HomeMy WebLinkAbout12. 22-09JANUARY 11, 2022 22-09 ORDINANCE
FIRST READING
(CARRIED________LOST________LAID OVER________WITHDRAWN________)
PURPOSE: APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE
DISTRICT (SMU) TO SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SMU-PD) FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 580 SOUTH KOELLER STREET
INITIATED BY: GC OSHKOSH HOLDINGS, LLC
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved
A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30-
387 OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS.
The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. That Section 30-387 of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to
Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by changing the
district character of the property located at 580 South Koeller Street from Suburban Mixed
Use District (SMU) to Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay
(SMU-PD).
PART OF RIVER VALLEY CORRAL CONDOMINIUM RECORDED AS DOCUMENT
NUMBER 1461181, WINNEBAGO COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS AND ½ OF
ADJACENT S. KOELLER STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL LOCATED IN THE
SOUTHWEST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH,
RANGE 16 EAST, CITY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN
BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF
SAID SECTION 22; THENCE S88°44’16”E, 641.20 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 22 TO A POINT; THENCE N00°53’00”E, 546.49 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RIVER VALLEY CORRAL CONDOMINIUM AND POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE N88°44’16”W, 362.05 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
JANAURY 11, 2022 22-09 ORDINANCE
FIRST READING CONT’D
SAID CONDOMINIUM TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.
KOELLER STREET AND THE BEGINNING OF A 1,105.92-FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO
THE RIGHT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A 1,105.92-FOOT RADIUS, 251.19
FEET ALONG CURVE TO WHOSE CHORD BEARS N09°46’08”W, 250.65 FEET;
THENCE S88°46’55”E, 313.49 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 01°13’05”E, 14.50 FEET TO
A POINT; THENCE S89°05’03”E, 94.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID
CONDOMINIUM; THENCE S00°53’00”W, 261.34 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 97,426 SQUARE FEET
OR 2.237 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication.
SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh
enacted Ordinance #22-XXX ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE
DISTRICT (SMU) TO SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SMU-PD) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 580 SOUTH
KOELLER STREET on January 25, 2022. This ordinance changes the zoning of the
property located at 580 South Koeller Street from Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU)
to Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD). The
full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the Office of the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave.
and on the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us. Clerk's phone: (920) 236-5011.
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons, Planning Services Manager
DATE: January 6, 2022
RE: Approve Zone Change from Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) to Suburban
Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD) for Property
Located at 580 South Koeller Street
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) to
Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD). The subject area
consists of a commercial condo lot including a strip mall on the northern portion of the site and
restaurant building (Golden Corral) on the southern portion of the lot. The site is zoned
Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU). The surrounding area consists of commercial uses to the
north and south, residential and institutional uses to the east, and Interstate 41 to the west. The
2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plans recommends Interstate Commercial use for the subject
area.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a Planned Development Overlay for the
southern portion of the parcel (proposed 2 new lots). This request is intended to provide some
flexibility to the zoning ordinance to accommodate redevelopment of the restaurant (Golden
Corral) site. Staff is supportive of the proposed rezone as it will also assist with redevelopment
of the site and provide further review to mitigate potential impacts on neighboring properties.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the zone change on January 4, 2022. Please see
the attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved:
Mark Lyons Mark A. Rohloff
Planning Services Manager City Manager
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM SUBURBAN MIXED USE
DISTRICT (SMU) TO SUBURBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SMU-PD) AND APPROVAL OF A
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 580 S
KOELLER STREET
Plan Commission meeting of January 4, 2022.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Henry C. Klover
Property Owner: GC Oshkosh Holdings, LLC
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) to
Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD). The applicant
also requests approval of General Development Plan for a commercial development.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning
from one classification to another but relies on the Comprehensive Plan and good planning
principles. Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Background Information:
The subject area consists of a commercial condo lot including a strip mall on the northern portion
of the site and restaurant building (Golden Coral) on the southern portion of the lot. The site is
zoned Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU). The surrounding area consists of commercial uses to
the north and south, residential and institutional uses to the east, and Interstate 41 to the west.
The 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plans recommends Interstate Commercial use for the subject
area.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use Zoning
Commercial SMU
Recognized Neighborhood Organizations
None
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 2
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing Uses Zoning
North Commercial SMU
South Commercial SMU
East Residential & Institutional MR-12
West Interstate-41 SMU
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
2040 Comprehensive Land Use Recommendation Interstate Commercial
ANALYSIS
Zone Change
The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a Planned Development Overlay for the
southern portion of the parcel (proposed new lots). This request is intended to provide some
flexibility to the zoning ordinance to accommodate redevelopment of the restaurant (Golden
Coral) site. The applicant has submitted preliminary plans for commercial development of the
property, which will be addressed as General Development Plan (GDP) review to follow.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 3
Staff is supportive of the proposed rezone as it will also assist redevelopment of the site and
provide further review to mitigate potential impacts on neighboring properties.
Use/Site Design
The applicant is proposing to divide the subject parcel into three commercial lots, with the
existing strip mall remaining on the northern lot and the existing restaurant being demolished for
development of two new commercial lots to the south of the strip mall. A CSM will be required to
divide the existing parcel. As proposed, the two commercial sites will both be drive-thru
restaurants with a shared access off of S. Koeller St. as well as shared access drive from the
neighboring property to the south, which will require cross access agreement.
With approval of the rezone, the applicant is requesting a base standard modification (BSM) for
increased parking on both lots. The site plan shows 50 stalls on Lot 1 (Panda Express) and 56
stalls on Lot 2 (future drive-thru), where code allows a maximum of 25 parking stalls for both
lots. According to the applicant, the increased parking is needed to accommodate expected
interior seating (48 seats – Panda Express) as well as drive-thru waiting spaces. The proposed
number of parking stalls is more than doubles the code maximum. Staff is continuing to work
with the applicant on obtaining additional information on the parking needs of the development
and potential existing cross parking agreement with adjacent developments. Any potential BSM
will be addressed as part of the SIP phase once all information is available.
A base standard modification will also be needed for the drive-thru lane for the future drive-thru
restaurant as the stacking length is less than 100’ in front of each order station. This may also be
addressed during the SIP phase. The site plan appears to be compliant with all other dimensional
requirements.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 4
Signage
Sign renderings were not included with this request, however the submitted site plan shows a
monument sign on the northern drive-thru restaurant site (Panda Express) as well as a drive-thru
menu board for each of the drive-thru lanes. As shown, the signage meet setback requirements.
The applicant is requesting a BSM to allow more than one daily notice sign for both restaurants to
accommodate menu boards for double drive-thru lanes on both sites. Staff is supportive of the
proposed second daily notice sign for both sites as they are needed for the double drive-thru
lanes. The BSM will be addressed as part of the SIP phase.
Landscaping
A landscape plan was included with the submittal. The plan will need to be amended to meet
building foundation landscaping requirements for both buildings, include medium trees along
the street frontage, and meet paved area and yard landscaping requirements. Landscaping
and/or fencing will also need to be provided along the east property line to meet the 0.3 opacity
bufferyard requirement. The applicant will need to meet all landscaping requirements or apply
for base standard modifications as part of the SIP process.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 5
Storm Water Management/Utilities
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the plans and noted that a cross access/drainage
easement is required and separate water laterals are required for the separate parcels. This will
be addressed during the SIP and Site Plan Review processes.
Site Lighting
A photometric lighting plan has been submitted for Lot 1 (Panda Express) that meets the
minimum 0.4 fc lighting requirement for all parking/drive areas and not exceeding the maximum
0.5 fc lighting level at the property lines. The plan notes a light fixture mounting height of 22’,
exceeding the maximum mounting height of 20’. However, the light fixtures may be mounted at
up to 23’ if to accommodate a light pole base. Final lighting plans will be required to be
submitted as part of the SIP request.
Building Facades
Building elevation plans were submitted for the Panda Express site. All facades are short of the
minimum 50% class I materials required by the City’s commercial design standards. The
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 6
applicant will need to increase the class I material allotment for all facades or apply for a BSM to
allow alternative materials. This will be address addressed during the SIP phase.
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 7
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned
Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based
on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose and
intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to determine
such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired relationships
between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts in the environs
of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and adequate
buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
Staff recommends approval of the Rezone and General Development Plan with the findings listed
above and the following conditions:
1. A Certified Survey Map (CSM) shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Community Development prior to finalization of the zone change.
2. Cross access agreement for shared driveways shall be filed with the Winnebago County
Register of Deeds.
3. All requested base standard modifications (BSM) will be addressed as part of the Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) application.
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the rezone and General Development Plan on
January 4, 2022. The following is their discussion on the item.
Site Inspections Report: Ms. Scheuermann, Mr. Perry and Mr. Mitchell reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 8
The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) to
Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay (SMU-PD). The applicant
also requests approval of General Development Plan for a commercial development.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a
Planned Development Overlay for the southern portion of the parcel (proposed new lots). This
request is intended to provide some flexibility to the zoning ordinance to accommodate
redevelopment of the restaurant (Golden Coral) site. The applicant has submitted preliminary
plans for commercial development of the property, which will be addressed as General
Development Plan (GDP) review to follow. Staff is supportive of the proposed rezone as it will
also assist redevelopment of the site and provide further review to mitigate potential impacts on
neighboring properties. Staff recommends approval with the findings and conditions as stated in
the staff report.
Ms. Propp opened up technical questions to staff.
Mr. Perry stated on the plan there is access not through the properties themselves, but through
both adjoining properties and wants to know if that is acceptable.
Mr. Lyons said that to the north is the existing access into the current larger lot so they will have
to do an interior access agreement as part of their CSM. The owner of that is working with the
client. The property to the south would have to be contacted to work on the southern joint access.
That section of Koeller Street, staff does support using those cross access over adding curb cuts
onto Koeller. If we can minimize those curbs and use the internal access drive system it is
probably a better overall end product.
Mr. Perry asked if zoning goes from a use that does not include drive-throughs, changing the
zoning does allow the drive-throughs.
Mr. Lyons they are only adding the plan development overlay, we are already a base SMU zoning
district here.
Mr. Mitchell asked for clarification on why they want to have twice as many parking sports as
would be permitted by our standard code.
Mr. Slusarek said that it’s about 50 stalls for both lots and per lot they would be allowed 25
parking spaces.
Mr. Mitchell asked if they were to approve this, are there tradeoffs.
Mr. Slusarek said they would be required to offset those BSMs and landscaping is an example.
Ms. Scheuermann said that there’s 50 parking stalls there today, and there is going to be two
developments with 25 each. So that is not twice the parking stalls.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 9
Mr. Lyons said the proposal is 50 on the Panda Express lot and 56 on the unidentified southern
lot. The code says 25. For small buildings, we do not calculate the 125%. If there is a parking lot
that is below 25 stalls, they are allowed to go up to 25. If it was at code, it would be at 12. Because
it is a small building, they are allowed up to 25.
Ms. Scheuermann asked if a drive-through restaurant need 50 spots.
Mr. Lyons said that staff took a look at what developments have gone in since 2017. 2017 is when
the code was updated. Some have shared parking. Pot Belly has 30 space on site with a 2100
square foot building. Part of those 30 spaces is shared parking with the previous box store behind
them. That had about 1 space per 70 square feet of building area. Chick-Fil-A has 129 spaces, but
that is part of a three building multi-tenant center. Only 9 of their stalls were actually added
specifically for them. Popeye’s is a 2600 square foot fast food restaurant that has 11 parking
spaces, or about 1 parking space per 239 square feet. The old Packers Pub site is looking at 15
spaces for 2400 square foot building that are about 1 per 160 square feet. The proposed Panda
Express is 50 spaces for 2500 square foot building or about 1 space per 50 square feet.
Ms. Davey asked why do they need so much parking.
Mr. Lyons said they are trying to work with them between now and SIP to get additional
information on why they need it. We have been made aware that there may be an existing shared
parking agreement with the building on the north. We are working on trying to get that
additional documentation to help justify that additional parking.
Ms. Propp asked if because there are concerns with the parking, and they approve the general
development plan, said plan can be reduced in parking.
Mr. Lyons said they could do an amended GDP and SIP to have this discussion with Plan
Commission. There have been lengthy conversations with them about the amount of stalls. If it
does significantly change between now and SIP, there would be an amended GDP and SIP before
the approval process.
Ms. Propp asked if the main access would be through the current driveway cut which had led to
the Golden Corral on one side and the strip mall on the north.
Mr. Lyons said that is correct.
Ms. Propp said she doesn’t like that entry because it’s got a rumble strip and the rumble strip
makes it difficult to turn in appropriately. She would prefer to not have a rumble strip there
because it is easier for cars to enter and exit. The driveway needs to be engineered appropriately
and it looks like the entrance to the south side to these new drive-throughs is pretty close to
Koeller.
Mr. Lyons said that it can be discussed with the applicant and the engineering department.
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 10
Ms. Scheuermann asked when the SIP will be coming to Plan Commission.
Mr. Lyons said to defer to the applicant since they have not filed yet.
Ms. Propp asked for any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any
statements.
Ryan Talbott and Xavier Gavin, Klover Architects, said that with regards to the parking
requirement, the total operations for the Panda Express has increased in the drive-through
operations. Oftentimes the drive-through queuing will get backed up. Cars will typically be asked
to pull through and wait. That has taken some of the parking of the 50 stalls being proposed as
well as some 3rd party pick up services that are becoming increasingly popular has eaten into the
typically parking count. We are working with Brian and Kelly on providing documentation for
SIP.
Mr. Perry asked why the applicant didn’t choose to bring this up in a workshop. There are
multiple concerns.
Mr. Gavin said that this development went to the pre-application process with Todd Muehrer
and we have scheduled the GDP at the direction of the departments at the time.
Mr. Lyons said that all of the pre-submittal meetings we do offer a workshop to individuals so
they have the option to workshop or move forward with filing.
There were no public comments on this item.
Ms. Propp closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
There were no closing statements from the applicant.
Motion by Kiefer to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Seconded by Marshall.
Mr. Perry said that driving into that access point stinks. Something needs to be addressed with
that. They are concerned about the amount of parking spaces. If there has to be a drive-through it
doesn’t appear to be adequate and then because of the drive-throughs and the special
considerations that will eventually be needed due to them, there are great concerns if the
buildings were not up to code with landscaping, lighting, type 1 materials. Is it even appropriate
now to come to Plan Commission for a general development plan.
Mr. Kiefer said the site is difficult to get into, the rate of speed of traffic coming off that
roundabout and coming through there. It would have been nice to have had a chance to look at
ITEM III: Rezone & GDP 580 S Koeller St. 11
this a little bit closer and in more detail before this point. We can come back to these things.
Hopefully staff will have some times to work with the developer to address some of the concerns.
Council Member Ford asked if staff could explain the process, when it comes back to us again,
what that would mean.
Mr. Lyons said that the processes are plated split into two steps. The first is GDP or general
development plan. It's taking a concept plan and making sure the appropriate base zoning and
land uses are approved. Our specific implementation plan is the 2nd step and that's really just as
the title says, it's the specific details of the plan. When an SIP comes forward, we need to have full
lighting, landscaping site design, building elevations as construction ready to review, make sure
it’s compliant with all codes and at that time is when we evaluate potential based standard
modifications and anything that an applicant is willing to do we're proposing to do offset any of
those base standard asks. The nice thing about separate in that process is if this would move
forward tonight, the GDP/zone change to be approved, there's nothing to stop us from continuing
to work with the applicant and bring this back as a workshop before we come back with SIP.
There’s nothing in the code that says you have to directly go to SIP.
Council Member Ford said that if we approved the land usage, there is still an opportunity to
workshop to address some of the concerns that Mr. Perry or others might have.
Mr. Lyons said that is correct.
Ms. Propp said that there should be a workshop. There is too much wrong with this layout. With
the materials not being up to speed, and parking issues that haven’t been resolved. I will support
this based on Mark’s comments that we could ask that there be a workshop on this before the SIP
comes forward.
Motion carried 9-0.
PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLU/E U/E U/E U/E U/E U/E U/E U/ER/WR/WU/E U/E U/E U/E U/E
U/E U/E U/E U/E U/E
PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/EU/ER/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL
PL PL PL PLR/WDYH DYH
HT
T
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL
S89° 05' 03"E
94.81'
S88° 46' 55"E
313.49'
N01° 13' 05"E
14.50'S00° 53' 00"W261.34'N88° 44' 16"W
362.05'
L= 251.19'
R= 1105.92'
N09° 46' 08"W
CH = 250.65'
D=013°00'50"
ARCH PROJECT #:
PANDA PROJECT #:
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS:
All ideas, designs, arrangement and plans indicated or
represented by this drawing are the property of Panda
Express Inc. and were created for use on this specific project.
None of these ideas, designs, arrangements or plans may be
used by or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation
without the written permission of Panda Express Inc.
1683 Walnut Grove Ave.
Rosemead, California
91770
Telephone: 626.799.9898
Facsimile: 626.372.8288
PANDA EXPRESS, INC.
CONDITIONAL USE 10-22-21
PANDA STORE #:
TRUE WARM & WELCOME 2300 R5
21044.016
-
S8-21-D8662
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
9TH AVE. & KOELLER ST.
TRUE WARM & WELCOME
PANDA EXPRESS
1ST
8813 Penrose Lane, Suite 400,
Lenexa, KS 66219
ph: 913.649.8181 • fx: 913.649.1275
N
LOT 1 SITE DATA
SITE
SITE AREA:1.11 AC
48,214SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA:35,997 SF(74.7%)
BUILDING AREA 2500 SF
PARKING
PARKING PROVIDED:54 STANDARD
3 HANDICAP (1 VAN)
PARKING REQUIRED: 8 SPACES
(1 SPACE PER 300 SF)
ZONING
SMU (SUBURBAN MIXED-USE)
9.00'
TYP.18.50'TYP.10
3
22
11
17
9
12
18
9
S. KOELLER ST.PROPOSED PANDA EXPRESS
2500 SF
CIVIL ENGINEER
BRUNGARDT HONOMICHL & COMPANY, P.A.
7101 COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SUITE 400
OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 66210
P (913) 663-1900
CONTACT:KURT YODER, PE
EMAIL:KURT.YODER@IBHC.COM
SURVEYOR OF RECORD
EXCEL ENGINEERING, INC.
100 CAMELOT DR.
FOND DU LAC, WI 54935
P (920) 926-9800
CONTACT:RYAN WILGREEN, PLS
EMAIL:RYAN.W@EXCELENGINEER.COM
PROPOSED FUTURE DRIVE-THRU
3027 SF
ARCHITECT
KLOVER ARCHITECTS, INC.
8813 PENROSE LANE, SUITE 400
LENEXA, KS 66219
P (913) 649-8181
CONTACT:XAVIER GAVIN
EMAIL:XAVIER.GAVIN@KLOVER.NET
00 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
01 LEAD FREE, WATER-BORNE EMULSION BASED WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT FOR
PARKING LOT STALL STRIPING (TYP.).
02 DUMPSTER AND SCREENING ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS
03 MENU BOARD. SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS
04 SPEAKER BOX. SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS
05 DRIVE THRU CLEARANCE BAR. SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS
06 ADA PARKING AREA. 2% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION.
07 RUBBER WHEEL STOPS
08 CONCRETE SIDEWALK
09 MONUMENT SIGN
C1
SITE PLAN
JLA
02
02
01
01
01
01
03 04
03
04
03
04
03
04
05
0506
06
07
07
08
08
10' SETBACK 25' SETBACK25' SETBACK10' SETBACK
10' SETBACK
12' UTILITY
EASEMENT
12' UTILITYEASEMENT15' UTILITYEASEMENTCOMMON ELEMENT PER PLAT
PROPOSED LOT
SPLIT LINE
2
LOT 2 SITE DATA
SITE
SITE AREA:1.13 AC
49,213SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA:32,887 SF(66.8%)
BUILDING AREA 3027 SF
PARKING
PARKING PROVIDED:53 STANDARD
3 HANDICAP (1 VAN)
PARKING REQUIRED: 10 SPACES
(1 SPACE PER 300 SF)
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Below is the existing property description. This does not
include the proposed lot split.
8nit 80 $ddenduP 1o. 1 to 5iYer 9Dlley &orrDl
&ondoPiniuP D condoPiniuP Dccording to the
'eclDrDtion oI &ondoPinuP recorded in 'ocuPent 1o.
19399 Dnd DPendPents thereto together with sDid
8nit
s DppurtenDnt 0 undiYided interest in Dnd to the
coPPon elePents thereto &ity oI 2shNosh :inneEDgo
&ounty :isconsin
$313Drcel ,' s 901120000
TDx 0Dp ,' s 901120000
3roperty $ddress 80 6 .oeller 6treet
2shNosh :, 902
PROP
O
S
E
D
L
O
T
1
PROPO
S
E
D
L
O
T
2
09
SITE LEGEND
PROPOSED BUILDING
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER
PARKING STALL COUNT#
EXISTING SUBJECT PROPERTY LINEPL
PROPOSED SUBJECT PROPERTY LINEPL
EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINER/W
ACCESS EASEMENT
UTILITY EASEMENTU/E
WOOD FENCE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
SETBACK LINE
Rezone/GDP
580 S KOELLER ST
PC: 01-04-22
JAMES P RUDOLPH
1752 W 5TH AVE C
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
DIETER S PRESSER
1501 W 7TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHILD
CENTER INC
3870 JACKSON ST
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
BRANDON C/SUMMER L
BJARNARSON
1771 W 5TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
KIM J/LORI A BUCK
1773 W 5TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
NOREEN KIRCHHOFF
1775 W 5TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
SUSAN M DENNING
1777 W 5TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
JOHANN KOPEINIG
1779 W 5TH AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54902
600 S KOELLER STREET LLC
PO BOX 52427
ATLANTA, GA 30355
PETER M FREDERIKSEN ETAL
691 S GREEN BAY RD #208
NEENAH, WI 54956
OLD NATIONAL BANK
PO BOX 718
EVANSVILLE, IN 47705
HENRY C KLOVER
8813 PENROSE LANE SUITE 400
LENEXA, KS 66219
GC OSHKOSH HOLDINGS LLC
1621 CONGRESS AVE
OSHKOSH, WI 54901
!"#$41!"#$41
SSKKOOEELLLLEERRSSTTWW 77TTHH AAVV
W 5TH AVW 5TH AVWW1155TTHHAAVV
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 12/21/2021
1 in = 120 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯580 S KOELLER ST580 S KOELLER ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
SMU
I
SR-5
I
I
SMU-PDI
DR-6
MR-12
I
I
MR-12
SMU-PD
MR-12
SMU-PD
I-PD
SR-5
DR-6 SMU-PD
DR-6
SR-5
MR-12
MR-12
SMU-PD
NMU
!"#$41
!"#$41
WITZEL AVWITZEL AV
SSWWAASSHHBBUURRNNSSTTWW 99TTHH AAVV
SSKKOOEELLLLEERRSSTTREICHOW STREICHOW STW 5TH AVW 5TH AV
S WESTFIELD STS WESTFIELD STLILAC STLILAC STARMORY PLARMORY PLABBEY AVABBEY AV
W 7TH AVW 7TH AV
W 6TH AVW 6TH AV
MMOORREELLAANNDD SS TT
WINDSOR STWINDSOR STBISMARCK AVBISMARCK AV
CRYSTAL SPRINGS AVCRYSTAL SPRINGS AVS WESTFIELD STS WESTFIELD STW 7TH AVW 7TH AVWW77TTHHAAVV
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 12/21/2021
1 in = 500 ft1 in = 0.09 mi¯580 S KOELLER ST580 S KOELLER ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 12/21/2021
1 in = 100 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯580 S KOELLER ST580 S KOELLER ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer