HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.01.2024 MinutesCITY OF OSHKOSH SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
Minutes
July 1st 2024
SAB PRESENT: Margy Davey, Jacob Klaameyer, Alyssa Reinke, Vic Oliver, Brad Spanbauer,
EXCUSED: Lisa Marone, Joe Stephenson
ABSENT:
STAFF AND OTHERS: Emma Dziengeleski (Planning Staff), Travis Derks (Landscape
Operations Manager), Staff (Oshkosh Media)
I. Call to Order
Chair Margy Davey called the meeting to order at 6:00pm and a quorum was declared present.
II. Public Comment
Ms. Davey asked if there were public comments.
No public comments occurred.
III. Approval of Minutes, June 3rd, 2024
Ms. Reinke motioned to approve the minutes. Mr. Spanbauer seconded the motion.
The board approved the June 3rd minutes 5-0 (Reinke/Spanbauer).
IV. Tree Protection Zones
Ms. Davey introduced City Forester and Landscape Operations Manager, Travis Derks to the
group to help lead the discussion on tree protection zones.
Mr. Klaameyer kicked it off by asking how the city goes about tracking tree inventory and what
the current status of the inventory is.
Mr. Derks explained that after Elm Ash Borer hit the city, it has been rather difficult to track as
there has been some inconsistencies. He shared that there is somewhere between 10,000-11,000
trees. He also explained that they had just recently applied for a grant to help assist with
completing an updated inventory.
Mr. Klaameyer stated that one of the board’s goals is to increase the number of native plantings.
So, he was wondering if awarded the grant funding, the tree inventory will track types of trees
and also the diversity of trees within the city.
Mr. Derks responded yes, and that it would include the size, health, location, etc.
Ms. Davey asked if there is any species that they are concentrating on getting more of.
Mr. Derks said that they are focusing on diversifying right now. He listed a number of different
species they have planting.
Mr. Spanbauer asked if they are focusing on species that will be better adapted to our warming
climate.
Mr. Derks said a little bit, but it is not one of the main criteria that is looked at when considering
tree species.
Mr. Klaameyer asked what challenges there is when increasing the diversity of trees.
Mr. Derks discussed the partnership between the city and the Oshkosh Area Community
Foundation to start Taking Root Two. He also explained that some challenges are finding trees
at nurseries, as well as trying to find residents that want trees in their terraces.
Ms. Davey asked how residents can let the Parks Department know they want a terrace tree.
Mr. Derks explained the process in a little more detail and discussed the process of planting
replacing trees. He also explained the annual plantings process, dealing with above and below
ground utilities, and the species limits.
Ms. Davey asked if the board could make a Facebook post informing residents to contact the
Parks Department if they would like a terrace tree.
There was some discussion amongst the board and Mr. Derks on what the best processes would
be for residents to reach out. Ultimately, it was decided an email with “Terrace Tree Planting”
as the subject, was a good place to start.
Mr. Klaameyer asked if there was any way to mandate native trees versus nonnative trees.
Mr. Derks responded with the fact that that could be rather limiting as there would only be a
small diversity of species and mandating them may not be the best way to go planting more
native trees.
Mr. Klaameyer also asked if fruiting trees have ever been considered, or if that is a criterion
when choosing a species for a given area.
Mr. Derks said that they have definitely been considered. He did clarify that when selecting
trees for the terraces you do have to consider the proximity to the street you are as well as
possibly plugging up the storm sewers. He did mention that in a park setting it could be
different and easier to consider; however, you have to take into account the turf maintenance.
Mr. Klaameyer then explained to Mr. Derks the board’s interest in tree protection zones. He
explained that they had worked with University of Oshkosh students who had done a number
of projects on different recommendations to consider. One particular group focused in on tree
protection zones which is an ordinance that can be written to protect trees during construction
or road maintenance and that many other cities have implemented. Mr. Klaameyer explained
that the student project outlined that the city should update their code to include some of the
recommended methods.
Mr. Derks agreed to the request and shared an example of the most recent road reconstruction
on Waugoo Avenue. He shared that he walked the street with the engineers and they came to
the conclusion of what trees as well as how many were worth saving. He explained that the
contractor then came through and cut all of them down anyway.
There was discussion regarding why this happened, possible penalties, and what the
procedures are when street reconstructions are occurring.
Mr. Derks explained that a possible better goal the board, and the city, could work on for the
trees would not necessarily be to replant every tree, but to start looking at ways to replenish the
soil as throughout the whole city the soil is poor quality.
Mr. Klaameyer shared that in the project they explained that in the dripline the tree would be
properly marked, so that nothing could happen within that zone. He asked if Mr. Derks thought
that would’ve prevented the situation on Waugoo Avenue.
Mr. Derks shared that he thinks it would’ve been a good start, but cones and caution tape only
help so much. He also explained that this would be a tough thing to accomplish when doing
street reconstruction because there are many other things to consider like putting curbs in,
water and sewer lines, etc. He clarified that he could see it being feasible, but that focusing more
on the soil and doing future replanting correctly, will better regrow the canopy and set the city
up for future success.
There was some follow up discussion amongst the group on possible next steps.
V. Native Landscaping Areas Ordinance Review
Ms. Dziengeleski pulled up the Native Landscaping Areas Ordinance for all to review, and
explained that since questions had gotten brought up in June’s meeting, she thought maybe the
board would like to further discuss and review the ordinance.
Ms. Davey reminded the board of when this process all started, and also asked about how
someone goes about getting their native landscaping areas reviewed/approved.
Ms. Dziengeleski said that the Director of Parks or designee gives the final review and
approval.
Mr. Klaameyer raised concern about the ordinance calling out the transition period not being
longer than a three-year growing season as that is a rather tough goal for residents to achieve.
He asked if any board members remember why that is called out.
There was discussion amongst the board on clarifying what the ordinance says and how it is
currently being interpreted. They also discussed how and when issues arise for a resident that
other may portray those areas as long and noxious weeds and report them. The board then
discussed how they could better go about addressing concerns and possibly clarifying some
parts of the ordinance so that there is clearer interpretation.
VI. No Mow May
Ms. Dziengeleski let the board know some statisitics of No Mow May 2024. She started off by
sharing that there were 31 long grass complaints in the month of May that happened to be
registered No Mow May participants, so they did not receive any violation notices. She then
shared that in June there were 5 complaints that had happened to be registered participants,
and of that 5, one was not in violation at the time of inspection, one property had to be cut by
the Streets Department, and the remaining three properties mowed their lawns once they
received their notice.
She also shared that she went through all the registration years and looked for properties that
have registered for multiple years. She said that a total of 106 properties have been participating
from 2022-2024, and between the 2023-2024 the city had a total of 123 registered participants.
Ms. Davey concluded with next year looking at participating in Low Mow May versus No Mow
May, and those are discussions the board can start having late 2024 into early 2025.
VII. Energy Innovation Grant (EIGP)
Ms. Dziengeleski shared that the RFQ has been put out and will need to stay open for 30 days.
Simultaneously, there were requirements of staff to get some preliminary data and questions
answered and sent back to the Office of Energy Innovation before the awarded grant contract is
in place.
She also shared that WLGCC, which the City of Oshkosh is apart of, was also awarded grant
funding, and they are also waiting to hear back from the Office of Energy Innovation. She said
that staff is still waiting to see how the two projects will overlap with each other.
VII. City of Oshkosh American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
Ms. Davey shared that she had received notification that the board’s application was not
recommended for approval for ARPA funding. She left the board know that she reached out to
a couple of Common Council members who said they were working hard to not award funds to
government entities in which the board is.
Ms. Dziengeleski updated the board as City Manager Rohloff had informed staff that he
recognizes that an update to the Sustainability Plan is much needed, and he will find funding
this year to get the update completed. She shared that internally, staff was informed to start
getting the ball rolling.
There was further discussion on staff’s ARPA update as well as the latest Common Council
meeting regarding the ARPA funds and the City’s newly adopted Strategic Plan.
IX. Summer Farmers Market
Ms. Davey shared that unfortunately the June 22nd Farmers Market date fell through. The next
date that the board had scheduled was July 13th. She asked if they would like to discuss other
dates to reschedule a later time since June 22nd did not happen.
There was discussion amongst the board on possible dates that would work best moving
forward.
X. Agenda Items for Future Meeting
Summer Farmers Market, Native Landscaping Areas (Workshop), Speaker for September’s
Meeting
Ms. Davey shared that the Conservation Voters will be having their biannual listening session
on July 18th from 6:30-8:00pm in the Community Room at the Oshkosh Food Co-op.
XI. Next Meeting is Monday, September 5, 2024
XII. Adjourn
The board voted 5-0 to adjourn (Spanbauer/Oliver)
Recorded by:
Emma Dziengeleski, Assistant Planner