HomeMy WebLinkAbout27A. 22-475NOVEMBER 9, 2022 22-475 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WEST
HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELD AT 375 NORTH EAGLE
STREET
INITIATED BY: OSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/ findings and conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan for improvements to the West High School athletic field
located at 375 North Eagle Street, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-
387 of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for
improvements to the West High School athletic field located at 375 North Eagle Street,
per the attached, is hereby approved with the following findings:
1. The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall
purpose and intent of this Chapter.
2. The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land
use impacts in the environs of the subject site.
3. Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the
range of uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including
but not limited to public sewer and water and public roads.
4. The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned
Development project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
5. The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits
in terms of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to
addressing development performance that relate to and more than
NOVEMBER 9, 2022 22-475 RESOLUTION
CONT’D
compensate for any requested exceptions/base standard modifications
variation of any standard or regulation of this Chapter.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following are conditions of approval for a
General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for improvements to the
West High School athletic field located at 375 North Eagle Street:
1. BSM to allow 30-foot tall accessory structure (press box), where code allows a
maximum accessory structure height of 18 feet.
2. BSM to allow 70-foot tall light poles, where code allows a maximum light
fixture height of 20 feet.
3. A minimum of 250 street frontage landscaping points devoted to tall/medium
trees shall be provided along North Westfield Street.
4. Final landscaping plan to be approved by the Department of Community
Development.
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons, Planning Services Manager
DATE: November 3, 2022
RE: Approve General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for
Improvements to the West High School Athletic Field at 375 North Eagle Street
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval of a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan for improvements to the Oshkosh West High School athletic field located at 375 North Eagle
Street. The subject site is Oshkosh West High School, which is 40.17 acres and includes the
school, athletic facilities and parking areas. The site is bounded by Taft Avenue, North Eagle
Street, Southland Avenue, and North Westfield Street and is zoned Institutional District (I). The
surrounding area consists primarily of residential uses along with park area to the north. The
2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends Community Facility use for the subject site.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to install synthetic turf on the existing sports field used for
freshman/JV football games and JV/varsity soccer games, which is located inside the track used
for middle and high school track meets. The project also includes new lighting for the field and
a new press box. The proposed plans were discussed at a Plan Commission workshop on
September 6, 2022, with Plan Commission voicing support.
No changes are being proposed to the location of the sports field and the applicant has noted
that seating capacity for the facility will not change. The submittal includes plans for the new
press box, which will exceed the maximum height for an accessory structure of 18’ with an
overall height of 30’. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the increased height as it is needed to
provide visibility of the field. Staff is recommending that street frontage landscaping be
provided to offset the requested BSM.
The applicant is also proposing the installation of four 70-foot tall poles to provide lighting for
the field. This is well in excess of the 20 feet permitted in the Institutional District and will
require a BSM. The proposed light poles/fixtures are consistent with lighting recently approved
for North High School’s football/soccer field, which included taller light poles (70’). This is
intended to take advantage of the more focused light and illuminate more directly on the playing
surface than shorter light poles, reducing the amount of light spillage onto adjacent areas. For
this reason, staff is supportive of the BSM to allow for the proposed 70-foot tall poles. Staff is
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
recommending the BSM be offset with a minimum of 250 tall/medium tree street frontage
landscaping points along North Westfield Street to help to mitigate the visual impact of the
increased light fixture height.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this project would not result in an increase in the assessed property value as the
property is exempt. The applicant is anticipating spending approximately $2.2 million on the
project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan with findings and conditions on November 1, 2022. Please see the attached
staff report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved:
Mark Lyons Mark A. Rohloff
Planning Services Manager City Manager
ITEM: ZONE CHANGE FROM INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (I) TO
INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
(I-PD) AND APPROVAL OF A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 375 N EAGLE
STREET
Plan Commission meeting of October 18, 2022.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner/Applicant: Oshkosh Area School District
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Institutional District (I) to Institutional
District with a Planned Development Overlay (I-PD). The applicant also requests approval of
General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for improvements to the West High
School athletic field, at 375 N. Eagle Street.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Zoning map amendment standards are found in Section 30-381 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Background Information:
The subject site is Oshkosh West High School, which is 40.17 acres and includes athletic facilities
and parking areas. The site is bounded by Taft Ave., N. Eagle St., Southland Ave., and N.
Westfield St., and is zoned Institutional District (I). The surrounding area consists primarily of
residential uses along with park area to the north. The 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
recommends Community Facility use for the subject site.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use Zoning
School I
Recognized Neighborhood Organizations
None
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 2
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing Uses Zoning
North Park I
South Residential I
East Residential, institutional, & commercial I & SR-5
West Residential & commercial SR-5, DR-6, MR-20, & SMU
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
2040 Comprehensive Land Use Recommendation Community Facility
ANALYSIS
Zone Change
The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a Planned Development Overlay for the subject
property. This request is intended to provide some flexibility to the zoning ordinance to
accommodate site improvements including new lighting for the athletic field. The applicant has
submitted plans for the athletic facility upgrade, which will be addressed as General
Development Plan (GDP) and Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) review to follow. Staff is
supportive of the proposed rezone as it will assist in providing needed improvements for the site.
Rezone to I-PD
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 3
Use/Site Design
The applicant is proposing to install synthetic turf on the existing sports field used for
freshman/JV football games and JV/varsity soccer games, which is located inside the track used
for middle and high school track meets. The project also includes new lighting for the field and a
new press box. The proposed plans were discussed at a Plan Commission workshop on
September 6, 2022, with Plan Commission voicing support.
Site plan
No changes are being proposed to the location of the sports field and the applicant has noted that
seating capacity for the facility will not change. The submittal includes plans for the new press
box, which will be 8’ deep, 33’ long, and have a 29’ setback from the N. Westfield St. right-of-way
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 4
line, meeting the 25’ setback requirement. The press box will have on overall height of 30’,
exceeding the maximum height for an accessory structure of 18’. Staff is supportive of a BSM to
allow the increased height as it is needed to provide visibility of the field. Staff is recommending
that street frontage landscaping be provided to offset the requested BSM.
Press box
Signage
This request does not include any additional signage.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 5
Site Lighting
The applicant is proposing the installation of four 70-foot tall poles (two on each side of the field)
to provide lighting for the field. This is well in excess of the 20 feet permitted in the I District and
will require a BSM. The proposed light poles/fixtures are consistent with lighting recently
approved for North High School’s football/soccer field, which included taller light poles (70’).
This is intended to take advantage of the more focused light and illuminate more directly on the
playing surface than shorter light poles, reducing the amount of light spillage onto adjacent areas.
For this, staff is in support of the BSM to allow for the proposed 70-foot tall poles. Staff is
recommending this BSM be offset with a minimum of 250 tall/medium tree street frontage
landscaping points along N. Westfield St., which will help to mitigate the visual impact of the
increased light fixture height.
The applicant has submitted a photometric plan and the maximum brightness at the west
property line along N. Westfield St. is 0.9 foot-candles, lower than the maximum 1.0 foot-candle
code requirement.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 6
Photometric lighting plan
Landscaping
A landscape plan was not included with the submittal. The landscaping ordinance does not
require additional landscaping as no additional building or pavement area is being proposed.
As previously noted, staff is recommending the applicant provide 250 tall/medium tree
landscaping points to offset the requested BSM for increased light fixture and accessory structure
height.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
Storm water management plans have been not been provided. Finalized storm water
management plans will need to be submitted and approved as part of the Site Plan Review
processes.
Building Facades
No changes are being proposed to the existing building facades.
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Zoning Map
amendment, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the
criteria established by Chapter 30-381 (D)(2):
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 7
(a) Advances the purposes of this Chapter as outlined in Section 30-03 and the
applicable rules of Wisconsin Department of Administration and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
(b) Is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
(c) Maintains the desired overall consistency of land uses, land use intensities, and
land use impacts within the pertinent zoning districts.
(d) Addresses any of the following factors that are not properly addressed on the
current Official Zoning Map:
(ii) Factors have changed (such as new data, infrastructure, market conditions,
development, annexation, or other zoning changes), making the subject
property more appropriate for a different zoning district.
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned
Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based
on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose and
intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to determine
such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired relationships
between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts in the environs
of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and adequate
buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
Staff recommends approval of the Rezone, General Development Plan, and Specific
Implementation Plan with the findings listed above and the following conditions:
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 8
1. BSM to allow 30-foot tall accessory structure (press box), where code allows a maximum
accessory structure height of 18 feet.
2. BSM to allow 70-foot tall light poles, where code allows a maximum light fixture height of
20 feet.
3. A minimum of 250 street frontage landscaping points devoted to tall/medium trees shall
be provided along N. Westfield St.
4. Final landscaping plan to be approved by the Department of Community Development.
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the rezone, General Development Plan, and
Specific Implementation Plan on October 18, 2022. The following is their discussion on the item.
Site Inspections Report: Ms. Propp, Ms. Davey, Mr. Kiefer, Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Scheuermann
reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Institutional District (I) to Institutional
District with a Planned Development Overlay (I-PD). The applicant also requests approval of
General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for improvements to the West High
School athletic field, at 375 N. Eagle Street.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a
Planned Development Overlay for the subject property. This request is intended to provide some
flexibility to the zoning ordinance to accommodate site improvements including new lighting for
the athletic field.
The applicant has submitted plans for the athletic facility upgrade, which will be addressed as
General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) review to follow. Staff
is supportive of the proposed rezone as it will assist in providing needed improvements for the
site. The applicant is proposing to install synthetic turf on the existing sports field used for
freshman/JV football games and JV/varsity soccer games, which is located inside the track used
for middle and high school track meets. The project also includes new lighting for the field and a
new press box. The proposed plans were discussed at a Plan Commission workshop on
September 6, 2022, with Plan Commission voicing support.
No changes are being proposed to the location of the sports field and the applicant has noted that
seating capacity for the facility will not change. The submittal includes plans for the new press
box, which will be 8’ deep, 33’ long, and have a 29’ setback from the N. Westfield St. right-of-way
line, meeting the 25’ setback requirement. The press box will have on overall height of 30’,
exceeding the maximum height for an accessory structure of 18’. Staff is supportive of a BSM to
allow the increased height as it is needed to provide visibility of the field. Staff is recommending
that street frontage landscaping be provided to offset the requested BSM. Staff recommends
approval with the findings and conditions as stated in the staff report.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 9
Mr. Perry opened up technical questions to staff.
Ms. Propp asked how many trees is equal to 250 landscaping points.
Mr. Slusarek said it depends on the species – if they use tall deciduous trees, it would be about 5.
If they use medium trees, it would be more.
Ms. Propp asked if it would go along the entire length of the athletic field.
Mr. Slusarek said it would be in the vicinity of the football field. They would help screen the new
poles.
Mr. Lyons said the number is consistent with the Oshkosh North request.
Mr. Mitchell said the GDP requires a landscape plan and then the SIP process requires a
formalized landscape plan. He said that he thought it wasn’t being required was because city staff
decided to waive it.
Mr. Lyons said per the applicability section of the landscape code, there is no required
landscaping for this project. Nothing in the code triggers anything that says they must add
landscaping. The planned development overlay gives staff the ability to waive filing
requirements. It has always been the process for the city to waive filing requirements for things
that have no applicability. We don’t make applicants provide a blank plan. Requiring a
landscaping plan that shows no landscaping doesn’t provide any benefit and is an extra cost to
the applicant.
Mr. Mitchell asked if because the ordinance says they have to have a landscaping plan, but since
this project doesn’t require landscaping, that’s why there isn’t one.
Mr. Lyons confirmed that is correct.
Mr. Perry asked for any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any
statements.
Jim Fochs, 375 N. Eagle St, said this is a similar concept the school district is bringing over from
North High School that was just finished. They are having difficulty getting spring sports started,
and with the development of Vel Phillips they have lost one athletic field. That is the driver
behind going from natural turf to synthetic turf in this area and adding the lights to try and
stretch out the evening and stack additional programs.
Ms. Propp asked if the Plan Commission were to ask for more landscaping if that would be
acceptable.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 10
Mr. Fochs said that in speaking with the athletic director with regards to the space along
Westfield. That is the only green space they have to use for tents and staging for track and special
events. Adding anything to that area will be a concern for them.
Ms. Propp asked if the activities bump right up to the fence.
Mr. Fochs said it depends on the size of the meet. It’s the only area that can be used as a flex
space. They are willing to go with taller or medium sized trees and they are curious to see what
the forestry department could come up with for terrace trees.
There were no other public comments on this item.
Mr. Perry closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
There were no closing statements from the applicant.
Motion by Propp to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Seconded by Kiefer.
Mr. Perry asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Mr. Mitchell said his main concern is the back of the shed being placed higher than the code
requires. It’s not surprising that there are no neighbors in the meeting due to those residents
being rentals and notices don’t go out to the tenants. The interest in this is trying to conceal that
press box as much as possible. The space behind the press box would be a space to put in six
evergreen trees which would be 240 points. A handful of trees could be planted and spaced out
for tents and other events. The ideal landscaping points would be closer to 540 points which
would be six shade trees and six arborvitae to help conceal the press box.
Ms. Davey said that with the images provided by similar facilities and what they were able to do
with their landscaping. It would be nice to see a row of trees along there but doesn’t know how it
gets in the way of having tents.
Mr. Loewenstein said that it’s difficult to put up tents underneath trees.
Mr. Kiefer said it seems like there is adequate space between the fence and the terrace. Putting
landscaping along that area would be a nice addition to the area.
Council Member Ford invited the applicant to answer some more questions.
Council Member Ford asked Mr. Fochs how he would feel about adding arborvitae behind the
press box.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 11
Mr. Fochs said he understands the thought process and will check into that option. There is some
electrical behind there so they will have to look at that. The concern would be with larger shade
trees is a wide canopy next to the press box.
Mr. Perry asked if the school district has any plans to use the space behind the press box for their
mascot or another identifier.
Mr. Fochs said there is not.
Mr. Perry said that if they had, then the arborvitae would conceal it and it would be pointless.
Ms. Scheuermann asked if they are going to use that space for advertisement.
Mr. Fochs said it will look almost identical to Oshkosh North’s press box. It shouldn’t detract
from the structure but will complete it.
Mr. Loewenstein said that using the terrace is a good solution, but they are not sure what the city
forester would do. Is there something that Plan Commission could require of the forester to do
with the terrace.
Mr. Slusarek said the city forester would be able to plant in the terrace depending on what was
done on the private side. They would like to complement what will be there.
Mr. Lyons said that through this planned development, the Plan Commission could not require
the city forester to put in plantings, but they did agree there should be some.
Mr. Mitchell asked if there is a way to quantify the 540 points, which equals x number of
arborvitae and the remainder could be subtracted from what the forestry determines is possible
along the terrace.
Mr. Lyons said that if they leave the condition that final landscape plan approved by community
development, it gives some flexibility. We need to have an enforceable condition, so leaving out
any subjectivity.
Ms. Propp asked what doubling the amount of landscaping would do.
Mr. Lyons said that if six trees were done as tall evergreens, those are 40 points each which would
equate to a dozen shade trees if those were the chosen species.
Mr. Gierach said that in the 1960’s, the school district and the city were one entity. There are
public storm sewers not in an easement on school district property outside of the right of way,
behind where the press box is located. Adding significant amount of landscaping would not be
beneficial to the utility long term. This doesn’t prohibit anything being planted, but could limit.
ITEM I: Rezone & GDP/SIP 375 N. Westfield St.. 12
Mr. Mitchell said that data should’ve been in the staff report and if it changes anything in their
plan.
Mr. Lyons said it doesn’t impact their current plan. Planting trees to the north and the south
where there is more room would be a better option than behind the press box.
Ms. Davey asked if there are no utilities between the storm sewer and the street.
Mr. Lyons said there are no public utilities, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t any private
utilities. He asked Mr. Mitchell if he was okay with the trees being to the north and the south of
the press box.
Mr. Mitchell said yes.
Motion by made by Mitchell to amend the landscaping condition to include 540 landscaping points with
six evergreen trees in proximity to the press box with subject to utility locations.
Seconded by Davey.
Mr. Perry asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Ms. Scheuermann asked Mr. Mitchell’s idea was to shade the press box and if that would even be
accomplished with trees to the north and the south.
Mr. Mitchell said that ideally the trees would have the press box shielded from all of the
residents, but since that’s not possible, it could still benefit other residents.
Motion to amend lost 4-5 (nay Kiefer, Propp, Scheuermann, Loewenstein, Perry)
Motion carried 8-1 (Nay Mitchell)
SUBMIT TO: Ge City of Oshkosh Application Dept. of Community Development 215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1130 Citys . 1 Oshkosh, Wi in 54903-1130 Cneosh Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) EHORIE: Oo dos unr
**PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK**
APPLICANT INFORMATION .
Petitioner: Oprhkeo b Oree School Orotr ic ¢ Date: PAW €2
Petitioner's Address: S 7S i nw. Fagh oF: City: Gshk Lab StateZa2E zip: S Y 902. s Aoohkooh. Telephone #: (VA) SAY = L485 emai: Pee Pose Contact preference: Phone p@l Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): eQwner (ens O a Oc Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required): ‘Grom F one Date: & AOA a
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s}: Sa me he bbove Date: 2/22
Owner(s} Address: City: State: Zip:
Telephone #: ( ) Email: Contact preference: Ol Phone O Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): (Individual (Trust (Partnership Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required) By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may. in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary fo process this application. | also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Co —sa incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: Aa~ 7 Date: BYOLLI2
ZONING AND DEVELOP. INFORMATION
Address/Location of Rezoning Request:
Tax Parcel Number(s}: 16 Os FAO { 00
Rezone property from: +ptrmel to Tnshiution ah WY PL anne h& Qeve Lapmewq- Ovaha Purpose for Rezoning: 7
Describe existing property development and land use: la durat if. La 4 ‘ol
Describe proposed development and/or proposed land use: Syath edie Torg fowtie. UW hit td
worth Ligh trig
Proposed time schedule for development! and/or use of the property: unt - Seplemba 2023
Zoning Adjacent to the Site: north: Monae be UI eield
South: TFennip Cawtd
East; _SACOCLE Fie Dol
West: Cesidendial
Sign. Staff Date Rec'd
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - Must accompany the application to be complete. (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy)
Map of the immediate area showing property involved. Area to be rezoned must be outlined in color Asite plan drawn to readable scale showing present status of property and proposed development
Street address, adjacent streets, intersections and any other information or landmarks to help identify the property
Location of existing uses, structures, fences and signs and location of proposed uses, structures, fences and signs
Anarrative statement explaining the zone change and discussion of the project ooood > Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable fo City of Oshkosh. >* Please refer fo the fee schedule for appropriate fee, FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
SUMMARY OF PROCESS
The City of Oshkosh Plan Commission and Common Council act on all amendments to the Official Zoning Map.
The petitioner or owner should be present at both the Plan Commission and Common Council meetings to
discuss and answer questions regarding the request.
The application package is reviewed by Planning Services staff to determine conformance with adopted city
plans, zoning requirements and development standards. A staff recommendation is prepared for consideration
by the Plan Commission and Common Council. The petitioner will be provided with a copy of the staff report
and meeting notice several days prior to the Plan Commission meeting. The staff report and meeting notice will
also be available on the City's website. No notice is sent fo the petitioner or owner regarding the Common
Council's consideration of the request. Petitioners and owners are encouraged to contact Planning Services
staff to find out when the request will be sent to the Common Council for review.
Neighborhood opinion is an important factor in the decision-making process. If the proposed development is
expected to have significant impact on other properties, the petitioner may be required to conduct a
neighborhood meeting to solicit public input prior to action by the Plan Commission and City Council. Planning
Services staff is available to offer assistance in compiling a mailing list for the neighborhood meeting. If deemed
appropriate, notification by mail informing the property owners within 100 feet of the subject property of the
proposal may substitute for the public meeting. Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting
property owners regarding your request.
Within 90 days of filing a complete application, Plan Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the
request. Within 60 days of the public hearing, the Plan Commission may make a written report to the Common
Council with recommendations regarding the proposal. The Plan Commission's report is advisory only. The
Common Council will make the final decision regarding all zone change requests. The Plan Commission may lay
over requests to subsequent meetings if incomplete information is provided or additional questions or concerns
are raised at the meeting.
After the Plan Commission makes its recommendation, the request will be forwarded to the Common Council for
consideration. This generally occurs three weeks after the Plan Commission meeting depending on the date the
Council meeting is scheduled (the Council meets on the 2"¢ and 4'" Tuesday of every month) and on the
availability of a legal description for the zone change. Wisconsin State Statutes require a zone change to be
published as Class ll notice in the local newspaper, the City takes care of this publication requirement prior to
the Council meeting.
The Common Council may approve the Official Zoning Map amendment as originally proposed, may approve
the proposed amendment with modifications, or may deny approval of the proposed amendment. If the
Official Zoning Map amendment is approved, the Ordinance is published in the newspaper on the following
Saturday and will be effective on Sunday. City administrative offices are notified of the effective date of the
Ordinance and will make changes to the Official Zoning Map accordingly.
For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm nN
SUBMIT TO:
City of Oshkosh aeCHGH Ate, ea - Planned Development Application — "=", "! 501 Oshkosh PHONE: (920) 236-5059
For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan
**PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK**
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: Oshkooh Brea Schack DypotricA Date: S/1e/22
Petitioner's Address: S7S We. L£agl. Sx oy. State LZ lip: SYGO2 Je Ss &) ee % james . Foe Telephone #: (9AQ_YGAY- OZ S Email: £12.42). va Contact preference: O Phone {Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): C7 a O Tenant o Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required): oa — Er Date: PL1O4 PQ
_—_—
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s):__ —Game Dr Above Date: B40/ 22
Owner(s) Address: City: State: Zip:
Telephone #: ( ) Email: Contact preference: Oi Phone O Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): Olndividual OTrust O Partnership 0 Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. | also understand that all
meeting dates are tentative and may bi stponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other
administrative reasons. xy
Property Owner's Signature: ~ i Date: E7O/ 72
TYPE OF REQUEST:
O General Development Plan (GDP) O General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment O Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) O Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment
SITE INFORMATION
Address/Location of Proposed Project: se. -aoh, Ye Ell zastel) Proposed Project Type:
Estimated Cost: L ,OPO
Current Use of Property: Oth letrc Field Zoning: x
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: Sarse ba Ly Fie IA
South: Fennla Cawtd
East: _~Gecoe FP ebd
West: (Cesid entra
> Itisrecommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. =
> Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. > Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please visit the City’s website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm
Sign. Staff Date Rec'd
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS — Must accompany the application to be complete.
(Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy) The following information must be provided in order for the application to be considered complete and able to be scheduled for Plan Commission Review. Please use the checklist below to determine the required information to be submitted at the time of application. If all information below cannot be provided at the time of application, please request a waiver in writing to the Division's Director or designee.
Q AGeneral Development Plan (GDP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(4), shall include the following items (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy):
Q General location map of the subject site depicting:
e — Alllands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject property.
e Current zoning of the subject site and abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control.
e Agraphic scale and north arrow.
Q Generalized site plan showing the pattern or proposed land uses, including:
e General size, shape, and arrangement of lots and specific use areas.
e Basic street pattern and pattern of internal drives.
e General site grading plan showing preliminary road grades.
e Basic storm drainage pattern, including proposed on-site stormwater detention.
e General location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space.
Q_ Statistical data, including:
e Minimum lot sizes in the development.
e Approximate areas of all lots.
e Density/intensity of various parts of the development.
e Building coverage.
e Landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses.
e Expected staging.
Conceptual landscaping plan.
General signage plan.
General outline of property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions.
Awritten description of the proposed Planned Development, including:
e General project themes and images.
e The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses,
e Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities.
e General treatment of natural features.
e oooo General relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other area plans.
e Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
Q_ Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee.
QA Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(5), shall include the following items. Note that the area included in an SIP may be only a portion of the area included in a previously approved GDP (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy): Q_ An existing conditions map of the subject site depicting the following:
e Alllands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject site.
e Current zoning of the subject property and all abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control.
e Existing utilities and recorded easements.
All lot dimensions of the subject site
e Agraphic scale and a north arrow.
Qa An SIP map of the proposed site showing at least the following:
« Lot layout and the arrangements of buildings.
« Public and private roads, driveways, walkways, and parking facilities.
¢ Specific treatment and location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space.
Q Proposed grading plan.
Q = Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location, species, and installation size of
plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species.
a. Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi-family structures, or building clusters, other than
conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor
area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings.
Q_ Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems, stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and
walkways.
Q_ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs,
and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common
practices.
Q_ Specific written description of the proposed SIP including:
e Specific project themes and images.
e Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses.
e Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre,
and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity. e Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland.
e Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
e Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots
and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and
landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by
Plan Commission.
e« Astatement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shalll list the standard
zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion, would inhibit the development project and the
opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project.
« Acomplete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s)
in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur.
e Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended.
Q Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the
development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common
open areas and amenities.
Q Awritten description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all
differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP.
| hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are included with this
application. | am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result in denial or
delay of the application request.
Date: & (OY aa
Applicant's Signature (required):
West High School Turf Project
August 11, 2022
Planning Commission Members,
In an effort to continue to meet the needs of our school and community, Oshkosh West High School will
be replacing its current football field, located inside the track, with an artificial turf surface. As part of
this update, the area will also be equipped with an outdoor lighting system. The project will likely
require a modification to our zoning to accommodate the height of the Musco light poles. The updates
are expected to be completed by October, 2023. The impact of this field enhancement to our
neighborhood will be minimal. Seating capacity will remain the same (approximately 308). As such the
field will not be used for varsity football competitions. Instead, the area will continue to be primarily
used for freshman and junior varsity football competition, JV and potentially varsity soccer games, and
middle and high school track meets. Evening activities will be limited and all Oshkosh city ordinances will
be followed.
Thank you,
Jim Fochs
Oshkosh Area School District
Director of Building and Grounds
ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTS
OSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOL
08.01.2022
N
4941 Kirschling Drive
Stevens Point, WI 54481
715.344.9999(Ph)715.344.9922(Fx)
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
Engineering
Point Beginningof
REZONE/GDP/SIP
375 N EAGLE ST
PC: 10/18/2022
DIANE M CUDAHY
1505 SOUTHLAND AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
BETHEL HOME INC
225 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
CARMEL RESIDENCE INC
220 N WESTFIELD ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
DONALD A BLANEY/KATHLEEN A
FLANAGAN
267 N WESTFIELD ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
LINDA A OTT
1521 SOUTHLAND AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
REED/REBECCA SAVKA
1535 TAFT AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
CITY OF OSHKOSH
PO BOX 1130
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
MICHAEL J MCCLONE
PO BOX 389
MENASHA, WI 54952
CHARLES A/MARILYN J PERRY
LIVING TRUST
1360 GREENWAY TER
ELM GROVE, WI 53122
IMMANUEL LUTHERN CHURCH
330 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
MATTHEW D GOLDTHWAITE
320 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
AHMADIYYA MOVEMENT IN
ISLAM INC
300 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
JODI L STANG
1527 RUSH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
JULIE A DOWNS
438 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
TRENT ILK/BROOKE HARKINS
430 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
SHAVON T ROBERTSON
424 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
TRAVIS J HORTON
420 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
OPTIONS IN HOUSING INC
1007 E GLENDALE AVE
APPLETON, WI 54911
VICTOR M/TAMMY C GARCIA
MORENO
404 N EAGLE ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
DIANE MATHE
1530 RUSH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
BRIAN K/JULIEANN FOWLER
305 N WESTFIELD ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
RANKIN OSHKOSH HOLDING LLC
518 MAIN ST #346
WRIGHTSTOWN, WI 54180
BENJAMIN L BARFKNECHT/KAYLA
M FOX
335 N WESTFIELD ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
OSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
PO BOX 3048
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
Red Arrow Park
TAFT AVTAFT AV
N EAGLE STN EAGLE STN WESTFIELD STN WESTFIELD STSOUTHLAND AVSOUTHLAND AV
RUSH AVRUSH AV
PORTER AVPORTER AV
LLOOMMBBAARRDD AAVV
N EAGLE STN EAGLE STC:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 9/6/2022
1 in = 83,333 ft1 in = 15.78 mi¯OSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOLOSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOL
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
I
SR-5
SR-9
MR-20
SMU
I-PD
SR-5
SMU-PD
SMU
MR-12
UMU
SMU-PD
I-PD
I-PD
DR-6
MR-20
UMU
SMU-PD
UMU
SMU
DR-6
MR-12
UMU-PD
SR-5
Red Arrow Park
!"#$41
WITZEL AVWITZEL AVN KOELLER STN KOELLER STTAFT AVTAFT AV
DOVE STDOVE STHAWK STHAWK STN LARK STN LARK STN WESTFIELD STN WESTFIELD STSOUTHLAND AVSOUTHLAND AV
RUSH AVRUSH AV
SULLIVAN STSULLIVAN STROBIN AVROBIN AV
ADAMS AVADAMS AV
PIERCE AVPIERCE AV
N EAGLE STN EAGLE STN MEADOW STN MEADOW STLOMBARD AVLOMBARD AV
FAUST AVFAUST AV
COOLIDGE AVCOOLIDGE AV
SKYVIEW AVSKYVIEW AV
VAN BUREN AVVAN BUREN AV
NATIONAL AVNATIONAL AV
CLAYTON CTCLAYTON CT
N LARK STN LARK STN EAGLE STN EAGLE STWWEESSTTPPOOIINNTT EE DD RR
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 9/6/2022
1 in = 83,333 ft1 in = 15.78 mi¯OSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOLOSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOL
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 9/6/2022
1 in = 83,333 ft1 in = 15.78 mi¯OSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOLOSHKOSH WEST HIGH SCHOOL
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer