HomeMy WebLinkAbout27. 22-246JUNE 14, 2022 22-246 RESOLUTION
CARRIED___7-0____LOST_______LAID OVER_______WITHDRAWN_______)
PURPOSE: APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A TINY HOME DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST PACKER AVENUE
INITIATED BY: CHET WESENBERG ARCHITECT, LLC
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/ findings and conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan for a tiny home development on the south side of West
Packer Avenue, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-387 of the Oshkosh
Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for tiny
home development on the south side of West Packer Avenue, per the attached, is hereby
approved with the following findings:
1. The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall
purpose and intent of this Chapter.
2. The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land
use impacts in the environs of the subject site.
3. Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the
range of uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including
but not limited to public sewer and water and public roads.
4. The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned
Development project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
5. The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits
in terms of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to
addressing development performance that relate to and more than
JUNE 14, 2022 22-246 RESOLUTION
CONT’D
compensate for any requested exceptions/base standard modifications
variation of any standard or regulation of this Chapter.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following are conditions of approval for a
Specific Implementation Plan and General Development Plan for a tiny home
development on the south side of West Packer Avenue:
1. Base Standard Modification to allow a multi-family residential land use in the
Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU).
2. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced parking to 46 spaces, where
code requires a minimum of 72 parking spaces.
3. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced front yard setback to 9’
(pavement) and 17’ 5” (principal building), where code requires a 25’ front
yard setback.
4. Base Standard Modification to reduced rear yard setback 4’ 9” (sports field).
5. Base Standard Modification to allow increased number of residential
accessory structures to 33, where code allows a maximum of 3 residential
accessory structures.
6. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced front setback for signage to 10’,
where code requires a 25’ front yard setback.
7. Base Standard Modification to allow increased lighting level to 0.8 fc along
the north property line and 0.6 fc along the west property line, where code
allows a maximum lighting level of 0.5 fc at the property line.
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons, Planning Services Manager
DATE: June 9, 2022
RE: Approve General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for a Tiny
Home Development Located on the South Side of West Packer Avenue
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval for a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a tiny home development. The subject area consists of a 3.5 acre
vacant parcel located on the south side of West Packer Ave, west of North Main Street and east
of Jackson Street. The property is zoned Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) and the
surrounding area consists predominantly of commercial and vacant land uses. The 2040
Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends General Commercial use for the subject area.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing a “tiny home village”, which will consist of 31 individual dwelling
units, each 478 sq. ft. in size, as well as a 768 sq. ft. manager’s dwelling unit and community
center. The village is intended to offer independent housing to homeless families in the area.
Site amenities will include a garden, outdoor social gathering gazebos, an outdoor playground,
a sports field, access to storage, and a multi-purpose community center including a kitchen,
laundry room, and vocational-style classrooms.
A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on November 30, 2021. Neighboring property owners
voiced concerns primarily related to the proposed use and management of the site. A second in-
person neighborhood meeting was held on May 19, 2022. Attendees asked questions related to
operations, examples of similar projects, and types of residences who would live in the
development. A Plan Commission workshop was held on January 19, 2021. Plan Commission
voiced general support for the proposed use of the site during the workshop.
The applicant is requesting BSMs related to the land use, reduced parking, reduced setbacks,
number of accessory buildings, and increased lighting. To offset these BSMs, the applicant has
significantly exceeded the overall landscaping point requirement for the site and also provided
additional bicycle parking. The applicant has also provided safety/security features such as
enhanced lighting and an emergency vehicle path to alleviate safety concerns noted by City
Police and Fire Departments. Staff feel comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the
requested BSMs and the overall site will not have an adverse impact on the surrounding area.
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this project would likely not result in an increase in the assessed property value as
the property will likely be exempt but the applicant would need to apply for an exemption. The
applicant is anticipating spending approximately $4.5 million on the development.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan with findings and conditions on May 17, 2022. Please see the attached staff
report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved:
Mark Lyons John Fitzpatrick
Planning Services Manager Assistant City Manager / Director of
Administrative Services
ITEM II: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
APPROVAL FOR A TINY HOME DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON SOUTH
SIDE OF W PACKER AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of June 7, 2022.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Chet Wesenberg Architect, LLC
Owner: Oshkosh Kids Foundation
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests approval for a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a tiny home development.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Type:
The subject area consists of a 3.5 acre vacant parcel located on the south side of W. Packer Ave,
west of N. Main Street, east of Jackson Street. The property is zoned Suburban Mixed Use
District (SMU) and the surrounding area consists predominantly of commercial and vacant land
uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends General Commercial use for the
subject area.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use Zoning
Vacant SMU
Recognized Neighborhood Organizations
None
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing Uses Zoning
North Commercial UI
South Industrial HI
East Commercial SMU
West Commercial SMU
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
2040 Comprehensive Land Use Recommendation General Commercial
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 2
ANALYSIS
Use
The applicant is proposing a “tiny home village”, which will consist of 31 individual dwelling
units, each 478 sq. ft. in size, as well as a 768 sq. ft. manager’s dwelling unit and community
center. The village is intended to offer independent housing to homeless families in the area.
Site amenities will include a garden, outdoor social gathering gazebos, outdoor playground,
sports field, access to storage, and multi-purpose community center including a kitchen,
laundry room, and vocational-style classrooms.
The Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) does not permit residential uses. Therefore, a Base
Standard Modification (BSM) is being requested to allow the proposed multi-family residential
land use. The applicant states that the proposed location has been chosen based on its
proximity to supporting services. Staff recommends approval of the proposed BSM as this
particular multi-family residential use (tiny home village) is relatively compatible with
surrounding low-intensity commercial and open-space land uses.
A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on November 30, 2021. Neighboring property
owners voiced concerns primarily related to the proposed use and management of the site. A
second in-person neighborhood meeting was held on May 19th. Attendees ask questions related
to operations, examples of similar project and types of residences who would live in the
development. A Plan Commission workshop was held on January 19, 2021. Plan Commission
voiced general support for the proposed use of the site during the workshop.
Site Design/Access
The site will be accessed via a single entrance/exit from W. Packer Avenue. The total
impervious surface ratio for the site will be about 32.7%, which is well under the maximum of
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 3
70% for the SMU district. Parking for the site will consist of a 46-stall parking lot, which is
under the minimum of 2 spaces per dwelling unit containing 0-2 bedrooms, plus 0.5 space per
additional bedroom over 2 bedrooms per unit and 1 guest parking space for every 3 dwelling
units.
Staff is supportive of the proposed BSM for reduced number of parking spaces as most of the
occupants will likely not own vehicles. Also, the site is located in close proximity to the city bus
route system. To offset the parking stall reduction, the applicant has provided 18 bicycle
parking spaces, where code requires a minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces.
Required Provided
Parking Spaces Minimum: 72 46
Impervious Surface Maximum: 70% of lot 32.7% of lot
Minimum Provided
Front Setback (W Packer Ave.) 25 ft. 9 ft. (pavement)
17.41 (principle building)
Side Setback (east) 10 ft. 130 ft. +/- (principle building)
Side Setback (west) 10 ft. 24.83 ft. (principle building)
Rear Setback (south) 25 ft. 4.75 ft. (sports field)
26.58 ft. (principle building)
The applicant requested multiple BSMs for reduced front and rear yard setbacks. As proposed,
the parking lot will have a 9’ front setback and the northernmost homes and sheds will have a
17.41’ front setback, where 25’ front yard setback is required. The proposed sports field will
have a 4.75’ rear yard setback, where a 25’ rear yard setback is required.
Staff is supportive of the reduced front yard setback as site constraints limit the ability to move
the parking area and northernmost units further from the right-of-way and maintain the
necessary spacing of the buildings. Staff is also supportive of the reduced rear yard setback for
the sports field as this will be an open/rec area which should not negatively impact the
neighboring industrial property to the south as well as separated by a fence.
A 50’ X 64’ sports field, playground, patio area, (2) gazebos, and community garden areas are
being provided, meeting the minimum recreation area requirement of 200 sq. ft. plus 25 sq. ft.
per bedroom. The code-required pedestrian access is provided in the form of a 9’ wide
pedestrian path, with underground heating, that wraps around the site and connects to W.
Packer Ave. As requested by the Oshkosh Police and Fire Departments, the pedestrian path
will be wide enough to allow for emergency vehicle access to all of the homes via two gated
entrances from W. Packer Ave. The site will be surrounded by 6’ black chain link fencing, with
3’ tall decorative metal fencing within the front setback areas.
The site plan includes a small storage shed for each home and two larger storage sheds, for a
total of 33 accessory buildings on the site, where code allows a maximum of 3 residential
accessory structures. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the additional accessory structures as
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 4
they are needed to provide storage of personal items due to the small size of the dwelling units
and the larger accessory structures are needed for storage of maintenance equipment.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
The site plan includes a storm water pond on the eastern portion of the site. The applicant has
been in contact with the Department of Public Works regarding storm water management for
the area. The final storm water management plans will be approved during the Site Plan
Review process. The storm water management facility will be entirely enclosed by a fence.
Landscaping
Points Required Points Provided
Building Foundation 1,869 1,869
Paved Area 230 (69 tall trees, 92 shrubs) 661
(180 tall trees, 2 shrubs)
Street Frontage 430 (215 medium trees) 541 (105 medium trees)
Yards 439 1,271
Total 2,968 4,342
Building Foundation
The building foundation landscaping point requirement of 40 landscaping points per 100 linear
feet of building foundation is being met for the site. The Oshkosh Police Department has
recommended that lower profile shrub species be utilized to allow for visibility of front window
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 5
areas on the units. Staff is recommending that shrubs along the front of the units be limited to
4’ tall at maturity.
Paved Area
The paved area requirement of 50 landscaping points per 10 parking stalls or 10,000 sq. ft. of
paved area is being met. The code further specifies 30% of all points will be devoted to tall trees
and 40% will be devoted to shrubs. The plan is meeting the tall tree requirement, however
shrub points will need to be reallocated to meet this requirement. A tall deciduous/shade tree is
required at the ends of all parking rows, which has been provided on the plan.
Street Frontage
Code requires 100 points per 100 feet of street frontage. The landscaping ordinance also
specifies that 50% of the required points must be devoted to medium trees. The landscape plan
shows an insufficient number of medium trees along the street frontage. An additional 110 of
the street frontage points must be devoted to medium trees to meet this requirement. The total
point points provided along the street frontage exceeds the minimum requirement. This will
serve to offset the requested base standard modification for front yard setback reduction.
Yards
Code requires 20 landscaping points per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The provided yard
landscaping points greatly exceed this requirement.
Signage
Signage plans have not been included with this request, however the applicant has included a
proposed monument sign location on the site plan. The sign is shown along the entrance to the
site with an approximate 10’ setback. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the reduced sign
setback as it is necessary to allow for visibility of the sign due to the location of the parking lot.
Staff is recommending that sign be limited to multi-family district sign standards, which limits
ground signs to dual post or monument signs at a maximum height 5’ and maximum area of 25
sq. ft.
Site Lighting
The applicant submitted a photometric plan that meets the .4 foot-candle minimum requirement
for parking areas and has no more than .5 foot-candles of light trespass at the property line,
with the exception of relatively small areas along the front property line (public right-of-way)
and side (west) property line. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the increased lighting levels
as it will only minimally exceed the maximum at the property line and is needed to provide
additional lighting for the site as requested by the Oshkosh Police Department.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 6
Photometric Plan
The Oshkosh Police Department has recommended that lighting be provided near the front of
homes, near the sheds to the rear of the homes, trash enclosure area, picnic area, sports field,
community building, and internal walkway. This is intended to provide a safe environment for
the occupants. The applicant has provided lighting throughout the site, including motion
sensor fixtures on the homes for increased security.
As proposed, the tallest light poles on the site will be 20’ tall, which complies with the 20 foot
maximum fixture mounting height for the SMU zoning district.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 7
Building Facades
Community Building north and east elevations
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 8
Community building south and west elevations
Floor plan and elevations for dwelling units
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 9
Accessory building elevations
Building elevation renderings have been submitted for the project. As all units will be smaller
versions of single family residential style structures, staff reviewed the plans in comparison to
single family residential design standards for new homes. The provided elevations are
consistent with the exterior material requirements for single family homes as well as the 25%
door window requirement for front facades. The front dwelling unit elevations include
illuminated address numbers to provide identification of the units.
Staff is also supportive of the proposed exterior appearance of the community building as it is
consistent with exterior building standards for commercial uses.
Refuse Enclosure
The site plan includes a refuse enclosure at both ends of the parking lot, which will be 6’ tall
with a brick veneer exterior. A BSM is required for the proposed locations of the dumpster
enclosures as they are located between a building and a public street. Staff is supportive of this
BSM as it is the most functional area for refuse enclosure placement based on the site design,
with the parking area fronting the street.
Overall Site
The applicant is requesting BSMs related to the land use, reduced parking, reduced setbacks,
number of accessory buildings, and increased lighting. To offset these BSMs, the applicant has
significantly exceeded the overall landscaping point requirement for the site and also provided
additional bicycle parking. The applicant has also provided safety/security features such as
enhanced lighting and emergency vehicle path to alleviate safety concerns noted by City Police
and Fire Departments. Staff is comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the
requested BSMs and the overall site will not have an adverse impact on the surrounding area.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 10
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Specific
Implementation Plan, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings
based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of this Chapter.
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts
in the environs of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and
adequate buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
Staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan
with the findings listed above and the proposed following conditions:
1. Base Standard Modification to allow a multi-family residential land use in the Suburban
Mixed Use District (SMU).
2. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced parking to 46 spaces, where code requires
a minimum of 72 parking spaces.
3. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced front yard setback to 9’ (pavement) and 17’
5” (principal building), where code requires a 25’ front yard setback.
4. Base Standard Modification to reduced rear yard setback 4’ 9” (sports field).
5. Base Standard Modification to allow increased number of residential accessory
structures to 33, where code allows a maximum of 3 residential accessory structures.
6. Base Standard Modification to allow reduced front setback for signage to 10’, where
code requires a 25’ front yard setback.
7. Base Standard Modification to allow increased lighting level to 0.8 fc along the north
property line and 0.6 fc along the west property line, where code allows a maximum
lighting level of 0.5 fc at the property line.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 11
8. Base Standard Modification to allow refuse enclosures between a building and a public
street.
9. Building foundation shrub plantings on the front side of dwelling units shall be limited
to a maximum height of 4’ at maturity.
10. Final landscaping and storm water management plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Department of Community Development.
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan on June 7, 2022. The following is their discussion on the item.
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Mitchell, Ms. Davey, Mr. Bowen, Ms. Propp, and Ms. Scheuermann
all reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The applicant requests approval for a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a tiny home development.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is proposing a “tiny home village”,
which will consist of 31 individual dwelling units, each 478 sq. ft. in size, as well as a 768 sq. ft.
manager’s dwelling unit and community center. The village is intended to offer independent
housing to homeless families in the area. Site amenities will include a garden, outdoor social
gathering gazebos, outdoor playground, sports field, access to storage, and multi-purpose
community center including a kitchen, laundry room, and vocational style classrooms.
The Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) does not permit residential uses. Therefore, a Base
Standard Modification (BSM) is being requested to allow the proposed multi-family residential
land use. The applicant states that the proposed location has been chosen based on its
proximity to supporting services. Staff recommends approval of the proposed BSM as this
particular multi-family residential use (tiny home village) is relatively compatible with
surrounding low-intensity commercial and open-space land uses.
A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on November 30, 2021. Neighboring property
owners voiced concerns primarily related to the proposed use and management of the site. A
Plan Commission workshop was held on January 19, 2021. A second in person neighborhood
meeting was held on May 19th. Plan Commission voiced general support for the proposed use
of the site. Staff recommends approval with the findings and conditions as listed in the staff
report.
Mr. Perry opened up technical questions to staff.
Mr. Bowen asked what type of materials are being used for the buildings.
Mr. Lyons said the community center building meets the required material which is vinyl and
the tiny homes themselves meet the residential standards.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 12
Mr. Bowen asked if there has been discussion reducing the number of the units by two to
remove the need for the base standard modification for a 17 ½ foot setback.
Mr. Lyons said the goal was to get this overall number of units. There are other zoning districts
like SR-9 with a 15 foot setback. Trying to have a minimum quality of life for these individuals,
going to a 17 ½ setback wasn’t an issue with staff and made sense to give them more space.
Mr. Bowen asked if we have precedence within other zoning classifications for a principal
residential structure within that type of setback and it sounds like SR-9 is comparable.
Mr. Lyons said yes and SR-9 is even smaller.
Ms. Scheuermann asked if there are sidewalks.
Mr. Lyons said there are sidewalks on Packer Ave.
Mr. Perry asked for any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any
statements.
Corey Wallace, Wesenberg Architects, 240 Algoma Blvd. They worked on the community center
design and could answer any questions.
Mr. Lyons asked if he could talk about the exterior finishes.
Mr. Wallace said they are using LP composite smart siding with asphalt shingles and quarter
trim boards.
Mr. Perry closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
Mr. Lyons asked if they are similar designs to other larger multi-family residential clubhouses.
Mr. Wallace said they recently did a project in the last few years that was similar.
There were no closing statements from the applicant.
Motion by Mitchell to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Seconded by Davey.
Mr. Perry asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Ms. Propp said she was hoping the applicant would talk about management of the site and
management of kids in regards to the kennel club. She asked if there was going to be someone
on site at all times.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 13
Mr. Lyons said there is a motion on the floor so they couldn’t have the applicant come back
unless the commission would allow them.
Mr. Bowen said he would like to hear what the applicant would like to say.
Mr. Perry said to continue the questions on the motion first then we will call the applicant up
afterwards.
Ms. Propp asked how much space is between each unit.
Mr. Lyons said its 17 feet 4 inches.
Mr. Mitchell asked if Mr. Slusarek helped on this project.
Mr. Slusarek said yes.
Mr. Mitchell explained that when a nonstandard request comes to city hall, and he appreciates
the creativeness and willingness to approach this with an open mind. The support that is
provided to find solutions is helpful especially when it comes to low income populations such
as this. The concerns that Ms. Pischke and Ms. Bohnert have are appropriate. Ms. Pischke is well
aware of the challenges certain populations may pose, but is aware of the impact a positive
environment would have on these families. He is excited to support this project.
Mr. Deppiesse said that Todd Mandel, Wisconsin Partnership for Housing Development, 821 E
Washington Ave, Madison, WI; will be answering questions with him as they will also be a co-
owner with the Oshkosh Kids Foundation. Advocap is a partner agency that will have a full-
time case worker on site to work with the families and what needs they have. There will be an
on-site full-time live-in manager to oversee the families. The property management is
contracted out to another firm for buildings and grounds and leasing activities. There will be
multiple people there full-time.
Ms. Propp asked if that means there will be someone there to assist neighbors with concerns.
Mr. Mandel said that the person that is employed for the full-time live in position will be there
to help with community development and community relations. He doesn’t think there will be
an issue with kids from the tiny homes village crossing the street and bothering the dogs from
the kennel club. If it does happen, there is someone there to help. Also, the traffic count on
Packer Ave is 2200 cars per day which is one of the lowest traffic counts of major arteries in the
city. Highway 76 has 16,000 cars a day.
Mr. Perry asked if the project has program participant requirements and can’t hang around all
day.
Mr. Mandel said that is correct and that Advocap will help to manage that but they will be
actively seeking employment, education or other needs. The goal is to get them stabilized and
moved on.
ITEM II B: GDP SIP Packer Ave. 14
Ms. Davey asked for clarification on why the OPD has been involved in the discussion and the
point of having someone on site doing paperwork and if it’s protection from the inhabitants or
for the inhabitants.
Chief Smith said it was important for them to be involved in the project because there is a
density associated with the project. The clientele that will be living there are going to have
programs in place to help them transition from where they currently are at to make them
productive community members. The design of the building itself from the point of view from
law enforcement is not only for patrolling purposes but also to maintain the safety of the
community. The applicant has been receptive to every request law enforcement and the fire
department has made and they were willing to make significant changes to their original plan.
They are developing patrol plans to go through the neighborhood, but not as a protection from
the residents or for the residents, but they become a part of the community and we have to
patrol that just as we would any other part of the community. There will be programming
within the facility to develop relationships and to help alleviate mistrust with law enforcement.
Motion carried 9-0.
SUBMIT TO:
C'f
(./ C y' City of Oshkosh Dept. of Comrnunify Development
215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1 130
Ooshkofsh Planned Development Application PPHONE: (920) 236-5059
For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan
**PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK""
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: Chet Wesenberg Architect, LLC Date: 4/4/22
Petitioner's Address: 240 Algoma Boulevard- suite A City: Oshkosh State: WI Zip: 54901
Telephone #: (920) 230 - 4900 Email: corey@wesenberg.co Contact preference: O Phone f Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): _- Owjier X Representative [Tenant :] Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required): Date: 4/1/2.Z 22
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): Oshkosh Kid Foundation Date:
Owner(s) Address: po box 1433 City: Oshkosh State: Wi Zip: 54903
Telephone #: (920) 376-5882 Email: info@oshkoshkids.org Contact preference: O Phone fffi Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): -Individual q Trust C Partnership q Corporation X 501 C non-profit
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter
upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all
meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other
administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: Y Date:
TYPE OF REQUEST:
N General Development Plan (GDP) q General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment
i Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) q Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment
SITE INFORMATION
Address/Location of Proposed Project: West Packer Avenue
Proposed Project Type: Housing Development
Current Use of Property: vacant Zoning: SMU-PD
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: U)
South: HI
East: HI
West: SMU
It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal.
Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
> Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.ashkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm
Sign Staff Date Rec'd
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - Must accompany the application to be complete.
(Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy)
The following information must be provided in order for the application to be considered complete and able to
be scheduled for Plan Commission Review. Please use the checklist below to determine the required information
to be submitted at the time of application. If all information below cannot be provided at the time of application,
please request a waiver in writing to the Division's Director or designee.
q A General Development Plan (GDP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(4), shall include the following items
(Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy):
q General location map of the subject site depicting:
•All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the
boundaries of the subject property.
•Current zoning of the subject site and abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that
control.
•A graphic scale and north arrow.
q Generalized site plan showing the pattern or proposed land uses, including:
•General size, shape, and arrangement of lots and specific use areas.
•Basic street pattern and pattern of internal drives.
•General site grading plan showing preliminary road grades.
•Basic storm drainage pattern, including proposed on-site stormwater detention.
•General location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of any such areas to
be classified as common open space.
q Statistical data, including:
•Minimum lot sizes in the development.
•Approximate areas of all lots.
•Density/intensity of various parts of the development.
•Building coverage.
•Landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses.
•Expected staging.
q Conceptual landscaping plan.
q General signage plan.
q General outline of property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions.
q A written description of the proposed Planned Development, including:
•General project themes and images.
•The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses.
•Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities.
•General treatment of natural features.
•General relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
•General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other area plans.
•Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
•Estimated project cost
q Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee.
q A Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(5), shall include the following items.
Note that the area included in an SIP may be only a portion of the area included in a previously approved GDP
(Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy):
q An existing conditions map of the subject site depicting the following:
•All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the
boundaries of the subject site.
•Current zoning of the subject property and all abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that
maintains that control.
•Existing utilities and recorded easements.
•All lot dimensions of the subject site.
•A graphic scale and a north arrow.
q An SIP map of the proposed site showing at least the following:
•Lot layout and the arrangements of buildings.
•Public and private roads, driveways, walkways, and parking facilities.
. Specific treatment and location of recreational and open space areas, including designation of
any such areas to be classified as common open space.
q Proposed grading plan.
o Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location, species, and installation size of
plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species.
q Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi-family structures, or building clusters, other than
conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor
area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings.
o Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems, stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and
walkways,
q Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs,
and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common
practices.
o Specific written description of the proposed SIP including:
•Specific project themes and images.
•Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses.
® Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre,
and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity,
•Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland.
•Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
•Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots
and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and
landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by
Plan Commission.
A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shall list the standard
zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion, would inhibit the development project and the
opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project.
•A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s)
in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur.
Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended.
•Estimated project cost
o Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the
development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common
open areas and amenities.
q A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all
differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP.
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are included with this
application. I am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result in denial or
delay of the application request.
Applicant's Signature (required): Date: 4/t/2
Project Name: Continuum- Tiny Home Village April 20, 2022
GDP / SIP application Revised 4-21-22
GDP:
Statistical Data, including:
Minimum lot sized in the Development: NA, parcel not sub-divided
Approximate areas of all lots: 155,330 sf; = 3.57 acres
Density / Intensity of various parts of the development: 32 dwelling units / 3.57 acres
Building coverage: 24,144 sf
Landscaping surface area ration of all land uses: Green Space + sports field = 86,147 sf
General Outlining of the property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions: No covenants. There is an AT&T easement
running north/south in the east portion of the parcel.
A written description of the proposed Planned Development, including:
• General project themes and images: Generally, the project is designed to have the appearance of a small village with small homes and
community areas centered around a central Community Center.
• The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses: the proposed development is anticipated to consist of (31) small independent
single-family dwelling units, (1) manager’s dwelling unit, a storage shed to accompany each dwelling unit, two general accessory storage
buildings, a Community Center structure, two outdoor community gazebos, and various community orientated site amenities.
• Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities:
o (31) Dwelling Units. 478 sf each = 14,818 sf total
o (1) Manager’s Dwelling Unit: 768 sf
o (31) Dwelling Unit storage sheds. 82 sf each = 2542 sf total
o (2) general use storage buildings- 352 sf each = 704 sf total
o (2) Gazebos- 780 sf each = 1560 sf total
o (1) Community Center- 3725 sf
• General treatment of natural features:
o The site currently consists of relatively level unmaintained grass and is otherwise not developed. The development proposes
landscaping as indicated on the submitted Site Landscape Plan along with a “Wet Pond” on the recently acquired east portion of
the property to contribute to Storm Water Management Best Practices.
• General relationship to nearby properties and public streets:
o The property has 535 lineal feet of coverage along West Packer Avenue. The adjacent property to the east supports a building
that was formerly a bank and is now used for bank office administration. The parcel to the west has a large one-story metal
sided building. The south of the parcel is mostly undeveloped except, adjacent to the southeast corner, the adjacent property
has a one-story metal part fabrication facility.
• General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other plans.
o The entire comprehensive plan is submitted herein, indicating all primary and secondary buildings, sidewalks, parking lot, et c.
2 / 4
• Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance:
The development:
o proposes a multi-family residential use in a SMU-PD district.
o proposes parking, two houses, two refuse enclosures, and a future monument sign within the otherwise required 25 foot front
yard setback.
o the proposed sports field is within the required 25 foot rear yard setback.
o proposes more than three accessory structures.
o proposes 46 parking stalls as opposed to the 74 otherwise required by the zoning ordinance.
o Site photometrics indicate two areas along the north property line with more than .5 fc over the property line.
• Estimated project cost:
o $4.5 million
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee.
A traffic Impact study has not been conducted.
SIP:
Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs, and group d evelopment signage
themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common practices:
• Individual structures are intended to have address numbers per City guidelines. The houses are proposed to have their respective address
numbers on a post on the front porch. They will be highlighted at night with a light source.
• The submittal indicates a location for a future monument sign near the drive approach along West Packer Avenue. Other than the
proposed location, city sign standards are anticipated to be met. When a design is determined, the City submittal process shall be
followed for permits as needed for the sign.
Specific written description of the proposed SIP including:
• Specific project themes and images:
o the project is designed to have the appearance of a small village with small homes and community areas centered around a
central Community Center.
• Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses:
o (31) Dwelling Units. 478 sf each = 14,818 sf total
o (1) Manager’s Office / Running Unit = 768 sf
o (31) Dwelling Unit storage sheds. 82 sf each = 2542 sf total
o (2) general use storage buildings- 352 sf each = 704 sf total
o (2) Gazebos- 780 sf each = 1560 sf total
o (1) Community Center- 3725 sf
• Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre, and landscaping surface area ratio
and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity.
o 32 dwelling units / 3.57 acres= 9.0 Dwelling Units / Acre
o 86,147 sf green space (pervious area) + 17,250 sf pond / 155,330 sf total property area = 66.5% pervious
3 / 4
• Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland.
o The site currently consists of relatively level unmaintained grass and is otherwise not developed. The development proposes
landscaping as indicated on the submitted Site Landscape Plan along with a “Wet Pond” on the recently acquired east portion of
the property to contribute to Storm Water Management Best Practices.
• Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
o The property has 535 lineal feet of coverage along West Packer Avenue. The adjacent property to the east supports a building
that was formerly a bank and is now used for bank office administration. The parcel to the west has a large one-story metal
sided building. The south of the parcel is mostly undeveloped except, adjacent to the south east corner, the adjacent property
has a one-story metal part fabrication facility.
• Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots and pads; density/intensity of various
parts of the development; building coverage, and landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans
required by Plan Commission.
o Minimum lot sizes: Not Applicable
o Total building coverage: 24,117 sf
o 86,147 sf green space (pervious area) + 17,250 sf pond / 155,330 sf total property area = 66.5% pervious
• A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shall list the standard zoning requirements that, in the
applicant’s opinion, would inhibit the development project and the opportunities for community betterment that are available through the
proposed PD project.
o The intention of the proposed Development is to create a village to act in the continuum of homeless citizens. The Planned
Development is proposed because typical zoning ordinances are not specifically applicable to a development on one parcel that
includes several buildings of more than one use.
Regarding Community betterment- individuals, families and single parents with children whom have suffered setbacks will have
an opportunity to better their lives through the availability of what the village offers. The village offers independent housing to
those in need along with amenities to provide a sense of community, social interaction, and self-sustenance. In addition to the
individual Dwelling Units, features to serve the village residents include a garden, outdoor social gathering gazebos, outdoor
playground, access to storage, a recreational sports field and a Community Center. The Community Center is proposed to serve
as a multi-purpose gathering space with a kitchen and vocational style classrooms, and is intended to be utilized to teach life,
financial, and home management skills. In addition to background screening that will be conducted as one of the means to
determine accepted housing applicants, the Community Center will have an office designated for the City of Oshkosh Police
Department to promote safety.
To further convenience and aid those seeking to improve on their lives and their impact within the community, this site for the
village was selected and is proposed due to its proximity to off-site amenities that can further help the village occupants. The
site is located in the vicinity of life supporting organizations and businesses such as the NOVA Counseling Services, Cabulance
Inc, ADVOCAP, Saint Vincent De Paul, and Coin Laundry; and also for its proximity to the city bus route, Oaklawn Elementary
School, and Oshkosh North High School. Please refer to the attached exhibit A for reference.
• A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s) in which such exceptions/base
standard modifications, would occur.
o Multi-family family residential use is not typically allowed in a SMU zoning district.
▪ This BSM is proposed to allow the development to this site due to the sites proximity to supporting services.
o the proposed parking lot, two refuse enclosures, and two houses are within the otherwise minimum 25 foot front yard setback.
4 / 4
▪ to reduce the visual impact of the aforementioned features within the 25’ front yard setback, the development
proposes additional landscaping in excess of zoning requirements between the street and the features.
o the proposed sports field is within the required 25’ rear yard setback.
▪ to reduce the impact on the adjacent property to the south, a 6 foot high fence is proposed along the south property
line. Additionally, generally the development proposes landscape plantings in excess of zoning ordinance
requirements.
o the development proposes more than the maximum allowable number of accessory structures.
▪ to counter the impact of additional accessory structures, generally the development proposes landscape plantings in
excess of zoning ordinance requirements. The Oshkosh Police Department was consulted regarding safety concerns
that can be associated with additional accessory structures. Per Oshkosh Police Department recommendations,
motion activated lighting will be placed so as to provide more visibility adjacent to the accessory buildings. There will
also be a video surveillance system installed to monitor the site.
o the development proposes 46 parking stalls whereas the zoning ordinance requires 74 stalls.
▪ the facility occupants are not expected to have the same vehicle ownership rate as that of the general population for
which the zoning ordinance was intended. Given the nature of the proposed tenants, the site was selected in part due
to its proximity to the city bus route system. Additonal bike rack storage is also proposed in that the zoning ordinance
requires 4 spaces and a minimum of 18 are proposed.
o the development indicates a future monument sign within the otherwise required 25’ front yard setback.
▪ to counter the impact of the proximity of the proposed sign to the north property line, generally the development
proposes landscape plantings in excess of zoning ordinance requirements. The City submittal process is anticipated
to be followed for permits as needed for future signage.
o the Site Photometrics Plan indicates two areas along the north property line where light fixtures cast more than .5 fc over the
property line.
• Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended.
o The entire village is proposed to be constructed during one continuous construction sequence. The anticipated construction
sequence includes construction of the Community Center, followed by the individual dwelling units and then the accessory
storage structures and gathering gazebos.
• Estimated project cost.
o $4.5 million
Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the development and particularl y providing for the
permanent preservation and maintenance of common open areas and amenities
• There will be an on-site manager that will watch over the property and attend to maintenance projects. Maintenance will be subcontracted as
needed, plumbing, mechanical, etc.
A lawn service will be hired to maintain lawn and landscaping.
Heating will be installed under the sidewalks, so snow removal services will be reduced. Residents will be required to shovel their porches. If a
house is vacant, the on-site manager will shovel any unoccupied porch. Snow removal from the parking lot will be stock-piled at the sports field.
A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all differences between the requirements
of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP. Not applicable. No previous GDP submittal
IP
IP
IP
WMWV
SAN
WV
GUY
WV
SAN
C
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
COMMVAULT
TELPED
TELPED
TELPED
SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
AT&TREMOTETERMINAL
CP 1
WEST PACKER AVENUE
CP 2
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
W
IP
E
E
E
E
E
G G G G G G G G
W
VERVECREDITUNION
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SIGNPLANTER ASPHALTPARKING
LOT
ASPHALTPARKINGLOT
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
WV
6"
P
V
C
6"
P
V
C
8"
D
I
8"
D
I
TT
T T T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
FO
F
O
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO FOFOFO
HYD
BM A
BM B
PP
PP PP
PP
ELECPED
48" RCCP
8"
C
M
C
P
8"
C
M
C
P
10"ABS 10"ABS
SAN SAN
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SANSANSANSAN
SANSAN
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
SAN
SAN
AT&T REMOTE TERMINAL
DRAINAGE SWALE, TYP
DRAINAGE SWALE, TYP
3' DECORATIVE BLACK
ALUMINUM FENCE
6' BLACK
CHAINLINK
FENCE
10' GATE, TYP
PEDESTRIAN EMERGENCY ACCESS
SA
N
SA
N
SA
N
W
W
W
W W
SA
N
STORMWATER
POND
W
6'-0"
AT&T
EASEMENT
535'-2"
MANAGER'S UNIT
(768 SF)
LARGE STORAGE
UNIT, TYP (16'X22')SMALL STORAGE
UNIT, TYP (10'X8'2")
29
0
'
-
3
"
535'-0"
29
0
'
-
4
"
SETBACK
10'-0"
SETBACK
10'-0"
SE
T
B
A
C
K
10
'
-
0
"
SE
T
B
A
C
K
10
'
-
0
"
SETBACK
10'-0"
SETBACK
10'-0"
SE
T
B
A
C
K
25
'
-
0
"
SE
T
B
A
C
K
25
'
-
0
"
SA
N
LANDSCAPED BED LANDSCAPED BED
SPORTS FIELD
COMMUNITY CENTER
(3,752 SF)
GAZEBO
GAZEBOPLAYGROUND
CONCRETE PATIO
COMMUNITYGARDEN
COMMUNITYGARDEN
CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK
CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
RESIDENTIAL UNIT,
TYP (14'x33')
MOUNTABLE CURB
& GUTTER, TYP
1 (A)
3 (A)
5 (A)
7 (A)
31 (A)
2 (B)
4 (B)
6 (B)
30 (B)
29 (A)28 (B)
9 (A)8 (B)10 (B)11 (A)
27 (C)26 (D)
13 (C)12 (B)14 (D)15 (C)
23 (C)
25 (C)
24 (D)
22 (D)
21 (C)
20 (D)
19 (C)
18 (D)
17 (C)
16 (D)
63
'
-
8
"
50'-0"
TYP
33'-0"
TY
P
14
'
-
0
"
48'-0"
16
'
-
0
"
27
4
'
-
4
"
64'-0"
32'-0"
32
'
-
0
"
24'-0"
TYP
9'-0"
99'-0"
TY
P
18
'
-
0
"
276'-9"
99'-0"17'-412"
61
'
-
0
"
17'-412"
ASPHALT PARKING LOT15,347 SF
17
'
-
4
"
TY
P
SS
S
S
6' BLACK CHAINLINK
FENCE
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X XXX
X
X
XXX
X
X
XXX
X
S S
SS
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X
XXX
X
X
XXX
X
X X
CAUTION
CAUTION
UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES LOCATE &
POT HOLE PRIOR TO
EXCAVATION.
APPROX MAX CUT
DEPTH OF 1.5'.
6' BLACK
CHAINLINK
FENCE
25
'
-
0
"
3' DECORATIVE BLACK
ALUMINUM FENCE
10'10'
3' DECORATIVE BLACK
ALUMINUM FENCE
(WITHIN 25' OF NORTH
PROPERTY LINE)
8' GATE, AT&T EASEMENT ACCESS
6"
P
V
C
6"
W
M
4"
W
M
4"
W
M
6"
W
M
6" WM
6"
W
M
6" PVC
6"
P
V
C
6" PVC 6" PVC
6" PVC
6"
P
V
C
9'
9'
FUTURE
MONUMENT SIGN
9'
9'
9'
25
'
-
0
"
ADD CONDUIT FOR FUTURE
LIGHTS TO SIGN
W
W
W
W
W W W W W
W
W
W
X
X XX
EXISTING TELEPHONE
LINE TO BE RELOCATED
AROUND POND
13'-0"
19
'
-
1
"
9'
-
0
"
17
'
-
5
"
13'-2"
CLOSE CURB CUT PER CITY OF
OSHKOSH STANDARDS
14'-4"
27'-5"
26'-3"
25'-11"
24'-10"
11'-11"
11
'
-
1
0
"
24
'
-
1
1
"
26
'
-
7
"
13
'
-
8
"
4'
-
9
"
24" SS @ 0.4%
24" SS @ 0.4%24" SS @ 0.4%
6" WM
N89°10'47"E 535.00'
N0
1
°
0
8
'
4
7
"
W
2
9
0
.
2
4
'
S0
1
D
1
0
'
3
9
"
E
2
9
0
.
3
5
'
S89D11'29"W 535.16'
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
SHEET
Drawn:Designed:Checked:
Date:
Job No:
S:
\
C
U
R
R
P
R
O
J
\
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
\
C
H
E
T
\
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
U
M
\
C
I
V
I
L
3
D
\
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
U
M
\
S
H
E
E
T
S
P
L
A
N
\
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
U
M
-
1
0
2
-
S
I
T
E
.
D
W
G
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
4/
2
5
/
2
0
2
2
2
:
4
0
P
M
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
PL
O
T
B
Y
:
AA
R
O
N
S
A
R
A
U
E
R
LA
Y
O
U
T
N
A
M
E
-
01
-
S
i
t
e
Da
t
e
:
No
:
NORTH
Feet
0 25 50
Co
n
t
i
n
u
u
m
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
Os
h
k
o
s
h
,
W
I
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
XX-XX
04/20/22
DWD AJS ALK
BENCH MARKS
NO.DESCRIPTION ELEVATION
A TAG BOLT ON FLANGE OF HYDRANT, SOUTH SIDE OF WEST PACKER AVENUE, 500' EAST OF
JACKSON STREET 761.00
B TAG BOLT ON FLANGE OF HYDRANT, SOUTH SIDE OF WEST PACKER AVENUE, 400' WEST OF
NORTH MAIN STREET 762.21
**VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCED TO NAVD88 (PER THE CITY OF OSHKOSH).
EXISTING WATER VALVE
EXISTING PEDESTAL
EXISTING HYDRANT
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
SURVEY CONTROL POINT
APRON ENDWALLAEW
INV INVERT
TOC TOP OF CURB
PROPOSED CONTOUR
CLEAN OUT
G
IRON PIPEIP
GAS MAIN
CMP
FO
E
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
ELECTRIC CABLE
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
OVERHEAD LINE
SS
TV
T
OHE
R
OHT
TELEPHONE POLE
TV CABLE
RECORDED AS
STORM SEWER
OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE CABLE
OH
950
WOODED
EXISTING CONTOUR
DECIDUOUS TREE
EVERGREEN TREE
REMOVE TREE
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFFE
EXIST. CULVERT PIPE
950 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE EDGING
PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE
PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURE
EXISTING MANHOLE
PROPOSED APRON ENDWALL
EXISTING SIGN
EXISTING INLET
PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW
TRACKING PAD
ROCK FILTER BAG DITCH CHECK / SILT FENCE RELIEF
PERIMETER DIVERSION/FITLER BERM
BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION63.56
PROPOSED SHRUB
LEGEND - FEATURES
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS
(TOP OF CURB / FLOW LINE)
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
(ADD X00' FOR TRUE ELEV)
MASONRY SPLASH BLOCK PAD
MH
WV
SB
99.99
99.99
99.49
INLET PROTECTION (TYPE)B
1
SILT FENCE
S
CONTROL POINTS
NO.DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION
1 3/4" X 24" REBAR SET 485086.242 792318.153 759.92
2 3/4" X 24" REBAR SET 485092.782 792728.572 759.96
HORIZONTAL DATUM REFERENCED TO THE WISCONSIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM (WCCS), WINNEBAGO COUNTY, NAD83(1991).
VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCED TO NAVD88 (PER THE CITY OF OSHKOSH).
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING
ARE A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE EXISTING
CONDITIONS AS OBTAINED BY FIELD SURVEY ON 05/26/2021.
JAY PANETTI, S-2747
NAME, REGISTRATION NO.
LANDSCAPING NOTES
SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR TREATMENT OF ALL SURFACES.
ZONING & DIMENSIONSSITE NOTES
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR CONTINUUM TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
LOCATED IN SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC 12, T18N, R16E, CITY OF OSHKOSH,
WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN. FIELD SURVEYED ON 05/26/2021.
ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO NAVD88.
MORE THAN 1 ACRE OF LAND IS PROPOSED FOR DISTURBANCE. A
WDNR NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND MUST REMAIN ON THE PREMISES
AT ALL TIMES. LAND DISTURBANCE TO BE LIMITED TO AREAS
REQUIRED FOR GRADING AND PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AS SHOWN
ON THE PLANS.
WETLANDS EXIST ON THE SITE. A WDNR WATERWAY GENERAL
PERMIT IS PENDING APPROVAL TO ALLOW DISTURBANCE/FILLING OF
THE WETLANDS.
UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THERE MAY BE
OTHER UTILITIES PRESENT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. CONTACT
APPROPRIATE UTILITIES AND DIGGERS HOTLINE BEFORE DIGGING.
DIGGERS HOTLINE: DIAL 811 OR (800) 242-8511.
REMOVALS: REMOVE ALL PAVEMENTS, SIDEWALKS, AND CURB AS
SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL REMOVALS REQUIRED FOR
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT.
SAWCUTTING IS REQUIRED WHERE EXISTING ASPHALT OR CONCRETE
IS TO REMAIN.
TREE REMOVALS ARE INDICATED ON LANDSCAPING PLAN. REMOVE
ONLY TREES CONFLICTING WITH IMPROVEMENTS AND
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. TREE AND PLANT REMOVALS MUST BE
MARKED AND VERIFIED WITH OWNER OR SITE MANAGER PRIOR TO
CLEARING. CONSULT LANDSCAPING PLAN.
ANY NEW, DAMAGED, OR REPLACED CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE
4" MINIMUM THICKNESS WITH MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE.
CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE UNDER SIDEWALKS MUST BE 6"
MINIMUM THICKNESS.
CONCRETE PADS BY PEDESTRIAN DOORWAYS SHALL REFERENCE
STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR STOOP CONSTRUCTION.
VERIFY BUILDING DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
SNOW STORAGE: UTILIZE THE SPORTS FIELD WHEN EXPANDED SNOW
STORAGE IS REQUIRED ON THE SITE. ONLY SMALL TRUCKS ALLOWED
ACCESS TO AVOID EXCESSIVE WALKWAY LOADINGS.
NO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE STORED ON SITE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY OF OSHKOSH WATER
DISTRIBUTION UTILITY AT 232-5330 AT LEAST 7 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY
WORK INVOLVING THE PUBLIC WATER MAIN INCLUDING LATERAL
CONNECTIONS.
ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS
SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF OSHKOSH SPECIFICATIONS..
ALL TRUCKS SHALL TAKE THE SHORTEST ROUTE TO THE NEAREST
TRUCK ROUTE. THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MAY APPROVE
AN ALTERNATE ROUTE UPON REQUEST.
OWNER REPRESENTATIVE: CHET WESENBERG ARCHITECT LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 240 ALGOMA BLVD SUITE A, OSHKOSH WI 54901
PHONE NUMBER: (920) 230-4900
ZONING DISTRICT:SMU (SUBURBAN MIXED USE)
ACTUAL SITE AND IMPROVEMENT DIMENSIONS
EXIST LOT AREA:3.57 ACRES
PROP BLDG SETBACK:10 FT
PROP BLDG FOOTPRINT:22,585 SQ-FT
TOTAL PROP IMPERVIOUS ADDED: 1.17 ACRES
PROP AREA OF DISTURBANCE:3.57 ACRES
PAVEMENT STRUCTURE
PARKING LOT & PATCH AREAS
3" ASPHALTIC SURFACE (MIN)*
-1" UPPER LAYER,
-2" LOWER LAYER
8" CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (MIN)*
*PAVEMENT STRUCTURE TYPE/THICKNESS TO BE
CONFIRMED AND AUTHORIZED BY ARCHITECT
SIDEWALK
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
6" CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
INTERIOR WALKWAYS
HEATED WALKWAYS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY
OWNER. MIN THICKNESS SAME AS SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY APRONS
SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL.
SLABS
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR SLAB INFORMATION.
LIVING UNIT INFORMATION
UNIT #
(CONSTRUCTION PHASE)
RESIDENT UNIT
SIZE
STORAGE UNIT
SIZE
1 (A)
2 (B)
3 (A)
4 (B)
5 (A)
6 (B)
7 (A)
8 (B)
9 (A)
10 (B)
11 (A)
12 (B)
13 (C)
14 (D)
15 (C)
16 (D)
17 (C)
18 (D)
19 (C)
20 (D)
21 (C)
22 (D)
23 (C)
24 (D)
25 (C)
26 (D)
27 (C)
28 (B)
29 (A)
30 (B)
31 (A)
MANAGER'S UNIT
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1)IDENTIFY AND MARK PROPERTY LINES TO AVOID EXCESSIVE
CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE.
2)INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AND TRACKING PAD(S).
ADD SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS GRADING WORK
PROGRESSES.
3)DETERMINE PUBLIC (SEWER/WATER LATERAL) AND PRIVATE
BURIED UTILITY DEPTHS/ELEVATIONS. COORDINATE WITH
ENGINEER REGARDING ANY CHANGES THAT REQUIRE PLAN
UPDATES. COORDINATE WITH PRIVATE UTILITIES (AT&T)
REGARDING GRADING AND UNDERGROUND PIPE WORK NEAR
OR OVER THEIR PRIVATE UTILITIES FOR MONITORING AND
ADJUSTMENT PURPOSES.
4)INSTALL NEW LATERALS WITHIN STREET FOR POND OUTLET PIPE
AND NEW VERVE SEWER/WATER SERVICES. CONNECT VERVE
BUILDING TO NEW SEWER/WATER SERVICES PRIOR TO CLOSING
EXISTING SEWER/WATER SERVICES THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH
POND EXCAVATION. REALIGN PRIVATE UTILITIES SERVING
VERVE AROUND POND FOOTPRINT THAT ARE IN CONFLICT
5)STRIP TOPSOIL IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
a.WET DETENTION POND.
b.SWALES THAT DRAIN TO STORMWATER POND.
6)CONSTRUCT WET DETENTION POND AND SWALES.
a.EXCAVATE POND AND SWALE AREAS. DEWATERING
ACTIVITIES (IF NECESSARY) SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE
TO WDNR TECHNICAL STANDARD 1061.
b.INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL (EROSION MAT AND DITCH
CHECKS) TO STABILIZE AND LIMIT SEDIMENTATION OF
POND FROM ACTIVE AREAS UPSTREAM.
c.PROTECT POND OUTLET FROM SEDIMENT.
7)INSTALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DEWATERING ACTIVITIES (IF
NECESSARY) SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO WDNR
TECHNICAL STANDARD 1061.
8)MASS GRADE THE SITE PER PLAN. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL
AROUND ANY STOCKPILES, AND SEED AS REQUIRED. TOPSOIL,
SEED, MULCH, AND STABILIZE WITH EROSION MAT AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. THE STORMWATER POND MUST
BE GRADED AND OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO STRIPPING AND MASS
GRADING OPERATIONS.
9)EXCAVATE AND INSTALL FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
COMMUNITY CENTER, MANAGERIAL UNIT, STORAGE GARAGES,
AND GAZEBOS. FOUNDATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS AND
ADJACENT STORAGE SHEDS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PER PHASING
SHOWN ON PLAN.
10)INSTALL PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND INLETS. ALL INLETS
SHOULD UTILIZE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.
11)CONSTRUCT BUILDINGS PER PHASING SHOWN ON PLAN.
12)INSTALL SITE PERIMETER FENCING.
13)REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, SWALES,
DITCH/PIPE CHECKS, AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES) AFTER
70% VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION HAS OCCURRED. REMOVE AND
DISPOSE OF USED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
14)VERIFY POND DEPTH PER DESIGN. CLEANOUT POND
SEDIMENT WHICH ACCUMULATED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
POND LINER MUST REMAIN INTACT DURING ANY CLEANOUT
OPERATIONS, AND THE DREDGING OPERATION DOCUMENTED.
15)FUTURE PHASE CONSTRUCTION SHALL REFER TO THE SITE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES
SHALL BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM OF ANY PROPOSED LAND
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TO LIMIT SEDIMENTATION OF THE
STORMWATER POND.
REZONE/GDP/SIP
0 W. PACKER AVE
PC: 6-07-2022
EA PROPERTIES LLC
6057 COCOS DR
FORT MYERS, FL 33908
VERVE A CREDIT UNION
PO BOX 3046
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
JOHN ZELLMER
PO BOX 126
WINNEBAGO, WI 54985
LYNN C/RUTH E RETZLAFF LIVING TRUST
1891 SCARLET OAK TRL
OSHKOSH, WI 54904
OSHKOSH KENNEL CLUB INC
PO BOX 2841
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
TOWN OF OSHKOSH
1076 COZY LN
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
457 W 12TH AVE LLC
1505 MARQUETTE AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
HIS CHURCH WORLD OUTREACH INC
1704 JACKSON ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
NELS H NASLUND
2465 WESTHAVEN CT
OSHKOSH, WI 54904
CHET WESENBERG ARCHITECT LLC
240 AGLOMA BLVD SUITE A
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC
PO BOX 1433
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
Oshkosh City LimitOshkosh City Limit
W PACKER AVW PACKER AV
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 3/30/2022
1 in = 120 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯0 W PACKER AVE0 W PACKER AVE
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
HI
SR-9
I
I
UI
HI
SMU
SMU
SMU
SR-3
DR-6
MR-20-PD
SR-3
UI
SMU
UI
MR-20
MR-20
MR-12
UI
MR-12
DR-6
MR-20-PD
SMU
SMU-PDSR-5
SR-2
Oshkosh City LimitOshkosh City Limit
N MAIN ST
N MAIN ST
JACKSON ST
JACKSON ST
HARRISON ST
HARRISON ST
W SMITH AVW SMITH AV
W PACKER AVW PACKER AV
WISCONSIN ST
WISCONSIN ST
ALLEN AVALLEN AV
LIBBEY AVLIBBEY AV
E SMITH AVE SMITH AV
E PACKER AVE PACKER AV
ASHLAND ST
ASHLAND ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON STBACON AVBACON AV
COMET ST
COMET ST
GENEVA ST
GENEVA ST
HEARTHSTONE DR
HEARTHSTONE DR
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 3/30/2022
1 in = 500 ft1 in = 0.09 mi¯0 W PACKER AVE0 W PACKER AVE
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 3/30/2022
1 in = 100 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯0 W PACKER AVE0 W PACKER AVE
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer