HomeMy WebLinkAboutRaw Water Intake-Cng Ord 7 CHANGE ORDER
CITY OF OSHKOSH, WI
CITY CONTRACT 02-01, RAW WATER INTAKE AND TRANSMISSION MAIN
Order No. 7
Date: September 29, 2003
Agreement Date: May 28, 2002
NAME OF PROJECT: City Contract 02-01, Raw Water Intake and Transmission Main
OWNER: City of Oshkosh
CONTRACTOR:
Lunda Construction Company
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
Contractor is hereby authorized to provide additional turbidity barrier as proposed in the April
16, 2003 letter from Lunda Construction Co. This additional turbidity barrier shall be provided at
the same cost as the turbidity barrier requested by the WDNR in its letter of February 4, 2003 and
as discussed with them at a meeting on the same day. Copies of these documents are attached
hereto.
All other conditions and requirements of the Contract Documents shall remain unchanged.
The following conditions are applicable to this Change Order:
Lunda Construction Company must execute this change order for an increase of $205,200 in
the Contract Price, as complete payment for this work. Payment will be made on a lump sum
basis for each of the three stages proposed by Lunda. The lump sum price shall include all
costs to furnish, install and maintain the turbidity barrier for the duration of the project.
Payment for satisfactory completion 0leach stage ;vill be made as follows:
For Stage 1: $82,080
For Stage 2:$82,080
For Stage 3:$41,040
Partial payments will be made based upon the estimated percentage of work completed in
each stage, as agreed to by the Resident Project Representative. This change order must be
processed before payment is made for any portion of this work.
9/29/2003 C07- 1
2. Prior to issuance of this change order, Lunda Construction Company must have a Project
Implementation Plan approved by the WDNR and the City of Oshkosh.
3. In the execution of the work, Lunda Construction Company must abide by all governing
permits. If Lunda's work is observed to be in violation of any permit requirements, Lunda
must, upon notification by the City's representative, immediately stop work until Lunda
corrects the violation. All costs to remedy such non-compliance shall be at Lunda's expense.
Reason for change: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has been
regularly monitoring construction on the lake for compliance with the Section 30 Permit for this
project. Based on its assessment of the effectiveness of the construction methods and means
being employed by the Contractor to control turbidity, the WDNR ordered that additional deep
water turbidity barrier be placed around designated construction areas in the lake. Extensive
discussions were held between the City, the WDNR, the Contractor and the Engineer to limit the
extent of the additional barrier to be provided.. The Contractor's cost proposal for this work was
reviewed by the Engineer and the Owner and found to be reasonable.
Change to CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: (See Note 1 below)
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by
previous CHANGE ORDER (See Note 2 below)
Total Increase in CONTRACT PRICE for this
CHANGE ORDER No. 7
$ 7,304,067.00
$ 7,375,419.89
$ 205,200.00
The CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 7,580,619.89
Chan~e to CONTRACT TIME:
The CONTRACT TIME will be not be changed by this CHANGE ORDER
The date for completion of all work remains unchanged.
NOTES:
Note 1: Adjustment made to correct Original Contract Price incorrectly shown on previous
change orders as $7,304,076.00
Note 2: Net total additions for Change Orders No.1 through 6 are $71,352.89
9/29/2003 CO7 - 2
APPROVALS
Recommended by (Engineer):
Accepted by (Contractor):
Date
Date
Recommended:
Director of Public ¢/orks
CITY OF OSHKOSH
City Manager ~
City Clerk /' tX
I certify that provision has been made to pay the liability that will accrue to the City of Oshkosh,
Wisconsin, under the within Change Order.
APPROVED
Comptroller
9/29/2003 CO7 - 3
2003. 3:33PM CiTY OF OSH~',OSH PUBLIC WOR~',S N0,0433
FAX COVER-SHEET
No. of pag~ including this sheet
Company:
Fax# 9~0- ~b- %o~
From:
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
W2332 E; Crosstown Road
P.O. Box 303
Hilbert, WI 54129
(920) 853-3522 Phone
(920) 853-7170 Fax
Comments _
, .Agr,18, 2003 3:33PM' CITY OF OSHKOSH PUBLIC WORKS No,0433 P, 2/5
ua/zo/uo ~3:.~o ~92u ~oo /zig LUI'~UA - EILBERT ~u02/005
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMpANy
620 GEBHARDT ROAD · P,O. BOX: 669
BLACK RIVER FALLS, WI 54615
Pi{: (715) 284-9491 FAx: {715) 284-9146
An £qual Empl~.yment Opp°r~ni~y Empl~yer · C~ns~rtlcllrtg $~fely
April ld, 2003
City of Oshkosh
Dave Patek, P.E.
Director of Public Works
P.O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130
Raw Watar Intake
Turbidity Bmr{er
Lunda .)'ob #g24~
Dear Dave:
Afterour neetin on4 14 ' = , . ·
· '. g ~ -03, I revmw¢d thu cun'en~ turbtd~ry baN~r feq'uh'¢mcnts by ~ho DNR. The
foHow~g is ~e quantity and ~sociat~ cost brcMcdown. I hav¢ cnclosed a rough sketch/howNg the
b ' '
mTzez- location.
Loch[ion
Tot~l l!!stimated
Barrier Required
Portion of Barrier in Contract Un/t Total
5'-0" Pku Water Depth Cost Cost
*North opening
of Millers Bay
1,000 L.F. 1,000 L.F.
$72.00/L:F. $72.00.00
Around intake
Operation
(1,000 L.F. fi-om
diversion vattk out
into lake)
2,400 L.F, 1,400 L.F.
$72.00/L,F. $100300.00
Diversion vmflt to
pretreatment basin
1,115 L.F, 450 LF. $72.00/L-F- $32,400.00
4,515 L.F. 2,850 L.F. $205,200.00
*Note: Thc barrier required it the '~otgh opening of Millera Bay is located where the water dsprh is
greater rh~m 5'-0" but would also be considered ~n extra to th/s project.
H~rbe~ office. W~32 g. Cfo~lown Rd. · RO. Box 303. ~i[be~ ~ 5412~ · Ph: [320) 853-3522 · f~, tn~m n~a.*,vn
· ' ~ ~iTY OF OSHKOSH PUSEIC WORKS No,0433 P. 3?5
',Apr,l~, 2003. 3:a3PM~2 o~o ,.,~ ~,~,~
u~,vo z~:~ - ~ILBERT ~u3/005
The foHo~Mg shows tm'bidky barrier quantlt~s and asSockted cost to comple~ely enclose the work
ZOne,
Loca~ioll
Toral Estimated
B artier Required
Portion of Ban-ier in Contract Unit Total
5'-0' Plus Water Depth Price Cost
~- lntakc Line
Divers/on vault to
preu'eatment basin
6,050 L.F. 5,025 E.F. $72.06/L.F. $361,800.f)0
J~LI5 L.F. 450 L,F. $72.00/L.F. $32,400.00
7,165 L.F. 5,475 L.F.
$394,200.00
~-Nom: Intake line maY be done in 2 phases. This reduces thc ttmount of barrier required from
6.050 L.F. to 4,250 L.F.. but increases the amount to install from 6~050 L.F, to 6,865 L.F.
It 'also hlcreases the 5,025 L.F. of ~ns:alla~ion in 5'-0" plus water depth to 5,840 L.F.
The benefits of installing turbidity bzazie,' m-ound the entire work zone are many, Ihave listed some
below.
1. It would be thc DNR's preferred method to contaia suspended sot/ds. The DNR has agreed
to the current minimum requirements as a means to reduce the over all quantity of turbidity
harrier required for this project. Bur the DNR has stared there remains the possibility of
rex/n/ring additional barrier in the hture. The DNR was tumble at this time m defhae what
specific conditions would require addldonal barrier other ~han a f£qh kill, bur would monitor
the work m~d respond as needed.
2. Lunda is ctm'ently working wir_h a th-ne frame of 5 to 6 weeks from the time tt~e turbidity
barrier/s order to the time 'it is installed for excavation/backfill work to proceed.. ShouOd the
project be delayed as a result of additional barrie~ requirement at no fault 0fLunda
Construction, the associated cos~ f~,om the de.lay and additional barrier could be substantJ~I.
There is a great deal of work to be done during the 2003 construction season. Any delay
could jeopardize completing the ~ioe installation during the 2003 season. Should ~ipe
installation work be l~oved into r~h~ 2004 constructioix season, the cost could well ~e in
excess of $700,000.00_
3. h~ containing the suspended sol/ds to a relat~vcly small area at thc work zone. The water
quality a~ the west shore, the beach area. the temporary 60" water line intake, the existing 36"
water intake, the existing 24" water intake, and the ia/ce in general would be much better.
In an effort to mitigate ongoing projec~ conflict, elhninate a potential projdct delay over bm:tier
requ/remcnts, and take advantage of the above benefi~ in enclosing the work zone. Lunda offers
enclose the work zone for the s~ume price of the current turbidity bander requirements by the DNP,
($205,200.00)
Apr. 6, 2003 3:34Pt~ CITY OF OSHKOSH PUBLIC
We have updated our 2003 h~nplemenmdon phn and will send it out today dh-ect ~o MWH, DNR, and
the ckT. I would aplSreciate a response a~ sooll ~s possible.
,If you have m~y questions please call.
Sincerely,
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Vice President of Engit~e~Sag
~AQ/mlp
PUBLIC,.~.,,.,.WORKS ~ZZL~R'~
Febmaly~ 10, 2003
M0nflfly P, ro~g~e~ ss and pl~a~,ng water intake project contract 02-01
Conductea: Feomary 4m z003
,attendees:
Dave Patek City of Oshkosh 920-236-5965
Steve Brand City of Oshkosh 920-232-5365
Metvin kiefer City of Oshkosh 920-236-5164
Bob Knudsen City Of Oshkosh 920-379-3494
Rogers DNR 920424-7885
M.W.H. 414-773-8904
Kevin Webber Lunda I 920-853-3522
Meeting connnenced at 9:10 AM
Kristy Rogers reviewed the DNR requirements for continuation of permit on the project. (See
attached) Work will not be allowed on the lake until June 1 2003 as far as excavation or disruption
of the bosom of the lake.
Ioe Quist indicated they would like to begin earlier, involving the pigging and cleaning of the
existing intake and also upon approval the construction of the new intake crib structure. Construction
of the structure would be done at the shoreline adjacent to the installed pier and would not involve
any excavating mad production of turbid water. K_risty approved those operations.
Further review of the DNR requirements continued. To avoid any tmbid water from entering Iviiller's
Ba~v a turbidity barrier would be required across the north access to the bay. At this point Joe Quist
indicated that they would like to use barrier the entire length of the project and Kristy indicated that
that ff this were done she would drop the requirement for the Miller's Bay north access barrier.
Next point addressed was ihe opening that would be allowed in the barrier. DNR requirement was 50'
h and
February 10, 2003
Page 2
Kristy next indicated that the DNR requiremem for discharge of 80 ppm must be adhered to at all
times for any water being discharged back to the lake from dredging, pumxping or other means
employed that causes discharge. Much discussion followed concerning ways and means. Joe Quist
i~xdicated he intended to use turbidity barrier for fl~e rest of the project-
Kristy Rogers also requested that the implementation plan be submitted prior to April l~t 2003 for
rexSew well before the commencement of work.
Respectfully,
Bob Knud~en
Ele~zrician /Elec. Tech
City of Oshkosh Water Filtration Plant
State of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Jim Doyle, Governor
Scott Hassett, Secretary
Ronald W. Kazmierczak, Regional Director
Oshkosh Service Center
625 CTY RD Y STE 700
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901
Telephone 920-424-3050
FAX 920-424-4404
February 4, 2003
Steve Brand
City ofOshkosh
P:O. Box 1130
Oshkosh, V¢I 54902
Subject: Season II Construction
Dear Mr. Brand:
On December 17, 2002, the City, Lunda Construction and the Department met to discuss elements of the
project implementation plan for Season II of the water intake and transmission construction. The City
presented the results of the Season I sampling and expressed their concerns with the placement of a
turbidity barrier along the entire route of the project. The Department has reviewed the submitted
sampling data: The following will be required fo[ Season II (Summer/Fall 2003).
·
1. Construction shall not commence until June/5,'-2003. No "in lake" work except for installation of
'the turbidity barrier shall be completed betweeh March 15 or "ice out" which ever is em:lief and June
15 of any year.
2. Turbidity barrier shal~ be insta~ed ar~und th~ ~perati~n unti~ the ~perati~n is greater than ~ ~ feet
out into the lake measured from the diversion vault. One overlapped opening no greater than 50 feet
wide may be created in the southern section of barrier. The barriers shall overlap a minimum of 25
feet.
Turbidity barrier shall be placed across the entire north opening of Millers Bay. An overlapped
opening no greater than 30 feet wide shall be created to allow navigation. The opening and
navigational channel shall be clearly marked..The barriers shall overlap a minimum of 25 feet.
The City shall submit a project implementation plan for Season II. It must contain a project schedule;
a detailed drawing and timeline of installation for the turbidity barriers; detailed plan for con[rolling
the discharge from the spoil barge including the measures to be used, monitoring plans and
maintenance plans. The p!an shall be submitted to the Department by April 1, 2003. Construction
shall not commence until the Department approves the plan in writing.
Ail other requirements of the permit are still in effect.
Please contact me at (920) 424-7885 with any questions.
Sincerely,
'lei-isty J. gbgers
Water M~afgement !Specialist
www.dnr.~tate.wi.us Quafity Natural Resources Management
www.wisconsin.gov Through Excellent Customer Service