The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About37397 FCC 621 Form SHPO ReducedFCC Form FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB 3060 – 1039 Notification Date: See instructions for File Number: public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( ) NE – New UA – Update of Application WD – Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application currently on file. File Number: Applicant Information 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 4) Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Contact Information 10) P.O. Box: And /Or 11) Street Address: 12) City: 13) State: 14) Zip Code: 15) Telephone Number: 16) Fax Number: 17) E-mail Address: Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 19) Name: Principal Investigator 20) First Name: 21) MI: 22) Last Name: 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Principal Investigator Contact Information 25) P.O. Box: And /Or 26) Street Address: 27) City: 28) State: 29) Zip Code: 30) Telephone Number: 31) Fax Number: 32) E-mail Address: United States Cellular Corporation 0004372322 Lori Lee Regulatory Affairs Analyst 8410 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue Chicago IL 60631 (770)314-5422 0013123633 Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc. Lori.Lee@uscellular.com Jessica Moy 624 Water St Prairie du Sac WI 53578 (608)644-1449 Nepa@edgeconsult.com 1 of 28 NE 621 FCC Form 621 Collocation (CO) Submission Packet 0010599019 7AM EST 06/30/2023 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards? ( ) Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( ) Yes ( ) No If “YES,” complete the following: X X Cultural Resource/Environmental Specialist X 36) First Name: 37) MI: 38) Last Name: 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Jake Rieb X 36) First Name: 37) MI: 38) Last Name: 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Kevin McGowan X 2 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Jake W. Rieb. RPA, MA Archaeologist Principal Investigator NHPA Compliance Specialist BACKGROUND: Mr. Rieb is an SOI-qualified archaeologist with experience completing all phases of archaeological investigations required under federal or state historic preservation compliance. He has worked throughout the Midwest assisting private individuals, residential and commercial developers, and local, state, and federal government agencies – successfully negotiating both NEPA and Section 106 compliance requirements. Mr. Rieb has managed projects ranging from small telecommunications site studies to large highway corridor projects. He also has experience managing field crews and laboratory staff, coordinating the services of special materials analysts, and writing a wide variety of technical reports. Mr. Rieb is committed to strong client services and works hard to achieve client satisfaction. His extensive technical expertise, and mastery of federal compliance regulations are a great benefit in efficient project development. He takes great pride in delivering quality research, successful consultation, meeting deadlines and problem solving. EDUCATION: Master of Arts in Anthropology (Archaeology focus) UW-Madison (2011) Bachelor of Arts - College of Letters and Science UW-Madison (2008) Anthropology and History (Double Major) Archaeology Certificate PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) Wisconsin Archaeological Survey Illinois Archaeological Survey ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 10+ years with Edge Consulting Successfully completed hundreds of archaeological studies Laboratory analysis of diverse artifact assemblages including faunal remains from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. RELATED EXPERIENCE: Archaeological projects in WI, MN, IA, IL, MI, OH, ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, PA, TX, NC, NJ, CO NEPA & NHPA Section 106 Documentation Focus on telecommunications tower & collocation compliance reviews Licensed Remote Pilot (UAS/drone) AFFILIATIONS: Society for American Archaeology (SAA) Wisconsin Archeological Society (Treasurer 2010-2019) Minnesota Archaeological Society Iowa Archeological Society DR. KEVIN P. MCGOWAN, RPA Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program Department of Anthropology 1707 South Orchard Street University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 (217) 333-1636 Degrees: Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990. A.M., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1987. B.A., Magna cum laude from North Central College in 1979. Professional Experience: Current Position Title and Responsibilities: Program Director of the Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, responsible for the management of the research program for the Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Cultural Resource Management Experience: Have conducted archaeological and architectural investigations including agency consultation, background research, survey, testing, documentation, and excavation in the Midwest since 1981. Selected Recent Publications: McGowan, Kevin P. 2011 Phase 1 Intensive Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Pisgah Telecommunications Facility in Harrison County, Iowa. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2008 Phase I Archeological Reconnaissance of Portions of the Proposed Grand Ridge II & III Wind Farm in LaSalle County, Illinois. Research Report No. 123. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. McGowan, Kevin P. , Christopher Flynn, Virginia Hess, Michael Smith, and Jodi Blumenfeld 2010 Investigations of the Snyder Cemetery (11MH493) Under HSRPA Permit No. 2005-53 in McHenry County, Illinois. Research Report No. 152. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. McGowan, Kevin P. , Christopher Flynn, and Marcy A. Prchal 2008 Cultural Resources Investigations for the Southern Access Pipeline Stage 2 Project in Illinois Summer 2008. Southern Access Cultural Resources Report No. 8. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. McGowan, Kevin P. , Christopher Flynn, and Scott D. Sills 2010 Phase I Archeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Twin Grove IV Wind Farm Project in McLean County, Illinois. Research Report No. 155. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2010 National Register of Historic Places Data Recovery at 11L820 in Lake County, Illinois. Research Report No. 153. Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Site Information Tower Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: ____________________________ Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( ) No 3) Site Name: 4) Site Address: 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) City: 7) State: 8) Zip Code: 9) County/Borough/Parish: 10) Nearest Crossroads: 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) N or ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) E or ( ) W Collocation Information 13) Antennas will be located on (Select One): ( ) Communications Tower (Select One): ( ) Guyed Lattice Tower ( ) Self-supporting Lattice ( ) Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): ______________________________________________________________ ( ) Non-Tower Structure (Describe Structure): ________________________________________________________________________________ 14) Tower height above ground level (including top-mounted attachments such as lightning rods): ___________________ ( ) Feet ( ) Meters 15) Description of Antennas to be collocated (e.g. number, type, shape, dimensions, color): 16) Will the Antennas be placed at multiple levels on the structure? If “Yes”, describe placement: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ If “No”, specify the height of collocation above ground: ___________________ ( ) Feet ( ) Meters ( ) Yes ( ) No 17) Structure Completion Year: _____________________ (YYYY) ( ) Check here if your year provided is approximate. Oshkosh DT (776305) 530 N Main St (Edge 37397) Oshkosh WI WINNEBAGO N. Main Street & Merritt Avenue 44-01-13.5 088-32-14.8 X X 41.1 X 3 C Band Antenna 3 DoD Antenna 1 GPS Antenna 265855 Building with Antenna on topX X C Band Antennas @: 102', 123', 130' DoD Antennas @: 99', 118', 127' 1927 3 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Proposed colocation of antenna on a rooftop. Proposed associated equipment and antennas to be located adjacent to existing equipment and antenna. X X 54901 Projectt Number:: #37397 Projectt Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Projectt Address:: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 FIGUREE #1:: Regionall Mapp Project Location FIGUREE #2:: Streett Map Project Location Projectt Number:: #37397 Projectt Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Projectt Address:: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 FIGUREE #3:: USGSS 7.5-Minutee Quadranglee Project Location Projectt Number:: #37397 Projectt Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Projectt Address:: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 FIGUREE #4:: Aerial/Satellitee Plann Vieww Project Location Projectt Number:: #37397 Projectt Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Projectt Address:: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 FIGURE #5: Project Location Photographs VIEW NORTH TOWARD PROJECT LOCATION VIEW SOUTH TOWARD PROJECT LOCATION Photograph Date: April 20, 2023 Project Number: #37397 Project Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Project Address: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 FIGURE #5: Project Location Photographs VIEW EAST TOWARD PROJECT LOCATION VIEW WEST TOWARD PROJECT LOCATION Project Number: #37397 Project Name: USCC / OSHKOSH DT (776305) Project Address: 530 N. Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 Photograph Date: April 20, 2023 DATE:DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTAL: INT. SHEET NUMBER 6/20/2023 O: \ 3 7 3 0 0 \ 3 7 3 9 7 \ D e s i g n \ C A D \ C D \ P l o t \ G - 0 0 1 . d g n 37397 G-001 TAS 06/09/2023 T I T L E S H E E T BY CHECKED DATE PLOT NUMBER PROJECT TYPE SET CONSULTANT: CLIENT: www.edgeconsult.com 608.644.1549 FAX 608.644.1449 VOICE PRAIRIE DU SAC, WI 53578 624 WATER STREET W I S C O N S I N , O S H K O S H ) 7 7 6 3 0 5 ( O S H K O S H D T REV. A DRAFT CHICAGO, IL 60631 SUITE 700 8410 W. BRYN MAWR AVE. U.S. CELLULAR SCOPE OF WORK SHEET INDEXDIRECTORYSITE LOCATION MAP NORTH STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOULD BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DISCREPANCIES OR DISAGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE REPORT AND THESE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW STRUCTURAL REPORT IN ITS ENTIRETY. ANY SHEET TITLENO.: G-001 C-101 T-201 T-001 T-301 T-501 T-502 A-101 E-501 T-503 TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN SITE ELEVATION EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS GROUNDING DETAILS ANTENNA CONFIGURATION PLUMBING DIAGRAM CABLE DETAILS CABLE BANDING DETAILS EQUIIPMENT ROOM INTERIOR PLAN PROJECT INFO °-88.537200 LONG: °44.020400 LAT: SITE COORDINATES: OSHKOSH, WI 54901 600 MERRIT AVE OSHKOSH HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING OWNER: 776305SITE #: COUNTYWINNEBAGO 54901 WI, OSHKOSH 530 N. MAIN STREET SITE LOCATION: SITE LOCATION ROOFTOP INSTALLATION C-BAND & DoD ADDITION DRAWINGS WISCONSIN, OSHKOSH )776305 (OSHKOSH DT MICHELE ROTH CONTACT: CHICAGO, IL 60631 8410 W. BRYN MAWR AVE., SUITE 700 U.S. CELLULAR CLIENT: JENNI KELLIS CONTACT: GRETNA, NE 68028 19730 BELLBROOK BLVD. SITE ACQUISITION SOLUTIONS SITE ACQUISITION: P-501 INSTALLATION DETAILS C-102 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-501 BLOCK DIAGRAM C-501 GPS DETAILS MICHAEL MUEHRER PROJECT MANAGER: PRAIRIE DU SAC, WI 53578 624 WATER STREET EDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING COMPANY: MRM CONCLUSION: DATED: REPORT #: TBD EDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. MOUNT ANALYSIS (REPLACEMENT/EXISTING): CONCLUSION: DATED: REPORT #: TBD EDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: DATED: 05/08/2023REPORT #: 37397 EDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. INVENTORY REPORT: ANY WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PERFORMING DIMENSIONS/CONDITIONS ON SITE. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING 3 WORK DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE WI STATUTE 182.0175 (1974) REQUIRES MIN. OF FAX A LOCATE: 1-800-242-5811 TOLL FREE: 1-800-242-8511 WISCONSIN, CALL DIGGERS HOTLINE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG IN TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS' RESTRICTIVE CODE SHALL PREVAIL. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT THE MOST SUPPORT STRUCTURE WHERE SITE IS LOCATED. PLANNING, AND ZONING FOR ANTENNAS AND REQUIREMENTS CALLED OUT IN THE JURISDICTION, THESE SITE PLANS ADHERE TO ALL OF THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE- 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE- ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: STATE OF WISCONSIN. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED NOTED IN THE SHEET INDEX, AND OTHER THAN THE EXCEPTIONS UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION SET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN ENGINEER SEAL: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- PRELIMINARY - APPLICABLE CODES V-501 CABLE ROUTING TAS 06/20/2023 REV. B TO BE COMPLETED T-201 S I T E E L E V A T I O N C U.S. CELLULAR ALPHA SECTOR ANTENNAS D U.S. CELLULAR BETA SECTOR ANTENNAS E U.S. CELLULAR GAMMA SECTOR ANTENNASBEXISTING SITE ELEVATION SEE T-301 FOR DETAILS ANTENNAS ON EXISTING MOUNTS; EXISTING U.S. CELLULAR PANEL SEE T-301 FOR DETAILS MOUNTS; ANTENNA/RADIO ON PROPOSED C-BAND AND DoD INTEGRATED PROPOSED U.S. CELLULAR A SITE ELEVATION C / L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R C - B A N D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O @ 1 0 2 ' - 6 " A G L C/ L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R C - B A N D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O @ 1 3 0 ' - 6 " A G L WHIP ANTENNA EXISTING CARRIER EXISTING FLAG POLE PANEL ANTENNAS EXISTING CARRIER INSIDE PENTHOUSE EQUIP. ROOM U.S. CELLULAR COAX HOOD EXISTING ROOFTOP EX. A/C UNITS ALONG SIDE EXISTING COAX PRO. HYBRID CABLE ROUTING THE BASE OF ANTENNA WHERE CABLES EXTEND OUT AND ATTACH TO BE VISIBLE FROM GROUND LEVEL, OTHER THAN TUCKED BEHIND ANTENNA. CABLES SHOULD NOT - ROUTE JUMPERS AND CABLES IN A NEAT MANNER, BELOW ROOF PARAPET AND OR PENTHOUSE ANTENNAS AND RELATED MOUNTS TO BE LOCATED MATCH EXISTING BUILDING AND PENTHOUSE. ALL - ALL ANTENNAS & HARDWARE TO BE PAINTED TO NOTE: C / L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R D o D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O S @ 9 9 ' - 0 " A G L C/ L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R D o D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O S @ 1 2 7 ' - 0 " A G L C/ L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R D o D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O S @ 1 1 8 ' - 6 " A G L C/ L O F P R O P O S E D U . S . C E L L U L A R C - B A N D I N T E G R A T E D A N T E N N A / R A D I O @ 1 2 3 ' - 6 " A G L DATE:DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTAL: INT. SHEET NUMBER 6/20/2023 O: \ 3 7 3 0 0 \ 3 7 3 9 7 \ D e s i g n \ C A D \ C D \ P l o t \ T - 2 0 1 . d g n 37397 TAS 06/09/2023 BY CHECKED DATE PLOT NUMBER PROJECT TYPE SET CONSULTANT: CLIENT: www.edgeconsult.com 608.644.1549 FAX 608.644.1449 VOICE PRAIRIE DU SAC, WI 53578 624 WATER STREET W I S C O N S I N , O S H K O S H ) 7 7 6 3 0 5 ( O S H K O S H D T REV. A DRAFT CHICAGO, IL 60631 SUITE 700 8410 W. BRYN MAWR AVE. U.S. CELLULAR MRM STATE OF WISCONSIN. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED NOTED IN THE SHEET INDEX, AND OTHER THAN THE EXCEPTIONS UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION SET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN ENGINEER SEAL: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- PRELIMINARY - TAS 06/20/2023 REV. B ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED C-BAND INTEGRATED ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED DoD INTEGRATED DETAILS SEE MOUNT ANALYSIS LISTED ON SHEET G-001 FOR MOUNTING PIPE ON NEW STANDOFF WALL MOUNTS; PROPOSED 2-1/2" SCH 40 (2-7/8" O.D.) x 16' LONG STANDOFF WALL MOUNT TO BE RELOCATED TO NEW EXISTING AWS/LTE PANEL ANTENNA STANDOFF WALL MOUNT TO BE RELOCATED TO NEW EXISTING AWS/LTE PANEL ANTENNA DETAILS SEE MOUNT ANALYSIS LISTED ON SHEET G-001 FOR MOUNTING PIPE ON NEW STANDOFF WALL MOUNTS; PROPOSED 2-1/2" SCH 40 (2-7/8" O.D.) x 10' LONG ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED C-BAND INTEGRATED ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED DoD INTEGRATED DETAILS SEE MOUNT ANALYSIS LISTED ON SHEET G-001 FOR MOUNTING PIPE ON NEW STANDOFF WALL MOUNTS; PROPOSED 2-1/2" SCH 40 (2-7/8" O.D.) x 16' LONG ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED C-BAND INTEGRATED ANTENNA/RADIO PROPOSED DoD INTEGRATED T-501 I N S T A L L A T I O N D E T A I L S A PROPOSED ALPHA SECTOR INSTALLATION D 8" STANDOFF ANTENNA WALL MOUNT PLATE (ORDERED SEPARATELY) 24" LONG GALVANIZED CHANNEL BACKING APPROVED EQUIVALENT SITE PRO 1 PART #MM01 OR 8" STANDOFF ANTENNA WALL MOUNT; MANUFACTURER: SITE PRO 1 MODEL: MM01 8" STANDOFF ANTENNA WALL MOUNT U-BOLTS FOR 2-3/8" O.D. & 2-7/8" O.D. MOUNTING PIPES INCLUDED IF MOUNTING A 3-1/2" O.D. PIPE, PURCHASE U-BOLTS (UB1358) SEPARATELY MOUNTING HOLES ARE 11/16" ON 6" CENTERS PURCHASE MOUNTING PIPES SEPARATELY VERIFY WITH MOUNT ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED ON G-001 DETAIL INCLUDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY B PROPOSED BETA SECTOR INSTALLATION C PROPOSED GAMMA SECTOR INSTALLATION DATE:DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTAL: INT. SHEET NUMBER 6/20/2023 O: \ 3 7 3 0 0 \ 3 7 3 9 7 \ D e s i g n \ C A D \ C D \ P l o t \ T - 5 0 1 . d g n 37397 TAS 06/09/2023 BY CHECKED DATE PLOT NUMBER PROJECT TYPE SET CONSULTANT: CLIENT: www.edgeconsult.com 608.644.1549 FAX 608.644.1449 VOICE PRAIRIE DU SAC, WI 53578 624 WATER STREET W I S C O N S I N , O S H K O S H ) 7 7 6 3 0 5 ( O S H K O S H D T REV. A DRAFT CHICAGO, IL 60631 SUITE 700 8410 W. BRYN MAWR AVE. U.S. CELLULAR MRM STATE OF WISCONSIN. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED NOTED IN THE SHEET INDEX, AND OTHER THAN THE EXCEPTIONS UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION SET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN ENGINEER SEAL: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- PRELIMINARY - TAS 06/20/2023 REV. B 18) Has the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure been the subject of SHPO/THPO review? If “Yes”, specify the following: Company that made the submission: ______________________________________________________________ Date submitted: __________________ SHPO/THPO Reference Number: _____________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 19) Is the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure eligible for listing on the National Register? ( ) Yes ( ) No Collocation Status 20) Current Collocation Status (Select One): ( ) Construction and/or installation has not yet commenced ( ) Construction and/or installation has commenced, but is not completed Construction and/or installation commenced on: _______________ ( ) Construction has been completed Construction and/or installation commenced on: _______________ Construction and/or installation completed on: _______________ Determination of Effect 21) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 22) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE X X X FCC Form 621 4 of 28 May 2014 X X Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc 03/23/2021 21-0392/WN Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians 04/26/2023 X Edith Leoso THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation 04/27/2023 X Jonathan Windy Boy THPO 5 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Crow Creek Sioux Tribe 04/26/2023 X Merle Marks THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Forest County Potawatomi Community 04/26/2023 X Ben Rhodd THPO 6 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Ho-Chunk Nation 04/26/2023 X William Quackenbush Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma 04/26/2023 X Iowa Tribe TCNS Director 7 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Keweenaw Bay Indian Community 04/27/2023 X Alden Connor Jr Cultural Resources Director Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma 04/27/2023 X Pamela Wesley NAGPRA Representative 8 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin 04/26/2023 X Brian Bisonette Acting THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians 04/26/2023 04/26/2023 X Sarah Thompson E THPO 9 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians 04/26/2023 05/22/2023 X Alina Shively MrsJ THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 04/26/2023 X Brian Molyneaux PhDL Cultural Resources Consultant 10 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 04/26/2023 X David Grignon THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 04/26/2023 05/05/2023 X Scott Willard Cell Tower Coordinator 11 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians 04/26/2023 X Terry Kemper THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Northern Arapaho 04/26/2023 04/26/2023 X Benjamin Ridgley THPO 12 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Northern Cheyenne Tribe 04/26/2023 04/28/2023 X Gary LaFranier FCC Specialist Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 04/26/2023 X Jarell Grant THPO 13 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians 04/26/2023 X Elsie Whitehorn Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma 04/26/2023 X Rhonda Hayworth THPO Dept 14 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians 04/26/2023 X Matthew Bussler Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 04/27/2023 X Liana Hesler S THPO 15 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation 04/26/2023 X Tara Mitchell Deputy Tribal Historic Preservation Offi Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Prairie Island Indian Community 04/26/2023 X Noah White IIIC THPO 16 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin 04/26/2023 X Marvin DeFoe THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota 04/26/2023 X Kade Ferris MSM Tribal Archaeologist/THPO 17 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Rosebud Sioux Tribe 04/27/2023 X Benjamin Young Section 106 Compliance Coordinator Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa 04/27/2023 X Johnathan Buffalo L Historic Preservation Director 18 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Santee Sioux Nation of Nebraska 04/26/2023 X Misty Flowers Tribal Historic Preservation Office Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation 04/26/2023 X Alicia Cloud TCNS Compliance Reviewer 19 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa 04/26/2023 X Larus Longie Acting THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Upper Sioux Community of Minnesota 04/26/2023 05/05/2023 X Samantha Odegard THPO 20 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 265855 34 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska 04/26/2023 04/27/2023 X Interim THPO Staff _ CPD/THPO Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Wyandotte Nation 04/26/2023 X Sherri Clemons THPO 21 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tribe/NHO Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: And /Or 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted _______________ 18) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 22 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Historic Properties Properties Identified 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? ( ) Yes ( ) No 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? If “Yes”, you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. ( ) Yes ( ) No Historic Property 4) Property Name: 5) SHPO Site Number: Property Address 6) Street Address: 7) City: 8) State: 9) Zip Code: 10) County/Borough/Parish: Status & Eligibility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE X X X 23 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 E Irving and Church Washington Avenue Algoma Boulevard North Main Street Paine Lumber Company Oshkosh State Normal School Washington Street Neoclassical HD Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Location Oshkosh, WI Quadrangle Winnebago County, WI 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 1992 0 0.5 10.25 Kilometers 0 0.5 10.25 Miles NRHP Historic District Proposed Facility Location Area of Potential Effect (0.5 mile radius) KEY 2 Figure 1. Location of project area. E Irving and Church North Main Street Washington Street Neoclassical HD Oshkosh State Normal School Location 0 0.25 0.50.13 Kilometers 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles NRHP #96000250NRHP #74000142 NRHP #95000247 AHI #135401AHI #27595 AHI #66747 Figure 2. Photo Key of Recorded Architectural Resources. 17 Architectural Resource Location# NRHP Historic District Proposed Facility Location Area of Potential Effect (0.5 mile radius) KEY Aerial Photograph Obtained from ESRI World Imagery - May 2023 530 N Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 Merritt Ave Washington Ave E Parkway Ave E Irving Ave N M a i n S t D i v i s i o n S t C e n t r a l S t Rt . 4 5 Je f f e r s o n S t Ch u r c h A v e Alg o m a B l v d Hig h A v e Fox Ri v e r CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED OSHKOSH DT TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ADDITIONS IN OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN For Submission To and Funded By: Mr. Jake Rieb Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc. 624 Water Street Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin 53578 By: Ms. Marcy Prchal and Mr. Christopher Flynn Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program Department of Anthropology 1707 South Orchard Street University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 (217) 333-1636 (Project No. 23-096) Dr. Kevin P. McGowan, Principal Investigator 20 June 2023 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ..................................................................................................................... 3 Winnebago County .................................................................................................................................. 3 Architectural History ............................................................................................................................... 5 RESEARCH METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 12 Archival Methods .................................................................................................................................. 12 Field Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 12 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................................................ 13 Archival Results .................................................................................................................................... 13 Architectural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 16 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 26 CITED SOURCES ....................................................................................................................................... 27 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Location of Project Area ..................................................................................................................... 2 2. Photo Key of Recorded Architectural Resources ............................................................................. 17 3. Project location: Raulf Hotel, 530 North Main Street ...................................................................... 19 4. Project location: North Main Street NRHP Historic District (NRHP #96000250/City of Oshkosh Historic District) ............................................................................................................................... 19 5. NRHP Resource 1: First Methodist Church (Wagner Opera House) (NRHP #95000247/AHI #44811/Oshkosh Landmark), 502 North Main Street ...................................................................... 20 6. View to project from NRHP Resource 1 .......................................................................................... 20 7. NRHP Resource 3: First Presbyterian Church (NRHP #74000142/AHI #40931), 110 Church Avenue ............................................................................................................................................. 21 8. View to project from NRHP Resource 3 .......................................................................................... 21 9. WHPD Resource 11: First Baptist Temple (AHI #27595), 138 Church Avenue ............................. 22 10. View to project from WHPD Resource 11 ....................................................................................... 22 11. WHPD Resource 12: Edwin W. Cole House (AHI #66747), 121 Church Avenue .......................... 24 12. View to project from WHPD Resource 12 ....................................................................................... 24 13. WHPD Resource 42: Dr. Philander A. Wheeler House (AHI #135401), 541 Jefferson Street and View to Project ................................................................................................................................. 25 INTRODUCTION The Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program of the University of Illinois at Urbana– Champaign was contracted by Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc. of Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin to conduct a cultural resource survey for direct and indirect architectural effects for a proposed telecommunications facility upgrade. The investigations were undertaken in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review Under the National Historic Preservation Act for new facilities requiring licenses from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This Cultural Resources Report provides general background information including the local and architectural history for the project area, the methods used to complete the architectural investigations, and the results of those investigations. A telecommunications facility upgrade (collocation) is proposed for a property located at 530 North Main Street, Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin 54901. The project as proposed includes the removal of coax cables and jumpers and a CDMA GPS antenna and collocation addition of three new C Band antenna-radios, three new DoD antenna-radios, and one C-Band & DoD GPS antenna adjacent to existing antennas on the penthouse of the building, for a project with a total height of 48.2 meters (158 feet). The area of direct effects therefore is focused on the property located at 530 North Main Street. The indirect (visual) Area of Potential Effect (APE) is centered on the proposed facility location in accordance with the Final Rule for 47 CFR Part 1, that specifies a 0.8-kilometer (0.5-mile) radius APE for total structure height of 60.96 meters (200 feet) or less, a 1.2-kilometer (0.75-mile) radius APE for structures over 60.96 meters (200 feet) to 121.92 meters (400 feet), and a 2.4-kilometer (1.5-mile) radius APE for all structures over 121.92 meters (400 feet) in total height. A 0.8- kilometer (0.5-mile) radius APE was utilized for this project based on the project height that was 60.96 meters (200 feet) or less (Figure 1). The cultural resource study included the development of an architectural and historical context, a review of existing recorded resources that are listed or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and a review of the potentially effected resources with evaluations of effect. The findings for the project are provided in the subsequent sections. 1 E Irving and Church Washington Avenue Algoma Boulevard North Main Street Paine Lumber Company Oshkosh State Normal School Washington Street Neoclassical HD Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Location Oshkosh, WI Quadrangle Winnebago County, WI 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 1992 0 0.5 10.25 Kilometers 0 0.5 10.25 Miles NRHP Historic District Proposed Facility Location Area of Potential Effect (0.5 mile radius) KEY 2 Figure 1. Location of project area. 3 BACKGROUND RESEARCH The proposed telecommunications facility is at 530 North Main Street, Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin 54901. The evaluation of architectural resources at this location requires an understanding of the historical and architectural context for this area of Wisconsin. The results of the contextual background research are provided below. Winnebago County Winnebago County lies in the middle Fox River valley in eastern Wisconsin, bordered on the south by Fond du Lac County, on the west by Waushara and Green counties, and on the north by Waupaca and Outagamie counties. Winnebago’s eastern neighbor is Calumet County, but the two are separated for all but three miles by Lake Winnebago, the largest lake in Wisconsin covering 350 square miles. The rolling topography of Winnebago County lies on average about fifty feet above the surface of the lake, and the soil, though composed of much glacial till, is well-drained and agriculturally rich. Before the advent of Euro-American settlement, the county was covered with hardwood forest including oak, elm, basswood, ash and hickory. Plum, Cherry, Crabapple and other fruit trees thrived, as did a great variety of terrestrial, aquatic, and avian wildlife. The Upper Fox River enters the county in the southwest and, traversing north and east, forms Lake Butte des Morts before entering Lake Winnebago at the present site of Oshkosh. Wolf River enters in the northwest, forms Lakes Poygan and Winneconne, and joins the Fox at Lake Butte des Morts. The Lower Fox River exits Lake Winnebago in the northeast corner of the county on its way to Green Bay. The six lakes and two major river systems in Winnebago County drain the watershed of approximately one-quarter of the State of Wisconsin (Lawson 1908). The first Euro-American to visit the area of Winnebago County was the French explorer, Jean Nicolet, who landed at Green Bay and is thought to have ascended the Fox River as far as Lake Winnebago in the 1640s (Lawson 1908). At that time the region was home to the indigenous Winnebago tribe, and groups of Chippewa, Pottawatomi, Sauk, Fox, and Menominee frequented the area as well. The French Jesuit, Father Allouez, established a Catholic mission at De Pere, near Green Bay in 1668, probably the first European outpost on the Fox River, which linked Lake Michigan with the interior forests and beyond to the Mississippi River. The first French trader thought to have settled in Winnebago County was a retired soldier of the French-Canadian army, Sebrevior de Carrie. Sometime between 1730 and 1760, de Carrie settled and raised a family with a Winnebago woman on Doty Island, where the Lower Fox exits Lake Winnebago, trading with groups moving up and down the river valley (Lawson 1908; Randall 1889). Captain Augustin Grignon and Judge James Porlier established a trading post at Big Butte des Morts by 1818. They traded beads, calico, guns, axes and other goods to the Menominee and Winnebago in exchange for animal furs and pelts of all kinds, which were shipped east and sold to the Southwest Fur Company and later the American Fur Company. Beaver pelts were used as money value for all commerce on the river (Lawson 1908). The location of Oshkosh was first settled by James Knaggs, a quarter-blood Menominee, who in 1832 established a trading post on the Fox River near the present downtown. Knaggs provided food and sleeping accommodation as well as ferry service across the river. That same year, Peter Powell came from Green Bay and settled on the north shore of Lake Butte des Morts, farming and trading. His son, the future Major William Powell, lived near Oshkosh most of his life and was active in U. S. Government- Native American relations for many years (Lawson 1908). George Johnson built two log cabins and opened a tavern near the mouth of the Upper Fox in 1835. Webster Stanley, credited with being the first 4 permanent non-Indian settler in the present city of Oshkosh, obtained lumber prepared at the government mill in Neenah and built his cabin in 1836, across the river from James Knaggs. Stanley bought out Knaggs’ ferry business and began construction of a sawmill. Other settlers in the next few years included Chester and Milan Ford, Jason Wilkins, and Joseph Jackson, who built the first frame house in Oshkosh in 1844 (Randall 1889). The first Euro-American settlements in Winnebago County clustered around the Upper and Lower Fox River and along the shore of Lake Winnebago, at Butte des Morts, Oshkosh (then called Saukeer), Stanley’s Ferry, and up the lake coast at Neenah. The first attempt to establish the County of Winnebago occurred in 1840 when the state legislature set it off from Brown County with the boundaries as they currently exist. Nathaniel Perry, Robert Grignon, and Morgan L. Martin were appointed commissioners to locate the county seat and acquire land for a courthouse. Elections were to be held at the home of Webster Stanley but, possibly due to low population in the county, this attempt at organization failed. It was not until 1842 that a law was again approved to organize Winnebago County, population 143, effective the first Monday in April 1843. Officials elected to complete this task included: Chester Ford, chairman; Jason Wilkins, clerk; Thomas Lee, coroner; and Webster Stanley, treasurer. The first actual county elections were held in September 1844, in which W. C. Isbell was elected register of deeds, George F. Wright, clerk, William Wright, treasurer, and Samuel Brooks, district attorney. In 1847 the county seat was located at Oshkosh, and the county was organized for judicial purposes. The population of the county in 1847 was 2,787, and in 1850 it had grown to over 10,000 (Lawson 1908). The growth of Oshkosh, and Winnebago County’s two other major cities, Neenah and Menasha, was closely tied to the lumber industry that flourished in the nineteenth century. The first sawmill was erected in Neenah, at the government trading post and industrial and agricultural mission established for the Menominee Indians in 1834. Mills were soon operating at Omro, Algoma, and Oshkosh, processing lumber that flooded down the rivers from the north and west. The mills spawned related industries such as sash and door factories, furniture factories, shingle factories, and paper mills. By 1860, Oshkosh had eleven lumber mills in operation. The arrival of the railroad in 1859 brought rapid expansion and growth to Oshkosh that continued into the middle 1870s. Major fires swept through the city in 1874 and 1875, just as the lumber industry began a long and slow decline. By the late 1870s, as resources nearby became exhausted, the sawmill industry began to follow the line of de-forestation north and northwest. Through the 1880s and 1890s, mills were shut down and board feet of production declined until the last log drive took place on the Fox River in 1911(City of Oshkosh 2023). Other industries developed in Winnebago County as the lumber industry declined. Ice from the rivers and lakes was harvested for domestic use and frequently shipped to Milwaukee and Chicago. Brickmaking, from the abundant red clays found in the county, became a thriving industry in the 1870s. Several large brick making yards operated in Menasha between 1871 and 1890, and in Neenah through the 1890s, some manufacturing over two million bricks a year. Many of the early wooden structures in Oshkosh destroyed by the fires in 1874-5 were rebuilt with brick and still survive today. A stoneware industry was established as early as 1850 in Menasha, using a mix of local red clay and Ohio stone clay for a slip, but these enterprises were abandoned by 1875 (Lawson 1908). As industry in the urban centers grew and changed, so did the population of Winnebago County. The original settlers were mostly Yankee farmers looking for cheap land and commercial opportunities. From the middle 1840s European immigrants, especially Germans, Irish, and Welsh, moved to the towns and farmland of Winnebago County. Later Poles, Volga-Germans, and Scandinavians settled in large numbers. By 1900 it was estimated that one-third of the residents of Oshkosh were German-speaking or of German heritage. At the turn of the twentieth century, Oshkosh was ranked second in population in the state after Milwaukee, and the whole of Winnebago County contained over sixty thousand people (Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System 2023; Lawson 1908). 5 Architectural History A review of the architectural records for the Midwest shows changing architectural styles that fit the needs of the growing community and reflected the changing fashions of different eras. Early Euro- American building styles in North America reflect styles that were popular in Europe at the time of the arrival of the colonists. While the fundamental ideas behind these styles survived the journey to the New World, the construction techniques often had to be altered to fit their new location. Initially, building styles varied from region to region, but as the population grew and methods of transportation improved, ideas and materials became more widely available. Over the course of time, both populations and styles of architecture became more homogenous. As the population grew, and with the introduction of the railroads and improvements to the roadways, ideas and building materials became available to a much larger number of people than ever before. House forms Most architectural styles in Midwest, and throughout the United States, are based on basic Vernacular styles of building. These styles include the Gable-Front, the Gabled Ell/Gable-Front-and-Wing, the Hall- and-Parlor, the I-House, the Massed-Plan Side-Gabled, and the Pyramidal. These styles form the basic shapes for building design through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Gable-Front style is first seen in the mid-nineteenth century. This style, usually consisting of two stories with the gabled end on the street side, grew in popularity with the growth of urban areas, as it could be adapted to a variety of popular styles as well as narrow urban lots. The placing of the entry at the gable end forced a change in the traditional floor plan, and the stairway was moved from the center of the building to the side, forming a long hallway to the rear (Longstreth 2000). This style, which persisted in different forms through the early twentieth century, is found throughout the Midwest. In the Gabled Ell/Gable-Front-and-Wing design, a side-gabled wing was added to the existing gable-front at a right angle. A shed-roofed porch is usually present in the “L” shape made by the attached wings. Two-story examples are common in the Midwest (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 92) The Hall-and-Parlor house is based on a British building style, the single-bay house, and was brought to the Midwest from the Chesapeake Bay area. Hall-and-Parlor houses were usually constructed as a single room brick or frame structure with a steep pitched side-gabled roof and outside chimneys. This first room was the “hall”, and housed the kitchen, dining room, and work area, with a corner stairway leading to sleeping space on a loft above. A second room was added at the back when the space was needed. This “parlor” would serve as a bedroom or a room for entertaining. The Hall-and-Parlor house is characterized by a front door offset with one window, giving the façade an asymmetrical appearance (Longstreth 2000). The I-House developed from the earlier one-and-one-half story Hall-and-Parlor into a unique two- story house style. This style, named for its common occurrence in states beginning with the letter “I”, was one room deep, two rooms wide, and two stories tall with a side-gabled roof. This house could be built using a variety of materials, including brick, clapboard, and stone, and the chimneys were placed at either gable end. More space could be added through the construction of porches or wings. Decorative details vary depending on the period; this style was popular in North America from the late seventeenth century through the early twentieth (Longstreth 2000). 6 Massed-Planned Side-Gabled houses are significant in that they are more than one room deep, and as a result began to replace the I-House and Hall-and-Parlor designs. Early examples of this style often have a full front porch, but post-1930 designs typically have either a small entry porch or none at all (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 98). The Pyramidal Roof style of house has its origins in the French-settled areas of the southern United States. This style is typically a one-story frame structure with a simple front porch. The roof is steeply pitched and there is a central chimney. This house style may have additions, such as towers or ells (Longstreth 2000). The architectural styles discussed below demonstrate the development of architectural ideas in the Midwest in the nineteenth century and show the forms most commonly found throughout the Midwest. All of these styles may be found in both pure and Vernacular forms and may include only some or all of the characteristics common to that style. Romantic Style Romantic style architecture was popular across the United States from the period 1820 to 1880. Romantic architecture marks the beginning of a trend that saw several different types of architecture with different influences become popular at the same time. The Romantic styles were influenced primarily by building styles of the past, and the types included in this category are Greek Revival, Gothic Revival, Italianate, Exotic Revivals, and Octagon. Each of these styles began and became popular before 1860 (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 177). Greek Revival architecture was dominant in America from 1825 to 1860. This style is found in highest concentration in the East, South, Midwest, and California. Illinois has one of the highest concentrations of Greek Revival buildings in the country. Characteristics of this style include a gabled or hipped low-pitched roof, a wide band of trim, meant to represent classical entablature, at the cornice line of the main roof and porch roof, porches with prominent square or rounded columns (usually Doric), a front door with narrow sidelights and rectangular transom lights set into an elaborate door surround. Both the Gable-front and the Gable-front-and-wing, style of house, originated in this style of building (McAlester and McAlester 1984:179-184). The Gothic Revival style of architecture was based on Medieval European construction and is characterized by fanciful decorative ornamentation. Seen from 1840 to 1880, elements of the Gothic Revival style include a steeply pitched roof that is usually side-gabled with steep cross gables (though other forms exist), decorated verge boards on the gables, a wall surface that extends into the gable without a break, pointed-arched windows that extend into the gables, and a one-story porch supported by flat Gothic arches. Examples of Gothic architecture, popularized by Andrew Jackson Downing’s famous pattern books of the 1840s and 1850s, can be found throughout areas of the United States settled before 1880 (McAlester and McAlester 1984:197-200). Italianate style houses were designed to model rambling Italian farmhouses. The first such houses were built in the United States in the late 1830s, and they became popular and widespread in the 1840s and 1850s, influenced by the Downing’s writings. Most surviving Italianate style homes date from 1855 to 1880, with rarer examples from the 1840s and late 1880s. Common characteristic of Italianate style construction include two or three stories, a low-pitched roof with widely overhanging eaves and decorative brackets, tall, narrow windows that are usually curved or arched on top, and elaborate window crowns. Many examples also include a square cupola or tower. Italianate style houses became common in 7 the Midwest as the region grew at the height of the style’s popularity (McAlester and McAlester 1984:211-214). The term Exotic Revival does not define a style as much as it defines decorative ideas that were applied to other Romantic style houses. There are three main types of Exotic Revival style decoration: Egyptian, Oriental, and Swiss Chalet. The Egyptian style is characterized by Egyptian columns, designed to represent bundles of sticks tied together at the top and bottom and then flared at the top, added to Greek or Italianate forms. Characteristics of the Oriental style include ogee arches, oriental trim, and the Turkish or onion dome. The main characteristics of the Swiss Chalet style include low-pitched front-gabled roofs with wide eave overhangs, a second story balcony or porch with trim and balustrade with a flat, cutout pattern, and patterned stickwork decoration. Exotic Revival decoration was used from 1835 to circa 1890, but surviving examples are rare (McAlester and McAlester 1984:231). The defining characteristic of the Octagon house is its eight-sided shape. This style, found in the East and Midwest from 1850 to 1870, is also characterized by two stories, a low-pitched hipped roof, wide eave overhangs, and eave brackets. Some examples of the Octagonal style have six, ten, twelve, or sixteen sides, and some are round. This style is rare, and most surviving examples date from the 1850s and 1860s (McAlester and McAlester 1984:235). Victorian Design Victorian Houses were constructed throughout the Midwestern region from 1860 to 1900. This building style became popular and spread quickly due to the rapid growth of industry and the railroads. The development in Chicago in the 1830s of the balloon frame, a lighter framing system that replaced heavy timber framing, allowed architects to move away from the box-like shape of traditional building. This new system of framing, along with the growth of mass production of items such as nails, doors, windows, roofing, siding, and decorative details, and the introduction of the circular saw made this style of house cheaper to build and therefore available to more people (Carley 1994:108). There are five main subtypes of Victorian houses in the Midwest, including Second Empire, Stick, Queen Anne, Richardsonian Romanesque, and Folk Victorian (McAlester and McAlester 1984). The Second Empire style was popular, mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, from 1855-1885. This Victorian subtype is characterized by a mansard roof with dormer windows, molded cornices, decorative brackets beneath the eaves, and unelaborated, usually arched, windows. This style became popular because the box-shaped roofline allowed for a full upper story of usable space (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 241-242). Stick Houses were constructed from 1860 to circa 1890. The Stick style is characterized by a gabled roof which usually has a steep pitch and cross gables, decorative trusses at the apex of the gables, exposed rafter ends, wooden wall cladding with decorative boards (stickwork) in patterns raised from the wall surfaces, and diagonal or curved brackets on one-story porches. The stickwork decoration has been applied to a variety of house shapes (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 255-256). The Queen Anne style was popular from 1880 to 1910. Typical characteristics of the Queen Anne are a steeply pitched roof, irregular shape, a dominant front-facing gable, patterned shingles, cut-away bay windows, an asymmetrical façade with a partial or full-width porch (usually one story), and decorative treatments designed to avoid flat wall surfaces (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 263). 8 Richardsonian Romanesque buildings were constructed from 1880 to 1900. This style is characterized by round-topped arches over windows, porch supports, or entrances, masonry walls that are usually of rough-faced square stone work, round towers with conical roofs, asymmetrical facades, and deeply recessed windows. Because heavy masonry was used throughout the building, the Richardsonian Romanesque style was more popular for large public buildings and architect-designed landmarks rather than middle-class homes (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 301-302). The Folk Victorian style was common from 1870 to 1910. These houses were often less elaborate than their other Victorian counterparts and were constructed in a variety of shapes and styles. One common form of Folk Victorian building was created by simply adding porches with spindlework detailing or flat jigsaw cut trim to the National Folk House forms. These houses were usually symmetrical or of the gable front-and-wing form, and common motifs include cornice-lined brackets and simple window designs (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 309). Eclecticism Eclectic design, popular throughout the United States, began to appear in the 1880s, usually in the form of period homes for the wealthy. The Eclectic style, in contrast to the stylistic forms of the Victorian era, was based on designing pure copies of traditional architectural forms. The style grew in popularity after it was used in the construction of temporary buildings for the 1893 Chicago Columbian Exposition but did not become accessible to the middle class until the 1920s, when new and less expensive techniques for adding brick and stone veneer to the exterior of frame houses were developed. There are thirteen main subtypes of Eclectic design that are found in the Midwest: Colonial Revival, Neoclassical, Tudor, Beaux Arts, French Eclectic, Italian Renaissance, Mission, Spanish Eclectic, Monterey, Prairie, Craftsman, Modernistic, and International (McAlester and McAlester 1984). Based on the English and Dutch houses of the Atlantic seaboard, the Colonial Revival style is found beginning in the 1880s and continuing until around 1955. This was a dominant style for domestic buildings throughout the first half of the twentieth century. Doors are typically centered and may be accentuated with overhead fanlights or sidelights and a decorative crown supported by pilasters or extended forward and supported by slender columns. Windows in this style are symmetrically balanced, and usually have double-hung sashes and multi-pane glazing. This style may have any of a number of roof types, including hipped, side-gabled, center-gabled, or gambrel. The Colonial Revival style was simplified in the 1940s and 1950s, when the side-gabled roof became the most common form, and decorative accents such as door surrounds and cornices became more stylized (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 321, 324). Like the Colonial Revival style, the Neoclassical style, made popular by the 1893 Chicago Columbian Exposition, was a dominant style for domestic buildings throughout the first half of the twentieth century. This style is dominated by a full height front porch, with the roof supported by classical columns, usually with Ionic or Corinthian capitals; the porch may be simply an entry, an entry with a lower full-width porch, or it may be a full façade porch. The house can be one or more stories, with symmetrically balanced rectangular windows and a center door with elaborate decorative surrounds. Neoclassical buildings also usually display a boxed eave with a moderate overhang, and sometimes a wide frieze band. From about 1900 to 1920, hipped roofs and elaborate columns were common on this style, but from about 1925 until 1955, side-gabled roofs and simple slender columns became more popular (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 343-344). 9 The Tudor style, seen from 1890-1940, makes up a large proportion of early twentieth century suburban housing. This style, based on late Medieval English designs, is characterized by a steeply pitched, usually side-gabled, roof with one or more prominent and steeply pitched cross gables, decorative half-timbering, tall and narrow windows, massive chimneys, and cladding of stucco, brick, stone, or wood. Some structures may also have a false thatched roof and parapeted gables. Tudor houses were extremely popular in the 1920s and 1930s when they became cheaper to build because of masonry veneering. The style faded in the late 1930s but experienced a rebirth in popularity in the 1970s and 1980s (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 355-358). Beaux Arts buildings are found throughout the United States from 1885 to 1930. Common characteristics of this style include masonry wall surfaces with decorative garlands, floral patterns, and shields and symmetrical facades with quoins, pilasters, or columns. The roof is usually either flat, low- pitched, or mansard. This style is the result of a growing interest at the end of the nineteenth century in formal planning and spatial relationships between buildings, exemplified by the City Beautiful Movement and the Chicago Columbian Exposition in 1893. Because of its elaborateness, this style is most often found in the form of architect-designed landmarks, or in urban areas that were prosperous in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 379-380). The French Eclectic style was relatively uncommon style that came into use in 1915. French Eclectic buildings are characterized by a tall, steeply pitched hipped roof, eaves that flare at the roof-wall junction, occasional half timbering, and wall coverings of brick, stone, or stucco. This style faded out in the mid- 1940s but experienced a resurgence in the 1960s (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 387). The Italian Renaissance style began in the 1890s as a style used for landmark buildings, but by the 1902s it had entered the world of vernacular design. Common characteristics of the Italian Renaissance style include a low-pitched, sometimes flat, hipped roof that is usually covered in ceramic tiles, broadly overhanging box eaves with decorative brackets, upper story windows that are smaller than the those on the lower stories, arches above the doors, first story windows, and porches, small Classical columns or pilasters, a symmetrical façade, and stucco, masonry, or masonry-veneered walls. After World War I, further developments in masonry veneering allowed cheaper versions of Italian Renaissance buildings to be constructed, but the style faded out of popularity by 1935 (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 397-398). Although most popular in California and the Southwest, the Mission style does appear in in the Midwest, usually dating from about 1905-1920. Based on the Spanish Missions of California, common characteristics of this style include Mission-shaped dormer or roof parapets, red tile roof covering, widely overhanging eaves, large square piers to support porch roofs, and stucco wall surfaces (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 409-410). Spanish Eclectic buildings were constructed from 1915-1940. Aspects of this style include a low- pitched roof (which may be side-gabled, cross-gabled, hipped, combined hipped and gabled, or flat) with little or no overhang and covered with red tiles, one or more arches above the door, principal window, and porch, an asymmetrical façade, dramatically carved doors, a focal window, decorative window grilles of wood or iron, cantilevered balconies, arcaded walkways, round or square towers, roof-tiled chimney tops, fountains, and stucco wall coverings. Decorative motifs usually follow Moorish, Byzantine, Gothic, or Renaissance designs. This style reached its height of popularity in the 1920s and 1903’s, and it was rarely used after 1940 (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 417-418). The Monterey style was used in suburbs throughout the country from about 1925-1955. This style is recognized by its low-pitched gabled roof, second story balcony which is usually cantilevered and covered by the principal roof, a wood shingled roof (though it may be tiled), paired windows and false 10 shutters, and an outer covering of stucco, brick, or wood, with the first and second story often covered with different materials (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 431). The Prairie style, most often associated with architect and designer Frank Lloyd Wright, originated in Chicago and is found in many of the City’s early twentieth century suburbs. This style, popular from 1900-1920, is characterized by a low pitched, usually hipped, roof with wide overhanging eaves, a two- story construction with one-story wings or porches, massive square or rectangular masonry piers, window boxes, decorative friezes, and an emphasis on horizontal lines in eaves, cornices, and the façade. Design motifs are usually geometrical, with an emphasis on horizontal decoration, contrasting wall materials and wood trim between stories, contrasting colors, selective recessing, geometrical patterns of small pane window glazing, and contrasting wall materials which accentuate the upper part of the upper story (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 439-440). The dominant style for smaller houses throughout the country from about 1905-1925 was the Craftsman style. One of the reasons for the popularity of this style was its easy accessibility through catalogues and kits. One of the most distinguishing characteristics of Craftsman houses is the roof-wall junction, which is almost never boxed or enclosed. Common aspects of this style include low-pitched hipped or gabled roofs, wide unenclosed eave overhangs, exposed roof rafters, false beams or braces under the gables, and full and partial-width porches with a roof supported by tapered square columns which often extend to the ground level. Exterior walls are usually of wood clapboard or shingles, but may also be of brick, concrete block, or stucco. One-story vernacular versions of this style are commonly called Bungalows or Bungaloid (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 453-454). Modernistic buildings, built from 1920 to 1940, can be divided into two main groups, Art Moderne, which became the prevailing Modernistic style, and Art Deco. Art Moderne buildings tend to have smooth stucco wall surfaces decorated with horizontal grooves or lines, a flat roof with a small ledge at the roofline, horizontal balustrade elements, and an asymmetrical façade. One or more corners on an Art Moderne building may be curved and have curved windows, and the design may also include round or glass block windows. In contrast, Art Deco buildings use zigzags, chevrons, and other stylized geometric motifs on the façade, and include towers and various other projections above the roofline. Art Deco was more common in public and commercial buildings and apartments than in homes. The style came into fashion after architect Eliel Saarinen won second place in the Chicago Tribune’s 1922 headquarters’ design contest for his Art Deco design (McAlester and McAlester 19848: 465-466). The International style, used from 1925 through to the present day, was introduced to the United States by European architects, immigrating to escape the tensions at home. Common characteristics of the International style include a flat roof, usually without ledges, windows set flush with the walls, smooth unadorned wall surfaces, an asymmetrical façade, curtain walls, cantilevered projections, and an absence of decorative detailing around doors and windows. Buildings in this style are usually architect designed and found in more fashionable suburbs. The International style was at its peak of popularity in the 1930s, but experienced a resurgence in the 1970s (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 469-470). Design after World War II After World War II, American construction tastes shifted from more traditional designs to modern styles. These styles, common throughout the post-war suburbs, include Minimal Traditional, Ranch, Contemporary, and Shed. While these styles may retain some details from the Craftsman, Prairie, Modernistic, and International styles, an effort was made to stay away from the designs used in America in the early twentieth century. 11 Minimal Traditional design was popular in the 1940s and 1950s. This style is often seen as a simplified version of the traditional Tudor style. Aspects of Minimal Traditional design include a dominant front gable with a lowered roof pitch and simplified façade. In the early 1950s, the Minimal Traditional houses were replaced by the Ranch style, with its characteristic low-pitched roof and broad rambling facades. Ranch homes, loosely based on Colonial designs, also usually display decorative shutters, porch roof supports, and other detailing. A Ranch home may be one story or split-level. Contemporary design is represented by the architect-designed houses of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. Contemporary buildings are recognizable by their wide eave overhangs, flat or low-pitched roofs, broad and low front-facing gables, exposed support beams and other structural members, contrasting wall materials and textures, and unusual window shapes and placements. The Shed style, used in the 1960s and 1970s, is characterized by moderately or high-pitched roofs with a shed-roof motif. This style is also more common in architect-designed homes (McAlester and McAlester 19848: 475, 477). From 1965 to the present day, the Neoeclectic style has been popular throughout the country. Used mostly in suburban areas, the Neoeclectic style may be divided up into seven sub-categories. The Mansard style, named for the use of the mansard roof, was used in homes, shopping centers, apartments, and commercial buildings in the 1960s. Neocolonial design was based on the English Colonial home and was popular from 1940 through the 1970s. The Neo-French style was the most fashionable style in the 1980s and is recognizable in its use of high-hipped roofs and through-the-cornice doorways. The Neo- Tudor style, characterized by steeply pitched gables and half-timbered detailing, has been popular since the 1970s. Neo-Mediterranean homes use stucco walls, rounded arches, and red tile roofs to mimic the styles of earlier Spanish and Italian influenced styles. The Neoclassical revival style is loosely based on the Neoclassical style but may be applied to different house forms without concern for traditional or historically accurate details. The Neo-Victorian style uses details such as Queen Anne-influenced spindlework for porches and other decorative elements (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 487). A final category, Contemporary Folk designs, is found from 1940 through the present. Structures built in this style are often experimental and tend to stay away from traditional designs. One of the main goals of Contemporary Folk architectural design is “basic, economical shelter without concern for fashionable stylistic design or detailing” (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 497). The most common forms of Contemporary Folk structures include Mobile Homes, Quonset Huts, A-Frames, and Geodesic Domes (McAlester and McAlester 1984: 497). These architectural styles form the core of historic residential homes, churches, and businesses in the area and provide a basis for evaluation. 12 RESEARCH METHODS Research undertaken for the proposed telecommunications facility in Oshkosh, Wisconsin included archival and field research. The investigations were undertaken in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review Under the National Historic Preservation Act for new facilities requiring licenses from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The research methods examined the indirect (visual) Area of Potential Effect (APE) centered on the proposed facility location in accordance with the Final Rule for 47 CFR Part 1, that specifies a 0.8-kilometer (0.5-mile) radius APE for total structure height of 60.96 meters (200 feet) or less, a 1.2-kilometer (0.75-mile) radius APE for structures over 60.96 meters (200 feet) to 121.92 meters (400 feet), and a 2.4-kilometer (1.5-mile) radius APE for all structures over 121.92 meters (400 feet) in total height. The specific methods are outlined below. Archival Methods Standard archival research was undertaken prior to field investigations to identify specific cultural resource information about the project location and the surrounding area. Records examined include the National Historic Landmarks (National Park Service 2023a), National Register of Historic Places (National Park Service 2023b), records at the Wisconsin Historical Society principally in the form of the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database (WHPD), and records of the City of Oshkosh, Landmarks Commission. Archival results are provided in the results section of this document. Field Methods The field investigations, when deemed necessary, examine two distinct topics. First, the investigation examined the location where the proposed telecommunications facility would be constructed. Specifically, plans for the location of the antennas and equipment were examined to determine where they would be located and how they would directly affect the existing area. This evaluation was also extended to include proposed access and utility easements. Of particular concern were any proposed changes to existing structures and areas of ground disturbance. The second level of investigation was to document the visual APE based on previously documented structures or districts that are listed or eligible for listing on the NRHP. Given this portion of the project was focused on resources that may be affected by the proposed project, report consideration was given to the architectural setting of the facility. All resources in the visual APE were considered for effects, but this report emphasizes those resources that could either be seen from the project location or from those resources from which the antenna could be seen. Reasons for not including specific resource structure photographs include direct views to and from the proposed project to specific resources were not possible due to intervening structures or landscape topography. These resources have recommended determinations of No Adverse Effect since they are not directly affected and there is no change in the existing visual setting. Additionally, the investigation of previously identified resources within the APE was limited to those that could be photographically documented from Public rights-of-way. Each photographed resource was mapped as to its location and photo orientation was recorded on a standard photography inventory form. Each resource was mapped in relationship to the proposed telecommunications facility and additional photographs were taken to establish a structural context for the proposed facility. All of these materials were utilized in order to determine the potential effects posed by the project. 13 RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATIONS Data specific to Oshkosh, Wisconsin was collected by archival research. The results of those specific methods are detailed below. Archival Results A search of the National Historic Landmarks (National Park Service 2023a), National Register of Historic Places (National Park Service 2023b), records at the Wisconsin Historical Society principally in the form of the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database (WHPD), and records of the City of Oshkosh, Landmarks Commission identified 67 historic resources within the Area of Potential Effect (APE). Three resources identified in the APE are listed on the National Register of Historic Places as historic districts: NRHP District 1- Irving Church Historic District (NRHP #94000156; City of Oshkosh Historic District) is roughly bounded by West Irving Avenue, Franklin Street, Church Avenue, Wisconsin Street, and Amherst Avenue. The district is notable for architecture and engineering, with a period of significance extending from 1850 to 1949. It features Italianate, Queen Anne, and Greek Revival architectural styles associated with William Waters and Bell & Cole. The district was listed on 7 March 1994. NRHP District 2- North Main Street Historic District (NRHP #96000250; City of Oshkosh Historic District) is roughly bounded by North Main Street from Parkway Avenue to Algoma Boulevard, and Market Street NW to High Avenue. The district is notable for architecture and engineering, with a period of significance that extends from 1850 to 1949. It features Queen Anne and Italianate architectural styles associated with William Waters and Ephraim E. Stevens. The district was listed on 7 March 1996. NRHP District 3- Washington Avenue Neoclassical Historic District (NRHP #100000863; City of Oshkosh Historic District) includes six resources roughly bounded by the 100 and 200 blocks of Washington Avenue. The district is notable for Architecture with a period of significance from 1900 to 1949. It features Neoclassical architecture associated with Henry Auler and William Waters. The district was listed on the NRHP on 10 April 2017. Thirteen architectural resources identified in the APE are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): NRHP Resource 1- 502 North Main Street, First Methodist Church (Wagner Opera House) (NRHP #95000247; AHI #44811; Oshkosh Landmark) is a Romanesque Revival building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1874 (Auler and Jensen 1924). It was listed on the NRHP 17 March 1995. NRHP Resource 2- 234 Church Avenue, John R. Morgan House (NRHP #83004365; AHI #28146), is a Queen Anne building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1884. It was listed on the NRHP on 14 October 1983. NRHP Resource 3- 110 Church Avenue, First Presbyterian Church (NRHP #74000142; AHI #40931), is a Romanesque Revival building designed by William Holbrook and constructed circa 1893. It was listed on the NRHP 27 December 1974. 14 NRHP Resource 4- 240 Algoma Boulevard, Orville Beach Memorial Manual Training School (NRHP #85002234; AHI #27596), is a Neoclassical building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1912. It was listed on the NRHP 12 September 1985. NRHP Resource 5- 203 Algoma Boulevard, Trinity Episcopal Church (NRHP #74000145; AHI #66085), is a Richardsonian Romanesque building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1887. It was listed on the NRHP 30 December 1974. NRHP Resource 6- 100 High Avenue, Oshkosh Grand Opera House (NRHP #74000144; AHI #16515), is a Romanesque Revival building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1883. It was listed on the NRHP 21 January 1974. NRHP Resource 7- 132-140 High Street & 9 Brown Street, Frontenac Flats (NRHP #82000733; AHI #66550) is a Romanesque Revival building designed by J. T. Raycraft and constructed circa 1893. It was listed on the NRHP 22 April 1982. NRHP Resource 8- 105 Washington Avenue, Fraternal Reserve Association (NRHP #15001048; AHI #70540), is a Neoclassical building designed by Henry Auler and constructed circa 1914. It contributes to the Washington Avenue Neoclassical Historic District and was individually listed on the NRHP on 2 February 2016. NRHP Resource 9- 220 Washington Avenue, Wisconsin National Life Insurance Building (NRHP #82000737; AHI #16523) is a Neoclassical building designed by Auler, Jensen and Brown and constructed circa 1925. It was listed on the NRHP on 29 February 1982. NRHP Resource 10- 405 Washington Avenue, The Fraternal Order of Eagles (NRHP #100002140; AHI #70549) is a Tudor Revival building designed by Henry Auler and constructed circa 1927. It was listed on the NRHP on 21 February 2018. NRHP Resource 11- 415 Jackson Street, Winnebago County Court House (NRHP #82000736; AHI #70159) is an Art Deco building designed by Julius Sandstedt, Granger & Bollenbacher and constructed circa 1939. It was listed on the NRHP 23 June 1982. NRHP Resource 12- 224 State Street, Daily Northwestern Building (NRHP #82000732; AHI #70707). A Neoclassical building designed by Auler, Jensen, and Brown and constructed circa 1930. It was listed on the NRHP on 13 May 1982. NRHP Resource 13- 605, 619 Merritt Avenue, St. Mary’s Catholic Church Complex (NRHP #100006505; AHI #70120), includes the High Victorian Gothic Church building designed by A. Duiding and constructed circa 1886, the Francis Cabrini Elementary School (AHI #70397), St. Mary’s Rectory (AHI #136584), and St. Mary’s Hall (AHI #136598). The complex was listed on the NRHP on 17 May 2021. Fifty-one resources within the APE listed on the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database (WHPD) have been determined Potentially Eligible or Eligible for listing on the NRHP by the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Office: WHPD Resource 1- 18 West Lincoln Avenue (AHI #70106), A. M. Jacobsen, is a Queen Anne building constructed 1896. WHPD Resource 2- 207 East Irving Avenue (AHI #70073), Dale School, is an Italianate building designed by H. C. Koch and constructed circa 1875. WHPD Resource 3- 622 East Irving Avenue (AHI #70079), John J. Crowley, is a Queen Anne building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1905. WHPD Resource 4- 814 East Irving Avenue (AHI #70081), Herbert Manion House, is an Arts and Crafts building constructed circa 1927. WHPD Resource 5- 705 East Irving Avenue (AHI #70319) Otto Huntz House, is a Prairie Style building constructed circa 1929. 15 WHPD Resource 6- 502 East Irving Avenue (AHI #136338), Charles F. Warning House, is a Tudor Revival building constructed circa 1910. WHPD Resource 7- 222 East Parkway Avenue (AHI #70207), Helen Farnsworth Mears House, is a Cross Gabled building. WHPD Resource 8- 706 East Parkway Avenue (AHI #70209) is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1902. WHPD Resource 9- 824 East Parkway Avenue (AHI #70210), St. Paul’s Evangelical Church, is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1896. WHPD Resource 10- 824 East Parkway Avenue (AHI #70211), St. Paul’s Evangelical Rectory, is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1896. WHPD Resource 11- 138 Church Avenue (AHI #27595), First Baptist Temple, is a Richardsonian Romanesque building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1901. WHPD Resource 12- 121 Church Avenue (AHI #66747), Edwin W. Cole House, is an Italianate building designed by Edwin W. Cole and constructed circa 1884. WHPD Resource 13- 137 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66069), First Congregational Church, is a Gothic Revival building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1901. WHPD Resource 14- 429 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66099), David Campbell Residence, is an Italianate building constructed circa 1882. WHPD Resource 15- 443 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66103), First Church of Christ Scientist, is a Georgian Revival building designed by Anker Hansen and constructed circa 1923. WHPD Resource 16- 512, 516, 520 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66106) is a Spanish Colonial building. WHPD Resource 17- 530 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66120) is a Tudor Revival building designed by Auler, Jensen, & Brown and C.R. Meyer. WHPD Resource 18- 535-535A Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66123) William Bedward, is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1895. WHPD Resource 19- 545 Algoma Boulevard (AHI #66127), Sylvanus Ripley House, is an Italianate building designed by Adam E. Bell and constructed circa 1872. WHPD Resource 20- 217 High Avenue (AHI #68264) August Stille House, is a Greek Revival building constructed circa 1864. WHPD Resource 21- 226-226A High Avenue (AHI #68282; City of Oshkosh Landmark) Ebenezer James House, is an Italianate building constructed circa 1868. WHPD Resource 22- 435 High Avenue (AHI #68288), St. Peter’s Catholic Church, is a Contemporary building designed by Brielmaier & Sons and constructed circa 1954. WHPD Resource 23- 449 High Avenue fronts on Pearl Avenue (AHI #70318), St. Peter’s Catholic High School, is a Neo-Gothic building constructed circa 1913. WHPD Resource 24- 471 High Avenue (AHI #136601), St. Peter’s Convent, is a Neoclassical building constructed circa 1948. WHPD Resource 25- 449 High Avenue (AHI #136680), St. Peter’s Education Center and Parish Offices, is an Other Vernacular building constructed circa 1948. WHPD Resource 26- 435 High Avenue (AHI #136682), St. Peter’s Rectory, is a Contemporary building constructed circa 1954. WHPD Resource 27- 701-701A Merritt Avenue (AHI #70121) is a Queen Anne building. WHPD Resource 28- 303 Washington Avenue (AHI #70546), Dr. Corbett House, is a Queen Anne building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1891. WHPD Resource 29- 306 Wisconsin (AHI #70626), Twentieth Century Club, is an Italianate building constructed circa 1872. WHPD Resource 30- 309 Washington Avenue (AHI #70547) is a Spanish Colonial building. WHPD Resource 31- 549 Washington Avenue (AHI #70551) Salem Church of the Evangelical, is a Neo-Classical building constructed circa 1925. 16 WHPD Resource 32- 614 Washington Avenue (AHI #70554) Peter Stein; Carl Felker, is a Queen Anne building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1891. WHPD Resource 33- 718 Washington Avenue (AHI #70555), Harry V. Slater, is a Tudor Revival building designed by Auler, Jensen, and Brown and constructed circa 1931. WHPD Resource 34- 310 Waugoo Avenue (AHI #70631), D. C. Buckstaff, is a Queen Anne building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1884. WHPD Resource 35- 421 Waugoo Avenue (AHI #70632), Fred King House, is a Shingle style building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1891. WHPD Resource 36- 320 Otter Avenue (AHI #70702), Peter Nicolai, is an Italianate building constructed circa 1882. WHPD Resource 37- 425 Division Street (AHI #66811), Recreation Building of Vocational School, is a Romanesque Revival building constructed circa 1915. WHPD Resource 38- 420 Division Street (AHI #138325), Gas Station, is an Art Deco building constructed circa 1940. WHPD Resource 39- 808 North Main Street (AHI #70788), St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, is a Neo-Gothic Revival building designed by William Waters and constructed circa 1914. WHPD Resource 40- 448 Jefferson Street (AHI #70185) is a Neoclassical building. WHPD Resource 41- 628 Jefferson Street (AHI #135380) is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1910. WHPD Resource 42- 541 Jefferson Street (AHI #135401), Dr. Philander A. Wheeler House, is a Queen Anne building constructed circa 1890. WHPD Resource 43- 538 Mt. Vernon Street (AHI #70137) is a Queen Anne building. WHPD Resource 44- 618 Mt. Vernon Street (AHI #70139) is a Queen Anne building designed by E.E. Stevens. WHPD Resource 45- 740 Mt. Vernon Street (AHI #70149), Henry Kleinschmit House, is a Prairie Style building constructed circa 1923. WHPD Resource 46- 538 Madison Street (AHI #70715), Thomas Ryan House, is a Queen Anne building. WHPD Resource 47- 415 Broad Street (AHI #66387), Chicago & Northwestern Depot, is an Other Vernacular building constructed circa 1884. WHPD Resource 48- 441 Boyd Street (AHI #136599), St. Mary’s Parish Building, is an Other Vernacular building constructed circa 1915. WHPD Resource 49- 111 State Street (AHI #70577) is a German Renaissance Revival building. WHPD Resource 50- 219 Court Street (AHI #66796), Catherine Noyes, is a Georgian Revival building constructed circa 1915. WHPD Resource 51- 316 Court Street (AHI #66798), L.O.O.M. No. 282 Loyal Order of Moose, is a Romanesque Revival building constructed 1875. Architectural Resources The project as proposed includes the removal of coax cables and jumpers and a CDMA GPS antenna and collocation addition of three new C Band antenna-radios, three new DoD antenna-radios, and one C- Band & DoD GPS antenna adjacent to existing antennas on the penthouse of the building located at 530 North Main Street, Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin 54901. The project as proposed has a total height of 48.2 meters (158 feet). As a result, the investigation included a Direct Effects assessment of the property at this address and an Indirect Effects assessment utilizing the defined APE (Figure 2). E Irving and Church North Main Street Washington Street Neoclassical HD Oshkosh State Normal School Location 0 0.25 0.50.13 Kilometers 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles NRHP #96000250NRHP #74000142 NRHP #95000247 AHI #135401AHI #27595 AHI #66747 Figure 2. Photo Key of Recorded Architectural Resources. 17 Architectural Resource Location# NRHP Historic District Proposed Facility Location Area of Potential Effect (0.5 mile radius) KEY Aerial Photograph Obtained from ESRI World Imagery - May 2023 530 N Main Street, Oshkosh, WI 54901 Merritt Ave Washington Ave E Parkway Ave E Irving Ave N M a i n S t D i v i s i o n S t C e n t r a l S t Rt . 4 5 Je f f e r s o n S t Ch u r c h A v e Alg o m a B l v d Hig h A v e Fox Ri v e r 18 Direct Effects The project will be located on the Raulf Hotel at 530 North Main Street, Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin 54901 (Figure 3). The project as proposed includes the collocation of new C Band and DoD antennas adjacent to existing antennas on the penthouse of the building. The Raulf Hotel is listed as a Contributing building within the North Main Street NRHP Historic District (NRHP #96000250/City of Oshkosh Historic District), which is roughly bounded by West Irving Avenue, Franklin Street, Church Avenue, Wisconsin Street, and Amherst Avenue (Figure 4). As proposed, the addition of new antennas to the penthouse will only minimally change the current view of the building and the district and will not detract from the architectural or historical significance of the resource, which is notable for architecture and engineering. As a result, a finding of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for Direct Effects is recommended. Indirect Effects The proposed project has a visual APE of a 0.8-kilometer (0.5-mile) radius following the FCC determined APE for a structure with a total height of 60.96 meters (200 feet) or less. A total of 67 resources, noted above, were identified within the visual APE. Visual effects were determined by evaluating if the project as proposed would be visible in the historic viewshed of the resource; this viewshed is interpreted as what was originally intended to be seen when the resource was designed and constructed, including the resource and its immediate surroundings, when viewing the resource from the public right-of-way. Five resources were determined to be immediately visible from the proposed project. Two architectural resources identified in the APE are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): NRHP Resource 1, the First Methodist Church (Wagner Opera House) (NRHP #95000247/AHI #44811/Oshkosh Landmark), is located at 502 North Main Street (Figure 5). This resource faces west with the project to be located to the north (Figure 6). As proposed, the project will be minimally visible from the resource and will not be visible within the intended historic viewshed of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for this resource. NRHP Resource 3, the First Presbyterian Church (NRHP #74000142/AHI #40931), is located at 110 Church Avenue (Figure 7). This resource faces west with the project to be located to the north (Figure 8). As proposed, the project will be visible from the resource and will not be visible within the intended historic viewshed of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for this resource. Three resources within the APE listed on the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database (WHPD) have been determined Potentially Eligible or Eligible for listing on the NRHP by the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Office: WHPD Resource 11, the First Baptist Temple (AHI #27595), is located at 138 Church Avenue (Figure 9). This resource faces southwest with the project to be located to the east (Figure 10). As proposed, the project will be minimally visible from the resource and will not be visible within the intended historic viewshed of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for this resource. Figure 3. Project location: Raulf Hotel, 530 North Main Street. Figure 4. Project location: North Main Street NRHP Historic District (NRHP #96000250/ City of Oshkosh Historic District). 19 Figure 5. NRHP Resource 1: First Methodist Church (Wagner Opera House) (NRHP #95000247/AHI #44811/Oshkosh Landmark), 502 North Main Street. Figure 6. View to project from NRHP Resource 1. 20 Figure 7. NRHP Resource 3: First Presbyterian Church (NRHP #74000142/AHI #40931), 110 Church Avenue. Figure 8. View to project from NRHP Resource 3. 21 Figure 9. WHPD Resource 11: First Baptist Temple (AHI #27595), 138 Church Avenue. Figure 10. View to project from WHPD Resource 11. 22 23 WHPD Resource 12, the Edwin W. Cole House (AHI #66747), is located at 121 Church Avenue (Figure 11). This resource faces northeast with the project to be located to the east (Figure 12). As proposed, the project will be minimally visible from the resource and will not be visible within the intended historic viewshed of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for this resource. WHPD Resource 42, the Dr. Philander A. Wheeler House (AHI #135401), is located at 541 Jefferson Street. This resource faces east with the project to be located to the southwest (Figure 13). As proposed, the project will be visible from the resource and will not be visible within the intended historic viewshed of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for this resource. A determination of No Adverse Effect is made for all other resources in the APE as there is no significant visible change to the historic setting and feeling created by this project. As a result of this investigation and review, it is recommended that a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for visual effects be made for this project. Based on our analysis, the proposed project will not introduce any visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that will diminish the significant historic features of any Resources. Figure 11. WHPD Resource 12: Edwin W. Cole House (AHI #66747), 121 Church Avenue. Figure 12. View to project from WHPD Resource 12. 24 Figure 13. WHPD Resource 42: Dr. Philander A. Wheeler House (AHI #135401), 541 Jefferson Street and View to Project. 25 26 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Public Service Archaeology & Architecture Program conducted a review of the property where the proposed telecommunications facility will occur and of a 0.8-kilometer (0.5-mile) radius APE surrounding a proposed facility for NRHP eligible resources in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The project as proposed includes the collocation of new C Band and DoD antennas adjacent to existing antennas on the penthouse of the building, for a project with a total height of less than 60.96 meters (200 feet) located at 530 North Main Street, Oshkosh, Winnebago County, Wisconsin 54901. The project will be located on the Raulf Hotel, which is listed as a Contributing building within the North Main Street NRHP Historic District (NRHP #96000250/City of Oshkosh Historic District). The project as proposed will only minimally change the current view of the building and the district and will not detract from the architectural or historical significance of the resource, resulting in a determination of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties for architectural Direct Effects. A review of the National Historic Landmarks (National Park Service 2023a), National Register of Historic Places (National Park Service 2023b), records at the Wisconsin Historical Society principally in the form of the Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database (WHPD), and records of the City of Oshkosh, Landmarks Commission has identified 67 NRHP-eligible resources present within the defined 0.8-kilometer (0.5-mile) radius APE. As proposed, the project will not have an effect on the significance of any identified resources. A finding of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties is recommended, based on the proposed project that will be located at 530 North Main Street and will not negatively impact the historic viewsheds of any listed historic properties; project clearance for architectural cultural resource concerns is recommended. 27 CITED SOURCES Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System 2023 Center for the Study of Upper Midwest Cultures - Ethnic Groups in Wisconsin. Electronic document: https://csumc.wisc.edu, accessed 13 February 2023. Carley, Rachel 1994 The Visual Dictionary of American Domestic Architecture. Henry Holt and Company, New York, New York. City of Oshkosh 2023 City of Oshkosh, City Planning and Development List of Locally Designated Properties and Districts in the City of Oshkosh. Electronic document: http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us, accessed 22 May 2023. Lawson, Publius V. 1908 History of Winnebago County, Wisconsin. C. F. Cooper and Company, Chicago, Illinois. Longstreth, Richard 2000 The Buildings of Main Street - A Guide to American Commercial Architecture. Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, California. McAlester, Virginia and Lee McAlester 1984 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, New York National Park Service 2023a National Historic Landmarks Program. National Park Service, Washington D.C. Electronic document: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl, accessed 22 May 2023. 2023b National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service, Washington D.C. Electronic document: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nrl, accessed 22 May 2023. Randall, George A. 1889 Illustrated Atlas of Winnebago County, Wisconsin. Brant & Fuller, Madison, Wisconsin. United States Geological Survey 1992 Oshkosh, WI 7.5' Quadrangle Map. United States Geological Survey, Washington D.C. Wisconsin Historical Society 2023 Wisconsin Historic Preservation Database. Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison. Electronic Document: http://www.wisahrd.org/index, accessed on 22 May 2023. Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: And /Or 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted _______________ 18) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Additional Information 19) Information on local government’s role or interest (optional): City of Oshkosh Planning Division To Whom It May Concern 215 Church Ave Room 204 Oshkosh WI 54903 (920)236-5055 MLyons@ci.oshkosh.wi.us 04/24/2023 05/16/2023 X X The Oshkosh Landmark's Commission would like to become a consulting party in the historic review process. A copy of the 621 form will be provided via email. 24 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014 624 Water Street Prairie du Sac, WI 53578 608.644.1449 phone 608.644.1549 fax 1 of 2 April 24, 2023 City of Oshkosh Planning Division Attn: Mark Lyons, Planning Services Manager 215 Church Avenue, Rm 204 Oshkosh, WI 54903 Phone: 920.236.5055 Email: MLyons@ci.oshkosh.wi.us SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTICE POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES U.S. CELLULAR / OSHKOSH DT (776305) To Whom It May Concern: I am writing on behalf of U.S. Cellular Corporation ("U.S. Cellular") and the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), regarding a proposed wireless telecommunications collocation in the City of Oshkosh, Wisconsin. In order to provide new coverage/enhanced coverage, U.S. Cellular proposes to install additional telecommunications antennas upon the existing rooftop building installation located at 530 N. Main Street in the City of Oshkosh. U.S. Cellular currently has existing antennas on this structure. Approximate coordinates for the subject structure: 44-01-13.50N, 88-32-14.80W. I have enclosed for your review documents that describe the location of this project, including a USGS Quadrangle map, aerial site plan, and photographs of the existing structure proposed for collocation. U.S. Cellular is reaching out to invite your organization to participate and provide input in the federally mandated review of potential effects the proposed collocation could have on historic properties. This review is conducted by U.S. Cellular under the oversight of the FCC and includes input from the State Historic Preservation Officer (“SHPO”), interested federally recognized Tribes, and the public. The focus of this review is twofold: (1) identify whether or not any historic properties may exist in the area of this project; and (2) if so, whether the project may cause any effects to such properties. If your organization wishes to participate in this historic review process, it is entitled to be a consulting party as envisioned by the National Historic Preservation Act. As a consulting party your organization would be provided with copies of all documents and submissions made to the SHPO, be notified of developments in the historic review process, be entitled to consult and comment on the identification of historic properties in the designated area of potential effects (“APE”), provide input on any potential effects to historic properties, and the resolution of any adverse effects. Your participation would bring an additional perspective to the process. If you choose to reply to this request, please let me know no later than May 26, 2023: 1) if your organization wishes to become a consulting party or 2.) if you do not wish to become a 2 of 2 consulting party. If you chose not to become a consulting party your comments regarding historic properties are still welcome and I encourage you to reply by the date listed above. If I do not receive a reply by the date above, I will assume you are not interested in participating in this review, although you may request consultation at any time during the active review process. Please send correspondence/contact: Jake Rieb, Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc. 624 Water Street, Prairie du Sac, WI 53578 or jrieb@edgeconsult.com. In addition, please feel free to call me at 608.644.1449 if you have any questions or would like further information about this particular project or historic review process. I thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and your attention to this matter. Sincerely and respectfully, Jake Rieb Archaeologist & Compliance Specialist Edge Consulting Engineers, Inc. Receipt Print Date: Apr 24, 2023 RETURN TO REFERENCE Jessica Moy Ship Date: Apr 24, 2023 624 WATER STREET Ship from ZIP: 53578 PRAIRIE DU SAC, WI 53578 Weight: 0 lbs. 2 oz. User: Edge624 SHIP TO Cost Code: <None> CITY OF OSHKOSH PLANNING SERVICES Refund Type: Mail-in 215 CHURCH AVE RM 204 Reference #: 37397 OSHKOSH, WI 54901 US Printed on: Shipping label Tracking #: 00040206203518564454 SERVICE UNIT PRICE First Class ® Large Envelope/Flat $1.50 Tracking $0.00 Insurance (N/A) Subtotal $1.50 Label Quantity 1 Total Cost $1.50 Page 1 of 1Stamps Print Receipt 4/24/2023https://or.stamps.com/PostageTools/PrintReceipt.aspx?postageId=52931360529&carrierA... 1 Jessica Moy From:Jake Rieb Sent:Tuesday, June 13, 2023 8:55 AM To:Shirley BrabenderMattox Cc:Jessica Moy Subject:RE: Oshkosh Installation 530 N Main Attachments:Oshkosh_DT_(776305)_C-Band_DoD_Addition_Drawings_2023-06-09.pdf Categories:Tribal Shirley, Thank you for following up. I checked this morning and YES we have drawings recently completed for the proposed installation/upgrade. I selected the applicable pages and attached for your review. Hopefully this will be enough information for the commission to comment. That said, my colleague, Jessica Moy (cc’d), will also soon send out a larger packet with additional Section 106 review project information. She is still waiting for an architectural historian’s study that considers potential visual impacts. Once that report arrives (maybe another week?) she will compile the packet (FCC 621 Form) and get it sent out to you, the Wisconsin SHPO, and other consulting parties. The majority of the additional information will likely not be of much interest to you. I’d think you are most interested in the what is already attached here. But you will likely also have interest in the visual impact study. Finally, the requested 30 day timeline for comment won’t start until you receive the full packet from Jessica. Here is a written summary from my own reading of the attached drawings: Removal of 4x coax cables and associated jumpers Removal of 1x CDMA GPS antenna Addition of 3x C‐Band antenna‐radios Addition of 3x DoD antenna‐radios Addition of 1x C‐Band & DoD GPS antenna Ancillary equipment includes addition of 1x Raycap SPD with associated hybrid cable (within penthouse) Two of the existing antenna sectors (Beta, Gamma) are located on the rooftop penthouse sidewalls. The third sector (Alpha) is located on the exterior north parapet wall. There are existing antennas in all these locations. The proposed antennas would be in immediate proximity to existing as best illustrated by pages T201 and T501 of the drawings. Sincerely, Jake Rieb, MA, RPA 624 Water Street Prairie du Sac, WI 53578 https://edgeconsult.com/ Office: 608‐644‐1449, Ext. 308 Cell: 608‐234‐2896 2 From: Shirley BrabenderMattox <shirleybrabendermattox@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 3:36 AM To: Jake Rieb <jrieb@edgeconsult.com> Subject: Re: Oshkosh Installation 530 N Main Good morning, Jake, I am wondering whether there has been any further development for the U.S. Cellular / Oshkosh DT (776305)? The Landmarks Commission is meeting this Wednesday. Can you counsel me on where we are in the process? I would like to make sure that the LAndmarks Commission's reply and comments will be included with the Section 106 Review. However, we have not seen anything to date. I have sent an email to the Building/Inspections Department to see if a building permit was submitted on behalf of US Cellular. Thank you for any assistance you can provide. Cheers, Shirley Brabender Mattox Landmarks Commission On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:38 PM Jake Rieb <jrieb@edgeconsult.com> wrote: No worries on the May 26th deadline. That was intended for a response of interest (or presumed lack of interest if no response). Now that I know you are interested, we can/should wait until we have the information you need to properly review the proposal. I’m not sure if this is helpful but I also want to clarify we (Edge Consulting) are working as a consultant for the applicant (US Cellular). Our involvement is in regard to engineering and Section 106 review only. We aren’t the consultant that would (or maybe already has?) submit a building permit application with the city. There might be another party involved for that side of things! Sincerely,  Jake Rieb From: Shirley BrabenderMattox <shirleybrabendermattox@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 3:29 PM To: Jake Rieb <jrieb@edgeconsult.com> Subject: Re: Oshkosh Installation 530 N Main 3 Hello, Jake, Thank you for your speedy reply. I was concerned that the Landmarks Commission would not be able to meet your deadline of May 26 for their letter of response. Will you extend the deadline until we can review the drawings? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Shirley Brabender Mattox Oshkosh Landmarks Commission, Chair On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:19 PM Jake Rieb <jrieb@edgeconsult.com> wrote: Shirley, I forwarded your original request to the project engineering team. They have not gotten back to me yet. It doesn’t appear the specifics of the design will be available until June. I think we might need to request you table the discussion of this proposal one until I can get you the drawings for review. I can say at this point it will be in the immediate vicinity of the existing US Cellular antennas on the structure, and may possibly be re‐using some of the existing mounts from previous antennas. But I don’t know quantity of antennas or the exact locations yet. Sincerely, Jake Rieb, MA, RPA 624 Water Street Prairie du Sac, WI 53578 https://edgeconsult.com/ 4 Office: 608‐644‐1449, Ext. 308 Cell: 608‐234‐2896 From: Shirley BrabenderMattox <shirleybrabendermattox@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 1:29 PM To: Jake Rieb <jrieb@edgeconsult.com> Subject: Oshkosh Installation 530 N Main Hello, Jake, This is my 2nd email request (May 11 1st communication) for specifics related to your proposed US Cellular Communication telecommunication installation on the Raulf Place, 530 N Main Street, Oshkosh. You have described the building site, Raulf Place, of your proposed installation project. However, the Landmarks Commission could not respond at this time. More specific information is needed for a response. They request the description, size, height, width, color, and the exact placement of your installation on the building. Please forward a schematic showing the placement locations ASAP. Thank you for providing the necessary information. Sincerely, Shirley Brabender Mattox Landmarks Commission, chairman Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? ( ) Yes ( ) No Consulting Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Contact Name 4) First Name: 5) MI: 6) Last Name: 7) Suffix: 8) Title: Contact Information 9) P.O. Box: And /Or 10) Street Address: 11) City: 12) State: 13) Zip Code: 14) Telephone Number: 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 18) Date Contacted _______________ 19) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties’ role or interest (optional): X City of Oshkosh To Whom It May Concern PO BOX 1130 Oshkosh WI 54903 (920)236-5000 na@na.com X 04/24/2023 X 25 of 28 FCC Form 621 May 2014