinance, the Director of Community Development, or designee, must approve all plans, except the following: (1) Alterations or interior work when the use is conforming and when no change in use is proposed. (2) Maintenance items, e.g. siding, windows, etc., when the use is conforming and when no change is proposed. COPY: Planning Address File BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES FEBRUARY 14,2007 PRESENT: Dan Carpenter, Robert Cornell, Larry Lang, Edward Wilusz, Cheryl Hentz EXCUSED: Dennis Penney, Moss Ruedinger STAFF: David Buck, Principal Planner; Todd Muehrer, Associate Planner/Zoning Administrator; Deborah Foland, Recording Secretary; Karin Gehrke, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 3:30 pm by Chairperson Hentz. Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present. The minutes of January 10, 2007 were corrected to show Moss Ruedinger was excused, not present, at the meeting. With the incorporation of that correction, the minutes were then approved as distributed. Lang/Cornell 5-0. I. 2201 JACKSON STREET Choice Bank-applicant, Tom Rusch-owner, request a variance to permit a sign with a setback of 10' on Jackson Street. Section 30-25 (B)(2) of the Oshkosh Municipal Code: C-2 General Commercial District of the City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance requires a 25' front yard setback. It should be noted this is the second hearing for this application. The original hearing occurred on November 8, 2006 and was denied 2-3. Choice Bank-applicant, has altered their proposal and is requesting the second hearing. Generally speaking, there are two significant changes since the original hearing. One, the applicant is now proposing to construct a pylon sign instead of a monument sign. Two, the applicant is now proposing a front yard setback of only 10' instead of 12' . Mr. Muehrer presented the item and distributed photos of the subject site. Ms. Hentz questioned the fact that other businesses with signs in the setback area were being displayed in the photos. She stated that, in the past, the board was not allowed to take into consideration previous applications when reviewing a current one. Mr. Buck responded that these photos were to help put things into context and basically show what is in the area surrounding the applicant's property. Mr. Lang questioned if this was a new application and if so, was the review fee paid a second time. Mr. Buck replied that it was a new application and the necessary fees had been submitted. Ann Simon, Appleton Sign Company, 2400 Holly Road, Neenah, distributed photos of the site and stated that she felt that the pylon sign being submitted for review was aesthetically pleasing to the eye and would not be blocked from visibility by the power box from the neighboring apartment building. Board of Appeals Minutes February 14,2007 She was hoping to obtain approval of this sign option with a 10' setback as visibility of it would be compromised if it were to be set back further from the street. Mr. Lang questioned if the bank owned or leased this building and if the building was newly constructed or if it previously existed. Stan Liedel, Choice Bank, 2450 Witzel A venue, replied the building was newly constructed and leased by the bank. Mr. Lang referenced the photos in the staff report displaying other businesses with signs in the setback area. He asked how long the signs have been there. Mr. Liedel stated that he did not know, but he would guess five to ten years. Mr. Lang asked if they were assuming that since old signs were approved that this sign would be permissible as well. Mr. Liedel responded that the neighboring duplexes were too close to the street for their sign to be seen at a safe distance. He felt that it was a safety issue, as traffic would not have ample time to stop to avoid missing the bank's driveway without the sign at a more visible location. Mr. Lang inquired if there was a vertical limit on signage. Mr. Muehrer replied that the vertical limit was 30 feet. Mr. Lang asked if the sign could be placed on the top of the building instead. Mr. Buck responded that it could not as roof signs are not permitted in the City. Mr. Cornell commented that although the sign situation may be self-created, he felt that this proposal was a more reasonable request than the initial application. Mr. Liedel stated that the initial proposal was based on the fact that a sign had existed at this location previously and they assumed that a variance would be granted to place one there again. Mr. Carpenter asked where all the signs came from that are currently in the setback area. Mr. Liedel replied that they were temporary signs for construction purposes and would be removed. Mr. Carpenter inquired how tall the low-level plantings would be that are being applied as a condition to the approval of the pylon sign. Mr. Buck responded that they would be less than 24 inches at maturity and would not interfere with visibility. Mr. Wilusz commented that the combination of commercial and residential properties seems to create a unique situation. Mr. Buck replied that in most areas high-density commercial properties are surrounded by multi-family apartments and then graduate to residential properties. The unique situation here is that the commercial properties were developed prior to the residential area. Board of Appeals Minutes 2 February 14,2007 Ms. Hentz asked if it would be a safe assumption that the applicant had no objections to the plantings around the base of the sign. She also inquired why the applicant changed their request from a 12-foot setback to a 10- foot one. Mr. Liedel responded that they had no objections to the plantings. Ms. Simon added that the change in the setback was due to safety concerns in winter with ice and snow build up. They wanted to make sure the sign was far enough from the driveway to prevent someone from sliding into it. Mr. Lang asked if the placement of the sign was not part of the original building plan. Mr. Liedel replied that the monument sign on the initial application was part of the original plan. Mr. Lang inquired if the applicant was then assuming that a variance would be granted as the original plan did not allow for the required setback or if the zoning code was not looked into at the time. Mr. Liedel responded that they had not checked into what the zoning ordinance was for signs and had assumed since they were essentially replacing an existing sign in that location that it would not be a problem. Mr. Lang commented that it was his impression that the applicant assumed that since someone else had a sign in this location that they would be able to obtain approval for their sign as well. He felt that this was an owner caused hardship since the building was constructed with a minimum setback, which did not leave sufficient area to erect a sign. He would not support this variance request. Mr. Cornell stated that he had safety concerns with the original application for a monument sign but he feels that this has been adequately addressed with the new application for a pylon sign and he would not have an issue supporting this variance. Mr. Wilusz commented that he felt it was somewhat of a unique situation and he felt that the zoning codes should allow a business owner to advertise their location. He felt that it was a well-designed proposal and he would not have a problem supporting the variance. Mr. Cornell added that part of the analysis of granting a variance is ifit would harm public interest. He felt that since the safety concerns had been addressed that it would not be any harm to the public and he would support granting this variance as well. Ms. Hentz stated that she felt it was human nature to assume that since an existing sign had been located in this location that a new one could be erected in its place. She also felt that since the safety concerns with the monument sign had been addressed that she would be in favor of granting the variance also. Motion by Carpenter to approve the request for a variance to permit a sign with a setback of 10 J on Jackson Street with the follOWing condition: (a) The sign base shall be landscaped with low-level plantings. Seconded by Cornell. Motion carried 4-1. Ayes-Carpenter/Cornell/Wilusz/Hentz. Nays-Lang. Board of Appeals Minutes 3 February 14,2007 ~ ~ . .~---t .... 'T --..ur'" . - ,.- - I \1\\ ~'T- -- , I I i i >- ! I 0;::: --' i ~~ --' c:( i i :z , ~I i 1=' I l;l ~ i lG , \ , i~ a: ~ l~ ~l 1 ~ w ~ I = . S;; ~ I~ I- ~l i j~ :::; ~ ~ t=l . .,.; I l~ "" ~ ::.c::;$: ::':E ~, I ~ "-" ~l~ = , ~I I- ;:;:;I~ 1~ w :z "'" ::E !~ "" I~ ~ :z CJ = (...:1'1 :2: = ~i:5 I;s; ~ = .., =I~ ~ ,= "'" ffi 0 en ~ ~!~ ""'I I"'" L:E :;;; "" --' =,= 1= 5 E!l~ :3 ~ ::E --' :z u:.i!;;i; ~ C?I~ ,~ !;;;: I~ "'" ~ ffi c:( 0 ~ ~I:E ~ I ~t~ Is ::E ~I= ffi "" I- --' ""I~ !;;;: i'E <r.l >- EEj:= ~l~ I! := gl5 !;;;: """ ~ 0.. <3 :a "-" :a ~ gg ~l~ ~ ~I~ !;;;; ~ !;;;; l~ I- u.. ~IF 2. C a E ~~ ~ "" ~ ~J :z ~ =1"'- s: I~ ~~ "" a c:( c t:; cc, a:: .... en ~l I.... "" 1.I.lI!Q: Cf) a: .... "'" ... w w .... 1 c:> c..:> c..:> Ii ~. --Iu..r== en =: "" I- "" !i18 ~ :;: ~Ii; ~lcS ... ;:::: l- e;; cSl "" c:> c:( c:( .... c..:> "" :z ... 1-1 ... ~.t c..:>"",c..:> = c..> :iE ... ~I "'" ~ 1 <= ii: ... I __L~ __L_ :;;; a:> :::> -- I ~~-- ....,L_ -- c:( --' -~T~ I.... ' I ' ::! - "'" "" "'I ~j= -l~ '" ::! ~ u.. 1 I j~ -- - >- CCI "'CI '" > Cl .. '" CI. ... CI. '" c:c CI ~Yi t '"' '" .,9 ~ 8 u c~ c: b' o '" ~ '"' 0,0 c: c: '- 0 s (l) ~ c: ~-' ~ ~ .~ ..., a,~ c: Cl. s- o ~ "Sit ~~ ~ ~ 8 VI ~ (l)Cl. ~ 2! .: :=.::<r.l 26 ~~~ .... '" '" c,,)""">j;! C;2~ =_0 c,,)o ..... ..... 0 ~ 0 ~ " !21 .. 01 .. .. 01 II> = I c Cl ~l .., = ';; '" '" .., CI '" a. ... I ~ ~ I~ I~ (') co . to '( ~ 0 "'" . .. .. 0 co = "C 0 Cl . 00 II> = co > ... Cl ,... ~j ".t:= .. 2 Cry '" '" - 'S' c .., II> .. = .. a. '3: '" II> e 'ii '" ;;; ... CI. - .. .. '" II> Cl CI c:n CI a:: l- NN _N ~~ d>~ ",tv> "'..... .q-~ ",0 ~g .X "'" '" ","'- <: . "'- ",0 z~ -c~ "'tv> 0..... ""~ >.0 =N 0<>'1 ::J:- '" 0<: 00 .q-"", N Q. ~ ll:; l::i .... ~ Cii ~ ~ ll:; l::i ~ a ... is !!;. ~ ~ e- ll:; l::i l::i . ~ ~ ~ ~ - L ~t~t ~i~I -i -i f N ~ ~ ~ i!i . ~ .... !!:: ~ .... ~ ~ L ~ Cii ~ I.;; ~ 0 ~ i!i ~ Co ~ 0 N ~ L ~ 0 to > -' -' <:t c=:: a::: Ll.I I- ~ '.. 1 ' \. 1 i',i I ! ; ~i ~ .~ ~ ~j ~ ~I~I ~E""S: ~I,' r-. ~lre i---- ~J ~ 81~ ~ ~j~ ~ 2:!Q.- ~ ~i~ ~ ~i~ ~II~ ~ ~l~ Co:) co ~ :;;;: Eej~ ~ ~ ~I~ s= ~!~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ a5i~ ~ ~ ~l~ ii ~19 ~ ~ ~! as ~IB ~ ~ t <:li ~I ~ ~' ....... ....thO... ...... ..0.... ...... ....... ~iMl::' U':1 CCli __' _ ---1..__ .0..... -.~T =1 =, ~i ~I =' ~I' ::::; :E ;;:a: I ~ ~I ~ ~~ Cf ~ I II !I ~~ L~!~ III !~ ~L~j ffi "" 8 "" iE t; ~ cs >- = "'" ... =- co ... ... CI. ~ CI. '" <:t Q ~~ t '" ",Q ~ 8 b~ c: c- I..J ~~ 0>0 . c: C:o ~ '" ~ c: "'0-' ,.., ~.~ ..... .....' ~.~ ~~ ~2 Vi I..J Vi '" '" ..... ~ ~ I..J ~ ~2- i..:: " I I I I i ~ !~ ~ l~ ~ !~ 5i I~ ~ I~ :E l~ i2 !gs ~ I;I: ~ 01 ~I 3' "'" 1.'-1 "1(" jg ,= ,= ~l I~I ~i l~ a: ! Ie;: ~l l~ ~I l~ ;I~ I~ !;:!!~ I~ ;Zl~ ~ :li~1 ~ d~ ...:x: ~I~ ~~ ~ I~ 00 ~ ~r~ e 9 Q",!B ~ 0 I!:I cc: Co:J ,0 ,.... ~ ...q;;'l~ l;:-~ wZ Zc.c oV,i :::::;;;: <:t 0 I- -' en> ~~ ~a <:to ~~ C3~ a:~ ~::j u.. _ I:;! :5..... l~ B .L , I.... , ~ ~ =-=:Ci:i ~ 25 3: <1:'" I~ ="i3 ..c w'" '" Co) , C> """ C;z ..<:: '" =~ 0 Co) 0 N '" N en 2: "'" "Cl <I: ~ I: .1 .S c:3 Ie .1 flHS/IH,,7ItIA11J,,} ,,0' IE Ie' flHS/IH "lIN/81t3"} ,,(; . 19 .1 flHS/1H '3"{J) ,,0 . l17l flHS/1H ItO} ,,(; . ,0(; ,e (NOIlItUNOOi) ,,0' IL 03/15/2007 THU 9:56 FAX 920734 1622 Appleton Sign ~ . ~002/002 311512ID7 9:49 AM STEEL COLUMN DESIGN Project: Name / Descript: DESCRIPTION Ref: MarJUal of Steel Construction, A/SC 9th Edmon Description 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Areas Subject to Wind Forces Height Width Area (ft ft 6.00 12.00 Wind (pst) 32.8 Calculation of Design Forces at Critical Heights Y (ft) @ grade M (#') 40,153 V (#) 2,362 y (ft) M (#') V (#) ~ Column Support Design Table #of Column Column Length Start End Sleeve S act f/) Cols Type Size Elev Elev Depth (P, TS) (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) (in^3) (kst) 1 P 8"(.322) N/A 16.80 28.7 FALSE FALSE #DIV/O! FALSE FALSE #DIV/O! FALSE FALSE #DIV/O! FALSE FALSE #DIV/O! FALSE FALSE #DIV/O! AflowableBending Stresses Column Column Criteria Stress increase factor: 1-33 Typ.t;~ Size p 8"(.322) d1t <:3300/Fy so... Fb= O.66Fy= 30.7 ksi FALSE help #N/A so... Fb= .:#NIA #NtA ksi FALSE help #N/A SOm Fb~ .JI.N/A #N/A ksi FALSE help #N/A so... Fb= #N/A #N/A ksi FALSE help #N/A so... Fb= #N1A #N/A ksi FALSE help #N/A so... Fb= #NJA #NJA ksi 13/1S!2007 THU "." FAX '20. "'-'.'22 A~.l.'on S'.n LA TERAL BEARING PIER AND CAISSON FOOTINGS Project: Name Descript: DESCRIPTION Ref: Uniform Building Code 1994 (Sec. 1806.7) # Footings::: Pass lat soil res, q= 1 200 pSf Moment/Footing, M= Composite Centroid, h= Equiv Concentrated Load, P= M/h::: Rectangular Pier Width, W= Length,L= Depth, D= (A/2)(1+ SOR(1 + (4.36h)/A))= S1 = (2)(q)(D/3)= b= Sqrt(W^2 + L ^2)= A= (2.34)(P) I (S1)(b)>:!' Diameter, b= Depth, D= (A/2)(1+ SOR(1 + (4.36h)/A))= S1 = (q)(2)(D/3)= A= (2.34 P) I (S1)(b)= 5.0 7.0 7.5 ft, parallel to sign face ft, perpendicular to sign face ft 997 8.6 2.0 psf 11 Round Caisson 3.00 7.04 ft, round augered hole ft 950 1.94 psf Foundation Bearing Check 40,153 17.00 2,362 Allowable Bearing Pressure= 1,330 psf, 1994 UBC table 18-1-A, at grade Square Round SignWt= Ib Base Wt:;: 39,590 Ib Area= 35.0 sq ft q max= 1,131 psf, soil OK, with depth increase Sign Wt= Ib Base Wt= 7,465 lb Area= 7.1 sq ft. q max= 1,056 psf,soil OK, with depth increase Concrete Volume Outside Width of Column~ Depth of Column in Footing= Volume of Concrete per Footing= Total Order Volume of Concrete= 8.625 in 7 11 1.6 cubic yards (+-) . 1.6 cubic yards (+-) ~OOl/001 311~7 12:06 PM Ib-ft ft Ib ~ ~~r ~ i ~ ~~d u m ~~"~ n a 1ll\l~H;g3 ~i~~ 6 n i~h J s 8 "ii~~ li I ~ 6"m:.l); !O! m~!" a . ~!liii~ III ~ . 8~6il1 ~:z - nil 1 ~ i o@ I I ~ R R i ~ i I I ~ ! I ~ I s I ~ I ~ I. 0 Ul S:! "tI Z - Gl ~ " I B i ~ ! . sU . I ~ I U I ~ i . - i @ @ @J @ e e e e e eeeG 8 i i! ~ I ~ U! UI ~I i i I i I ~ · ~~ ~ ~ I !~!l ~~. h ! ~ m h ~ i h ~ I . nlllll ~I m ; ! ~ j ~ ~ I' j i I ~I~ II u ~ II ~ ~ I "I fi I d fi" ~~ p ~ I iiI ~ ~~ ~ m ~~ II ~~ i m ~ t5 ~ ~21 i ~~ "Im~ ~ ~ . ~ ! pi III P P ".)> ~ il~~ nil UIHI t ~ ~ ~ I!l~ 5 ~ffi ~ I~ F- ~ ~ I ~,,~ ~I ~ I 0 Im~ ~~ I a~~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~. I!l 8 ~ ! r- ~~ n~ ~ iI~ I g II nlll,ii I i ~~ ~ g. m Ul ~n ~. .. Iii Ii UP Iii ~ ~~~ mB ~!~ I~ ~ ~il ~i ~ I~ ~!~ !!! I~ Id ~H~I iil en n ~ ~I ~II ~ I~i.~ ~ ~ ~I ~ IIi ~ ~~ ~~ i I II . ~ ~eeE~e~~2~~'" ilP~iPnln~ ndlulPI~ x II BI.~.i ~~ ! E I i ~ ~ i ~ I . ~ ~ i co "'n 0 6... U1 '" .J>.. c . m" 0'1 @J@@JEl0 !!! Inn ~ ..~~.;;: np~12 IIpl~ Inr! I i ~ ~ .. *PI~U ~~I ~p iI~1 I ; I . PBl~ ~ , ~ , * ~!!! _iil ; "tI ~~ 1, CONCRETE SIDEWALK ~~~ ~ ro", *Sc Nr-Ul ~o-< ~t5~ I . I I II --l il ~ '" .! g:;; II ~ () 8~~ i \ .1 \I i I I n "tl I .... i t> I~ ~ ~ I~ e I I I_I p?! !~ ~ Gl m c Ul iiI "tI ~ r- ~:o: SAN 6"RCCP to <: ,. .. 36"RCCP t SS CHOICE BANK ~~ ~ ~ ~- JACICSON STREET DEVELOPMENT llC ~i "lIl 2201 JAO<SON STREET, OSHKOSH, WI 81 I I :0: I I ~ EEl . I ! \~ ~ ~ I ~\. ~a ~ ~. ss ~ul h ; Iii ~ Page 1 of1 Dannhoff, Allyn J. From: Ann Simon [anns@appletonsign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11 :02 AM To: 'Ann Simon'; 'Muehrer, Todd M.'; 'Dannhoff, Allyn J.' Subject: RE: Choice Bank Sign Permit Application - Site Plan Attached "".,.,...,',.',._,'-". . . ...... .. SORRY---- The UL# is GT 307549. -----Original Message----- From: Ann Simon [mailto:anns@appletonsign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:57 AM To: 'Muehrer, Todd M. 'i 'Dannhoff, Allyn J.' Subject: Choice Bank Sign Permit Application - Site Plan Attached Gentlemen, With the zoning review that Todd completed and approved yesterday, I believe the attached site plan will now complete the package required for the sign permit. I'm going to put the check into the mail today. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best regards, Ann Ann Simon Appleton Sign Direct: 920-378-0967 Fax: 920-734-1601 anns@appletonsign.com *** FYI ******************************* Choice Bank's location at 2201 N. Jackson Street The cost of the sign is $19,666. The electrician is Hullar Electric, 4932 9th Street Rd., Oshkosh, WI 54904, (920) 233-3667 Please let me know if you need anything other than the permit check in the mail ($88 +$114 +25 = $227). Thanks much for your help! The UL# is GT 307549. 3/8/2007