HomeMy WebLinkAbout13. 20-462 NOVEMBER 24, 2020 20-462 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A MULTI-FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT AT THE 4200 BLOCK OF STATE HIGHWAY 91
INITIATED BY: S.C. SWIDERSKI, LLC.
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan for the proposed multi-family development at the 4200
Block of State Highway 91, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-387(6)
of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for a multi-
family development at the 4200 Block of State Highway 91, per the attached, is hereby
approved with the following conditions:
1. Base Standard Modification to allow a multi-family residential land use in the
Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU).
2. All signage shall be compliant with multi-family residential district signage
requirements.
3. Base Standard Modification to allow street-facing building ends (Huntington)
with 3% of the fagade devoted to door/window area, where code requires 20% of
street-facing facades to be devoted to door/window area.
4. Base Standard Modification to allow air conditioning units not flush-mounted to
the building.
5. Air conditioning units and wood porches/balconies on the structures' facades
shall be painted/stained or colored to match or compliment the building's
exterior fagade color.
6. Final landscaping and storm water management plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Community Development.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
DATE: November 19, 2020
RE: Approve General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for a
Multi -Family Development Located at the 4200 Block of State Highway 91 (Plan
Commission Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND
The subject area is zoned Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay
(SMU-PD) and consists of one double -fronted parcel encompassing approximately 15.84 acres,
with frontage along State Highway 91 and State Highway 44. The subject area contains a
vacant lot. The surrounding area consists predominantly of residential and vacant land uses
as well as industrial uses to the north. The 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends
mixed uses for the subject area.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific Implementation Plan
(SIP) approval for a new multi -family development on an existing vacant lot. The proposed
development will include 14 apartment buildings with a total of 172 units (60 one -bed, 72 two -
bed, 40 three -bed) averaging 1.88 bedrooms per unit. A property management office will also
be included on the site. The site will be accessed via a single entrance/exit from State Highway
91. The total impervious surface ratio for the site will be about 49%, which is well under the
maximum of 70%. Parking for the site will consist of 100 detached garage spaces, 72 attached
garage spaces and 277 surface spaces for a total of 449 parking spaces. The applicant has noted
that 23 bicycle parking spaces are being provided, which meets the minimum code requirement
of 20 bicycle spaces. The applicant has been in contact with the Department of Public Works
regarding storm water management for the area. The final storm water management plans will
be approved during the Site Plan Review process. The applicant meets and exceeds the
landscaping point requirements. A sign plan has been submitted which includes a 5' tall, 21 sq.
ft. monument sign along the STH 91 frontage. The sign meets code requirements for multi-
family residential monument signage. The applicant submitted a photometric plan that appears
to meet lighting standards. Final building elevations have been submitted for the project. The
applicant is requesting a Base Standard Modification (BSM) to the multi -family residential
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://w .ci.oshkosh.wi.us
design standards to allow for A/C units that are not flush -mounted to the building. The
applicant notes that the A/C units will have silver faces to blend into the grey siding. The
applicant is also requesting a BSM to allow reduced door/window area on the street -facing
building ends to 3% where code requires 20% of street -facing facades be devoted to
door/window area. The site plan includes a total of 5 dumpster enclosures that meet dumpster
enclosure requirements. The applicant is requesting BSMs related to the land use and building
design standards. To offset these BSMs, the applicant has significantly exceeded the overall
landscaping point requirement for the site and also provided fagade enhancements to improve
the appearance of the buildings. Staff is comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the
requested BSMs and the overall site is complimentary to the surrounding area.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this project should result in an increase in assessed property value for the site. The
owner is anticipating spending approximately $20.5 million on the improvements.
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan with findings and conditions at its November 17, 2020 meeting. Please see
the attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
Approved:
Mark A. Rohloff
City Manager
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://w .ci.oshkosh.wi.us
ITEM: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
APPROVAL FOR A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE
4200 BLOCK OF STATE HIGHWAY 91
Plan Commission meeting of November 17, 2020.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Property Owner/Applicant: S.C. Swiderski, LLC
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests approval for a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a multi -family development.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Type:
The subject area is zoned Suburban Mixed Use District with a Planned Development Overlay
(SMU-PD) and consists of one double -fronted parcel encompassing approximately 15.84 acres,
with frontage along State Highway 91 and State Highway 44. The subject area contains a vacant
lot. The surrounding area consists predominantly of residential and vacant land uses as well as
industrial uses to the north. The 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends mixed uses
for the subject area.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use
Zoning
Vacant land
SMU-PD
Adiacent Land Use and Zonin
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use
2040 Land Use Recommendation Mixed use
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific Implementation Plan
(SIP) approval for a new multi -family development on an existing vacant lot.
Use
The proposed development will include 14 apartment buildings with a total of 172 units (60
one -bed, 72 two -bed, 40 three -bed) averaging 1.88 bedrooms per unit. A property management
office will also be included on the site. The Suburban Mixed Use District (SMU) does not
permit residential uses (including apartments). Therefore, a Base Standard Modification (BSM)
is being requested to allow the proposed multi -family residential land use. Staff is supportive
of the proposed BSM as the multi -family residential use is consistent with the 2040
Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommendation of mixed use for the subject area.
Site Design/Access
The site will be accessed via a single entrance/exit from State Highway 91. The total impervious
surface ratio for the site will be about 49%, which is well under the maximum of 70% for the
SMU district. Parking for the site will consist of 100 detached garage spaces, 72 attached garage
spaces, and 277 surface spaces for a total of 449 parking spaces, exceeding the minimum of 2
spaces per dwelling unit containing 0-2 bedrooms, plus 0.5 space per additional bedroom over 2
bedrooms per unit and 1 guest parking space for every 3 dwelling units.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
Re wired
Provided
Parking Spaces
Minimum: 401
449
Impervious Surface
Maximum: 70% of lot
49% of lot
Minimum
Provided
Front Setback (STH 91)
25 ft.
32 ft.
Front Setback (STH 44)
25 ft.
66.13 ft.
Side Setback (east)
10 ft.
39.14 ft.
Side Setback (west)
10 ft.
26.99 ft.
An 8,300 sq. ft. recreation area is provided on the east side of the site, meeting the minimum
recreation area requirement of 200 sq. ft. plus 25 sq. ft. per bedroom. The code -required
pedestrian access is provided in the form of a pedestrian path that wraps around the site and
connects to the State Highway 91 right-of-way. The applicant has noted that 23 bicycle parking
spaces are being provided, which meets the minimum code requirement of 20 bicycle spaces.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
The applicant has been in contact with the Department of Public Works regarding storm water
management for the area. The final storm water management plans will be approved during
the Site Plan Review process. The Department of Public Works also noted that the sidewalk
needs to be installed through the driveway apron and grading needs to be coordinated for the
sidewalk along the State Highway 91 right-of-way.
Landscaping
PELECC�P
O `r —
psu.iw,..rF�
6ENOZ& NgrEs
• ��mwaanw Wwn wc�o-mu®s+w rawwwi u�m
��x..xs•rt•xa�.ewwr+we ��+�anwue
wrw�
�SG��� POINT Y�.4�1.E5
�.e
LAND APIN& PLAN
l�R WA' 4 RLR4gM LACRR LMY 6EfF ip R WrifRtlL
� !!D IHB 11FY�1 RE&R 51WrNA
[AYRfG
"•
PFC-ORAVNE PO RED
n� PROPERTY 6ON
� + GONGRETE LAWN EM
XV
�v.N.E. Mrs.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
Points Required
Points Provided
Huntington Building
Foundation (9 buildings)
162
177
Fulton Building
Foundation (5 buildings)
240
305
Building Foundation
(Office)
56
78
1240 (372 tall trees 496
2298
Paved Area
(1800 tall trees, 498
shrubs)
shrubs)
Street Frontage (STH 91)
663 (331.5 medium trees)
721 (345 medium trees)
Street Frontage (STH 44)
832.5
824 (412 medium trees)
(412.5 medium trees)
Yards
2,728
2,740.5
Bufferyard (east) with 6'
solidfencing
376.3
1540
Bufferyard (west) with 6'
solid fencing
318
1364
Total
8,863.3
12,692
Building Foundation
The building foundation landscaping point requirement of 40 landscaping points per 100 linear
feet of building foundation is being met for all buildings.
Paved Area
The paved area requirement of 40 landscaping points per 10 parking stalls or 10,000 sq. ft. of
paved area is being met. The code further specifies 30% of all points will be devoted to tall trees
and 40% will be devoted to shrubs. A tall deciduous/shade tree is required at the ends of all
parking rows. These requirements are also being met.
Street Frontage
Code requires 100 points per 100 feet of street frontage. The landscaping ordinance also
specifies that 50% of the required points must be devoted to medium trees. The landscape plan
shows medium trees along the frontages which meet the 50% point total requirement.
Yards
Code requires 20 landscaping points per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The provided yard
landscaping points exceeds this requirement.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 BIk STH 91
Bufferyards
A 0.4 opacity bufferyard is required along both the east and west property lines as the subject
site is bordering single family residentially zoned (Town of Nekimi) properties on both sides of
the property. A combination of 6' tall solid wood fencing and tall evergreen trees are shown on
the landscaping plan to meet bufferyard requirements along the east and west property lines.
The applicant is also meeting the landscape ordinance specification that 50% of the required
landscaping points must be located on the exterior side of the fencing.
Signage
A sign plan has been submitted which includes a 5' tall, 21 sq. ft. monument sign along the STH
91 frontage. The sign meets code requirements for multi -family residential monument signage.
Although the property has a base zoning of SW, staff is recommending a condition that all
signage be compliant with multi -family residential sign requirements.
Site Lighting
The applicant submitted a photometric plan that appears to meet lighting standards. The
proposed lighting meets the .4 foot-candle minimum requirement for parking areas and has no
more than .5 foot-candles of light trespass at the property line. The proposed 20 ft. height of the
light poles/fixtures complies with the 20 foot maximum height for the SW zoning district.
Building Facades
• �fn
Fulton front elevation
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
� L
ow ow W�mw ow ow mw
.... .... ° 11 II 1..-.:: -E-
1' M u.., III 11
QS
Huntington side and rear elevations
EXTERIDR FIN*NE$
Final building elevations have been submitted for the project. The applicant is requesting a
BSM to the multi -family residential design standards to allow for A/C units that are not flush -
mounted to the building. The applicant notes that the A/C units will have silver faces to blend
into the grey siding. Staff is supportive of this BSM as use of consistent colors of the units and
the siding will not detract from the overall appearance of the structures. Also, this will be
consistent with A/C units on previously approved multi -family developments within the City.
The applicant is also requesting a BSM to allow reduced door/window area on the street -facing
(Huntington) building ends to 3% where code requires 20% of street -facing facades be devoted
to door/window area. Staff is supportive of this reduction due to hardships related to the
building design that do not allow for additional door/window area. Staff also feels that the
applicant has sufficiently offset the BSM by enhancing these facades with projections and gables
and also including Class I materials (brick), multiple siding colors and white trim to improve
the appearance of the facade.
Refuse Enclosure
The site plan includes a total of 5 dumpster enclosures. The proposed enclosures meet
dumpster enclosure requirements as they are constructed of 6' tall solid wood fencing and
located no closer to the street than the principal structures.
Overall Site
The applicant is requesting BSMs related to the land use and building design standards. To
offset these BSMs, the applicant has significantly exceeded the overall landscaping point
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
requirement for the site and also provided facade enhancements to improve the appearance of
the buildings. Staff is comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the requested BSMs
and the overall site is complimentary to the surrounding area.
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Specific
Implementation Plan, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings
based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to
determine such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts
in the environs of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and
adequate buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptionsibase standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
Staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan
with the findings listed above and the proposed following conditions:
1. Base Standard Modification to allow a multi -family residential land use in the Suburban
Mixed Use District (SMU).
2. All signage shall be compliant with multi -family residential district signage
requirements.
3. Base Standard Modification to allow street -facing building ends (Huntington) with 3%
of the facade devoted to door/window area, where code requires 20% of street -facing
facades to be devoted to door/window area.
4. Base Standard Modification to allow air conditioning units not flush -mounted to the
building.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
5. Air conditioning units and wood porches/balconies on the structures' facades shall be
painted/stained or colored to match or compliment the building's exterior facade color.
6. Final landscaping and storm water management plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Department of Community Development.
The Plan Commission approved of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on
this item.
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Hinz reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The applicant requests approval for a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a multi -family development.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The proposed development will include 14
apartment buildings with a total of 172 units (60 one -bed, 72 two -bed, 40 three -bed). A property
management office will also be included on the site. The site will be accessed via a single
entrance/exit from State Highway 91. The total impervious surface ratio for the site will be
about 49%, which is well under the maximum of 70%. Parking for the site will consist of 100
detached garage spaces, 72 attached garage spaces and 277 surface spaces for a total of 449
parking spaces. The final storm water management plans will be approved during the Site Plan
Review process. Overall the landscaping plan meets or exceeds point requirements. A sign
plan has been submitted which includes a 5' tall, 21 sq. ft. monument sign along the STH 91
frontage. The photometric plan appears to meet lighting standards. Final building elevations
have been submitted for the project. The applicant is requesting a BSM to the multi -family
residential design standards to allow for A/C units that are not flush -mounted to the building.
The applicant is also requesting a BSM to allow reduced door/window area on the street -facing
(Huntington) building ends to 3% where code requires 20% of street -facing facades be devoted
to door/window area. The site plan includes a total of 5 dumpster enclosures that meet
dumpster enclosure requirements. Staff is comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset
the requested BSMs and the overall site is complimentary to the surrounding area. He said staff
recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan with
the findings and conditions listed in the staff report.
Ms. Propp opened technical questions to staff.
Mr. Hinz asked if staff talked with the applicant about more articulation on the north ends that
directly face the highway given they're allowed less window and door coverage, noting that the
ends looks really plain and he doesn't believe that's what the ordinance is trying to get at.
Mr. Lyons replied that it is 3% elevation. Staff did have some discussions with the applicant and
they were struggling with some design elements. They did encourage the applicant to look at
alternatives to bump the elevation up. Ultimately the applicant felt that with the layout of the
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91
site, they needed that specific number on that specific elevation. He said the applicant can
elaborate more on it, but staff did have discussions with the applicant about ways to enhance
the 3% elevation.
Mr. Mitchell asked if this was recently used as farm land and if so, if it is something that is
tracked.
Mr. Lyons replied that he does not know the last time it was farmed. He said the site was
brought into the city about a year and a half or two years ago.
Ms. Propp asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make
any statements.
Ms. Jackie Miller, on behalf of S.C. Swidesrski, stated that they have been working on this site
with staff over several months. They feel that they have laid out the building so that the most
attractive buildings are on the outside of the development. The buildings that provide lower
rent rates, which they really wanted to bring to the area, are on the interior of the site. On the
Huntington building, they enhanced with extra brick on the sides and they also tried to provide
some changes in the frontage so it's not a flat side. They are using a lot of landscaping on the
site, so she thinks overall with the design elements you're really looking to make sure the site is
attractive and by adding the extra landscaping, they are hoping it offsets the request to have the
modification approved on the one side of the building. The front and back of the building do
meet the requirements, so they are hoping it is considered and approved based on adding the
extra landscaping. You can see where the sides of the building are facing the highway there is
extensive landscaping along both sides so the side also will be buffered with a lot of trees so
you're going to see those as well.
Ms. Propp asked about circulation and the road system through the site, specifically if there was
more than one way to get in and out of the site.
Mr. Lyons replied affirmatively. He said one entrance is off of Highway 91, but then you can
circulate all the way within the site.
Mr. Mitchell asked if Ms. Miller could respond to some of the accessibility questions that she
received and if she could provide clarification about what services or support the City offered
specific to accessibility features at the property.
Ms. Miller replied that both Mr. Lyons and Mr. Slusarek discussed accessibility on the site with
them on several occasions, encouraging them to look at their current practices and add to their
current practices. At this site in particular, 50% of the units have low -threshold entries. In
addition to that, 29% of the units are one -level living and accessible with the bedroom and
bathroom on the main floor, so they feel that offers a lot of great options on the site. All of their
units have the 32 inch door width and they also use the 42 inch hallway throughout all of the
units. As far as the tubs and showers, they do have four units on the site that they call "Type A"
units that have all of the ADA requirements and some additional things to make sure they are
accessible. Those four units have doorbells and smoke alarms with the visual indicators. They
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91 10
have front loading washer and dryers, the kitchen ranges with front controls, and the clearance
for under the kitchen sink, so one can remove those cabinets and roll into that. They finish the
floor in those units under the cabinet space, so there is finished space if one were to remove the
cabinets. This is also done in the bathroom, which is not required. They use lever doors instead
of the turn handles on all of their units, which they found to be accessible for more people. All
of the units have elongated and raised toilets, which is also a feature people are looking for. All
of the lower level units have the backing so they can add the grab bars as needed by the tenants
and the grab bars are custom installed to their height requirements. They are managing the site
long term, so their maintenance staff installs the grab bars at the request of tenants. The backing
is in all of the main level units. All of the living areas are luxury vinyl plank, so they do not
have carpet in transition areas, which is easy for walking and wheel chairs. A lot of the
sidewalks have the wider width around the property management office which has the
mailboxes on the side of the building. They also work with tenants if they have extra requests,
so although the four units or 2% of the units have the "Type A" requirements met, they would
also install the doorbells and smoke detectors with visual indicators as needed by tenants. She
said that they really try to be friendly for accessibility issues and they enjoyed the conversations
with the staff related to accessibility because it helps them continue to improve.
Mr. Mitchell thanked Ms. Miller.
Mr. Ford stated that wanted to commend Ms. Miller and her company for answering these
questions. He said that he thinks it is a model for how every development should approach this
in the future.
Mr. Lyons stated that this developer has really been great to work with in terms of meeting
accessibility demands and incorporating accessibility features. He will look to this presentation
as the City works with developers in the future to demonstrate how staff and developers can
have a productive dialogue to ensure the commission has what they need. He thanked Ms.
Miller for doing a great job.
Ms. Miller thanked Mr. Ford and Mr. Lyons.
Mr. Mitchell asked if Ms. Miller could speak to the affordability levels for the units.
Ms. Miller replied that they are trying to provide several price points. The buildings that are in
the middle are one bedroom units and the units are on the end are three bedroom units. They
include heat, water, cable, and Wi-Fi in their rent rates, so the rates are all inclusive. The one
bedroom units are around $800, which is on the lower side. In the Huntington building, there
are four different floor plans including some smaller two bedroom units on the upper level that
are less expensive and then some townhome style units that are around $1,300. The range is
$800-$1,300, with most utilities included other than the electricity. She said their heat is
hydronic heating so that is part of the rent rate.
Mr. Mitchell thanked Ms. Miller.
There were no public comments on this item.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH 91 11
Ms. Propp closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
Ms. Miller stated that she appreciated staff working with them. It is a large project and they've
been working on it for a long time and staff has gone back and forth with them quite bit, so they
do appreciate their attention and support of the project.
Motion by Hinz to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Conditions:
1. Base Standard Modification to allow a multi family residential land use in the Suburban
Mixed Use District (SMU).
2. All signage shall be compliant with multi family residential district signage
requirements.
3. Base Standard Modification to allow street facing building ends (Huntington) with 3%
of the fagade devoted to doorlwindow area, where code requires 20% of street facing
facades to be devoted to doorlwindow area.
4. Base Standard Modification to allow air conditioning units not flush -mounted to the
building.
5. Air conditioning units and wood porcheslbalconies on the structures' facades shall be
paintedlstained or colored to match or compliment the building's exterior fagade color.
6. Final landscaping and storm water management plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Community Development.
Seconded by Mitchell.
Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Mr. Mitchell asked what considerations or provisions are in motion or will possibly be put in
place in conjunction with this development for either recreational activities around the area or
pedestrian traffic opportunities that allow for non -vehicular access to somewhere outside of the
site.
Mr. Lyons replied that recreational open space was provided in a couple spaces and they also
have a recreational path going through and around the site including going around the pond.
That is something that staff felt was important due to the remoteness of the site. He said staff
really wanted to make sure they built in some opportunities for recreation with the open spaces
and the walking path.
Mr. Mitchell asked if there was consideration for connecting to city sidewalks in the future.
Mr. Lyons replied affirmatively. They have had discussions about how to connect this area to
the greater City sidewalk system. There is bit of a gap between this area and where sidewalks
reside within the city. One thing they are dealing with presently with Ms. Naudziunas, who is
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 Blk STH91 12
our Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner, Council, and Engineering staff is to begin long range
planning connections for sidewalks of this nature. He said they know the City dollars only go so
far and only so much sidewalk can be installed annually, so instead of taking a single step
request each year, they are looking at the City in its entirety and putting forth a five or seven
year plan for connecting the sidewalks.
Mr. Mitchell asked if there was any discussion with city transit for potentially serving this area
which may have several hundred residents and some lower income families.
Mr. Lyons replied that there have been very preliminary discussion at this point, but more
discussion are needed to incorporate this into their current route planning.
Mr. Gierach stated that there are currently bus stops along the corridor, although not directly
adjacent to this site. There are stops along W. Waukau crossing Highway 41 onto Highway 91
as well as S. Oakwood, which is around one thousand feet or so away from the site. He said
there are bus stops in the vicinity of the area.
Mr. Hinz stated that he wanted to commend staff and the petitioner on this because it has been
in the works for a really long time. The commission has had a significant turn over and aka city
staff including the Planning Services Manager since this started. There was a somewhat
lukewarm response when the applicant first came through with this, but they continued to
work with staff and did everything that the commission would hope for. He said he wants to
make sure that everyone gets their recognition for this because it was a long time coming and
the thinks it will be very good for the City.
Ms. Propp stated that she has a mild concern about the exterior, but it is not a serious problem
that she has. She said she appreciates all the accommodations they have for accessibility.
Motion carried 9-0.
ITEM. GDP SIP 4200 BIk STH91 13
SUBMIT
Dept.
City of Oshkosh Dept. off Community Development
Cityot 215 Church Ave., P.O. Box 1 130
Oshkosh Planned Development Application Oshkosh,wl 54901
PHONE: (920) 236-5059
For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan
**PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK**
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: S.C. Swiderski, LLC Date: 10/15/2020
Petitioner's Address: 401 Ranger Street City: Mosinee State: W1 Zip: 54455
Telephone #: (715 ) 693-9522
Email: jmiller(a--)scswiderski.com Contact preference: ❑ Phone 4Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): ' , wner/1_1 Representative I_i Tenant I l Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature(required): `�" Date: %u 1(v12-
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): S.C. Swiderski, LLC Date: 10/15/2020
Owner(s) Address: 401 Ranger Street City: Mosinee State: WI Zip: 54455
Telephone #: (715) 693-9522 Email: 'miller scswiderski.com Contact preference: ❑ Phone ,Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): r1 Individual r1 Trust l_1 Partnership /Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter
upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all
meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other
administrative reasons. n
Property Owner's Signature:
TYPE OF REQUEST: /
-0 General Development Plan (GDP)
❑ Specific Implementation Plan (SIP)
SITE INFORMATION
Date: lD Ao1Zz)
❑ General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment
❑ Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment
Address/Location of Proposed Project: No site address assigned, part of the NE 1/4 of Sec 5 T17N R16E
Proposed Project Type: Suburban Mixed Use - Planned Development
Current Use of Property: Undeveloped Zoning: SMU-PD
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: Commercial
South: Agricultural
East: Rural Residential
West: _Agricultural, Rural Residential
It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal.
Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
Y Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm
Sign Staff Date Rec'd
❑ Proposed grading plan.
❑ Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location, species, and installation size of
plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species.
❑ Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi -family structures, or building clusters, other than
conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor
area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings.
❑ Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems, stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and
walkways.
❑ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs,
and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common
practices.
❑ Specific written description of the proposed SIP including:
• Specific project themes and images.
• Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses.
• Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre,
and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity.
• Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland.
• Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
• Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots
and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and
landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by
Plan Commission.
• A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shall list the standard
zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion, would inhibit the development project and the
opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project.
• A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s)
in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur.
Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended.
❑ Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the
development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common
open areas and amenities.
❑ A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all
differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP.
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are included with this
application. I am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result in denial or
delay of the application request.
Applicant's Signature (required): Date: 1D11cn12-0
v
r�
QL
E
+'
E
E
O
E
a� a�
v
E
O
O
O
i
L1A
~�j
O
i
Q
�
(/)
N
I�
m
CO
N
lB
m
c-I N
J U
O
O
O
w
~ 'c
O
N
O
N
>
p c
LL
o
U =
Q
N
U
Z
A
a
ICI
Ai
M
W
O
4
E
4-10
N
O
LL
LNL
O
O
,n
O
}
Lj-
a_
oN
ro
a)
LNL
M
c-I
Ol
m
-0
N
s
U
*'
Ln
L L
O
Ln
�
-0
N
L
v
*'
LNL
N
I=
c-I
r-i
rn
O
4
�
+
p
a)
LN
L
lD
M
N
N
`�
Ln
O
c
W
vOi
m
p
p
00
a:
�./
LO
N
"
s
p
a
?
Q
�
�
o2S
�1
N
iJ
ul
�4
a
N
i
Ul
O
Q
Q
O
h�0
oM
LU
�A
cn
Q
N
bA
�
�F1
O
i
5�
N
Ln
LL
�4
c
Y
N
Q
`—
(n
LL
C
LL
Li-
Ln
Li-
Ln
Ln
0
Y
U
A
Q
t
y'
ra
i
cB
c
Q
Ln
M
Q'
c
Ln
d
O
me
r-
lD
Izi:
0)
a
o
'E
LLJ
O
I,
00
E
N
O
Ln
r-i
Q0
m
O
H
m
Lr
N
Ln
--�5
a
a
ri
ri
N
t
N
vi
00
i
N
ci
Co
M
7
L
n °
O
Q
L
O
> 70
cII N
Q
>1
cQ
= (f)
to
L
-0
70
I
+�
O
p
Q
U
E
Q
a
w
L
U_
CD
N
O
E
coCU
CD cB
Q.
CD
Z3
0
N
_0
N
cu
�_
O
p
°
�
O
co
N
N
(C�aJ1
p
U-
O
cB
a
Q
o
�),�
�U �
a�
�a)Q
o
�
YN
w
O
W
U
+
Q
N
N
N
to
cu
O
0
U
cQ
>
V
N
>
_0
N
`�
+�
Ca �
L
co
�
u
L
^L,
rT1
0
�
(Q
a) a)+
� 0
0
W
—
a)`
_0
= L
U
a
W
V
O
cQ
(n
}
(U-0
co
3 E
00
— U
O
L
O
L
O
N
•�
��
N
O
Cocu
N �'
L
> CU
0
CD
W
co
a
i
U0 Z5
L
O
�IW,
W
—
L
N
L
�
�
� a
o
a
Y
+�
U
N
_
� a_
L O
U
O
°
a
0
0
a
U
Co
L
°
CU Co
T
O
E
,)
o
0)
�+(N_Bcn
��
a'�
(B (B
�
�0�
I
tf
=
_LcI
(n
_cu
Q-�
CU
Q
O
�'
O
O L-�
�
+�+
az
�0
�
mop
zo
cu
O
7
O>
O
O
O
ca
U
O N
Q(
L
U
Q
cu
cB
U
N
O
.aO
Q
Q
U
N
°
O
V)
Q
CU
J
C/5
E
,
U
�
L
O 0-
0
U
4—
;
U
N
>
c7
� (n
to
(Q
SCS Oshkosh
City of Oshkosh, Winnebago County, WI
For: S.C. Swiderski, LLC
20
aiNngP
w / I
Elt
PandS
LEGEND t e
Zonaeltra-mo d re ® ter nholee- eo ,dePa mem
� a�a�asnowso�ga naa
LOCATION MAP
P iett
PROJECT INFO—TION
IT-bn No D,teAdd,easAgned
S 0000 se PannedDePeOpment are
oeapanryelas,deg0n Offte DreupD
unn'9mn-GmupR-pgs-2
"Ito, reuphS
C—t—mn Type Off,be-Type ve-sp--d-NFPwi aR
uno,)gnn- Type va- spdnaered- N FPwi aR
n- Type VB-spdnaered-NFPwi aR
caages- Type VB - Norvsp--d
umt De,, ty o uma �1 ummAcre
ro)—we e aei impervs
ManDqd ,Ne19 Pat
Th" Step g sF(15A5 Al—)
-poled Diw,oed Area 310 000
zsF
2 s stalls pe, umt=m7 eq,,ed
"9 pb-g spbte, pmpo,ed
r" mtsmping shau oea^ p=ed
.
ught poiesm oe resnovedrremcted perme ugrrtv)q plan (qt omens).
No pad d— oemanuracbe t and onsre
way co —I, Dry onote
sn Sspelifcatones ad require a cry D9rrtrn
Olhklld Rt"dht an ewm cPelm� of Osmmsn Murdsipai ade chapter ia, a
inspetmn wmh me Dep—ent H Pubs woda is regwred m be Ina, wings war an awuut certmaaon oya
purred anerdiginseerofine smrmwatermanagemeb pats are
req"e a
F. A g p e:w oenor on the ouum,)gs.
401
Mosne9a 54455
V
)
SHEET INDEX
Paqe
ainageand Dtamr)q Plan Morm)
rainageand v7tamr)q Pianl PI utn)
E— Pia ,men onon an14
Ut
P an&Pare cemer a0ao 0,001, 0.5206 03
SITE PLAN
DAVEL ENGINEERING &
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
CiNI Engineers and Land Surveyors
1p�(a20, es, iefse Fa(e2o) mi-0e 2 1— oaemoa
Project Nvumber: 6129
October 15, 2020 Pe1.1
4
GDP/SIP 41MPRINT INC JOSEPH A/DONNA AVERKAMP
4200 BLK STATE HWY 91 PO BOX 320 4102 STATE ROAD 91
PC:11-17-20 OSHKOSH W154903 OSHKOSH W154904
JOSEPH A/DONNA AVERKAMP AKINS-PARSONS-WELCH PREY, DALE R
2875 PRAIRIE WOOD DR 2220 KEOTA LN 4094 STATE RD 44
OSHKOSH W154904 SUPERIOR CO 80027 OSHKOSH W154904
TAFFEL, NATHAN COOK, MARK D NOZAR JR LIV TST, JAMES F
210 E CHOWNING CROSS ST 4159 STATE RD 91 4097 STATE RD 91
THIENSVILLE W153092 OSHKOSH W154904 OSHKOSH W154904
TOWN OF NEKIMI S C SWIDERSKI LLC
3790 PICKETT RD 401 RANGER ST
OSHKOSH W154904 MOSINEE WI 54455
�Y � 0 0 D! rs -,I) - r� rI ���l �r 9,
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer
N
1 in=0.05mi
1 in=250ft
Printing Date: 10/28/2020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh
J � j J r� rI YJ It t N 1 in = 0.11 mi
1 in = 600 ft
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to
www.cl.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer
Printing Date: 10/28/2020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh
- f.0 0 ED K "' r� rJ'�'l �r -1
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer
t
N
1 in=0.06mi
1 in=300ft
Printing Date: 10/28/2020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh