HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.08.23 Landmarks Commission MinutesCITY OF OSHKOSH LANDMARKS COMMISSION
Minutes
November 8, 2023
PRESENT: Shirley Brabender Mattox, Kristopher Ulrich, Steve Cummings, Nikki Stoll Olthoff,
Paulette Feld, Sara Stichert, and Gerald Jacklin
ABSENT:
STAFF: Amy Fels, Museum Archivist and Karl Buelow, City Council Member
Meeting Minutes:
1) Call to Order
Meeting called to order by Shirley Brabender Mattox at 3:02pm. Ms. Brabender Mattox
welcomed the two members of the public in attendance, Jeff Davis and Joe Ferlo, to the
meeting. Mr. Davis and Mr. Ferlo introduced themselves to the Commission and their
purpose for attendance.
2) Approval of October 11, 2023 Meeting Minutes
Ms. Stoll Olthoff motioned to approve and was seconded by Mr. Cummings. The
minutes were unanimously approved.
3) Public Comment
a. Jeff Davis 584-586 N. Main Street Window Replacement Project
Mr. Davis presented he and his wife’s plan to renovate and revitalize their
recently purchased property at 584-586 N. Main Street into a recording studio
and retail space and two apartments. Mr. Davis’s primary concern for
attending this meeting was his intention to replace nine windows on the
second floor of the property that are either broken or are no longer sealed.
His intention is to match some of the other windows that have already been
replaced in the property. Ms. Brabender Mattox asked Mr. Davis if he was
applying for tax credits, and Mr. Davis stated that, if available, they would
like to. Ms. Brabender Mattox noted that, if that was his intention, window
replacements must be done according to SHPO restrictions and use
appropriate materials. Ms. Stoll Olthoff asked if Mr. Davis was set in his plan
to use vinyl window replacements, and Mr. Davis responded that he would
possibly be open to other options but that their current plan was the most
time and cost effective given that winter is quickly approaching. Mr.
Cummings asked what Mr. Davis’s intention for the building facades were,
and Mr. Davis stated that it was to clean up the brick and apply some fresh
paint since portions of it are original. Ms. Brabender Mattox noted that
having original photos of the exterior would be helpful in their efforts. Mr.
Ulrich cautioned Mr. Davis against getting involved in any mural projects too
soon, because doing it incorrectly could damage the longevity of the
building. Ms. Brabender Mattox asked about other structural projects they
intend to undertake on the property and noted that if the total cost comes to
$50,000, Mr. Davis would be eligible for historic tax credits if the work were
done in accordance to regulations. Mr. Davis asked if it would be possible to
replace the windows now, given the coming winter, and return to potentially
replace them with more historically appropriate materials later. Ms. Stoll
Olthoff replied in the affirmative, because the building has already been
altered and the Commission does not have the authority to prevent him from
doing so. Mr. Ulrich recommended not squaring off the originally arched
windows. Ms. Feld recommended reaching out to the owners of the property
on 6th and Main who did a recent renovation according to historical
guidelines for advice or recommendations. Mr. Davis and the Commission
seemed in agreement that having a short-term and long-term plan was a
satisfactory course of action. Mr. Davis then departed.
b. Grand Opera House Update from Joe Ferlo
Joe Ferlo provided an update to the Commission for the upcoming plans for
the Grand Opera House. The intended work will be done in the back corner
of the building to improve accessibility to the dressing rooms and backstage,
particularly for those who use wheelchairs. The work will also increase the
size of the dressing rooms and replaces the existing sewer line that runs to
the alley and avoid serious impending problems with the current restrooms.
The offices will also be moved. Mr. Ferlo stated that he will have drawings
and plans to present to the Commission early in the new year, but he did not
want to get through the City budget process without providing an update.
All of the projects are designed to address existing structural issues with the
building and provide a better operational model for the Grand. Catering prep
areas will be improved and improve functionality of the Grand lounge. Mr.
Ferlo stated that they intend to reuse original brick material into the new
addition. The Grand project is in the upcoming CIP budget for $3 million,
contingent upon the Grand being able to raise an additional $3 million, with
half a million of the city’s funding being released in January 2024 engage
architects and prepare a bid package. Mr. Ferlo stated it his intent to return to
the Commissioners in January or February 2024 to show them drawings. Mr.
Ulrich asked if they would be different from the drawings they had been
shown at an earlier date, and Mr. Ferlo said yes. The ground plan of the new
drawings would remain largely the same, but the finishes would be different
to fit the building better. Mr. Ulrich asked if any other historical elements of
the building would be changed, and Mr. Ferlo said no. Mr. Ulrich asked if the
new addition would extend into the current parking space, and Mr. Ferlo
said no, that the intention is to fit the new addition within the existing
footprint of the building. Mr. Jacklin how long the work might take and for
how much of that time the Grand would be closed. Mr. Ferlo said that, in
general, 2024 will be spent raising matching funds, that the plan will go to
bid in early 2025, and that they would break ground after the end of the
performance season sometime during the summer of 2025. The work is
anticipated to take anywhere from eight months to a year to complete, but
that there are plans to hold Grand programming elsewhere in the community
while work is happening. Ms. Brabender Mattox asked if Mr. Ferlo is
working with a local contractor, and Mr. Ferlo replied that the City is
requiring them to work with Tom Karrels, which Mr. Ferlo is supportive of.
Ms. Brabender Mattox asked if Mr. Ferlo had been in touch with SHPO. Mr.
Ferlo noted that SHPO communications will be coordinated by Grand staff
but will come from the City because the Grand is a municipally-owned
building. Mr. Cummings asked about the new catering prep area, and Mr.
Ferlo responded that it will not be anything too intensive or complex. The
intent is to provide caterers with efficient, ample space to prep food for
receptions or stage dinner events. Mr. Ferlo thanked the Commissioners for
their time and then departed.
4) Commissioner Statements
a. Oshkosh Herald articles - Topics related to Historic Preservation
Ms. Brabender Mattox shared her most recent article about old-growth
lumber versus new-growth lumber. Ms. Brabender Mattox said she wanted
to create an awareness among people who own older properties about value
and longevity of old-growth lumber. Ms. Brabender Mattox asked Ms. Stoll
Olthoff if there were a future article from what she learned about windows at
the state historic preservation conference, which Ms. Brabender Mattox, Ms.
Stoll Olthoff, and Mr. Jacklin all attended. Ms. Stoll Olthoff said yes there
could be. Mr. Jacklin stated his intended article for November is about why
Oshkosh’s historical structures and appearance are beneficial. Ms. Brabender
Mattox reminded the Commission that the hope for future topics is to remain
focused on things that are still currently in the City, buildings and sites. It
would be easy to write about buildings and industries that are gone, but that
does little to educate people about preserving the properties that remain. Mr.
Jacklin asked if it would be possible to post their articles to the Landmark’s
Facebook page. Fels stated that, as the City liaison, she has to be the person to
post content to the page, because the Landmarks Commission is a City entity.
Fels also noted that the article in its entirety could not be posted, because that
would violate the Herald’s copyright of the article, but that it may be possible
to post links to the article. Ms. Brabender Mattox then encouraged the
Commissioners to bring future article ideas to the next meeting.
b. Section 106 Review - Raulf Place, 530 N. Main
Ms. Brabender Mattox provided updated communications and plans from
the project consultant regarding antenna placements. The new proposal is
that the new antennas will be added to the penthouse tower of the building
to avoid adding anything further to the side of the primary building. US
Cellular has also agreed to paint their existing antennas a color that better
matches the building and will color match the new antennas as well. Ms. Feld
motioned to approve of Ms. Brabender Mattox contacting the consultant on
behalf of the Commission to express their approval of the updates. Mr.
Cummings seconded. The members of the Commission unanimously voted
in favor, with Councilor Buelow abstaining. The motion was carried.
c. Section 106 Review - Jackson Oregon Bridge Project - Park Plaza (City Center)
Ms. Brabender Mattox provided the Commissioners with a partial copy of the
project consultant’s report. Ms. Brabender Mattox pointed out that the
consultant does not consider the Park Plaza Mall to be potentially eligible for
historic register status due to significant alterations completed after 2001. Ms.
Brabender Mattox asked the Commissioners what direction they wanted to
go. Mr. Cummings asked what the goal of the Commission was in regards to
this item. Ms. Stichert and Ms. Feld expressed traffic and pedestrian safety
concerns about the proposed new bridge. Mr. Cummings asked if the
Commission was spinning its wheels because the DOT will ultimately choose
the most cost-effective bridge design, regardless of what the Commission
says. Ms. Brabender Mattox stated they were concerned with the impact the
new bridge would have on the view, setting, and accessibility of Park Plaza,
which the Commission considers to be potentially historically significant. Mr.
Ulrich commented that it is better to have a bridge that encourages people to
engage with the downtown area, not fly over it. He stated that if a case were
to be made, it would be to argue the importance of placemaking and that the
new bridge should be visually appealing, inviting, and not an industrial wall.
Ms. Feld expressed a desire to know what the specifications of the current
proposed bridge design are, since it has gone through multiple iterations. Ms.
Brabender Mattox stated that she could reach out to her contact at the DOT to
express the Commission’s intention to file a report but that it would not meet
the November 28th deadline.
d. Certified Local Government Program Historic Preservation Fund Subgrant
Application Nominees Update
Ms. Brabender Mattox asked Fels if she could explain what Sarah Phillips
and Mark Rohloff discussed in regards to this item, but Fels stated that she
did not know what the content of the conversation was, only that she was
aware it took place. Ms. Brabender Mattox stated that the Commission has
done previous historic district nominations using CLG grants and reiterated
that this one was for Oaks Candy and the old German Methodist Episcopal
Church, currently La Luz Del Mundo. The deadline for the application is in
December.
5) Staff Liaison Report
a. Monthly Building Permit Report
The Commissioners reviewed the month’s building permits. Ms. Brabender
Mattox stated she would contact David and Dorothy Zerbe to inform them
they may be eligible for historic tax credits for their heating and air
conditioning project. She also stated she would contact the Butlers, who are
intending to undertake a window project. There were also two roofing
projects for properties on Algoma Boulevard that might also qualify.
b. Agenda Items for Next Meeting
Mr. Cummings requested an item to discuss future historic districts on the
South Side of the city.
6) Adjournment
Ms. Feld motioned to adjourn and Ms. Stichert seconded. The meeting was adjourned at
4:33pm.