HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem VII
PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 6, 2021
ITEM VII: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT & SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPROVAL FOR A MULTI-FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JACKSON
STREET & MARION ROAD
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Merge, LLC / Merge Urban Development
Property Owner: Mackson Corners Waterfront LLC
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests approval of a General Development Plan amendment and Specific
Implementation Plan to allow for a multi-family residential development located at
redevelopment site J, at the southwest corner of Jackson Street and Marion Road.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Type:
The subject site is a 2.62 acre irregularly shaped vacant lot, located at the southwest corner of
Jackson Street and Marion Road. The property is zoned Riverfront Mixed Use with a Planned
Development Overlay and Riverfront Overlay (RMU-PD-RFO) and the 2040 Comprehensive
Land Use Plan recommends City Center use for the subject site. The surrounding area consists
primarily of commercial uses as well as a multi-family use to the west along with the Riverwalk
and the Fox River to the south
Subject Site
Existing Land Use Zoning
Vacant lot RMU-PD-RFO
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing Uses Zoning
North Commercial UMU-PD
South Riverwalk I-PD-RFO
East Commercial CMU-RFO
West Multi-family RMU-PD-RFO
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
2040 Land Use Recommendation Center City
Page 1
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 2
ANALYSIS
On May 14, 2019, a General Development Plan (GDP) was approved for multi-use
developments located at Marion Road Redevelopment Sites H, I and J. This request only
pertains to Phase 1 development of Site J.
Use
The proposed Phase 1 development will include a 4-story, 74 unit apartment building with a
total of 90 bedrooms (1.21 bedrooms per unit). Density for the site is approximately 28.2 units
per acre. The RMU District allows for 1,200 sq. ft. per dwelling unit, which results in a
maximum of 95 dwelling units for the site. The Phase I development is under the maximum of
density for the entire site.
The General Development Plan (GDP) for the site listed the Phase I building (Building 2) as a 5-
story multi-use building. The proposed change to a 4-story multi-family use requires a GDP
amendment. Staff is supportive of the GDP amendment as the proposed use still be compatible
with the overall approved GDP as well as the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
recommendation of Center City.
Site Design/Access
Proposed site plan.
Page 2
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 3
The site will have a single two-way access from Marion Road. A total of 90 parking spaces will
be provided for the site (34 underground spaces, 56 surface spaces). The total number of
parking spaces does not meet the minimum of 2 spaces per dwelling unit containing 0-2
bedrooms, plus 0.5 space per additional bedroom over 2 bedrooms per unit, and 1 guest
parking space for every 3 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting a BSM for the reduced
parking number. The applicant has noted that the proposed 90 parking spaces are consistent
with the approved GDP, which included shared parking for Sites H, I, and J totaling 270
parking spaces. The applicant further noted that 117 parking spaces provided for Site H (Brio)
along with the proposed 90 spaces on Site J and 94 expected parking spaces on future Site I
result in 301 total spaces for the three sites will provide adequate parking given the typology of
the mixed-use development in combination with residents mostly utilizing one vehicle unit
(based on other similar projects). Staff is supportive of the reduced parking as each unit will be
provided at least one parking space and the majority of the units will be one-bedroom or
studios. Also, the site is centrally located and the area is relatively walkable.
The total impervious surface ratio for Phase 1 will be 48%, which is well under the maximum of
80% for the RMU district.
Required Provided
Parking Spaces Minimum: 172 90
Impervious Surface Maximum: 80% 48%
Building Height Maximum: None 51.5 ft.
Setbacks Minimum Provided
Front Setback (Marion Rd.) 10 ft. 12 ft. (parking lot)
Street Side Setback (Jackson
St.) 10 ft. ~74 ft. (pavement)
Waterfront (south)
30 ft. from
Ordinary High
Water Mark
37 ft. from Ordinary High
Water Mark
Side (west) 10 ft. 10 ft.
The building and paved areas for Phase 1 are meeting all applicable setbacks. Multi-family uses
are required to provide outdoor recreation space. A BSM is needed to waive this requirement.
Staff is supportive of this BSM as the site has access to the Riverwalk for recreation purposed.
Also, the site is located in a walkable urban area and with predominantly studio/1-bedroom
units, the residents will be primarily adults.
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was conducted for the site and recommended a mid-block
crossing on Marion Road between Jackson and Campus Place. Staff will further
evaluate the viability and location of a mid-block crossing. The site plan shows
connections to the Riverwalk from the development. Staff is recommending a condition that an
easement be drafted and recorded with the Winnebago County Register of Deeds for any
Page 3
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 4
connections to City-owned property.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
The applicant has been in discussion with the Department of Public Works regarding storm
water management for the area. Finalized storm water management plans will need to be
submitted and approved as part of the Site Plan Review processes.
Landscaping
Proposed landscaping plan.
Page 4
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 5
Points Required Points Provided
Building Foundation
488 (244 on side of main
entrance, 122 on street facing
side)
487
(131 on side of main entrance,
19 on street facing side)
Paved Area 280 (84 tall trees, 112 shrubs) 576
(350 tall trees, 210 shrubs)
Street Frontage
(Marion Rd.) 330 (165 medium trees) Not provided
Street Frontage
(Jackson St.) 430 (215 medium trees) Not provided
Yards 1,545 1,510
Total 3,073 2,573
Building Foundation
The landscape plan is one point shy of the total point requirement for the building foundation.
The landscaping ordinance also specifies that 25% must be on the side facing the public street
and 50% of the required points must be located along the main entrance side of the building.
The plans is not meeting either of these requirements.
Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the reduced building foundation landscaping point
requirement as it is only deficient by one point and the increased paved area points serve to
offset that minimal reduction. Staff is also supportive of a BSM for the reduced street facing
and main entrance side landscaping reduction as the street-facing (north) foundation will
mostly be screened by paved area/yard landscaping to the north of the building and the street-
facing (east) foundation is a relatively short end of the building which does not provide enough
façade length to meet the point requirement. The most prominent building elevation is the
waterfront façade, which staff feels is sufficiently landscaped around the foundation to meet the
intent of the ordinance.
Paved Area
The paved area requirement of 50 landscaping points per 10 parking stalls or 10,000 sq. ft. of
paved area is being more than doubled. The code further specifies 30% of all points will be
devoted to tall trees and 40% will be devoted to shrubs. Both of these point requirements are
being met.
Landscape planter islands are required at the ends of all parking rows, driveway entrances and
intermediate locations and each island shall include a tall deciduous/shade tree. The landscape
plan shows one parking row end missing a tree, at the southeast corner of the parking lot. The
applicant will need to provide a tree in this location to meet this requirement, and can be
addressed during the Site Plan Review process.
Page 5
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 6
Two transformer boxes and a generator pad are shown within parking row ends. This
mechanical equipment will need to be fully screened with evergreen shrubs or trees. This can
also be addressed during Site Plan Review.
Street Frontage
Code requires 100 landscape points per 100 feet of street frontage. The landscaping ordinance
also specifies that 50% of the required points must be devoted to medium trees. The applicant
is requesting a BSM to defer the street frontage planting requirement to Phase 2 of the
development. Staff is supportive this BSM with a condition that the required street frontage
landscaping be provided within 3 years.
Yards
Code requires 20 landscaping points per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The provided yard
landscaping is slightly short of meeting this requirement. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow
reduced yard landscaping points as is site constraints provide minimal available yard area for
additional plantings. Also, the scale and density of the development closely resemble that
found in the CMU district, which exempts landscaping requirements. This recommendation is
consistent with staff’s opinion discussed as part of the GDP request.
Signage
Signage plans were not included with this request. The applicant has stated that signage for the
project is anticipated to be building-mounted and is likely to include tenant signage that cannot
be defined at this time. Ground signage is not being requested. All sign will need to be
compliant with RMU signage standards. This can be addressed under a separate sign permit.
Temporary construction fencing is being proposed to enclose the site during construction, as
was utilized for the Brio site. The proposed fencing will be 6’ tall chain link and include a mesh
exterior which will include graphics pertaining to the development. A BSM will be required as
code does not allow signs to be attached to fences. Staff does not have concerns with the BSM
as the signage will only be displayed during construction.
Site Lighting
A photometric plan has been provided by the applicant. The provided plan does not exceed the
maximum 0.5 foot candle lighting level allowed at the property lines. Several areas of the
parking lot are under the minimum 0.4 fc lighting level. Lighting levels in these areas will need
to be increased to the minimum 0.4 fc. Proposed light fixture height is 18’, which is under the
maximum of 20’ for the RMU district.
The applicant has provided image of the proposed light fixtures/poles (shown below) for the
site lighting, which are double head cutoff fixtures. Staff is recommending that the applicant
revise their lighting plan to utilize ornamental light fixtures utilized for the existing Aurora site
to the north as well Site H (Brio). This will provide consistency for the character of the
development area.
Page 6
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 7
Building Facades
Page 7
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 8
Page 8
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 9
The Riverfront Overlay District Design Standards requires buildings to be clad on all sides with
at least 70% class I materials. It also requires residential uses to include windows and doors
areas at a minimum of 15% of the ground floor façade area. For upper floors, the total area of
windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 15% of the total façade area above the ground
floor.
The submitted building elevations are deficient of the code requirement for class I materials on
all facades. The applicant is requesting a BSM to allow “ceramic cladding” as a class I material
to meet the requirement on all facades. The applicant describes the material as being a ‘step up’
from the Nichiha fiber-cement cladding that was approved for Brio. The applicant also states
that the ceramic coating is more durable, has a 50-year warranty on the panels and 20-year
warranty on the finish. As this is a new material that has not previously reviewed or approved,
staff is recommending that Plan Commission analyze the material to determine if it is
appropriate to classify as a class I material.
The building facades meet window/door area requirements on all facades, with the exception of
the west ground floor. The applicant has noted that this glazing reduction is necessary to
screen the retaining wall, ramp, and mechanical and electrical equipment. Staff is supportive of
a BSM to allow the reduction as the west façade is minimally visible, facing the existing Anthem
Apartments and all other façade areas exceed 15% door/window area to offset the requested
Page 9
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 10
BSM. Also, landscaping features will be included along the façade to “break up” the ground
floor walls.
Required Class I Provided Class I
Class I with
Ceramic
Cladding
North 70% 40% 95%
South 70% 42% 94%
East 70% 48% 100%
West 70% 43% 100%
Required door/window
area
Provided door/window
area
North ground floor 15% 37%
North upper floors 15% 28%
South ground floor 15% 46%
South upper floors 15% 32%
East ground floor 15% 87%
East upper floors 15% 17%
West ground floor 15% 9%
West upper floors 15% 26%
The Riverfront Overlay District also specifies that a patio or balcony shall be provided for each
unit facing the waterfront. The applicant is requesting a BSM as not all units on the waterfront
(south) side of the building will be provided with a deck or patio. According to the applicant,
providing a balcony on each unit creates a design challenge by giving the appearance of
‘stacked’ balconies and the current design provides for a more aesthetically pleasing pattern on
the façade. They also note that it allows some of the water-facing units to be more attainably
priced without the added cost of a patio door and balcony. The units without a balcony have a
9’ wide by 8’ tall window in each living room. A roof terrace is also planned for the building
that would be open to all residents, giving everyone access to a space with a view of the river
regardless of the location of the unit within the building.
Staff is supportive of the proposed BSM as the waterfront façade will maintain the desired
waterfront connection with the proposed design. The variation of window sizes and balcony
placement serve to enhance the appearance of the façade. The waterfront façade significantly
exceeds the glazing requirement of 15% for both the ground floor and upper floor areas to offset
the requested BSM.
Overall Site
The applicant is requesting BSMs related to parking, landscaping, and exterior design
standards. To offset the landscaping code deficiencies the applicant has provided increased
parking lot landscaping as well as increased glazing on the building facades. Staff is
comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the requested BSMs and feels that the
overall site design is complimentary to the surrounding area.
Page 10
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 11
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned
Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings
based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to
determine such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts
in the environs of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and
adequate buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
(j) For Planned Development projects that are proposed to be developed in phases, the
applicant can provide a timeline for development and can demonstrate that the project
would be successful even if all phases were not or could not be completed.
Staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan amendment and Specific
Implementation Plan and the findings listed above with the proposed following conditions:
1. Connections from the site to City-owned property shall be addressed through an
easement to be recorded with the Winnebago County Register of Deeds or copy of
existing.
2. BSM to allow reduced number of parking spaces to 90 spaces.
3. BSM to allow multi-family use without outdoor recreation space.
4. BSM to allow reduced building foundation landscaping along street facing façade to 19
points.
5. BSM to allow reduced building foundation landscaping along main entrance façade to
131 points.
6. BSM to allow reduced yard landscaping points to 1,510 points.
Page 11
ITEM VII: GDP amdt. & SIP Jackson St../Marion Rd. 12
7. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view as approved by the Department
of Community Development.
8. Street frontage landscaping shall be installed as part of the Phase 2 development or
installed in conformation with the Landscape Ordinance within 3 years.
9. BSM to reduced door/window area on the west ground floor facade to 9%.
10. BSM to allow residential units facing the waterfront without functional patios or decks.
11. Final building exterior materials shall be approved by the Plan Commission.
12. BSM to allow temporary fencing with signage during construction of the site.
13. Final landscaping, lighting, and signage plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Department of Community Development.
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
TO: Brian Slusarek, Planner, City of Oshkosh
FROM: Rose Schroder, AICP, Bolton and Menk, Inc.
DATE: June 7, 2021
SUBJECT: SIP Submittal, Sites ‘I’ and ‘J’, Mackson Corners
This letter accompanies the applications for SIP review on sites known as Sites I and J,
Mackson Corners as included in previously considered GDP.
Site Description
This project is a mixed-use development that include a variety of waterfront residential units,
townhomes and mixed-use buildings. The first phase of construction will involve the waterfront
residential and associates parking facilities as shown on the phasing plan sheet.
The waterfront building is 4-story and includes 72 units, with enclosed basement level parking as
well as surface parking. An evaluation of parking can be found on the first page of the building
document set by Slingshot Architecture. Additional narrative about the themes and overall design
aesthetic and development program can be found throughout the pages of the same document
set.
Signage
Signage for the project is anticipated to be building-mounted and is likely to include tenant signage
that cannot be defined at this time. Signage can be expected to be of high-quality materials.
Detached signage is not currently requested.
Exceptions
One exception is requested as it relates to the GDP approved on 3/7/2019. The polan required a
‘yard’ planting point total of 4,048 points for the full-build of the site. The development team
proposed a reduced total of 1,700 pionts for the full site build out; of those points 190 points of
‘yard’ plant material would be installed on future phases of the project.
Please feel free to contact me at rose.schroder@bolton-menk.com or (515) 380-4396 for
additional information and/or to answer any questions that may arise during your review.
Page 16
A.102
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 417 MARION ROADOSHKOSH, WIMACKSON CORNERS WATERFRONT T 515-243-0074305 EAST COURT AVENUE, DES MOINES, IA 50309REVISION SCHEDULE
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
100% DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
2020.23
PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2021.04.20
KEYNOTE TEMPLATE
1.KEYNOTE TEXT
2.KEYNOTE TEXT
3.KEYNOTE TEXT
GENERAL KEYNOTE TEXT IF NECESSARY
Z
ST1
ST1ST1
160A
ST1
160B
160D160C160C
161A161ABN3BN3BN1
BN1 BN1 BN1
2
A.310
1
A.401
8'-0"62'-0"10'-0"
4A.201
2
A.201
3
A.201
61G
62B
STUDIO
110
REFER TO A.404
STUDIO
106
REFER TO A.404
2 BED
114
REFER TO A.414
LOBBY
160
RR
165
STORAGE
163
FITNESS
161
MAIL ROOM
162
1 BED
112
REFER TO A.405
1 BED
108
REFER TO A.405
1 BED
104
REFER TO A.405
1 BED+ WU
113
REFER TO A.409
MECH.
130
REFER TO A.402
BIKE
132
REFER TO A.401
TRASH CHUTE
131
REFER TO A.402
1 BED+ WU
111
REFER TO A.409
1 BED+ WU
109
REFER TO A.409
1 BED+ WU
107
REFER TO A.409
1 BED+ WU
105
REFER TO A.409
1 BED+ WU
103
REFER TO A.409
1 BED+ WU
101
REFER TO A.409
CORRIDOR
100
JANITOR
164
1 BED
102
REFER TO A.407
ABB B B B B
130A 132B
UE1UE1UE1UE1UE1UE1UE1ST2
131A UE UE UE UE UEUEUE
UE132A
UE
UEUEUEUEUEUEUE131B ST1F
B
1 10
C
8234567
D
E
9
A
ZZZZZ Z
2
A.311
8
A.508
1
A.201
S2
S2
S3
14141014
14
15
15
15
18 18 18 18 18 18 18
19 19 19 19 19 19 19
3
3
77
7
7
77
FE
33A
61 W61 W61 W61 W61 W
61 W62B
61W
61W
61W 61W 61W 61W 61W 61W
61X
61W
61 W
18
19
18
19
18
19
18
19
18
19
18
1919
16
14
14
2
FE
FE
4
60D 60F
STAIR 1
1003STAIR 2
0003
STAIR 1
150STAIR 2
151
ELEVATOR
152
2
A.301
4A.301 3A.3012A.3025A.302
FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES
1.PRE-FINISHED METAL BALCONY. 6’x10’ BALCONIES AT 2-BEDROOM UNITS ONLY. 6’x8’
BALCONIES AT ALL OTHER UNITS WHERE SHOWN.
2.OVERHANG ABOVE
3.ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED CANOPY + SOLAR SHADING.
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS
4.ELECTRICAL METERS
5.GARAGE EXHAUST VENT - SEE MEP
6.CAST-IN-PLACE COLUMNS - REFER TO A.501 FOR FIRE RATINGS
7.STEEL COLUMNS - REFER TO A.501 FOR FIRE RATINGS
8.WHEEL STOP, ONE PER RUN, TYP.
9.PAINTED PARKING STRIPING
10.PARKING GARAGE RAMP
11.PARKING DRAINAGE - SEE CIVIL/MEP
12.ACCESSIBLE ACCESS LANE
13.TRENCH DRAIN
14.CAST IN PLACE RETAINING WALL - SEE STRUCTURAL
15.CONCRETE STAIRS + LANDINGS - REFER TO CIVIL
16.ACCESSIBLE RAMP MAX SLOPE 5%. MAX RISE OF 30” PER RUN. PROVIDE FALL
PROTECTION CURB ON RAMP 4” ABOVE RAMP SURFACE
17.PAINTED SURFACE STRIPPING
18.PRE-FINISHED GUARDRAIL WITH WOOD INSERTS
19.PRE-FINISHED STEEL STAIRS
20.SMOKE CURTAIN LEVELS 1.5 - 4
21.BOLLARD - SEE CIVIL
22.WALK-UP UNIT ROOF BELOW
FE. RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET LOCATION
GENERAL KEYNOTES
1.ARCHITECTURAL LEVEL (1) 0’-0” = XX’ CIVIL FFE
2.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO OUTSIDE FACE
OF SHEATHING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
3.ALL CORRIDOR AND DEMISING WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO
CENTERLINE OF STUD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
4.REFER TO THE A.400 SHEETS FOR ALL INTERIOR FLOOR PLANS
5.ALL GWB WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED P-1 UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
6.ALL GWB WALLS TO HAVE PAINTED WOOD BASE UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
7.ALL INTERIOR UNIT WALLS ARE 60A UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE
8.REFER TO A.501 FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ASSEMBLY
INFORMATION
9.REFER TO A.601. FOR DOOR SCHEDULE, WINDOW, AND
STOREFRONT ELEVATIONS.
10.ALL SITE WORK INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO
CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR COMPLETE SITE SCOPE AND DETAILING
11.REFER TO A.400’S FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE GRAB BAR & SOLID
BLOCKING LOCATIONS
N
N
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A.102
Page 17
SIP
SW CORNER MARION/JACKSON ST
PC: 07-06-2021
CITY OF OSHKOSH
PO BOX 1130
OSHKOSH, WI 54903
ANTHEM LUXURY LIVING LLC
5160 EXPO DR
MANITOWOC, WI 54220
MACKSON CORNERS WATERFRONT
LLC
604 CLAY ST
CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613
Page 18
JACKSON STJACKSON STMMAARRIIOONN RRDD
DIVISION STDIVISION STC:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 6/17/2021
1 in = 120 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯SW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON STSW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
Page 19
I
TR-10
CMU
I-PD
UMU-PD
RMU-PD-RFO
UMU I
I
I-UTO
CMU-RFO
CMU
UMU
I-PD
I
RMU-PD-RFO
CMU
HI
MR-36-UTO
UI-RFO
UMU-PD-UTO
RMU
I
RMU-RFO
UMU
I
TR-10-PD
I-PD-RFO
TR-10
I
CMU-PD
I-PD
I
CMU
UMU-PD
CMU-PD
I-PD
RMU-PD
TR-10-PD
UMU-UTO
I-PD
I-PD
I-PD-RFO
UMU
UMU-UTO
UMU
RMU-PD
I-RFO
CMU-PD
CMU-PD-RFO
CMU
UMU
RMU
RMU-PD
I-PD-UTO
RMU-PD
UMU
I-PD-RFO
I
UMU-PD-UTO
CMU-PD
CMU
UMU-UTO
I-PD
RMU-PD
HIGH AV
HIGH AV
W 9TH AVW 9TH AV N MAIN STN MAIN STJACKSON STJACKSON STALGOMA BLVD
ALGOMA BLVD
OREGON STOREGON STWISCONSIN STWISCONSIN STS MAIN STS MAIN STPPEEAARRLLAAVV
W 7TH AVW 7TH AV
W 6TH AVW 6TH AV
W 8TH AVW 8TH AV DDIIVVIISSIIOONNSSTTCHURCH AV
CHURCH AV
MMAARRIIOONNRRDD
MICHIGAN STMICHIGAN STIOWA STIOWA STJEFFERSON STJEFFERSON STW 5TH AVW 5TH AV
NEBRASKA STNEBRASKA STW 4TH AVW 4TH AV
MINNESOTA STMINNESOTA STCAMPUS PL
CAMPUS PL
MARKET STMARKET STCOMMERCE STCOMMERCE STOSCEOLA STOSCEOLA STCEAPE AVCEAPE AV
MULTIPLE
UMU-PD
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 6/17/2021
1 in = 500 ft1 in = 0.09 mi¯SW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON STSW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
Page 20
C:\Users\Public\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User: hannahs
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Printing Date: 6/17/2021
1 in = 100 ft1 in = 0.02 mi¯SW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON STSW CORNER MARION RD/JACKSON ST
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, andthe City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using theinformation are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go towww.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclaimer
Page 21