HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.10.2025 APB Agenda Packet
OSHKOSH ADVISORY PARKS BOARD AGENDA
ROOM 404 (4TH FLOOR), CITY HALL
OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN
March 10, 2025
6:00 p.m.
If anyone requires reasonable ADA accommodations, please contact the Parks Department atemaertz@oshkoshwi.gov, or phone 920-236-5080.
A.CALL TO ORDER (6:00 PM)
B.ROLL CALL
C.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.February 10, 2025 Meeting Minutes
D.CITIZEN STATEMENTS (Items not listed on this agenda)
(Statements are limited to five (5) minutes; they must address items that are not listed on the meeting agenda, are limited to
issues that have an impact on the City of Oshkosh and the Advisory Parks Board may address at a future meeting, and must
not include endorsements of any candidates or other electioneering. If you require more time please inform the Chair at the
beginning of your presentation.)
E.OLD BUSINESS
F.NEW BUSINESS
2.Discuss and reccomend relocating July 4th fireworks launch site from Miller's Bay/Monkey Island
to Ames Point in Menominee Park
3.Review and recommend Pickart Park Master Plan for approval
G.STAFF REPORTS
Park Director (Maurer)
Update on Menominee Park amusement train operations
Update on Quarry Park Master Plan development
Update on parkland dedication and fee in lieu of parkland dedication revisions
H.OTHER BUSINESS
I.ADJOURNMENT
NEXT MEETING DATE: April 14, 2025
TO:TO:Advisory Parks Board
FROM:FROM:Ray Maurer, Parks Director
DATE:DATE:March 10, 2025
SUBJECT:SUBJECT:February 10, 2025 Meeting Minutes
AttachmentsAttachments
February 10, 2025 Minutes
ADVISORY PARK BOARD
February 10, 2025
Present: Amy Davis, Becky Metz, Lester Millette, Jacob Floam, Steve Herman
Excused: Timothy Franz, Devon Hudak
Staff: Chad Dallman, Assistant Parks Director; Travis Derks, Landscape Operations
Manager; Ericka Maertz, Administrative Assistant; Anne Schaefer, Marketing
and Fund Development Coordinator
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Chair Davis called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. A quorum was determined to be present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Floam for approval of the October 10, 2024 minutes. Seconded by Millette.
Motion carried 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS
1) UPDATE ON MENOMINEE PARK AMUSEMENT AREA OPERATIONS
Mr. Dallman shared that, with the recent media reports of the discontinuation of the
amusement area, the public has expressed an interest in the continuation of the
amusement area. Common Council approved a budget amendment that will be utilized to
begin to make the necessary repairs and improvements to the amusement ride area to
allow for operations in 2025. Seasonal employment positions have been posted for
advertisement and staff is working to create a comprehensive budget to include staff
wages, annual maintenance and repairs.
Mr. Floam requested that department staff further update the Board with any appropriate
information pertaining to a working relationship with a nonprofit, 501c3, friend groups,
etc., pertaining to future operations, as it becomes relevant.
Mr. Herman clarified that the aquatic equipment will also be operational during the
operational season alongside the train which Mr. Dallman confirmed.
2) DISCUSS AND RECOMMEND AMENDMENT TO SECTION 17-29 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE, SPEED LIMITS FOR BOATS, PROHIBITING WATER SKIING,
WAKEBOARDING, AQUAPLANING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITIES IN THE FOX RIVER
IN OSHKOSH
AVISORY PARK BOARD MINUTES PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 10, 2025
Mr. Dallman shared that prior to the September 2024 meeting, the Parks Department has a
request from the Riverwatch Condominium Association Board of Directors to extend the
slow no wake zone in the Fox River. After hearing comments from both supporters and
opposition to the no wake extension, the directive from the board was to have staff
explore an ordinance prohibiting water sports instead.
Parks Department staff has worked with the City Attorney's office and the DNR on
verbiage to amend Section 17-29 of the Municipal Code, Speed Limits for Boats, to prohibit
water skiing, wakeboarding, aquaplaning or similar activities in the Fox River in Oshkosh.
Mr. Dallman clarified for those in attendance that there are no proposed changes to the
speed limit or wake zones within the proposed amendment.
Motion by Millette for recommendation of amendment to Section 17-29 of Municipal Code to
Common Council. Seconded by Metz. Motion carried 5-0.
3) PRESENTATION BY ANNE SCHAEFER, MARKETING AND FUND DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATOR, ON UPCOMING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE PROGRAMS
INCLUDING THE RECENT MENOMINEE PARK ARCHAEOLOGICAL WORK
Ms. Schaefer shared that though a partnership with the Friend of the Oshkosh Senior
Center, the City of Oshkosh received a Wisconsin Arts Board Grant which will be used to
PROVIDE Native American Culture programs including the recent Menominee Park
archaeological work.
With the help of the Oshkosh Public Museum, funding from the grant will be used to offer
a series of workshops, lectures, and informational opportunities to help others better
understand the region's indigenous communities. The kick off to this series is a free public
event on Sunday, February 23rd at 2pm at the Oshkosh Convention Center where the
recent Menominee Park archaeological work will be covered by neighboring Tribal
Nations and archaeological professionals.
4) DISCUSS AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE POLLOCK COMMUNITY
WATER PARK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AND OSHKOSH
AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR 2025-2026
Mr. Dallman shared that this is a standard agreement between the City of Oshkosh and
the Oshkosh Areas School District (OASD) that has been in place since 2006 in retaining
life guard services from the Oshkosh Recreation Department.
There were no changed to this agreement outside of the wage matrix.
Motion by Davis for recommendation of the 2025-2026 Pollock Community Water Park
Agreement to Common Council. Seconded by Floam. Motion carried 5-0.
AVISORY PARK BOARD MINUTES PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 10, 2025
STAFF REPORTS
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (Dallman)
Mr. Dallman shared that ice skating at the Menominee Park Zoo lagoon has been open 9
dates and has seen approximately 700 participants. During our weekend hours, the
Oshkosh Recreation Department runs a warming shelter and Dr. Eric offers skate
programs.
Mr. Dallman deferred to Ms. Schaefer to offer additional information about the
development of a new Program and Sponsorship Guide that she worked with Jenny
McCollian, Revenue Facilities Manager, to create. The goal in creating this guide was to
show community partners a complete collection of what we offer and why they should
invest in the continuation and growth of these programs. Opportunities range from
monetary donations to in kind and volunteer opportunities.
LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS MANAGER (Derks)
Mr. Derks shared that staff is working their way though the annual tree pruning
operations and have already completed all of the smaller trees accessible from the ground.
They are now working to follow up with larger operations using the bucket truck.
Winter conditions have been very favorable for using heavier equipment within the parks
to manage invasive species without causing damage. This includes mowing buckthorn in
Abbey Park, Lakeshore Park, Red Arrow Park and Akan Acres (North High
Conservancy), fence line trimming in Stevens Park and South Park, and overall low
clearance branch pruning in all of the parks.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Davis for adjournment; seconded by Floam. Motion carried 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 6:35 P.M
Respectfully submitted,
Ericka Maertz
Administrative Assistant
TO:TO:Advisory Parks Board
FROM:FROM:Ray Maurer, Parks Director
DATE:DATE:March 10, 2025
SUBJECT:SUBJECT:Discuss and reccomend relocating July 4th fireworks launch site from Miller's Bay/Monkey
Island to Ames Point in Menominee Park
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND
The Board will consider relocating the July 4th fireworks launch site from Miller's Bay/Monkey Island to
Ames Point in Menominee Park. Staff is recommending this relocation. The fireworks contractor that has
provided the July 4th fireworks show for nearly the past 20 years is no longer providing shows in this area of
the state. In working to secure a new contractor, relocation of the launch site was suggested by the new
contractor and is supported by Parks Department and public safety staff. Firing the shells from Monkey
Island was labor intensive for Parks Department staff as well as the contractor. Parks staff were required
to trim the shrubbery on the island at least annually to prevent fire potential. The contractor was required
to load all their equipment and product onto a barge to haul it to the island for the show as well as
removal of these items on the barge following the show. This required approximately 3 days for the set up
for the show by the contractor and it is estimated it took them about 500 hours. Additionally, at times
boat traffic in the bay was getting too close to the launch site.
Moving the show to Ames Point would eliminate the expense incurred by the contractor allowing for more
funds to actually go into the fireworks products/show. It would also eliminate the need for Parks
Department staff to trim the shrubbery on the island. In meeting with public safety staff from the Oshkosh
Fire Department, Oshkosh Police Department and Winnebago County Sheriff's Department, the Ames
Point location was favored over Monkey Island. Keeping boaters and people on land at a safe distance
from the launch site is easier to coordinate from Ames Point.
Staff recommends the Ames Point location for the July 4th fireworks show.
TO:TO:Advisory Parks Board
FROM:FROM:Ray Maurer, Parks Director
DATE:DATE:March 10, 2025
SUBJECT:SUBJECT:Review and recommend Pickart Park Master Plan for approval
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND
Rettler Corporation has completed a Pickart Park Master Plan based on the input received from public
input meetings and meetings with Parks Department staff. Your packet includes a copy of this plan.
Pickart Park is a 1.51-acre park dedicated to the city as part of the Pickart Estates Subdivision
development on W. 9th Avenue, just east of Clairville Road. Rettler Corporation staff will be at the
meeting to present the plan and answer any questions. Staff is looking for a recommendation from the
Board to the Plan Commission and Common Council to approve the Master Plan.
AttachmentsAttachments
Pickart Park Master Plan
Pickart Park Master Plan
March 2025
Project No. 23.049Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Prepared for:
City of Oshkosh Parks Department
805 Witzel Avenue
Oshkosh, WI 54902
Prepared by:
Rettler Corporation
3317 Business Park Drive
Stevens Point, WI 54482
March 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Master Plan
1.0 Acknowledgements ............................................................................ 1
2.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 2
3.0 Site Analysis ....................................................................................... 3
4.0 Needs Assessment ............................................................................. 5
5.0 Master Plan Development .................................................................. 6
6.0 Cost Overview .................................................................................. 10
7.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................ 11
8.0 References ....................................................................................... 12
Appendix
A. Detailed Cost Estimate
B. Meeting Notes
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 1
1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following persons provided critical input, support, and critique in the development of this
document. The City of Oshkosh and Rettler Corporation wish to thank the following people for
their time and assistance in developing this plan.
City of Oshkosh City Council:
Matt Mugerauer, Mayor
Karl Buelow, Deputy Mayor
Paul Esslinger, Council Member
Jacob Floam, Council Member
Kris Larson, Council Member
DJ Nichols, Council Member
Joseph Stephenson, Council Member
City of Oshkosh Advisory Park Board:
Tim Franz, Seat 1
Becky Metz, Seat 2
Lester Millette, Seat 3
Amy Davis, Seat 4
Jacob Floam, Council Rep.
Devon Hudak, Alternate 1
Steven Herman, Alternate 2
City of Oshkosh Staff:
Ray Maurer, Parks Director
Chad Dallman, Assistant Parks Director
Travis Derks, Landscape Operations Manager/City Forester
Jenny McCollian, Revenue Facilities Manager
Erica Maertz, Administrative Assistant
Rettler Corporation:
John Kneer, ASLA, PLA, President
Rebecca Ramirez, PLA
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION
In 1912, John and Mary Pickart purchased an eighty-acre dairy farm west of Oshkosh.
In 2018 their descendants, Paul Pickart and his siblings, began the process of creating the Pickart
Estates subdivision on the property.
In keeping with the City of Oshkosh municipal code regarding subdivisions, the family dedicated
1.51 acres to the City for a neighborhood park.
In 2022 a request was made from the Pickart family and approved by City of Oshkosh to name
the parcel of land, Pickart Park.
In 2024 the City partnered with Rettler Corporation, a Stevens Point based landscape
architecture, engineering, and design firm to create the following Pickart Park Master Plan.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 3
3.0 SITE ANALYSIS
Pickart Park is situated in the Pickart Estates
subdivision, on the far west side of Oshkosh,
south of the Fox River and just north of W 9th Ave.
Parcel #: 90665020104
Size: 1.51 acres
Address: Mary’s Dr, Oshkosh WI
The site is mowed and generally level, with only a
two-foot difference in elevation across the
property. The lowest point is in the top center,
where an inlet has already been placed and
connected to storm sewer pipe. The highest
points are at the west end and the south end.
Slopes are gentle, in the 1%-2% range.
Access can be either by car, with parking along
the street, or by foot utilizing the subdivision
sidewalks and road crossings. While the site does
not yet (as of the time of survey) have sidewalks
along its street-facing perimeters, it did have curb
and newly planted trees. The developer plans to
install sidewalks in the near future.
Other utilities include water, sanitary, and storm
connections at the northern side of the western
end. Electric, gas, fiber, and water come in at the
far east side of the site. Two solar powered light
poles have been placed along the northern
boundary.
While two of the parcel edges border the street,
the other two sides are adjacent to current or
future residential properties.
According to the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources Surface Water Data Viewer,
there are no wetlands on the site, however some
areas are designated with wetland indicator
hatches. A wetland delineation may be required
before construction.
According to the United States Department of
Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation
Service Web Soil Survey, the site is composed of
Kewaunee silt loam, 2-6 percent slopes, eroded.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 5
4.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Two community input meetings were
held with the neighborhood residents to
listen to thoughts, concerns, and desires
for the space.
The first was held on April 30, 2024. A
sign in sheet indicates that roughly
twenty people attended. After a brief
PowerPoint presentation, a question-
and-answer and brainstorming session
was held, fielded by the consultant, the
Oshkosh Parks Director, and the
Assistant Parks Director.
At the end, the group was in agreement
that a playground, paths, some sort of
shelter, seating, green space, trees, bag
toss or some type of game for adults, and
park lighting were the main priorities. Multiuse courts should also be planned for.
After the first meeting, two concept plans containing the items listed above in different orientations
were developed by the consultant. Rough cost estimates were also developed. These options
were presented at a second input meeting on September 25, 2024.
At this meeting, the group was unanimous in their decision that Concept 2, with some
modifications, should become the base for the Master Plan. The Oshkosh Parks Department staff
suggested some revisions as well.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 6
5.0 MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT 1
In this concept, a tennis/pickleball multiuse court dominates the high ground at western end of
the park. Not far away, a rubberized surfaced playground with plaza and cantilever shade
structure over some seats shares the same asphalt entry path. A drinking fountain is located
nearby at the intersection of the north entry and the future sidewalks.
The center of the park is mostly green space, perfect for impromptu games and running off energy.
The main entrance is located at the northeast corner, along with bike racks, a landscaped park
sign, and concrete bag toss equipment.
Both activity areas are lit with internal park lighting and connected by an eight-foot-wide
accessible asphalt path. Landscape buffers have been placed along all sides of the park that
border residential properties.
CONCEPT 2
In this concept, there is no main entry. Instead, there are three entries connected by concrete
sidewalk loops. And once again, all residential facing sides have been provided with a landscape
buffer to assist with mitigating activity and noise.
A basketball court has been placed on the west end, with a large central green space adjoining
for spontaneous play and running around. The rubberized surface playground has been located
in the center of the park along a wide entry sidewalk. Across the walk from the playground is an
open shelter with picnic tables from which parents can watch activities taking place on either side.
A drinking fountain has been placed at the corner of this entry.
A third entry is sited on the eastern side of the park next to bike racks and concrete bag toss
equipment.
Also in the works is a discussion on rentable game equipment and lockers.
MASTER PLAN
Based on Concept 2, the Master Plan contains a multiuse tennis/pickleball court and a half
basketball court on either side of the westernmost entry.
An open shelter with seating and a drinking fountain are located on the west side of the central
entry, and a poured-in-place rubberized surface playground to the east.
The easternmost entrance leads to bike racks, seating, and concrete bag toss. A park sign is
located on the northeastern corner.
Smaller open green space areas are situated between each of the entries.
Construction will likely be phased, as funds allow, with the playground and eastern loop taking
priority.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 10
6.0 COST OVERVIEW
The following site development cost ranges have been derived from 2024 actual project
construction costs. Redevelopment may be by phased development; therefore, the total cost
should be evaluated by both individual elements and their phasing potential.
Earthwork and Demolition $183,870
Utilities $141,800
Walks (concrete) $62,800
Playground $274,070
Bag Toss $16,650
Multiuse Court $88,550
Basketball (half court) $39,320
Buildings and Miscellaneous Amenities $247,900
Construction Items Total $1,054,960
Contingency (at 10%) $105,500
Construction Estimate Subtotal $1,160,460
Geotechnical Borings $5,000
Project Soft Costs $98,640
Summary- Project Total $1,264,100
(See Appendix A for detailed cost estimate line items)
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 11
7.0 CONCLUSION
Pickart Park is an important resource to the surrounding neighborhood and community, as well
as an enduring memorial to the Pickart Family legacy.
An early stage in construction- the park site being essentially a blank slate- and enthusiastic local
interest combine to make this a unique opportunity to construct something tailor-made to the
community.
We believe that implementing the ideas outlined in this document will assist in ensuring and
maintaining Pickart Park’s importance in this neighborhood and the City of Oshkosh.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan P a g e | 12
8.0 REFERENCES
▪ City of Oshkosh. Information about parks, boards and committees, and GIS information.
Retrieved from URL:
o https://www.oshkoshwi.gov/
https://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=1081941&dbid=0&repo
=Laserfiche
▪ Oshkosh Parks Department. Ray Maurer, Parks Director, and other department staff and
members, provided important information regarding the current needs and
recommendations for the City of Oshkosh.
▪ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey.
o https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
▪ Winnebago County Wisconsin. Mapping and GIS information. Retrieved from URL:
o https://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/planning-and-zoning/gis
o https://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/planning-and-zoning/gis/data-download
▪ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Surface Water Data Viewer. Retrieved
from URL:
o https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/SurfaceWater/swdv
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan
APPENDIX
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan
Appendix A
Detailed Cost Estimate
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Pickart Park Master Plan - Preferred Concept
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Park Facility Development - Master Plan
Rettler Project No.: 23.049
Item Estimated Category
No.Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extension Sub Total
$183,870.00
1.Mobilization L.S.1 $82,000.00 $82,000.00
2.Common Excavation, 12-inch depth C.Y.2,445 $10.00 $24,450.00
3.Strip Topsoil, 6-inch depth S.Y.7,340 $2.50 $18,350.00
4.Place Screened Topsoil, 6-inch depth S.Y.4,892 $3.00 $14,680.00
5.Excavation below Subgrade Allowance C.Y.690 $23.00 $15,870.00
6.Seed/Fertilize/Mulch Common Green Space S.F.44,030 $0.50 $22,020.00
7.Erosion Control L.S.1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
8.Tracking Pad EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
$141,800.00
9.Stormwater Management Allowance L.S.1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
10.Storm Sewer L.F.500 $55.00 $27,500.00
11.Storm Basin EACH 4 $3,000.00 $12,000.00
12.Site Electrical & Service Allowance L.S.1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
13.Sanitary Utility Allowance L.F.210 $65.00 $13,650.00
14.Water Utility Allowance L.F.210 $65.00 $13,650.00
WALKS (CONCRETE)$62,800.00
15.Concrete, 5-inch depth (inc. viewing area)S.F.7,993 $7.00 $55,960.00
16.Dense Graded Base, 6-inch depth S.Y.977 $7.00 $6,840.00
PLAYGROUND $274,070.00
17.Play Equipment Allowance L.S.1 $175,000.00 $175,000.00
18.PIP Surface S.F.3,115 $22.00 $68,530.00
19.4" Underdrain L.F.200 $20.00 $4,000.00
20.Concrete Thickened Edge Walk, 5-inch depth S.F.693 $12.00 $8,320.00
21.Dense Graded Base, 6-inch depth (walk)S.Y.85 $7.00 $600.00
22.Concrete, 5-inch depth (playground plaza)S.F.1,370 $12.00 $16,440.00
23.Dense Graded Base Course, 6-inch depth (playground plaza)S.Y.167 $7.00 $1,180.00
BAG TOSS $16,650.00
24.Precast Concrete Bag Toss Boards SET 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00
25.Concrete, 5-inch depth (inc. viewing area)S.F.463 $7.00 $3,250.00
26.Dense Graded Base, 6-inch depth S.Y.57 $7.00 $400.00
27.Rental Kiosk/Sports Equipment Smart Locker L.S.1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00
MULTIUSE COURT $88,550.00
28.Hot Mixed Asphalt, 3.5-inch depth S.Y.847 $25.00 $21,180.00
November 7, 2024
EARTHWORK / DEMOLITION
UTILITIES
29.Dense Graded Base, 12-inch depth S.Y.932 $12.00 $11,190.00
30.Acrylic Surfacing and Striping S.Y.847 $20.00 $16,940.00
31.Sawcut Joints L.S.1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
32.Tennis Court Netting (Posts, Net, Center Anchor Strap)SET 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
33.10' Vinyl Coated Chain Link Fencing L.F.210 $75.00 $15,750.00
34.3.5' Vinyl Coated Chain Link Fencing L.F.140 $30.00 $4,200.00
35.10'H x 12'W Vinyl Coated Gate EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
36.4" Underdrain L.F.372 $20.00 $7,440.00
37.6"HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe and Endwall L.F.145 $30.00 $4,350.00
BASKETBALL (HALF COURT) $39,320.00
38.Hot Mixed Asphalt, 3.5-inch depth S.Y.233 $25.00 $5,825.00
39.Dense Graded Base, 12-inch depth S.Y.256 $12.00 $3,075.60
40.Acrylic Surfacing and Striping S.Y.233 $20.00 $4,660.00
41.Sawcut Joints L.S.1 $500.00 $500.00
42.Post Mounted Basketball Hoop EACH 2 $9,000.00 $18,000.00
43.10' High Black Vinyl Chain Link Fencing L.F.50 $75.00 $3,750.00
44.4" Underdrain L.F.100 $20.00 $2,000.00
45.6"HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe L.F.50 $30.00 $1,500.00
BUILDINGS AND MISCELLANEOUS AMENITIES $247,900.00
46.Benches EACH 2 $800.00 $1,600.00
47.Stone Seat Wall F.F.48 $100.00 $4,800.00
48.Open Shelter (20x34')S.F.680 $250.00 $170,000.00
49.Site Furniture Allowance L.S.1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00
50.Drinking Fountain EACH 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
51.Bicycle Racks EACH 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
52.Park Lighting EACH 3 $5,500.00 $16,500.00
53.Park Sign L.S.1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
54.Landscaping Allowance L.S.1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
SUMMARY
CONSTRUCTION ITEMS TOTAL:$1,054,960.00
CONTINGENCY at 10%:$105,500.00
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL:$1,160,460.00
GEOTECHNICAL BORINGS $5,000.00
PROJECT SOFT COSTS $98,640.00
SUMMARY - PROJECT TOTAL $1,264,100.00
Notes:
Geotechnical study not completed at time of study. Soil conditions may impact cost estimate.
City of Oshkosh
Pickart Park Master Plan
Appendix B
Meeting Notes
Listening Session Meeting Minutes
Client: City of Oshkosh
Name of Project: CORP update
RHR Project No.: 23.049
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2024
Time: 4:30pm
Location: Parks Dept Bldg
No. Name Company Email/Phone
1. Ray Maurer Parks Director RMaurer@oshkoshwi.gov
2. John Kneer (consultant) Rettler Corporation jkneer@rettler.com
3. Rebecca Ramirez (consultant) Rettler Corporation rramirez@rettler.com
4. Chad Dallman Assistant Parks
Director CDallman@oshkoshwi.gov
5. Twenty-one community members
I. Introductions
▪ The Parks Director introduced the master planning process using Rusch Park as an
example.
▪ John Kneer then introduced Rettler Corporation and went through the PowerPoint
presentation. He further went into more detail on the Master Planning process. He then
opened the floor to comments.
II. Public Input and Discussions
▪ Input: Can you give a size example of the sort of playground that cost on the
presentation would install? Answer: The Parks Director listed 44th Parallel Park (going in
now), Roe Park (constructed last year), and Westhaven Park as similar examples. The
cost includes metal equipment and accessible poured-in-place surfacing. PIP surfacing
also saves a lot of maintenance.
▪ Input: Will there be sidewalks in Pickart Park? Answer: unsure at this time. The
consultant stated that designers use paths to promote movement through the park. The
Assistant Parks Director did note that the trees planted were located with a possible
exterior sidewalk in mind.
▪ The Parks Director outlined the playground purchase process. The city sends an RFP
out 6-8 playground vendors, asking each to submit up to three proposals. Park staff
reviews these, and then the neighborhood picks their favorites.
▪ Input: Are tennis courts so expensive because concrete and asphalt are expensive?
Answer: Yes, material costs are high. Kneer said park development can be phased.
▪ Input: Does the tennis court on the side include lights? Answer: No.
▪ Input: Question about trash cans in parks. The Parks Director stated that since 1999,
the city has gone to a “take out what you bring in,” like the state parks. The city
generally does not provide trash cans. Trash cans are a nice convenience, but people
abuse it. People even drop off boats in the parks.
▪ Input: Does the city pick up pet waste or provide pet waste stations? Or does this fall
under the same policy as above? Yes, it does. Bring your bags and carry out your dog’s
waste.
▪ Input: We live across from the park and my kids make us go to Jones Park because of
zip lines. Jones Park has a zip line, small playground, and natural environment.
▪ The Parks Director stated that if the neighborhood wants to see some specific amenity
(such as a zip line), to please let the parks department know so they can include it in the
proposal.
▪ Input: What about horseshoes? They aren’t very expensive.
▪ John Kneer stated that bag toss and table tennis are also getting popular. The Parks
Director stated that Oshkosh does have a few of those items, however they do not
seem to be highly used.
▪ A discussion followed on bag toss rental with equipment that can be unlocked via
phone. Boards are concrete so that they cannot be taken.
▪ Input: Can you add basketball hoops to a pickleball court so that you can get half-court
basketball as well? The consultant then talked about multiuse courts and their usage in
Appleton. He stated they are becoming more common.
▪ Input: A question was raised about how many items and of what size can actually fit in
this park space. Kneer roughed in a tennis site based on the scale shown on the survey
currently up on the slide. A multiuse court would take up quite a lot of the park.
▪ Input: What about boundary fencing to protect neighbors immediately next to the park?
A discussion of fencing started (i.e. wooden, etc.)
▪ Input: One person stated that they are looking for an exterior perimeter walking path for
strollers and ADA access.
▪ Kneer stated that the meeting is narrowing in on a main entrance at the northeast
corner.
▪ Input: Question on whether street parking would be required. Answer: Given the
neighborhood character of the park, and the size and cost of a parking lot, probably not.
It will leave more money to spend on amenities.
▪ Everyone agreed that a playground was a priority.
▪ Input: Green space is also a priority.
▪ Input: Suggested a basketball court.
▪ Input: Want to see an inclusive playground with something for different age groups that
“grows with the kids.” Would also like to see a basketball court for older kids.
▪ Input: Attendee states they never play in their back yard with their kids because of the
pond. The open field at Pickart Park is the safest space in the neighborhood to safely
play with young children.
▪ Input: Question about playground siting- would you have it near the entrance? Answer:
No. It would not be immediately near the entrance, but at one of the site high points
away from traffic and in a wider area.
▪ Input: Would like to see pickleball or something that adults can do. Want something
“adultish” in the park.
▪ Input: It’s great that this is in a recognized neighborhood association to help with
funding. Additional funding is available.
▪ Input: Would like a shade structure as well as trees and landscape.
▪ The Parks Director inquired if there was interest in a basic open-air shelter. The answer
was yes. Would like that along with landscaping.
▪ Input: Want a drinking fountain.
▪ The Parks Director stated he would check if sidewalks were going to be constructed
around Pickart as part of the subdivision or not.
▪ Input: Can we have internal paths that connect to sidewalks. It doesn’t have to be
concrete. Answer: Yes.
▪ Input: I am hearing that the neighborhood park should also be a gathering space.
▪ John Kneer asked what the residents would like. Answer: Shelter (about three quarters
raised their hands), playground (roughly half raised their hands), paths, and multiuse
courts later.
▪ The Parks Director said he would like to start the park this year and finish up by next
summer. There would be time to review options. He further warned that if pickleball is
constructed, it would attract noise and visitors from outside the neighborhood.
▪ The Parks Director asked about lighting. A positive response was received. The
consultant noted that bollard lighting can be laid out along the trail.
▪ Input: A question was raised about how to be respectful to those neighboring the park.
The consultant spoke of defining lot lines and buffers. The Parks Director said he would
mark the corners prominently to make sure the lot lines are clear.
▪ Input: Would like seating along the walkways. Benches of some sort.
▪ Input: Want open space, buffers, and to plant trees early to give them time to grow. And
also to leave some spots open.
▪ Input: Question about whether pickleball needs tall fencing. Answer: No. Only
competition courts. Some recreational courts only have backstops. The Parks Director
mentioned Stevens Park as an example.
III. Conclusions
▪ John Kneer with Rettler reviewed the next steps of master planning, collection of
community input, and stated it would be a few weeks before coming back to review.
▪ The Assistant Parks Director stated the department would try to get unique play items or
themes.
▪ Input: It was noted that the email address on the comment sheets differed from that in
the presentation. The consultant zoomed in on the presentation so people could write
down the new address. The Parks Director stated that both would work for the duration
of the input date.
Pickart Park Neighborhood Input Meeting Minutes
Client: City of Oshkosh
Name of Project: CORP update
RHR Project No.: 23.049
Date: Wednesday, Sept 25, 2024
Time: 6:00-7:00pm
Location: Oshkosh Parks Department
No. Name Company Email/Phone
1. Chad Dallman Assistant Parks
Director
2. John Kneer Rettler Corporation jkneer@rettler.com
3. Rebecca Ramirez Rettler Corporation rramirez@rettler.com
Four community members
I. Introductions
▪ John Kneer, with Rettler Corporation, introduced the company and then the recent
CORP approval and its connection to the Pickart Park Master Planning process.
▪ John Kneer presented Pickart Park Concept 1 and 2, then displayed both on the screen
side-by-side and invited questions and comments.
II. Questions and Discussions
▪ Input: Concept 1 does not show picnic tables? Answer: correct.
▪ Attendees expressed a preference for the larger shelter with tables in Concept 2.
▪ Attendees expressed a preference for the walking paths in Concept 2. They liked the
idea of loops.
▪ Attendees expressed a preference for the entrance location in Concept 2. They
preferred a non-corner entry.
▪ Attendees liked the greater green space in Concept 2.
▪ Attendees all agreed that they generally prefer Concept 2. Some mentioned liking its
simplicity.
▪ Input: A question about the amount of buffer space/room between the bean bags area
and the residence to the south was raised. Answer: about 30 feet. It was also noted by
another participant that Concept 2 had more room in that area too.
▪ Attendees were interested in a multiuse court with tennis, pickleball, and basketball on
the same court. Something larger than is currently shown in Concept 2.
▪ Discussion on water fountain location. It was agreed that the location near the
playground was good from both a utility and use perspective.
▪ Attendees like the shelter with tables being near- but not a part of the playground- as
shown on Concept 1 vs Concept 2. Then the shelter can be used for various purposes.
▪ Lighting questions were raised. Attendees want park lighting moved closer to events.
Athletic lighting for the multiuse courts (i.e. single pole Musco sports light) would be
nice. Especially something that can be programmed.
▪ The Assistant Parks Director asked about restrooms. Neighbors considered, but
ultimately decided they would like to keep much of the park usage local.
▪ The Assistant Parks Director asked about landscaping. The neighbors wished to get the
landscaping in soon so that it has time to grow. Attendees added it to priorities.
▪ Priorities are:
i. Playground
ii. Trails
iii. Landscaping
iv. Adult games
v. Pavilion
vi. Attendees agreed that they want the middle and east section of the Concept 2
concept done first. The multiuse courts and associated path/loop can be
completed later.
III. Next Steps
▪ John asked about further input and went into a brief description of the next steps.
i. Advisory Park Board will evaluate funding and cost estimates from Rettler
Corporation.
ii. After Park Board is satisfied, they will then adopt the plan.
▪ Attendees asked about start date, timing, and process.
▪ Question about whether the concept or master plan will be posted online after adoption.
▪ John Kneer also mentioned that the concepts and Advisory Park Board meeting packets
are available online.
▪ Question about showing up to meeting. The Assistant Parks Director said that would be
fine and show support.