The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-210 JUNE 27, 2006 06-210 RESOLUTION (CARRIED___7-0__LOST________LAID OVER________WITHDRAWN________) PURPOSE:APPROVE & SUBMIT COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT / WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INITIATED BY:DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the 2005 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report, having been reviewed, is approved, and the proper City officials are authorized and directed to submit the Report to the Department of Natural Resources. COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Influent Flow and Loading Page 1 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Influent Flow and Loading (Continued) Number of times the flow and C BOD exceeded 90% or 100% of desi n, oints earned, and score: Was the influent flow meter calibrated in the last ear? . o Yes Enter last calibration date, MM/DD/YVYY I 05/12/2006 No -explain Sewer Use Ordinance 5.1 Did your community have a sewer use ordinance that limited or prohibited the discharge of excessive conventional pollutants ((C)BOD, SS, or pH) or toxic substances to the sewer from industries, commercial users, hauled waste, or residences? . Yes o No If No, please describe: Page 2 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Influent Flow and Loading (Continued) 5.2 Was it necessary to enforce? o Yes . No If Yes, please describe: I 6.2.1 If yes to any of the above, please explain if plant performance is affected when receiving any of these wastes I No detrimental performance observed. Pretreatment 7.1 Did your facility experience operational problems, permit violations, biosolids quality concerns or hazardous situations in the sewer system or treatment plant that were attributable to commercial or industrial discharges in the last year? o Yes . No If Yes, describe the situationand your community's response: I 7.2 Did your facility accept hauled industrial wastes, landfill leachate, etc? o Yes . No If yes, describe the types of wastes received and any procedures or other restrictions that were in place to protect the plant from the discharge of hauled industrial wastes. I Page 3 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance ((C)BOD) NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 violations occurred, what action was taken to re Iiance? Was the effluent flow meter calibrated in the last ear? . o Yes - enter last calibration date, MOIDAYIYEAR: No - explain: I 09/21/2005 Page 4 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance ((C)BOD) (Continued) roblems, if an ,were ex erienced over the last ear that threatened treatment? Other Monitorin and Limits 5.1 At any time in the past year was there an exceedance of a permit limit for any other pollutants suchas metals, pH, residual chlorine, or fecal coliform? o Yes . No If Yes, please describe: I 5.2At any time in the past year was there an effluent acute or chronic whole effluent toxicity (WET) test? . Yes o No If Yes, please describe: WET test perfomed July 12, 2005. Both passed. 5.31f the biomonitoring (WET) test did not pass, were steps taken to identify and/or reduce source(s) of toxicity? o Yes o No . NA Please explain unless not applicable: I Total Points Generated ~~ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) i_ Section Grade ~ Page 5 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Total Suspended Solids) NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 Total Points Generated _ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) ~ Section Grade ~ Page 6 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Note: Limit exceedances are considered for monthly OR weekly averages but not both. When a monthly average limit exists it will be used to detect exceedances and generate points. This will be true even if a weekly limit also exists. When a weekly average limit exists and a monthly limit does not exist, the weekly limit will be used to detect exceedances and generate points. Page 7 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Ammonia = NH3) (Continued) If an violations occurred, what action was taken to re ain com Iiance? Total Points Generated __ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) iIIR Section Grade .. Page 8 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/2/2006 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Phosphorus) NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 If an Total Points Generated ~~ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) ._ Section Grade __ Page 9 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management 1.1 How did you use or dispose of your biosolids?(Check all that apply) [2] Land Applied Under Your Permit o Publicly Distributed Exceptional Quality Biosolids o Hauled to Another Permitted Facility o Landfilled o Incinerated D Other NOTE:lf you do not remove biosolids from your system annually, please describe your system typ such as lagoons, reed beds, recirculating sand filters, etc, and if biosolids were land applied last year, please also check top box above. 1.1.1 If you checked Other, Please describe: I Land Application Site: Last Year's Approved and Active Land Application Sites 2.1.1 How many acres did you have? 2.1.2 How many acres did you use? 670 acres 535 acres 2.2 If you did not have enough acres for your land application needs, what action was taken? I I 2.3 Did you overapply nitrogen on any of your approved land application sites you used las 0 year? Yes(30 points) . No 2.4 Have all the sites you used last year for land application been soil tested in the previous 0 4 years? Yes o No (10 points) ON/A Biosolids Metals Number of biosolids outfalls in your WPDES permit = 1 3.1 For each outfall tested, verify the biosolids metal quality values for your facility during the last calendar year BIOSOLlDS METALS CHARACTERISTICS utfall:002 - Cake sludge Page 10 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Parameter 80% of H.Q. Ceiling mg/kg on a dry weight basis Times Exceeded Limit Limit Limit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 80% High Ceiling Value Quality arsenic 41 75 14 11 11 19 18 4.5 0 0 cadmium 39 85 <2.5 2.6 2 2.2 2.7 2.2 0 0 copper 1500 4300 762 800 744 784 857 714 0 0 lead 300 840 35 43 52 53 53 48 0 0 mercury 17 57 1.1 1.2 .74 .9 1.3 1.8 0 0 molybdenum 60 75 17 17 19 23 23 19 0 0 nickel 336 420 18 20 24 21 26 25 0 0 selenium 80 100 7.2 3.3 3.5 4.6 4.5 3.6 0 0 zinc 2800 7500 784 800 785 934 1136 941 0 0 3.1.1 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the high quality limits OR 80% of the limit for 0 molybdenum, nickel or selenium = 0 Exceedance Points . 0 o Points 0 1-2 10 Points 0 >2 15 Points 3.1.2 If you exceeded the high quality limits, did you cumulatively track the metals loadings at each 0 land application site? (check applicable box) 0 Yes 0 No (10 points) . NA. Did not exceed limits or no HQ limit applies (0 points) 0 NA. Did not land apply biosolids until limit was met(O points) 3.1.3 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the ceiling limits = 0 0 Exceedance Points . 0 o Points 0 1 10 Points 0 > 1 15 Points 3.1.4 Were biosolids land applied which exceeded the ceiling limit? 0 0 Yes(20 points) . No (0 points) 3.1.5 If any metal limit (high quality or ceiling) was exceeded at any time, what action was taken? Has the source of the metals been identifed? Page 11 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Upathogen Control(per outfall): I Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 01/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 01/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 03/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C. Page 12 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 05/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 07/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C. Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 09/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C. Page 13 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Outfall Number: 002 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit Sample Dates: 11/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 Density: Sample Concentratinor Amount: Process: ANAER Process Description: MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME GREATER THAN 15 DAYS @ 35 DEGREES C. 4.1 If exceeded Class B limit or did not meet the process criteria at the time of land application(40 Points) 4.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time? 0 Yes . No If yes, what action was taken? I I Vector Attraction Reduction(per outfall):O Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 02/09/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 54.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 02/09/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 54.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 04/13/2005 Page 14 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 55.1 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 04/13/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 55.1 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 06/08/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 60.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 06/08/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 60.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 08/23/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 49.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 08/23/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 49.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 10/19/2005 Page 15 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 60.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 10/19/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 60.5 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 11/23/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 56.1 Outfall Number: 002 Method Date: 11/23/2005 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: VSR Limit (if applicable): 38 Results (if applicable): 56.1 5.1 If the limit or criteria was exceeded at the time of land application, 40 point 0 5.1.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at any time? 0 Yes . No If yes, what action was taken? I I Biosolids Storage:O 6.1 How many days of actual,current biosolids storage capacity did your wastewater treatment 0 facility have either on-site or off-site? . >+ 180 days (0 points) 0 150 - 179 days (10 points) 0 120 - 149 days (20 points) 0 90 - 119 days (30 points) 0 < 90 days (40 points) Page 16 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/26/2006 Biosolids Quality and Management (Continued) o Not Applicable (0 points) 6.2 If you check Not Applicable above, explain why. Issues: 7.1 Describe any outstanding biosolids issues with treatment, use or overall mgt? Total Points Generated 11IIII Score (100 - Total Points Generated) ~ Section Grade !lIB Page 17 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants) Was your wastewater treatment plant adequately staffed last year? . Yes o No If No, please describe: I Could use more helplstaff for: I Did your wastewater staff have adequate time to properly operate and maintain the plant and fulfill all wastewater management tasks including recordkeeping? . Yes o No. Explain Did your plant have a documented AND implemented plan for preventative maintenance on major 0 equipment items? . Yes (Continue with questions below) o No (40 points and go to question 6) If No, explain: I Did this preventative maintenance program depict frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, and 0 other tasks necessary for each piece of equipment? . Yes o No (10 points) Were these preventative maintenance tasks, as well as major equipment repairs, recorded and 0 filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly? . Yes o (Paper file system) o (Computer program) . (Both Paper and Computer) o No (10 points) Did your plant have a detailed O&M Manual that was used as a reference when needed? . Yes o No Rate the overall maintenance of your wastewater plant. . Excellent Page 18 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants) (Continued) 0 Very Good 0 Good 0 Fair 0 Poor Describe your rating: I Detailed capital investment program implemented. 1 Total Points Generated _ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) iIlmi!II Section Grade .. Page 19 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Operator Certification and Education Did you have a designated operator-in-charge during the report year? . o Yes (0 point) No (20 points) I Thomas E Kruzick Certification No: I 07738 Name: In accordance with Chapter NR 114.08 and 114.09, Wisconsin Administrative Code, what grade and subclass(es) were required for the operator-in-charge to operate the wastewater treatment plant and what grade and subclass(es) were held by the operator-in-charge? Required: Grade 4 Advanced Subclasses A,C,E,F,G,I,J Held: Grade 4 Advanced Subclass A,B,E,F,G,I,J Grade T Subclass D,H Was the operator-in-charge certified at the appropriate level to operate this plant? o . Yes (0 point) o No (20 points) In the event of the loss of your designated operator-in-charge, did you have a contingency plan to 0 ensure the continued proper operation & maintenance of the plant that includes one or more of the following options (check all that apply): 4.1 181 4.2 D 4.3 D 4.4 0 4.5 D 4.6 D Explain: one or more additional certified operators on staff an arrangement with another certified operator an arrangement with another community with a certified operator an operator on staff who has an operator-in-training certificate for your plant and is expected be certified within one year a consultant to serve as your certified operator None of the above (20 points) If you had a designated operator-in-charge, was the operator-in-charge earning continuing education credits at the following rates? Grades T, 1, and 2: . Averaging 6 or more CEUs per year o Averaging less than 6 CEUs per year Grades 3 and 4: . Averaging 8 or more CEUs per year o Averaging less than 8 CEUs per year Not applicable: Page 20 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 5/19/2006 Operator Certification and Education (Continued) o · See Question 1. Total Points Generated _ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 1Ii_ Section Grade ... Page 21 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Financial Management Name: I Ed Nokes (920) 236-5005 Telephone: E-Mail Address(optional): Are User Charge or other Revenues sufficient to cover O&M Expenses for your wastewater 0 treatment plant ANDIOR collection system? . Yes (0 points) o No (40 points) If No, please explain: I When was the User Charge System or other revenue source(s) last reviewed and/or revised? 0 Year: 2004 . 0-2 years ago (0 points) o 3 or more years ago (20 points) o Not Applicable (Private Facility) Did you have a special account (e.g., CWFP required segregated Replacement Fund, etc.) or 0 financial resources available for repairing or replacing equipment for your wastewater treatment plant andlor collection system? . Yes o No (40 points) REPLACEMENT FUNDS(PUBLlC MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SHALL COMPLETE QUESTION 5) Equipment Replacement Funds 5.1 When was the Equipment Replacement Fund last reviewed andlor revised? Year: 2004 o . 1-2 years ago (0 points) o 3 or more years ago (20 points) o Not Applicable Explain: 5.2 Equipment Replacement Fund Activity 5.2.1 Ending Balance Reported on Last Year's CMAR: 5.2.2 Adjustments if necessary (e.g., earned interest, audit correction, withdrawal of excess funds, increase making up previous shortfall, etc.) 5.2.3 Adjusted January 1st Beginning Balance 5.2.4 Additions to Fund (e.g., portion of User Fee, earned interest, etc.) $2820935.37 + $0.00 $2,820,935.37 + $363,512.85 Page 22 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Financial Management (Continued) 5.2.5 Subtractions from Fund (e.g., equipment replacement, major repairs - use description box 5.2.5.1 below*.) 5.2.6 Ending Balance as of December 31st for CMAR Reporting Year $0.00 $3,184,448.22 (All Sources: This ending balance should include all Equipment Replacement Funds whether held in a bank account(s), certificate(s) of deposit, etc.) *5.2.5.1. Indicate adjustments, equipment purchases and/or major repairs from 5.2.5 above 2005 Backup Generators will be included in 2006 ERF revisions. All other equipment for 2005 funded through operations accounts. 5.3 What is the minimum required replacement fund balance? (If you had a CWFP loan, this balance was originally based on the Financial Assistance Agreement (FAA) and should have been updated in subsequent years.) $4,032,144.63 5.3.1 Is the Dec. 31 Ending Balance equal to or greater than the minimum required replacement fund balance (#5.3)? o Yes . No Explain: Equipment replacement fund schedules to be updated and adjusted during rate study scheduled for 2006 Future Planning 6.1 During the next ten years, will you be involved in formal planning for upgrading, rehabilitating or new construction of your treatment facility or collection system? . Yes (If yes, please provide major project information) o No Project Description Estimated Cost Approximate Construction Year Additional Aeration Basin 2 Final Clarifiers $2700000 $2600000 2012 2012 Financial Management General Comments: Total Points Generated __ Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 11I_ Section Grade _ Page 23 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems Do you have a Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance(CMOM) requirement in your WPDES permit? o Yes . No Did you have a documented (written records/files, computer files, video tapes, etc.) sanitary sewer 0 collection system operation & maintenance or CMOM program last calendar year? . Yes (go to question 3) o No (30 points) (go to question 4) Check the elements listed below that are included in your Operation and Maintenance (O&M) or CMOM program.: [8J Goals: specific identification of major goals of your O&M/CMOM program such a III reduction, basement backup and SSO reductions, repair and rehabilitation of sewers, system cleaning and monitoring, etc. Organization: identification of those managers and persons who are responsible for implementing your O&M/CMOM program and reporting sanitary sewer overflows Legal Authority: sufficient authority, through sewer use ordinances, service agreements or other legally binding documents to control infiltration/inflow sources, proper design, construction, inspection and testing of new and rehabilitated sewers and laterals and address flows from satellite collection systems, if present. Maintenance Activities: routine preventative O&M activities, including adequate maintenance of facilities and equipment. By the use of: sewer system monitoring; inspections; a system to identify infiltrationlinflow sources (including private property); a system for replacement part inventories; control of fat, oil & grease; employee training program; and a management system for the collection and use of information to establish O&M priorities Design and Performance Standards: establish requirements and standards for design, installation and inspection of new sewers, service laterals, pump stations and sewer rehabilitation projects. Overflow Emergency Response Plan: documented procedures for responding to SSOs, power outages, lift station failures sewer blockages or any other similar events of an emergency nature. Capacity Assurance: a program to assess the current capacity of the collection system to identify problems or bottlenecks; and if required, a System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP). Annual Self-Auditing of your O&M/CMOM Program to ensure above components are being implemented, evaluated, and re-prioritized as needed. Special Studies (if applicable): any special studies undertaken such as III Analysis, Sewer System Evaluation Surveys (SSES), I or sewer pipe studies. Please list the study reports of the last year below: [8J [8J [2] [2] o D D D Page 24 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued) Did your sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program include the following maintenance activities? Complete all that apply and indicate the amount maintained: Cleaning 121.9 r/o of system/year 11.47 r/o of system/year 10 r/o of systemlyear 10 r/o of systemlyear 11.82 r/o of systemlyear 119.81 ria of system/year 175 r per L.S/year 11.5 rlo of manholes rehabed 10.79 ria of sewer lines rehabed 10 r/o of systemlyear 10 r/o of private services Root Removal Flow Monitoring Smoke Testing Sewer Line Televising Manhole Inspections Lift Station O&M Manhole Rehabilitation Mainline Rehabilitation Private Sewer Inspections Private Sewer III Removal Please include additional comments about your sanitary sewer collection system below: Provide the following collection system and flow information for the past year: o 125.6 131.57 1263 Total Actual Amount of Precipitation Last Year Annual Average Precipitation (for your location) Miles of Sanitary Sewer Page 25 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued) 17 Number of Lift Stations 10 10 10 Number of Lift Station Failure Number of Sewer Pipe Failures Number of Sanitary Sewer OverFlow (SSO) Occurrences:(1 0 points per occurrence) 117 172 110.08 111.3 Number of Basement Backup Occurrences Number of Complaints Average Daily Flow in MGD Peak Monthly Flow in MGD(if available) Peak Hourly Flow in MGD(if available) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS I 0.00 Lift Station Failures(failures/ps/year) I 0.00 Sewer Pipe Failures(pipe failures/sewer mile/yr) I 0.00 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (number/sewer mile/yr) I 0.06 Basement Backups(number/sewer mile) I 0.27 Complaints (number/sewer mile) 11.1 Peaking Factor Ratio (Peak Monthly:Annual Daily Average) I 0.0 Peaking Factor Ratio(Peak Hourly:Annual daily Average) Was infiltration/inflow(lIl) significant in your community last year? o Yes . No If Yes, please describe: I Page 26 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 6/16/2006 Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems (Continued) Has infiltration/inflow and resultant high flows affected performance or created problems in your collection system, lift stations, or treatment plant at any time in the past year? o Yes . No If Yes, please describe: I Explain any infiltration/inflow(I/I) changes this year from previous years? What is being done to address infiltrationlinflow in your collection system? Inspections, cleaning, televising, repairs and replacement. Total Points Generated mil.. Score (100 - Total Points Generated) IIi.. Section Grade _ Page 27 of 29 COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 WPDES NO.0025038 Notes: A = Voluntary Range B = Voluntary Range C = Recommendation Range (Response Required) D = Action Range (Response Required) F = Action Range (Response Required) COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT Facility Name: Oshkosh Wastewater Treatment Facility Last Updated: Reporting Year: 2005 Resolution or Owner's Statement